Slashdot Mirror


OfficeMax Drops Mail-in Rebates

DrEldarion writes "Looks like OfficeMax is dropping mail-in rebates. 'Rebates were the #1 customer complaint we were getting,' said Ryan Vero, OfficeMax's chief merchandising officer. Hopefully other retailers will realize what a good idea this is and follow suit." The best part is that the discount is applied now at the register, so those of us who always thought that the rebates were a scam (or were too lazy to mail in the card) finally get some savings.

321 comments

  1. My solution by Embedded2004 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just don't shop at places that have mail-in rebates. Period.

    1. Re:My solution by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do not shop at stores with rebates or do not buy products with rebates? I think just about every computer and electronics retailer uses mail in rebates (which hopefully that changes). You must have a long list of places to avoid. I only buy products with rebates if I was going to buy that specific model anyway but I still look at the inital cost when comparing. Some examples would be my Sirius radio and service, my cell phone and a few others.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:My solution by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I have received good prices through rebates and have yet to not be given what was listed. Seems like there are a lot of people out there like me. In fact there are rebate hunters and rebate websites for tracking now.

    3. Re:My solution by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative

      What pisses me off is having to pay the full sales tax on the artificially inflated price, not the true (or "rebate") price.

      "Look, its $200.00, but they have a $50.00 instant rebate, plus $100.00 mail-in rebate ... " but you're still taxed on $200.00, for what is in reality a $50.00 purchase.

    4. Re:My solution by denebian+devil · · Score: 1

      Same here. If I could get the same item for the same price without resorting to a rebate, I'd be happier, but I'm more than happy to put up with mailing in a rebate if it means some serious savings. And I've yet to have to strong arm the rebate provider into sending me what I'm due.

      Plus, I even got a bonus just the other day from buying an item on rebate: I had a coupon for $15 off a $100 purchase, which I would have never reached had one of the items I was buying not had a sizable rebate connected with it. There's also the occasional advantage of getting free shipping on items "over $25" or whatever the minimum is, when the item you're getting won't actually cost you that much once you get the rebate back. So there are definitely ways to take advantage of the rebate system.

    5. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a 50.00 purchase, it's a 200.00 purchase that they are giving you 150.00 worth of incentive to buy.

    6. Re:My solution by rgspb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hoo-wee, we got us a smart one here fellers!

    7. Re:My solution by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well then, if it's really a $200 purchase I'm sure that he can write off the full value of that purchase on his income tax return this year.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:My solution by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... or are they going to make me declare the "$150.00 incentive" as income ...?

      Oops - quick, burn all copies of this post, or we'll be giving the undead another vein to suck the lifeblood from ...

    9. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't reply to morons. Period.

      OH WAIT

    10. Re:My solution by massysett · · Score: 1
      I just don't shop at places that have mail-in rebates. Period.

      Wow, that's a bit extreme. I don't consider rebates when I'm deciding what to buy. So if one product is $50 with a $25 mail-in rebate, and the other product is $49.99 with no rebate, I'll take the $49.99 one.

      If after this decision-making process I have a product that has a rebate anyway, I will mail it in unless the rebate is for a trivial amount. Might as well collect the money.

    11. Re:My solution by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What pisses me off is having to pay the full sales tax on the artificially inflated price, not the true (or "rebate") price.

      Well, I'm glad you stop getting pissed off there.

      For the life of me, I cannot figure out why my $15.00 phone bill costs me $30.00 (round numbers accurate to less than +-$1.00).

      I'm wanting to go to a completely grey/black/p2p market, and not do "normal" business with abnormal businesses.

      Everything I pay for on the "white" market is between 10-100% more than the "price". When I buy things "on the street", the price is the price, and its usually round numbers, not $99.99 + mystery funds so that my $100 bill does not work any more.

      Between the inflated prices at "legitimate" businesses, and then the taxes that get taken out of my pay check before I even get paid -- yes, I know I could manipulate this, but I'm tired and lazy of having to fight for every penny of the money that I make. In fact, I'm sick and tired of it, to the point that I've just succumbed to giving all of my money away, and just not caring anymore. What do I need it for? I can't take it with me when I die, and its also practically illegal to own cash that is not even backed by hard currency either, so what is the point?

      Yeah, I'm fairly ambiently pissed off at the time because I'm in the process of downsizing myself at the request of the federal government, inflation, and some financial mistakes that I have made. I'll be alright, I mean I'm still above American average and supposedly way above the average in the world or whatever, but I'm not happy about being chronically pickpocketed with no legal recourse. I mean, even civil litigation against a corporation is _very_ timely, and _very_ expensive to the point that the gamble just does not seem worth the effort when its all said and done. I've been involved with civil cases against companies where they are clearly at fault, and if it were up to me to take care of it the old fashioned way, I would just break their kneecaps and call it even. But instead, the lawyers get their subsidies and play good lawyer/bad lawyer against each other, while they are actually for each other because the more they pretend to fight each other, the more money they make for doing nothing.

      Yeah, I need a chill pill, but I ran out. I guess I just have to get used to living in a 3rd world country, but I was kinda getting accustomed to the middle class in the 1st world country, but that is disappearing as I type this. I know a number of people that feel the same way, and have settled up or avoided their debts and have simply dropped out of the American dream just to live their own. I openly ask people around the world where is a good place to live, and you know what? There is no definitive answer. So, I guess we just need to all take a dose of the opiate for the masses, and find a free/cheap religion. /rant -- I almost feel better :)

    12. Re:My solution by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod you up ... I think a LOT of us are unhappy with this "brave new world" and feel we've been lied to/cheated/manipulated.

    13. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a dumbass. You're not taxed on $200. You're taxed on $150. It's an INSTANT REBATE. And who the hell cares anyway? Don't like it? Don't buy it.

    14. Re:My solution by 3seas · · Score: 1

      full taxes pre rebates...

      Guess this explains why the FTC has what is pretty much a form letter they send out telling you they can't do much of anything unless they get enough complaints about some specific rebate.

      I bet they actually do get plenty for any specific rebate.... but why would they tell you this when its less work for them and only those actually getting rebates in essence gives their parent organization more kickback.... uh errr I mean taxes without representation....

      it's amazing how their are those who will cost you 100+ times the amount they actually might get in screwing you you out of something.

      rebate processing companies practice the use of complexity to cause human failure at meeting overly complicated rebates and contribute to such failure as much as they possibly can. The first sign of complexity is "mail in" and should be a indication of potential intent to commit consumer fraud.

      Now if a store can admit their biggest complaint is mail in rebates, then what the fuck is the FTC really doing with all the complaints?

      File 13?

    15. Re:My solution by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      You're a dumbass. You're not taxed on $200. You're taxed on $150. It's an INSTANT REBATE. And who the hell cares anyway? Don't like it? Don't buy it.

      Hey, asswipe, in MY jurisdiction you're taxed on ALL rebates, both mail-in AND at the cash.

      Read what I wrote:

      What pisses me off is having to pay the full sales tax on the artificially inflated price, not the true (or "rebate") price.

      "Look, its $200.00, but they have a $50.00 instant rebate, plus $100.00 mail-in rebate ... " but you're still taxed on $200.00, for what is in reality a $50.00 purchase.

      That's what I have to pay. Didn't say it was everyone, everywhere ... there are different rules for different jurisdictions. Your experience isn't necessarily going to be the same as mine or someone elses. Or did you forget what YMMV means?

      If an item is $10.00, with an $10.00 instant rebate, I still pay the tax on the full $10.0.

    16. Re:My solution by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      If your gonna give it all away, I'll get in line. But after you give it to me, I'll go buy gems, jewelry, gold, etc.. things that ARE tradeable if you know the right folks. And, if you produce a small service (say fix computers, like I occasionally do on the side..) then you use the BARTER system... Say a case of beer or the neighbor who has a ridermower so I have a weekend I don't have to pushmow it, etc... etc...

      We all have to live in the "system", but the fun part is learning where & when you can circumvent it...

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    17. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if one product is $50 with a $25 mail-in rebate, and the other product is $49.99 with no rebate, I'll take the $49.99 one.

      How about this: I'll sell it to you for $49.98 and make $24.98 profit. Everybody wins!

    18. Re:My solution by 70Bang · · Score: 1



      I don't see how the initial poster with this thread's title could manage to list all of the non-conformists and would have to continually keep it current, no how matter how many people are at play at any time.

      The shorter list, however, would be to maintain a list of those who have white hats (good guys). It's then easier for people to browse and more elite. If a company wants to be on the [short] list, it's obvious what they need to be done to get onto and remain on the list.

      If someone's not on the list & complains about it, they can also be put on an alternative list for grievances & the outcome of them?

      Summary: If you've got 1'000 items which deal with one subject, wouldn't it be easier to list whichever one is shorter than the longes?

      (or provide users a choice of the two [lists])

    19. Re:My solution by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      8 weeks of processing pisses me off to no end...
      Tivo Rebates absolutely suck. 8 weeks to "process" aka, they wanted me to forget about it. They have no complaint department and it took a consumer fraud report to the State AG to get them to send it out. it was "processed and verified" within 2 weeks. What is really sad is that I sent out my Federal taxes the same day and recieved that 13 days later, 8 weeks later I get my much smaller tivo rebate.

      They try to claim that the mail takes 3 weeks....yeah right they also said they sent it, that it will be sent on this day, then they said this day (3 weeks difference on those two claims)

      Basically to work for a rebate company you have to enjoy stealing from people because that is what your job description is.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    20. Re:My solution by EndlessNameless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He has a sales receipt that shows he paid $200. I don't see why he couldn't do just that.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    21. Re:My solution by 2cb · · Score: 1

      I stopped shopping at stores were I had bad experiences with rebates: OfficeMax, BestBuy, CompUSA, TigerDirect. I have had great luck with the Staples rebates. Just fill in a number on the web and get a check in 2-3 weeks. Contrast that with other experiences. I let the principal of the thing get to me and end up fighting way too hard for way too little money. For a $15 Logictech mouse I ended up going back and forth 5 times via email to eventually get my check 10 weeks later (each time encluding a scan of the original submission). For one rebate from TigerDirect, I submitted a complaint to the Attorney General of California. After that I got my $20 check.

    22. Re:My solution by mulhollandj · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a company called cyberrebate? Everything was free after rebate and they sent rebates for a while and then went 'bankrupt'. They had artificially inflated prices and people would used credit cards with the cash back option and didn't mind until people lost thousands and some hundreds of thousands of dollars. I bet some people got really big bonuses right before they went under.

    23. Re:My solution by publius_jr · · Score: 1
      Were I a modern-day patriot, I would be notifying the IRS of your mis-interpretation of the Income Tax statutes. Barter transactions are taxable. But I rather admire your skirting of the system.


      Still, maybe you have fun living in a fucked-up system, since it allows you to be a nominal rebel by doing what is on a moral basis, most likely, right. I am not so masochistic. I would have more fun changing the system so that I could do what is right without becoming a criminal.

    24. Re:My solution by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      If an item is $10.00, with an $10.00 instant rebate, I still pay the tax on the full $10.0.

      Exactly how it works in California. My $10 phone ended up costing $50 after fees adn taxes.
      A $1000 computer has $85 in taxes, even though it was advertised for $500 after rebates.

    25. Re:My solution by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Were I a modern-day patriot, I would be notifying the IRS of your mis-interpretation of the Income Tax statutes. Barter transactions are taxable. But I rather admire your skirting of the system.

      Ah, but for those "higher up" in the system, they receive referrals, kickbacks, and other fringe benefits that too fit under the radar much more than barter does.

      Also, I remember patriots that used to throw goods into harbors and say things like "we are against taxation without representation", but today's patriots just take it. Thats progress because everybody wins with no controversy, right?

    26. Re:My solution by RMB2 · · Score: 1
      I would have more fun changing the system...
      How's that going for you?
      --
      [/sarcasm]
    27. Re:My solution by TenLow · · Score: 1

      You could always just not send in the rebates. That way you're paying the correct amount of sales tax on your purchase.

    28. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't shop at places that have mail-in rebates. Period.

      You 21st century rebel you. Go get em Tiger!

    29. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an idea. You could start an underground organisation where members hit each other and later level buildings.

      You could call it.. I don't know.. Fight Club or something.

    30. Re:My solution by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      I went in a CompUSA once, and got behind a lady in the checkout lane, she had a Compaq computer in a box that she was buying. She tried to tender the net price, which was about $400.00, and the clerk told her it was $600.00, and explained about the rebate.
      The lady cancelled the sale, and walked out of the store.
      The clerk then rang up my small purchase, and gave me the receipt. It still had the cancelled transaction on it.
      Good to see that some of the stores are giving up on rebates.
      I notice that PC's are bundled with lots of extras, such as printers, etc. and each item has a couple of rebates, in addition to store rebates, anything they can think of, to bring the price down to what the public wants to see in the big print. Imagine, a computer with all those extras for $300.00! What a deal.
      You do get your rebates back if you spend the time to fill out and copy all of the required items.
      Meanwhile, you are loaning the store some money.
      Isn't that the way Banks work?
      You deposit your paycheck. You write checks to draw all of it out, but not all at once, and a lot of those checks take a while to come back into the Bank to be paid.
      Meanwhile, they make someone a loan with that money, and earn interest on that. Sure, you spend all of your deposited money, but other depositors come along in an endless line to replace that.
      So, the loaned money is always there, in cash. They can make more loans and make more money.
      True also with CompUSA, Office Depot. Someone is using the rebate money while the 6 to 8 weeks it takes for processing rolls along. You send your rebate forms off to Egypt, where a small team of rebate processors fools around with your forms. Smoking breaks, Coffee breaks, lunch hours, days off, while your rebate forms languish on the desks. Probably a sign on the wall that says, "Take Your Time!"
      The public is to blame, they want a nice PC for only $300.00. So, they give it them, in a round about way.

    31. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern day patriots (and there is a patriot movement, completely separate from the neocon fascist movement or the neo liberal communist movement) realise the federal reserve note is a complete fraud, it is counterfeit US money, and the IRS is an incorporated for-profit organization that operates an extortion racket on people for such a long time now it has become "legitimate" to most people. The fiat bank "notes" they create out of thin air have no need for income taxation, all that is, is forced at gun point social engineering. Think about it, they are created out of thin air, backed by zip. Taxes are an anachronism going back to ye olden days when real tangible goods were taken, or precious metal coinage "portable wealth" taken as taxes, because that was all ther wealth there was. With them just running computer entries and printing presses, there is no longer any need for income taxation, the government could run itself quite easiy by only printing up "enough" money and not inflating the amount beyond what productivity dictates. Now the central bankers love the system, they can place you and your heirs in perpetual "debt" to them merely by you using their "debt notes".

    32. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhhh.. Yeah right dip shit. I bet most of the places you shop at do mail in rebates.

      You're not too eliete for the rest of the world ass hole.

    33. Re:My solution by publius_jr · · Score: 1

      I was using doublespeak. Obviously there is nothing very patriotic about the thievery of property and liberty that is our government's modus operandi. My use of "modern-day patriot" refers to what our society thinks is a patriot, not what actually is a patriot. In my opinion a modern-day patriot (in my sense) is not only not a patriot (in your sense), he is its antithesis--someone striving to destroy the notions of property and liberty that the true patriot fights to preserve.

    34. Re:My solution by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this is another way to get a little more money out of you. If you get the rebate, the company probably only has to submit the sales tax on the net amount after the rebate to the government. The rest goes straight into their pocket. Some states have close to 10% sales tax, so this can be significant.

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    35. Re:My solution by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      The way it works here is they have to submit it all, and there's no refund to the consumer of the taxes paid when calculating the refund (inother words, a $10.00 rebate is just that, $10.00, not $10.00 plus taxes). The governments love it. Here the feds get 6% (it was just lowered from 7% last week) and Quebec gets 7.5% (and they get the 7.5% on the 6% as well - tax on tax, if you will).

      Obviously the governments aren't going to try to "correct" this.

    36. Re:My solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything I pay for on the "white" market is between 10-100% more than the "price". When I buy things "on the street", the price is the price, and its usually round numbers, not $99.99 + mystery funds so that my $100 bill does not work any more.

      You can send me all them inoperative $100 bills. I'm not sure I can fix them, but if I can't, I'll dispose of them so they won't take up valuable landfill space.

    37. Re:My solution by maverick02 · · Score: 1

      dropping mail in rebates? Isn't that their way of getting people to buy items at retail price and counting on statistics that not enough will apply or be eligible for the rebate due to some technicality? How is instant in store rebates going to pay off for them...?

    38. Re:My solution by maverick02 · · Score: 1
      You send your rebate forms off to Egypt, where a small team of rebate processors fools around with your forms. Smoking breaks, Coffee breaks, lunch hours, days off, while your rebate forms languish on the desks. Probably a sign on the wall that says, "Take Your Time!"
      hahahaha.. that was funny :)
    39. Re:My solution by rbannon · · Score: 1

      Well said!

      Sad truth . . . Americans are so well hated in most parts of the world that you can't leave the USA.

    40. Re:My solution by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you are not the first person I've heard discussing the disappearance of the middle class. This country is rapidly changing into a facist 3rd world country. China and Russia are still big growing dogs, but we're struggling to keep our pride and clout. It looks to me like America is going down like the titanic unless someone can manage to wake everyone else up before we hit that iceberg.

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    41. Re:My solution by glassjaw+rocks · · Score: 1

      That's because they use pidgeons to send your rebate.

      --
      -gjr
    42. Re:My solution by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      I agree totally. The truth is probably something closer to folks online organizing so that OfficeMax has a much higher payout on the rebates than they did before. Plus them having to make sure they dont mix rebates and end up giving out great deals.

      They probably just aren't bilking the forgetful like they were before.

  2. SMART DECISION by wolfie_cr · · Score: 0, Troll

    next time I buy ANYTHING that normally carries a rebate.......officemax will get MY business time to follow suit bestbuy or circuit city?????? btw also get rid of those idiotic PSP plans!

    1. Re:SMART DECISION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thaw your punctuation and it will spread more easily and not bunch up in one place that way.

  3. I wouldn't call it a scam by scenestar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but a scheme.

    those of us who always thought that the rebates were a scam (or were too lazy to mail in the card) finally get some savings.

    Because not everyone will ask for their rebate retailers are able to squeeze more cash out of their customers.

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When asking for your rebate involves mailing in the card, calling the rebate company twice at 8 weeks intervals to complain that you didn't receive anything, having made photocopies of your receipt and card, and claiming your rebate in the small courts against a company which doesn't exist anymore... it starts to look like a scam.

    2. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by 4e617474 · · Score: 1

      I would call it a scheme that inherently involves an amount of scamming. There was a rebate that I got refused because they say I didn't include everything I was supposed to. I was a Medical Laboratory Technician at the time and keeping up with the flow of paperwork when they puncture your spine to test your CSF, I promise you I didn't overlook anything simple.
       
      Why would a company go through the hassle of rebates? They pay postage on a check when you get your money instead of the clerk hitting a key on the register. They pay people to open envelopes, check dates, figure out whether enclosed receipts are originals or photocopies, put names and addresses in a database (which means they're paying a database administrator), they pay to print checks, they're spending money all over the place. They do all that and they still come out ahead of where they would be if you just paid at the register what they told you it was going to cost.
       
      Maybe not exactly a scam, but not exactly my idea of an honest business practice. Especially when it really is a scam.

      --
      Finally modding someone offtopic when they rant about what "Begging the Question" means: priceless.
    3. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rebates aren't a "scam" by any stretch of the imagination. If you are too lazy to send the rebate form off, then you aren't going to get it. Very simple. Companies DO count on people not sending in rebate forms, they base the amount of the rebate on projected sales and the percentage of rebate forms they expect to receive. The amount of money that the company loses is going to stay the same if they move to instant rebates. If they had a mail in with a 50% take rate that was worth $10, then the instant will be $5 dollars. They aren't out any money, just the people who take the time to send in the damned form are.

    4. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by asylumx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I don't know where folks get off expecting a store not to try and make money. Here's how it works:

      #1 As the parent stated, not all recipients of the rebate form will actually do the work to apply for the rebate.
      #2 Those that do, are not paid for 6-8 weeks. That is 2 months of interest accruing on that money for the retailer.
      #3 The rebates also are a way to collect information on customers, so that the company who backs the rebate can then target their advertising more efficiently.
      #4 Rebates allow the manufacturer of a product to apply a discount without having to change their contract with the retailer.
      #5 Rebates often times are in response to a combined purchase of a mix of products that fit well together, but are from different companies. This relates to #4 where you as a retailer would not want to take this hit yourself because you don't really care what combination you sell.

      They aren't a scam at all, in fact I've never sent one in (with the correct information) and not received a check for the amount advertised. I don't like them, personally, so I just ignore the "after rebate" price. If I can find the "no-rebate" price cheaper elsewhere, I get it there. Otherwise, I buy it and send in the rebate. 2 months later it's like I have a little Christmas present in the mail.

    5. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to ignore when it gets to a certain point.

      FOr example, this week at fry's. 17 inch monitor $99 after rebate. That's a full $50 less than any non-rebate sale price so far.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    6. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by penix1 · · Score: 1

      No, it's a scam when you see the price listed as "$150.00*" it is a misleading advertising scam. That "*" will lead you to the VERY fine print reading "after $100.00 rebate". Anything that intentionally misleads you into thinking you are getting something for one price while being charged another is a scam in my book.

