And you clearly do not have kid's either, or at least shouldn't.
Why would you generalize about teenagers? You either have a problem one yourself or you don't. You either have a solution or you don't. You don't. And no parent lets society and advertising have more influence over their children than they do. Try burning your television.
I think you are that kid that won't talk to his parents.
Tie them up and force them to speak is not an option to a parent. What the hell kind of solution is that anyways? Was that a joke? This is not a joking matter. This whole thread is example of what can happen. Good parenting starts way before that and continues before those types of problems and that communication breakdown happens.
I would disagree with your point, at least the one where you say, "my point is." How the hell could you call someone a good parent if they don't have good kids? That's like saying, "Well, he's a good jeweler, but all his jewelry is pretty ugly and breaks. I don't know what it is." Good kids don't just happen. It's not some genetic trait waiting to be expressed when you hit 16. Good kids are the result of the care and attention of good parents, plain and simple.
You can cite the example of your two friends that are brothers, one is in prison and one is a millionaire, but look back into the parenting and family circumstances and you will find reasons for that. If someone can show me twins at opposite ends of the spectrum, that would give us more to discuss.
I would disagree. How deeply in love can you fall with someone in three days? How deeply can you fall for a person over three weeks, with the same number of similarly enticing messages, just spaced out in time more.
Think about someone rereading letters. Going to the mailbox each day. Physically opening a letter. Getting everything ready to write back. (Oh man, I long for the good old days.) Picking out a heart stamp... that is all much more involved, or we are seriously misraising an entire generation.
I am still of the camp that no one can be held responsible for another's actions.
Your post is driving me into such a rage due to your ignorance of my point that I am going to go on a drinking binge. When I drive home and kill someone, it will be your fault. If only you hadn't posted that, you would not have caused everything I am about to do.
Do you see any problem with that? That is what you are arguing in support of.
That is a very short and limited disclaimer, this is slashdot, and one must consider the entirety of the time-space matrix. I would also add, just to totally cover your ass,
"Due to quantum fluctuations, the comment may cease to exist at any time."
Cool! I'll remember to try that if the site comes back up. In the meantime, i'll be checking my network connection, my proxy settings, and if that doesn't work, i'll call my network admin or provider for assistance.
The layout is pretty, the related results is nice, but the main function... the results... they suck. I was searching for an uncommon sailboat and there were 0 pages returned. Google returns results for the same query... On other searches, the domain name no longer resolved, there were 404s, I got a page that was last visited in 1997, just junk. The results summary needs to be cleaned up also, lots of funky symbols in the results are just noise.
This is the same reason I stopped using Altavista way back when. I don't buy this 120 billion pages thing. You know you can get every article on slashdot on games.slashdot.org, tech.slashdot.org, politics.slashdot.org, etc... I bet they include all those, and every other site that allows you to view message threads 8 different ways. But no results for my first query!
It could be a while before someone is going to beat google at searching. I really do like the alternative approach to displaying search results, so I will at least keep my eye on it.
To you. These videos do not prove the poster's claims, to you. You should probably go clean your ears, because if you can't tell the difference you probably have years of wax build up in there. Or you just don't have an ear for this sort of thing, so are not qualified to comment. People have examined the waveforms, RTFT, and this is happening.
> Last I checked, there wasn't a right to 100% secure long-distance communications in the bill of rights...
Oh, I wasn't aware we only had the rights granted to us. I thought we could do anything except what "they" tell us is illegal. You seem to think we can only do things we have been given the right to do. Don't want to make you think though.
Sorry, your c compiler was backdoored a long time ago already. everything you compile, including all the compilers, get the back door compiled in.
It's too late.
on another note, where is an ethernet trace of Skype doing something underhanded like making a third connection to another machine mid call, or making two or more connections when normally one was just opened? Your network interface doesn't lie. If you are point to point with your called party, you see everything leaving your system. if there was some snooping going on I would expect to see an additional connection. When I am connected to a proxy of any sort all bets are off of course. Until I see this trace, this is all paranoid speculation.
I've heard he can make loops so tight the CPU actually starts spinning so fast it flies apart and explodes!
He can also send long strings of zeros to your network interface, and just when the interface gets used to all those zeros BAM! a ONE comes a long and the cable actually flies out of the connector. Talk about a DoS!
