Slashdot Mirror


Conficker Downloads Payload

nk497 writes "Conficker seems to finally be doing something, a week after hype around the worm peaked on April Fool's Day. It has now downloaded components from the Waledac botnet, which could contain rootkit capabilities. Trend Micro security expert Rik Ferguson said: 'These components have so far been missing, but could this finally be the "other boot dropping" that we have all been been waiting for?' Ferguson also suggested that people behind Conficker could be the very same who are running Waledac and created the Storm botnet. 'It tallies with some of the assumptions people have made about Conficker — that the first variant was actively trying to avoid the Ukraine because Waledac was Eastern European,' Ferguson added."

273 comments

  1. Finally? by KGIII · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's about damned time. Can we stop reading about this daily now?

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    1. Re:Finally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. It is the only news.

    2. Re:Finally? by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Warning: The comments are disappointing. 49% are bickering over the date format used in the summary, 49% about the Irish Potato Famine, and the remaining Conflicker-related comments are predictable.

    3. Re:Finally? by shokk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm researching the Irish Potato Famine at the moment. Thanks for the tip!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  2. At least by cha0zmag3 · · Score: 0

    all the doom and gloom prophets can say they were right, and then tell us to believe that the earth still revolves around the sun.

  3. april fools by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Downloading its payload and going live a week after April 1? Now that's the way to do an April Fools joke.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:april fools by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the Conficker was going for the clichéd horror film approach. Granted, it should have really done it on April 2nd but doing it this way has probably blind sided more people.

    2. Re:april fools by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      That honestly would have rocked...

      April 1 - 2009 Conflicker downloads and activates it evil payload. Computer screens all over the world go black with large red numbers counting down to....... something......

      Do it like the many really bad computer hacker movies. That would simply be funny as hell. The raging panic from the easily panicked sheep, Fox news will report that Conflicker turns your computer into a bomb, etc....

      THAT would be the coolest April fools joke ever.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:april fools by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      Downloading payload a day after the news that computers controlling the grid have been infected by spyware. "oh crap they're on to us. Better attack now before they run spybot on everthing."

    4. Re:april fools by sskagent · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your computer would have to beep. All movie computers make excessive, unneeded noise.

    5. Re:april fools by eieken · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's easy, conficker would just have to install this: http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nbeep/

      --
      Meet new people, and kill them.
    6. Re:april fools by argiedot · · Score: 1

      Does anyone here remember Eon 8? It was this website which displayed nothing but a map and blinking red dots on some cities and a countdown timer, if I remember correctly.

    7. Re:april fools by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      We should start a project on Source Forge for next April. A world wide down counting program that when it reaches zero beep loudly, would be cool. Imagine a world wide beep, hundreds of millions of Windows PCs crying out in agony at the same time.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    8. Re:april fools by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      But with the rise of nice and silent SSDs, don't computers with moving hard disks already make excessive, unneeded noise anyway?

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    9. Re:april fools by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      *beep* *beep* *beep* Just *beep* let *beep* me *beep* check *beep* my *beep* Tricorder. *beep* *beep*

    10. Re:april fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg I installed that and it really is _awesome_...

    11. Re:april fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be even better if they add a talking avatar for the virus, a la "DaVinci" virus!

      ZOMG! It's singing row row row your boat now! Somebody do something!

    12. Re:april fools by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Does Spybot even detect conficker? I haven't found any data in this.

    13. Re:april fools by trick-knee · · Score: 1

      there's already a firefox plugin for that.

  4. Holidy Weekend. by GreggBz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bots and spammers typically wait for the holiday weekends; like playing your starters against their backups.

    1. Re:Holidy Weekend. by mrops · · Score: 1

      Bots, spammers and organizations doing layoff.

      There, now its corrected.

    2. Re:Holidy Weekend. by skeeto · · Score: 3, Funny

      like playing your starters against their backups.

      Could you change that into a car analogy? Thanks!

    3. Re:Holidy Weekend. by thedonger · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like showing up to a street race in a rickety-looking Ford Escort which secretly houses a small block V8 with nitrous.

      It's like a porn star showing up to a naked pool party for men with erectile dysfunction.

      It's like bringing a gun to a knife fight.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

      like playing your starters against their backups.

      Could you change that into a car analogy? Thanks!

      It's like playing your things that you turn the key in that makes your engine go vroom!vroom! against their things that go Beeeeep Beeeeeep Beeeeep.

    5. Re:Holidy Weekend. by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 1

      Like bringing a motorbike to a bicycle race?

    6. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Oxygen99 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's like rai--ai--ain, on your wedding day...

      --
      I had a dream, bright and carefree, but now there's doubt and gravity
    7. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have never understood that stupid song. Everything she lists is unfortunate, or inconvenient, but not a single one is actually ironic. Maybe that's the irony. Or maybe that word doesn't mean what Alanis thinks it means.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    8. Re:Holidy Weekend. by stillnotelf · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's like bringing 10,000 spoons to a knife fight?

    9. Re:Holidy Weekend. by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      like playing your starters against their backups.

      Could you change that into a car analogy? Thanks!

      Like car-theives waiting until you've filled your gas tank to steal your car

    10. Re:Holidy Weekend. by TheDreadSlashdotterD · · Score: 1

      Tonight, we dine, on pudding!

      --
      I have nothing to say.
    11. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't laugh, I've had that happen :( $100 tank of gas....

    12. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's meta-irony.

    13. Re:Holidy Weekend. by syrinx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The irony is that a song called "Ironic" is not ironic.

      But wait, that would mean the song is ironic after all. Which of course means that it isn't.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    14. Re:Holidy Weekend. by NinjaPablo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pudding can't fill the emptiness inside my heart. But it'll help.

      --
      SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    15. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      It's a mystery, wrapped in an enigma, rolled up in a spinach tortilla. Ow, my brain hurts from thinking about the implications...


      Why couldn't she just called it "Moronic" and be done with all this?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    16. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because, it'll hurt more?

    17. Re:Holidy Weekend. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      +1 LOL. Comments like this are the reason I keep coming back to this place. Luckily I was not holding my coffee at the time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Holidy Weekend. by AK+Marc · · Score: 0

      not a single one is actually ironic

      The guy afraid of flying that dies on his first flight is ironic. A free ride when you've already paid could also count.

    19. Re:Holidy Weekend. by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      At my old apartment we had someone stealing gas on the peak of the market.
      Since my truck is crap it was an easy target. They stole almost an entire 30 gallon tank full.

      I found out who it was by disconnecting my fill spout from the tank (and piping a new fill spout from the tool box in the bed), and putting in a mini tank on the OEM filler. Filled it with about 3 gallons of nitromethane and 2 gallons of diesel. All of a sudden one day this (asshat) ricer had his engine almost explode. It was quite funny.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    20. Re:Holidy Weekend. by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A friend of mine did similar. His vehicle has two 25 gallon gas tanks. So, he routed one so it filled up from a non-obvious location and the second tank he filled up with water and used a non locking gas cap. It was not uncommon to see more than the usual amount of dead cars in parking lots, especially during last year when the price of gas spiked.

    21. Re:Holidy Weekend. by dfn_deux · · Score: 1

      This is actually the explanation which I've read/heard is the one that Alanis Morisette herself offers with regards to the apparent incongruity between the lyrics and the title. As to whether or not she developed that response before or after writing the song is anyone's guess.

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    22. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Or like a balloon blowing up ... and something bad happens.

    23. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that word means exactly what she thinks it means and the irony is that she purposefully wrote a song that sold millions of copies titled "Ironic" but whose lyrics deceptively aren't.

    24. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A song titled "Ironic" that lists a whole lot of things that fail to be ironic. That, my friends, is the very definition of irony.

      Brilliant!

    25. Re:Holidy Weekend. by benedictaddis · · Score: 1

      Ed Byrne: "The only ironic thing about that song is that it's called 'Ironic' and it's written by a woman who doesn't know what irony is." www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT1TVSTkAXg

    26. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See also: making the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    27. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, a human heart could hold about 4-5 ounces of pudding if stuffed to capacity. But I wouldn't recommend it.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    28. Re:Holidy Weekend. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      We had not only rain, but hail on our wedding day. It was marvelous! We still remember it and talk about it occasionally nearly 2 decades later.

      We had our wedding at a carousel, which we rented. There's nothing like riding a carousel watching the rain and hail sitting next to your bride and watching the rain and hail. Then we dashed across to the building were the wedding was performed. (Never mind what I can remember about the rest of the day.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    29. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      See, the problem is, there's this word called ironic that means something, but it's something that most people just don't really get, can't explain very well, and never properly recognize in real life.

      Then there's this other thing, which is seen regularly in real life and everybody understands, but doesn't have a particularly good word for it (the thing that makes you go "yeah, it figures") which is apparently not irony, but it's close enough that people apply the term because they don't know what else to call it.

      Honestly, I'm all for accepting the practical fact that the thing everybody thinks is irony might as well just be accepted as being irony, and the thing that is presently called irony, which nobody can really explain or understand, ought to just stop being called anything.

    30. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in one of the Star Wars books they explained how this measurement "works". If I remember correctly, the path from Kessel required smugglers to go around some black holes. The faster the ship, the closer you could get to the black holes without being sucked in, and the shorter the distance you had to travel.

      --
      Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
    31. Re:Holidy Weekend. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I know how it was explained. I was referring to the pretty hokey explanation given post-event trying to pass it off like they planned it that way all along. They didn't. Somebody screwed up and instead of admitting it, they made up a complex explanation.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    32. Re:Holidy Weekend. by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      For extra points, tell him to put some sugar in the water.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    33. Re:Holidy Weekend. by deets101 · · Score: 1

      Dipped in secret sauce?

