This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
In a nutshell, in the US you gotta have one person reverse engineer and write documentation, and another write the code.
My understanding is that you don't actually have to do that, but that it's a heck of a lot easier to successfully argue in court that there was no copying if the person who wrote the code *couldn't* have copied it.
As someone who runs the IT for a weekly community paper in addition to my day job, I'm currently trying various methods of reducing the Google effect to less than its current (and steadily increasing by 5-10% per month) 4.5 Mb/s of bandwidth usage for hits from Google search results.
robots.txt?
Re:Fuzzing and Obfuscation
on
Mitnick on OSS
·
· Score: 1
Ah, yes. I missed the part where you wrote, "Agreed./ in your path is bad."
Obviously, Einstein's whims should be taken just as seriously as his major work.
Re:Fuzzing and Obfuscation
on
Mitnick on OSS
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
IIRC, old versions of Slackware (3.5) and Red Hat Linux (5.1) had "." in their default PATH. I remember because I didn't learn about "./" until I switched to Debian.
I find that my level of "sleepiness" depends more on how much sleep I had during the last 3-4 days than how much sleep I had the night before. I also find that although I may feel good when I lack sleep, I tend to act like someone who is slightly drunk.
So, let me get this straight: You think a judge would rule that the mere title of the GPL overrides section 9, even though the GPL consistently refers to itself as "this License", and not "the Program", which is defined in section 0?
As predicted, 2005 was the hottest year since accurate temperature recording began in the late 1800s.
The evidence is a little more compelling than that. Greenhouse gases, which are closely linked with global temperature, are at the highest levels they've been at for the last 650,000 years.
How could someone make a retroactive license change on a released piece of software?
They can't, unless the license contains provisions allowing this. However, they can grant additional permission to distribute the work under another license.
Slashdot Mirror
IIRC, they were software and business-method patents.
IIRC, the computer industry is what it is today because an 800-pound gorilla didn't get its way. That gorilla was IBM.
Perhaps they mean piracy on the high seas? Not software "piracy"?
My understanding is that you don't actually have to do that, but that it's a heck of a lot easier to successfully argue in court that there was no copying if the person who wrote the code *couldn't* have copied it.
robots.txt?
Ah, yes. I missed the part where you wrote, "Agreed ./ in your path is bad."
Next year, it won't work, thanks to antifoidulus.
No, you wouldn't, unless you like scenarios like this:
It's not a subatomic particle; It's a hormone. Procrastin, specifically.
Obviously, Einstein's whims should be taken just as seriously as his major work.
IIRC, old versions of Slackware (3.5) and Red Hat Linux (5.1) had "." in their default PATH. I remember because I didn't learn about "./" until I switched to Debian.
We'll throw some broken helicopters at you!
Apparently everyone who has a degree is an expert...
KB899179 looks curiously like a shade of olive green.
I find that my level of "sleepiness" depends more on how much sleep I had during the last 3-4 days than how much sleep I had the night before. I also find that although I may feel good when I lack sleep, I tend to act like someone who is slightly drunk.
I remain unconvinced.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! So ORIGINAL and FUNNY!
I have three words to say to you: Windows Product Activation.
Blarg. In my RSS viewer, all I saw was "MacWorld's iMac Core Duo Benchmarks Deb...", and I thought the last word was "Debian". I'm so disappointed.
On the other hand, this is Steve Gibson, inventor of non-SYN-cookies, that we're talking about...
Of course he is. This is well-known. ;-)
Where is this stated, in Linux 2.0?
The evidence is a little more compelling than that. Greenhouse gases, which are closely linked with global temperature, are at the highest levels they've been at for the last 650,000 years.
They can't, unless the license contains provisions allowing this. However, they can grant additional permission to distribute the work under another license.