65. Programming daily. I currently work remotely because of some health issues last year but still get to and present at meetups and conferences.
And I might take an office job again if the work is interesting enough.
I stay current like all the cool kids. I just don't look as hip a my younger peers.
Maybe I didn't understand your comment, but do you believe that medical software doesn't need access to the internet?
Connectivity is actually mandated by some of the meaningful use requirements and there are more coming. That said, the US government has made a lot of incentive money available for people to update their software to meet those requirements, so the 10,000 cost could have been defrayed by some planning on the part of the practitioner.
And, yes, I have spent much of the last 10 years writing medical software in exactly this market.
There was a wind farm in Nantucket
Delivering power by the bucket
Though the U S of A
With it's bucks said "no way"
There were people with yen who could....back it
I was a "sandwich man" when a student at a different Ivy League school. In that case I had no choice but to buy from food services. You were not allowed to sell or deliver to the dorms unless you were authorized by food services.
This is, most likely, a case of Brown having its own service and not wanting the competition.
I grew up with the same thing (AM radio, no less) and I've lost most of my highs in both ears and a lot of everything in my right ear at this point, so mono works fine for me...in fact, listening to some OLD recordings from the sixties and seventies when they really thought that separating the voices into different tracks was cool makes listening on headphones nearly impossible...I get left track only. Although a great take on the backup singers sometimes, depending on the mix.
Frankly, if you stand behind me with a drum and a bass, I'm pretty much set for rest of my life.
I'm not sure reefs grow at that depth. Even deep water reefs are barely over a mile deep. I'm not saying NOTHING is down there, but the junk at 3 miles down isn't keeping a reef from growing.
Depending on your actual need, you might want to check out the Leap motion controller. It CAN track finger position, although not from the same distance, nor in the same way as the Kinect. But more granularity. https://www.leapmotion.com/
To be able to bring a patent infringement lawsuit in these software cases, they should require the lawyers to do the coding live. It would either slow them up, or make the courtroom more interesting. You'd at least have an idea that the people involved knew what they were doing.
What's the big deal? It's 54 degrees here in Texas right now...what? metric? we don't do metric here in Texas. How much is that in 'merican? Wow, that IS hot. Never mind.
In the US, the principle is that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Whether what they did was right or wrong according to our (yours, mine) standards is irrelevant in a court of law...what matters is if they are convicted of doing something illegal.
Another principle of US jurisprudence is that everyone deserves a fair trial including having a lawyer, even if they can't afford one. And that the lawyer is to act on their behalf...again, whether what they did was right or wrong (or even legal or illegal). It is the basis of the innocent until PROVEN guilty thing.
And if I am in court as a defendant, I certainly don't want my lawyer deciding that what I did was wrong so he isn't going to defend me properly.
Like it or not, if the lawyers of the prosecution couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did the deed, he deserves to go free...in the US. And, no, I don't consider that evil.
I'm kind of glad I'm not a lawyer, since I don't need to attempt to persuade a judge that up is down and black is white.
I agree. MFWAL (My father was a lawyer) and he was paid to defend people, whether what they did was right or wrong...and he was very good at his job. So if a lawyer is paid to argue that up is down and black is white, that the lawyer will do.
My father didn't always win (USUALLY, but not always) and I can remember him talking to a con in prison on the phone...very pleasant, cordial, helpful, polite. I questioned him about why he was so nice to the guy, who really was "not a nice person". His reply..."Everybody else is beating up on him in there, somebody should be good to him."
Not all lawyers are evil. That said, I don't think I could do it for a living.
I actually CAN'T argue with his interpretation, since IANAL. He contends that an automobile is sculpture. There is, as I understand it, a large body of law that would say that it is not. I could argue that there is more of a correlation between fashion and the styling of automobiles...fashion which is also not copyrightable for some of the same reasons.
I DO understand copyright, in so far as it affects my life as a writer of software (it does) but in this case, the bat-mo-people are arguing trademark with a crossover into copyright and derivative works.
I suppose I could have just said, "No, your interpretation is probably wrong", but this is/.
You got in an argument with your boss? About weather? And you want to keep this job? If the latter, I'd figure out a way to prove your boss right and then suck up.
Or you can just be right and hungry. Just a thought.
I wonder if GitHub couldn't clear this up by picking a fairly restrictive license (maybe good for personal use, but not for commercial) and make that the default (as opposed to no license, or a very vague one as we see now).
Then if I wanted things looser, I could pick from other licenses, if I wanted things tighter, I could pay the money for the private repositories (again, this is what I do).