      --

      --
      My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
    34. Re:Holidy Weekend. by deets101 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes irony can be pretty ironic.

      --

      --
      My parents went to Slashdot and all I got was this lousy sig.
    35. Re:Holidy Weekend. by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think of it differently. Han is an experienced criminal in Star Wars. Luke is still quite naive.

      Han says that the MF made the Kessel run in less than twelve parsecs, obviously not a measure of time. Luke asks if that is fast. Han then knows that Luke is an interstellar NOOB. While not nice, this type of behavior was something that made Han Solo interesting in the first films. He went from a selfish smuggler that would have ejected his passengers in space to a selfless leader.

      But like the another change made to the story, where Greedo fires first to make Han not the aggressor, the back-story was created to make Han nicer. I guess we just can't have mean, selfish, egotistical smugglers nowadays.

      --
      "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
    36. Re:Holidy Weekend. by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Fuck sugar, throw in some nitromethane!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. april fools? by pickle_in_being · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it would have been more logical for conficker to download it's payload on the 1st of April itself, so that people would take the threat less serious.

    1. Re:april fools? by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone was expecting that and was prepared for it. A week later, everyone's forgotten about it. Also with this timing if something starts going wrong now it will be difficult to get anyone to fix it until Tuesday.

    2. Re:april fools? by MeisterVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this case everyone was growing to expect just that, and would therefore be taking it seriously. Or at least people that could do something about it would. Now, since nothing much has happened people are lulled into a false sense of security and become lax or start considering the threat that something big was happening on 4/1 the real joke.

      Now that the hype has supsided, what better time to strike? I think that dovetails nicely with GreggBZ's earlier post about the holiday weekend (for some of us).

      --
      Government - If you think the problems we create are bad, you should see our solutions!
    3. Re:april fools? by Richard.g.k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would think that the security companies would at some level keep things running 24/7, since the internet never sleeps

      And if not, thats very surprising to me

    4. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...start considering the threat that something big was happening on 4/1 the real joke.

      Something big was was happening on the fourth of January?

      Oh, never mind - you're an American. Of course. You write the date the wrong way around.

      (I wish you people would think, occasionally, and realise that websites are international - there are intertubes running to other countries too - I believe even Canada has the internet these days.)

    5. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Go cry.

    6. Re:april fools? by barncha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not something, someone. It is America.

    7. Re:april fools? by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      Half the world writes it 4/1 the other half 1/4, the one you use doesn't make it any better then the one they use.
      It's a big world, you have to expect people to do things differently then you do...but then that would be thinking people are individuals and it's ok to be different

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    8. Re:april fools? by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Overworked Atheist Security Experts to the rescue?

      The lack of religious holidays would likely foil most attempts to catch them with their pants down...

      --
      America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
    9. Re:april fools? by mowall · · Score: 1

      Half the world writes it 4/1 the other half 1/4

      Not true - the majority write the day first. See the map here. It seems the Chinese are the only ones who get it "right"!

    10. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Closer inspection of the map you identify shows several more nations also use the yyyy/mm/dd convention, but since they are in Eastern Europe and I am American, I have no idea what they are.

    11. Re:april fools? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Half the world writes it 4/1 the other half 1/4

      Half? About one twentieth of the world (by population) writes it month/day or month/day/year, in the so-called "middle-endian" form. The other nineteen twentieths mostly write it day/month or day/month/year, in the so-called "little-endian" form. The ISO 8601 standard is the "big-endian form" year-month-day which is used in a few countries.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format#Date_format

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    12. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American website, American-style dates.
      Would you eurotrash please stop being offended over every single thing we do that just happens to be different from you? Otherwise we can come and take our Marshall Plan dollars back, and you can try to be independent for once in your countries' existence.

    13. Re:april fools? by Niris · · Score: 1

      Bawww, someone who doesn't fit my idea of conformity! Maybe we should put everyone who writes the month first in a camp. That sounds like a great idea! Oh wait...

    14. Re:april fools? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Half the world? Wow, that's what we're calling the US, Canada, Belize, Micronesia, Kenya, Palau, the Philippines, and Puerto Rico?

      Then again, I remember the Coalition Of The Willing well, how Micronesia, Belize and Palau had sent half their military to Iraq (I think it was what, 7 soldiers between them?), so "people were for us". (One wonders if they would have if the US hadn't threatened to withhold aid, but that's getting even more off-topic...)

    15. Re:april fools? by mowall · · Score: 1

      You're right, didn't notice that. Also Iran uses yyyy/mm/dd, I'm pretty sure that as an American you know who those guys are!

    16. Re:april fools? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      You had me at US...

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    17. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm was used more often. Sure makes it easy to find specific documents if you end your file names that way.

    18. Re:april fools? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      it also conclusively shows that the Kenyians and Canadians are thoroughly confused people, particularly when discussing dates between the first and twelfth of the month.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    19. Re:april fools? by teknognome · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, China uses year-month-day, which means they'd write it 4/1. So atleast one fifth of the world's population would write 4/1.

    20. Re:april fools? by Espinas217 · · Score: 1

      Half the world writes it 4/1 the other half 1/4, the one you use doesn't make it any better then the one they use.

      Where I come from we write it dd/mm but after some thinking about it I realized that mm/dd is just easier to sort and compare.

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
    21. Re:april fools? by Narnie · · Score: 1

      Don't I feel backwards for writing it year/month/day---but it makes sorting backups and such so much easier.

      --
      greed@All_Evils:~#
    22. Re:april fools? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I usually write dates like this: yyyymmdd so April 1st 2009 would have been 20090401. Plus you can store the dates as an int, and the Boolean functions (>,,etc.) work. Yes we will have a year 214,748 bug. But if any of my code is still in use 200,000 years from now I would be surprised. Hell if any of my code from 15 years ago is still being used I'd be surprised.

    23. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't I feel backwards for writing it year/month/day---but it makes sorting backups and such so much easier.

      That's what kills me about this.

      I live in the USA, where the government recommends yyyy-mm-dd but everyone actually uses mm/dd/yy.

      Every year I have to tell my kids' teachers "my kids are going to date their papers using the internationally standardized date notation, and you are going to accept it. Here's a handout with many reasons why, that also includes recommendations from NIST and other prestigious US scientific organisations. I will be checking their homework for proper date format, you don't have to do anything except allow them to do it right". In every single case the teachers read what I've provided, agree that I am being reasonable, and then take exactly zero steps to educate any child other than my own in proper date notation.

      Every job I've ever worked, I've had a similar experience: I explain why we're all going to use ISO dates, and show how computer programs get more efficient, misunderstandings are prevented, etc. etc. etc. and everyone agrees but then keeps on using the retarded US format. They are all totally conditioned from school.

      So, now that I have wealth and power, I simply fire everyone I catch using the stupid format. My employees tell each other, "He's reasonable about everything else, but he has a bug up his ass about date formats". This strategy is working incredibly well for me, because I now have zero employees who are unable to overcome mental conditioning. And someday my kids will rule this nation, because they are being raised smarter than their peers (most of whom are examples of devolution in action - can't ride, shoot, spell, or converse intelligently).

    24. Re:april fools? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, China uses year-month-day, which means they'd write it 4/1. So at least one fifth of the world's population would write 4/1.

      No, they don't. They usually specify which number is month and which is day, whether the year is given or not. In some cases which include the year, they use dashes as separators (never slashes), so it would be 2000-4-1 (NOT 2000/4/1). More typically, the characters for year, month, day are inserted after the corresponding number, giving something like 2000year4month1day or 4month1day. Here's the authority cited by Wikipedia:
      ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/globalization/locales/China-SimplifiedChinese_Date.pdf
      The only people who would write the first day of April as 4/1 are those listed as using the "middle-endian" date format in the Wikipedia article. And some of those use "little-endian" and "big-endian" forms as well (e.g. Canada).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    25. Re:april fools? by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Oh, never mind - you're an American. Of course. You write the date the wrong way around.

      Why do you say we write the date incorrectly? You know that time is written hour:minute:seconds, right? Expand that.
      Year:Month:Day:Hour:Minute:Second

      4/1 is clearly correct. The time as I post this in Eastern Daylight Time is about 2008:4:9:15:14:23 or so.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    26. Re:april fools? by dotgain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would think that the security companies would at some level keep things running 24/7,

      And how do you propose they might do that? Reroute power through the main deflector dish?

    27. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which is stupid anyway. Every programmer knows: year/month/day is the only way to play.

    28. Re:april fools? by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

      year-mm-dd is by far the most usefull to me -- that way when you sort by the date in character format and numerical format they both end up in the right order.

      try naming files backup 12-04-2009, backup 17-11-2008 in windows, then find the latest backup in amongst a group of 50 similar folders.
      ( yes you can sort by date created/modified, but sometimes that isn't accurate if the backups have been copied/moved. yes, i know some type of content management system would be better for this ... )

    29. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like it's SHOWTIME!

    30. Re:april fools? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      And Japan, Mongolia, Taiwan, both Koreas, and the previously mentioned European countries.

    31. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ISO 8601 standard is the "big-endian form" year-month-day which is used in a few countries.

      Like China. So your fractions are off.

