Slashdot Mirror


US Military Issuing iPod Touches To Soldiers

644bd346996 writes "Newsweek has an article about the latest weapons in the US military's arsenal. The iPod Touch and the iPhone are being adapted as general purpose handhelds for soldiers in the field. 'Apple gadgets are proving to be surprisingly versatile. Software developers and the US Department of Defense are developing military software for iPods that enables soldiers to display aerial video from drones and have teleconferences with intelligence agents halfway across the globe. Snipers in Iraq and Afghanistan now use a "ballistics calculator" called BulletFlight, made by the Florida firm Knight's Armament for the iPod Touch and iPhone. Army researchers are developing applications to turn an iPod into a remote control for a bomb-disposal robot (tilting the iPod steers the robot). In Sudan, American military observers are using iPods to learn the appropriate etiquette for interacting with tribal leaders.'"

323 comments

  1. The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question is: are the military funded applications sold through the Appstore? Or is the US army jail breaking their phones? Or is Apple providing the military special unlocked iPhones?

    Perhaps Apple should consider rerunning their 'think different' campaign - this time with a sniper rather than Ghandi.

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:The real question is.... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The real question is: are the military funded applications sold through the Appstore? Or is the US army jail breaking their phones? Or is Apple providing the military special unlocked iPhones?

      Actually, I'd bet that Apple are providing the military with special phones that are locked to an "Apps Depot" where the military can make available special apps they've sanctioned. You don't want a piece of military hardware able to run any old dodgy thing sold through the app store, and you equally don't want the machine unlocked and potentially vulnerable when the soldiers install the latest piece of iPorn for Unlocked Phones that hits the bazaars. Remember the pirate DVDs/VCDs with viruses and rootkits and all kinds of other goodness on them that went through military laptops a while back?

    2. Re:The real question is.... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. More likely that (a) they're using Ad-hoc distribution and paying an appropriate license for it and (b) they're using unlocked phones (which aren't "special"--you can buy unlocked phones from Apple for $600).

    3. Re:The real question is.... by EvilIdler · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple has an enterprise program. You buy the $299 dev licence, and you can install to your own company/platoon/whatever's devices.

    4. Re:The real question is.... by rxan · · Score: 0

      The Army gets their apps from the Appory! Get it? Armory... Appory... OK, that was a horrible pun.

    5. Re:The real question is.... by astat · · Score: 1

      Now I am just waiting for the all-new camouflage edition.. oh, wait: just consulted google: http://www.threeskins.com/acatalog/camouflage-jungle-for-iPod-classic-nbd.html

    6. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seems to me like an ARM processor joke would have been more appropriate, something along the lines of: "I heard they got their iPhone processors from the... ARMory"

    7. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just putting it out to the slashdot audience: It's Gandhi, not Ghandi. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhi

    8. Re:The real question is.... by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Er... You know that Apple officially supports "Enterprise apps" on iPhone? Which is to say, privately developed apps available on an intranet "App Store". The bonus here is also that these apps do not require Apple approval, just the appropriate develpment licenses.

      Next time do a little research before getting sarcastic.

    9. Re:The real question is.... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      The real real question is: are the iPods and iPhones colored in desert camouflage?

      'Cause I want one if they are.

    10. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      In other news, taxes go up 400% due to extra military spending.

    11. Re:The real question is.... by YayaY · · Score: 5, Funny

      thanks, I'll be playing Tetris behind enemy line.

      --
      Votator.com implements a fair voting scheme (free
    12. Re:The real question is.... by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      probably just using the dev tools, and the iPod touch/phone imaging tool they provide us for schools.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    13. Re:The real question is.... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      Oh im sure that the folks from the Pentagram^h^h^h^hgon have some sort of site license and they have the phones locked to a depot or something

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    14. Re:The real question is.... by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      The real question is:

      No, the real question is what happened to Don't Pod, Don't Touch?

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    15. Re:The real question is.... by Old97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a Gandhi loving, walking and public transport (though a Prius would be O.K. if I had to drive), latte (no cream, please) sipping, Bush hating guy and I think this is great. I'm also an Army vet with an intel and law enforcement background. Did I mention that I'm also a big Obama supporter? Take your stereotypes and shove them where the sun don't shine (on your body).

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    16. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd bet that Apple are providing the military with special phones that are locked to an "Apps Depot"

      Bingo. That's got to be it. Apple aren't exactly publicing this tho' are they? Guess it won't go down to well with the Gandhi loving, prius driving, latte sipping, Bush hating segment of their user base.

      Awww, come on.

      US troops deserve the best.

      And that includes smug.

    17. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just checked - there are three different versions of BulletFlight available on the App Store - so I guess they are being sold through the App Store!

    18. Re:The real question is.... by thousandinone · · Score: 5, Funny

      shove them where the sun don't shine (on your body)

      Could you be more specific? This is slashdot, remember.

    19. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The real question is: are the military funded applications sold through the Appstore?

      Guess so BulletFlight is available in the AppStore for $29.99

    20. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better not be in Vatican then.

    21. Re:The real question is.... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be new to the internet. Anyone that's seen the Goatse man knows that the sun can in fact shine there.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    22. Re:The real question is.... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Now I am just waiting for the all-new camouflage edition

      Except Iraq and Afghanistan are desert tan, not jungle green. You're on the right track, though...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    23. Re:The real question is.... by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1, Funny

      You traitorous red scum.

    24. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, he didn't say where. And if you think goatse shows all the farther you can shove something in an ass, you lack imagination.

    25. Re:The real question is.... by kazzmedia · · Score: 1

      wow you really are whiney ...

    26. Re:The real question is.... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple aren't exactly publicing this tho' are they? Guess it won't go down to well with the Gandhi loving, prius driving, latte sipping, Bush hating segment of their user base.

      Like Old97, I'm another one who thinks Gandhi was a great guy, drinks lattes, despises Bush, drives a small fuel-efficient car, voted for Obama, uses Apple products ... and is a veteran. Infantry and medical in my case, including Desert Storm. Try wrapping your right-wing-chickenhawk, learned-about-the-military-from-FPS-games, Limbaugh-and-Fox-News-addled brain around that one.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    27. Re:The real question is.... by mi · · Score: 1

      You don't want a piece of military hardware able to run any old dodgy thing sold through the app store, and you equally don't want the machine unlocked and potentially vulnerable when the soldiers install the latest piece of [...]

      I suspect, you also don't want your source of military software to be equally available on all iPhones out there — such as Iranian and Russian ones in particular...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    28. Re:The real question is.... by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      Apple has an enterprise program. You buy the $299 dev licence, and you can install to your own company/platoon/whatever's devices.

      That's interesting. Does it also allow you to lock it down so that only sanctioned apps can go on it, or so that only fully approved updates can be installed? They're the kind of features I'd be looking for if I had to approve the phone or touch for military applications.

    29. Re:The real question is.... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Better not be in Vatican then

      First you get down on your code

      Optimise that solar node

      Point it where the sun don't go and

      write a hack write a hack write a hack!

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    30. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm a Gandhi loving,

      There's not many who truly love Gandhi & respect his teachings who see militarisation of an entertainment device as 'great'.

      I'm prepared to believe you're the exception to the rule tho'.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    31. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Try wrapping your right-wing-chickenhawk, learned-about-the-military-from-FPS-games, Limbaugh-and-Fox-News-addled brain around that one.

      Gosh! Stereotype v Stereotype! For the record, I'm too old for FPS & am not American, so have never watched Limbaugh / Fox news....

      And I like Gandhi, Lattes, small cars, etc.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    32. Re:The real question is.... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

      you also don't want your source of military software to be equally available on all iPhones out there...

      Well, that might make their job more interesting if both sides have to game each other for control of a bomb-carrying robot. Sort of like a combination of Russion roulette and arm-wrestling... ;-)

    33. Re:The real question is.... by Werrismys · · Score: 1

      BulletFlight has been on apple store for months.

      But I recommend 'Ballistics', it's more versatile and the Field Edition has BulletFlight-style simple HUD mode.

      --
      'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
    34. Re:The real question is.... by xalorous · · Score: 1

      It still should be "Think differently."

      --
      TANSTAAFL GIGO Acronyms to live by!
    35. Re:The real question is.... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      I'm another one who thinks Gandhi was a great guy, drinks lattes, despises Bush, drives a small fuel-efficient car, voted for Obama, uses Apple products ... and is a veteran.

      I don't mean to insult or trivialize your service to your country, but the image of 'the soldier' I always see is a very Conservative, right-wing man. even documentaries like 'the war tapes' that were filmed by by the soldiers themselves portray soldiers as right-wingers.

      Were your political view very much an exception to the norm? was it a much more even mix than the media portrays? or is politics something soldiers just don't talk about.

      on topic:
      as much as I make myself out to be an apple hater, the ipod touch and iphone are both very well-built, well-designed products. if they can save resources or more importantly, lives, it is a great investment. I imagine having a standardized interface for many different kinds of equipment would also be a great advantage for training.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    36. Re:The real question is.... by itsphilip · · Score: 1

      At least THAT wouldn't be gay

    37. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Reread the question you quoted [emphasis mine]

      The real question is: are the military funded applications sold through the Appstore?

      In that light, your answer is incorrect.

      Guess so BulletFlight is available in the AppStore for $29.99

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    38. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      wow you really are whiney ...

      Well, I am a mac fanboy - its our 'thing'.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    39. Re:The real question is.... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Were your political view very much an exception to the norm? was it a much more even mix than the media portrays? or is politics something soldiers just don't talk about.

      Come on man, you know the drill...don't ask, don't tell.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    40. Re:The real question is.... by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fuck Gandhi. Duder killed his wife. Penicillin would have likely saved her but he pulled the ol' "she's in God's hands" bitch maneuver. Then when illness came for him, he was on the meds like a dope fiend.

    41. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ipod may be a remote bomb detonator. You will need to hand that over before boarding the plane. Thank you for cooperating with TSA.

    42. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends if it's mahatma or indira, really...

    43. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is limited to distribution on 500 devices though.

    44. Re:The real question is.... by MedeaMelana · · Score: 1

      You certainly cannot let the sun shine everywhere on your body at once.

    45. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The apps are sandboxed. As a condition for acceptance in the App store, they cannot access another app's data. Now, if the user were to install something trojan through the enterprise program or a beta that was signed using their device serial number, that is a different story, but much harder to do.

    46. Re:The real question is.... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "this time with a sniper rather than Ghandi."

      "I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence... I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor." Gandhi goes on further to state "But I believe that nonviolence is infinitely superior to violence, forgiveness is more manly than punishment. Forgiveness adorns a soldier...But abstinence is forgiveness only when there is the power to punish; it is meaningless when it pretends to proceed from a helpless creature....".

      http://www.abhijeetsingh.com/blog/archive/2006-06-09/Indians_for_guns

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    47. Re:The real question is.... by Old97 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a Gandhi loving,

      There's not many who truly love Gandhi & respect his teachings who see militarisation of an entertainment device as 'great'.

