The problem is that Apple and Google let developers set the prices and then take a cut of the proceeds. If the price is too high few apps are sold and if the price is low then they get a smaller cut on a larger number of downloads. What Amazon is doing is basically screwing developers over.
The developer will suggest a price and then if Amazon chooses to go with it they get only 20% of the proceeds allowing Amazon to keep 80% of the money. Whereas if Amazon chooses a different price then the developer gets to keep 70% and Amazon keeps 30%.
Any guesses as to what's going to happen most often? Seems to me like this is a case of Amazon wanting to one up Apple at the dick the developers over game. I think it's going to burn them.
You do realize that they let you disable it, right? Probably the easiest way is to right click on the menu bar and uncheck the option for tabs on top. Personally, it isn't something that seems to have changed, but that might just be an XP thing.
They apparently made a mistake. But at least they're not releasing a final release that's buggy and not working properly. I've been using the betas for a while now and they've gotten a lot better, not that the first betas were that bad.
Is that logic, or is that training? The reason I ask is that the only reason I dislike it at the moment, apart from it blocking the favorites star, is that I look to the bottom of the screen. In a sense it probably is a more logical place since it's right next to all the buttons.
Since security is often times 3rd party, that's not likely to work out like that. More likely what would happen is that you'd have to prove that you owned the materials that you're taking out of the building.
Strikes me as an excellent way to blame the staff for vulnerabilities. Citrix isn't going to solve all of the problems, and it's definitely not going to solve the problem of keyloggers.
Additionally, 3 years is a really long time, it's not uncommon for a person to average less time than that without ever being fired.
That used to be quite common back before the labor movement really kicked off. It was common for coal miners to live in company housing, buy things from the company store, including the tools and gear necessary to complete their jobs. It was also typically arranged in such a way that the cost of the gear was always a bit more than the wages preventing any employee from ever managing to pay off the debt.
This isn't going to cause that to happen, but it is one step in that direction and in my view it definitely requires a significant amount of justification to even consider it.
Re:I am confident this thread won't become a flame
on
Bastardi's Wager
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
You really should be linking to NASA as well. They're the other major body that studies climate change. And it's likely one of the reasons why it's always being targeted for budget cuts by the GOP. A lot of what NASA does is keeping tabs on changes going on our planet from space.
The problem is that if he gets lucky and wins the bet, that will be viewed as a sign of validity to the nutters out there that don't believe that climate change is happening and will likely be severe in the future.
That's a bit different. Engineers have to have a pretty good handle on at least classical mechanics in order to do their jobs, and as such, it doesn't seem too unreasonable for them to win sometimes.
But, with climatology versus meteorology there's very little overlap there. Meteorology is focused on what's going to happen in the next year if even that far out. Whereas climatologists are looking at what things are likely to be like decades down the road. A time period of only a decade is hardly something that they'd be concerned with. Indeed if we were looking at only a single decade of climate change it would have to be a pretty drastic change to mean much of anything.
It doesn't matter what he wants, I have a sneaking suspicion that most Americans want the Patriot act. Now whether that means that they understand the implications or not is a completely different issue. I've run into a number of otherwise sensible and intelligent people who seem to be completely lacking in the spine department. You're not going to override fear with facts, it just doesn't work that way.
The reason why they won't be elected is because most Americans, for better or for worse, happen to think that the Patriot Act is a splendid idea if somebody tells them that it will make them safe.
If it were just a matter of the political elite that was stirring this up there would be a revolution. The problem is that a lot of people seem to like to have the high power distance structures which have marked American society for generations, and they are scared to actually have full access to the things that America has to offer.
Rep Boehner is satisfied with the records that have been shown that President Obama was born in Hawaii sometime after it was admitted into the union. So, I'm not really sure how anybody that claims otherwise isn't some sort of right wing nutjob and or bigot.
I was wondering something along the same lines. Since when is anybody working at Trend Micro an expert on security. I don't think I've ever used a security product so incompetently built as PC-Cillin. And I only used that in the sense that it came pre-installed on my laptop for the few seconds before it was removed for using 99% of my processing power.