    32. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a big world, you have to expect people to do things differently then you do

      moreso if you're an american. you guys seem to seek out a different and incompatible way to do everything, rather than going with the world accepted standards. you're like the microsoft of countries

    33. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      examples include:
      • retarded date format
      • retarded imperial system
      • retarded fahrenheit for measuring temperature
      • umpteen different incompatible cell phone standards WITHIN THE SAME COUNTRY

      you guys seem to be blind to just how stupid you appear to the rest of the world

    34. Re:april fools? by DTemp · · Score: 1

      You must be fun at parties.

    35. Re:april fools? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm was used more often. Sure makes it easy to find specific documents if you end your file names that way.

      If only the filesystem had some sort of date/time stamping facility...

  6. Potato Blight for computers by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the major causes of the Potato famine in Ireland was the reliance on a single product (the potato) and an inability to shift to a more varied diet. Things like ILoveYou and Conflicker are preying on exactly the same homogeneous environment as they know that hitting one element yields massive results.

    Now given that this homogeneity has been driven in part via a convicted monopolist then it really is interesting how little political attention this gets. Arguably these sorts of attacks are more of a modern challenge than "traditional" terrorism and against a background of economic woe we can all do without a bunch of companies getting taken offline for a few days or suffering from industrial espionage.

    We don't learn from history, we don't apply history to new cases we just stand back in amazement after letting homogeneity develop at the impact that a relatively simple flaw can have across a large group of people.
     

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, because obviously the answer is to have a hundred different systems with a hundred different sets of vulnerabilities. That will be much easier to keep patched.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:Potato Blight for computers by entirely_fluffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Yeah, because obviously the answer is to have a hundred different systems >with a hundred different sets of vulnerabilities. That will be much easier >to keep patched. well, actually, this really is the answer - you never get rid of vulnerabilities but you can put enough variation in them that specialised viruses become less effective.

    3. Re:Potato Blight for computers by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 0

      No but it would be a lot harder to exploit and that is GP point. Additionally in a heterogeneous system all the computers have to stick very strictly to well defined protocols (to avoid incompatibility) which makes it easier for firewalls to block any strange behavior.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    4. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, since the barrier to entry is so low as far as blackhats are concerned, ALL systems end up being more insecure and virus-ridden and no one benefits.

      Or virus-writers will pick, instead of the top 1, the top 5, or the top 50% of systems, and target those. Unless it were a truly heterogeneous network, with every single person having their own hand-crafted OS and application set, there will be viruses because people, dammit, want to see the dancing bunnies.

      Reference: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000347.html

    5. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote for a Microsoft run torrent tracker. It's really fucking stupid that after all these years our OS programmers haven't adapted to their operating environments.

      The way I see this, we wouldn't need Windows Defender, Microsoft Malicious Software Removal Tool, or any of that other bloat. MS should, as part of the cd-key activation, provide its customers with an account on it's Windows Torrent Tracker. Each and every file the OS is comprised of would be authenticated, hashed, and served by the actual vendor, MS. The functional part of this idea would be an encrypted and obfuscated hash checking service. Scans could be run in real time or on a schedule. With the abundance of network bandwidth and CPU cores we will have over the coming years, the processing power a system like this would consume will be negligible.

      Now, feel free to shred this idea to ribbons. Or better yet, feel free to help make this a better idea.

    6. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Larry+Clotter · · Score: 1

      well, actually, this really is the answer - you never get rid of vulnerabilities but you can put enough variation in them that specialised viruses become less effective.

      So the answer is to have a solution that is a nightmare for anyone who has to maintain it? Yeah, that sounds brilliant.

    7. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Cornwallis · · Score: 2, Funny

      So I understand you to mean I should stop using my potatoe to surf the web?

    8. Re:Potato Blight for computers by cyn1c77 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because obviously the answer is to have a hundred different systems with a hundred different sets of vulnerabilities. That will be much easier to keep patched.

      His point was that you don't need to keep things patched as regularly if you have a wider variety of OSes because there will be less people finding vulnerabilities, less incentive to exploit them,and less hackers writing worms for a given OS.

    9. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a moron. The reason there was a famine is because England was stealing all the food with guns! I could use many a analogy about linux or learning media but want people to realise that there was no famine only a theft!

    10. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No but it would be a lot harder to exploit and that is GP point.

      Why? It is often only necessary to attack the weakest link in the chain. To get inside a company network and copy documents available to employees, for example, only one employee workstation needs to be subverted. That is easier if there are several different systems running - just pick the crappest one and exploit that.

      Of course, it's arguable that the one system which is widely deployed in a monoculture today is in fact that one crappest and least secure of all the choices available. In which case adding a bit more variety would not hurt things, but it wouldn't improve them either, unless almost all the Windows systems were removed.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    11. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His point was that you don't need to keep things patched as regularly if you have a wider variety of OSes because there will be less people finding vulnerabilities, less incentive to exploit them,and less hackers writing worms for a given OS.

      That is the definition of 'security through obscurity'. I would not want to run an insecure system and hope to be safe because nobody else had heard about it. True security means using well-known and peer-reviewed code (but not 'well known to be crap').

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    12. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Larry+Clotter · · Score: 1

      Except in such a case you just have to exploit one box and you get access to the rest. There went all your brilliant planning and schemes.

    13. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 brutal truth.

    14. Re:Potato Blight for computers by bazonic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aside from pointing out the flaws in your analogy, and the fact a patch was released four months before this exploit arrived, I think you are overlooking the massive systemic benefits of homogeny.

      One could argue that computing and the Internet would not be as ubiquitous as they are today without having had a defacto standard. There is an even stronger argument at the cost savings to businesses and governments in not having to train and retrain new employees on how to use numerous computer systems.

      And as far as "companies getting taken offline," there is no excuse for leaving production systems unpatched for four months. Microsoft could not make it easier to apply security updates unless they came onsite and installed them for you. That's not as much a convicted monopolist issue as it is shoddy, lazy network management.

    15. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously the answer is to have a hundred different systems with a hundred different sets of vulnerabilities

      We already do, they're call users. I don't see that changing anytime soon, in fact it's likely that there will be many more in the near future.

    16. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      One could argue that computing and the Internet would not be as ubiquitous as they are today without having had a defacto standard. There is an even stronger argument at the cost savings to businesses and governments in not having to train and retrain new employees on how to use numerous computer systems.

      Standards != Monoculture.

      In fact a "defacto standard" is much less desirable than following well-documented, open standard protocols. The Internet was specifically designed to link disparate computer systems so that they could communicate properly.

      Having things only work properly on one "defacto standard" system limits the growth and ubiquity of things like the modern internet.

      And as far as "companies getting taken offline," there is no excuse for leaving production systems unpatched for four months. Microsoft could not make it easier to apply security updates unless they came onsite and installed them for you. That's not as much a convicted monopolist issue as it is shoddy, lazy network management.

      Agreed. The problem at hand is not so much companies getting taken offline because of direct infection, it is massive hordes of zombie PC's from home users to organizations too small to have dedicated IT staff. And that is something attributable to the crappiness of the system promulgated by the convicted monopolist.

    17. Re:Potato Blight for computers by hesiod · · Score: 1

      there is no excuse for leaving production systems unpatched for four months.

      We have a particular set of servers for an application, and the company that made the software in question (FujiFilm's Synapse PACS) does not want patches installed on those servers, or the workstations that run the client app until they confirm it doesn't conflict with their software. Thankfully, this particular patch was approved, but there are other MS patches that have not been approved in over a year (or there was when I last checked, anyway). Similarly, some other devices (like an Ultrasound machine made by Siemens) run software on top of a Windows OS, but the admins do not have administrator access to it, and installing updates could very well cause the device to stop working. It's not always quite as simple as you pretend it is.

    18. Re:Potato Blight for computers by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Except in such a case you just have to exploit one box and you get access to the rest. There went all your brilliant planning and schemes.

      No, you would probably just get access to the one box (and others identical to it). You generally would not get access to the other boxes, unless they share essentially the same vulnerability. GP's point was that a monoculture can be devastated by a single assault, but a mixed ecosystem is much more difficult to damage severely.

      Minor clarification of GP post: the potato crop in Ireland in the 1840s was dominated by a single variety of potato - the Lumper - which exacerbated the effect of a single strain of potato blight. The equivalent in computers would be all PCs running the same version of Windows with the same selection of programs, patches and protections: a disaster waiting to happen.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    19. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I run an unpatched machine with an obscure system that some friend of mine wrote. Probably anything but secure, knowing his code, but oddly, no spyware, no malware, no nothing. Why? Because it's no market either.

      When you have a hundred systems all having an equal market share, any given threat can only infect 1% of the existing machines (provided they are not binary compatible). That is economically uninteresting for the malware businesses.

      And yes, malware is a business. It follows the laws of capitalism. It is done if it is profitable. It is not done if it is not.

      There is a reason that we don't see many conficker-like worms for Linux Desktop machines, and the least reason is the better security. No system is secure if the admin (i.e. the average user) clicks "allow" on anything that wants in, configures his firewall so that "everything works" (read: pass through for everything) and uses root privileges for everything because "that way everything works".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Omestes · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't homogeneity, since if the full of the big three OSs carried a 1/3rd of the market, malware devs would just pick on and stick to it, evening out the load. this would actually make defense harder, since you'd have to cover all three.

      The problem is end users not knowing squat about security or safety (with a heaping helping of the main OS out there being rather patchy in security).

      With an educated user, most computers are almost completely secure. Most viruses, worms, etc.. rely on the user installing them, and not some large backdoor.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    21. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the famine in Ireland may also have been contributed to by the English landowners at the time exporting/eating all the good food.

