Depends on the AI of course. But in this instance best means the answer it would give if it was otherwise not attempting to have flaws -- and that isn't subjective.
The difference is if the AI actually knew it was making a non-best decision in order to seem more human or not. Appearing human (with flaws) is on a layer above the actual decision weighting/ranking layer and both above and below the morality layer.
It did say unlimited on AT&T. Infact up until last month when I finally switched off of unlimited, it was on every bill of mine as "Unlimited Data Plan". I switched because "Unlimited" meant I got 2GB of fast data then, everything after that was painfully slow (2G/Edge), and the 5GB plan was cheaper, and it did essentially the same thing. 5GB of LTE/4G, then I get throttled back to 2G/Edge.
I am suing the city because they posted a 45 MPH speed limit on main street and I hit traffic and I couldn't do 45 MPH. Oh, and an ambulance went by they were able to get through traffic faster than me. How dare the city limit my usage of the street!
First, if your site can't handle a hit every couple of seconds, you need to throw it away. Second, there is this little file called robots.txt that you should read about. With it, you can tell the spider how quickly it should crawl your site, and what parts it should crawl. With a sitemap, you can even tell it how often each page is likely to change.
Well, the same can be pretty much said about both the webkit and gecko engines as well. I actually have more outstanding bugs in those engines than I do edge or IE, and they typically take a lot longer to get fixed than in IE/Edge. Sure, I might be an outlier, but that is my personal experience. I had one bug in firefox that has been outstanding for nearly 10 years, and every once in a while I see someone play with it, only to be kicked down the road further. webkit is pretty much the same, until years go by and then they get closed as wont-fix even though they all have short simple examples, and have been verified to be actual bugs.
And I'm not an anonymous coward. I call out the BS as I see it.
My name isn't Joe, and I could secure our own network better. The awesome thing about the cloud is when someone higher up asks me to do something really stupid, I can just say no, we can't do that -- which keeps the network secure.
Actually, most spam doesn't come from broken Windows boxes any more and it hasn't been that way for a long time. Most spam comes from rooted linux servers these days. No spammer wants the old XP box running behind 128kbps DSL, they would much rather target the linux server sitting in a data center connected by multi-gigabit connections.
Only because you are already entrenched into an environment that has been tailored for that type of set up. Imagine having a Xbox/PS with next to no storage capacity where all (your) games are loaded directly from the cloud. How about an "unlimited" DVR where your DVR stores everything in the cloud? Full system backups to the cloud? How about moving your entire CPU/GPU to the cloud where what is rendered is set to you for displaying locally much like Nvidia was attempting with their grid architecture. You'd never have to buy another game console or PC ever again except if/when something revolutionary happens, and even then it would be 1/5th the price.
In short, local storage becomes much less desirable if you can get virtually unlimited storage at nearly the same speed as you could locally. Consumers would never need to buy another hard drive for any device. You would only need a small amount of storage to use possibly as a cache, and you would be better served by using an appropriately sized SSD for such a task.
Besides, Uber would probably only have to hire just a few extra people to monitor the news worldwide and enter a command to temporarily prevent rating spikes in emergency situations in a localized area.
You mean like:
Uber soon tweeted that they'd deactivated their surge pricing algorithm for the affected area
No. You can't really do that via most routers. You can only control your own router, and only packets you create can have to QoS you set. The ones coming from the internet don't have your QoS set.
I can tell you've never driven both a Tesla and a stingray. Telsa has a 50/50 weight distribution, and the stingray has a 49.5/50.5 (most still consider that 50/50) and has a lower center of gravity than the Tesla. The Telsa does 60-0 in 102 feet. The stingray in 97 feet. Tesla on lateral acceleration is 0.90g, while the stingray is 1.20g and that is a HUGE difference. The Tesla still handles like a sedan -- almost any current sporty car will do better than 0.90g.
Which is obviously why you got the Tesla. I went the other route, and don't regret it -- but Tesla was one on a short list when I got the stingray. However, I like tracking my car more than I like not paying for gas and the stingray handles better, brakes better, and looks better than the Tesla. But the Tesla uses no gas, and can seat 4/5 people, but I have another car for when I need to seat more than 2.
Teslas are nice cars, but they don't handle better, not by a long shot. Some of that is because of the battery packs, which leads to any tesla (P85D+) that can actually out accelerate my car (in a straight line and only up to ~110MPH at which point I out accelerate it, and pass it at ~140MPH) weighing more than 50% more than my car (corvette stingray). Unfortunately, tesla can't defy physics, and that means teslas have pretty poor handling. However, it is incredibly impressive for what it is -- a high tech 4 seater EV sedan.
