The GP is correct, rather than actually try to do something about the child molesters, he opted to blame gay priests for it. Personally, I don't respect a religious leader that seems to think that it's OK to make political hay out of people that have been sexually abused.
Rather than just admit what everybody else knows, that the Catholic Church was encouraging and supporting known child molesters in their organization. It's not something that is at this point under any meaningful question, it's pretty well established, it's just an issue of exactly how bad is it. Owning up to it with some steps to eliminate the problem in the future would likely have gained him a lot of respect.
Even if one did buy the concept of gay priests molesting children, then how the fuck does he explain priests molesting girls?
You can do a lot if you're changing the instruction set that drastically. The AMD and Intel processors in use today include a lot of kludge from previous revisions which are necessary for backwards compatibility. I don't think that you need an emulator for the processor bit until you get at least to the 386 and probably not till earlier revisions. You can still run DOS on modern hardware if you wish, you mostly just don't get all the features or the RAM.
Dumb move. I kind of wanted one, but if they've nixed the crank, then what's the point. I know that they get really good battery life, but I thought a part of the point of it was not needing to plug them in.
No, I'm implying that nobody can foresee whether they'll need food stamps in the future. The service you're paying for is insurance. As long as people pay the taxes the program will be there. Anybody could get seriously ill and wind up homeless. When I had a heat stroke last summer, the bill for that was $14k, fortunately I had insurance which meant I only had to pay a small fraction, otherwise I likely would have had to either default on the debt or be homeless.
Additionally, citation need for the bureaucracy. People on the right make that sort of assertion regularly, but are never able to cut it, even when the GOP controls both houses and the White House.
That may be, but standards shouldn't require you to pay for them. Just look at Flash, when I was using FreeBSD exclusively, one of the only things I missed was Flash for sites that didn't provide an alternative means of browsing the site.
Chrome doesn't have the market share to warrant antitrust investigations is the difference. Now, when they kill h.264 on Youtube, that might spark an investigation. Doubtful seeing as the product they're pushing is free. Unless they raise the price on WebM later on, I suspect that they're in the clear.
No, they'll be forced to upgrade because MPEG-LA isn't willing to provide the use of h.264 for free. It's their right to charge for it, but that doesn't mean that we should be required to pay in order to use video on the web.
Seriously, are you this dense or are you trolling?
I seriously doubt that Google would be bothering with this if they weren't concerned with losing eyeballs due to some browsers not supporting the format and some platforms being left completely out of it.
They don't have to pay, they could move to another country. It's hardly theft for the government to make you pay for services you use. Why should I have to pay all my taxes when these jack asses are sending their money overseas to avoid having to pay taxes?
But then again, I bet you're one of those people who wants your taxes cut, but wants somebody elses services to be cut or diminished to finance it. I think the term for that is "fiscal conservative."
They can't, it's fraud. Technically they can do it without it being fraud, however they would have to post on every profile that was scraped that it was scraped and the amount of disclosure required in general would make it impossible to have a viable site.
True, however they would be committing fraud unless they were extremely careful about how they do it. As in posting prominently on every single page that the profile isn't for a member, but is comprised of information that was scraped.
And they'd also be liable for any stalking that occurs as a result. Sure they might have found all this information in publicly accessible ways, but it's not likely that there are many people trolling the internet putting together information from random sites to figure out who they want to stalk.
And lastly, there's the issue of copyright infringement. They don't have permission to redistribute those photos. People generally only assigning permission to a site to distribute them directly, not to the people that are viewing or possibly downloading them. Meaning that any photos on the site are almost certain to be infringing on somebody's copyright.
More than that, this would definitely be fraud unless they're extremely careful. And that's assuming that the records are correct. In order to get around that they'd pretty much have to advertise specifically which records were scraped and I think at that point people would see that 99% of them were scraped and decide to go somewhere less creepy. Even if there is a person there that looks interesting, only an idiot would risk the restraining order to contact them.
It's despicable even if they do make it obvious which profiles were autogenerated. Given that a lot of those sources aren't opt in, I don't think that they should be allowed to exploit the data without expressed consent.
Additionally this makes the FB practices look almost benign rather than the typical extremely creepy.
You do realize that Xfce has been around since 1996, right? It's hardly a new addition, personally I like it.