    22. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      there is no excuse for leaving production systems unpatched for four months.

      We have a particular set of servers for an application, and the company that made the software in question (FujiFilm's Synapse PACS) does not want patches installed on those servers, or the workstations that run the client app until they confirm it doesn't conflict with their software. Thankfully, this particular patch was approved, but there are other MS patches that have not been approved in over a year (or there was when I last checked, anyway). Similarly, some other devices (like an Ultrasound machine made by Siemens) run software on top of a Windows OS, but the admins do not have administrator access to it, and installing updates could very well cause the device to stop working. It's not always quite as simple as you pretend it is.

      Those systems you mention should in no case be connected to the Internet. To do so would be just asking for it.

    23. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it would be worth it to see all the "I don't need to secure my computer, it's a Mac" crowd go down in flames screaming.
      Oh that reminds me - any Mac users want to buy my magical malware protection rock? Ever since I got the rock, no malware, so I KNOW it is working.

    24. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes Senator Quayle, immediately disconnect your potatoe from the intertubes.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    25. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Larry+Clotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, you would probably just get access to the one box (and others identical to it). You generally would not get access to the other boxes, unless they share essentially the same vulnerability.

      By "access" I didn't mean you would then have full access to everything on the network. By access I meant you would have an entrance point to the network and then would be able to access whatever other computers that the node you exploited has access to. Through that entrance point you would then be able to scan and attempt to exploit any computers it can access.

      GP's point was that a monoculture can be devastated by a single assault, but a mixed ecosystem is much more difficult to damage severely.

      So it is claimed, but there are numerous cases of people breaking through heterogeneous systems so this claim is a bit lacking.

    26. Re:Potato Blight for computers by MosesJones · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between standards and homogeneity. 802.11x is a standard but the market is far from homogeneous, in fact the best markets out there are those which have unified standards and multiple companies competing. Best for the consumer that is.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    27. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is the answer. How many cell phone viruses have you seen?

    28. Re:Potato Blight for computers by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      1) What good is a computer that spends its first two hours of operation scanning?

      2) If you could get everyone on a computer to run and maintain a (virus) scanner we wouldn't have this issue.

      3) What is this abundance of processing power and bandwidth you speak of? Hasn't Microsoft figured out how to make use of that and apply it to eye-candy?

      Consider it shredded. Improvements are difficult because they require solutions to existing problems. I just don't see what your system offers over the current model. Unless you were to say that M$ should run an anti-virus software and FORCE scans and updates. OR you're saying that all software should pass windows certification. Those are Fail and Fail, but pragmatically not bad ideas, just logistical nightmares.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    29. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Espinas217 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I run an unpatched machine with an obscure system that some friend of mine wrote. Probably anything but secure, knowing his code, but oddly, no spyware, no malware, no nothing. Why? Because it's no market either.

      When you have a hundred systems all having an equal market share, any given threat can only infect 1% of the existing machines (provided they are not binary compatible). That is economically uninteresting for the malware businesses.

      It is also uninteresting for software developers so you have a system without malware and almost useless because you just don't have any software to run on it. Also you can't comunicate with other peoples systems because yours is incompatible and different. Unfortunately the malware is the price we have to pay for having access to such a big network. If we had hundred different incompatible systems it would be a nightmare to write any software that runs on all of them (be it good or bad software). With some sort of common standard is easy (for certain values of easy) to develop software that can run everywhere, good software and evil software.

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
    30. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you get a Swiss Army Virus.

    31. Re:Potato Blight for computers by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are two programs included with Windows versions (XP and newer) that do pretty much this. sigverif.exe which verifies every file's signature, and sfc.exe which will compare installed Windows files against service pack files and will copy from OS media any files that have been changed or are missing.

    32. Re:Potato Blight for computers by mlts · · Score: 1

      This is what all OS makers bang into. The http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000347.html "dancing bunny" security hole. They can do their best, but if a user is determined to make a process run as root, they will, barring a "trusted" environment where even root/administrator doesn't completely control the system.

    33. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Nope. Ireland was a net exporter of food during the famine. The major cause of the Irish famine was politics.

    34. Re:Potato Blight for computers by downix · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be, as each coding team would have less varience to deal with.  Smaller, more tightly nitted teams often times can keep code patched far more effectively than shotgun approaches, trying to be everything for everyone.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    35. Re:Potato Blight for computers by socrates32 · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. The barrier to entry is low because there is only one set of tools needed to write effective viruses that target 95% of PCs. Coding viruses to target the top 5 platforms costs more. Targeting only the top 50% returns less. Either way, it makes writing viruses less profitable.

      --

      -- "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
      - Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
    36. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      I don't think you get it, or ever will.

      Also, it suffers from the same problem as the "broken window" fallacy. If we increase the heterogeneity of the network, we increase the cost for ALL developers, regardless of the color of their hat. Suddenly for legitimate software developers whose margins actually are razor thin, they have to deal with doubling, tripling, quadrupling development costs to reach the same audience. Big companies with big margins and regular blockbuster titles can afford that, but small players cannot. Actually, the irony is that only the mid-size players would suffer. Companies on thin margins competing with major corporations while trying to expand will perish or be purchased. Developers that stick to one platform as they do now (iPhone, Blackberry, Xbox Live Arcade, whatever) might eek out a living, maybe even be considered "well off," but again, good luck expanding and maintaining many platforms without investors and developers who have your back.

    37. Re:Potato Blight for computers by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Eh, thats not the broken window fallacy at all.

      The broken window fallacy relates to economic effect of doing harm purely to create work. It applies when work is created that has no positive effects (fixing a window that wasn't broken before).

      If a window is broken due to an accident, the broken window fallacy doesn't teach you not to fix it.

      Finally, how does anyone expand without investors and developers who "have your back"?

    38. Re:Potato Blight for computers by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Those systems you mention should in no case be connected to the Internet. To do so would be just asking for it.

      The PACS system needs to be accessible (sort of indirectly) from the Internet so that outside doctors can see the images and data stored on that server. And the second system needs to send data to the first, so they both must be on a network that is connected to the Internet.

    39. Re:Potato Blight for computers by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      One of the major causes of the Potato famine in Ireland was the reliance on a single product (the potato) and an inability to shift to a more varied diet.

      Well duh. We've goot woody, sarge, etch and now lenny; anybody still running potato must be nuts! These people should just upgrade and won't have to worry about Conficker any more.

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
    40. Re:Potato Blight for computers by westlake · · Score: 1
      One of the major causes of the Potato famine in Ireland was the reliance on a single product (the potato) and an inability to shift to a more varied diet.

      and the reason:

      The British colonized the Irish, transforming their countryside into an extended grazing land to raise cattle for a hungry market at home. The British taste for beef had a devastating impact on the impoverished and disenfranchised people of Ireland. Pushed off the best pasture land and forced to farm smaller plots of marginal land, the Irish turned to the potato, a crop that could be grown abundantly in less favorable soil. Eventually, cows took over much of Ireland, leaving the native population dependent on the potato for survival.

      Christine Kinealy, author of Irish Famine: This Great Calamity writes that Irish exports of calves, livestock (except pigs), bacon and ham actually increased during the famine. The food was shipped under guard from the most famine-stricken parts of Ireland. Great Famine (Ireland)

      Things like ILoveYou and Conflicker are preying on exactly the same homogeneous environment as they know that hitting one element yields massive results.

      The heterogeneous environment has its own costs.

      There are profitable niche markets but no true mass market. Hardware and software remains expensive and incompatible.

      The Apple II ended production with about five or six million units sold.

      It is only with Windows that it becomes meaningful to speak of a world in which the PC is everywhere.

      Hundreds of millions of units sold, perhaps 2 or 3 billion users.

    41. Re:Potato Blight for computers by rcharbon · · Score: 1

      So if we divided the market up in thirds between Windows, Linux, and Macs, knocking out only a third of the Internet wouldn't be a disaster?

    42. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Compatibility has nothing to do with susceptibility. How many fileservers running Samba are infected, despite being able to serve MS machines? Hell, how many Linux boxes are infected despite being able to communicate with MS boxes via TCP?

      You can make a system actually compatible and secure. Malware usually uses two possible entry points: System insecurity or admin insecurity. The first is entirely dependent on the system's developer. He can follow protocols, thus be compatible with other systems, and yet still make the system secure against this type of threat. He can even aid in the security of the admin, and while he cannot (or should not) keep the admin from running whatever software he pleases, the developer of a system can encourage safe behaviour. Like making running something with admin privileges an exception instead of the routine (so people do actually think before allowing something to mess with the system that shouldn't require that), or like a meaningful information and warning system that tells a user/admin that something tries to access things the system deems "critical" (and what, not just that something tried).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I've never seen it called that, but it's a very accurate description of this social engineering security hole. Promising the user something he wants will make him do anything. The more "hacking" the desired result requires (like, say, circumventing some DRM mechanisms), the less he will question an invasion in the system's security mechanisms. After all, those mechanisms are there to keep him from doing what he wants, right?

      And this is also why the idea of a "trusted" system will fail. Face it, it will be breakable. And people don't want a "trusted" system, mostly because any approach to a "trusted" system will invariably include not trusting the user/admin/owner of the box, and will most likely include something akin to TPC/DRM that he does not want. Many users will go and hunt for ways to get rid of it, and it shall be trivial for an attacker to lure a few of them into believing that following their steps (to get their malware onto the user's boxes) will offer what the user wants.