      I don't see that as in consistent. I don't agree that Gandhi's approach works everywhere with everyone under all circumstances. His approach of passive resistance works best when confronting a nation of people who see themselves as civilized and decent so it worked against the British. Martin Luther King used Gandhi's approach in the U.S. and that worked well. If the Irish Catholics' resistance to Britain followed Gandhi instead of the IRA, the troubles would have ended sooner and more easily. If the Palestinians used Gandhi's approach against Israel instead of following the PLO there might now be one secular state where people of all denominations were equal.

      I don't think Gandhi would have been successful against Hitler or Stalin or Mao. They would have killed him and moved on. There is a time for fighting.

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    48. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary.

              --Mahatma Gandhi

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    49. Re:The real question is.... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a Gandhi loving, walking and public transport (though a Prius would be O.K. if I had to drive),

      Somewhat offtopic, but the Toyoa Prius - whilst a clever piece of kit - is actually much worse for the planet than a 'normal' small car. Takes more energy to produce than a Hummer, just for starters... Buy a small, locally-produced diesel if you want to save the planet...except you're SOL because Detroit don't make one you'd actually want to buy.

      Oh, BTW, before I get flamed to hell, I'm a big believer in our need for alternative energy solutions but...let's get the facts straight.

    50. Re:The real question is.... by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 1

      You can get lattes with cream????? Why the hell would you want to put cream on a latte?

      --
      We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
    51. Re:The real question is.... by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Actually, the real question is: what are the contract conditions for getting the free iTouch or iPhone?

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    52. Re:The real question is.... by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1
    53. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a stupid mother fucker!!!!

      The fucking article says its a ipod touch not a god damn iphone.

      How bout you take time to read you mother fucking idiot!

      I so wish you were here I would fucking slice your fucking throat open and laugh at you as you bleed out!!!!

    54. Re:The real question is.... by icebrain · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that app was originally developed for competitive shooters in the civilian world. While the equipment and techniques may be different, the same principles of ballistics and physics apply to military/police snipers as to benchrest shooters. Calculating things like windage and bullet drop for a given round based on wind, barometric pressure, and temperature (like this app does) applies just as much to military use as to long-range target shooting and hunting.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    55. Re:The real question is.... by astat · · Score: 1

      Sucking up my mod points, will you? But I got it under control: https://www.inspire4less.com/productimages/0009990052603.jpg

    56. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you have my respect and gratitude for your service and insight, as a Gandhi-loving, Prius-driving, cappuccino-sipping, Bush-hating Obama supporter who has nothing but admiration for those who volunteer to serve their country.

    57. Re:The real question is.... by tomservo291 · · Score: 1

      iPhone/iPod Touch dev already supports ad-hoc distribution. The army wouldnt need any special privileges to do this, you or I can do it right now.

    58. Re:The real question is.... by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      You can appreciate quite a lot of a person's philosophy without thinking that they were wrong about a few things.

      For example, I an appreciate Gandhi's stance on peaceful resistance, but I disagree with him on preferring to let his family die than to have doctors use animal byproducts to save them. (FYI They went ahead with the procedure against his wishes).

    59. Re:The real question is.... by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Ballistic: Field Tactical Edition ($9.99) is as good? I know....at 1/3 the price the military would never go for it.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    60. Re:The real question is.... by xdor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're an Obama supporter, but you have a background in intel?

      How do you feel knowing he would sell you out for the upper hand in a first-round lawsuit?

      Or perhaps your intelligence is merely for your own political safety?

      vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

    61. Re:The real question is.... by Poltras · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can do whatever you want. You don't have an EULA with the enterprise program. Apple told us so when we were looking to reverse some API to obtain cell towers informations. We wanted to be legit and know Apple's opinion; they told us we could do it with their enterprise program, but we'd be limited to iPhones which have the correct certificate (registered with the iPhone enterprise manager).

    62. Re:The real question is.... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I think this is limited to distribution on 500 devices though.

      No, it's for companies with 500 or more employees. You've got it confused with 100 devices for Ad Hoc distribution.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    63. Re:The real question is.... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      You mean sort of like what Bush Co. did to Valerie Plame?

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    64. Re:The real question is.... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      "In 1906, after the British introduced a new poll-tax, Zulus in South Africa killed two British officers. In response, the British declared a war against the Zulus. Gandhi actively encouraged the British to recruit Indians. He argued that Indians should support the war efforts in order to legitimize their claims to full citizenship. The British, however, refused to commission Indians as army officers."
      Not even Ghandi lived in a black-and-white world like you do.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    65. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, you're gay, unemployed, and ignorant. grats!

    66. Re:The real question is.... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The real question is: are the military funded applications sold through the Appstore?

      Guess so BulletFlight is available in the AppStore for $29.99

      Hey, once the TEA partitioners got the "no more tax" and "more defense" wishes, guess how the Armed Forced will finance itself?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    67. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's not many who truly love Gandhi & respect his teachings who see militarisation of an entertainment device as 'great'.

      He was talking about the movie.

    68. Re:The real question is.... by anagama · · Score: 1

      Made with half and half, but close: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caffè_breve

      Not a little half and half, replace the volume of milk with it. Very good and very bad.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    69. Re:The real question is.... by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

      They're delivered ad-hoc to the phones. There's an option to distribute them ad-hoc.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    70. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does the day star shines into basements?

    71. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (citation needed)

    72. Re:The real question is.... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Ugh... That was bad enough to disARM you when you saw/heard it.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    73. Re:The real question is.... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      In many cases, there'd be no room for them because there's already something there...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    74. Re:The real question is.... by Numbstruck · · Score: 1

      I didn't really buy it when I first saw that story. It appears there's been enough time for someone to look it over and see that it wasn't completely on the level.

      From:

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-9750840-1.html

      Direct Link:

      http://www.pacinst.org/topics/integrity_of_science/case_studies/hummer_vs_prius.pdf

    75. Re:The real question is.... by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that - but note I said 'produce', which is correct IMHO.
      Nobody is their right mind would buy & drive & Hummer, of course, so the mileage calcs are ingenuous.

      As I said in my parent, buy a small diesel - best of all, second hand - if you want to save the planet and your cash. Then run it on old cooking fat from your local restaurent that would otherwise be tipped in the drains or expensively shipped somewhere to be recycled.

    76. Re:The real question is.... by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

      The applications are distributed via the ad hoc method. There's nothing special about this at all, it's been around since day one..

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
    77. Re:The real question is.... by WillyDavidK · · Score: 0, Troll

      up your ass

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
    78. Re:The real question is.... by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      Or

      "US Military breathes new life into the ARMs race."

    79. Re:The real question is.... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      someone provide him with a goatsee link...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    80. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Do you believe that Gandhi would have thought the militarization of an entertainment device was 'great'?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    81. Re:The real question is.... by daybot · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not Tetris. You just ordered air support to bomb your location...

    82. Re:The real question is.... by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      Can 'one' iPod connect to more than one 'store'?

      I just think that this might be a way of providing/selling applications to end users that Apple would normally ban from their own store.

    83. Re:The real question is.... by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      If you'd read the thread before replying, you'd know that the ad hoc method is limited to 100 users.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    84. Re:The real question is.... by Old97 · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you keep harping on this, but I'd think he'd be more concerned about the making entertainment out of military devices and activities - which is what most games do. Using an iPod as a portable computer during war doesn't lead to warlike tendencies. Does playing at warfare or murder (e.g. first person shooter games and all the games about war and combat)?

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    85. Re:The real question is.... by nitroyogi · · Score: 1

      Its 'Gandhi' ... not 'Ghandi'!

    86. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      completely off topic... I read your username as whitey mc fagboy.

    87. Re:The real question is.... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I believe he would have thought you are a really tragic case.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    88. Re:The real question is.... by xdor · · Score: 1

      You mean sort of like what Bush Co. did to Valerie Plame?

      "According to sources used by a Washington Post article"
      "According to claims made by a former official at The Times"
      "According to a description provided by a Los Angeles Times reporter"

      The broad release of specific operational material announced by the President himself sends the wrong message to all our agents and any present or future threats.

      I think there is a real difference.

      But despite how it was done, I am glad that water-boarding is now off the table.
      Since this government has decided to classify right-leaning persons as terrorists, at least I can now hope I won't be badly treated when imprisoned for my thought crimes.

    89. Re:The real question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If the Irish Catholics' resistance to Britain followed Gandhi instead of the IRA, the troubles would have ended sooner and more easily."

      They tried peaceful. The unarmed marchers at the front got shot and killed by British Army snipers. It's called "Bloody Sunday". Perhaps you've heard of it?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloody_Sunday_(1972)

    90. Re:The real question is.... by Serious+Callers+Only · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that - but note I said 'produce', which is correct IMHO. Nobody is their right mind would buy & drive & Hummer, of course, so the mileage calcs are ingenuous[sic].

      So your stats are meaningless. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

      A car is for driving around in, so energy economy is really quite important over the lifetime of one you buy intending to use, as opposed to hardly ever drive. After a while the efficiency (or not) of the manufacture pales into insignificance in comparison to how much it costs to drive, and the cost to the climate of lots of people doing the same.

      Sure, a Prius depends on electricity generation which is clean, so at this point in time it isn't much better for the environment than a normal car (unless you have off-grid power), but to compare it to a Hummer is disingenuous if not downright misleading.

    91. Re:The real question is.... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.
          Mahatma Ghandi, "Gandhi, An Autobiography", page 446

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    92. Re:The real question is.... by RyanPMcBride · · Score: 1

      Connectivity aside, the whole thing just seems unnecessarily expensive. You'd think the defense department would be able to come up with their own proprietary solution.

  2. The EULA by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You also agree that you will not use these products for any purposes prohibited by United States law, including, without limitation, the development, design, manufacture or production of missiles, or nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

    We've all had a good laugh at that clause but they may actually be close to breaching it.

    1. Re:The EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Apple couldn't possibly give the US government a different EULA???

    2. Re:The EULA by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I doubt that US law prohibits the military from developing missiles.

    3. Re:The EULA by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

      They're military, they might not even necessarily have to obey any EULA.

      In theory, the feds could invoke eminent domain and force Apple to sell the IP rights if necessary.

      So Apple has every incentive to be accommodating to their needs...

      But most likely they just buy the DISTRIBUTION certificates from Apple, as any developer could, so they can sign and deploy their own apps on their own without necessarily having to put anything on the app store.

      Not all apps are necessarily public.

    4. Re:The EULA by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      That clause says nothing about using the products to support the use of such weapons.

    5. Re:The EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, operation is not the same as production.

    6. Re:The EULA by tyrione · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're military, they might not even necessarily have to obey any EULA.

      In theory, the feds could invoke eminent domain and force Apple to sell the IP rights if necessary.

      So Apple has every incentive to be accommodating to their needs...

      But most likely they just buy the DISTRIBUTION certificates from Apple, as any developer could, so they can sign and deploy their own apps on their own without necessarily having to put anything on the app store.