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    7. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by sfontain · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Quote:

      but a scheme.

      those of us who always thought that the rebates were a scam (or were too lazy to mail in the card) finally get some savings.

      Because not everyone will ask for their rebate retailers are able to squeeze more cash out of their customers.

      End quote.

      The problem with your analysis is you completely overlook all the people (myself included) who diligently mail in their rebates and never receive payment.

      I've started taking digital photos of all my packaging, UPCs, rebate forms, and envelopes addressed to the rebate people. I would say that literally the majority of the time I send in a rebate form, I never get the rebate. After about 2 months with no check, I print and mail the digital photos of my rebate stuff, throw in a hint of legal action, and my rebates magically arrive within about 5 business days.

    8. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by v1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had fairly good luck in getting my rebates filled in the past, having redeemed maybe a dozen mail-in rebates for various things. I did run into a problem on the last one, a hard drive at Tiger Direct, $50 rebate on a seagate 250. It was one of those things where they say to mail in the original bar code, yet the bar code exists in only one place, on the label on the hard drive. Not wanting to peel the label off my HD, I included a scan of it. They also said that the rebate form MUST match the name on the invoice AND the credit card. My full name is on my card, and my short common name is on the receipt. And they always wait as long as possible before replying to your rebate, the usual scam is "expect 8-12 weeks for your rebate" and "unfilled rebates must be counter-claimed within 14 weeks of purchase". They give you as small of a window of appeal as possible between the last possible day you might receive the check and the very last day they will accept an appeal due to your not receiving said check. And to help this process along they mail out your check at the last possible moment if at all. I have never seen anyone receive their rebate check earlier than one week before the last possible day it might arrive.

      So the $50 rebate disappeared into the Rebate Black Hole and I had to send them another claim. A full two months later I actually did get a check, but that was what, almost half a year after I bought the drive. I wonder how much interest they made on my $50 check over the course of 5 months, multiplied by how many thousands of customers?

      I don't know the exact details of how they handle rebates, but many companies simply sell them to rebate centers, as obligations. So my $50 rebate was sold to this rebate center for maybe $-45. (they received $45 to accept the obligation of the rebate) Then if they have to cut you a check, they lose $5. But if you fail to ask for the rebate, they clear $45. So it is to their advantage to make you jump through lots of hoops, give you numerous opportunities to submit an invalid or incomplete request, and under no circumstances do they tell you if your submission was rejected.

      I would imagine that out of say, 100 initial rebate requests that are rejected, only 5 of the customers actually catch it in time and resubmit to get their rebate. The rest forget about it by the time the deadline has arrived for them to receive their check, and by the time they realize they never got a check, it's too late to resubmit. I would be very interested to know what their statistics are... does anyone have any hard numbers for any of the rebate centers?

      - percentage of rebate submissions initially rejected (guessing 40%)
      - percentage of rejected submissions where the consumer received notice of rejection (guessing 0%)
      - percentage of initial rejections that were followed up by a resubmission from the customer, in time (guessing 10%)
      - percentage of resubmissions that were not fulfilled for any reason (guessing 20%)
      - percentage of submitted rebates that resulted in a check (guessing 60%)

      If I'm anywhere near accurate in my guestimates, they are filling up big lawn and leaf bags with our cash. But it seems that if you are dilligent, you have very good chances of getting your money, albeit with a fight. They are just making it soooo easy for you to NOT get your rebate that they can rake in the cash at our expense.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    9. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think the rebate per se is a scam: what's dishonest is the way prices are advertised.

      In many cases, the HUMONGOUS BIG FONT price on the item is the price after the rebate -- not what you actually have to pay to the cashier. This is illegal in some states (as it should be), but when it's not, the retailers love to do it.

      Depending on how it's done, rebates can border on a bait-and-switch: you decide to buy the widget because of the 'price after rebate,' but you don't know until you get up to the register and get the rebate form -- in many cases after you pay the inflated price -- exactly what you have to do in order to GET that price.

      Also, in many cases there are artificial restrictions on the rebates which keep you from getting the item at that price. (Limit one per family, etc.) So that price that you think you're going to be able to pay is really only good on the first item -- after that, you have to pay the inflated price. Woe onto you if you buy more than one. I understand it's a caveat emptor world, but sometimes the stores have gone too far.

      I'm glad to see OfficeMax doing what it's doing, and I hope that other stores will follow suit.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    10. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Penicillus · · Score: 1

      I bought a Western Digital hard drive from Office Max and mailed both the Western Digital and the Office Max rebate to the Office Max rebate center in the same envelope, as was requested. Western Digital sent me a rebate check; I got an email from Office Max saying they hadn't received my rebate form, and that was tough. I haven't been back to Office Max since.

    11. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by humphrm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my opinion, I've never seen a rebate that wasn't a scam. Even if I got a check. Examples:

      - Dell advertises a notebook computer the weekend after Black Friday last year, matching Wal-Mart's in-store price. Mysteriously, after the order is placed, the system that is automatically supposed to give you links to rebate forms says it can't find a qualifying rebate for this product. Instructions: Wait until you get your receipt (2-3 weeks, with shipment of product), send that with the *generic* rebate form (which you have to go dig up yourself), hope that someone bright enough to remember 3 weeks ago recognizes that, indeed, a rebate was offered, and if all the stars align correctly, you'll get a check. Amazingly, I did. Four months later.

      - Micro Center offers a rebate if you buy Product X and Product Y together, you buy the stuff on Tuesday and stuff all the receipts and forms into your to-do pile for Saturday, only to find in small print on Saturday that your rebate forms had to be submitted within three business days of the receipt date.

      - Compusa offers a rebate on online purchases of a flat=panel monitor; you order it and your order is queued and credit card charged. You download the rebate form and it says you need to include the bar code from the box. The shipment is, naturally delayed due to unforseen circumstances (who knew all these people would want a flat panel monitor at this price????) Then when you get it, the rebate is expired. Spend several months with some anonymous outsourced third party non-english-speaking CSR's and eventually after threats of legal action they begrudgingly send you a check, which still takes six to eight weeks to arrive.

      I've got many stories like this, which is why I stopped buying rebate items, usually someone is willing to match the rebate price without a rebate, and they get my business. Now Office Max will be off my black list. Congrats to Office Max.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    12. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I see "rebate" and that turns me off, even if it's legitimate. I've only been screwed out of a rebate once and that was because the post office didn't put a clear postmark on the envelope, so that was an easy out for Seagate to not send me my $40. There's no way I can prove that I did mail it on time, so that's it. That sort of shenanigans is why I don't bother much with rebates anymore. Since then, the stores I've bought from offered instant rebates, applied at the checkout. I ignore everything else because I don't like wasting my time filling out paperwork that I shouldn't have to mail. Given that OfficeMax says it's their #1 complaint, I can imagine that I'm not alone in this. I'd be glad to switch brands or what store I go to if I get a sense that they are trying to screw me over.

    13. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by 0xC2 · · Score: 1

      Tried to obtain a rebate on my Sidekick II with a TMobile activation. Followed instructions exactly, made my own copies. Wait months. Rebate center claims never to receive application. Call rebate center, reply is F*CK YOU VERY MUCH, LOSER. Call TMobile. They say they can't take action until the Rebate Center rejects my application, so send application again (you did make a copy, didn't you?) with photocopy of the UPC. They will reject, then call us back. Resend application. Wait months. Rebate Center rejects application. Call TMobile. "Sorry, we can't do anything. Try talking to Rebate Center."

      Never received a rebate. Turned off for life from rebates.

      --
      Be heard || Be herd
    14. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1
      They aren't a scam at all
      Your post is entirely correct, including the above quote. However, there are a number of dishonest companies online that use rebates to scam their customers. Most B&M companies have worked diligently to make rebates more palatable to customers, but some of the .coms will concoct all sorts of crap to avoid paying.
    15. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by keytohwy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Consumers have become victims of their own avarice behavior and this exemplifies it. Everyone bitches about the bad service at xyz retailer, yet they'd throw that retailer under a bus in 2 seconds to save $1 at abc retailer. Consumers have squeezed margins out of (especially) brick and mortar businesses to the point where those businesses have to find different ways of maintaining margins, and offering a competitive price, lest the customers go elsewhere. As for the poster complaining about having to work with anonymous sources, I hope they don't live in a glass house. You bought the monitor ANONYMOUSLY, online. Imagine, just for a second, that you are a loyal customer, and you typically buy your goods from the same vendor, maybe even the same sales person. Nothing anonymous, just two people doing business. Now if you have a problem, you've got a relationship with a person you can contact to help you resolve your issue. No, your right, it's much better to save that $20, and give you a reason to bring your issues here.

    16. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by epee1221 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've never had unnecessary difficulty getting a rebate. Having gotten the rebate run-around too many times, my family no longer shops at Best Buy.

      --
      "The use-mention distinction" is not "enforced here."
    17. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Buran · · Score: 1

      You did keep copies, and therefore sent them a complaint letter, complained to the BBB, and filed a small claims lawsuit, right?

    18. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

      My mother in law took a different approach. After previous bad experiences, she expected the "haven't received" excuse, so she scanned in the barcode, full receipt, and rebate form before sending them. When (surprise surprise) a phone call confirmed that they "hadn't received" her initial mailing, she said, "That's ok, I'll send in the copies I made with a note that you lost the first attempt."

      It's interesting how many mail-in rebates fail to arrive...

    19. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by BishopBerkeley · · Score: 1

      No, it's not entirely a scam. The companies that process these rebates have gotten much better at organizing the process. One can now check the status of the rebate online. For example, I bought a refurbished laser printer for $90 in January, and I sent in the rebate form for my $20. In April, I checked the status, and I found out that it had been rejected because THEY had made a mistake. So, I read their rules, and I noticed that I had recourse. So, I sent in my form again.

      Low and behold, they approved it! Not for $20, but for $50! So, my $90 printer (which works GREAT!) finally cost me a mere $40 (including tax, delivery, and all).

      So, maybe it's not a scam. Maybe it's incompetence on their part. They have to make up for mistakes that favor people like me by screwing others?

      --
      "...who search the reason of things
      Are those who bring the most sorrow on themselves." --Euripides, The Medea
    20. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by grapeape · · Score: 1

      I too avoid rebates at all costs. The two worst offenders in my area are CompUSA and Office Depot, followed slightly by MicroCenter. CompUSA is so bad about them that I have refused to step foot in there after the Black Friday sale last year. I stood in line 3 hours to save what I thought was $50 over what the others were charging on a high end video card. When I finally got in the store they had run out of the cards and according to the sales person only had 4 per store to start with, worse yet the price was actually around $30 higher than everywhere else but with a $75 rebate. There was nothing mentioned about it in the flyer, only a small asterisk which wasnt spelled out anywhere on the paper. After that I left the other things I was planning to buy in the cart and went to Best Buy.

    21. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by humphrm · · Score: 1

      If by "You bought the monitor ANONYMOUSLY" you mean I gave them my name, shipping and billing address, and credit card number, then yes, I guess it was anonymous. But the CSR I called to resolve the issue certainly did not give me ONE of those pieces of information about her or her company.

      --
      -- "In order to have power, I must be taken seriously." -Mojo Jojo
    22. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by himurabattousai · · Score: 1
      Best Buy, Circuit City, et al borrow the difference between the retail and rebate prices and make extra money off it. Then, they hand off the processing of the rebate to a third party without saying so, and never disclose how to contact that third party. All the "mail within 48 hours and include UPC's and receipts and give us your firstborn child" are insisted on by that third party rebate company to prevent the customer from actually claiming the rebate, probably because it's better for their bottom line to have to shell out the money. Even when the rebate company screws up, it's never their fault, no matter how well the customer complies with their demands.

      In any other context, this would be a scam. What's worst about it is that the rebate company requires original barcodes and whatnot, without which, the product is not returnable. (The only place I've ever seen that takes returns without proof of purchase is Jewel-Osco, a subsidary of Albertson's food stores. Too bad they don't sell video cards..........)

      --
      "osake no hou ga, biiru yori ii" to omotteiru.
    23. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called a scam, sam. Why would a store want to invest in all the extra overhead of running a rebate return program when, as common sense might tell you, it would be more cost effective for them to just give you the sale price at the register?

      Perhaps by some strange miracle, the rebate program actually represents profit for the store? Of course it does, and judging by the popularity of rebate programs, it is quite a significant profit.

      If they really intended to give you the sale price, of course, they would give it to you at the register. Guess what? They never intended to give you the sale price in the first place: that's why the rebate program exists.

    24. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by loraksus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tiger Direct, $50 rebate

      Well, there's your problem right there.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    25. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1

      That's SOP for Black Friday. Every store has a few huge loss leaders, but you have to be there well before opening if you want to get them. I checked out BF a couple times, just to see what it's like. Bottom line: it's for stay-at-home moms that love shopping. Anyone else would be better off to just put in a couple extra hours at work and hit up a sane sale a couple weeks later.

    26. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might have better luck at CompUSA now. They were nailed with an FTC order because of just such abuses, and had to implement a streamlined rebate procedure. You just go to their website, type in a number from your purchase receipt, and it's automatic from there; no forms to fill out, no clipping of UPCs, nothing to mail. Of course, "Allow 6-8 weeks for processing" still means you get your check in 7 weeks and 6 days, but you get it.

      I believe one or two of the other big-box retailers got the same order.

      rj

    27. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by gingerfire · · Score: 1

      Agreed -- I think I've received about half the rebate checks I was due for one reason or another. Then, let's not forget how quickly they must be cashed.

    28. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've missed an obvious fact.

      The largest cost to a manufacturer with a rebate progam is the cost of cutting and mailing checks. The data entry costs, data processing, envelope printing, postal rates, and customer support to handle complaints (enormous expense right there). This will more than nullify any interest gained by temporarily holding the money for 6-16 months.

    29. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by keytohwy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, it's a vicious cycle. The customer wants a better price, so they are disloyal, or whatever term we want to attach to it. To stay competitive, the retailer lowers the price, but that comes at a cost. Since the product is a tangible item, and cost really cannot be negotiated by the retailer, they cut in other areas, namely staff. When you think about what the average /.'er knows about tech...would you work for $9.50/hour with little benefits, weekends, and in a retail environment? Nope, probably not. So now the retailer has a substandard workforce, because, after all, the customer wants a lower price, and then the very customer gets pissed by the lack of service and still goes elsewhere. The retailer retaliates by lowering prices as an enticement, maybe even via rebate, to keep customers, and things just keep getting worse. Whether you like it or not, consumers are greedy. These companies have never told you they were a non-profit, right? Not saying that some companies, or more specifically, some people in those companies are greedy, but I think they are outweighed my the me-society that America has been so great at breeding. And for clarification, I did not mean anonymous in the sense of name and ones particulars, but rather that good old fashioned human interaction that tends to break down barriers and helps solve problems.

    30. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh. 6-16 WEEKS.

    31. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by abertoll · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's blantantly obvious that they have no intention of sending you the rebate. I used to do rebates all the time, and I was about 50/50 on whether or not I'd have trouble with various companies. It doesn't bother me when there's a mistake, and the company sends the rebate after you provide your records, but a lot of them purposefully ignore you, ask you to submit papers and THEN ignore you, or ask you to submit your papers and then don't provide you with the correct amount on the rebate. And keep in mind this is after 8 or more months go by in most cases.

      I even saw one rebate that claimed that "unresolved rebates" were invalid after 8 months. So they can just deny receiving it, stretch it out, make you wait, and then say it's invalid.

      Some companies are good (hint: Staples is the BEST), but some of them are out to scam you (hint: eCost.com is one of the WORST). And I think some of them, whether through their own dept or a third party rebate-handler, pretty much just accept the first X number of rebates, and then make it extremely difficult for anything over X that they get. I mean after all, what are you going to do? Sue them over $20?

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    32. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by abertoll · · Score: 1

      I remember reading somewhere that it isn't legal for them to give something like 3 days to submit the rebate. I think the minimum is something like 7 or 10 days. Yeah, I know I've been burned by that too, which is why I always check the terms now.

      Here's another thing to think about for those of you who pay bills by check:

      How many times was your payment ever "lost in the mail" or do they say they didn't get it? Now compare that to how many times you've heard "we haven't received that rebate." Yeah I guess the post office just has something against delivering my rebate mail, but none of my other mail. Even if they say "we lost it," at best they just don't care about their customers when it comes to losing a few bucks.

      Same thing goes with your "unable to find the rebate" example. I suspect some companies do it on purpose, but even if they don't, how careless are they with the OTHER parts of their site? You know the parts where they make money?

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    33. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by abertoll · · Score: 1

      From my experience:


      - percentage of rebate submissions initially rejected (guessing 40%)

      60%


      - percentage of rejected submissions where the consumer received notice of rejection (guessing 0%)

      Depends. I never actually received a notification, but often there is a site I can check to see the status.


      - percentage of initial rejections that were followed up by a resubmission from the customer, in time (guessing 10%)

      In time? If it's my fault, I usually don't have time, and I let it go--it's MY fault. But being meticulous, it's only been my fault once... in that case I have a nice year of waiting to look forward to ;)


      - percentage of resubmissions that were not fulfilled for any reason (guessing 20%)

      50%


      - percentage of submitted rebates that resulted in a check (guessing 60%)

      40%

      Again, just my experience...

      This is why I don't do rebates anymore unless it's with a company that I've discovered is honest about it. I have no problem with the terms of rebates (I always read them first), or with companies trying to count on customers neglecting to submit them in time, but when more people are forthcoming than they estimated, I think they should just take the hit.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    34. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by bobcote · · Score: 1

      In the same way that a refund from the IRS is a present. It's your money to begin with.

    35. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by bigwang · · Score: 1

      Are these all personal anecdotes? You must be the unluckiest person in the world. Frank Grimes unlucky. I've only had one rebate be invalid. And it was because there were two seperate rebates for a single product. And I sent a copy of the UPC to the one that needed an original. The terms were a little ambiguous, but that's still only one rebate out of dozens I have done succesfully. If people read the fine print, and are organized (copy EVERYTHING. keep notes of what you sent where, and when you sent it) and are patient, then rebates are a great way to save money. I worry that OfficeMax will stop doing free-after-rebate items now that the mail-in-rebates are instant-rebates.

    36. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by quonsar · · Score: 1

      jump up and down on one leg and make chicken noises, and we'll give you this piece of shit for $50 less.

      BEGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWK!

    37. Re: I wouldn't call it a scam by gidds · · Score: 1
      In many cases, the HUMONGOUS BIG FONT price on the item is the price after the rebate -- not what you actually have to pay to the cashier.

      Yeah, this is off-topic, but isn't that the way things are usually priced in the USA? Here in the UK, the price you show most prominently must be the one inclusive of VAT; it was a nasty shock when I visited the USA and found the cashier asking more than I expected, due to the sales tax.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    38. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is ol' Grimey?

    39. Re:I wouldn't call it a scam by macwhiz · · Score: 1
      In many cases, the HUMONGOUS BIG FONT price on the item is the price after the rebate -- not what you actually have to pay to the cashier. This is illegal in some states (as it should be), but when it's not, the retailers love to do it.

      Connecticut has it very right on this one.

      In Connecticut, you cannot "do the math" for the consumer in your advertisement. If you have a rebate, it must be advertised using smaller type than the price the consumer will pay in the store, and you cannot advertise a price "after rebate."

      If you do advertise a "price after rebate" in Connecticut, you must sell the product to the customer at that price, before rebate.

      Amazon.com put a flyer in the Hartford, CT paper a few years ago with price-after-rebate items. Of course, they didn't offer up the correct price when I visited their site. I contacted customer support and it took them several days to reply... saying that I could email customer support to order those items at the legally-required price. I never saw another newspaper insert from them again while I lived in CT.

      I wonder if companies are choosing to stop using rebates in part because of the costs and risks associated with their ads. If you have to make seperate ads for Connecticut and a few other states, and make sure you never send the wrong PDF to the wrong state for printing... That's a lot of risk for small reward.

      I wish New York would adopt this sort of rebate-pricing law.

  4. Thank god ... by fkx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How stupid does a company have to be to devise a marketing practice that almost every customer who tries, hates and then continue to use it for what, decades?

    Hello, Staples, Best Buy, etc .. are you paying any attention?

    1. Re:Thank god ... by nolife · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of the many reasons that I really really can't stand Bestbuy and go out of my way to avoid buying something from them was the rebates, like I said though, that is only one of the reasons.
      I did notice in the last month or so, they seem to have scaled back on the amount of rebates. Typically, 90% of the weekly sales items were infested with rebates. That number has gone down. Maybe it was a test?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:Thank god ... by 0racle · · Score: 2, Informative

      It worked. Despite what you say about how hated they were, they made companies money. The real question is how stupid does a company have to be to stop using it?

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    3. Re:Thank god ... by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      How stupid does a company have to be to devise a marketing practice that almost every customer who tries, hates and then continue to use it for what, decades?

      Stupid? Are you kidding, it was brilliant! They want to hold onto their money as long as possible, but at the same time want to offer the customer a price they can't refuse. So they offer a rebate; they get to keep their money in the bank for up to three months while the customer tries in vain to send in the rebate information and get their few dollars back. In the meantime the company gets to pad their profit report with the money they've raked in, and given that so many people don't even send in the rebate or send it in but don't qualify to get it back, the company gets to hold on to more cash.