      A perfect example of what that blog called the "dancing bunny" sechole.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    44. Re:Potato Blight for computers by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Considering how many cross-platform development tools there are, targeting multiple platforms is pretty much free, though you are gonna have to ferret out the holes in the tools, but then again, there is more than one.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    45. Re:Potato Blight for computers by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      +1 Good Thing I Wasn't Drinking Coffee

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    46. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      There's a huge difference between the backing Blizzard has in branching out and hitting Mac and Linux (Wine) platforms, and supporting them, and what the real cost would be to an independent developer, and how difficult it would be to make that business case to investors and fellow developers.

    47. Re:Potato Blight for computers by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      It's related to the broken window fallacy. The idea of the fallacy is that you assume because money has changed hands that something good is accomplished, but that is illogical. We know that what we've done is divert money from one pursuit to another, one that takes food off a whole lot of other people's tables solely to benefit the glassmaker.

      So that's how I see this argument. Let's say instead of a rather homogeneous network of 94% Windows, 4% Mac and 3% Linux, we have twenty different OSes with 5% marketshare each.

      Now the people who make crossplatform development tools need to work about 6.6 times harder, as the number of people that can be dedicated to each platform has fallen by 85%.

      The people who make Wine probably would never have come about. It doesn't make sense to duplicate one OS's APIs because the amount of work involved is about the same, but the real gain is quite different. Instead of Linux (2-3% marketshare) being able to claim the same software compatibility as Windows (93% marketshare,) it'd be one 5% getting another 5%. And they'd have to repeat that amount of work 17 more times in order to claim the same level of compatibility that Wine does.

      So ironically, open source and cross platform development became exhorbitantly more expensive in terms of man hours in order to accomplish the same things.

      And that's with a mere 20 equally good operating systems on the market. That's still millions of PCs running any one OS, which is perfectly fine for the blackhats. Lucky for the blackhats: this heterogeonity hurts every other software industry, including antivirus companies who have to spread their resources over 20+ different platforms. They now get the ability to easily choose which platform is the least secure and least likely to have capable users sitting "between chair and keyboard."

    48. Re:Potato Blight for computers by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      That's why POSIX exists, AFAIK.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  7. actual article by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:actual article by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      also it looks like http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/ is down

    2. Re:actual article by DarrenBaker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Holy shit, I'm going to hide under my desk now. Call me when it's all over.

    3. Re:actual article by Shrike82 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is an extremely interesting development. One potential explanation is a DDoS attack from infected machines. Another option is simple coincidence and a technical problem with their hosting server.

      I suspect the former, but hope it's the latter.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    4. Re:actual article by dissy · · Score: 4, Funny

      also it looks like http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/ [confickerw...ggroup.org] is down

      I can still get to it... you must be infected!

      (Ok, ok, i'm just joking, it doesn't load for me either. It seemed a lot funnier when i first started typing it :P )

    5. Re:actual article by robthebloke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      or it's been slashdotted...

    6. Re:actual article by Shrike82 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, could be the case. I posted a link to it in another article a couple of days ago. Could I have brought down the Conficker Working Group page?

      Oh my god, am I behind Conficker?

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    7. Re:actual article by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 2, Funny

      His name is Robert Paulson

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    8. Re:actual article by buzy+buzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Holy shit, I'm going to hide under my desk now. Call me when it's all over.

      No Problem,

      I'll email you an attachment that will explain what happened and why everything is ok.

      Be sure to read it.

      --
      If you get modded down for a first post... What do you get for a last post?
    9. Re:actual article by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      It's asking me to enable my macaronis... Should I?

    10. Re:actual article by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      Careful, it could be spaghetti code.

    11. Re:actual article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's back up now -- 2.10 PM PDT. But no mention of the earlier downtime on the site, or any posts later than Apr 1. Hmm, how do we figure out if the site has been compromised?

  8. Narcoleptic virus? by Haiyadragon · · Score: 0

    Ssh! Don't wake it.

  9. Eye chart by Drakin020 · · Score: 5, Funny

    On a side note, that eye chart the Conflicker Group had up no longer works.

    http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/infection_test/cfeyechart.html

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Eye chart by JakartaDean · · Score: 4, Funny

      On a side note, that eye chart the Conflicker Group had up no longer works.

      http://www.confickerworkinggroup.org/infection_test/cfeyechart.html

      Works for me.

      --
      The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    2. Re:Eye chart by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      google cache still works.
      only the 3 important images will load though. if they don't you may be infected (or you may have a bad connection)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    3. Re:Eye chart by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      That seems to have gone over everyone's head.

    4. Re:Eye chart by deep9x · · Score: 1

      I found a mirror at this site: http://www.baylor.edu/its/security/conficker/

  10. I gotta ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why didn't someone infected with this, say last month, change their pc clock ahead to April 1 to see if it downloaded stuff or not? Then April 2, then April 3, etc.
    Duh.

    1. Re:I gotta ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Conficker gets it's time from a lot of different time servers, not the local machine. I think the author might have thought about that when designing the worm...

    2. Re:I gotta ask by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I think it has counter measures against it too. It is not a trivial VBasic junk. It is one of the most advanced professional worms to date.
      Even basic shareware has counter measures against messing with clock like that.
      Don't forget that it is not only local code, it gets payload with p2p. So if you can fool it with date, you won't be able to fool the host part.

    3. Re:I gotta ask by Z34107 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Conficker doesn't use the internal system clock; it polls various websites to find out the real date.

      If it can't connect to those websites, or gets an unexpected response, it assumes it's in a closed network and holes up.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    4. Re:I gotta ask by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why didn't someone infected with this, say last month, change their pc clock ahead...

      First of all, I'm sure that the payload itself wasn't made available until the last minute.

      Second, if it were me who wrote the virus, I would have written it to *start* looking for a payload, start looking in no particular place, and continue looking until it's been found. Considering that it's getting its payload from an established botnet, it could just be poking around looking for machines that can give it its payload and the payload wasn't made available until today.

      When you have control of as many machines as the Storm or Waledac botnets, the world really is your oyster. You're not restricted by IPs, and if your botnet is large enough, you can just iterate through addresses looking for a system that has your payload for you. Without access to the botnet or the payload, it doesn't matter how much you reverse engineer or adjust your clock, you just can't predict what will happen in the future.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    5. Re:I gotta ask by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Even basic shareware has counter measures against messing with clock like that.

      Yet somehow the windows vista beta didn't :o

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    6. Re:I gotta ask by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You certianly can man in the middle attack it. slowly skew the time with your own NTP server.. then look to where it's going to ask for it's next feeding and then attack that vector. and yes you CAN attack a P2P distribution vector.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:I gotta ask by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      It's not immune to re-casting those sites through a proxy and replacing the data, or stepping through a virtualised instance of its host in a hypervisor debugger.

    8. Re:I gotta ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      basic shareware

      I've had the Office 2003 "trial" on a computer for far more then 60 days. According to Office, it's August 24, 1995, well over a decade before I installed it on my computer.

    9. Re:I gotta ask by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The AC is confused though; researchers did all of that, they even have some sort of access to the randomly generated domain list (I get the impression that they have the algorithm, rather than doing some sort of playforward attack as is being discussed here) that is checked for downloads. The core issue is that there had not been anything to download, so all they were able to do was (potentially) confound the operators.

      I would go so far as to say that they have been attacking the p2p vector, but since it requires the cooperation of the administrators of the compromised machines, they didn't get very far.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    10. Re:I gotta ask by 2fuf · · Score: 1

      for the same reason you didn't, smartass

    11. Re:I gotta ask by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You have to understand the difference. On one hand you have software written by professionals with high skill, a good quality control, nice paychecks and other motivations, strict deadlines and a quite professional, ambitious and goal focused leadership.

      And then you pit that against MS. C'mon, be fair!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re:I gotta ask by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The date wasn't for when the payload would be available, it's when it would start looking for a payload. It could have been months if the creator wanted to wait that long.

    13. Re:I gotta ask by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      You are just bitter because Conficker has a higher market share than OS X and Linux combined. Don't be a hater!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:I gotta ask by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      So what your saying is that if we modified the conficker payload to be OS X or Linux, most windows users would be helpless/clueless and would end up using Linux/OS X? That my friend seams like a plan!

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    15. Re:I gotta ask by DeskLazer · · Score: 1

      It is one of the most advanced professional worms to date.

      are we talking about earthworm jim?

    16. Re:I gotta ask by dotgain · · Score: 1

      (I get the impression that they have the algorithm, rather than doing some sort of playforward attack as is being discussed here)

      Yes, the Conflicker Working Group have extensively researched and reverse-engineered most components of the worm, including the routines that generate the domain names that it will scan.

    17. Re:I gotta ask by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I think AV companies should really start separating ILOVEYOU type amateur malware from professionally written, money making malware. Besides not causing harm, they can even install a pirated version of Antivirus and can exclude itself from its scanner without user knowing anything just to get rid of rivals. Happened at least once last year. Something installed pirated Kaspersky, cracked it, removed all other infections except itself and uninstalled Kaspersky without the victim figuring anything. That is the "professional"(ly written) malware kind I am speaking about.
       

    18. Re:I gotta ask by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The only reason Conficker can't have a bigger marketshare than Windows is that no other system is susceptible to it, so by its very nature the machines infected by it are a subset of machines running MS Windows.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:I gotta ask by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Let's do it!
      *ducks*

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  11. Re:Blame Obama by Richard.g.k · · Score: 4, Funny

    See, if you're going to go all political and off-topic, you should at least try and make some sort of attempt to link it to the story at hand...

    for example...