      Not all apps are necessarily public.

      Wrong on too many levels. Your rationale with eminent domain has massive holes in it, never mind the Federal Military Top Secret IP angle. By the way, NeXT had a long history with the CIA. We worked for probably 15 years and continued after the Merger. There were custom builds for a client's need for a massive price.

    7. Re:The EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In theory, the feds could invoke eminent domain and force Apple to sell the IP rights if necessary."

      Not really. Not only would that set a bad precedent. The military really doesn't need to purchase the IP rights since they're not producing anything for the general public.

    8. Re:The EULA by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

      I doubt that US law prohibits the military from developing missiles.

      Shhhh. Don't mention the NSA's issuance of iPods with their custom iTap software.

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    9. Re:The EULA by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Eminent Domain really isn't going to be invoke for IP rights. They are the military and with just a few calls and the IRS shows up for an unannounced audi, some info on Jobs health is "leaked" to the press., a few guys with really short hair start stalking the execs, a few black helicopter buzz low over the building and an urban warfare "exercise" is scheduled near the Apple campus...but really the Government just pays for, out the ass, for the special rights to the IP of the iPhone as needed. Why cut off a very good customer who will pay a LOT more than anyone else for something they really want? You'd be amazed that the behind the common everyday logo hides some really high-tech gear when it is in the hands of the DOD.

    10. Re:The EULA by Nutria · · Score: 1

      the development, design, manufacture or production of missiles, or nuclear, chemical or biological weapons.

      We've all had a good laugh at that clause but they may actually be close to breaching it.

      Even a commie pinko bastard (like I am assuming you are) should be smart enough to realize that sergeants in the field with a rifles are in no way developing, designing, manufacturing or producing missiles or NBC weapons.

      Besides, that EULA restriction is probably necessitated by law, since the computers which design such weapons need to be connected to classified networks.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    11. Re:The EULA by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but there was a time when troops marched a sang some kind of tune, usually having little or no respect for anything. What does the UMCJ state about quiet marching troops showing up after listening to Gangsta'RAP?

    12. Re:The EULA by Toonol · · Score: 1

      None of that is necessary. You think Apple wouldn't be happy to sell to the Military? Of course they would be.

    13. Re:The EULA by the_xaqster · · Score: 1

      I would LOVE for someone to show up at my house with an unannounced Audi. Especially if it is the R8!

      --
      I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
    14. Re:The EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if it is related, but I was always intrigued by the following legal disclaimer I've seen.

      Use, duplication, or disclosure by the US government is subject to restrictions as set forth in sub-paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause in DFAR 252.227-7013. Non-DOD rights in FAR 52.227-19(c)(1,2).

    15. Re:The EULA by mgblst · · Score: 1

      This would be a big move, and they aren't going to do it just to save a few bucks.

      Anyway, we all know that Microsoft would have no problems with death and destruction, they could just use their shitty devices.

  3. What's next? by Alsn · · Score: 5, Funny

    For all your warfare needs, iWar includes anything a soldier needs! Ballistics calculations for artillery, able to say "we mean no harm" in fourhundred and twenty six different languages, a full guide of where to find usable drinking water and much much more. Subscribe now and you'll get free add-ons for a full six months! iWar, saving the lives of soldiers not near you!

    1. Re:What's next? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 5, Funny
      Have the desire to visit a foreign nation, meet interesting people, and kill them?

      There's an app for that!

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:What's next? by ptelligence · · Score: 1

      Maybe it can use Bluetooth or Wifi to detect IEDs! (Inspiron Exploding Dells)

    3. Re:What's next? by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      ... able to say "we mean no harm" in fourhundred and twenty six different languages,

      Actually, the iTranslate application just presents the following dialogue:

      Speak Louder. If that doesn't work, they are probably al qaeda.

    4. Re:What's next? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Don't be sarcastic. Iraq war would have been very different if the GIs had a correct internationalization feature.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:What's next? by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      At least it's not an MS product, or we'd have clippy going:
      "Hi it looks like you're trying to prosecute the War on Terror(TM), would you like help to:
      *Lie to the public
      *Ignore the UN or
      *Make unconstitutional laws

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    6. Re:What's next? by msormune · · Score: 1

      How about iPineApple - next generation hand granade.

    7. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the same time 1/5 of the Earth's population live on less than $1 a day.

    8. Re:What's next? by noppy · · Score: 1

      iPod mounted guns

      M-m-m-monster kill !!!

    9. Re:What's next? by emacsisforbabies · · Score: 1

      "Shoot. Kill. Burn"

  4. Well, I guess this proves it. by koterica · · Score: 1

    Apple is evil after all.

    I wonder if you can get these apps from the appstore?

    1. Re:Well, I guess this proves it. by JustOK · · Score: 1

      oblig iKill

      but will it be DRM free?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Well, I guess this proves it. by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're working on a french version. It will be called the iSurrender.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Great idea by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not. Unless they are getting milspec units I wonder how many lives are being put in danger by using consumer products in such varied environments. The mountains of Afghanistan in winter and the deserts of Iraq are probably both well outside of the rated range of these devices. Not only that but what happens when they get a little wet? I think the average joe shmoe probably treats his electronics a bit better than your average grunt. I personally love the idea of using something like this to control things (my wife has a sewing machine that uses a gameboy color for a controller), I'm just not soldiers are the best target audience for such efforts.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Great idea by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you understand the concept of 'disposable'? There won't be classified information on these things (that's on the network). When they break, you toss 'em. I don't have a link at the moment, but military personnel have been using consumer GPS units since the war broke out.

      A mil spec iPod would be too heavy to move without a Humvee and too expensive to give to anyone under the rank of Captain.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Great idea by LoRdTAW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your average grunt is joe schmo. I have a few friends who all served in Iraq. All of them had electronic gadgets to help pass the time. They had ipods, laptops, digital cameras, hand held gaming systems etc. One of my friends bought his fancy $2000 digital SLR and it survived no problem. One friend did have his mp3 cd player broken when some guy was throwing rocks at him. Other than that all their gadgets made it back just fine. BUT I am not suggesting Ipods and the like are battle field ready gear. Maybe Apple will team up with a military contractor to provide mil-spec units if they prove to be useful.

    3. Re:Great idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      How disposable is the device if you are in the field relying on it to bring back realtime intelligence from a drone? The problem is that you have a very expensive information collection system built to battle standards and tactics built around those systems and then you cheap out on the part that makes the information actually usable. Like normal this is the brass crapping on the guy in the field after spending trillions of dollars on the toys. Who's brilliant idea was it to build the modern information centric battle systems without designing a milspec general purpose computer for the field soldiers?!? Oh yeah they canceled that in 2007 after completely screwing up the process from design to implementation (land warrior).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Great idea by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This kind of case is what the iPods get put in. I'd say they're probably close enough to mil spec that it makes the iPods clearly more cost effective. It's not like iPods are particularly fragile to begin with - once you protect them from moisture and sand, the only significant vulnerability that remains is the touch screen itself, which is easily protected with a flip cover. I doubt that temperature is much of an issue, given that they are all solid-state devices.

      Another example of an enclosure is this one, for the first-gen touch, shown at the bottom of the page with an attached sniper rifle. This is clearly one of the best-protected iPods in the world. If you read more on that site, you'll see that they have done plenty of testing to ensure that the iPod can survive the shock of the attached rifle being fired numerous times.

    5. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I washed and dried my Ipod nano, and it has continuted to work fine for years!

    6. Re:Great idea by TubeSteak · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not. Unless they are getting milspec units I wonder how many lives are being put in danger by using consumer products in such varied environments.

      Soldiers have been using consumer grade electronics in the field for a very long time now. Army procurement in Iraq & Afghanistan is glacial at best and more often than not, its easier to order something stateside and have is shipped over either by the company or your family.

      And now for a tragedy in two parts:
      Date: December 2004
      Setting- SecDef Rumsfeld is taking questions from 2,300 soldiers in a hangar at Camp Buehring, Kuwait.

      Part 1.
      Army Spc. Thomas Wilson: My question is more logistical. We've had troops in Iraq for coming up on three years and we've always staged here out of Kuwait. Now why do we soldiers have to dig through local landfills for pieces of scrap metal and compromise ballistic glass to up-armor our vehicles and why don't we have those resources readily available to us?

      [Applause from the soldiers]

      Sec Def Rumsfeld: I missed the first part of your question. And could you repeat it for me?

      Army Spc. Thomas Wilson: Yes, Mr. Secretary. Our soldiers have been fighting in Iraq for coming up on three years. A lot of us are getting ready to move north relatively soon. Our vehicles are not armored. We're digging pieces of rusted scrap metal and compromised ballistic glass that's already been shot up, dropped, busted, picking the best out of this scrap to put on our vehicles to take into combat. We do not have proper armament vehicles to carry with us north.

      Part 2.
      Sec Def Rumsfeld: I talked to the General coming out here about the pace at which the vehicles are being armored. They have been brought from all over the world, wherever they're not needed, to a place here where they are needed. I'm told that they are being - the Army is - I think it's something like 400 a month are being done. And it's essentially a matter of physics. It isn't a matter of money. It isn't a matter on the part of the Army of desire. It's a matter of production and capability of doing it.

      As you know, you go to war with the Army you have. They're not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time.

      The End

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    7. Re:Great idea by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      What kind of design deficiencies would you expect to find in an iPod touch that make it less suitable than a device designed from the start to have battlefield durability? I'd bet the only thing between the iPod touch and mil spec certification is a testing regimen. I'd also bet that the iPod touch would be at least as durable as any device of comparable utility with a cost within an order of magnitude of the iPod.

    8. Re:Great idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      Nah, I doubt they use extended temperature components or water tight seals everywhere like a milspec unit would.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Great idea by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      The important thing to keep in mind here is that equipping our troops with the iPod Touch and iPhone provides them with something that no other technology can: that smug, hipper-than-thou sense of superiority that comes with being an Apple user. If Al Qaeda and the Taliban are still using Microsoft products, then their morale will suffer because they don't have the latest, cutting-edge gadgets, and they will lose tactical effectiveness on the battlefield.

    10. Re:Great idea by bryanp · · Score: 1

      A mil spec iPod would be too heavy to move without a Humvee and too expensive to give to anyone under the rank of Captain.

      Cute, but you can buy consumer cell phones that meet mil spec for shock, dust, etc.. I have one now and I'm about to get a new one. (the old one still works, but I've had it several years now and want something a bit newer.) They aren't much bulkier or heavier than the non-rugged counterparts, and aren't significantly more expensive either.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    11. Re:Great idea by kaikane · · Score: 1

      OOOOhhhh. Just think of all those "disposable" iPhones hitting the streets of Kabul, or Teheran, or wherever we hit next. That should create much more employment for war-torn economies than any US aid funds

      --
      Quokka bites are not a medical emergency!
    12. Re:Great idea by jcaplan · · Score: 1

      Its disposable because the device is so cheap that when one breaks then you just use your buddy's device. If its mil-spec you might end up with no backup device or no device at all. When my nephew was in Iraq they had problems getting enough mil-spec radios for their Guard trucks - they had been ripped out and given to other units that had shipped out earlier.