      Hooray for OfficeMax, to break the cycle and force companies to play fair.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    4. Re:Thank god ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about storewide, but in the computer department Best Buy has dropped mail in rebates completely. Im typing this on a laptop i bought there for 600 dollars, all instant rebates.

    5. Re:Thank god ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not necessarily with the box stores on mail-in rebates, but sometimes with the company that makes the product being sold. HP comes to mind as the worst example of this. They don't allow the box stores like Staples, Best Buy, et al to convert those mail-in rebates into instant ones. They insist on the mail-in rebates because not everyone will send them off, and thus HP ends up with a slightly higher margin on those items.

      For reference, I work at such a box store and deal with HP's crappy mail-in rebate policy every day. I don't blame customers one bit for hating mail-in rebates, but the fault does not always lie with the store.

    6. Re:Thank god ... by Buran · · Score: 1

      That only works if people are stupid enough to fall for it. Since people are no longer willing to fall for it (just look, rebate complaints were the #1 complaint for OfficeMax!), they are stupid to continue using rebates, since that is driving customers away to competitors who don't use such tactics.

      So the original comment stands.

    7. Re:Thank god ... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      It's one thing if the complaints about rebates are about companies that supposedly never received the rebate request, or that find some minor technicality on which to deny the rebate or whatever, but I think a lot of it simply has to do with the hassle. Lots of consumers buy stuff with rebate offers fully expecting to redeem the rebate, but then put it off until the rebates expire, or they lose the required documentation or whatever. I'm just as capable of such laziness or carelessness as everyone else and admit I've failed to take advantage of rebates because of it (which of course is what the companies count on), but that's not the companies' fault.

      I think it sucks because I frequently do get the rebates done, and while I'm sure some of the "horror stories" about rebate fraud are true, I personally haven't ever had one fail; the closest I've ever come was waiting far longer than necessary for a rebate on a modem I bought once, but I did at least eventually receive it.

      I know I'm in the minority here, but I'm not looking forward to the end of rebates. Often they're far more substantial than any savings that could ever be offered through sale prices or whatever; the fact so many people never claim them means they can offer huge rebates that entice more people to buy, and those people who actually do bother to jump through the hoops do in fact wind up getting some pretty sweet deals. With the rebates gone, it doesn't mean we'll suddenly start seeing all those rebates suddenly turned into instant, at-the-register price cuts; it just means we won't have as many opportunities to save as much money on the purchases, period. As someone who frequently does go to the trouble of going through the rebate process and enjoys the rewards of doing so, I'm disappointed one or more retailers are going to stop offering me rebate opportunities because other people are too lazy to take advantage of them and make a point of complaining that companies "unfairly" entice them into purchases with rebates they wind up not taking advantage of.

      Oh, well.

    8. Re:Thank god ... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Actually, Staples easy rebates are really good, and compusa has shaped up a fair bit after that whole ftc thing they went through a while back.
      Best Buy? Still gives out freaking gift cards instead of cheques and they are about as reliable as TigerDirect in terms of rebates. Not saying that you won't get a rebate cheque from them, but you probably will have to call several times...

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    9. Re:Thank god ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bugged me about the Best Buy rebates was that the computer *KNEW* about them. How else could it spit out 300 feet of rebate coupons at the register? This is typical CYA middle managment crap that happens at any company. Everyone knows that that the process sucks but no one will do anything about it except tweak it. The tweak? You do not have to go to a huge board of paper to find the rebates (which were always gone).

      I am sure the low level people in the company hate dealing with this junk to. Would you like to be a manager that has to walk over and explain for the 500th time today yes that is the price before the rebate. No the ad clearly states here in 4pt font what the real price is.

    10. Re:Thank god ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is not the switcherooy that is going on, and that does happen. It is the problem that the computer knows that the rebate is there and just doesnt do it right then and there. So you end up paying taxes on 700 dollars worth of computer stuff for a computer that costs you 250. So you end up basically giving the goverment 30 bucks they should not get. Good luck getting that money back btw. For example if you buy one of those CD stacks for 50 bucks and the rebate is 49.99. You should pay taxes on 1 cent. Yet you pay taxes on 50. You are buying something for 1 cent. Even though the comapny is stupid for doing so.

      Also if you look at the adverts it is almost ALWAYS with the rebate. They then advertise it as a sale. Then in the fine print its not a sale.

      I also think everything should already have the tax applied. No more of this 99.99 crap then it ends up being 106.98. Not having the tax applied beforhand is just a way of hiding the real price of something.

      Boo hoo hoo your not going to get stuff for free anymore. I am so sad for you. Did you honestly think the 90's way of thinking would work? 1) Give your main product away 2)... 3) Profit. It does not work. There will still be deals out there. Trust me. That one less place is willing to run with a loss leader just shows what sort of busness plan it is...

  5. ?So What by Kildjean · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How is this even cosmically, universally, and bullshitally news for nerds? TAAAAAAAAACOOOOOOO!!!!!! c'mon man... next thing we are going to see is that pink hello kitty panties are selling for a dollar in dollar for less...

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:?So What by fkx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Where? PALOSTFU

  6. slow news... by rickliner · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Better to .sig than to .sag
    1. Re:slow news... by kratei · · Score: 1

      Actually that story was also slow news . . . http://officemax.mediaroom.com/index.php/press_rel eases/47 . . . since it looks like the OfficeMax press release was back on May 26th.

    2. Re:slow news... by keyne9 · · Score: 1

      Such an incredibly significant amount of time has passed.

    3. Re:slow news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might have been news????

      It is news, just because we got it a little later then those who read that site doesn't disqualify it as news. This is great news as many of us will actually go into an Office Max to see what they have due to this happening.

      I would never had known this if it had not reached /. a few days late. So for me this news is on time. It is not like this was a near earth object predicted to graze our atmosphere and we learned about the prediction a day after it happened. Or a story about the Broadcast Flag being voted in on tuesday but we received word about the vote on the friday after. This is a news story that was not that time sensitive, so therefore it could have been a month late and I would still find this to be current news worthy.

    4. Re:slow news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might have been news, sort of, back on June 30...
      Maybe it's stuff that matters...

    5. Re:slow news... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please allow 6-8 weeks for rebate stories to be processed.

    6. Re:slow news... by donarb · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this press release has expired, your news rebate cannot not be redeemed.

  7. Horray! by bblazer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think that this is huge step in the right direction. It makes the cost after rebate a real cost, simplifies the process, and will go a long way towards customer satisfaction. I know that if OM has the same merchandise as a competing store, and I get the rebate at the register, I am going there. One more thing, if the rebate is instant, it will stop problems with rebates that are based on purchases of items in certain combinations. "I am sorry sir, but this rebate only applies if you buy x and y. Would you like to get y as well?"

    --
    My .bashrc can beat up your .bashrc!
    1. Re:Horray! by photojunkie · · Score: 1

      Will we see a rise in the 'combo' rebate structure then? Perhaps, and I'm not terribly bothered by it as long as Y is something generaly relevent and useful.

  8. Wierd by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the way the prices are labeled, it can get confusing about it being 'after mail-in rebate'. This happed to me at Staples. Thought that the price was 29.99, it was 39,99 at the register. You had to look carefully enough at the print at the bottom.

    The other beef with stores is that the register tape is so damned long? Why is it over a foot long when I bought a pen for 3$?
    Grumble. Way to save the environment.

    Shagz

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:Wierd by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      haha.. yea.. but thats a recycled paper receipt :D

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    2. Re:Wierd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you get confused by Staples sale signs, I would have to question your intelligence. It's in the same size print as the regular price. It says "You pay 39.99" then below that in the exact same size it says "Final cost 29.99 after Easy Rebate"

  9. As an ignorant foreigner by binkzz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a country where rebates aren't found in the wild: Why is it hated so much? I can understand the inconvenience, but it seems I'm missing something.

    --
    'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    1. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by fkx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You obviously have never tried to actually obtain a rebate.

      You have to jump through hoops to comply with their paperwork requirements especially in terms of originals, copies and backups (you have to mail in the paperwork you might need later for a warranty issue)

      You wait an incredible amount of time for a response.

      Half the time the response turns out to be "You failed to comply with the paperwork requirements properly, no rebate for you" in english so broken you just know they didn't recognize what you sent and of course because it was the original, there is no way to send them another.

      It is just pure unadulterated infuriating bullshit.

    2. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by IdleTime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. You will make more in interest by putting the rebate money in a savings account
      2. You provide the company with verified name, address, phone number etc that they sell to other spam companies.
      3. If they REALLY wanted to give you the rebate they would deduct it in the store. With mail-in they know that only a subset of the customers will actually ever receive the rebate, money saved.

      I can come up with more, but those are the 3 main ones for me.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    3. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by grim4593 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Paperwork requirements? All you have to do is throw the UPC and the rebate receipt into an envolope and mail it on its way. The only complaint I have is that it takes forever to get your money in the mail.

    4. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The companies that handle the rebates for the store and/or product manufactor, has a vested interest in making it as hard as possible to actually get your rebate back. The less they send back, the more they and the company making the product make.
      Every bad experience someone has with rebates is because of that as the rebate concept is litered with corruption.
      At least 50% of the rebates I have sent in have been rejected by the processing company for one reason or another, incomplete data, some mysterious condition was not met like they recieved it late, they could not read my receipt, etc.. I had a rebate for some software rejected because the company claimed the rebate was only valid in the US and Hawaii was not in the US! When I called to complain, I was told there was nothing they can do because that rebate offer expired. Often times you call the number (if they have one), and you will hear some bogus reason and they need a copy of everything you sent to them faxed in. Suddenly you qualify this time now you just have to wait another 8-12 weeks for that check that is in an envelope that looks like junk mail (which you may throw away) and the check expires in like 14 days.

      Rebate can work but the current system is abused too much that consumers are getting screwed.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It gets ridiculous and difficult to comparison shop without a notepad, thanks to every retailer having multiple rebates that occur in multiple ways. Say you want to buy a PC.

      Retailer #1: $499 with $50 in-store rebate, $200 manufacturer's mail-in rebate (paperwork available only from manufacturer), $20 store mail-in rebate, and an additional $75 mail-in rebate if you use this PC to join AOL (rebate only available after you join, contact AOL for details). In order to get the full set of rebates, you will need to make and mail three copies of your receipt, after following up directly with the manufacturer to get their forms, then join AOL and once their paperwork arrives, try to get their customer service operator to understand what promotion you're referring to.

      Retailer #2: $399 with $100 mail-in rebate and $100 bonus mail-in rebate if you also buy a PowerSurge[TM] surge protector. In order to get the full set of rebates, you will need to make and mail two copies of your reciept and buy a surge protector whether you need one or not.

      Retailer #3: $449 with $75 in-store rebate, $10 instant manufacturer's rebate, $10 repeat buyer rebate for return customers, $150 online rebate from customer survey site (electronically credited only), and $25.99 mail-in rebate for new customers only. In order to maximize rebates, you will need to fill out an extensive survey on a consumer research website, giving away your personal details and also your receipt # and your credit card # so that they can credit you, and you will theoretically either receive one party's rebate if you've never filled out a rebate for this manufacturer (or any of its subsidiaries) in the past or the other party's rebate if you are a repeat customer, but good luck trying to prove either when they say that their database doesn't confirm your status.

      This is not an exaggerated set of examples, every year in most "newer" (i.e. heavily suburban) US cities around "back to school" season and again during the winter holidays, virutally every advertisement you see is for "NEW HP PC! $FREE [after rebates]" and "NEW 8 Megapixel Canon Digital Camera! $0.00 [after rebates]" and "Sanyo Jumbo Microwave Oven! $1.00 [after rebates]" and so on. Every mailer that comes around is full of "$0" products, but the problem is, given an entire marketplace full of "deals" like those listed above, how do you know which one is actually the better deal, or more importantly, the better deal for you? As you might expect, the number of people who ultimately do pay $0 is very small, if not nonexistent... and in the meantime, everyone scrambles to jump through hoopes in order to get back what they can after arriving at the store and paying the real price of $399, $449, or $499, on many occasions unknown or unclear until you actually arrive at the retail establishment.

      More often than not, it ends up not being worth the time spent calculating and (afterward) filling out and mailing paperwork to get the rebates. Compound this problem with the fact that something like 50 percent of rebates experience difficulty (read: scam) at which time they tell you that you're not "eligible" or you've sent a bad photocopy of your receipt, or you purchased a day before the promotion began, or a day after it ended, or they suspect you of rebate fraud (buying and processing rebates, then re-selling the items on eBay at near full price)... and it becomes a giant farce.

      Rebates are, in short, a way for stores and manufacturers to obfuscate real pricing, sell "tie-in" goods, and get your personal information for consumer research purposes at no cost to them, often while being able to duck responsibility even for producing the rebates that they've promised.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    6. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by honkycat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Honestly, I don't understand the hatred that people have for these things. I have probably sent in rebates for 5-10 products per year for the last few years and every single one has been issued in a timely fashion. People claim that their submissions are ignored or denied because they failed to comply with the requirements, but that doesn't match my experience at all. I do have very neat handwriting, which I'm sure doesn't hurt. I used to painstakingly photocopy all the materials I sent and keep them in case there was a problem, but it came to seem pointless so now I only do that for higher value ones if at all.

      That said, I'd be happy to see them done away with. They are inconvenient, especially for the lower value ones (I don't mind 10 minutes of paperwork for $50, but when it's for $10 or less, it seems kind of silly). An in-store rebate is much nicer for the customer.

    7. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Fozzyuw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mail-in Rebates are hated because it's one step removed from a scam. They're used and marketed to consumers to make them believe that the price of a product is actaully cheaper than what you will really pay for. It often causes confusion in the shopper which can increase their likely hood of purchasing on impulse. Sure, maybe you didn't want or need that 100 stack of blank CD/DVD's but if it's labeled with huge black letters on yellow poster cards for $4 (normally $40), you just might pick one up.

      The three "scam like" parts is that, first, most rebates often have a very very short life span. It's like trying to launch a space shuttle. High winds, rain, or a cat farts and you'll miss your change to get back that $36.

      Second, is stores 'use' to market products without notification that the price being presented was AFTER rebate. Sometimes multiple rebates are on a products and some are taken at the register and some are mail-in. And lets be clear, it's the mail-in ones that are the problem. After purchasing my new car and getting over $4,000 in rebates and incentives, I didn't have to do a single thing for paper work to get discounts.

      Finally, Stores know that consumers do not always send in the rebates. I just read an article somewhere, I can't remember where, but if someone can help post a link, I'd appreciate it, it showed that if rebates where around $100-$200, it would have a 50% return rate. Rebates for $35 would have around 24% return rate, and rebates of $10

      Of course, this is a business world and rebates where never ment to give the consumer a discount. Their purpose, like all things, is to get more consumers into your store and buy more stuff (if they need it or not). Or sometimes stores will make agreements with companies that if their stock is too large and too slow selling they can apply massive rebates to move said stock. This shows that companies use small rebates to attract people into the store and to sell them things they might not necessarly want, because of impulse price/purchasing.

      The best advice is when you get your rebate form, the first thing you do when you get home is to process the rebate right away. Take out the reciets, read the rebate requirements, fill out the envelope, add the paperwork you need, and mail it in the same day. Of course, problems might happen if you purchase something on impulse and never use it due to 'waiting' to see if want to keep it or not (maybe it's a gift for a birthday a few weeks away.). This is when problems arrise. Now, you might have lost the reciept, or the rebate has expired. It also takes literrally 14-20 weeks to see a rebate. Most consumers want to buy a products to save money NOW. Not get a check when the snow's melted/arrived.

      So, that is a simple, but probably badly explained, example of why Rebate are hated. 1) they often have very short turn over time 2) because they're (still) marketed (with small print) to appear as the register price, but are not 3) They're specifically marketed to and used by stores with the fact that consumers don't like to use them given a specific price point. Just recently, I bought a box of cereal for $2.00 on sale and could have gotten a $2.00 rebate for the same box. I never sent it in, because $2.00 wasn't worth the effort for me. Did I buy the cereal for the rebate? No, it's normally $3.50 and a delicous 'healthy' cereal of brand flacks and yogurt. I suspect that the $2.00 rebate is used less than 5% of the time. It probably costed more to design and print the rebate forms than the cost of all the rebates given.

      I'm starting to ramble. I better go.
      Cheers, Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    8. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, I don't understand the hatred that people have for these things.

      It just feels sneaky. Not even counting the rebates that you fail to get back for one reason or another, but why should I, an individual, loan a billion dollar company $50 for a couple of months? So that they can gain the aggregate interest on $50 x 10,000? Screw that.
      Just sell me the item, and lose the rebate.

    9. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      I'm sure this has already been answered, but the answer is because people are lazy/forgetful. They buy the product thinking they're getting it at the after-rebate price, but then never send in the rebate form. Then they kick themselves for paying full price for something that they could easily have bought at a slightly better price (with no rebate) with a small amount of effort.

      As for the rebate processing centers, there are a handful that are notorious for "losing" rebates, or for suddenly scattering the contents of an envelope immediately upon opening it so that they can then claim that all the required parts weren't received. Of all the rebates I've done, the only one I ever had a problem with was, ironically enough, OfficeMax. After many calls and about an hour on the phone with them, I did eventually get it sorted out. And even better than that, they sent me two rebate checks! My $40 dvd burner with a $30 rebate suddenly turned into them giving me a dvd burner AND 20 bucks! Not bad, but it was still a PITA.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    10. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by barzok · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that (in most US States), the state, county and sometimes city profits from rebates too. Example:

      $50 purchase price with 3% states tax and 4% county sales tax. $1.50 revenue for the state, $2 revenue for the county, $53.50 total bill for the consumer.

      $100 purchase price, $50 rebate: $107 bill for the customer. $3 revenue for the state, $4 revenue for the county, $50 rebate for the customer - final cost to the customer $57.39 (including postage). Plus whatever interest the company earns on that $50 during the 3 months it takes to "proces" the rebate.

      These 2 deals "appear" to be equivalent, at first glance - $100, with a $50 rebate vs. $50 straight up. In fact the rebate costs you nearly $4 more than a straight-up $50 purchase.

    11. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Oh, I understand your point completely, and do agree that it is kind of silly. I just think it's kind of odd that people hate them as passionately as they do. I'm no stranger to passionate hatred of stupidity, but rebates don't quite rise to that level for me.

    12. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your experience has been better than most. Not all rebate centers are the same, and maybe you're buying from companies that use the decent ones. I do know that for awhile there, it seemed like rebate centers would automatically reject some percentage of rebates and force the customer to come up with supporting documentation no matter what. I know I've had to do it a bunch of times, and it's a bitch. There was also a case of a rebate for a monitor stating it needed to be 'hand-written in blue ink' buried in the fine print. That sure didn't win any fans and resulted in a lawsuit.

    13. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by B5_geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will give you an example of what I have found.
      I was out buying a new office chair, and I saw a 'sale-bin' of 100 spindle DVDR's with a BIG price next to them that said: 100 pack Maxell DVDR $4.99 and in very tiny print under that on a different sign: $24.99 before rebates, $20.00 mail-in rebate.

      The second sign was very hard to see and not obvious that it was with the DVD's for $4.99.

      I brought my 4 spindles + chair to the register, the total cost was almost $100.00 MORE then it should have been. I mentioned that they used the wrong price for the DVD's, and they said, "No Sir, that is the correct price." I made a fuss, the manager came out, showed me the sign.

      I told them what I thought of their false advertising tatics, and threatened to NOT buy the $400 chair, if I didn't get the disks for the Posted $4.99.

      They didn't care, ...blah blah...company policy ...blah blah...

      So, I left that store empty handed and have never returned.

      My point; too many times they post the "After Rebate" price, over/above and bigger then the actual price. It is deceptive. Too many online retailers are doing this too. Sony DVDRW-DL $25.00* you only see the Actual Price in the checkout.

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    14. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by llefler · · Score: 1

      Some require a UPC, some accept a photocopy of the UPC. Particularly when there are multiple rebates on an item. I've seen items have 4 separate rebates on a single sale.

      Some want the original sales receipt (although this is rare now). If you order online, many aren't clear whether they accept the confirmation from the website, the one you receive in e-mail, or the packing slip that comes with the product.

      I have seen rebates with very short periods for mailing the rebate. One online retailer (that I no longer do business with) has a 14 calendar day period on filing the rebate, and then takes 10 days to get the product to you. It's arrogant to expect a customer to immediately take care of rebate paperwork based on their delivery schedule, and then turn around and give themselves 8-12 weeks to process the rebate. Particularly when they are quite often late sending your check.

      Any failure by the customer, retailer, or rebate processing center penalizes the customer.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
    15. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 1
      1. You will make more in interest by putting the rebate money in a savings account
      Really? You can make a 100% ROI in 3 to 6 months? Which bank do you use???
    16. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Buran · · Score: 1

      company claimed the rebate was only valid in the US and Hawaii was not in the US! When I called to complain, I was told there was nothing they can do because that rebate offer expired.

      That is what the state attorney general, the Better Business Bureau, planetfeedback.com, and small claims court are for. They illegally failed to hold up to their end of the contract, which means they are liable for their incompetence.