    If you look at the facts the conficker virus and waladac botnet are CLEARLY parts of a vast left wing conspiracy which is obviously fronted by obama because the democrats want to take as much of your processing power as they do your income

  12. Re:Blame Obama by GreenTech11 · · Score: 3, Funny

    PLEASE, PLEASE mod parent funny

    --
    Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
  13. That's just ridiculous.... by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    One of the major causes of the Potato famine in Ireland was the reliance on a single product (the potato) and an inability to shift to a more varied diet

    No, the cause of the potato famine in Ireland was because the British deliberately starved the people. At the time, Britain had trading policies in place the prevented the Irish from actually developing their own economy. Do you think they wanted to eat nothing but potatoes? It was all they had.

    Now given that this homogeneity

    If you want to have more varied products, then you need to oppose free trade, and incidentally, open source. That way, you could encourage the capital formation necessary to create multiple, regionally designed operating systems.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your response is largely flamebait and somewhat simplistic. A quick review of Google provides a more comprehensive overview of the causes of the Irish potato famine. Yes, it was British policies but it wasn't trading policies as much as it was land ownership rules. And it wasn't as deliberate as you make it out to be.

      http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/historyonline/irish_potato_famine.cfm

      Your version reminds me of the stories that are told here in the U.S. about how evil the British were, and it gets embellished every time. No wonder the IRA had such an easy time funding their terrorist activities with U.S. dollars. About the only good thing to come out of 9/11 was the discontinuation of funding for the IRA now that American's finally saw what it was like to live under the threat of terrorism.

    2. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go then. Just the same as the Irish Potato famine, except that M$oft has brainwashed the population to believe they want nothing but Windows. What goes around, comes around.

    3. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think your anglophobic ranting has blinded you to the OP's statement and argument.

      One of the major causes of the Potato famine

      [emphasis added]

      The reliance on a single product - the potato - was unquestionably one of the major factors behind the famine. The fact that this reliance had socio-political factors as its root cause is totally besides the point. The fact is that the poorest people were reliant on the ubiquitous crop as their winter staple, and that ubiquity is what allowed one blight to cause such devastation. As you said yourself, it was all they had.

      It's a good analogy, and you've needlessly muddied the waters by misreading and over-extending the OP's point.

      Your suggestion that opposing open-source is a necessary step in increasing OS variety is weird and baseless. I'll grant you that completely free trade (as in "without restriction") would facilitate monopoly-practice and in turn engender a monoculture, which is how we found ourself in the current mess.

      To suggest open-source development discourages variety though...? Wow. What's your reasoning behind that posit?

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    4. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      to be fair, the British government didn't deliberately starve the Irish, instead they were proponents of 'free market forces'. They didn't have supermarkets or microwave readymeals in those days, so a staple foodstuff like the potato was pretty much all you ate anyway. Of course, if you were rich you could afford meat - like the cattle raised in Ireland for English tables. The landlords got richer and the poor stayed poor.

      The trouble was that the blight reduced the number of potatoes in circulation, and as other people were richer, they could afford to pay more - and so the farmers shipped their potatoes to the richer people, leaving the peasants to starve. As has always been the way.

      Incidentally the British didn't deliberately starve the people - after they'd woken up to the trouble, they did ship in large amounts of aid and close the ports to food exports. Too late for most of course, but don't get incompetence confused with conspiracy.

      There's been too much FUD about the potato famine, I suppose spread for modern political reasons. The truth is just dull, the government took a 'light touch' approach to the markets. Unfortunately this approach to 'hands off' free-trade doesn't give what society requires, with such lax input from governments, the free market doesn't always work correctly and you have monopolies appearing and abusing the freedom that should be providing a better set of choices. For computers, its no good saying "you could run Linux" if everyone needs to run Windows because of the ubiquity of software running on it.

      Protectionism is the last thing you want, when you get that, you invite stagnation. There's no innovation of growth, the established parties simply try to maintain their market with what they've got. Developing new products is a significant cost - and without free trade getting in the way and allowing new entrants to the market, there's no incentive to spend. Of course you might get new upstarts appearing, but that happens so rarely, and most of them are small and get killed off by the established big players either by being bought out (name any MS product really) or having their market destroyed (eg IE v Netscape).

      Ultimately the government needs to step in and support open standards, making sure everyone works with them. Then you can have much better spread of heterogeneous systems as they would work together, giving people the ability to choose an alternative to the dominant product.

    5. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by tjstork · · Score: 1

      Your suggestion that opposing open-source is a necessary step in increasing OS variety is weird and baseless.... o suggest open-source development discourages variety though...? Wow. What's your reasoning behind that posit?

      Because Open Source is standards based development encoded into the practice. Like, there's only one Linux kernel, only one C compiler, only one bash shell.. only one Perl, only one Java... the whole concept of Open Source revolves around a brief period of competition followed by universal adoption of one solution per a problem domain - mirroring current practices in the academic world. Even now, although Linux prides itself on having more than one window manager, things have coalesced around two, and one of those is not going to survive. So, really, to be open source, is going to ultimately reduce variety. The academic culture with Linux just doesn't see a point to continual competition, preferring consensus instead. Consensus means, everybody agrees on one.

      I'm sorry to point out the disadvantage of this approach, but ultimately, a lot of people, outside of this context, would actually hail this as an advantage.

      --
      This is my sig.
    6. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by sveinungkv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Like, there's only one Linux kernel, only one C compiler, only one bash shell.. only one Perl, only one Java...

      You are correct that there are only one Linux kernel, but there are other free UNIX kernels you could use instead. When it comes to compilers both LLVM and GCC are widely used. (LLVM is used in Gallum3D, the new acceleration architecture for X, and in Shark, a CPU agnostic JIT for OpenJDK. A C frontend not based on GCC is in development) There are many shells. Ubuntu, a quite popular Linux distro, actually uses dash as default /bin/sh. While it's true that only OpenJDK (if I recall correctly) passes the TCK for Java you also have competing implementations like Harmony, what Google uses on Android. You have more competition on the parts of the Java stack that takes less time to implement.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    7. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Wintermute__ · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree strongly with you here. You have it exactly backwards.

      Each example you give is dead wrong. One Linux kernel? Not so. One C compiler? Not even close. One bash shell? Nope, wrong again. Every one of those has more than one product line or version or competing product in wide usage, not to mention other complete alternatives, like using a BSD kernel in a Debian system.

      The "whole concept of Open Source" most certainly does not revolve around universal adoption of one solution to the detriment of any other. That's one great distinguishing feature of the open source model - choice.

    8. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be just one Perl, one Java, one Ruby, etc. but the fact that there are a number of different programming languages (in this example) leads to a number of different ways to perform any one task.
      I believe that consensus here means interoperability, not one-size fits all. There will always be new and different approaches to solving the same problem.

    9. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Protectionism worked for the US from the 1800's all the way up till the 1980's. We got to the moon using protectionism as an economic tool. I'm just saying.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    10. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Even now, although Linux prides itself on having more than one window manager, things have coalesced around two, and one of those is not going to survive.

      What gave you that idea? Gnome and KDE are very different window managers, and people have very different preferences when it comes to how they work with and access the applications that they really want to use.

      There will always be room for more than one desktop environment.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    11. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by pfleming · · Score: 1

      Even now, although Linux prides itself on having more than one window manager, things have coalesced around two, and one of those is not going to survive.

      What gave you that idea? Gnome and KDE are very different window managers, and people have very different preferences when it comes to how they work with and access the applications that they really want to use. There will always be room for more than one desktop environment.

      And there are waaay more than two window managers.

    12. Re:That's just ridiculous.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they just needed a potato futures market.

  14. Not "the" Ukraine by itsdrewmiller · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This isn't Vietnam. That isn't the preferred nomenclature. Just "Ukraine" like any other country, thanks!

    1. Re:Not "the" Ukraine by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "You know what the Ukraine is? It's a sitting duck, a road apple, Newman. The Ukraine is weak. It's feeble. I think it's time to put the hurt on the Ukraine."

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:Not "the" Ukraine by Itninja · · Score: 1

      modded redundant? the parent was the only reference to this, even at -1! maybe 'redundant' means something else in the China or the Russia

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  15. Clearly by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    That was the suggestion.
     

    --
    Deleted
  16. Ahhhhhh... by buttfscking · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sure is entertaining from over here on Linux Island! *sips drink*

    1. Re:Ahhhhhh... by tb3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Mac Archipelago finds it amusing, too. *Cheers!*

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:Ahhhhhh... by parkrrrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The parts of the Windows mainland who install security patches are also amused. I'm sure we'll all be amused right up until the Internet we all share with the infected losers goes all wonky.

    3. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Shrike82 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's good that this provides you with entertainment, it must get very boring over there when you can't play any games ;)

      Even though I'm joking, let the "Troll" modding begin.

      --
      You can advertise in this sig from as little as £99.99 a month!
    4. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My triple-booting Mac/Vista/Linux laptop is also amused (and clean on all partitions :D).

    5. Re:Ahhhhhh... by jimbolauski · · Score: 5, Funny

      Macs have games, Breakout, Super Breakout, ... Photoshop?

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    6. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be happy to join you as soon as I finish reading the mails from my fellow in Nigeria

    7. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Super Photoshop?

    8. Re:Ahhhhhh... by ancientt · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Windows 7 testing delegation would like to tell the Linux Island group to kiss [LOST CARRIER]

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    9. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Niris · · Score: 1

      sudo apt-get install wesnoth-all set for a good long time :D also, sudo apt-get install wine and install it through the !emulator

    10. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need video games! I've got Ruby!