    13. Re:Great idea by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I was being a tad sarcastic - but you don't even need to re engineer the thing. Just put it in a nice holster / protector and you are most of the way there. And like I said, they can be pretty much disposable.

      If this works out, then somebody can build a mil spec iPod from scratch, but as a demonstration of concept, I don't see anything wrong with it. 10 million teenagers can't be too far wrong...

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    14. Re:Great idea by guruevi · · Score: 1

      All they need is a decent cover for these things and it will work just fine. Solid state electronics these days are already near indestructible except for the LCD. Protect that and you're fine, they have leather holders with a hard flap that work great for under $15

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    15. Re:Great idea by LiNKz · · Score: 1

      Just a nudge at your GPS stuff..

      Civilian GPS devices are generally not as hardened as milspec devices and should not be used in the AOR (both in the physical and electrical/jamming sense).. I seriously believe that these pieces of technology should be considered a secondary tool that provides ease in their jobs.. but a compass and a map should too be a requirement.. regardless of milspec'd hardware.

      --
      Proceed with Format (Y/N)? Y
    16. Re:Great idea by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This. We brought over more personal electronics gear than most people who haven't seen would believe. AND there's PXs on most of the bigger posts that will sell you more. AND Amazon.com ships to APOs (yes we could get to Amazon.com, don't be silly). We brought back more personal electronics gear than we brought over by probably at least an order of magnitude :-). The vast majority of it survived just fine. One guy blew out his X-Box plugging it into the wrong power, and digital camera screens got kinda scratched up from the dust, but in general, consumer spec gear did just fine (iPhones and iPod Touches having glass screens would be a big advantage there. Much harder to scratch).

      Now computers... those didn't survive as well. Personal game systems tended to stay in peoples relatively well sealed quarters, so they were mostly fine, but the grit really got into to anything that got taken outside much. Moving parts like hard drives, fans, and CD-ROMs failed a lot on our non-ruggedized laptops. The iPhone/Pods are fairly well sealed, all solid state, and like I said, have glass screens. Get a little plug to put into the ear phone holes and I think they'd have quite a reasonable failure rate.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    17. Re:Great idea by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I personally love the idea of using something like this to control ... my wife

      That's my kind of attitude!!!!!!!!!

      I'm just not soldiers are the best target audience for such efforts.

      But that's pretty condescending.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    18. Re:Great idea by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1, Funny

      While Apple gadgets may lend themselves to stealth applications (being that you can, as a rule, only see their users' silhouettes), the gleaming white outline of the iPod may prove to inadvertently reveal the troop position.

    19. Re:Great idea by Nutria · · Score: 1

      I doubt they use extended temperature

      It doesn't get that cold in Iraq. Maybe too hot.

      components or water tight seals everywhere like a milspec unit would.

      And it doesn't rain that much in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Would tiny rubber gaskets against sand be difficult to retrofit?

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    20. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the average joe shmoe probably treats his electronics a bit better than your average grunt.

      Newsflash. The average grunt IS the average joe schmoe. Like - my dorky son for instance? Actually, you have things a little backwards. The average grunt has to answer for any part of his field kit that may come up missing, and usually pay for it if he doesn't have a good excuse. Joe schmoe, on the other hand, don't give a damn, 'cause he can get Mother or Grandma to buy him a new iPhone, iPod, or whatever.

      "consumer grade" products. Hmmmm. We won't even get into defining what that means, or how it might relate to the military. But, your disparaging remarks reflect ignorance of real life in the field.

    21. Re:Great idea by Nutria · · Score: 2, Informative

      the gleaming white outline of the iPod may prove to inadvertently reveal the troop position.

      TFA says the iPods are "sheathed in protective casing(s)" which are presumably tan.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    22. Re:Great idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      The touch has operating specs of 32-95F, Afghanistan gets MUCH colder than that and Iraq gets MUCH hotter than that. Put it in a water and sand proof sleeve and the high end of that range probably drops. Also the touch has a ceiling of 10K feet, there are tons of places higher than that in Afghanistan (though I'm not sure what other than the accelerometer might be affected by altitude).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    23. Re:Great idea by mcatrage · · Score: 1

      If they are talking about snipers you aren't talking about normal grunts and most likely these are also being rolled out for the spec op units for things such as the ability to display a real time UAV feed. So yeah these guys know what they are doing and I'd trust them in a war zone with a piece of electronics over the average person walking down the street.

    24. Re:Great idea by afidel · · Score: 1

      I'm going from talking to my friends who work in tech and maintenance in both fields. Cold and sand are both pretty rough on even stuff that's designed for milspec (extended range) operation. There's a reason that milspec exists, see the M16A1 for a perfect example of how not properly designing a system for field use can cause serious loss of life.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    25. Re:Great idea by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Once again Apple demonstrates long-term thinking, as we now see the ultimate design goal for Apple designing iPods without replaceable batteries.

      Not to slim it down, not to increase battery density, not to drive aftermarket power products... but to keep sand from lodging between battery and casing in desert combat situations, and reap the motherlode as Uncle Sam buys them by the bucket!

      (Microsoft's contribution to the war effort? A brown Zune. And even then they couldn't get it right... hint to Redmond, sand is a much lighter colour!)

    26. Re:Great idea by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Informative

      One of my friends bought his fancy $2000 digital SLR

      Canon's xD, and to a lesser extent xxD, and L lenses are weather/dust/water-sealed as a selling point. Their xxxD (Rebel blah) and consumer and mid ranges lenses, not so. Not sure how this specifically proves your point.

    27. Re:Great idea by Nutria · · Score: 1

      32-95F

      That doesn't seem realistic, since otherwise no one could use one in 90% of the US in July and August, and more than that in the South and West, or the North and Midwest in December through February.

      Afghanistan gets MUCH colder than that and Iraq gets MUCH hotter than that

      Yup...

      But empirical data seems to prove wrong your whole thesis (unless TFA is completely bogus or shot through with inaccuracies or journalistic stupidity, which can never be discounted).

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    28. Re:Great idea by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Those are the correct specs, check Apple's web site. I've not had any problems getting my iPhone to work at > 100F but I've never tested the lower end. That range is probably based on a distribution where X% (90-95%) of the phone features would still work 100% of the time. Unless they are testing all iPhones and iPods then picking up the ones that are still working on the outlying edges of the envelopes and sending those to the military the phone is being used where it should not be. The non-operating temps go to -4F to 113F which are still out of the range of Iraq (hot end) and Afghanistan (cold end). So unless there is some way to keep it cooler (an external fan?) or warmer (that one is easier..keep it next to your body or in some insulated sleeve) I don't think it's a front line device. As someone said making a MIL-SPEC version that takes the "shake and bake" requirements into account would be very expensive and it would be as bulky as a brick.

    29. Re:Great idea by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      But, think of the demoralizing effect on the enemy! They have all heard stories of invincible American rambos, equipped to teeth with the latest and greatest of top-secret military high-tech, and are conditioned to meet that on the battlefield. But an American nerd in camouflage, sniping warriors of Allah from 5 miles away while yawning in the process with the aid of a mass-produced consumer product, a true pinnacle of the "degenerate Western society of insatiable consumption" and the embodiment of all that it represents... truly, it will instill terror and desperation in your foes such that was never seen before!

    30. Re:Great idea by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      How disposable is the device if you are in the field relying on it to bring back realtime intelligence from a drone?

      Have a spare? Besides, we're talking about a country's army forces whose troopers had to buy their own extra body armor.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    31. Re:Great idea by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      The capacitative screen seems to be a shortcoming. There's nothing like a battlefield that can't be used while wearing gloves.

    32. Re:Great idea by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Afghanistan (cold end)

      You'd keep it under your parka, even next to your skin. Anyway, it would be physically impossible(?) to operate with heavy gloves or mittens.

      As someone said making a MIL-SPEC version that takes the "shake and bake" requirements into account would be very expensive and it would be as bulky as a brick.

      That's true. Just being strongly dust resistant would be Good Enough.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    33. Re:Great idea by shermo · · Score: 2, Funny

      10 million teenagers can't be too far wrong...

      Wait, so you're saying the Jonas Brothers are the best band ever?

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    34. Re:Great idea by mixmatch · · Score: 1

      I'm in the army. I loathe anything that is 'milspec'. Milspec means that they take something like, say, a $5 cable that is available on the commercial market as a standard, make the rubber thicker and replace the easy-to-use connector with some crazy screw-on piece of crap. The cable is now ridiculously expensive and if it goes bad, requires that the entire unit be turned in for repairs. There is commercially available equipment for nearly every task out there, with the occasional exception to equipment designed to kill, etc, and its often cheap, reliable, and easy to replace. For the cost of one 'milspec' iPod device, you could likely buy a dozen iPods and save yourself the headache of a costly government contract.

    35. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah they canceled that in 2007 after completely screwing up the process from design to implementation (land warrior).

      Maybe it has to do with the fact that the government wastes millions of dollars on research and development for 'milspec' devices that are a poor alternative to commercially available options.

    36. Re:Great idea by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      or, they could just wrap their unit in a rubber. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condom#Other_uses

      moisture problem solved!

      and for everything else, there is apple care.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    37. Re:Great idea by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      First, milspec is more a standardized testing methodology to rate tolerances and not really a set of standards to be met.

      As it's been mentioned, consumer electronics are commonplace downrange these days. Although back in my day, I had to confiscate Gameboys because issue batteries for our NVDs almost inevitably ended up in everything else.

      iPhones are a lot tougher than a lot of people might think. I've carried my first gen iPhone in even more extreme environmental conditions than Iraq and Afghanistan with no real problems.

      The only time that I had trouble was a winter in Tajikistan when I left it out in the vehicle. The screen colors were all warped when it eventually started but it got better on its own.

      Heat and dust, no biggie. Just don't leave it lying in the sun, which is good practice for anything.

      The only time my iPhone goes in a case is when there's a risk I might take an unplanned trip into the water, for which I have an Otterbox.

    38. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    39. Re:Great idea by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      I think the average joe shmoe probably treats his electronics a bit better than your average grunt.

      You don't have teen-aged children, do you?

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    40. Re:Great idea by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's as disposable as the drone. And if one drone getting shot down hoses your plans, your plans weren't very good.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    41. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As you know, you go to war with the Army you have. They're not the Army you might want or wish to have at a later time."

      So you're telling me that we're not equiping our marines in the latest power armor and bolters? Rumsfeld is such a douchebag!

    42. Re:Great idea by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      On my three deployments to Iraq, I brought a first-gen iPod Shuffle, a first-gen iPod Nano, and an iPhone 3G (in that order). fwiw, I've also brought my iBook or Macbook Pro, depending on which one I had at the time.