    17. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Buran · · Score: 1

      Or you could just do what I am doing -- build your own box from parts and choose them based on reputation, user feedback, pre-rebate price, and your other needs. A box I'm building in a wishlist on newegg.com has a couple of mail-in rebates included, and if they're still active when I buy the system, I'll send them in -- but fortunately, newegg displays the pre-rebate price clearly labelled along with the post-rebate price, which is clearly labeled as "mail-in" or instant.

    18. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by line72 · · Score: 1

      I just got a rebate check in the mail last week. When it showed up I had no clue what it was for. It turns out that it was for an external harddrive I had purchased at CompUSA a year and a half ago! The rebate check even showed that that I had filed for the rebate on 10/14/04, and the check was dated for 06/27/06! It took them a year and a half to send me my money which I had long forgotten about !

    19. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Hell, 3 to 6 months is way too long. I want my 100% yield in 8 to 12 weeks! And yes, I'd be very interested to know which bank is paying out rates like this...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    20. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's what really sucks aside from the hassle and deceptive pricing: If I buy something for my company with a rebate, I have to fill out an expense form and get reimbursed for the price AFTER the rebate because the rebate check will come to me. So the rebate money comes out of MY pocket until the I get the rebate check. And if something screws up with the rebate, I'm screwed.

      I usually go to Comp USA for computer stuff for our office, but I will definitely be heading to Office Max whenever possible from now on.

      -paul

    21. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by EXMSFT · · Score: 1

      BestBuy rebates routinely ask for more - and routinely get bounced, as the previous poster stated. I've had rebates that were PERFECTLY inline with the requirements get returned. Cingular screwed me in a similar manner after the AT&T Wireless acquisition when I had to buy new phones to keep my service. One rebate check was denied, one was never responded to. Rebates suck. And it isn't the consumer's fault.

    22. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Maybe so. I do actively try to avoid buying from companies that have a sleazy feel to them, even if it costs a little extra. However, I've done business with quite a few different companies of varying sizes. Maybe I've just been lucky, though I think I've done enough rebates that I'd have had at least one problem if it were really as endemic as it is made out to be.

      But, like I said, there's not much to actually like about these rebates, so I'd be glad to see them go, even if they work for me.

    23. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      With mail-in they know that only a subset of the customers will actually ever receive the rebate, money saved.

      That's fine. I won't buy anything that I wouldn't be willing to pay the "before rebate" price for, but for those of us who can spare 5 minutes to send in a rebate form we are given a bigger rebate precisely because of all of the other people who won't.

      I'm going to pull some numbers out of my ass, just to prove the point.

      Widget A costs $50 to manufacture, package and ship to a retail outlet. Retailer B sells item for 75$. Retailer C sells item for $90 with a $30 mail in rebate. If out of 100 buyers, only 40 will claim the rebate and retailer C will make $2800 in profit. While for 100 sales, retailer B will make $2500.

      It's cost shifting. Lazy people pay more. Just like people who don't shop around for the best price before a purchase.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    24. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I always shop at Newegg. They give you the real price, and then note the rebates you can have underneath in smaller print. That is a company practice that I respect, and will always shop there because of it.

      I also never understood the "in-store" rebate. Isn't that just the same, from the customers perspective, as a sale? Why even tell me it's a "rebate"?

    25. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Quite simply, massive fraud on the part of the clearing houses. They will decline your rebate, even if it completely valid. I had logitech do this to me - I sent in 2 rebates for 2 webcams at the same time - both had the same terms and conditions and I mailed both off at the same time. Unsurprisingly, one was rejected as being sent in too late and it took me 6 months to get that $20, even with the receipt from the postal service stating when it was sent in and the delivery confirmation.
      Also, woe be to the person who doesn't pay $4 to send a rebate in with delivery confirmation.

      Biggest problem is that there really hasn't been any punitive damages awarded against these companies. CompUSA got hit, but the vast majority of companies get away with these sort of practices, or receive minor fines that still allow them to clear a significant profit (i.e. you defrauded customers out of $90,000, we are going to fine you $10,000). I'd have no problem with a $100 fine, btw, if in the judgement was something like, "if we see you in court again, your fine will be multiplied by 100."

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    26. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, it could have been because of the whole false advertising thing.

    27. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by clayanderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed!

      The end of rebates means that prices will never be quite as low.

      Rebates work on a similar principal to credit cards. Those who play "by the rules" do better in the end. Case in point, credit card companies make very little money off of me because I never carry a balance. But they make a ridiculous amount of money off all the other folks who carry a balance each month.

      Similarly, rebates often offer a better deal than you'll ever get in-store, because they count on a certain percentage of people to fail to properly redeem the rebate. So they can advertise a lower price (and will honestly give it to you if you jump through a couple hoops), but don't have to actually deliver on that price to all customers. (And okay, so you lose a few cents on interest during the 4-6 week float. Whatever.)

      Yeah, it's a scheme, but for just a little extra work, it has saved me a whole lot of cash over the years.

    28. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The way rebates work is that you buy the item for the full price, then have to jump through a number of obstacles in order to actually get the rebate. These obstacles are deliberately designed to dissuade the customer from ever collecting their rebate.

      For example, a common scam/rebate offer is where you have to mail the company the original bar code from the package, but you have to mail it to two separate places. How do you do this? You can cut it in half (it can still be read with a bar code scanner), but many times the company will say, "This isn't the original bar code... this is half the bar code!"

      Another common scam is they require the originl reciept you recieve when you purchased the item. OK, no big deal, right? Except, if you purchase ten things, then send your original reciept to the company, and then suddenly discover that one of the things you purchased doesn't work, you can't take that item back to the store. Because... you don't have the original reciept.

      I read an expose' on the rebate scam a couple of years ago, and one of the interesting things they mentioned was that almost all rebates, no matter where the company is based (usually a large city), will issue their checks from a small bank in the Middle of Nowhere, USA. Why? Because some towns are so small that it takes mail a week to get to the location.

      Rebates are a win/win deal for the company. Most of the time, people buy something thinking, "What a great price!" but once they get home they can't be bothered to download and fill out all the paperwork. Thus, the company got you to buy their product over a competing brand, so that's a win. For those consumers who actually do go through the effort of filling out all the forms and mailing them in on time (most rebates have extremely short lifespans), the company can do what's called a float.

      What that means is, let's say you purchased a $1000 item with a $200 rebate. The company takes two months (no exaggeration: two months is the standard amount of time it takes if nothing goes wrong, and you'd be surprised how often things are "lost"). You initially have to pay the full price; the company keeps your $200 until all the paperwork is processed. If they put that money into even the most basic bank account, that's 5% interest over two months they can make off your money.

      So while you are getting $200 back, it's actually only costing the company $190.

      I'd love to meet the person who came up with these scams so I can kick him in the nuts. Hard.

    29. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Wait, are you implying that the job of marketing has fundamentally changed from "figuring out what people want" to "trying to trick people into buying stuff they don't want"? Shame on you.

    30. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Paperwork requirements? All you have to do is throw the UPC and the rebate receipt into an envolope and mail it on its way.

      I did that. I received a response saying I hadn't submitted the UPC. I still have the package with the UPC cut out of it. How do I prove otherwise? How much time and effort do I expend proving that they're lying?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    31. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by abertoll · · Score: 1

      Do you always buy them toward the beginning of the offer, and then do the rebates soon? See, because I know SOME people ALWAYS get their rebates. I have a theory that if you come in on the tail-end of the deal, you end up getting put into the "let's not give out any more rebates, guys" group.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
    32. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, but ... wow, a bank account that gives you 5% PER MONTH? sign me up for that one!

    33. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by honkycat · · Score: 1

      Interesting theory. I don't pay close attention to the dates, but I would probably be unlikely to purchase if I happened to notice the offer was just about to expire. Generally I send them in as soon as I'm sure I'm content enough with the product that I won't need an intact UPC code (to return it to the store). Actually, there have been a few times I've run up against the post-purchase deadline. In those cases, though, I always try to be conservative -- if they say it must be within 30 days of purchase, I presume that means calendar days (not business days) and I assume they run the clock so that if you purchased on the first of the month, you'd have to submit no later than the 30th to qualify. Normally, I wouldn't even push it, but I'd be sure to have it postmarked by the 30th, even though you could make a case that 30 days would mean the 31st...

    34. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      The mail-in rebate is $20. rather than paying those $20, you put them in the bank and in the time it takes for you to get the rebate mailed back to you, the interest will have increased your $20 rather than you losing interest on the $20. I have no idea what 100% you are talking about.

      Btw, USA is the only country I have been in which have mail-in rebates. In most countries it is illegal.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    35. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I live in the US, have sent in (and received) countless rebates, and I don't get it either. Most of the complaints seem to revolve around the offer expiring, being denied for improper info, etc. Sure, it's a minor pain, but if you follow directions, you get your rebate, period. When you get the check, look at it and see when it expires, then get to the bank in cash it on time. Really, its not that hard folks.

    36. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by zCyl · · Score: 1

      In addition to the reasons given by others, for some companies, rebates are essentially a scam. They subcontract rebate processing companies which are rewarded for rewarding the lowest percentage of rebates possible. So some of these companies fabricate false reasons for rejecting rebates, such as reporting the UPC symbol missing when it was present, reporting that only the original UPC symbol will be accepted and should be submitted (when it was submitted), reporting that the postage date was incorrect (when it was correct), and so forth. By doing this, they delay the giving of the rebate, and add to the hastle of receiving it. Each time they succeed in convincing someone not to keep trying to get the rebate, the company gets an extra $10 to $50.

      Some rebate processing companies seem to respond with randomized rejection reasons like this for a certain high percentage of legitimate rebates. But you don't need to take my word for it. Check a site with rebate discussions like fatwallet.

    37. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      1. It's a deceptive marketing practice - often the listed "price" is shown inclusive of some kind of "rebate". It is a lie, albeit one where the "fine print" covers things up.
      2. It's after-sale, so any taxes applied are based on a higher price.
      3. It's manipulative - there are often extra things which have to be done to get the rebate. Sometimes extra purchases must be made.
      4. It is, as you say, inconvenient. Anything that a vendor does to case the buyer unnecessary grief is not welcome.
      5. Part of the idea is to make sure that people don't ask for the rebate. This seems anti-competitive.
      Bravo to the end of "rebates"!
      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    38. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by grim4593 · · Score: 1

      Well I guess I have just been fortunate with my rebates.

    39. Re:As an ignorant foreigner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You will make more in interest by putting the rebate money in a savings account
      As you would if you applied the entire purchase price, too. Are you forced to buy these products?

      2. You provide the company with verified name, address, phone number etc that they sell to other spam companies.
      Ever pay by credit card? You're giving away the same information that way too. Sometimes, even more.

      3. If they REALLY wanted to give you the rebate they would deduct it in the store. With mail-in they know that only a subset of the customers will actually ever receive the rebate, money saved.
      With standard "On Sale" items, they know that only a subset of customers will buy them during the special sale period. The customers that don't pay attention to the timing, they'll still buy at the regular price (money made).

      I'm waiting for your other "reasons", seeing as how your "main ones" are so frivolous. You could have at least listed phone/internet purchase grievances and how they could undermine the process (required UPC# + delivery delays).

      +5 Insightful? That type of moderation used to mean something.

  10. Old News? by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ah, marketing at its finest. This isn't even really news. Most major retailers have been very quietly phasing out mail in rebates for months, if not years. It's in the freaking article, if you read it. People are saying " should do this too", and if you look, they probably already have.

    As it says, Best Buy did this over a year ago, they just don't have all the manufacturers on board yet. If you look in their computer department, most laptops have discontinued mail in rebates, and are either instant or normal price. Circuit City has the same thing, in almost the same way. Many of their home office electronics manufacturers are instant-rebate only now.

    If you read the article, it just states that "Beginning this Weekend" they'll start to phase the rebates out. It doesn't specify when they'll end, or exactly what will be phased out first. Best Buy made this exact same announcement in 2005.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm all for it, but people should try actually reading what's posted now and then. Then again, this is Slashdot, so what am I thinking?

    1. Re:Old News? by freakmn · · Score: 1

      I was pretty sure that this had already been done by Best Buy, so I searched for it, and it looks like that's been covered here, twice. Do you, or anyone else, know if they have actually stopped rebates? I avoid Best Buy, as my experience with them has been pretty poor, so I haven't been keeping up. I get the impression that they haven't eliminated them completely, as a quick search indicates that they still have a rebate center. If Best Buy hasn't kept up to their end of the deal, and nobody seems to mind, what incentive does Office Max have to stay the same?

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    2. Re:Old News? by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 1

      I used to work there. It's a phased withdrawl of rebates, just like Office Depot is probably doing. When they announced the incentive, Gateway instantly hopped onboard and all Gateway mail-in rebates disappeared. This allowed them to claim a "first step" toward the removal of rebates. As time has passed, they have discontinued more and more mailed rebates, but some remain. I suspect you will see the final removal near the end of their target time of 2 years. Rebates themselves are the retail version of sale items, so they will continue on in the instant-savings form, for quite some time.

    3. Re:Old News? by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 1

      OfficeMax, not Office Depot. Whoops.

    4. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was at a Best Buy store, the price tag listed some weird form of discount, so when I asked a wandering employee, I was told that to get this discount, I had to mail in the forms with receipts. When I asked why it wasnt called a mail in rebate, I was told people dont like that term, so it was renamed... I have not shopped there since, as that is just plain un-called-for.

    5. Re:Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. I started shopping again at Best Buy after hearing that they had eliminated rebates. Turns out all they did was replace the term "rebate" with "check". Just another example of the low regard that they have for their customers. That kind of stupidity just put them deeper on my black list.

  11. Expect rebates to be lower by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 4, Informative

    Part of the whole reason for rebates was that many people never sent them in (I've seen numbers in the 90's showing about 5% of people would send them in). This allowed retailers to put a really low price on the shelf, but in fact make far more money for the item. Disregarding the outright fraudulent rebate scams, this practice wasn't fraudulent but it was obvious that the retailers are simply hoping that few people will actually send the documentation in to get the rebate.

    With rebates taken at the register, expect them to be far more in line with a standard sale discount.

    1. Re:Expect rebates to be lower by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Well, we all know that numbers can be made up :)

      I know several people who worked hard to use rebates and coupons to make their way through this life more affordable. and nowhere near as many people who simply refused to send in rebates.

      in fact, the only real danger was loosing it in the mail. either way :) people can be lazy, but the laziness just wasn't that bad :)

    2. Re:Expect rebates to be lower by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      I have read a few articles over the last year about how many rebate companies are struggling because the amount of rebates turned in had went up SO significantly they were unable to make a decent profit. In times past the amount of people turning them in was 15-20 per 100, Now because of the prevalance of even TIDE having a MIR the amount of rebates sent in is hovering around 50 and higher per 100. I thought I had seen it all when I seen PEPSI with a mail in rebate. I was totally WTF! Give it up. I HATE rebates and would rather a limited amount of a product be available at the lowest price,than to have to work with exaggerated pricing for some supposed super duper deal. I have seen 250g hard drives for 19.99 after instant 20.00 off and 3 MIR's for the rest of the amount with the supposed "normal" retail amount exceeded current newegg pricing by 50.00. That's utter BS imho. Lets just be real.. you make a profit.. and you don't make your customers work their ass off for you to do it. As a previous poster mentioned we the customer pay taxes on the Pre-MIR amounts and if a drive is marked up 50.00 over somewhere else's price do you think the government of the state you are in has any one who's going to say.. well thats just wrong? It pays the state more money to not regulate Rebates so they have no interest in doing so. I know Boston or MA as a whole has passed laws stating MIR price cannot be bigger on an advertisement than the Out the door price of an item. I wish they'd do that here in Cali. Also there has been known instances of rebate companies automatically rejecting a percentage of rebates turned in.. regardless of how well you do your paperwork. I can guarantee if you send a registered letter with your rebate paperwork in it.. You'll get your rebate :D assuming you cross your eye's and dot your tees.. hahaha.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    3. Re:Expect rebates to be lower by Keyboarder · · Score: 1

      The retailers don't give a darn if you turn the rebate forms in or not. I used to work for Best Buy and I can tell you first hand that at least 95% of the rebates are through the manufacturer. And that's if you include inhouse brands as part of the retailer. Best Buy (and the other retailers) gets the same amount of margin whether you fill it out and mail it in or not. I've seen first hand as rebates have been eliminated. People would ask me sometimes "Why don't you have any of the online rebates anymore, they were much better than the mail in ones." It's cuz the ones that used to be online rebates are now instant rebates! It still sucks that nothing's been worked out with companies like PNY and others that still require mail-ins, but I suspect that they'll be gone in due time. I believe Best Buy's goal is to be completely rid of mail in rebates by 2007. That's a heck of a lot better than when retailers wouldn't even tell you if it even had a rebate unless you asked, and even then you had to hunt down the right form! Now adays the ones that still have a mail in rebate, the form just prints up with the reciept automatically. Believe me, NO ONE likes mail in rebates. Not the customers, not the retailers, and not the manufacturers. It all just boils down to logistics and getting the money to the right people reliably. It's definitely nice to see more companies working to eliminate this hastle, but don't assume malice when other explainations work just as well or better. I assure you, you can put away your tin hats. They're not out to get you.

    4. Re:Expect rebates to be lower by wbren · · Score: 1

      At the retail store I work at part-time, we sometimes have DVDs for "free" after a rebate. I'll miss that, because the store is definitely not going to just hand 50 packs of DVD-Rs out to customers for free in the store. I think people may end up regretting the end of rebates, because prices are going to increase. Black Friday sales will be a thing of the past. You won't be able to get that $20 printer anymore, or that "free after rebate" universal remote control. If you make copies of your rebate information and sales slip, you are unlikely to have any problems. Most people run into trouble when this happens:

      Customer: I'm telling you, I swear I sent in the rebate form with the barcode!
      CSR: Do you have a copy of it you could fax to me?
      Customer: No.
      CSR: Goodbye.

      I don't know why Office Max was having so much trouble with rebates, but at the retail store I work at, we might have one customer per month who complains about rebates in the actual retail store. If anything, customers point out to employees how easy it was to send in their last rebate. The vast majority of our rebates are handled online, which makes things smoother. No mailing, no paperwork, no messy handwriting getting in the way... just fill out a form and track your rebate online.

      And then there are people who just don't take the time to send in the rebates... you're throwing money away. Don't make me pay for your laziness by complaining rebates are too difficult.

      --
      -William Brendel
  12. too bad by syrinx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like rebates. Lower price than what a normal sale would be. They're hardly a scam -- if you're too lazy to take the 5 minutes to put the form together it's your own fault. I've done probably 50 rebates over the past few years, and only one of them did I never receive (though now that I think of it, it might have been from OfficeMax, so...). It's easy money for me at the expense of lazy people.

    Now, if they're going to have the exact same prices, just without the mailing in, that'd be great, but I highly doubt that's going to happen.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    1. Re:too bad by Russellkhan · · Score: 1

      Just because you fall for it doesn't mean it's not a scam.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
    2. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Imagine that some stores charged higher prices to, say, people in wheelchairs. They didn't actually advertise the different prices; they just listed the lower price. Even the people in wheelchairs didn't know, they would just realize, often much later, that they'd been changed a higher price. They'd be frustrated, of course, and they'd learn to avoid such stores, but sometimes they'd still end up buying such things. It's a great deal for the store, since the people in wheelchairs often think they will get the lower price, and the store doesn't care if they are screwing people that have enough troubles already. Pretty slimy, huh?

      Ok, now change "people in wheelchairs" to "people with ADD."

    3. Re:too bad by 9Nails · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My problem is complying with the rebate offer. Having to cut the bar code or product logo. Requiring my original sales reciept. (I hope nothing was purchased on that receipt.) And having to fill out the rebate forms. Then paying to stamp and send them all this information. The last two rebates I've sent in for took over 8 weeks to be returned. And both used a 3rd party web company where I could track my status. Both times the status showed rejected because of "multiple offers from the same address." Which wasn't true. This peaks my suspicions, and though I havn't been shorted my due monies, it leaves me siding with the people who call scam.

    4. Re:too bad by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I like rebates. Lower price than what a normal sale would be. They're hardly a scam -- if you're too lazy to take the 5 minutes to put the form together it's your own fault.

      I like to comparison shop. You may discover that item A with a rebate may be the same price as item B without a rebate. Item B might cost a hair more, or might cost a hair less. If the out of pocket money is the same for both items, I might as well get the rebate. But if the out of pocket money is more... screw it. Fortunatly in the web age it's easy enough to google, froggle, what have you. Usually I can get something shipped for the price or less than the rebates, and that is more than spiffy.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This peaks my suspicions

      While you may indeed mean that it brought your suspicions to their highest state, I suspect you actually mean that it aroused your suspicions, in which case the correct verb would be pique, not peak.

    6. Re:too bad by foleym · · Score: 1

      I got a cellphone plan from Amazon last August that came with a $200 rebate. 11 months and 4 phone calls later, with a promise for sending it to me every time, I am still empty handed. Sh!t happens, but when you're down $200 bucks, I don't think you'll like rebates as much. If you've actually done 50 rebates then, you should know about Staples easy rebates. You don't have to mail in anything and you get your money in 2 weeks. The other companies are just slow.