Re:What functionality are we BSD users ...
on
Xfce 4.8 Released
·
· Score: 2
From the looks of it, some of the dependencies haven't been ported to FreeBSD yet. Such as xfconf, xfdesktop and garcon. Which would account for the loss of features, but OTOH it doesn't look like that big of a deal in the long term. From the looks of it they'll be ported as the changes were made with some concern for not making it Linux only.
I suspect that a lot of people didn't. I personally didn't until relatively recently, it's just that I'm opposed to posting that sort of information about myself online in general.
Because it seems to often block the star when I need to know if I've bookmarked the site. Usually because I end up on another link after I get to the page.
Personally, I'd rather they gave us the option of having the status bar right below the URL bar along with the addons bar. That way you don't have to look all the way down to the bottom to see it.
It's funny how such a minor detail when they decided to put the status bar down there has become a pain years later when it requires physically moving your head to see.
That only covers broadcasting, it doesn't cover the encoding or decoding of the stream. So, they're basically letting you stream the media for free as long as you use a licensed implementation on either end. Plus, they require you to have a license for each individual software product rather than a blanket license to cover the computer.
Indeed, this is a slightly more complicated form of a relatively old experiment. A Class Divided
I'd surprised if the whole astrology business wasn't explained primarily by the same sort of phenomenon. Pretty much the only other possibilities are outright fraud and circadian rhythms. Not that it couldn't be a bit of all three.
Well, there's drugs coming in from Mexico and weapons going out to cartels in Mexico and on to wherever they're going. Illegal immigrants sneaking across the border is really the least of the concerns for most people. In practice they aren't stealing jobs that Americans actually want, it's mostly crap jobs that even during the current recession are going unfilled.
Or more likely the GOP wanted the project but wasn't willing to agree to pay the real cost and as such decided to sign the contract and count on future administrations being afraid to cancel it. It's a common strategy used by both parties, it's really hard to cancel projects when a powerful Senator or Representative doesn't want it canceled.
I'd be very surprised if the original estimates were realistic without absolutely everything going as planned.
Slashdot Mirror
As much as I despise the way he got that money, I don't think that I can say with any degree of honesty, that I don't respect what he's doing with it.
The GP is correct, rather than actually try to do something about the child molesters, he opted to blame gay priests for it. Personally, I don't respect a religious leader that seems to think that it's OK to make political hay out of people that have been sexually abused.
Rather than just admit what everybody else knows, that the Catholic Church was encouraging and supporting known child molesters in their organization. It's not something that is at this point under any meaningful question, it's pretty well established, it's just an issue of exactly how bad is it. Owning up to it with some steps to eliminate the problem in the future would likely have gained him a lot of respect.
Even if one did buy the concept of gay priests molesting children, then how the fuck does he explain priests molesting girls?
Oh, great that's what we need. Flash games that require a physics accelerator.
You can do a lot if you're changing the instruction set that drastically. The AMD and Intel processors in use today include a lot of kludge from previous revisions which are necessary for backwards compatibility. I don't think that you need an emulator for the processor bit until you get at least to the 386 and probably not till earlier revisions. You can still run DOS on modern hardware if you wish, you mostly just don't get all the features or the RAM.
Dumb move. I kind of wanted one, but if they've nixed the crank, then what's the point. I know that they get really good battery life, but I thought a part of the point of it was not needing to plug them in.
No, I'm implying that nobody can foresee whether they'll need food stamps in the future. The service you're paying for is insurance. As long as people pay the taxes the program will be there. Anybody could get seriously ill and wind up homeless. When I had a heat stroke last summer, the bill for that was $14k, fortunately I had insurance which meant I only had to pay a small fraction, otherwise I likely would have had to either default on the debt or be homeless.
Additionally, citation need for the bureaucracy. People on the right make that sort of assertion regularly, but are never able to cut it, even when the GOP controls both houses and the White House.
That may be, but standards shouldn't require you to pay for them. Just look at Flash, when I was using FreeBSD exclusively, one of the only things I missed was Flash for sites that didn't provide an alternative means of browsing the site.
Chrome doesn't have the market share to warrant antitrust investigations is the difference. Now, when they kill h.264 on Youtube, that might spark an investigation. Doubtful seeing as the product they're pushing is free. Unless they raise the price on WebM later on, I suspect that they're in the clear.