      Each time, the device lived in my left trouser cargo pocket (hard to get to the device if it's under your body armor). These deployments covered all seasons and thus saw mud, rain, intense heat, dust storms, etc. Not to mention being banged around quite a bit. I've also brought each of these devices to hawaii, iceland, and europe. The chargers are dual-voltage, which means I can plug in anywhere.

      And look- soldiers carry around night vision goggles, pictures of their families, ipods, consumer gps units, oakley sunglasses, and a host of other fragile items. We're not barbarians. And on top of that, an off-the-shelf iPod Touch is literally an order of magnitude cheaper than an equivalent device designed purely for the military.

      This is perfect because this time, while taxpayers are technically subsidizing a military product by funding Apple's R&D, they get an ipod out of the deal.

      Oh and to some posts decrying Apple as being evil for providing products that the military uses: You might want to take stock of your own possessions- I'v heard that some soldiers use linux! And some of them write orders with BIC PENS! Toss your pens!

      Some soldiers use Zens and Sansas, too (they work sometimes for a whole WEEK in the battlefield), so toss your Zens. We use post-its every day- toss out your damn post-its.

      OK sorry for the rant.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    43. Re:Great idea by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol...

      [shot of bin laden sitting in dark cave, lit by monitor glow. Windows moviemaker is visible over his shoulder]

      "I'm going to make a little video here that I made with my camera [quick pan to sony handicam with CIA property barcode]. Here we go."

      "I like windows vista because it makes this job so easy. I just drag this file into the player window, see, and then I cut out the boring parts like this... and done. Now I just add a music track from windows media player, like this jonas brothers song here. I love them! OK so now I just export to disc, select dvd, ok, and we're off!"

      [Jump shot to CNN-looking fake news broadcast] "A new propoganda video has led the intelligence community to believe that Bin Laden has a professional hollywood production team working with him in the mountains of pakistan."

      [jump to intel analyst] "I have a Mac at home, and even *I* couldn't create such a good-looking video! Look at those credits! He used the Papyrus font! That's so cool!"

      [jump to news broadcast again] [propoganda video is playing, with jonas bros soundtrack while insurgents cross monkey bars at a training camp]

      [voice over during fade to MS Vista logo] "I'm Osama bin Laden, and I'm a PC"

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    44. Re:Great idea by dwillden · · Score: 1

      I wasn't running around outside the wire, but my Mil-issued Ipod Classic 80gig (for language study purposes) survived my tour in Afghanistan just fine. More than ruggedness, I'd be worried about whether or not the soldiers will be allowed to put some music or movies on the devices for use during their down times. They should be so allowed.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    45. Re:Great idea by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My iPhone doesn't work well with a cold finger (as in gloveless in temperatures significantly below freezing), so I've had to warm up my finger now and then to use it. I haven't noticed any other problems in cold weather, and it gets a lot colder than -4F where I live. Of course, the iPhone lives in my shirt pocket, under my coat, so I don't think it ever gets all that cold, even when the temperature's below -20F. Here in Minnesota I don't get very many chances to test it above 100F.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    46. Re:Great idea by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And it's essentially a matter of physics. It isn't a matter of money. It isn't a matter on the part of the Army of desire. It's a matter of production and capability of doing it.

      Don't forget Part 3, where this turned out to be wrong when the CEO of the company who makes the armor kits said that they had ample capacity to increase production, but that the military had never asked.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    47. Re:Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, shortly after that little Q&A session happened, it came out that the plant in Ohio that armors the Hummers could handle a work-load of 300 more a month. The orders simply weren't coming.

      Not surprisingly, Rumsfeld was caught talking out of his ass again.

    48. Re:Great idea by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      The A1 fixed a lot of the issues with the original M16 - chrome bore and forward assist.

      Just look at the whole M16 period and compare it with the FN-FAL for an example of what not to do if you want to create a battle rifle...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    49. Re:Great idea by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Hanson are better! or they used to be, I don't remember, it was a long time ago...

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  6. How well do they take being dropped / shot at? How by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    How well do they take being dropped / shot at? How about systems with Itunes?

  7. Microsoft Issuing WinMobile Devices To Soldiers by CyberSlammer · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the Ballmer testing division they make excellent projectiles, they have a 99.9% chance of putting an eye out.

    1. Re:Microsoft Issuing WinMobile Devices To Soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the new ad, Kristen says "I guess I'm not cool enough to be a sniper" as she ties into her Zune while walking into the army mess tent.

    2. Re:Microsoft Issuing WinMobile Devices To Soldiers by Own3d-You · · Score: 1

      Is that like some kind of chair launching device?

  8. In other news... by Starteck81 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Senators were heard saying quote:"These iPhones have become quite useful to the military. I guess it was a good thing we bought a couple to try out even thought they can't really 'jailbreak' you if you get caught taking bribes.

    --
    "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is this modded funny?

  9. But do they support ogg? by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

    Meh..

    1. Re:But do they support ogg? by Chabo · · Score: 1

      If Rockbox adds support, then yes. :)

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  10. Re:How much from the Apple store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are in the store, just $10000 per license. Special government pricing.

  11. tactical warning notice required? by j-stroy · · Score: 1

    Retreating fanboys may be butt-hurt.

  12. RAINING BLOOD by bridgeco · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we can expect a little Slayer in the next iPod commercial?

    --
    Groucho not Karl.
  13. Other Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See? Another application of Steve Jobs Reality distortion field in action.
    Especially against Armies of Developed Nation.
    Want an IPOD? Surrender first !

  14. Ever wanted to by Overkill+Nbuta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ever wanted to blow up the **** out of terrorists?

    There is an app for that.

    1. Re:Ever wanted to by purpleraison · · Score: 1

      Ever wanted to blow up the **** out of terrorists?

      There is an app for that.

      Friggin hilarious! Thank you.

      --
      I am open source, and Linux baby!
    2. Re:Ever wanted to by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Of all the times to not have mod points... LOL

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  15. Hmmm by BoneFlower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like the idea. Smartphones have enough computing power and sufficient battery life to perform militarily useful functions, with a minimum of added weight to the soldiers gear.

    I'm not sure about the platform choice though. One company controls the hardware and software. There are no alternatives in either category that allow you to benefit from prior investments- replacing the hardware or OS requires junking everything you already have. And if the public APIs don't let you do what you need, and Apple can't or won't, it won't do what you need and thats that.

    Android, or even Windows Mobile, I think would be better. A lot easier to switch to another device and minimize training costs, a lot easier and cheaper to get a device custom designed and built for specific military applications. These two are far more open- anyone with a properly trained engineering team and some money can make devices for these platforms. You need a specialized gadget integrated? You'll have a dozen companies salivating at defense budget dollars. You'll get it done, balancing capability and cost will be a meaningful choice and you can make it based on the needs and the budget, not because it's the best of limited options.

    1. Re:Hmmm by astat · · Score: 1

      Well, even the army needs to be cool nowadays. Can't visit a school with mere Windows Mobile.

    2. Re:Hmmm by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Informative

      How exactly would a non-iPod device have lower training costs? Part of the allure of the iPod Touch is that so many soldiers already own them, and plenty more are familiar enough to use them with minimal training, and that's without even directly addressing the fact that the iPod has the simplest and most intuitive interface of the options.

      If the military decides that the iPod touch is an important platform to keep around, they can force Apple into enough of a licensing agreement that the government can hire Apple's OEM to keep making the model they want indefinitely.

    3. Re:Hmmm by pimpimpim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure about the platform choice though. One company controls the hardware and software. There are no alternatives in either category that allow you to benefit from prior investments- replacing the hardware or OS requires junking everything you already have.

      sounds like the average military/government spec to me.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    4. Re:Hmmm by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      Try operating Windows Mobile with gloves on..

      Not to mention, iPhone/iPod Touch are not that hard to develop for. Apparently the API's DO allow them to do what they need, so I'm not sure what your argument is there. The apps have been made, they're in the field already, in use. Your talking like this is a new idea and the future of it is uncertain. The future is Now.

      btw, this is coming from someone who's never owned anything from Apple and who uses a Windows Mobile PDA regularly.

    5. Re:Hmmm by makisig · · Score: 1

      Same here. Why did the military choose iPhone/iPod over any other device?

      I agree with BoneFlower that, from a consumer's perspective, there are alternative platforms that are open, interoperable and are cheaper. Personally, I couldn't afford anything from Apple - if I had wanted any of their products. But that's just me, and I don't make that much money.

      Of course, we can only speculate based on how we look at it. Perhaps there's an internal arrangement between the military, Apple, and the third-parties who were contracted to develop the apps that we know nothing about. Military budget is pretty huge so it may not be a question of military spending.

      From the article, it said that iPods are cheaper than other military-grade devices. Duh? I'm sure if they went a step further, they would find some other device that does the same job at a lower cost.

      However, having a few companies "control the hardware and software" may be useful in protecting military intel. Closing the source and the specs can make Apple products a little more challenging to crack. But still....

    6. Re:Hmmm by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      The point is, what happens when:

        - Apple discontinues that line
        - Apple makes a large API change
        - Apple decides they don't want to play ball with the Army anymore
        - Apple puts out shoddy components, and the Army wants another manufacturer...

      notice the commonality here?

      Say what you will about Windows Mobile, but at the very least, if anything goes wrong with hardware production, you can switch vendors. With Android, anything goes wrong with either hardware or software, you can switch vendors.

      Presumably the Army is going to want to keep deploying these, if they're successful, right? The ones deployed now may be great -- give them five or ten years, and the Army will either have to buy (and maintain) the iPhone line off Apple, or they'll have to start from scratch on another platform.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:Hmmm by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I have to also say "try operating an iPhone with gloves on"

      While the Windows mobile device is cumbersome (even without gloves on... you pretty much NEED a stylus) the iPhone won't even respond to gloves. I'm not sure how the touchscreen works but being that it's not pressure based it pretty much requires a living finger to work.

    8. Re:Hmmm by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I should have been clearer, I was referring to retraining costs when they need to replace the hardware, in the event that Apple no longer has a suitable product available.

      Initial training, iPhone probably has a small advantage, but these things will have to be replaced eventually. If Apple no longer makes suitable hardware, they'd have to switch platforms and incur the resultant retraining costs.

    9. Re:Hmmm by BoneFlower · · Score: 2, Informative

      iPhone uses a capacitive touchscreen. In short, this means it depends on the electrical charge of the users body to track touch.

      Styli and gloves are pretty much guaranteed to block this charge, though I suppose conductive ones could be made to work if the resistance is low enough.

      Windows Mobile devices, and at least all the palms I've seen, use different technology that is based in pressure rather than charge. Fingers work, but in my experience they just don't have the precision to work well with this sort of touchscreen, at least on a smartphone scale.

    10. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The military doesn't really have normal training costs. Most training that doesn't involve explosions is merely playing around with something till you've figured it out.

    11. Re:Hmmm by shentino · · Score: 1

      You can't just weasel out of a written contract, even if you're an integrated software/hardware vendor.