  13. OfficeMax isn't the only one. Best buy IS dropping by Mewtwo · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...in favor of instant rebates, RewardZone perks, and financing offers.

    http://promomagazine.com/incentives/best-buy_04130 5/index.html (Karma whore link)

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 SU CK IT MP AA
  14. Too little, too late by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

    Considering that they miss-micro-managed for years and finally closed up their local store 6 months ago, I don't think much of the last sputter of a dying corporations campfire.

    --
    Cheers, Gene

  15. Well, the truth is .. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    so those of us who always thought that the rebates were a scam (or were too lazy to mail in the card) finally get some savings.

    Rebates are a scam, and any savings you've convinced yourself that you're getting are illusory at best. Rather than apply "discounts" at the register, why don't they just lower their prices. Of course, by doing it this way you simply feel like you're important because you got a "special discount."

    Please. All rebates are is a way to play the float for a while with the customers' money, and if it so happens that the customer forgets to mail in the form, so much the better. Not that mailing in the stupid form necessarily means any thing: rebates are one of the reasons why I stopped shopping Best Buy (the other is because they habitually reshrinkwrap returned goods and sell them as new.) The last time I bought something at Best Buy I sent in the rebate form, along with the original proof-of-purchase because the instructions said that photocopies were not acceptable. I then received a letter politely refusing to send me a rebate, because I hadn't sent the original proof-of-purchase. Best Buy isn't the only outfit that's scammed me on rebates, which is why I simply don't buy anything with a rebate. Literally, unless it's a big-ticket item it is just not worth the time to fill out the damn form, cut out the Proof-of-Purchase, and then mail them to some "fullfillment organization" that will probably just keep the money anyway.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Well, the truth is .. by drissel · · Score: 1

      Some people are more price-sensitive (PS) than others. Retailers want as much of the business as they can get. One way to attract the PS is to offer a discount. To maximize profit, a retailer doesn't want to offer the discount unless necessary. So coupons and rebates have a certain, extra effort required to get the discount. In this way, the PS select themselves. The non-PS can't be bothered. So they don't get the discount.

      No need to imagine conspiracies, rip-offs or playing with the float ... just ingenious retailing.

    2. Re:Well, the truth is .. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That's as may be ... but they've hung themselves with their ingenuity: the fact that rebate programs are becoming such a PR problem that they are being discontinued should tell you that. Part of the problem is that the retailers themselves rarely seem to have an in-house division or group that handles fulfillment ... that's often contracted out. And the companies that take those contracts aren't of equal caliber: some may be good but the ones with which I've had experience seem to be crooks. And your own operation may be honest but if you contract part of it to a crook your customers will eventually perceive you to be a crook as well. Your mileage may have varied, of course, but personally I steer clear of "rebates".

      I disagree with you about playing the float. Customers are drawn in with the promise of a lower (eventual) price, and in the meantime the retailer gets to hang on to a chunk of their money. Even if the customer does eventually get his rebate (no guarantee of that) the retailer may have held on to it for a month or more. That adds up to real money. Maybe that wasn't the reason that rebates were invented, I'll grant you that, but it is most certainly part of their appeal to resellers.

      Those stupid service agreements they push on you when you go to check out are another example of retailers trying to hang on to their customers' money. Why would I want a "service contract" on, say, a $50 cordless phone? Funny ... I thought the purchase price already included a manufacturer's warranty to handle premature failure. Service agreements are mostly a waste of time, but so many customers are suckered into this nonsense that it has become a significant part of profitability for these people. Now, when I bought a big-screen TV a few years ago I did buy a maintenance agreement for it ... but the set is a massive affair that would be difficult to bring back for repairs, and the agreement was for on-site maintenance or replacement. But on a typical consumer-grade item at Best Buy? No thanks.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Well, the truth is .. by radish · · Score: 1

      Look, we all know that not everyone fills in the forms. But that means better savings for those of us that do! If Philips are doing a $50 mail in rebate on a TV they can count on having to pay out maybe 50% of those $50 refunds. But if it's an instant rebate, or just a regular discount, they'll have to provide 100%. So they'll drop the rebate/discount to $25.

      I fill in rebate forms all the time, and I can only think of one time I didn't get my money. I've saved hundreds and hundreds of dollars just by doing a little paperwork and reading the small print. So as far as I'm concerned, keep them mail in and keep them big.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Well, the truth is .. by Jay+Clay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look, from someone in the business, you have it all wrong.

      1) Retailers are rarely the rebate providers. It's the manufacturers most of the time. So no, Best Buy has probably never scammed you on a rebate.

      2) The reason you have to turn in an original UPC, a copy of the receipt, etc, is to prevent fraud. Fraud still happens all of the time, but this stuff is simply in place because if not, people will manufacture a ton of fraudulent submissions. And even with that, over half of our clients elect the "just pay if they call" philosophy, where if someone has bothered to call about their rebate, they will be given it.

      3) If it were up to the people fulfilling the rebates, they'd validate everything sent in. Not only is there is a higher charge for valids compared to invalids, most of the time a fulfillment house is negotiating a contract, the first X customer service calls per month are free, so making the customer happy = less customer service calls = more savings for the fulfillment house.

      4) Rebates give about 3 to 6 times as much reward as a simple discount does. Not only do a lot of people not bother to turn in a rebate form, it produces more sales, and it gives the manufacturer more demographic reports to do specialized advertising. Their marketing departments use the budget given to them that would be used for the simple discount to then use it for this other stuff.

      If you don't want to fill out the rebate form and fill it in, fine; but it's not as if you're going to be saving anywhere near as much anyway. Really, you're talking about a $100 item being repriced at $95 instead of getting a rebate for $20. How much is that extra $5 off going to make for people deciding whether to buy or not?

      Now how many people would if it were $80 after rebate?

    5. Re:Well, the truth is .. by DrDitto · · Score: 1

      You don't get it. Rebates are a way for manufacturers to move products off of the store shelves. Once OfficeMax purchases products, they can't sell them for below invoice without taking a loss. A manufacturer's rebate allows the manufacturer to take the loss so that retails stores are not adverse to keeping an inventory of a certain manufacture's product.

      It is obvious that not many Slashdotter's have ever taken an advanced business class.

    6. Re:Well, the truth is .. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      It is obvious that not many Slashdotter's have ever taken an advanced business class.

      Nope. But I know all the rebates that I've sent in and never received. And frankly, I don't give a damn about the reasons rebates exist, I really don't. All I know is that they have been, by and large, very poorly managed from my perspective. If the vendor of a particular product wants to use the rebate as a financial incentive for retailers to stock his products, that's fine. Just make damn sure that those rebates that are sent in are processed efficiently, otherwise I'm that much less likely to buy that manufacturer's products in the future.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Well, the truth is .. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I understand your reasoning, and I agree with it so far as it goes. I further understand that Best Buy (or any other major retailer) doesn't handle the rebates themselves, which is why I used the term "fulfillment organization". However, as a consumer that doesn't matter to me. From my perspective, all I know is that I've bought products with the promise of significant discounts that never materialized in many cases. Had I known that up front, I'd have spent the money elsewhere and probably gotten a better deal. I have followed the rules, sent in my original copies, and still got screwed. I have called as well, and sometimes that works, sometimes it doesn't: like you said, about half have a "just pay if they call" philosophy. Of course, that still leaves the other fifty percent that don't, and if you happen to call one of those it's "have a nice day and don't bother calling again." All in all, rebates have some serious issues from the consumer's point of view. Given all the advantages to the manufacturer that you've mentioned, the fact that major retail operations are curtailing or eliminating their use of rebates tells me that all is not rosy in rebateland.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  16. from an outside perspective.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I never understood how anyone would put up with the american rebate scheme (though I understand the economic rational behind it, it's basically price discrimination). Let's hope other stores will follow. Then the Americans just have to take care of their banking system and we might actually start calling them civilized.

    Oh, I forgot: please don't add taxes at the cash register, these little price stickers are for, you know, the price. Doesn't make a difference to me if it's taxes or the net price of the product. I want to know if I brought enough cash without trying to find out what the local tax rate is..

    1. Re:from an outside perspective.. by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      part of the reason that prices are "pre-tax" is simply overhead costs
      example RadioShack has 4500 stores in all fifty states and has stores within 5 minutes of 95% of the US (by population) even on the state level thats 50 different sets of tags then we get into places with county/city taxes
      and also you have situations where some elected crook decides that he needs a new house and raises taxes (or his replacement decides to lower them...)
      thats way to much paper to mess with (and heaven help you if a tax got forgotten or the wrong set of tags got shipped)
      besides you can always say something like "pardon me but what is the current tax rate??" and if the clerk can't spit out the number on the spot correctly then use the london taxi test rules aka leave the store (blowing that one is like not knowing the route to the royal castle from any hotel)

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    2. Re:from an outside perspective.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what the fuck are you going on about? Your post sounds like the rantings of an insane person...

  17. Economics of rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought rebates only worked out for the manufacturer because only some people actually care enough to send them in. Thus firms were able to price discriminate. If OfficeMax is automatically applying the rebate, then everyone's getting the discount. Maybe we should expect rebates to become less common or higher pre-rebate prices to compensate?

  18. filled out 2 this morning by sckeener · · Score: 1

    I so hope other retailers follow this. I hated all the hoops I had to jump through to get the forms filled out this morning....the extra copies made, the proof of purchase, the envelope, the stamps...

    Since I pay most of my bills online, I think I use more stamps for rebates than anything else.

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  19. No problems here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've always recieved my rebates. Officemax, Staples, Newegg, anonymous motherboard manufacturers that went out of business. The people who have problems with rebates are either incompetent to fully provide all rebate information in the correct way the company states, or they're impatient and don't follow up if a rebate didn't go through - giving up like they want you to.

    I bought a motherboard from Newegg that came with some pretty hefty rebates. Filled out everything correctly and mailed them in. A few months went by and I followed up by emailing and phoning the motherboard manufacturer to check the status and remind them that they owed me money. Waited another couple months while they supposedly remailed the check, but I never got it. Six months or so after the purchase date, I phoned up Newegg to harang them about the rebates I never recieved from the manufacturer that went belly up. They refunded the total of the mail in rebate value directly to my banking account.

    It's not like I was pining on getting that money from the manufacturer everyday and getting insanely angry about it. I just went slightly out of my way to contact people a few times to insure that I got my check back. I bet most "normal" people just send them in and forget them, which is what the rebate people want to happen so they don't have to pay you.

    Never had a problem with Officemax rebates having bought plenty of rebated DVDs and peripherals over the years.

    1. Re:No problems here . . . by nolife · · Score: 1

      So when you do send in the all required information, you are considered incompetetent because you did not keep hounding them if you do not receive your rebate? If you have to call and resend or fax the copies you made with the same exact information you sent them the first time, the consumer is not the one with the problem.
      Your expectations are too low

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    2. Re:No problems here . . . by Alric · · Score: 1

      Impatience and incompetence are not the only issues. How valuable is your time?

      If you buy a $140 hard drive with two $30 mail-in rebates (a common scenario), how much time will you spend filling out the paperwork, making backup copies, and hassling the two rebate programs? Is $60 (actually more like $54 after taxes and stamps) worth one hour of your time, two hours, three hours? At some point, the rebate is not worth the effort.

      Personally, I just ignore any mail-in rebates less than $40 now, because I assume I'm not going to follow through. Maybe I'm lazy, or maybe I'd just rather spend that time doing almost any other thing, including working an extra hour or whatever to make up the difference.

    3. Re:No problems here . . . by metamatic · · Score: 1
      The people who have problems with rebates are either incompetent to fully provide all rebate information in the correct way the company states, or they're impatient and don't follow up if a rebate didn't go through - giving up like they want you to.

      Wrong. Fry's stiffed me on a rebate. They advertised an item with rebate, but shipped me the same item in slightly different packaging--with a different UPC code. And of course, I didn't find out for six months, so it was too late to do anything about it. (Like, say, disputing the charges with the credit card company.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    4. Re:No problems here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is $60 (actually more like $54 after taxes and stamps) worth one hour of your time, two hours, three hours? At some point, the rebate is not worth the effort."

      Do you get paid off the clock? I love when people make the "my time is too valuable" argument, especially on slashdot. Being here and replying to my post already signifies that you have an overabundance of time that is pretty much worthless to anyone in the real world.

      Have a nice day. :)

    5. Re:No problems here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on the other hand, I bought a video capture card at Fry's several months ago. I was perfectly satisfied with the price on the box. When the girl at the register rang it up, she told me that the product had a $25 rebate that wasn't advertised. She gave me a claim form and printed out a duplicate receipt. I spent 10 minutes filling out the form and scanning the paperwork before I mailed it off. Seven weeks later, I had my twenty-five bucks back. Truthfully, the only issue I've ever had with rebates is that I hate the ones where they just mail the check with no envelope. Those tend to look like junk mail and can get easily tossed - which I'm sure is what they are hoping for. However, I have always gotten every rebate I've sent for.

    6. Re:No problems here . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is, in a sane world where the retailer actually cares about the customer experience, you should have had that money when you walked out the door of the store, not months later after postage and haranging phone calls that took you a paragraph merely to explain.

      If they are willing to sell something to you for price X, you should be able to put the money on the counter and walk out with it, not jump through hoops. It's like saying they'll sell you something for $100, but if you grovel on the floor and act like a good dog, they'll sell it to you for $80.

  20. Good-bye free products by jasonditz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to go to Office Max some weeks, leave with $100 worth of products and $100 worth of rebate forms. I pretty much always got every single one back, so for the hassle of filling out a few forms I was getting all sorts of free items (CD burners, surge protectors, mice, canned air, blank CDs, jewel cases, phones).

    Now because of everyone else's bitching, those days are over. I don't know how the saving on other things are going to be affected by the end of the mail in rebate, but I know for damned sure they're never going to have an instant savings that leaves a dozen items in their store free for the taking.

    1. Re:Good-bye free products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash: When a store says "you saved $x", you didn't actually save $x. You were billed $n+x and then got $x back.

    2. Re:Good-bye free products by Contender+BSEPh · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. For those looking for a great deal on something, a rebate was usually involved. I've sent in well over a hundred rebates and always got a check in the mail. My favorite deal via rebate is still my Samsung laser printer from a few years ago. It was normally a $200+ printer, but office max had a $60 rebate on it and a $20 off $100 purchase coupon. I found the printer on sale at an online retailer for $100, so I called office max and got them to match the price, used the $20 coupon, and sent in the $60 rebate. So after getting the rebate back I ended up with the $200+ printer for $20. There isn't anything wrong with rebates if you: 1. Send them in 2. Remember that you sent them in and keep track of them 3. Realize that they are a loan to the store/manufacturer, and 4. Take that into account when making your purchase decision.

    3. Re:Good-bye free products by Skapare · · Score: 1

      It wasn't free. It cost you time and the hassle of tracking to be sure you didn't get ripped off.

      Want a free ink-jet printer?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    4. Re:Good-bye free products by humankind · · Score: 1

      Except now your personal information is being bought and sold all over the world. You've been identified as a receptive consumer who will get listed in company databases and get even more dead trees mailed to you and telephone solicitations.

      The same thing happens when you fill out warranty registration cards. That info goes into a database that the company sells to other companies to make extra money.

      Plus, while you're wasting lots of time keeping track of the little dingleberries corporate america has promised you, we are on to the next thing.

    5. Re:Good-bye free products by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 15 minutes effort for a free $100 worth of stuff.

      Sure dodged a bullet there, I'm glad you guys were around to save me from all the free stuff.

    6. Re:Good-bye free products by jasonditz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure glad I don't have a choice in the matter anymore now that I can see you guys understand the value of my leisure time so much better than I do.

      My personal information is being bought and sold by a million other people too, and they didn't give me free shit for my trouble.

    7. Re:Good-bye free products by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      Right, but when they're taking $x off the bill at the cash register instead of mailing you $x, you can be damned sure $n isn't going to be equal to zero anymore.

    8. Re:Good-bye free products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose your foil helmet today you nut? Dumb fuck.

    9. Re:Good-bye free products by qohen · · Score: 1

      On average, I also used to go to OfficeMax every week or two and walk out with plenty of free-after-rebate stuff, but that was a long time ago--pretty much ever since OM was bought out by paper-company Boise Cascade Corp. OfficeMax's free-after-rebate deals got worse and worse and then basically disappeared. I haven't been inside an OfficeMax in a long time because of that.

      Even their post-Thanksgiving Black Friday sale in 2005 was lame as far as free-after-rebate stuff goes--it was about as good as what they used to have on a typical Sunday--so for the first time I didn't even bother stopping in (this after years of waiting on line to get in prior to opening and then waiting on long lines at checkout).

    10. Re:Good-bye free products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they didn't give me free shit for my trouble.

      It's only free if your time is worthless.

    11. Re:Good-bye free products by Jtheletter · · Score: 1

      It's only free if your time is worthless.

      For those of us that can multitask such simple things like filling out our contact info on a form and putting together a letter (a sum total of perhaps 2 minutes) this isn't even a blip on the radar. If I'm watching something I like on TV or waiting for my chicken to defrost for dinner then I have time to fill this stuff out that I don't need to bill someone for. Hell, people waste more time using the bathroom in the morning. So yeah, given the tiny amount of time filling out a rebate takes, along with how much time is wasted or spent idling during the day, it is essentially free. Especially when you're talking about any rebate over even, say, $5. If it takes me 5 minutes to fill out the forms and collect the UPCs and I consider my time worth, for example, $30/hr then I have lost $30/60 minutes * 5 minutes = $2.50 of time billing at my arbitrary rate. Yet the rebate is for double this amount so I have made money. For higher amount rebates like for monitors that can be for $80 or more the rebate submission time to money returned ratio is MUCH higher. The phrase "there's no such thing as a free lunch" is techically true, but only really applies in a theoretical world where every moment of time and every cent is held with perfect value and one never wastes either. In reality laziness, marginal value, and perceived value tend to create a more inefficient system that allow for "free" lunches.

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
  21. The idea of rebates isn't bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The concept of mail-in rebates isn't a bad one. It works both in favor of businesses and in favor of more savvy/dilligent customers.

    The real problem is that there are inadequate consumer protection laws (and enforcement) surrounding rebates. Stores and ads should never be able to put the after-rebate price in huge print, disguising the before-rebate price in tiny print in an effort to confuse consumers. And if a consumer mails in all the required pieces (UPC code, etc) to get the rebate, and the company either neglects to send the rebate check by their own deadline or erroneously claims the stuff the consumer sent in was wrong/incomplete, then the consumer should be able to contact some enforcement agency that will go kick the company's ass for lying.

    1. Re:The idea of rebates isn't bad by abertoll · · Score: 1

      Yeah they shouldn't be allowed to reject mail that's registered, or has delivery confirmation. But that's one of their "terms" you know: you're not allowed to prove that they're lying.

      --
      "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  22. Rebates by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I love rebates.

    I've only failed to get two that I filled out properly and followed the rules on and failed to send in one on time and by the rules- so 3 failed rebates- one for $50, the others for less.

    On the other hand, the rebates are often big since a large percentage of other people fail to use them.

    I used to dislike them until I got a system down that made doing them automatic.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Rebates by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Why should I hand over my money to someone, and then beg them to give it back to me?

      Isn't that better than just handing your money over to someone, and then not having an opportunity to get any of it back?

    2. Re:Rebates by kurfu · · Score: 1

      'Tis a far better thing surrender the cash in the first place.

    3. Re:Rebates by chris.evans · · Score: 1

      Only poor people are the target of rebate scam^H^H^H^Hs, other wise they wouldn't buy the item if not promised a lower cost of ownership. The rich can just buy it and who cares right?

  23. Doesn't help the consumer by neatfoote · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I hated rebates as much as the next person, and I usually ended up forgetting to mail in the damn things anyway. But the phasing out of rebates is NOT a great boon for the consumer.

    Rebates are like coupons and generic brands in that they enable retailers to sell the same product at two different prices-- a higher one that you can choose to pay if you want the convenience of not mailing in anything and/or the cache of a name brand, and a much lower one if price matters enough to you to make you clip coupons, mail in receipts or put up with ugly packaging. This is a good thing for everyone involved, because it gives people more options; people choose how much they want to trade convenience for $$, and the company can afford to offer much lower rebate prices because they know everyone won't pay them.

    It might seem that with the elimination of rebates, everyone would get the original rebate price, instead of just a selected receipt-mailing few-- but what I suspect is that everyone will just have to pay a much higher sale price that's an average of the original off-the-shelf and the original rebate price.

    1. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      Well for me its a cheaper price. I'm happy about it. I've had more than half of the rebates I sent in rejected for one reason or another. When I buy something with a rebate I assume i'll never see it even if i mail it in. In additon to the higher tax someone pointed out, you also have the price of the stamp and the TIME to fill out the crap. As an economist how much your time is worth. You'd be surprised. Rebates are a screw.

    2. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by humankind · · Score: 1

      It's not a cheaper price when you factor in the value of your time and other resources.

    3. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Everyone will pay a higher sale price, that is true. However, you are forgetting another problem with rebates:

      Even if you mail in your rebate, it is very likely you will recieve nothing. I have probably mailed in about 5 rebates in my life, and out of those 5 rebates I didn't recieve a single check. As far as I am concerned, rebates are a total scam.

      Even though the manufacterer of the product issues rebates usually, Office Max fields the complaints when they don't arrive. People are going to be pissed off at Office Max, not whatever brand is issuing the rebate.

      From Office Max's perspective, it could very well not be worth having rebates in the store. And remember, rebates are not being banned. You can still shop at another store that issues rebates.