The problem is that to make things private costs money...not a LOT of money, but some. But it occurs to me that the intent of making you allow people to download and fork would be to make your code available, not necessarily to enrich the downloaders, but in the spirit of knowledge sharing.
So a default "personal use" license, but no commercial use required on the free GitHub seems like a reasonable compromise...and more explicit than the current situation.
I doubt they'll be calling to ask my opinion, but there it is.
Agreed and I understood that (which is why I have some private repositories). It's the fork part that is "interesting" from a copyright standpoint. What does that really mean, legally (I know what it means technically)? I guess that's why the lawyers continue to do what they do.
Github is a great place to store your repository. It is ALSO a great place to share code with people you want to work with who may or may not be really conversant with git.
Github doesn't claim to provide a repository for open source software...just a place to store repositories which you (as an author) may or may not choose to attach a license to. But that doesn't remove the responsibility of the copier to determine what the license on that software may be. If I copy anything, I need to know if I have the right (copy right) to do that. The onus is and always has been on the copier. That said, the copyright owner is the one who will follow up with violations.
Just because I choose to use github to store my repositories (and, in my case, I use and pay for private repositories for those things that I don't want to share) does not mean that I want everyone in the world to download and use my stuff. I'm an idiot if I am surprised when people DO use my stuff that I make publicly available, but without an explicit license allowing use of my code, it is protected in the US by copyright laws as soon as I write it...and IANAL.
Github is just a great service for those of us who don't want to set up our own repository. They are not a guarantor of free software, nor a nanny to protect me.
Actually I DO and did know the meaning of eponymous...and I was stretching it with the language.
Assad (the person for whom the war is named... eponymous) = A Sad war.
I didn't say it was a good and/or especially clever stretch, but I certainly didn't think that eponymous meant sad...that would be dolorous.
Actually I thought he meant it was "A Sad" fight...which would make eponymous usage correct, although the spelling suspect.
But then I tend to give people the benefit...
Slashdot Mirror
65. Programming daily. I currently work remotely because of some health issues last year but still get to and present at meetups and conferences. And I might take an office job again if the work is interesting enough. I stay current like all the cool kids. I just don't look as hip a my younger peers.
Maybe I didn't understand your comment, but do you believe that medical software doesn't need access to the internet?
Connectivity is actually mandated by some of the meaningful use requirements and there are more coming. That said, the US government has made a lot of incentive money available for people to update their software to meet those requirements, so the 10,000 cost could have been defrayed by some planning on the part of the practitioner.
And, yes, I have spent much of the last 10 years writing medical software in exactly this market.
There was a wind farm in Nantucket ....back it
Delivering power by the bucket
Though the U S of A
With it's bucks said "no way"
There were people with yen who could
I was a "sandwich man" when a student at a different Ivy League school. In that case I had no choice but to buy from food services. You were not allowed to sell or deliver to the dorms unless you were authorized by food services.
This is, most likely, a case of Brown having its own service and not wanting the competition.
I grew up with the same thing (AM radio, no less) and I've lost most of my highs in both ears and a lot of everything in my right ear at this point, so mono works fine for me...in fact, listening to some OLD recordings from the sixties and seventies when they really thought that separating the voices into different tracks was cool makes listening on headphones nearly impossible...I get left track only. Although a great take on the backup singers sometimes, depending on the mix. Frankly, if you stand behind me with a drum and a bass, I'm pretty much set for rest of my life.
Wow, I can see how that would shake your world...it would mine. Everyone knows that it's bathing that causes death, not the other way around.
I'm not sure reefs grow at that depth. Even deep water reefs are barely over a mile deep. I'm not saying NOTHING is down there, but the junk at 3 miles down isn't keeping a reef from growing.
Will it be called Francis?
Depending on your actual need, you might want to check out the Leap motion controller. It CAN track finger position, although not from the same distance, nor in the same way as the Kinect. But more granularity. https://www.leapmotion.com/
To be able to bring a patent infringement lawsuit in these software cases, they should require the lawyers to do the coding live. It would either slow them up, or make the courtroom more interesting. You'd at least have an idea that the people involved knew what they were doing.
Backing up folderol on this. Keep your mouth shut until you talk to YOUR lawyer.
What's the big deal? It's 54 degrees here in Texas right now...what? metric? we don't do metric here in Texas. How much is that in 'merican? Wow, that IS hot. Never mind.
Apple fanboyz don't have bad breath...they're too cool for that.
