This is Usenet with a capital 'U'. Some crap upload and share service that got hold of the domain www.usenet.com
Before you go down further and start panicking please make note of what he said, it's really important. usenet and Usenet are two very different things.
The response to this article highlights one of my biggest problems with a large section of the science community.
The press release is a loud of baloney, like most press releases geared to the non-scientific community. It's a hard job, explaining such complex ideas to people with no background in the field is always going to be challenging and some fluff will need to be introduced. Only other alternative is to not do it at all, and then the creationists win.
However to attack the scientists who actually did the research is simply out of order. Even if they have overstepped the mark, even if what they have discovered is a load of crap, to mock them is simply not necessary.
I hate IE more than anyone here, but gotta disagree with you.
If you are going to code for one browser, code for IE. It still is the most widely used browser in the world, whether one likes it or not.
The only interaction device that is going to make a mouse/keyboard redundant is a device that interacts directly with the brain.
Until then, mouse is going nowhere. How am I going to play Quake for goodness sake?
Slashdot Mirror
or an MS logo
This is Usenet with a capital 'U'. Some crap upload and share service that got hold of the domain www.usenet.com
Before you go down further and start panicking please make note of what he said, it's really important. usenet and Usenet are two very different things.
Does this mean that MIT will not be publishing anything in Science or Nature? Somehow I don't believe that.
The response to this article highlights one of my biggest problems with a large section of the science community.
The press release is a loud of baloney, like most press releases geared to the non-scientific community. It's a hard job, explaining such complex ideas to people with no background in the field is always going to be challenging and some fluff will need to be introduced. Only other alternative is to not do it at all, and then the creationists win.
However to attack the scientists who actually did the research is simply out of order. Even if they have overstepped the mark, even if what they have discovered is a load of crap, to mock them is simply not necessary.
Thanks dude
I hate IE more than anyone here, but gotta disagree with you. If you are going to code for one browser, code for IE. It still is the most widely used browser in the world, whether one likes it or not.
The only interaction device that is going to make a mouse/keyboard redundant is a device that interacts directly with the brain. Until then, mouse is going nowhere. How am I going to play Quake for goodness sake?
No point at all...
//this one was free..next time i'll charge you :D
"Look at the source code over time?" Not eactly the most straightforward proof ever given to an erroneous statement.
So pardon me if I don't take your word for it.
Same here!!