Think you are safe with wireless? Guess again! He has found a pattern of ones and zeros that sets up a 4 level harmonic vibration in any antennae, also causing it to explode. Before it explodes, the vibrations loosen every screw in the room so your desk collapses too.
If any of his code runs while someone is drinking milk in the immediate vicinity, it will start to come out their nose.
So if you see an story entitled "Attack Code for Intel Chips" Don't open it!
p.s. It would be great if he did a proof of concept at the end of his preso and crashed half the world's systems.
I'm tempted but hmmm... this article claims the GM build number is 5A345. I know it's akamai, but look at that url, who knows what that file is. if someone can post some MD5 checksums that prove it's legit, I'm all in.
The OP could be talking about Leopard hosing systems with the beta of BootCamp. I had a system with 10.4 and a beta of BootCamp. Updated to Leopard, rebooted, system was toast. I had to mount my laptop hard drive as a firewire drive, copy my essentials, then had to reformat and reinstall. So it does happen, but I was playing with unreleased software.
I am going to blame Windows for this, however, since this is Slashdot and this is a Mac topic.
I'm calling bullocks. I doubt a Mac Plus has a port you could connect an X-10 camera to, much more than one since the modem would be on the "Modem" serial port. And there were no cell phones in Hypercard/Mac Plus days. Or maybe you are an avid High Times reader complete with the avid High Times reader short term memory loss and you just forgot some details.
Maybe a QuickCam, that eyeball shaped thing that connected to pre USB Macs. And maybe a call to a pager, but I don't know how he would get so much control into the Mac Plus, the thing just didn't have that many I/O options. And if this guy was able to get all this working, he would probably be smart enough to realize that the risk/reward of growing weed vs. using all his hacking skillz was clearly in favor of the option that doesn't land you in jail.
> Methane is far worse as a green house gas than CO2
Your breath smells like ass.
Easy. Make them terrorist shaped.
Nope, and no nipples either.
And you clearly do not have kid's either, or at least shouldn't.
Why would you generalize about teenagers? You either have a problem one yourself or you don't. You either have a solution or you don't. You don't. And no parent lets society and advertising have more influence over their children than they do. Try burning your television.
I think you are that kid that won't talk to his parents.
Tie them up and force them to speak is not an option to a parent. What the hell kind of solution is that anyways? Was that a joke? This is not a joking matter. This whole thread is example of what can happen. Good parenting starts way before that and continues before those types of problems and that communication breakdown happens.
I would disagree with your point, at least the one where you say, "my point is." How the hell could you call someone a good parent if they don't have good kids? That's like saying, "Well, he's a good jeweler, but all his jewelry is pretty ugly and breaks. I don't know what it is." Good kids don't just happen. It's not some genetic trait waiting to be expressed when you hit 16. Good kids are the result of the care and attention of good parents, plain and simple.
You can cite the example of your two friends that are brothers, one is in prison and one is a millionaire, but look back into the parenting and family circumstances and you will find reasons for that. If someone can show me twins at opposite ends of the spectrum, that would give us more to discuss.
Calling someone a fucking hag will get you charged with Fraud? Damn!
I would disagree. How deeply in love can you fall with someone in three days? How deeply can you fall for a person over three weeks, with the same number of similarly enticing messages, just spaced out in time more.
Think about someone rereading letters. Going to the mailbox each day. Physically opening a letter. Getting everything ready to write back. (Oh man, I long for the good old days.) Picking out a heart stamp... that is all much more involved, or we are seriously misraising an entire generation.
I am still of the camp that no one can be held responsible for another's actions.
Dear Chrome stop You are a butt munch stop You will never amount to anything stop You might as well kill yourself stop
Your post is driving me into such a rage due to your ignorance of my point that I am going to go on a drinking binge. When I drive home and kill someone, it will be your fault. If only you hadn't posted that, you would not have caused everything I am about to do.
Do you see any problem with that? That is what you are arguing in support of.
That is a very short and limited disclaimer, this is slashdot, and one must consider the entirety of the time-space matrix. I would also add, just to totally cover your ass,
"Due to quantum fluctuations, the comment may cease to exist at any time."
Easy. Just text "help" to 911.
Cool! I'll remember to try that if the site comes back up. In the meantime, i'll be checking my network connection, my proxy settings, and if that doesn't work, i'll call my network admin or provider for assistance.
and it just got slashdotted...
