All we "know" today is that what we DO understand DOESN'T explain telepathic communication. I suppose if you were working on the idea that we know everything, you could have some basis... But come on (and this isn't just some lame "truth" philosophy talking here) you can never "know" for certainty that something doesn't exist. The most cutting edge science right now is still trying to prove what DOES exist (dark matter, gravity waves...)
Who knows what we don't know yet. That's why it's called "what we don't know"
Also, just pulling up a theory and misapplying it doesn't prove your point. Where was it written that telepathy was "without a physical channel"? You're the only one to say that, and throwing out that unfounded assumption makes your wiki_link irrelevant.
Granted, I typed in Bush under the "company" box rather than the box to complain about a person (which is why it writes "Bush sticking its proboscis" instead of "his"), but still, it's eerily similar to the daily frothing at the mouth rants that Leftists spew out about the President. Is this how war protesters write their speeches? By using auto-generators?
I wouldn't put it past them, considering that they've been repeating the same things over and over again, that they are flailing for originality.
I'm not entirely sure you understand the difference between the concepts of "donation" and "print names on the wings". See, the latter is usually refered to as "sponsorship".
And the concept here is hardly fuel economy. Think about how many/. nerds read this article, and if that ornithopter was developed "in collaboration with XYZ Corp." that would be great for their image. I feel like there are a good few firms that might like to be a part of that.
That's a little concept we like to call "visual horsepower", as opposed to "actual horsepower".... seems only logical that the same thing should apply to supercomputers
IANAE of supercomputers by any means, but to me it seems that the first 57.3 terra flops makes adding the other 2.15 terra flops rather superfluous. Isn't that like DuctTaping an Estes-C onto a Saturn V?
I'm clearly not the first to post about the parallels with 80's T-shirt technology, but....
I think it's interesting that the Hypercolor wikipdeia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercolor
makes specific mention of pH opening and closing lactone rings. If I'm not mistaken this is the exact same color-changing technology that made "colored bubbles" possible (previously mentioned TWICE on/.)
Apparently that color-changing science should not have been NEARLY so elusive as it was to the guy in his kitchen. Now real scientists have applied it to every body and their brothers' Supra, sweet.
Slashdot Mirror
Who knows what we don't know yet. That's why it's called "what we don't know"
Also, just pulling up a theory and misapplying it doesn't prove your point. Where was it written that telepathy was "without a physical channel"? You're the only one to say that, and throwing out that unfounded assumption makes your wiki_link irrelevant.
I, for one, welcome our new beer-volcano/stripper-factory overlord
I myself think it's interesting that there are actually "penetration engineers" at Microsoft.
......
Makes sense, after all. I've always kinda felt like MS was giving it to us all up the
Well, now you can poop gold-coated DNA.
I'm pretty sure this is gonna be WAAAY less gold that that. To a lot of scientists, if you can see it, it's a lot.
I think what you mean is "if make-up gets you hot"... because it certainly made her hot(or hotter)
Ummm... I'm not sure where exactly you think the Sun is.....
I'm not entirely sure you understand the difference between the concepts of "donation" and "print names on the wings". See, the latter is usually refered to as "sponsorship".
/. nerds read this article, and if that ornithopter was developed "in collaboration with XYZ Corp." that would be great for their image. I feel like there are a good few firms that might like to be a part of that.
And the concept here is hardly fuel economy. Think about how many
Oh, and tell Orville and Wilibur to screw off... 12 seconds, ptttth. Clearly nothing will ever come of these "flying machines"
Huh, well 4 outta 5 ain't bad
Shakes on a plane
From TFA: NASA astronauts visited the moon during the late 1960s and early 1970s under the Apollo program but have not returned.
Those astronauts, who sacrificed so willingly, sitting up there all alone on the Moon for thirty years...
That's a little concept we like to call "visual horsepower", as opposed to "actual horsepower".... seems only logical that the same thing should apply to supercomputers
IANAE of supercomputers by any means, but to me it seems that the first 57.3 terra flops makes adding the other 2.15 terra flops rather superfluous. Isn't that like DuctTaping an Estes-C onto a Saturn V?
I'm clearly not the first to post about the parallels with 80's T-shirt technology, but....
/.)
1 7/2250259&tid=159&tid=142 3/0638216&tid=159&tid=14
I think it's interesting that the Hypercolor wikipdeia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercolor
makes specific mention of pH opening and closing lactone rings. If I'm not mistaken this is the exact same color-changing technology that made "colored bubbles" possible (previously mentioned TWICE on
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/
Apparently that color-changing science should not have been NEARLY so elusive as it was to the guy in his kitchen. Now real scientists have applied it to every body and their brothers' Supra, sweet.