"Wait a second, this introduces an interesting chicken and egg problem. If the phones are made from the tears of those who are upset about the price drop, what are the phones those original zealots overpaid for glued together with?"
The tears of those same fanboys from all the leopard delays of course
No wonder, who'd want to buy a computer running an OS violating hundreds of patents?
Allegedly, as no one (including ms) will disclose what patents are being violated... So we are just believing Microsoft now, and that linux is in fact violating patents? I am going to wait for Microsoft to say which ones are being violated, so the prior art and obviousness of the patents can have them thrown out in court.
According to a theory by Stephen Hawkins dealing with the evaporation of black holes, he says that a black holes own singularity has the ability to escape the massive gravity well generated by it's own, mass, there after disapating into flat regular space. So it could be theorized that other things as well can escape a black hole. If your interested in this, it has to deal with quantum mechanics, and the idea that on a quantum scale, quantum objects can jump from location to location, being a 1-d point, the sigularity falls into this quantum scale, thereby allowing it to adhere to this set of rules. It's fun to ponder, and also seems contrary to popular belief of black holes, but hey, it is all just theory;-)
Yes, theory does say that an object crashing into the ergosphere, but in the end not escaping the event horizion would transfer it's angular momentum to the singularity.
According to theory, the event horizon of a black hole that is not spinning is spherical, and its singularity is (informally speaking) a single point. If the black hole carries angular momentum (inherited from a star that is spinning at the time of its collapse), it begins to drag space-time surrounding the event horizon in an effect known as frame-dragging. This spinning area surrounding the event horizon is called the ergosphere and has an ellipsoidal shape. Since the ergosphere is located outside the event horizon, objects can exist within the ergosphere without falling into the hole. However, because space-time itself is moving in the ergosphere, it is impossible for objects to remain in a fixed position. Objects grazing the ergosphere could in some circumstances be catapulted outwards at great speed, extracting energy (and angular momentum) from the hole, hence the name ergosphere ("sphere of work") because it is capable of doing work. Once all the angular momentum is extracted from a spinning black hole, what do you think happens, it stops spinning.
there have been recent calculations done using the most up to date formulas from quantum mechanics and relativity that predict the existance of enough matter in the universe to nullify the idea of dark matter, that article was on slashdot 4th quarter of last year.
I have to agree, I my self have never paid a dime to google, if they make money off of me looking at an ad less than once a month, good for them. But thats not my money.
Slashdot Mirror
"Wait a second, this introduces an interesting chicken and egg problem. If the phones are made from the tears of those who are upset about the price drop, what are the phones those original zealots overpaid for glued together with?"
The tears of those same fanboys from all the leopard delays of course
Allegedly, as no one (including ms) will disclose what patents are being violated... So we are just believing Microsoft now, and that linux is in fact violating patents? I am going to wait for Microsoft to say which ones are being violated, so the prior art and obviousness of the patents can have them thrown out in court.
I can run Beryl with no lag on my x1900, so the driver support is there for the x1XXX series, your x1300 should work.
Are we talking about bots or other players? ;-)
According to a theory by Stephen Hawkins dealing with the evaporation of black holes, he says that a black holes own singularity has the ability to escape the massive gravity well generated by it's own, mass, there after disapating into flat regular space. So it could be theorized that other things as well can escape a black hole. If your interested in this, it has to deal with quantum mechanics, and the idea that on a quantum scale, quantum objects can jump from location to location, being a 1-d point, the sigularity falls into this quantum scale, thereby allowing it to adhere to this set of rules. It's fun to ponder, and also seems contrary to popular belief of black holes, but hey, it is all just theory ;-)
Yes, theory does say that an object crashing into the ergosphere, but in the end not escaping the event horizion would transfer it's angular momentum to the singularity.
According to theory, the event horizon of a black hole that is not spinning is spherical, and its singularity is (informally speaking) a single point. If the black hole carries angular momentum (inherited from a star that is spinning at the time of its collapse), it begins to drag space-time surrounding the event horizon in an effect known as frame-dragging. This spinning area surrounding the event horizon is called the ergosphere and has an ellipsoidal shape. Since the ergosphere is located outside the event horizon, objects can exist within the ergosphere without falling into the hole. However, because space-time itself is moving in the ergosphere, it is impossible for objects to remain in a fixed position. Objects grazing the ergosphere could in some circumstances be catapulted outwards at great speed, extracting energy (and angular momentum) from the hole, hence the name ergosphere ("sphere of work") because it is capable of doing work. Once all the angular momentum is extracted from a spinning black hole, what do you think happens, it stops spinning.
there have been recent calculations done using the most up to date formulas from quantum mechanics and relativity that predict the existance of enough matter in the universe to nullify the idea of dark matter, that article was on slashdot 4th quarter of last year.
I have to agree, I my self have never paid a dime to google, if they make money off of me looking at an ad less than once a month, good for them. But thats not my money.
Ok teacher man, I am an undergrad math major and I know your wrong... the percent would actually be 0.4% if you need more proof, click here