    4. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I did make a mistake when filling out my rebates, or didn't read the fine print. The point isn't that I didn't do anything wrong. The point is that I made a reasonable effort to follow the instructions and fill out the rebate. The point is, I have no problem filling out insurance forms, or forms for a morgtage, or forms to purchase a car, or other forms... that if I misfilled or didn't meet all the requirements, it was because the requirements were specificly obfuscated for the purpose of denying a rebate. Rebates, are by design, intended to make sure that the vast majority of people elgible for the rebate never recieve the rebate.

      Now, I am not accusing them of doing anything illegal. I respect their legal right to issue rebates. But if the purpose of rebates is to lure people into thinking they are getting a discount and then figuring out ways not to give them the money (if this wasn't the case, they could just offer an immediate discount on an item), then that reflects badly on a store that offers rebates. It is a shady, dishonest practice. It might meet the strict legal definitions of what is legal, but it is a disreputable practice regardless.

      When Office Max uses rebates to market products, I associate them with a shady, disreputable practice. Office Max may upset the less than 5% percent who actually manage to properly get rebates by getting rid of rebates in their stores, but it earns them respect with the 95% of the people like me who dislike rebates.

      Now, once again, don't get me wrong, I don't think rebates should be illegal... if you like rebate programs, good for you. What I am saying is that I will spend money in a non-rebate store vs. a rebate store if I have a choice. And in the free market, that means that some stores will cater to my preferences.

    5. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Rebates are like coupons and generic brands in that they enable retailers to sell the same product at two different prices-- a higher one that you can choose to pay if you want the convenience of not mailing in anything and/or the cache of a name brand, and a much lower one if price matters enough to you to make you clip coupons, mail in receipts or put up with ugly packaging. This is a good thing for everyone involved, because it gives people more options; people choose how much they want to trade convenience for $$, and the company can afford to offer much lower rebate prices because they know everyone won't pay them.

      Um, this makes no sense. First of all, IIRC, the point of coupons is to offer an incentive for repeat purchases. If you buy a box of cat food, you get along with it, inside the box, a coupon that gets you a discount on your next box of cat food (applied at the register next time you buy), as long as you buy the same brand. This makes perfect sense; the customer is compensated with a lower price, the company with a stabler cash stream. Or to put it more strongly: even if a seller is offering its product at the lowest rational price for random buyers, it still makes sense for it to offer a better price for repeat buyers, because they provide a definite benefit to the seller.

      However, in the bizarre picture you paint above, sellers create artificial barriers to obtaining the lowest rational price they can offer to random buyers. These barriers require you do do things that are irrelevant to the transaction. In exchange for this, the buyer gets the "benefit" of paying the lowest rational price the seller can offer to random buyers. By performing menial crap tasks irrelevant to the transaction at hand, the buyer bypasses the artificial barriers to obtaining the price they should get. In other words, the "problem" the rebates solve is none other than the one they create in the first place.

      Also, there's the deceptive practice of the seller's advertising the lowest rational price for a product that they intend to obtain per-unit sales revenues greater than the advertised price. At the very least, by holding on to your money while they "process your application" (i.e., "solve" the "problem" they created for you in the first place), they're getting a 0% interest loan from you, on which they can easily obtain interest (the highest-yielding money market funds are offering about 5% currently).

      At its worst, well, if they don't actually intend to give out the rebate to everybody who claims it, then they're even more obviously advertising a lower unit price than the per-unit revenues they have projected. To the buyer, this is a market inefficiency that makes it difficult to obtain the best price, because advertised prices are then not actually true.

    6. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the time spent on this hassle, couldn't you just work some over hours instead, have more money than you saved and your personal details not unnecessarily leaked?

      Seems some people would waste enormous amounts of energy for a $1 discount.

    7. Re:Doesn't help the consumer by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      Wow, people in your country really put up with that? Why should I, the customer, go through so much hassle just to get a discount? Why should I give them my original receipt, thus likely forfeiting any warranty claims (warranty is at least one year by law here)?

      It boggles the mind that some people are actually defending mail-in rebetaes. Great consumerism culture you've developed there. I'm amazed that selling your address to hundreds of dubious outfits is fine with you. Not to mention that these schemes (and the corresponding "$20* ....... *after $100 mail-in rebate" signs) would be very illegal here and in most other countries.

  24. Proof of purchace by Walzmyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what allways buged me about 'em was you had to send in your proof of purchace - then if you had a problem with the product later on you had given up your ace in the hole.

    That and finding out you dind't get cash buy store credit (Bust Buy, D-Link router)

    1. Re:Proof of purchace by continuouslife · · Score: 0

      I've heard tales of a new-fangled invention that allows you to make duplicate copies of paper goods... Something about "photocopy" or something like that... Technology!

      --
      Here's my witty comment about a signature. Ha. Ha.
  25. I bet they could have dropped this sooner if ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    I bet they could have dropped mail-in rebates a lot sooner if the whole process had been patented and thet got sued. But instead, they spent a whole year trying to work things out with the suppliers to drop them? Well, at least now there is some positive results coming out.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  26. why even rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    why not the *real* price to start with, cut the fuzz!

    -m10

  27. I Always Got My Mail-In Rebate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was _never_ scammed. They always delivered. And for that reason I got some of the best deals on the planet (free stuff, new hard drives for $10, etc.).

    Sure it took a little effort: fill out the forms, copy what you mail in, wait awhile. But it was worth the wait.

    I don't know anyone who was scammed, so I must chalk up this grousing to sheer laziness - the bitching of slackers who, like infants crying for the tit, scream "I want my 90% discount now !"

    1. Re:I Always Got My Mail-In Rebate by geminidomino · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I was _never_ scammed...I don't know anyone who was scammed,


      Maybe if you expanded your circle of friends beyond the cockroaches in your basement and your stuffed animals, you might not sound like such a damn fool.
  28. Re:OfficeMax isn't the only one. Best buy IS dropp by Skapare · · Score: 1

    But so far, all we get from BB is words and no actions. How long does it take to just put the honest and true "what you pay at the register" prices on all products, and tell supplies "provide us with in-store instant rebates and discounts. We are not setting shelf pricing based on main-in rebates you may offer."

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  29. My latest rebate experience by dwisely · · Score: 1

    I only buy products with mail-ins if the price without the rebate is still good. It really is a kind of scam. It works for the companies, of course, because they count on the added revenue that comes from the rebates being too hard to obtain, people forgetting to do them, etc. I ordered a Samsung printer from newegg.com (who I still order from and regard as a good company.) Samsung was offering a $50 rebate. So, I very carefully attended to the directions and followed them closely. I wasn't about to give them an excuse to not send the check. Got a post card from them that I submitted the documentation "outside the date range of the rebate." That's right: I sent it in TOO EARLY.

    1. Re:My latest rebate experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      So, I very carefully attended to the directions and followed them closely...I sent it in TOO EARLY.

      The student--
      • Is attentive and listens closely.
      • Plays well with others.
      • Has trouble following directions.
  30. rebate = tax on stupid people by humankind · · Score: 1

    Rebates are a tax on stupidity and laziness. People fall for those schemes, which assume your time, effort, postage, privacy and personal information are worth less than the rebate amount. It's really sad to see people pander to a scheme that is clearly false and misleading advertising. It's good that OfficeMax finally dropped this scheme, but you know they only did so because they got tired of upset customers harassing them looking for rebate checks that never showed up. So don't think for a minute this corporation is listening to consumers' demands in favor of profitability. It obviously became less profitable to mislead consumers than not, so they dropped the program.

  31. What's the point of rebates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't really have anything like that here in the UK. What is the point of them? I know cynics will say that it's just a way to milk money out of the people who forget to send them in, but surely there has to be more to it than that? What's the reason given to consumers for their existence? It just seems like a totally bizarre way of giving a discount with as much hassle for both parties as possible.

  32. Rebates are their only way to beat online prices by VGfort · · Score: 1

    Thats the only time brick and mortar stores can beat online prices. If I need something (and it isnt urgent or perishable like food) I get it online. I check Amazon, eBay, Pricewatch, TigerDirect and NewEgg. Even with shipping costs they cant match their prices. I can easily save $10 to $20 or more most times.

  33. The end of "free" stuff by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Rebate hassles and sales tax deter "runs" where everyone got all their friends to go to the store and wipe the shelves clean the first day of the sale. A $50 item that's free-with-rebates will run at least $0.39 + sales tax on $50, which amounts to $3-$5 bucks, enough to deter buyers who won't actually use the product.

    With everyone getting the rebate, free items will fly off the shelves, especially in states that don't charge sales tax on the instant-rebate value, making a free-with-rebate product truly free.

    Does OfficeMax have stores in Alaska, the land of no sales tax?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:The end of "free" stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hilarious. That's what you people don't understand -- there won't be anymore free deals. You think a store is actually going to have stuff that you can walk out the door without paying a dime for?

  34. Risky Marketing Now Anyway by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Few companies change the way they do business unless they see continuing as a money losing proposition. In a highly competitive market and a significant portion of savvy consumers armed with internet connected blogs and forums, the negative image of the rebate process was bad for business. I would guess that the people most likely to go through the rebate process are also most likely to complain about a bad rebate experience on the net. And if you don't mind mail order, it is easy enough to shop around and find the same or similar product for the same or even less than the after rebate price. Finally, since rebate and scam are, at least in the public mind, nearly synonymous these days, dumping the rebate scheme may be insurance against lost sales later.

  35. Still a scam by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Even if you get the money 'back' its still a marketing scam. Just sell the product for the real price and be done with it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Still a scam by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      So, it's better to buy something for $100 and have that be the end of it than it is to buy something for $100 and then get $25 back a few weeks later? Er, yeah...

  36. A new scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I recently found a new rebate 'scam' when I bought an LCD monitor from Tiger Direct. To process the rebate, you go to onrebate.com. There I was given this choice: "Check By Mail," you receive your rebate check via 1st class mail within 8 to 10 weeks, or "No-Wait Rebate By Check." Here's the description of the no-wait: "OnRebate guarantees we will mail your rebate check via 1st class mail within 3 to 5 business days from receipt of all of your rebate documentation and approval of your claim for a small fee of $5.50 which will be deducted from your rebate check."

    Yes, that's right ... on a $70 rebate, they'll cut 9 weeks off delivering the check for an 8% cut of the rebate.

    As they say "We'll move your rebate to the front of the line! It's called the "No-Wait Rebate."

    Pfffft!

    1. Re:A new scam by wolfie_cr · · Score: 0

      Favorite version of the rebate scam was when I submitted a rebate for a netgear router a) I look at it in the store, I would have bought it with/without rebate but there was a clearly marked 30 dollars rebate b) I send all the docs following their rules c) I get a postcard telling me that "the UPC you submitted does not qualify for the rebate" how am I suposed to know why UPC's qualify and which ones don't? ughhhhh

  37. Sign of the times by intrico · · Score: 1

    IMHO, this is a sign of competition introduced by the competitive on-line market place. Many typical shoppers are realizing that they can almost always get products from on-line-only retailers that are equal in price or even cheaper than the so-called "price after rebate" at the Brick & Mortar retailers. Who wants to wait months on end to get a rebate check when you can realize the discount immediately by simply ordering the product? Rebate or not, where I live it is impossible to get competitively priced computer hardware from the B&M retailers. In my city, we have best buy, circuit city, comp usa, office max, office depot, costco, sam's club as well as numerous ma-and-pa shops to choose from, (what *looks* like a reasonable amount of competition) but the markups on major hardware components still seems to be excessive. The only reason a lot of these places are still making money is because of the stupid masses, who are gradually becoming less-stupid.

    1. Re:Sign of the times by popsicle67 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how can CompUSA make money with Newegg around unless people are stupid.

  38. Circuit City, Staples by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since we're on the subject of going overboard with mail-in rebates, have any of you guys had the displeasure of looking through a Circuit City newspaper ad lately? The damned things are almost entirely just mail-in rebate catalogs. Let's hope they get a clue soon and drop these things.

    Not to mention my complaint about the flyer's usability problems, with the portrait-layout cover, causing the thing to disintegrate into pieces when you mistakenly unfold it and try to page through it from the "left"...

    On the other side of the coin, Staples at least lets you file for the rebates entirely online. No mailing, nothing. It's not any quicker to get the stuff back in the mail, but at least it's significantly less of a pain in the ass to file for the things. And no, I'm not a corporate shill for Staples. Honest. ;)

    1. Re:Circuit City, Staples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On the other side of the coin, Staples at least lets you file for the rebates entirely online. No mailing, nothing. It's not any quicker to get the stuff back in the mail, but at least it's significantly less of a pain in the ass to file for the things."

      Actually, yes it is quicker. If you do it online you'll get it back in 2-3 weeks. If you mail it in you're back to the normal 6-8 weeks. Other companies should be doing what Staples is doing, not getting rid of them entirely. Get rid of them entirely and the store won't be able to offer deals that were as good as they were after rebate, so the customer loses out on good deals, and the store loses sales. It's another example of how poorly OfficeMax is run, they try to beat Staples at everything they do, but end up trying so badly, it hurts their bottom line in the process.

  39. Tax advantage of rebates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    For the self employed, it is GOOD to pay full price and get a rebate later, rather than "instant savings".

    When it comes time to write off business purchases, the receipt that shows "$200+tax" is far better than "$50"...

  40. This isn't much of a relief for me by Saeculorum · · Score: 1

    It's been somewhat well-known on various consumer sites that OfficeMax has been looking for ways of reducing rebates on their products for awhile, especially after Staples came out with EasyRebates. This is only going to reduce the amount of money I spend at OfficeMax. Of course, that's a benefit for OfficeMax. Over the past three years, I have received back more in rebates and coupons than I have actually spent at the store (that includes postage and the like). It's really quite easy to get rebates if you know the game. You fill out a form, scan the paperwork you send in, and wait. In three years with 300+ rebates, I have had precisely two problems with rebates. Once, it was taken care of over the phone and the other time, I messed up a rebate for a $2 pen. I didn't even bother to pursue that one.

    This is not going to be a benefit for consumers. They are simply going to take the money they spend on rebates and put 50% of it toward reducing prices and pocket the rest. It's free publicity for them and they get to make their balance sheet look better at the end of the year. I guess that's better than getting nothing back from a rebate, but it's not as if they're going to be offering their products for free instead of free after rebate.

    1. Re:This isn't much of a relief for me by One+Louder · · Score: 3, Informative
      I recently did a Staples "Easy Rebate" on an HP printer, filling out all the information correctly and even getting a confirmation that everything had been verified by Staples, only to get a rejection from HP due to "insufficient information".

      Staples subsequently disavowed the rebate ("we don't process them") and it finally took a couple of emails back and forth to HP to get the matter "resolved". However, I just got *another* rejection from HP in the mail. So now I have an email from HP saying the rebate has finally been accepted and a physical letter that saying it hasn't. Meanwhile, the deadline is looming.

      About two-thirds of the rebates I've done have been "rejected" only to be "resolved" after contacting the fulfillment company pointing out that they already have all the information they claim they don't. I've even received rejection letters claiming that they haven't received a serial number - with the serial number printed on the letter. It seems like it's just one more barrier they erect to avoid or delay paying, hoping you'll drop the matter.

  41. Those "normal" businesses by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1, Troll

    made your clothes, your house, your car, and your computer, and virtually everything else you own or consume.

    Please sell everything you own, and stand outside naked in the rain. Or admit that you really are willing to deal with "normal" businesses. Most black/grey market stuff is either cheap knock-offs, or costs less due to failing to reward everyone who created it, or by dodging taxes. I do not like taxes either, but they are the price we pay to live in a civil society. Suck it up and pay your fair share.

    1. Re:Those "normal" businesses by asuffield · · Score: 1

      I do not like taxes either, but they are the price we pay to live in a civil society.

      You mean "they are the price we pay to live in a warmongering, corrupt society". Eliminate those two and your taxes will drop to less than half what they currently are. Do not underestimate the power of government waste.

    2. Re:Those "normal" businesses by NihilEst · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You mean "they are the price we pay to live in a warmongering, corrupt society". Eliminate those two and your taxes will drop to less than half what they currently are.

      You're obviously very young or have a very short memory. Government rarely adjusts taxes to meet its needs except when government itself predicts a revenue shortfall. Corruption, war, economic imbalance, social disasters ... these things don't matter at all, except to raise taxation rates. It takes a truly thick-skinned, courageous politician/leader to adjust government seizures downward because they're no longer necessary: there are always bureaucrats who'll swear they need more, segments of society who want to dismantle the "rich", and groups with similar motives. Gutless leaders simply leave taxes as they are, or raise them instead of ordering bureaucrats to do with what they have.

      What matters is the government's propensity to seize property: if they see fit to do so, they will. Whether politicians call it "progressive" or "regressive" is mere rhetoric. At the end of the day, they've still taken your property. If you can succeed in getting them to seize someone else's property instead of yours, then your 'side' has won the political skirmish of the day.

      The power to tax is the power to destroy. Government just about always exercises its powers, often just because it can. There is no such thing as a 'temporary' tax.

      --
      Founding member: He-Man Windoze Hater Club
    3. Re:Those "normal" businesses by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      made your clothes, your house, your car, and your computer, and virtually everything else you own or consume.

      I buy my clothes used from the thrift store at a very low price compared to the retail stores. Its almost cheaper to throw them away than to wash them. My car is used, I paid cash, so I don't have to give the title to the loan place _AND_ pay higher taxes and higher insurance rates for full coverage that costs more than a cheap car does like mine. My computer I bought new from Apple with a discount, no hidden fees, in fact they gave me a deal on some software that I wanted as well.

      The moral here is that to escape the bait and switching, hidden fees, fees on returning defective equipment from manufacturers that failed to ship working versions of their products for the past _2_ revisions of their product (true story!), and all of this crap, I do have to "drop out" to some degree and find more unconventional and more honest and upfront means of doing commerce.

      And to me, that is sad.

      Extra taxes and fees at hotels? Gone, I will pay a flat, upfront fee at a campground that is lower and more honest and upfront, and well, at least a different experience than the luxury of having the ability to pay an exorbitant fee for room service. In fact, most campgrounds will just take cash put in an envelope (about $10/night). They don't also ask your life history and sell it to someone either. Why they need life history to rent a room for one night is only benefiting someone I don't know, and hurting my right to privacy.

      Its not that I can't pay these extra fees, that is the whole reason that they charge them. Because they can.

      Why am I protesting, and saving my hard earned money for me and the people I love?

      Because I can _and_ I want to do that vs pay extra for nothing to someone I don't know and don't care about.

      Its also common for me to get tickets to sold out rock concerts from people _minus_ the Tickemaster tax for the privilege of them selling a ticket. They typically get 30+% of the face value of the ticket and have the balls to charge the buyer _EXTRA_ to print the ticket on their own paper with their own ink vs mailing it to the customer for only the included extortion fees.

      Legitimate businesses are making the mafia look like pussies. Any inquiry at the local "Payday loan" place will convince you that loan sharking by the mafia is a better deal. (No refund on your kneecaps though :)

    4. Re:Those "normal" businesses by kz45 · · Score: 1

      I buy my clothes used from the thrift store at a very low price compared to the retail stores. Its almost cheaper to throw them away than to wash them. My car is used, I paid cash, so I don't have to give the title to the loan place _AND_ pay higher taxes and higher insurance rates for full coverage that costs more than a cheap car does like mine. My computer I bought new from Apple with a discount, no hidden fees, in fact they gave me a deal on some software that I wanted as well.

      That's good for you. Apple is no different than other companies. They sell expensive shit and people buy it. I'm surprised you bought an apple. They are pricey. But I guess since you aren't spending money on new clothes or hotel rooms, you have exra to spend on expensive computer equipment.

      The moral here is that to escape the bait and switching, hidden fees, fees on returning defective equipment from manufacturers that failed to ship working versions of their products for the past _2_ revisions of their product (true story!), and all of this crap, I do have to "drop out" to some degree and find more unconventional and more honest and upfront means of doing commerce

      There is no bait and switching. I know when I go to a store to get a harddrive with an advertised mail-in-rebate that It's not instant. If you aren't lazy, you can get your money back from these rebates (i've all of them back from office max and staples).

      Beyond that, most stores have fliers telling you prices.

      It sounds like you are just bitter. Bitter that you had to deal with a shitty company (which happens from time to time) and bitter that you don't have a lot of money. I have had many good and bad experiences with companies. You just need to stay informed and make good judgement calls before doing business.

      Extra taxes and fees at hotels? Gone, I will pay a flat, upfront fee at a campground that is lower and more honest and upfront, and well, at least a different experience than the luxury of having the ability to pay an exorbitant fee for room service. In fact, most campgrounds will just take cash put in an envelope (about $10/night). They don't also ask your life history and sell it to someone either. Why they need life history to rent a room for one night is only benefiting someone I don't know, and hurting my right to privacy

      Unless you've been under a rock for the past 10 years, these fees aren't hidden. I always assume the cost will be $10-$12 on top of the regular fee they advertise. it's just a part of doing business with hotels. I would rather pay extra to stay in a nice, air-conditioned hotel room for the night than a campground (don't get me wrong, I do enjoy camping).