Any time wasted is not available for other uses. Yes, it's only 10 seconds, but it does add up over time. Plus, unless it took a ridiculous amount of time, I'm not sure I see any reason not to do it. Plus systems that boot fast tend to be less bloated.
It's not really a separate issue as nobody can provide the support without paying the license. Meaning that without a substantial user base willing to pay, the support isn't provided. I'm not sure exactly how that isn't a failure to interoperate due to an inability to pay.
Third, for those with some sort of sensitivity to RF (or perceived sensitivity), you're flooding them with, well, light. At much lower intensities than the light fixture is already putting out. If they're concerned about exposure to that, allow them to wear a fedora at work. Problem solved.
What about people with light sensitivities? Generally fluorescent lights aren't to bad when placed in pairs, but when you get odd numbers of light tubes and flickering, that does seem to cause trouble for some folks.
It's not a crime the same way that picking locks isn't a crime. But that doesn't mean that if you're the one picking the locks that the cops are going to consider you an innocent bystander either. Legally, Amazon might be in the right for looking the other way as people do this, but that doesn't mean that they aren't going to suffer the consequences when/if somebody uses their equipment to break the law.
Technically speaking, they would be in for conspiracy. Allowing it because they aren't monitoring the use would probably be alright, but encouraging it would definitely make them liable, at least in part, for any criminal acts that they're involved with.
Not for a computer. You could just load it up with statistical data about letter correlation and famous quotes and phrases. Then spend a few seconds parsing through it. Sure you wouldn't likely have a computer be able to answer a puzzle with only 1 letter, but it's a lot easier to computerize the solution than Jeopardy with its word play and cheeky answers.
Slashdot Mirror
Or perhaps bigots could focus on solving the actual problem and go after the companies that hire them.
The problem is that Apple and Google let developers set the prices and then take a cut of the proceeds. If the price is too high few apps are sold and if the price is low then they get a smaller cut on a larger number of downloads. What Amazon is doing is basically screwing developers over.
The developer will suggest a price and then if Amazon chooses to go with it they get only 20% of the proceeds allowing Amazon to keep 80% of the money. Whereas if Amazon chooses a different price then the developer gets to keep 70% and Amazon keeps 30%.
Any guesses as to what's going to happen most often? Seems to me like this is a case of Amazon wanting to one up Apple at the dick the developers over game. I think it's going to burn them.
Not on XP, unless there's some sort of a bug, the position hasn't changed.
You do realize that they let you disable it, right? Probably the easiest way is to right click on the menu bar and uncheck the option for tabs on top. Personally, it isn't something that seems to have changed, but that might just be an XP thing.
They apparently made a mistake. But at least they're not releasing a final release that's buggy and not working properly. I've been using the betas for a while now and they've gotten a lot better, not that the first betas were that bad.
Is that logic, or is that training? The reason I ask is that the only reason I dislike it at the moment, apart from it blocking the favorites star, is that I look to the bottom of the screen. In a sense it probably is a more logical place since it's right next to all the buttons.
Depends on your definition of rampant, we do have a lot of organized crime in the US, but it's not anywhere near as bad as it is in Russia.
So sort of like a Social Security card except without the promise of only using it for one thing.
Since security is often times 3rd party, that's not likely to work out like that. More likely what would happen is that you'd have to prove that you owned the materials that you're taking out of the building.
Strikes me as an excellent way to blame the staff for vulnerabilities. Citrix isn't going to solve all of the problems, and it's definitely not going to solve the problem of keyloggers.
Additionally, 3 years is a really long time, it's not uncommon for a person to average less time than that without ever being fired.
That used to be quite common back before the labor movement really kicked off. It was common for coal miners to live in company housing, buy things from the company store, including the tools and gear necessary to complete their jobs. It was also typically arranged in such a way that the cost of the gear was always a bit more than the wages preventing any employee from ever managing to pay off the debt.