The layout is pretty, the related results is nice, but the main function... the results... they suck. I was searching for an uncommon sailboat and there were 0 pages returned. Google returns results for the same query... On other searches, the domain name no longer resolved, there were 404s, I got a page that was last visited in 1997, just junk. The results summary needs to be cleaned up also, lots of funky symbols in the results are just noise.
This is the same reason I stopped using Altavista way back when. I don't buy this 120 billion pages thing. You know you can get every article on slashdot on games.slashdot.org, tech.slashdot.org, politics.slashdot.org, etc... I bet they include all those, and every other site that allows you to view message threads 8 different ways. But no results for my first query!
It could be a while before someone is going to beat google at searching. I really do like the alternative approach to displaying search results, so I will at least keep my eye on it.
To you. These videos do not prove the poster's claims, to you. You should probably go clean your ears, because if you can't tell the difference you probably have years of wax build up in there. Or you just don't have an ear for this sort of thing, so are not qualified to comment. People have examined the waveforms, RTFT, and this is happening.
> Last I checked, there wasn't a right to 100% secure long-distance communications in the bill of rights...
Oh, I wasn't aware we only had the rights granted to us. I thought we could do anything except what "they" tell us is illegal. You seem to think we can only do things we have been given the right to do. Don't want to make you think though.
Sorry, your c compiler was backdoored a long time ago already. everything you compile, including all the compilers, get the back door compiled in.
It's too late.
on another note, where is an ethernet trace of Skype doing something underhanded like making a third connection to another machine mid call, or making two or more connections when normally one was just opened? Your network interface doesn't lie. If you are point to point with your called party, you see everything leaving your system. if there was some snooping going on I would expect to see an additional connection. When I am connected to a proxy of any sort all bets are off of course. Until I see this trace, this is all paranoid speculation.
No need to hack, I already logged in and made accounts for you all, just use your local username and password at that address. Login and trash it!
Maybe he is using Avian Carriers?
I've heard he can make loops so tight the CPU actually starts spinning so fast it flies apart and explodes!
He can also send long strings of zeros to your network interface, and just when the interface gets used to all those zeros BAM! a ONE comes a long and the cable actually flies out of the connector. Talk about a DoS!
Think you are safe with wireless? Guess again! He has found a pattern of ones and zeros that sets up a 4 level harmonic vibration in any antennae, also causing it to explode. Before it explodes, the vibrations loosen every screw in the room so your desk collapses too.
If any of his code runs while someone is drinking milk in the immediate vicinity, it will start to come out their nose.
So if you see an story entitled "Attack Code for Intel Chips" Don't open it!
p.s. It would be great if he did a proof of concept at the end of his preso and crashed half the world's systems.
This isn't some kind of POP/SMTP troll flamebait in disguise is it?!?!
I was thinking a toy surprise in each box of Windows but your idea is more yummy!
I'm tempted but hmmm... this article claims the GM build number is 5A345. I know it's akamai, but look at that url, who knows what that file is. if someone can post some MD5 checksums that prove it's legit, I'm all in.
here is a linux, windows and mac version:
netstat -sp tcp
since these packets are spoofed anyways, I don't think seeing the packet will do much good, but a count helps.
The OP could be talking about Leopard hosing systems with the beta of BootCamp. I had a system with 10.4 and a beta of BootCamp. Updated to Leopard, rebooted, system was toast. I had to mount my laptop hard drive as a firewire drive, copy my essentials, then had to reformat and reinstall. So it does happen, but I was playing with unreleased software.
I am going to blame Windows for this, however, since this is Slashdot and this is a Mac topic.
I'm calling bullocks. I doubt a Mac Plus has a port you could connect an X-10 camera to, much more than one since the modem would be on the "Modem" serial port. And there were no cell phones in Hypercard/Mac Plus days. Or maybe you are an avid High Times reader complete with the avid High Times reader short term memory loss and you just forgot some details.
Maybe a QuickCam, that eyeball shaped thing that connected to pre USB Macs. And maybe a call to a pager, but I don't know how he would get so much control into the Mac Plus, the thing just didn't have that many I/O options. And if this guy was able to get all this working, he would probably be smart enough to realize that the risk/reward of growing weed vs. using all his hacking skillz was clearly in favor of the option that doesn't land you in jail.