      Its also common for me to get tickets to sold out rock concerts from people _minus_ the Tickemaster tax for the privilege of them selling a ticket. They typically get 30+% of the face value of the ticket and have the balls to charge the buyer _EXTRA_ to print the ticket on their own paper with their own ink vs mailing it to the customer for only the included extortion fees.

      it's called good business. If a ticket was too expensive, people wouldn't be buying them and they would lower the price. It shouldn't be against the law to charge $1000 for a concert ticket. This would never happen because people wouldn't be able to afford it and they would lose all kinds of money, but that is what economics is all about.

      Legitimate businesses are making the mafia look like pussies. Any inquiry at the local "Payday loan" place will convince you that loan sharking by the mafia is a better deal. (No refund on your kneecaps though :)

      If a business is over-charging for a service, go somewhere else.

      You sound like you have your tin-foil hat on a little too tight.

    5. Re:Those "normal" businesses by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      There is no bait and switching.

      Oh?

      "Free stuff on the internet: Traysaver.com"

      Foed by me!

    6. Re:Those "normal" businesses by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Oh?

      "Free stuff on the internet: Traysaver.com"

      Foed by me!


      okay. The site is not selling anything and in does in fact have free things from the Internet. Try again.

  42. Re:OfficeMax isn't the only one. Best buy IS dropp by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    No actions yet, but they say it'll be done by 2007.

  43. Rebate reviews... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking a closer look at the site linked in the blurb (http://www.rebateroulette.com/), it's a rebate review site. Should be useful in determining which rebates to stay away from...

  44. Our forefathers made the bed we lie in by jdbartlett · · Score: 1

    but those "normal" businesses make the sheets that bind us.

    I am not opposed to paying "fair share", but you're missing the parent writer's point: this is much more than fair share. One of America's founding ideals was "no taxation without representation" - conveniently dodging the "who" of representation. Why are our cell bills so expensive and our VoIP bills getting tax? Lobbying telcos.

    1. Re:Our forefathers made the bed we lie in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of America's founding ideals was "no taxation without representation" - conveniently dodging the "who" of representation.

      Maybe you should ask your congressman who the who is.

    2. Re:Our forefathers made the bed we lie in by publius_jr · · Score: 1
      I take your point to be that I am represented, so all this taxation is legitimate. I have two objections.
      1. (No representation ==> No taxation) does not imply (Representation ==> Any taxation). In other words, some taxes are inherently unjust, in that they forcefully transfer property from the deserving (the earners) to the nondeserving (the non-earners). And what if I disagree with how my money is being spent, on bombs and death (or as some say, securing the homeland)? My only recourse is to become unproductive. I can sit on my ass all day and collect money, or work my ass off and be forced to decide between my liberty (being free from prison) and my morality (not killing or stealing from innocent people across the globe). A fucked-up society has our gross taxation made.
      2. Also, I don't really feel represented in Congress. I disagree with my house representative and two senators about fundamental things, like the Constitution. All of them voted recently for the proposed Amendment to the Constitution that would have banned "flag desecration". Such an amendment, striving to save a symbol, is anathema to the spirit of the Constitution, and desecrates something much more than a symbol, the actual fundamental basis for our nation.
      But technically you are right in that I am represented, for I am only a small part of my neighborhood, and my neighbors chose collectively these Constitutional ignoramuses to represent our neighborhood, hence me. My problem is that these representatives, along with most others around the nation, exceed their power, while my Constitutional protections are no longer protecting me. Hell, the Constitution is having a hard enough time protecting itself.
    3. Re:Our forefathers made the bed we lie in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. I'll ask him the next time he calls to talk.

      OOoohhhh, wait a minute- He doesn't even know I'm alive. So how the fuck can he represent me!!?!?!?!!!??!???

  45. Re:Those "normal" businesses --taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His point was: in reasonable countries (i.e., outside the US), quoted prices include all taxes etc., displaying the price that one would be paying at the cash register. The US practice is basically price obfuscation: they quote only a part of the price, since I can't buy the goods without the "extras", so the quoted price itself does not indicate anything. Considering how stuff is layered on top, some net prices may be even impossible to compare even if they are taxed the same. (Google "stealth inflation Pogue" for a more thorough writeup on this.)

    There are a number of industries in Europe which try to advertise around this (airlines: "1 euro flights", if one ignores ~EUR60 of additional fees and taxes), and they always get fined by consumer protection agencies.

  46. After purchasing my new car by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    Well no shit. Because the dealer got the money. They had the paperwork.

  47. I'm ignorant... by l3v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...but I never could understood why american folks never raised hell about this whole rebate system. I mean come on, if I go in a store, I want to see 1). the exact total gross price which I have to pay for the thing when I get to the register, and 2). I don't want to see some fictional price displayed which has nothing to do with the amount of money you have to shell out at the register, but some hypothetical price you might arrive to after you sign yourself up into some company databases by filling and mailing in some paperwork. Like these companies would be some aiding organizations with no lurking motives, never using your data for ads, etc. If they'd be willing to give you the stuff cheaper, they'd give it cheaper. But they know exactly that most people will probably not send in the paperwork, so they don't have to pay you back that hypothetical difference.

    This is just stupid. Deeply stupid. Yes, I've read all those opinions about how this is so good since they can get oh so many stuff for "free"... now come on, there's a joke I've known for a long time, sounds like this: "- How old are you, young prince ? - I'm 21. - Wow, and you still believe in fairytales ?".

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    1. Re:I'm ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA. Land of stupidity, home of the fools. What do you expect?

      It's gonna take quite some time for them to catch up to the civilized world, you know.

  48. Armchair posters and moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously 90% of people on Slashdot have little experience with rebates and can't imagine that they wouldn't get one if they tried because it says so on paper. Please, if you don't know what rebates are IN PRACTICE, don't post that it isn't a scam nor moderate up someone who says that it isn't a scam.

  49. Discounts for all = much less per user than rebate by Yardboy · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: personally I like rebates and have never had a problem getting mine filled.

    Don't think for a minute that suddenly you're going to get that $50 rebate as a direct discount at the register. The principle behind rebates, whether you like them or not, is that only 10% or less of people are going to actually take the time to fill in and mail the rebate. So 100 people buy a $100 product with a $20 rebate, 10 people send in and the rebate costs the retailer/manufacturer $200. The r/m is not going to pony up more than the $200 they would spend on a rebate program, so if everyone gets a discount at the register instead, it's only going to be a $2 discount. So now, what used to cost the average person $100 is $98, and what used to cost me the rebate-guy $80 is now ... $98. Sucks, imho.

    No allowance here for the cost of running the rebate programs, but you get my drift (and they're not going to past those savings along to us anyway).

    --
    drink beer, and let the water run the mill
  50. News Flash - NYSE:OMX by fastgood · · Score: 1

    Itasca IL, 10 Oct 2006

    Preliminary Q3 results for Office Max Inc. (formerly Boise Cascade Corp)
    show same store sales down 3% -- although profits and volumes on target.

    Baffled analysts are investigating recent complicated bookkeeping changes.
    The company reiterates that every other single sales measure has improved.

  51. Rebates by kurfu · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see these things done away with.
    I'm still waiting for a check from a hard drive I bought back in 1997.

    The whole thing is silly...
    Why should I hand over my money to someone, and then beg them to give it back to me?
    Sound like a game that only an idiot would enjoy.

  52. A reason why by onetwentyone · · Score: 1

    I have worked for both Office Max and Office Depot. One of the many things Office Max prided itself on (prior to being bought up by some bigger company) was how they had nearly NO DEBT. It makes it easier to be agile and do things like removing rebates when you're turning such a healthy profit. Office Depot on the other hand was doing stuff like getting employees to by their own uniforms, store using materials so they wouldn't have to buy longer lasting badges and so forth.

  53. Stop buying or stop complaining! by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    filled out 2 this morning I so hope other retailers follow this.

    If you keep buying products because of the rebates, companies will keep offering them. If you want companies to stop buying rebates, you have to stop buying products with rebates, even if it means paying more. Companies don't read your comments on Slashdot, they look at their profits. The only way that companies will take notice is if their profit falls.

    What's that you say? You don't want to have to pay more? You'd rather get it at the cheaper price even if it means filling out rebate forms? Then stop complaining about them and do the extra work involved. You don't get free stuff for nothing.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Stop buying or stop complaining! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Nah. The real way to kill rebates isn't merely to not "keep buying products because of the rebates", it's to ensure that when there is a rebate, no matter how small, you send in everything and, if you don't get the rebate, you raise holy hell until you do.

      The profitability of rebates is based upon people not actually having the time to execute them. As evidenced here, companies do not want to actually fufil their part of the bargain and, in many cases, will lie, cheat, and essentially do anything else, to avoid actually paying them. They don't like paying rebates. They merely like people thinking something costs less than it actually does. Others have posted here pretending there are advantages to the operator of the program such as the ability to collect marketing information, but realistically, that's possible anyway and rebates are an absurdly expensive way of getting that data.

      Rebates will die when TWO things happen. When people ignore them when buying (except to complain, loudly and obtrusively, if the retail outlet is displaying the "rebated price" in a larger, more misleading, font than the real price), and when people take notice of them after the purchase. When both happens, not only are rebates not helping sales, but they're costing the operator of the program money.

      Until both happen, nothing will change. You can't simply ignore them, because there will be no evidence to the operators of the programs that they're not helping sales (and intuitively most will assume they are helping sales.) You have to make them expensive.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  56. As a GeekSquad Agent by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    I can say that most customers who buy laptops that mess up, or other things tend to like the PSP. I'm sure most people here, myself included don't feel a need for one, but joe sixpack seems to love them. BestBuy has had plans to end rebates since 05, and in 05 they stated that they will be gone by 07.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:As a GeekSquad Agent by wolfie_cr · · Score: 0

      Perhaps for some people a PSP is a good value but for many its not on their best interest to get one Their claim of "you get a free battery" or "the LCD is problematic" is completely ridiculous, its one thing to hear the sales pitch and a very different one to try to get what was promised On top of that I can only say "no thank you, I don't want one " so many times without losing my cool

  57. Levels of Indirection by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Here we have a Slashdot article, that links to another article, that links to yet another article. That's one level too much indirection, I would think.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  58. finally get some savings? Bullshit! by frovingslosh · · Score: 2, Insightful
    To everyone who is rejoicing about this and suggesting it's time for other to follow suit, let me tell you that you are wrong. Yea, I know this is an unpopular thing to say and that zelot modders will quickly mod me down and burn my karma just because they don't like what I'm going to say, but that doesn't change the truth.

    Several years ago we were rolling in freebies and good deals. I used to have to decide which store to be at when they opened, there were so many good offers. And I did get a lot of loot from OfficeMax, including plenty of Free After Rebate CDRs and other free stuff, as well as good low prices on other things. I have extensive records on my rebates. I have received ever single rebate on everything I bought through OfficeMax. Yes, occasionally it did take a call to a rebate center, and OfficeMaAx dealt with some really bad "services", but I got it all. Those unwilling or too lazy to do this, fine, but don't spread the lie that we'll "finally get some savings", we are loseing the savings big time.

    The rebates had virtually died already at OfficeMax. In fact they had already started advertising many items caliming Savings with "No Rebate Neded". But I couldn't quite find the savings. One week that they were selling a "Gread Deal" on a hard disk (WD brand if I remember right) for $89.99 "NO Rebate Required", I got the same size hard drive for $29.99 at CompUSA after rebate, and it was even a Segate drive with a 5 year warranty, not a WD 1 year take-a-chance drive. I've seen this pattern over and over again. The rebates are vanishing, but the good deals are not being replaced by true deals in the form of low prices. Same for Best Buy. They have almost completely dropped rebates, and I have not found one thing to buy there since the week they announced their identity tracking personal information database wallet busting loyality cards. Rebates are gone, but good deal prices have not replaced them.

    Yes, I didn't like paying tax on the unreal higher price. I didn't like waiting to get my money back and occasionally having to make a phone call or even two. I didn't even like paying for the stamp (there were days that I sent out ten or more rebate envelopes, it adds up). But I loved the free stuff, and I certainly would pay the sales tax on a stack of fee CDs or DVDs to get them. Those days are gone. I don't really know how the organizations justified the offers, but I took them.

    I doubt that those of you who are saying that we are "finally going to get some savings" are really that stupid that you haven't seen the trends, or that you would say this without any evidence at all to back it up when there is plenty of evidence to the contrary (my above hard disk example is just one of many that I could post). I rather suspect that what you mean is "I was too lazy to send in the rebate or just passedup the deal because I didn't want to deal with it, so now I'm glad that no one else is getting the deal either".

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:finally get some savings? Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't buy stuff with rebates anymore... Why? I've been burned too many times with the scams and I'm sick of the false advertising. The last time was the most memorable. I sent in the rebate forms, the receipts, photocopied everything, circled the correct items on the receipts, *sent the forms in the day I purchased the drives*. The rebate center is in Miami, about 20 miles from my house. Of course when I got the rejection notice I was pretty amazed, considering I'd gone over everything twice to make sure everything was perfect. What did the company say? It had arrived too late. Eh? You mean it took the post office three weeks to move a letter 20 miles? I ended having to contact the Better Business Bureau and the Attorney General's Office before they sent me the $50 check. At that point I was convinced that they dropped random rebate requests on purpose. As for false advertising, take a stroll into a random CompUSA and you'll see a table in front with FREE stuff. The FREE is in 6" high red letters on a white background. The "*After Rebate with purchase of an HP Computer" disclaimer is less than 1/4" high, with a thin, white font on a red background hidden the border of the enormous "FREE" sign.

      But they're not all bad. I picked up a decent laptop for $350 after rebate. I've gotten free software, media, peripherals, and other stuff.

    2. Re:finally get some savings? Bullshit! by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

      Rebates are a scam, and the only reason you were getting great deals is because countless other people are getting ripped off, to help pay for your free cd's. For every $1 you have saved, probably $100 or more had been taken in by these companies offering rebates.

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
    3. Re:finally get some savings? Bullshit! by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Yes, occasionally it did take a call to a rebate center, and OfficeMaAx dealt with some really bad "services",

      There's your problem... People are certainly NOT willing to do that, nor should they have to.

      The rebates are vanishing, but the good deals are not being replaced by true deals in the form of low prices. Same for Best Buy. They have almost completely dropped rebates, and I have not found one thing to buy there

      Quite the opposite. I HAVE seen really good deals. Packs of CD-Rs which used-to be $25 (occasionally with a $25 mail-in rebate) are now $7 ALL THE TIME. Perhaps mail-in rebates aren't the only cause of that, but the deals are there, they just aren't the pants-wetting FREE! FREE!!! FREE!!! offers.

      And besides that, you do simply need to wait a while for systems to switch over. They're probably working on switching now, so they'll be ready for Back to School sales, and eventually the huge After-Thanksgiving and pre-Christmas mass sales.

      Perhaps the lack of discounts you're seeing just HAPPENS to coincide with the end of the holidays, and year-end unloading of wherehouses for tax purposes.

      I rather suspect that what you mean is "I was too lazy to send in the rebate or just passedup the deal because I didn't want to deal with it, so now I'm glad that no one else is getting the deal either".

      You're obviously not familiar with the Prisioners Dilemma.

      Sure, by exploiting other people (who pay the higher price, unwilling to hassle with the rebate) you can save some more money. However, your savings WERE at the expense of other customers. If I walk into a store, and want to buy some DVD-Rs, I don't want to pay $20 with a $15 mail-in rebate, I'd much rather pay $15 or so, ALL THE TIME, and not get ripped off, or hassled. It works out better for everyone that way.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:finally get some savings? Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who say that they're finally going to get some savings are generally the ones who are too lazy to send in that little rebate form with a UPC code. I too send in all of my rebates. Now if they were to do away with rebates and give us the same savings that we would have received from the rebate, this would be great. But as always, you have to shop around for the deals.

  59. Re:No problems here . . .EXCUSE ME... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I bought a motherboard from Newegg that came with some pretty hefty rebates. Filled out everything correctly and mailed them in. A few months went by ...Six months or so after the purchase date...

    And you call that "No Problems Here"??? No wonder you're an AC.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  60. No by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, it would be better to just pay the $75 and be finished with the entire transaction. ( that was the point of my post )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No by jakarta-milwaukee · · Score: 1

      It would be better, except it's not gonna happen. Instead of some people getting $25 back, it's going to be everyone getting $2.50 off (or less).

      --
      google: verb - to search for information on the Internet.
    2. Re:No by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      Well, sure, but it's just not going to work that way. The products are being sold for the "real price"; the rebates can be and frequently are steeper than an ordinary discount, because they can count on not everyone redeeming them. If everybody who buys a product gets a discount applied at the register, it obviously can't be for as much as it can be if only a small percentage gets it (and even then not right away).

      The point of the rebate from the manufacturer or retailer's point of view is to entice more people to buy it, some of whom will subsequently fail to bother with the redemption even though the intent to redeem was part of what got them to buy the product in the first place. In order to see this sales boost, the manufacturer / retailer is willing to sacrifice some of the money back to the consumers, since (hopefully) it will still be offset by the overall increase in revenue from all the people who bought the thing that might not have had there been no rebate. Since rebates can be quite steep (while they're obviously not always so steep as this, I've more than once seen rebates on an item that equalled or even exceeded the whole price, making the item essentially free except for the sales tax and the wait), they clearly cannot be applied to products as conventional discounts at the same levels.

  61. Way to dismiss others' experiences by Create+an+Account · · Score: 1

    Just be very anal and obsessive compulsive about how you fill everything out and you'll have no problems.

    You haven't had problems. That doesen't mean others haven't. It certainly doesn't mean others won't in the future. One of the most common complaints is rebates that require the original proof of purchase. Sometimes the firm (incorrectly) says the PoP was never sent, and they won't accept a copy (which you might have saved, being prudent.) This has nothing to do with people not reading and following the directions.

    Millions of people make this very complaint. Probably some of them forgot to send the PoP, but certainly not all of them did.

    I guess it helps that I'm very anal and obsessive compulsive.

    My. How self deprecating you are. You forgot arrogant.

  62. Painstakingly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You posted: I used to painstakingly photocopy all the materials

    See, I dont care to painstakingly do anything for a service.
    I want to walk in buy what I want and walk out.

    Companies that want me to work for them be wary, I have an alternative and am sure I can find many products with a simple and enjoyable 'rebate' already built in. Thank you, OfficeMax. I now will drive to your store first, and then drive, literally, around the corner to check 3 other similar stores that carry many of the same products.

    Now, if I can just get Voodoo to give me such a rebate on my next purchase. I can dream, no?

  63. what a mess by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 1

    I've read many of the comments in this thread and can't understand this situation at all.

    in the UK, the price is says is the price you pay.

    even the US habit of not including taxes is BS. I can't see how rebates could possibly be anything BUT a total scam.

    my uneducated guess is that the problem in the US is that individual states can't get things done, and the federal powers are all in the pockets of big business. you need total independence or total unity, the USA half-assed version is useless (for citizens).

  64. Phone bill. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Call your phone company. Those charges aren't taxes. They are passing on the cost of mandated services as separate items in your bill instead of folding them into the price like normal businesses do with costs of doing business. It is unfortunate that ALL of the phone companies do this, so you're stuck. Seems there is a bit of a market failure going on here.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Phone bill. by arcadesdude · · Score: 1

      taxes mandated services sounds strikingly similar

      --
      --arcades
    2. Re:Phone bill. by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true that there are TWO sins here: one is the government for requiring many services (who should pay for 911 for instance..) rather than purchasing them like normal entities. The other is the phone company for not folding costs of doing business into their advertised price.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  65. No more FREE stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I also must say I find it disappointing. I used to see free CD-Rs all over the place and a couple weeks ago I even got free DVD+Rs. People bitching though is driving up prices. I got 100 free DVD+Rs for $24.95 with a $25 mail in rebate. When I look for sales in the stores for instant rebates, the best deal I've even seen is $20 for 100. So lets say it costs me $2 after taxes/stamps/etc. with the rebate, which I've done the math, thats more then what it is, its closer to $1... The DVD+Rs now cost closer to 2 cent each compared to the usual 20 cents each for a good sale/instant rebate. If I'm spending 2 cents, I'm going to be much more liberal about giving out the DVDs and just giving everyone I know a video I made then if I have to pay 20 cents each.

    Come on, lets put this into perspective. If you see a dime on the floor, you might not think its worth the effort to pick it up. If you see a $1 on the floor, you're much more likely to pick it up. I guess I'm a little cheaper then most people, I won't pick up pennies but I'll pick up any silver coin. Pennies just are too much hassle IMO.

  66. There are still good places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I ask people around the world where is a good place to live, and you know what? There is no definitive answer.

    I think that what you really mean is: "The USA was a good place to live, 15 years ago. But it's been getting steadily worse and really isn't a good place anymore." Plus, you could have mentioned that it is currently run by a bunch of bigots who seem intent on turning the rest of the world into enemies.

    There are still good places to live - mostly small countries: Switzerland, Luxemburg... There's a mag called International Living (google for it) that runs articles on pleasant places to move to. Some of these places have high living costs - you need to get a job there to live there.

  67. complain complain complain by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    I'm too lazy to mail in the card; I think mail-in rebates are a rip-off; I don't want to pay full sales tax if I'm getting money back; I won't shop anywhere that uses mail-in rebates; I don't want to buy my own stamps; I don't want to go out of my way to find a mailbox...