      Particularly if the other side is a government agency as beefy as the DoD.

    12. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what happens:

      Apple is paid huge dollars to keep it going, provide whatever they need.

      The perfect capitalistic, monopolistic, storm.

    13. Re:Hmmm by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      It's frackin' easy with a stylus. Try using a capacitive touch screen with gloves on.

      Guess which OS most ruggedized PDAs actually run? You got it - Windows Mobile.

    14. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone here tried to use an iPod touch (or iPhone) while wearing gloves?

      Yeah, that doesn't work at all.

    15. Re:Hmmm by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      Gloves: http://www.tavoproducts.com/

      Stylus: http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/cellphone/a31f/

      Yeah, getting custom gloves and styli are not ideal, but that's the tradeoff for the glass screen. A pressure-based touchscreen like the DS is far more susceptible to scratching.

    16. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Windows Mobile, Symbian and others are available to the military right now, and they have developed custom solutions... and you know what, they're expensive and they suck.

      Sure, the Apple solution comes from one company, but it just works, and it's drop dead easy to develop for, and it's inexpensive. So what's the problem?

    17. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great reasons about openness. But not chosen for the same reasons. Apple already developed the utilities the military needed in the UI, SW distribution, reliability, fast development and even security. You can take any other platform and do the same thing with more engineering and testing. In the meantime, you'd have nothing in the field.

    18. Re:Hmmm by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      And if/when Apple ever falls through, despite those huge dollars?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    19. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUD

  16. asdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what happens when they get stolen from the enemy...they will be using our iphones against us...lol...real smart idea

  17. Toggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the Toggle character from recent Doonesbury strips. U.S. Soldier in Iraq, he drove a jeep into a roadside bomb after missing warnings because he was using an iPod while driving. Now suffering TBI with chunks of iPod apparently still embedded in his head.

    1. Re:Toggle by 644bd346996 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was more reminded of this Doonesbury.

  18. Re:How well do they take being dropped / shot at? by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could shoot 'at' an iPod all day long and not damage it. It's when I accidentally hit the target that there may be problems.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  19. Tradeoffs, tradeoffs... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While, as you say, these are probably being used somewhat past their rated specs, I'm not sure that that is a critical problem. Touches are solid state and reasonably well sealed by default, and I'm sure that shoving them in a Pelican case isn't exactly rocket surgery. I suspect that, in practice, they survive pretty well.

    Beyond that, though, there is some truth to the old cliche "the perfect is the enemy of the good". Which are you better off with, the Touch running off-the-shelf software for under $250 a unit now, or the hardened mil-spec widget wending its way through the contractor process that will cost 4 times as much and be available in small quantities in 8 months?

    I'd be very disappointed to hear that soldiers had grown critically dependent on the things, and wandered around lost whenever they didn't have them; but, assuming that is avoided, what is the issue? If a device improves your performance, and is available 90% of the time, you are better off on average. If these devices turn out to only last an average of 6 months, then we'll need to treat them as a consumable, hardly a novel procedure. Anybody who operates on the assumption that consumer gear will survive as well in Tora Bora as it does in Starbucks is a moron; but that isn't the only assumption you can operate on.

    1. Re:Tradeoffs, tradeoffs... by afidel · · Score: 2

      The problem is the HAVE the ruggedized,secure general purpose computer system, they just chose not to fund it. It's called Land Warrior and it runs Linux on XScale so should be simple to design for. Building Glabal Hawks for $125M and then skimping on a couple thousand per field user is just the kind of crap the military loves to do to the soldier in the field.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Tradeoffs, tradeoffs... by Blastercorps · · Score: 1

      Yes LandWarrior is a nice ruggedized soldier computing unit. It also costs thousands, weighs 40 pounds, and is harder to use than an itouch. Probably does less too.

  20. Not nitpicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The right spelling is Gandhi.
    Gan as in "gone" + dhi as in the first portion of 'this'.

    1. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The right spelling is Gandhi.

      Correct. I am a retard.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:Not nitpicking by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I'm so tempted to post "I am a ghoti" a thousand times, but perhaps I shouldn't.

      Not sure why we need spelling lessons here.

    3. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You proved that many times over in your posts here throughout the years. But at least you're not in denial.

      You know, at least I have the balls to log in & admit I've made a stupid mistake.

      You? Anonymously snipe & never admit your stupidity.

      You are in denial.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    4. Re:Not nitpicking by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      You know, at least I have the balls to log in & admit I've made a stupid mistake.

      Now you only have to admit to a couple of hundred others. No, wait - lies aren't mistakes, are they?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    5. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You forget to tick the "Post Anonymously" checkbox.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    6. Re:Not nitpicking by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      You forget to tick the "Post Anonymously" checkbox.

      Don't project your behavior on me.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I bother to post anonymously? This account is effectively anonymous.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    8. Re:Not nitpicking by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck would I bother to post anonymously? This account is effectively anonymous.

      But you assume I would? Projection.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    9. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      This account is effectively anonymous.

      But you assume I would? Projection.

      No assumptions of any sort made. You are in denial.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    10. Re:Not nitpicking by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      This account is effectively anonymous.

      But you assume I would? Projection.

      No assumptions of any sort made. You are in denial.

      "You forget to tick the "Post Anonymously" checkbox." Projection and denial.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    11. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You are in denial.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    12. Re:Not nitpicking by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Sure, whatever you say - because you are obviously the expert on being in denial.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    13. Re:Not nitpicking by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      You're like an Egyptian going for a swim.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
  21. aren't those thing built in China? by atarione · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what could possibly go wrong?

    there have been stories about the Chinese sneaking counterfeit chips into military application some of which have made there way into military aircraft.

    using a consumer gadget built in china seems like a truly epically bad idea.

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    1. Re:aren't those thing built in China? by athlon02 · · Score: 1

      I understand the concern, but I'm not that worried about it... they are not using them in missiles, aircraft, ships, etc. They are using them as supplements for calculations, video players, and remote controls for small robots. While there could be problems, they are likely to be on the smaller scale. And knowing how strict the military is on specs, I imagine they tested at least a few before mass distribution.

    2. Re:aren't those thing built in China? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The military would never amount to more than a fraction of a percent of the iPod touch sales, so anybody attempting espionage or sabotage would have to subvert a huge number of iPods in order to have an effect on the military that is distinguishable from the regular failure rate, and the problem would probably be noticed by the general public long before the military was significantly affected.

    3. Re:aren't those thing built in China? by db32 · · Score: 1

      You have no idea how many people it takes to run all of the abacuses that the military uses. It is pretty difficult to get any kind of equipment for calculations that wasn't made in China, but at least an abacus is easier to check for problems.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    4. Re:aren't those thing built in China? by kuzb · · Score: 1

      Good ol' security by obscurity. I expect nothing less from the US military.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
    5. Re:aren't those thing built in China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Apple's products are OEM/ODM in hardware-heavy countries like Taiwan and India. Of course, they too have contractors located in China, to make components, but most likely not the entire product.

      You may find more detail on books such as World is Flat...etc.

  22. Ummmm.... by copponex · · Score: 1

    Besides keeping their investment intact, do you think the Pentagon gives a good goddamn about their soldier's lives? Look at how they treat them once they've been chewed up by years of service.

    I guarantee they did an analysis that compared the cost of creating a milspec device with the same capabilities and how much money they would lose if x number of soldiers died due to malfunction. The only thing that could have changed their minds is a powerful politician and a well paid lobbyist with some contracting firm.

  23. Designed in California, Made in China by fitash · · Score: 0

    And Used in Irak

  24. who cares if it's not milspec by bigtrike · · Score: 1

    Milspec can make anything absurdly expensive to produce. This is important when you're building nuclear weapons where failures are very expensive.

    It's not so expensive when the cost of one breaking is to simply replace it with another practically free device. Surely the rugged cases they are in will protect them from water and shock.

  25. Re:How well do they take being dropped / shot at? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I dunno, you should ask this guy!

  26. Some of us absolutely LOVE bush. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bush hating

    Hey! Some of us absolutely LOVE bush.

    Stop the Apple users are gay innuendo!

  27. It's about time by indytx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Much of the clothing, camping, and cold weather gear available at a local REI performs better than what is issued to U.S. soldiers. The military has been slow to adopt consumer products which may work better than what is currently being supplied. This is gradually changing, and it's a change for the better. You don't always need everything to be radiation hardened. Sometimes the best product for a given job is available now, and you don't want to wait for it to be tested ad nauseum, debated, defended, and advocated through the convoluted military procurement process. An iPod Touch is relatively cheap, cheap enough that it's almost disposable. On the other hand, it's too bad there's not an option for AA batteries. Recharging is tough in the field.

    --
    Make love, not reality television.
    1. Re:It's about time by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Recharging is tough in the field. What?!? Don't Humvees have cigarette lighter sockets? Next you'll be telling me the military version doesn't even have cupholders!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:It's about time by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      As an added plus, the soldiers can kill downtime with Hannah Montana sing-offs. Just attach external speakers and throw down!

    3. Re:It's about time by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if it's built anything like the new Ford Fiesta it doesn't come with cupholders. It comes with grenade holders.

      Top Gear road testing the Ford Fiesta ("What if I'm asked to take part in a beach assault with the Royal Marines?")

    4. Re:It's about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost disposable? An iPod touch is a couple of hundred dollars, which for the military, IS disposable. I've worked on some pretty cool UAVs for non-military applications, but there was significant military funding as they were deemed potentially useful for situations in which disposable UAVs could be deployed in battlefield situations. Unit cost: couple of thousand. Moral: never underestimate what an entity worth half a trillion a year considers disposable.

  28. Why are they just doing this now? by d_jedi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    PDAs/Smartphones which have the desired functionality have existed for many years before the iPhone/iPod touch.
    And using C# with the .NET compact framework is much nicer than developing for the iPhone (background processes, yeah!)

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:Why are they just doing this now? by DustyShadow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually Special Forces have had access to PDAs for a few years now that can access to Global Hawk imagery real time. They can pinpoint an area on a map to cue the plane to scan or to send down historical imagery. The only real new thing here is that they are using Apple devices.

    2. Re:Why are they just doing this now? by DustyShadow · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:Why are they just doing this now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And using C# with the .NET compact framework is much nicer than developing for the iPhone

      No, it's not. The iPhone OS is a nice, easy platform to develop for. If you're stuck in windows thinking, maybe it's frustrating to you because you're made to use MVC, or cause it doesn't work the way windows does. But that's your mental limitations, not a problem with the platform.

      Having done both, I'd go with the iPhone.

    4. Re:Why are they just doing this now? by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amusingly the argument is usually the other way round - Iphone user asserts that even though it might not have any extra features, it's better because it's "much nicer".

      The point is that everyone's preference varies, and it's subjective - this argument isn't valid either way, and no phones or PDAs are actually better by this measure.