In the US, the principle is that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Whether what they did was right or wrong according to our (yours, mine) standards is irrelevant in a court of law...what matters is if they are convicted of doing something illegal.
Another principle of US jurisprudence is that everyone deserves a fair trial including having a lawyer, even if they can't afford one. And that the lawyer is to act on their behalf...again, whether what they did was right or wrong (or even legal or illegal). It is the basis of the innocent until PROVEN guilty thing.
And if I am in court as a defendant, I certainly don't want my lawyer deciding that what I did was wrong so he isn't going to defend me properly.
Like it or not, if the lawyers of the prosecution couldn't prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did the deed, he deserves to go free...in the US. And, no, I don't consider that evil.
I agree. MFWAL (My father was a lawyer) and he was paid to defend people, whether what they did was right or wrong...and he was very good at his job. So if a lawyer is paid to argue that up is down and black is white, that the lawyer will do.
My father didn't always win (USUALLY, but not always) and I can remember him talking to a con in prison on the phone...very pleasant, cordial, helpful, polite. I questioned him about why he was so nice to the guy, who really was "not a nice person". His reply..."Everybody else is beating up on him in there, somebody should be good to him."
Not all lawyers are evil. That said, I don't think I could do it for a living.
I actually CAN'T argue with his interpretation, since IANAL. He contends that an automobile is sculpture. There is, as I understand it, a large body of law that would say that it is not. I could argue that there is more of a correlation between fashion and the styling of automobiles...fashion which is also not copyrightable for some of the same reasons. /.
I DO understand copyright, in so far as it affects my life as a writer of software (it does) but in this case, the bat-mo-people are arguing trademark with a crossover into copyright and derivative works.
I suppose I could have just said, "No, your interpretation is probably wrong", but this is
An art student AND a lawyer...that is not a combination you see every day.
You got in an argument with your boss? About weather? And you want to keep this job? If the latter, I'd figure out a way to prove your boss right and then suck up. Or you can just be right and hungry. Just a thought.
I wonder if GitHub couldn't clear this up by picking a fairly restrictive license (maybe good for personal use, but not for commercial) and make that the default (as opposed to no license, or a very vague one as we see now).
Then if I wanted things looser, I could pick from other licenses, if I wanted things tighter, I could pay the money for the private repositories (again, this is what I do). The problem is that to make things private costs money...not a LOT of money, but some. But it occurs to me that the intent of making you allow people to download and fork would be to make your code available, not necessarily to enrich the downloaders, but in the spirit of knowledge sharing.
So a default "personal use" license, but no commercial use required on the free GitHub seems like a reasonable compromise...and more explicit than the current situation.
I doubt they'll be calling to ask my opinion, but there it is.
But can she program A Happy Vertical People Transporter?
http://hitchhikersguidetoearth.wikia.com/wiki/Sirius_Cybernetics_Corporation
Agreed and I understood that (which is why I have some private repositories). It's the fork part that is "interesting" from a copyright standpoint. What does that really mean, legally (I know what it means technically)? I guess that's why the lawyers continue to do what they do.
Github is a great place to store your repository. It is ALSO a great place to share code with people you want to work with who may or may not be really conversant with git.
Github doesn't claim to provide a repository for open source software...just a place to store repositories which you (as an author) may or may not choose to attach a license to. But that doesn't remove the responsibility of the copier to determine what the license on that software may be. If I copy anything, I need to know if I have the right (copy right) to do that. The onus is and always has been on the copier. That said, the copyright owner is the one who will follow up with violations.
Just because I choose to use github to store my repositories (and, in my case, I use and pay for private repositories for those things that I don't want to share) does not mean that I want everyone in the world to download and use my stuff. I'm an idiot if I am surprised when people DO use my stuff that I make publicly available, but without an explicit license allowing use of my code, it is protected in the US by copyright laws as soon as I write it...and IANAL.
Github is just a great service for those of us who don't want to set up our own repository. They are not a guarantor of free software, nor a nanny to protect me.
Actually I DO and did know the meaning of eponymous...and I was stretching it with the language. ... eponymous) = A Sad war.
Assad (the person for whom the war is named
I didn't say it was a good and/or especially clever stretch, but I certainly didn't think that eponymous meant sad...that would be dolorous.
Actually I thought he meant it was "A Sad" fight...which would make eponymous usage correct, although the spelling suspect.
But then I tend to give people the benefit...
You can get sent to jail for experimenting on orphans? Oh bother.