    11. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Myrimos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget the Linux games!

      - Why Isn't My Wireless Working? (Fun for the whole family!)

      - Write Your Own Driver

      - rm -rf ~/* roulette

      - The Uptime Game (See how long your server's up! Prizes for +100 day or 6 sigma uptimes!)

      - Condescension (Make Windows users feel so bad about their OS they switch to *nix. Bonus points for Gentoo.)

      Anyway, Linux has tons of games for the creative and inquiring mind.

      --
      Internet scofflaw
    12. Re:Ahhhhhh... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really sucks. I can't even download that special plugin needed to view pr0n on my SCADA console at lunchtime. They don't support Linux. What were our execs thinking when they chose this O/S for systems at work?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    13. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Yosho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, don't knock it. Photoshop Hero is the best game ever.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    14. Re:Ahhhhhh... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Seeing how long you can use an Adobe product without getting a beach ball often resembles some sort of sick, twisted and abusive game much like playing Contra - you must know precisely when every event occurs, and if you fail once you get to go back a long way.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Ahhhhhh... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Oh, snap!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    16. Re:Ahhhhhh... by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Now you've done it. Now we'll get to hear the Linux folks wine about games some more...

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    17. Re:Ahhhhhh... by turing_m · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Fire Island was an archipelago.

      --
      If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
  17. Why the doom and gloom? by castironpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't anyone else curious to see what happens next?! I can just imagine millions of computer users starting their computers Monday morning and seeing their new goatse-themed desktop. Oh the lols...

    --
    mmmm...forbidden donut
    1. Re:Why the doom and gloom? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remove the stone of geek!...Append the stone of evil genius!

      Although if that does happen, expect a call from some well dressed men in a nice car, with blacked out windows, on Monday afternoon.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    2. Re:Why the doom and gloom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think it's pretty obvious what will happen next. The same old, same old. It's just yet another botnet that will be used mostly for sending SPAM and the occasional DDoS attack (against sites you probably have never heard of). Mostly this just means more SPAM.

    3. Re:Why the doom and gloom? by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      I sure am... technically the creator can now replace everyone's hosts file and create its own DNS that resolve to it's own IPs. Every 1 in 3 sites contains a goatse!

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    4. Re:Why the doom and gloom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nobody goes to this much trouble for a mass troll, much as I wish that was the case. If they only wanted to goatse ~10 million people they could have done so quite some time ago - they are in this for the MONEY. The most recent variant interacts with Waledac, a known spamming botnet, and is starting to install fake scareware "antivirus". Given its thorough rootkitting and stealth, the stealing of paypal credentials etc seems a likely future development, and finally let's not forget good old DDoS. It's an open secret that gambling sites pay extortion money, and there isn't a site on the planet that could withstand a full attack from this thing. Hell, they could take down whole tier 3 ISPs without much difficulty.

  18. Solution? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

    So if people get worms like this by being dumb with their computers, just write a worm that 'maliciously' enforces the security that people should be following. If you do it right it should infect the same set of people.
    Not being very knowledgeable in this area I don't know if this idea actually means anything or if its ridiculous enough to be funny.

    1. Re:Solution? by reashlin · · Score: 1

      You jest but AFAIK that is exactly what conficker does. On "install" it patches the vulnerability that it used as an entry door. A bit like a obber locking your front door behind them. At the very least is mean no other robber can come through the door and bother it.

    2. Re:Solution? by Ian+Alexander · · Score: 1

      IIRC it also opens other backdoors. So it would be like the robber locking the front door but making sure your windows aren't.

    3. Re:Solution? by cpghost · · Score: 1

      It actually happens all the time: worms and viruses often knock each others out, because each of them is competing for scarce resources (like outbound bandwidth, hooks to the keyboard etc.). There's no reason why a white-hat worm shouldn't exist. The Worm-Wars have already begun.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:Solution? by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      Bring me... the bore worms.

    5. Re:Solution? by dotgain · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and using 4096-bit signing to authenticate anything tossed in the windows.

    6. Re:Solution? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Do you mean something like "wget http://wubi-installer.org/latest.php"?

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  19. Waledac botnet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It has now downloaded components from the Waledac botnet, which could contain rootkit capabilities."

    How sad is it that we've got botnets we can't kill that hang on long enough to have names like glaciers?

  20. It has got self aware by hviniciusg · · Score: 1

    O my God, run it has got self aware

  21. Patch? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why would you need to patch if nobody has a clue about how to attack your system?

    well, actually you got a point but you come at it from the wrong angle.

    The problem is that thanks to the net, EVERY COMPUTER IS THE SAME. Internet capable...

    Effecticly, this is to sexually transmitted virusses as all of us screwing everyone else at the same. The internet is a gangbang of computers.

    What this leads to is that no matter how obscure your OS and the bugs on it, someone somewhere will know about it and have, thanks to the sheer size of the net, have thousands if not hundreds of thousands of targets.

    There may not be many amiga's left but if they were all infected, it would still be a nice botnet.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Patch? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is this sex of which you speak?

    2. Re:Patch? by Larry+Clotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why would you need to patch if nobody has a clue about how to attack your system?

      Because if even one system in your heterogeneous environment is exploitable you have just given them an easy backdoor to the rest of your system. If all systems aren't patched up you've only created a false sense of security and you've increased your maintenance costs many magnitudes higher for some "security through obscurity" scheme.

    3. Re:Patch? by hesiod · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because if even one system in your heterogeneous environment is exploitable you have just given them an easy backdoor to the rest of your system

      Sure, if your sysadmin is an idiot. If one box being compromised results in full access to all boxes on the network, your system is poorly designed. Unless, perhaps, that one box is an LDAP/AD server or something.

    4. Re:Patch? by Larry+Clotter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, if your sysadmin is an idiot. If one box being compromised results in full access to all boxes on the network, your system is poorly designed.

      Strawman argument. No where in my statement did I say anything about having full access to every other box on the network through that one node. But, once an attacker has an inlet into the network they can then move on to compromise other systems which may have greater access to other parts of the network. The simple fact of the matter is that the systems on the network are going to have to have some level of access to each other otherwise there is no point in networking them up together.

    5. Re:Patch? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Effecticly, this is to sexually transmitted virusses as all of us screwing everyone else at the same.

      I could make a really tasteless "screw the pooch" joke now concerning how to beat the STD problem, but I guess in the name of taste I'll abstain.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Effecticly? Is that like effectively eclectic?

    7. Re:Patch? by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Your argument is unrelated to hetero/homogeneous networks. As a matter of fact, it is a point where a heterogeneous network performs better.

      Because if even one system in your heterogeneous environment is exploitable you have just given them an easy backdoor to the rest of your system

      Sure, but if your environment is homogeneous, that reads:

      Because if even one system in your homogeneous environment is exploitable, they all are and you are totally fucked.

    8. Re:Patch? by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      Effecticly, this is to sexually transmitted virusses as all of us screwing everyone else at the same. The internet is a gangbang of computers.

      Just put a condom on your ethernet cable. That should stop the viruses for good.

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
  22. so much hype by zorkdork · · Score: 0

    in the end, just a waste of time.

  23. They should use conflicker to spread Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should use conflicker to install Linux to all infected Windows machine. LOL.

  24. anglophobic is stupid by tjstork · · Score: 1

    I think your anglophobic ranting has blinded you to the OP's statement and argument.

    There's nothing anglophobic about it.

    First off, I'm not expressing any kind of fear, therefor, there's no phobia. In fact, if someone says, they do not like gays, whites, or spiders, they are not homophobic, white-o-phobic, or spider-phobic. Dislike is not caused by fear. So let's burst that bubble.

    Secondly, merely stating history is, well, telling the truth. The British treated the Irish like dirt for a long time. I think they are a super ally to the USA and I would exclude them from any vision I have of an American withdrawal from NATO... the Continent can go do what it will, but the USA should always stand beside the UK just as much as the UK has stood beside us... not only in Iraq, but also in the Pacific during late WWII..

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:anglophobic is stupid by tygerstripes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're confusing etymology with definition. Anglophobia means "the hatred or fear of English people or culture", and most people take it to mean hatred more than fear since it's a much more useful definition. Bandying around sophistry to pick apart the language of an argument rather than its logic is weak, and never more so than when you're wrong.

      As for stating history: what the hell does that have to do with using, as a metaphor, the material fact of the blight's impact on a homogeneous crop? Did you even understand what the discussion was about, or did you just see "potato famine" and go off on a personal rant about historical socio-political oppression?

      Please, stay on-topic or be quiet.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
  25. Re:Blame Obama by slapout · · Score: 1

    You're new here, aren't you?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
  26. Windows for Warships - Vulnerable? by Tim12s · · Score: 1

    I'm sure these guys are vulnerable..

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/02/26/149209

    Submarines and gunboats running windows could easily have their network infected and will all be subject to zero-day vulnerabilities which is what these advanced botnets are starting to take advantage of.

    http://news.google.com/news?q=power+infiltrate

    With the possibilitiy of the power grid being infiltrated, it highlights that you need little more than a USB memory stick on an internal network to be infected.

    -Tim

  27. Install your OS fresh on every boot? by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Even with bittorrent...

    1) Booting when no network available?

    2) Spread viruses even faster if one or more of the seed machines is infected?

    3) Microsoft's new revenue model..