No, they'll be forced to upgrade because MPEG-LA isn't willing to provide the use of h.264 for free. It's their right to charge for it, but that doesn't mean that we should be required to pay in order to use video on the web.
Seriously, are you this dense or are you trolling?
I seriously doubt that Google would be bothering with this if they weren't concerned with losing eyeballs due to some browsers not supporting the format and some platforms being left completely out of it.
They don't have to pay, they could move to another country. It's hardly theft for the government to make you pay for services you use. Why should I have to pay all my taxes when these jack asses are sending their money overseas to avoid having to pay taxes?
But then again, I bet you're one of those people who wants your taxes cut, but wants somebody elses services to be cut or diminished to finance it. I think the term for that is "fiscal conservative."
They can't, it's fraud. Technically they can do it without it being fraud, however they would have to post on every profile that was scraped that it was scraped and the amount of disclosure required in general would make it impossible to have a viable site.
True, however they would be committing fraud unless they were extremely careful about how they do it. As in posting prominently on every single page that the profile isn't for a member, but is comprised of information that was scraped.
And they'd also be liable for any stalking that occurs as a result. Sure they might have found all this information in publicly accessible ways, but it's not likely that there are many people trolling the internet putting together information from random sites to figure out who they want to stalk.
And lastly, there's the issue of copyright infringement. They don't have permission to redistribute those photos. People generally only assigning permission to a site to distribute them directly, not to the people that are viewing or possibly downloading them. Meaning that any photos on the site are almost certain to be infringing on somebody's copyright.
More than that, this would definitely be fraud unless they're extremely careful. And that's assuming that the records are correct. In order to get around that they'd pretty much have to advertise specifically which records were scraped and I think at that point people would see that 99% of them were scraped and decide to go somewhere less creepy. Even if there is a person there that looks interesting, only an idiot would risk the restraining order to contact them.
It's despicable even if they do make it obvious which profiles were autogenerated. Given that a lot of those sources aren't opt in, I don't think that they should be allowed to exploit the data without expressed consent.
Additionally this makes the FB practices look almost benign rather than the typical extremely creepy.
You do realize that Xfce has been around since 1996, right? It's hardly a new addition, personally I like it.
From the looks of it, some of the dependencies haven't been ported to FreeBSD yet. Such as xfconf, xfdesktop and garcon. Which would account for the loss of features, but OTOH it doesn't look like that big of a deal in the long term. From the looks of it they'll be ported as the changes were made with some concern for not making it Linux only.
I suspect that a lot of people didn't. I personally didn't until relatively recently, it's just that I'm opposed to posting that sort of information about myself online in general.
3.142 Street, Homeville is my address you insensitive clod.
Honestly, they'll probably just have to order in a prostitute or buy a fleshlight.
Because it seems to often block the star when I need to know if I've bookmarked the site. Usually because I end up on another link after I get to the page.
Personally, I'd rather they gave us the option of having the status bar right below the URL bar along with the addons bar. That way you don't have to look all the way down to the bottom to see it.
It's funny how such a minor detail when they decided to put the status bar down there has become a pain years later when it requires physically moving your head to see.
No, they haven't, at least not for XP, and there's a significant number of people still using it.
That only covers broadcasting, it doesn't cover the encoding or decoding of the stream. So, they're basically letting you stream the media for free as long as you use a licensed implementation on either end. Plus, they require you to have a license for each individual software product rather than a blanket license to cover the computer.
Indeed, this is a slightly more complicated form of a relatively old experiment. A Class Divided
I'd surprised if the whole astrology business wasn't explained primarily by the same sort of phenomenon. Pretty much the only other possibilities are outright fraud and circadian rhythms. Not that it couldn't be a bit of all three.
Well, there's drugs coming in from Mexico and weapons going out to cartels in Mexico and on to wherever they're going. Illegal immigrants sneaking across the border is really the least of the concerns for most people. In practice they aren't stealing jobs that Americans actually want, it's mostly crap jobs that even during the current recession are going unfilled.
Now, H-1B visas on the other hand...
Or more likely the GOP wanted the project but wasn't willing to agree to pay the real cost and as such decided to sign the contract and count on future administrations being afraid to cancel it. It's a common strategy used by both parties, it's really hard to cancel projects when a powerful Senator or Representative doesn't want it canceled.
I'd be very surprised if the original estimates were realistic without absolutely everything going as planned.