    There's an old saying about not looking a gift horse in the mouth. I wish I could come up with a witty way to say "don't complain about trivial matters when you're getting a discount that nobody had to offer".

    Rebates are a motivator to get people to buy products. I can understand if a rebate doesn't motivate you enough to buy the product, or if you buy products and are too lazy to mail in the paperwork, but complaining as if mail-in rebates violate some sort of basic human right guaranteeing discounted retail prices is just silly.

  68. The solution to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vote Libertarian, then you won't have any taxes to worry about.

  69. Liar. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    NewEgg doesn't do rebates. Oh sure, some of the products they sell have manufacturer rebates, but those apply to every new purchase, not just NewEgg. When you shop at NewEgg, the price they show you in BIG BLACK LETTERS is the actual price you pay. The "rebate" price is in a font about 1/3rd the height of the real price, and it's under the real price.

    This is one of the things I like most about NewEgg. No rebates. No bullshit. I give you my money, you give me my shit. Fast.

  70. News for you: we're getting the deal. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't like waiting to get my money back and occasionally having to make a phone call or even two. ... ...so now I'm glad that no one else is getting the deal either

    Except, we are getting the deals. Online. Brick-and-mortar stores used rebates to try and compete with the low-overhead of online dealers like Amazon or NewEgg. Those $0.00 price tags were on items that made the company no money anyway... they're just to get you into the store, with hopes that you'll see something else you like and buy it as well.

    If the brick-and-mortar stores are getting rid of rebates, they're going to have a very hard time competing with their online rivals unless they start having clowns and free hot-dog days. Or dropping prices. Frankly, I couldn't care one way or the other. I haven't bought an electronics item from a "real" store since 1995.

    1. Re:News for you: we're getting the deal. by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      Well, if you don't care one way or the other that's fine with me. But I resent those who actually complain to stores like CompUSA to drop the rebates when there in no proof that the lower prices will ever come. If you can find good low prices at retail stores as a result of dropping rebates, please let me know (if you find clowns and hot dogs please don't bother me, and my local Best Buy already has plenty of clowns). Sure, I would rather pay $50 less than have to send in my paperwork and wait for my own money for a disk or monitor, or to pay tax on the extra. But I do want to still be able to buy from a local retailer. You may be happy with on-line sales, but I find too many on-line retailers try to make the shipping and "handling charges" (whatever the hell handling charges are) a profit center that quickly eats away from any pretend savings on the item cost. And too many on-line retailers even charge their inflated shipping charges item-by-item, even if you order multiple things or even more than one of the same item (I'm not naming names, but Egghead). And I've had too many on-line retailers completely unresponsive to customers complaints (I'm not naming names, but Geeks.com) I don't want to have to order heavy items like computer cases from on-line sources and then see my saving eaten in shipping and mystery charges, and I sure don't want to deal with it when the item arrives abused in shipping. I rarely have to return anything (although some of that may be form seeing what I'm buying and not having the mail order people misrepresent things), but if I do I want to be able to deal with someone face to face, not have to drive the package top the post office, pay to ship it back, and then hope I can get the on-line seller to give me a refund on the part of the cost that was the item price (yea, that overcharge for "handling" is already lost).

      Sure,it would be absolutely fantastic if the physical retailers dropped prices rather than have us play with rebates. But I have absolutely not seen it happening. You can use fuzzy logic to say that gee, it should happen. But all signs are that, if anything, the opposite is happening. Particularly in the case of OfficeMAx. I've seen many of the things that they now claim are "Great Deals, NO REBATE NEEDED". But when I look at the price of some of them I see that they are selling the product for more than I've paid for the same thing at other stores even before I sent in my rebates! Yes, that's right, I could buy it elsewhere with a rabate deal and not even send in the rebate and still pay less than at OfficeMax with their "No Rebate" price. Where in the world is the savings?

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    2. Re:News for you: we're getting the deal. by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Well, if you don't care one way or the other that's fine with me. But I resent those who actually complain to stores like CompUSA to drop the rebates when there in no proof that the lower prices will ever come.

      They may come, they may not. I tend to "try" to find a good deal without a rebate first, and only fall back on the rebate if it's an extraordinary deal, and i'm not out extra pocket money as a result.

      Sure, I would rather pay $50 less than have to send in my paperwork and wait for my own money for a disk or monitor, or to pay tax on the extra. But I do want to still be able to buy from a local retailer. You may be happy with on-line sales, but I find too many on-line retailers try to make the shipping and "handling charges" (whatever the hell handling charges are) a profit center that quickly eats away from any pretend savings on the item cost.

      FYI, a Handling Fee is just that, a fee to handle, box, and send it to be shipped. In other cases, the handling fee is actually the premium a drop shipper charges to take the order which then in turn gets shipped out elsewhere, a place known as the warehouse. Still in other cases, it's that hidden fee so they can advertise a extraordinary low price. For example memory, it does not take an extra box, nor extra packing material, nor extra labor to grab two sticks of memory and shove in a box yet there were some places that would charge $10.00 plus $10.00 and before you knew it you had $50 in shipping and handling fees for something weighing in at under a pound. Could still be a fair price.

      If this offends you shop a place which doesn't have horrible handling fees. As with the case of rebates we, at the end of the day, vote with our dollars. I made a choice to shop at places who made it clear what the shipping and handling fee would be before I placed an order, and better yet not charge astronomical prices for handling. I think others did too and you can see to day if you shop www.pricewatch.com that the page one companies are offering free shipping for memory. There is no evidence this saves you money, but at the very least you know what the damn price is.

      That's the complaint about rebates from hell. I can look in today's Office Max flyer and see 50 spindles of 16X DVDs from HP cost $14.99, 100 packs $27.99. Office Depot has Memorex 100 spindles for $29.99. Best buy charges more for Memorex, but has the Verbatim - 16X for $14.99 for a 50 pack. I can see clearly if I was in the market for these discs that there are three options floating at about 30c/disc, and shopping Newegg would cost me more for the same stuff, as their best price is TDK for $30/100 pack and shipping is $7.70. This doesn't metter to me as I buy printables, printable TDK at costco are about $40 for a 100 pack. But if I needed non printables today I could see it's a good time to buy them local. But the price on DVDs bounces between 20c and 50c per localy, and if I was trully lazy I could order from newegg and get a consistent price. Granted a couple days ago Newegg had Verbiums for $30 and a $10 rebate, which is not only no extra cash out of pocket as it's free shipping, but there is a chance to save $10.00.

      But just like you don't like handling fees, I am not fond the "rebate pile from hell". Manufacturer rebates are not so bad, but when you get the manufacturer rebate, the store rebate, bonus store rebate for buying a group of things, like PC monitor and printer. The printer is always the thimble sized class the likes of which you wouldn't want to purchace anyway, the monitor is always a tube likely no better or no worse than what you already own, and all of this extra trouble to say what, $50 on the PC? It's no wonder people are taking these deals, fetching the rebates, and returning the surplus for the price that's reflected on the sales receipt, either that or selling the stuff on e-bay.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  71. Convince me Rebates aren't mail fraud when... by SockPuppet_9_5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Convince me Rebates aren't mail fraud when there's two separate rebates I'm applying for, both go to the same street address in Detroit, one is through Best Buy that claims (on the online rebate info site for the item) that the rebate is good through a certain date, but ON ONLY ONE OF THEM the rebate submission has to be filed within 30 days of buying the product AND that they can void the rebate submission (for a late submission) without one single response back to the customer. Mind you, this is for a rebate that is still in effect at the store as I type this. At the store, it's "Rebate good through July 15, 2006" but in the fine print it's "30 days after you buy this, the rebate better be in the mail or else"

    and the other item is for an item that has absolutely no stipulation on when you send it the rebate, so long as it's before a certain drop dead date, which follows the end of the rebate. No sliding scale of when they can cut off the rebate allowance.

    To the same rebate management company out of Detroit.

    One rebate is for $75 and one is for $100.

    It's the Best Buy that allows for this extra rule that allows the rebate management folks to cut off more potential rebators.

    No, this is tantamount to mail fraud on the part of the rebate management/retailers part.

    The rules between rebates AREN'T consistant from rebate to rebate, and since we're sending all this correspondance through the mail, it needs better regulation. Why? Again,
    "Late, incomplete, postage-due, or illegible claims will be rejected; their senders may not be notified."

    In another case last year, Newegg sold out of the item that had a rebate by the time I was shipped the item. Guess what disspears from Newegg.com when they don't have anymore of that item for sale? Yep. Finding THAT particular form took days and days, contacting Newegg, the manufacturer, all that. It took two weeks contacting and recontacting the manufacturer because nobody at that place was actually responsible for that. What was the eventual reply? "Go ahead and send it with the form for the lower priced rebate, and they'll figure it out."
    Guess what never came? That rebate! Who do I complain to? I have got nobody to complain to.

    Someone, somewhere is making money by refusing rebate checks.

    Until you've been screwed out of a rebate, you're not a believer.

  72. Another aspect to the rebate scam by vince1 · · Score: 1

    I would certainly be happy to see the market move away from this nasty rebate trend.

    In addition to all the subtle technicalities that have already been mentioned that cause many people to never get their rebates, there is another part of the scam that most people don't seem to notice.

    Often, you must forfeit your right to return an item in order to get the rebate. Most merchants allow you to return merchandise within 14 to 30 days for a full refund as long as it is intact in the original packaging. Look close at the rebate deadlines. I find that most of them are so short that you must mail in the rebate within just a few days or maybe a week or two of the purchase date. However, they require cutting out the original UPC code from the box or packaging to send in with it. Of course, once you have done that, you either will not have the option of returning the item for a refund or, at best, will be charged a 15% or 20% re-stocking fee.

    If the rebate does not give you more than 30 days from the purchase date to send it in, then you know it is a deliberate scam.

  73. An Idea by photomonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would seem to me that Office Max just got a whole bunch of people to flock to their stores to see what could be had 'rebate-free'. I'm betting that for one clever reason or another, most of the big ticket items are still pretty heavily reliant on mail-ins. I'll also bet that at least some of the mindless shopping masses walking into OfficeMax will quickly forget what they went in for, and will walk out with one or a few items they otherwise wouldn'tve purchased. PR mission accomplished.

    --
    Message contains 1 attachment: spam.gif
  74. I have a better idea... by dbatkins · · Score: 1

    Hows about we stop buying a bunch of crap we really don't need? No rebates for crap that's gonna sit around on my desk and make my house look like the set of Sanford & Son.

    --
    I used to be with IT..now IT seems strange and scary to me.
  75. Which is bound to only push prices up? by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Rebates are good if you are organized and disciplined.

    I've only ever had one go missing, and i could live without the 8 dollars.

    This will surely end up costing me more :/

  76. About time by JayTech · · Score: 1

    About time they did it... glad to see they have no reason to deny rebates now. Can't wait for black Friday! OT: wasn't this story already posted before? Q: Pete and Repeat were in a boat. Pete got out. Who was left? A: *REPEAT* Pete and Repeat were in a...

  77. Does anyone take finiance courses or economics? by slashdotmos · · Score: 0

    OK lets do some real simple math. Buyer: Printer = $200 - $20 instant - $50 rebate = $130 end cost (+taxes, etc) Oh but I hate rebates so I want it for the $130 out the door. Now to brake it down why you had to pay the $180 out the door with a $50 rebate and not $130 out the door. Store: Printer cost from supplier $175, cost to run the store for the day $1000 (employees, utilities, lease, etc). So if we only sold printers for $200 that cost us $175 we make $25 each sale. So to beak even for the day we would have to sell 40 printers a day. Now with the sale we only make $5 on the printer out the door so that would make us sell 200 a day to break even. Oh but the rebate! Rebate: $180 - $50 = $130 Store: $130 - $175 = $-45 So the store just lost $45 by selling the printer for less than it had to buy it from the suplier for. So if each sale nets a loss, then it can not ever recover its costs and thus cant pay the bills. But with the Rebate system, the Store can earn intrest on the $5 they still made durring the sale. This will help offset the loss they will take for having a 'good deal'. But most times they will never fully recover the cost. It is in a sense, a loss leader, to try to get you into the store to buy other non-sale items. Now most rebates come from the supplier not the store. Most stores have instant savings or instant rebates. Thus the -$20 sale price, that is the store putting it on sale to a point that they still make a lil money on the sale and hope to get your buisness. So when it is the store having the huge rebate they have to have a way to recoup the costs. In the end you will not see hardly any huge great deals with a no rebate system. Why would I want to in a sense pay you to shop my store and walk out with a printer? We are here to make money not give things away. So if the extra money sits in the bank and earns intrest so we hope to still make a proffit while at the same time selling you an item for less than we bought it for, what is the harm in that?

  78. Hmm....you have some funky math by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    Defense is about a quarter of the federal budget, or about an eighth of the total government (state and local spend roughly equal to the feds). If we could cut that eighth by half, we would be spending about as much as those non-war-mongering Europeans. Of course, then no one would be there to protect them...

    Yes, government is wasteful, but not THAT wasteful. In any case, most of the waste occurs before they get your money (because you and everyone else bends over backwards to avoid having to pay, which is a waste of time and resources that goes unaccounted). I would be interested in knowing by what standard you judge our society corrupt - I would argue that it is one of the least-corrupt societies in history.

  79. Now if you could just find me that $10/night by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    campground in Chicago, me and my gf my have a good time on our vacation there. Buying used stuff does not mean that you are escaping the companies...you are just one step removed, and still dependent on them. I am willing to bet that you used 50 items containing or produced with products from my company in the last week, even though you probably have no idea who we are. Actually, your computer and car almost certainly contain several such materials.

    Strange that I never have a problem with "hidden fees" - which inevitably means "I was too lazy to read fees". Yes, you pay taxes at a hotel...where do you think the water comes from? the streets? the cops?

  80. Of course, when everything is included like by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    that, people quickly unlearn what the taxes are. Quick question - what is the sales tax in your state? Now, what is the gasoline tax? Odds are just about every middle-school student can answer the first one, but few people can answer the last one. European governments need to hide their ridiculous taxes, so they bury them in the price.

    If you think someone is actually selling flights for a euro, you DESERVE to get scammed.

  81. Not All Rebates are bad, but.. by avaric3 · · Score: 1

    Too many are. I have never had a problem with BJ's online rebates. No receipts to mail in, no UPC's to cut out. Just fill out your info at their website and wait 2-3 weeks. Of course, those rebates were for only $5 so even if the rebate never did come in it would be no big loss.

    Now mail-in rebates are another story. Those who say that only morons who don't fill the form correctly, don't get the rebates are lucky. Those who fault the consumer for not hounding the company to get their rebate must be unemployed.

    A couple of years ago, I bought an HP monitor with a $50 mail in. I sent all the stuff in and kept copies. The fullfillment company had one of those online tracking sites, so I would check it from time to time. I saw the status go from received to processing and there it stayed. Eight weeks came and went and my rebate was still "processing". Now it was coming on 3 months, so I gave the customer service number a call. Calls were accepted only between the hours of 8 and 4 and calling after 3:30 was futile since I would be on hold until 4:00 and then disconnected. I finally had to make time to call during my lunch and finally got through after about a 20 minute hold time! Did I mention that I was wasting my lunch time with this. Apparently there was some data entry error on their end.. The rep had me confirm my info while he re-entered it. I would receive it in 2-3 weeks. I finally got it. Four months after I had made my purchase and after I spent roughly an hour making several calls. If I had not called and spent time out of my work day, I would not have received it.

    My other experience was with Tiger Direct (crooks). It was for a $30 rebate on ram. I submitted all the info and of course made photocopies. I filed the copies away and sent the rebate off. Once again, I tracked the rebate online this time through ONRebate. After about 10 weeks and still no rebate, I e-mailed the onrebate support. No answer. So I called. Again we have the limited call times and of course waiting until after work means that no one will answer and I will get disconnected at 4:00 on the dot, so again I have to make time during work to call. After a 25 minute hold time I get in contact with a rep who states that I did not receive it because I did not send the UPC. This is of course bullshit, I have the photocopy to prove that I sent it. He says no problem, "just fax it attention to me" and we will take care of it. So now I have to get my stuff together and find a fax machine. I fax it and then nothing. I get no replies via e-mail and the status has not changed. I make one last call after work and am unable to get through so at this point I figure $30 is not worth this aggravation so I let it go. I know that I will never buy anything from Tiger Direct. If any of you are contemplating buying something there with a rebate don't do it. Read around. You'll see that I am hardly the only one who did not get a rebate from them. What they are doing is illegal and they should be prosecuted.

    So please, those of you who say only morons don't receive rebates, please explain what I should have done differently. I am glad that Office Max is phasing out rebates. It is a crooked business and I have little doubt that fulfillment companies throw out a percentage of legitimate rebates in the hopes that most consumers will provide little or no resistance.

  82. rebate = compensation for 10 min of your time by rfunches · · Score: 1
    Rebates are a tax on stupidity and laziness.

    Those who actually file for and receive their rebate checks would beg to differ. You certainly can't get rebates successfully if you're stupid and lazy. Rebates are really a tax on those who choose not to be penny-pinchers.

    People fall for those schemes, which assume your time, effort, postage, privacy and personal information are worth less than the rebate amount. It's really sad to see people pander to a scheme that is clearly false and misleading advertising.

    It's only a scheme (and mail fraud) if the processor doesn't hold to their end of the bargain (get my info, confirm I'm not filing more than once or whatever the limit is, ensure the UPC and receipt are included and correct). Filing a rebate should take no more than ten minutes; for a $10 rebate (once I recently filed for) I'd have to assume my time is worth nearly $60/hr before deciding that the rebate isn't worth my time. $10 for 10 minutes worth of work is very good compensation. Those marketing companies already have my personal info and I can't retract it, so moot point. The only time it's misleading is publishing the after-rebate price larger or before the at-checkout price; I fail to see how any advertised rebate is "clearly false...advertising."

    It's good that OfficeMax finally dropped this scheme, but you know they only did so because they got tired of upset customers harassing them looking for rebate checks that never showed up. So don't think for a minute this corporation is listening to consumers' demands in favor of profitability. It obviously became less profitable to mislead consumers than not, so they dropped the program.

    I think failure to uphold the deal has been more exception than the rule. Only once did I have to haggle with a rebate company for an error on their side, and quite a few here on /. have had no problems over the years. If you don't do things like write clearly, clearly circle the date, item, and price on the receipt, clip or tape the UPC (and verify it's correct to begin with) to the paperwork, you are giving the processor outs for delaying or denying a rebate.

    The people who demanded that retailers stop offering mail-in rebates are the lazy ones. You want the lowest possible price without having to do anything, and at the same time criticize those who are willing to do something extra for a lower price. How does that work?

  83. I don't buy anything with a mail-in rebate. by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

    I have no intention of trying to collect another mail-in rebate. It's a pain, I'm lazy, and, frankly, I don't really want to tell these companies my contact information. So, if I see an item that's, for example, "$100 (after $20 mail-in rebate)" the message I get is that the company feels people won't buy the item at $120. $120 is too much. They want people to buy it, thinking it costs $100. But since I'm not going to send in the rebate, my price will be $120. Even if I would have considered $120 a fair price before I saw the rebate, I now think of that item as overpriced at $120. So no sale.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  84. Weigh it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There comes a point where you have to buy either service or cheapness. When you buy something cheap expect bad service. It may not come as a suprise that companies budget the quality of customer service they give their customers. It comes out of your purchase price. If you want more service, pay more to the good place than the one working out of a warehouse/garage somewhere.

    Also we should should weigh our option of being cheap. Consider the following:

    You cheap because then you can buy more things at once to become happy.
    (Also means you dont have to work as hard in life to get the things you want.) It ends up making you unhappy (and unproductive in your life) because you refuse to pay more for good service

    Maybe if you weren't so cheap you would be happier and more productive! Then you can improve your life so you can afford to buy the amount of things that you want to keep your material lifestyle going. Then if you arent so unhappy you wont go home and (verbally) abuse your loved ones and yourself.

    Or you can just face the fact that your lifestyle itself is flawed.

  85. I'd call it a scam by BeaverCleaver · · Score: 1

    90 days my hairy white arse. I'm still waiting for my $150 for a product I bought in January. I reckon it would be a laugh to mail the CEO a big shit sealed in an envelope. Would this get me my rebate? Nope. But it would restore balance in the universe....

  86. Note To Konica Minolta by The+Patient · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the surprisingly timely processing of my $100US rebate on the printer, via Future Shop. But if you're going to continue asking people to mail stuff in, how about instead of requiring them to cut fairly sizeable rodent doors into both ends of that nice box, you tuck a little piece of paper with the UPC (or two, if it's THAT crucial) into the owner's manual, and let them send that in instead?

  87. Certified Mail by kenb215 · · Score: 1

    Has anybody tried using Certified Mail to make sure that the rebate company gets you submition? Do they even allow this, or do they just block it in their terms?

    1. Re:Certified Mail by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      It's been about 9 months since I've sent my last Mail in Rebate. Still waiting for that lamp assembly Benq!

      Oh, and they disconnected their Rebate phone line.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  88. Re:OfficeMax isn't the only one. Best buy IS dropp by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Why does it take so long just to put honest prices on the products? Don't they have a list of what the prices are? I bet there are even new products coming in during this time.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  89. Re:OfficeMax isn't the only one. Best buy IS dropp by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    They may have certain contracts that don't expire until then.