    5. Re:Why are they just doing this now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been going on for a while. I've wrote mortar control software, which was fielded, for PDAs around 5 years ago for palm pilots.

  29. American by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad it's an American company. I just wish the product were made in the USA.

  30. Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 5, Informative

    You may remember that, in the earlier days of the Iraq war, soldiers would write home begging for their families to send them Talkabout FRS radios. Yup, those little handheld radios sold in blister packs at Wal-Mart for camping trips.

    Those things are, doubtless, less secure, less durable, less resistant to interference, and less powerful than purpose-built military communications systems would be. However, they had one big advantage: they were available to the soldiers when they needed them.

    If the military has trouble getting a mature technology like handheld radios into the hands the troops, you can bet that they'd flub something like handheld computers even worse. Sometimes, it's better to just buy the darned things at Wal-Mart.

    1. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Loved those things. We used them through most of our deployment. You couldn't say everything, but we used code for some stuff or just told people to get to a phone or encrypted radio so you could talk in the clear. The range was short, but usually enough for talking around the camp or for a gate detail or patrol to communicate. It wasn't actually that we had a shortage of milspec radios, it was more that the damned things weigh 25 pounds. Not something you want to be carrying in addition to your weapon, ballistic vest, ammo, helmet, water, etc. We had a small supply of police type radios that could be encrypted for clear communications, but even those are fairly heavy and we had fewer of them. The battalion commander briefly tried to ban them, but we convinced him that we knew how to avoid classified conversations over plain text, and that there were no real practical alternatives.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    2. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by afidel · · Score: 1

      Sadly true, but more than anything shouldn't that have been a wakeup call that the military needs to spend more time focusing on the soldier in the field and perhaps a bit less on $150M a shot Globalhawks or $1B+ B2's? Perhaps the focus on the soldier that Gates espouses will actually come to fruition before the end of this series of conflicts. Perhaps it's because only three secretaries of defense (Perry, Weinberger, Richardson) have seen combat from the ground level vs big ships or airplanes or map pin pushing that there's been such an emphasis on the big battle systems at the detriment of the men in the field. I think it's so despicable that we spend almost as much as the rest of the world combined on defense but can't seem to get the tools our soldiers need in their hands.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those things are, doubtless, less secure, less durable, less resistant to interference, and less powerful than purpose-built military communications systems would be. However, they had one big advantage: they were available to the soldiers when they needed them.

      That's actually really scary.

      They're not only "less" secure, they're not secure at all. They're just FM radios that transmit a sub-audible tone to help you filter out other people's conversations. It's not a security feature any more than closing your eyes keeps people from seeing you.

    4. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by Viktor+Karlsson · · Score: 1

      My experience is that the understanding on what would be classified conversations are extremely low. I've worked at a multi-national army camp a couple of years ago with comms and listening to that chatter just made me sad.

      The whole point of using encrypted radios for e.g. movement plans are useless when people ask "Charlie-Foxtrot Niner-Niner, Do you want us to pick up some Mountain Dew for you?".Add other pieces of information and a listener end up with the knowledge of who is going where and when.

      "Classified Conversations" are a clear giveaway but "casual chatter" among soldiers gives a listener with some knowledge a pretty good picture as well. As for short ranges I think that most camps nowadays has local employees doing all sorts of stuff so for camp snooping as well as on the field range is not really that big problem.

      I've never met you but from my experience I'd guess that your "code for some stuff" really wasn't half as secretive as you thought. By "just told people to get a phone or encrypted radio" you point out that something has happened or something needs to be communicated in a classified way to a specific person/position.

    5. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the enemy knows where the Mountain Dew is kept. You're assuming that the enemy cares that some random guy from my squad (as opposed to the hundred of other random soldiers and civilians that might be there) is at the PX picking up Mountain Dew. You're assuming the enemy knows that our random call signs for each other indicate whether someone important is being asked for. You're assuming that every time I ask somebody to go to phone I want to hold super secret conversations, as opposed just being tired of the mediocre reception and the push-to-talk button.

      While dedicated surveillance of these radios, combined with a fairly in depth knowledge of camp procedures might allow an enemy to piece together such useful facts as "SSG Rodriguez is in the Porta-potty, and SPC Smith has run to the PX", how useful is that really? They're not going to risk the cover of any operatives they've gotten into one of the most secure facilitates in the country to take out a couple of random soldiers. Especially since if they have someone capable of doing so in position, they'd probably just observe and wait for their chance.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    6. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by Viktor+Karlsson · · Score: 1

      In this case, Mountain Dew was only able to be purchased at the US Camp, so yes, a listener would know that someone would go from a known position (e.g. my camp) to another known position (e.g. US Camp). Feel free to think out an example suiting your situation better. If you use truly random call signs that's great, in my experience it was more common to re-use your particular squads regular callsign. So no, I'm not talking about an assault from the inside of a camp. Another classic is when a radio guy wants to give his pals a heads-up that some high ranking officer is about to show up in 20 minutes so they should dress up properly.

      My main point is that perhaps you are an awesome guy who do better than the average private Schmoe, but in general what you describe sucks from a security perspective.

    7. Re:Iraq and Motorola Talkabouts by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I can see your point a bit better now. Let me explain that we didn't use the "talk-abouts" outside the wire. We were on one of the larger camps in country and considered the unsecured radios sufficient for inside the wire communications about non-classified matters. To make use of the info we passed over these things you'd have had to have infiltrated probably the second or third most secure location in the country and been there long enough to setup surveillance of the radios and figure out our (fairly simple, I'll grant you) codes.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  31. Re:How well do they take being dropped / shot at? by Repton · · Score: 1

    I should think windows systems with iTunes get shot at all the time in the more ornery parts of the country..

    --
    Repton.
    They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
  32. Gloves? by speedingant · · Score: 1

    Just thinking, don't soldiers wear full gloves everywhere? Last time I heard, you can't use the iPod touch with gloves, you have to use your bare hands.

  33. Apple used to hate the military by binaryspiral · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Back in the day when the Steves ran Apple there was a very strong understanding the Apple won't sell anything to the military for any reason, especially for warfare. Of course the military wasn't ever directly sold Apple products, but they aquired them through third party purchasers and ended up being in the missile silos anyway.

    I would imagine this business decree was tossed out with Jobs to help bolster sales any way they could.

    That, my friends, is where my fanboy history ends - I bought a PC and ran linux. The rest I read in the flame wars here.

    1. Re:Apple used to hate the military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That, my friends, is where my fanboy history ends - I bought a PC and ran linux. The rest I read in the flame wars here."
      The military uses Linux all over the place (mainly red hat, but other flavors as well), and developers at DOD and the major defense contractors have made contributions that have filtered back into the open source community.

      -- SE at a hated evil defense contractor, not good enough to make such contributions, but know personally those that have...

    2. Re:Apple used to hate the military by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      I'm a soldier and one of my computers runs Ubuntu. And I brought a livecd with me to iraq.

      The military uses products from every electronics manufacturer out there. They don't advertise to us specifically, we just buy what we need.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  34. despite the typical nay-saying by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

    that i've heard so far ("how many lives put at risk from consumer goods", "o, woe is me it's not linux"), i think this is very cool.

    i see this more a test of whether or not a small, (maybe) cheap, easy to use, versatile electronic device can and will be welcomed by the military.

    given that most people under the age of thirty (if not older) are very comfortable with electronics, i see this working out very well. just wait, the fancy PDAs and other personal electronic devices from your favorite FPS are coming soon.

    --
    not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
  35. I've Seen This Movie Before..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 3, Funny

    DEVICE SELECT: DRONE='predator1'

    DRONESTATUS=predator1: >IN RANGEONLINEINVENTORY>WEAPONS>AVAIL

    WEAPONSAVAIL>MISSILE=0,1,2,3

    SELECT MISSILE=3

    MISSILE=3> TARGET=2

    MISSILE3/TARGET2: 'fire'

    ERROR: This device is protected by DRM. Please contact your dealer or reseller, call Apple directly at 1-800-APL-CARE, or you can visit our knowledge base on the World Wide Web at www.apple.com/support/ipodtouch/.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  36. So which were... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...the best laptops you saw that survived and functioned well in a harsh environment?

    1. Re:So which were... by NoisySplatter · · Score: 1

      That's really more of a function of the owner and where they use it.

      I took my laptop to Iraq. While I was there I had to replace the dvd drive twice. I assume because of dust issues, but I never bothered to find out that conclusively. The last one I installed was a slot loader and I'd recommend that.

      I didn't have much of a problem with the fans, but I'd recommend something without fans on the bottom. Dust tends to settle on tables and the fans just suck it up.

      The power brick broke once while I was there and once shortly after I got back. It was running on generator power and the generator had a lot of problems, so if I had to give a cause it would be dirty power and extreme temperature cycling. The room temperature varied between 120F and 60F throughout the day.

      For what it's worth I was using an emachines M6809. Nobody I know actually lost a laptop to anything other than a broken screen.

      --
      In Soviet Russia meme tires of you!
    2. Re:So which were... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      For the real "In the field" applications, I feel comfortable recommending Panasonic's "Toughtbook" line. We had very few problems with them relative to anything else. If you're just looking for something to take over there to play with in your room, get the cheapest thing you can and don't be to concerned if it dies before you get back. Couple of guys I knew bought expensive laptops (one guy had an Alienware), while only a few died in country (and usually from replaceable stuff, like HDDs), I hate to think they spent that kind of money then took years off the life of the machine (which they probably did).

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  37. Gandhi, not Ghandi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is Gandhi...not Ghandi.

    More than being a spelling nazi, I guess educated individuals - especially Americans - should know the spelling of Jesus Christ, Mohandas Gandhi, Mother Theresa, Abraham Lincoln etc.

  38. Whip out the old PDA by Kamineko · · Score: 1

    How very Stargatey. In SG1, Carter wields a Tapwave Zodiac in some scenes. In SGA, they have their own custom Atlantis-made doodad (that looks like an everyday Win-mob PDA with some plastic stuck on it) that does everything.

  39. Seriously, Tilt Control? by mastershake82 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, tilt control for bomb disposal robots? I hope that is a joke or an assumption and not actually true.

    I've never personally owned an iPhone, but I work IT on a college campus therefore have the device shoved in my face literally multiple times a week by students and faculty wanting to show me the new game they just got from the App store. And from what I can tell, the accelerometers are barely accurate enough for simple games, much less expensive military robots.

    Even a Wii Remote, which one might consider the "top of the line" in consumer grade accelerometer technology, isn't ideal. If your going to control something remotely, changes are you are going to want something that has a spring or some sort of mechanism to return it to neutral when no pressure is applied. Having to guess how the accelerometer is calibrated and hold the device neutral is far less than ideal.

    1. Re:Seriously, Tilt Control? by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's symptomatic of less-than-industrial-standard coding.
      'Titlting' is a fairly open word - they might use tilting to change the directional vector by X degrees per tilt - or to simply swivel the camera intuitively.