This isn't going to cause that to happen, but it is one step in that direction and in my view it definitely requires a significant amount of justification to even consider it.
You really should be linking to NASA as well. They're the other major body that studies climate change. And it's likely one of the reasons why it's always being targeted for budget cuts by the GOP. A lot of what NASA does is keeping tabs on changes going on our planet from space.
The problem is that if he gets lucky and wins the bet, that will be viewed as a sign of validity to the nutters out there that don't believe that climate change is happening and will likely be severe in the future.
That's a bit different. Engineers have to have a pretty good handle on at least classical mechanics in order to do their jobs, and as such, it doesn't seem too unreasonable for them to win sometimes.
But, with climatology versus meteorology there's very little overlap there. Meteorology is focused on what's going to happen in the next year if even that far out. Whereas climatologists are looking at what things are likely to be like decades down the road. A time period of only a decade is hardly something that they'd be concerned with. Indeed if we were looking at only a single decade of climate change it would have to be a pretty drastic change to mean much of anything.
It doesn't matter what he wants, I have a sneaking suspicion that most Americans want the Patriot act. Now whether that means that they understand the implications or not is a completely different issue. I've run into a number of otherwise sensible and intelligent people who seem to be completely lacking in the spine department. You're not going to override fear with facts, it just doesn't work that way.
The reason why they won't be elected is because most Americans, for better or for worse, happen to think that the Patriot Act is a splendid idea if somebody tells them that it will make them safe.
If it were just a matter of the political elite that was stirring this up there would be a revolution. The problem is that a lot of people seem to like to have the high power distance structures which have marked American society for generations, and they are scared to actually have full access to the things that America has to offer.
Rep Boehner is satisfied with the records that have been shown that President Obama was born in Hawaii sometime after it was admitted into the union. So, I'm not really sure how anybody that claims otherwise isn't some sort of right wing nutjob and or bigot.
I was wondering something along the same lines. Since when is anybody working at Trend Micro an expert on security. I don't think I've ever used a security product so incompetently built as PC-Cillin. And I only used that in the sense that it came pre-installed on my laptop for the few seconds before it was removed for using 99% of my processing power.
Any time wasted is not available for other uses. Yes, it's only 10 seconds, but it does add up over time. Plus, unless it took a ridiculous amount of time, I'm not sure I see any reason not to do it. Plus systems that boot fast tend to be less bloated.
It's not really a separate issue as nobody can provide the support without paying the license. Meaning that without a substantial user base willing to pay, the support isn't provided. I'm not sure exactly how that isn't a failure to interoperate due to an inability to pay.
I'm guessing that if they aren't careful sunlight is going to be a problem. On the plus side though, tinted windows would block the signal.
Third, for those with some sort of sensitivity to RF (or perceived sensitivity), you're flooding them with, well, light. At much lower intensities than the light fixture is already putting out. If they're concerned about exposure to that, allow them to wear a fedora at work. Problem solved.
What about people with light sensitivities? Generally fluorescent lights aren't to bad when placed in pairs, but when you get odd numbers of light tubes and flickering, that does seem to cause trouble for some folks.
It's not a crime the same way that picking locks isn't a crime. But that doesn't mean that if you're the one picking the locks that the cops are going to consider you an innocent bystander either. Legally, Amazon might be in the right for looking the other way as people do this, but that doesn't mean that they aren't going to suffer the consequences when/if somebody uses their equipment to break the law.
Technically speaking, they would be in for conspiracy. Allowing it because they aren't monitoring the use would probably be alright, but encouraging it would definitely make them liable, at least in part, for any criminal acts that they're involved with.
Not for a computer. You could just load it up with statistical data about letter correlation and famous quotes and phrases. Then spend a few seconds parsing through it. Sure you wouldn't likely have a computer be able to answer a puzzle with only 1 letter, but it's a lot easier to computerize the solution than Jeopardy with its word play and cheeky answers.