    1- Get people to download a new os each boot
    2- Be the only place to get it from
    3- Begin charging for each boot
    4- Profit

    1. Re:Install your OS fresh on every boot? by Niris · · Score: 1

      1- Get people to download a new os each boot
      2- Be the only place to get it from
      3- Begin charging for each boot
      4- Code in more reasons for automatic reboots and crashes
      5- Profit

      Fixed.

  28. Re:Blame Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow ! Thanks! I didnt know that.

    I'm going back to bed now...

  29. And what would you have Sys Admins do? by S7urm · · Score: 1

    I'm beginning to find it enormously frustraing that people, regardless of the topic, continue to piss and moan about problems that there is no realistic solution to. Whaa, the economy is bad, but people are too PC to put a significant Import tariff in effect, to balance out the "cost savings" of shipping our industries overseas. People complain about gun violence, but don't allow DC to ban handguns in the city (since there is SOOO much hunting on the Mall).

    This is the same scenario. You can't create a secure environment for networking computers because you need to have a set series of standards so that they can all communicate. You also can't put the genie back in the bottle, and take the prevalence away from Internet usage. So what are you left with? A set of systems that are easily exploited because they are all set to comprehend a common set of instructions.

    Why don't we quit the whining, and do away with this assinine concept of security, and understand that sandboxing, and ONLY sandboxing, will ensure the integrity of your valuable system's information and applications. That's it, so instead of worrying about being "secure" why not make it so nothing that can be gained from being exploited is worth the hassle?

    --
    "This is the value of a summer spent and a winter earned"
  30. Ever have one of those moments... by gillbates · · Score: 5, Informative

    When you realize you are uncontrollably in love with someone? That you and this person sitting beside you are soul mates? That you were meant for each other?

    That moment for me came a few weeks ago. Yes, my wife and I have been married several years, but she was a Windows user when we met. Sure, she'd grown up in a diverse family - both Macs and PCs, but most of her experience was on Windows.

    About a year ago I replaced Windows with Ubuntu on the family laptop. She kind of grudgingly went along with it.

    Then, last week we were watching the news when the anchor broke the story of conficker. Without missing a beat, she turned to me and in roll-your-eyes-I-can't-believe-they're-so-stupid kind of voice said:

    "That's a Windows thing, isn't it?"

    "Yep," I replied.

    "Hmmm. Sucks to be them, I guess..."

    Linux evangelists take note: sometimes it takes people *years* to come around. But when they do, when they realize they no longer have to WORRY about viruses and other Windows-specific crap, it's priceless.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Ever have one of those moments... by Angostura · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's actually one of the saddest thing I've read for a long time. I hope she never elopes with a Windows 7 install.

  31. Re:Blame Obama by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    No, this is Slashdot. And as you proved so eloquently yourself, you don't need to add anything relevant/funny/smart to the conversation to join in.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  32. a defacto standard. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "One could argue that computing and the Internet would not be as ubiquitous as they are today without having had a defacto standard"

    There is a defacto standard, it's called TCP/IP, SMTP and HTML

    "There is an even stronger argument at the cost savings to businesses and governments in not having to train and retrain new employees on how to use numerous computer systems"

    Invoking the ole cost of training FUD, I see

    According to DELL 'the fundamental approach to the design and use of Desktop Computers has not changed in 30 years'

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  33. Re:Blame Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the facts the conficker virus and waladac botnet are CLEARLY parts of a vast left wing conspiracy which is obviously fronted by obama because the democrats want to take as much of your processing power as they do your income

    But the truth is that the Obamanauts efforts have been secretly subverted by Cheney's government sleeper agents so that the extra CPU cycles can be used to run nuclear simulations for the next generation of mini-nukes!
    /and of course, the reptilians are running the whole show.

  34. hundreds of vulnerabilities .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "Yeah, because obviously the answer is to have a hundred different systems with a hundred different sets of vulnerabilities. That will be much easier to keep patched"

    Well, at least then things like Conficker would be stopped dead in their tracks, and a vulnerability in a particular system wouldn't lead to the kind of thing like the currrent virus/spam/phishing epidemic.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  35. Ridiculous or not. by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Incidentally the British didn't deliberately starve the people - after they'd woken up to the trouble, they did ship in large amounts of aid and close the ports to food exports.

    As you say, there has been a great deal of bunk written about the Hunger in Ireland in the late 1840s. However, you may have added to it.

    Irish ports were closed to food exports in the previous famine in 1783, but not at any time in the 1840s or 1850s. Ireland remained an exporter of food (mostly grain & cattle) in great quantity during the Hunger. What food aid arrived in Ireland was the result of charities, not the British government. In fact, the British attempted to prevent food aid from arriving from some other countries. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Irish_Famine

    There was also a lesser famine in Scotland at the same time, caused by the same over-reliance on potatoes which were hit by potato blight. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highland_Potato_Famine This caused great hardship in the Highlands, but food aid provided directly by the British government meant there were relatively few deaths from starvation or malnutrition-related diseases.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Ridiculous or not. by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      However, you may have added to it.

      yeah, I think I should have taken time with that post instead of clicking send so readily. Perhaps I should have refreshed my limited knowledge a bit on wikipedia first :-)

  36. Re:Blame Obama by HeavyDevelopment · · Score: 1

    Or it's a left wing plot hatched by Obama and Apple to sell more Macs and jump start the economy.

    --
    Badges!?! We don't need no stinking badges!
  37. Re:Car Thieves by Velska1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now that we're talking about car thieves;
    Once my car's fuel pump was busted, and I had been working with it since I tried in vain to start it.

    I accidentally left the keys in the ignition at night when I went in, and in the morning we had a visitor, who asked, "what happened to your car?" "Something happened?" says me, only then spotting the empty bay in front of the garage door (not really visible from inside).

    You imagine I was a little puzzled. There was no fuel pump in the car. How in heck had they driven off with it? Without really knowing what I was doing I started walking around the neighborhood, thinking they can't have gotten too far...

    About 150 yards out, around the corner, there was the car, complete with the keys in the ignition (including my house keys - how's that for stupid?), the hood still unlatched, with no other sign of tampering but a dirty palm print on the white hood.

    Turned out somebody had been waiting for us to go to bed. We had been sitting up till 2 AM right above the car bay, talking by an open window in the balmy summer weather. Whoever it was, had waited under the neighbor's shelter, smoking a crapload of cigarettes (~100 butts) - and taken a crap - to pass the time, then pushing the car out far enough so we wouldn't hear the starter grind.

    Big fat reward there. I hope they had a sense of humor! (I kind of figure if they didn't have one, they would have vandalized the car to "get back".)

    A bit offtopic, but I think it makes a good story.

    --
    Every problem has a solution that is simple, easy and wrong. Selling our Liberty for a little Security is a much too de
  38. C'Mon people by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going to post the obvious "SkyNet Lives" comment?

    What kind of geeks are you (we)?

  39. The Microsoft Guide To Conficker by westlake · · Score: 1
    The parts of the Windows mainland who install security patches are also amused.

    This is how Microsoft explains Conficker to the home user: Protect yourself from the Conficker computer worm

    Rather well done, I think.

  40. Where do we go from here? by westlake · · Score: 1
    It's good that this provides you with entertainment, it must get very boring over there when you can't play any games ;)

    Many a truth is spoken in jest:

    The elephant in the room is "games." If you buy a computer for fun, you probably want to play games on it, and you'll quickly learn that most halfway decent games don't run on OS X.

    Apple also seems to be addressing the wrong end of the market. It's producing multi-thousand dollar machines when it's the bottom end of the market -- filled with low cost laptops and netbooks that cost a few hundred dollars -- that's on fire at the moment.

    Apple's sales proposition seems to come down to this:

    * Windows is for boring business people, while OS X is for everyone else. Unless they want to play games. Or they don't want to pay inflated prices. Or they notice that there are far, far more applications to choose from on a PC than there are on a Mac.

    * OS X can do business too -- but not as well as a PC. But don't worry, you can buy Windows and run it on your Mac. Then it's just as good as a PC, just much more expensive.

    * OS X is really secure, although actually it turns out that it's not ...

    So it's not really that surprising Reuters reported unit sales of computers running OS X fell 16 percent in February, according to research group NPD, while Windows PC sales leaped 22 percent. Within that overall figure, MacBook laptops dropped 7 percent, while Windows laptops rose 16 percent. Windows desktops had a hard time in February, with sales down 10 percent, but OS X suffered even more with unit sales down a staggering 36 percent.

    Apple's Challenges: Gaming to Security [April 8, 2009]

  41. ISO 8601 in "a few countries" by tepples · · Score: 1

    The other nineteen twentieths mostly write it day/month or day/month/year, in the so-called "little-endian" form. The ISO 8601 standard is the "big-endian form" year-month-day which is used in a few countries.

    "A few countries" like Canada, Mongolia, Japan, both Republics of Korea, and both Republics of China. The use of forms like "2009-04-01" especially in East Asia takes a big chunk out of "the other nineteen twentieths", and you end up with a lot more than one twentieth who put the 4 before the 1.

  42. VMs might help by tepples · · Score: 1

    there will be viruses because people, dammit, want to see the dancing bunnies.

    That's what virtual machines are for. Run your personal entertainment in a separate folder from your business, and viruses that land in your entertainment VM can't easily cross to the business VM. Jeff Atwood agrees with me.

  43. THANKS!! by trick-knee · · Score: 1

    I was going to look through this and moderate, but you've saved me the trouble! this is exactly the type of cooperative community-minded effort that we so need.