      In any case, you might find the following video interesting: a forumula 1 car, driven remotely by accelerometers in a BlackBerry Storm and bluetooth.
      http://www.blackberrynews.com/2009/03/10/storm-controlled-formula-one-car-a-hit-with-lewis-hamilton/

      Given just how hard it is to drive these things, it might very well be on par with the difficulty of driving a bomb disposal robot - no doubt someone more informed can fill me in.

  40. Land Warrior by Bensam123 · · Score: 1

    Anyone find this odd that the Land Warrior program has pretty much been ditched and ran into all sorts of problems, yet they can do a lot of what they wanted to do on a iPod?

    I always thought it was odd that it took such a extremely long time to develop something in house that seems to be commercially available already.

  41. My apologies to Ma Bell... by rts008 · · Score: 1

    iTouch+interface with Predator/Avenger UAV's control brings whole new meaning to 'reach out and touch someone'!

    I hope the US Military is running their own 'Appstore' for this!

    "Congrat.'s, Commander! For winning the last field exercise, Code name: 'Operation E-bay Amphibious Assault', your Unit/Command has been with credited 10(ten) Credits, which can be used on MilAppStore.gov.mil."

    Some of you will take this as sarcasm, or sarcastic hubris. It is meant as neither one.

    This would be a cool, efficient, and useful tool for those having to make their decisions while sitting in the hot seat, and I back this 100% from that context/perspective![been there, done that, have the 'salad' for my Mess Dress, and wore out the t-shirt)

    I'm green with envy.(pun not intended-I'm 'out to pasture now') Thiss could be a very cool thing for field commanders if used/implemented right.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  42. Aren't these things made in china? by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple has an enterprise program. You buy the $299 dev licence, and you can install to your own company/platoon/whatever's devices.

    That's interesting. Does it also allow you to lock it down so that only sanctioned apps can go on it, or so that only fully approved updates can be installed? They're the kind of features I'd be looking for if I had to approve the phone or touch for military applications.

    Well that sort of depends on what backdoors the chinese firmware creators left in.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:Aren't these things made in china? by iMac+Were · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well that sort of depends on what backdoors the chinese firmware creators left in

      I don't discrimainate, I like any firmware in my backdoor.

      --
      You thought my name meant what? How very dare you!
  43. Right there is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using proprietary solutions. Soldiers don't need gimicks they need real solutions. C# and Sharepoint are toys microsoft came up with to blow more money. Apple only solved the problem of picking up the rest of the cash Microsoft couldn't.

    I promise you if you'd slap slackware on a couple of old ipaq's, dell's, etc our military would be the most technologically advanced in the world.

    God man! We handicap soldiers forcing them to worry about product keys, licenses, and drivers. 150$ for the software to encrypt your laptop sir!

    Debian ships out of the box with encryption suppport! YOu could be a total dochebag and still install the freaking thing. What would Alquacka know about linux? You'd confuse the fuking enemy with a new operating system. They can't even load a virus on it.

    But oh no, lets spend millions on XP, 2003, and Shitpoint to just be spending money.

  44. Etiquette? by drizek · · Score: 1

    I don't know much of anything about Sudan, but I bet that playing with your phone while talking to someone is not going to be considered proper etiquette.

    1. Re:Etiquette? by ushere · · Score: 1

      nor killing them i suppose?

  45. Re:AC? That's cool, actually more than cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus man, calm down. There's much better comments to spit at than this one. The guy was making a completely innocent joke that had nothing to do with disrespecting the military.

  46. Re:AC? That's cool, actually more than cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 FunnyPostTraumaticStressDisorder FTW!

  47. Parent has a point.... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although I have nothing wrong in general with items made in another country, I woudl think that military items should be created in the country within which it is issued. Take for example, the recent thing about spys infiltrating the national Grid.

    --
    Have a nice day!
    1. Re:Parent has a point.... by mh1997 · · Score: 1

      Although I have nothing wrong in general with items made in another country, I woudl think that military items should be created in the country within which it is issued. Take for example, the recent thing about spys infiltrating the national Grid.

      I think this from the Wall Street Journal proves your point.

      Tuesday, April 21, 2009

      WASHINGTON -- Computer spies have broken into the Pentagon's $300 billion Joint Strike Fighter project -- the Defense Department's costliest weapons program ever -- according to current and former government officials familiar with the attacks.

      Similar incidents have also breached the Air Force's air-traffic-control system in recent months, these people say. In the case of the fighter-jet program, the intruders were able to copy and siphon off several terabytes of data related to design and electronics systems, officials say, potentially making it easier to defend against the craft.

    2. Re:Parent has a point.... by korbin_dallas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well now, there you go again using your brain.

      The superest, smartyest people in the whole USA work on this stuff.
      You know like Geithner.
      Yet they have no clue that all the parts come from China.
      And most parts are not stocked, and qtys over 100-500 are 60-90 day lead times.

      We wouldn't know how to fab a microchip here if our lives depended on it.

      --
      They Live, We Sleep
    3. Re:Parent has a point.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I suppose ensuring that US military uses only US made equipment may decrease their fighting ability unless you consider 'designed & engineered in US' as good enough approximation of 'made in USA'?

      I think before you start digging into who designed and made what and whether that is important for national security one should think about what constitutes a superior military power. Not only ability to produce better (usually more expensive) equipment but also ways of using it and ideology driving and motivating your people, the size of force and ability to sustain war effort for long enough time.

      If comparing to your opponents your resources are not good enough than you do not start the war. From this perspective it is not really that relevant where your military toys were made if you have enough of them and if they work.
      Georgian president did not make any of these calculations last year and see what happened with him and his country.

    4. Re:Parent has a point.... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Wrong answer...

      TI's still fabbin' stuff. In Richardson, Texas, even. And we won't get into IBM's facilities, which are jobbed out to varying fabless companies including some of those foreign vendors.

      Now many companies don't have a clue and the biggest player making stuff is in Taiwan, but we're far from dead in the water- it's just that it's cheaper for many things right now and we all know that the almighty bottom line's more important.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  48. Vindication of the Marines testing the Newton by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    ages ago:

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/hunter-warrior.htm

    Steve Jobs promised that closing down the Newton division would result in innovative devices --- who knew it'd take this long --- I still want a device w/ handwriting recognition and a larger screen though.

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  49. screw by nimbius · · Score: 1

    armor for your humvees, and forget about that interceptor body armor youve been needing for 6 months...

    youre getting only the finest military hardware to fight this war...including a tactical copy of fallout boys latest album.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:screw by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You do realize that body armor has nothing to do with PDA's right? That PDA's do not come at the expense of body armor?

      This product is simply being tested right now. It's not like the DoD ordered a million of them already.

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  50. Re:How much from the Apple store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are in the store, just $10000 per license. Standard Apple pricing.

    Fixed it for ya.

  51. Ballistics calculations for artillery by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Which does no good if the damn gun bunnies read the numbers off the computer wrong.

  52. Clearly they need the new iRack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcjLEwZqcQI

  53. ipod touch is VERY useful... by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    especially the great applications they have...
    like the beer mug,
    the animated lighter,
    the fish pond,
    the cow bell application,
    and countless games.

    Either the people in charge were bribed good amount of cash to make this happen, or they are true idiots. Either way, they are wasting money for no good reason.

  54. The military uses phones? News at 11! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Chances are they already have - but consider, if it's not Apple, it probably wouldn't have made Slashdot.

    Okay, I don't know about PDAs, but phones presumably have been used. "US Military Issues Phones to Soldiers" doesn't sound newsworthy, whether it's Nokia, Motorola or who else, but add an "i" in front of phone, and bingo...

    (There's a trend of common stories made newsworthy by talking about the Iphone - remember that recent story of "You can access this website on an Iphone"?)

    Note that the Iphone is barely mentioned in the story - I can see the Ipod being widely used is significant (although as you say, PDAs are nothing new), but it's a bit misleading to present the Iphone in the summary on an equal footing.

  55. As a proud and happy Apple stock holder... by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

    CHIC-CHING!!! $$ $$$ $$$$ $$$$$ With the right software, iPod Touches and iPhones could actually fly drone aircraft. Type 'FPV plane' into YouTube and enjoy the ride.

  56. Re:AC? That's cool, actually more than cool... by Poltras · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many vietnam veteran does it take to change a lightbulb? you weren't there man, you wouldn't know...

  57. Try these by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

    http://www.tavoproducts.com/ They actually work quite well.

  58. Yeah... by KingAlanI · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heard this a few years back in a political discussion, and I must say I agree with it:

    "I'm pro-bush, but not the George W kind."

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:Yeah... by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      code pink used to protest under signs reading "lick bush and dick"

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
  59. Re:AC? That's cool, actually more than cool... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Not showing much signs of INTELligence, is he?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  60. Old Senators -can- learn new tricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Larry Craig once thought his iPhone with Jailbreak v2.0 was enough to be free in MN ... too bad Larry wasn't aware that the "JailBreak MN" option was available until v2.0 SP1.

    Obviously, Senators are now more in tune with their iPhone capabilities.

  61. COTS =Cheaper !=Better by beer_maker · · Score: 1

    I have now been out longer than I was in (the Marines) but I can tell you that using COTS (Common Off The Shelf, or regular consumer-grade) gear is an idea whose time has come many times already. And yes, REI makes some nice stuff that may be better at one facet of the requirements but that nice stuff fails completely at satisfying other requirements.
    For example, I have purchased several warm coats over the years, but none came with pockets big enough to carry a grenade much less an MRE, while every coat I was ever issued could do so. I wore the same "Field Jacket" for 10+ years and through numerous deployments, which included crawling under vehicles, carrying & installing & recovering (!) barbed wire a zillion times, etc, and the worst damage it suffered was a torn pocket. I wore my new REI jacket skiing and by the time I got home a seam had split and feathers were poking out through the very fabric.
    As to recharging the Touch, as somebody who humped hundreds of pounds of spare batteries over the years, I say YAY! Today's military forces HAVE computers and power outlets, so finding a place to recharge isn't going to be the problem it might have been for Col. Hogan or Rambo.

    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  62. This is Great ! by bruceslog · · Score: 1
    This is Great ! Between drones and ipods, before long we won't even have to send one foot soldier into a country to invade it and wage war !
    War by remote control !

    Well, ok, maybe War by iRemote control.

    Courtesy of Apple Computer.

    --
    If it has tires or tits, it will give you problems.
  63. Coverage by kehren77 · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight, they can get cell coverage for an iPhone in the middle of the Iraqi desert, but I can't get decent AT&T coverage in Minnesota? Lame.

  64. YAY! by s0l1dsnak3123 · · Score: 1

    Finally, Apple has developed a profitable way of making mass murder fun!

    Oh wait...

  65. Makes sense... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Innuendo gets peoples' attention, plain and simple, even if those people are over 13. :P

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  66. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what? so they can use internet and listen to music while they are at work? How lucky, it more sounds like a bonus gift to me, but not necessary.