Because it has been shown over and over that people with iPhones actually spend money, while those with androids don't. Sure, you only get 16-18% of the smartphone market (but that also includes Macs and the majority of tablet market), but those 16-18% iPhone users outspend the android users 20 to 1 (2000% more per user). So, overall if it's an iPhone exclusive, you make 250% more than if it was an android exclusive. You asked why, they are only following the money, which is what any good business man would do.
I grew up in the mid west, where winter temperatures frequently spend weeks in the below zero range - battery efficiency simply doesn't work well enough there... so cross off 1/3 of the country..
WHOA? I live in the mid west currently, and teslas are all over the place. They work just fine in the winter (albeit with slightly less range), but what's going from 320 mile range to 250 mile range when you are only drive ~40 miles?
Slashdot Mirror
Depends on the AI of course. But in this instance best means the answer it would give if it was otherwise not attempting to have flaws -- and that isn't subjective.
The difference is if the AI actually knew it was making a non-best decision in order to seem more human or not. Appearing human (with flaws) is on a layer above the actual decision weighting/ranking layer and both above and below the morality layer.
It did say unlimited on AT&T. Infact up until last month when I finally switched off of unlimited, it was on every bill of mine as "Unlimited Data Plan". I switched because "Unlimited" meant I got 2GB of fast data then, everything after that was painfully slow (2G/Edge), and the 5GB plan was cheaper, and it did essentially the same thing. 5GB of LTE/4G, then I get throttled back to 2G/Edge.
I am suing the city because they posted a 45 MPH speed limit on main street and I hit traffic and I couldn't do 45 MPH. Oh, and an ambulance went by they were able to get through traffic faster than me. How dare the city limit my usage of the street!
First, if your site can't handle a hit every couple of seconds, you need to throw it away. Second, there is this little file called robots.txt that you should read about. With it, you can tell the spider how quickly it should crawl your site, and what parts it should crawl. With a sitemap, you can even tell it how often each page is likely to change.
I agree. There is no way deadpool should be at 234. It is easily a top 50.
That's nice. Use wireless charging.
If they were serious about faster internet, they would paint their routers red instead of the slow white/black.
Well, the same can be pretty much said about both the webkit and gecko engines as well. I actually have more outstanding bugs in those engines than I do edge or IE, and they typically take a lot longer to get fixed than in IE/Edge. Sure, I might be an outlier, but that is my personal experience. I had one bug in firefox that has been outstanding for nearly 10 years, and every once in a while I see someone play with it, only to be kicked down the road further. webkit is pretty much the same, until years go by and then they get closed as wont-fix even though they all have short simple examples, and have been verified to be actual bugs.
And I'm not an anonymous coward. I call out the BS as I see it.
My Kenmore washing machine (bought 1969) has an out-of-balance detector. It stops and lets out a very loud buzz.
Yes, it still works, 47 years later -- it has never had a single problem in all those years.
My name isn't Joe, and I could secure our own network better. The awesome thing about the cloud is when someone higher up asks me to do something really stupid, I can just say no, we can't do that -- which keeps the network secure.
And yet the static HTML of the 90s still has security issues, like the (malformed) GIF exploits of old.
Actually, most spam doesn't come from broken Windows boxes any more and it hasn't been that way for a long time. Most spam comes from rooted linux servers these days. No spammer wants the old XP box running behind 128kbps DSL, they would much rather target the linux server sitting in a data center connected by multi-gigabit connections.
They found no fault in 12 of the devices... because the user was holding it wrong.
Only because you are already entrenched into an environment that has been tailored for that type of set up. Imagine having a Xbox/PS with next to no storage capacity where all (your) games are loaded directly from the cloud. How about an "unlimited" DVR where your DVR stores everything in the cloud? Full system backups to the cloud? How about moving your entire CPU/GPU to the cloud where what is rendered is set to you for displaying locally much like Nvidia was attempting with their grid architecture. You'd never have to buy another game console or PC ever again except if/when something revolutionary happens, and even then it would be 1/5th the price.
In short, local storage becomes much less desirable if you can get virtually unlimited storage at nearly the same speed as you could locally. Consumers would never need to buy another hard drive for any device. You would only need a small amount of storage to use possibly as a cache, and you would be better served by using an appropriately sized SSD for such a task.
Pinetops should just announce that they are now merging with the town of Wilson. No more issues.
Besides, Uber would probably only have to hire just a few extra people to monitor the news worldwide and enter a command to temporarily prevent rating spikes in emergency situations in a localized area.
You mean like:
Uber soon tweeted that they'd deactivated their surge pricing algorithm for the affected area
Guess they already did that.
No. You can't really do that via most routers. You can only control your own router, and only packets you create can have to QoS you set. The ones coming from the internet don't have your QoS set.
Grats on your brand new phone that is almost as good as last years iPhone.
According to you, but the masses disagree.
I can tell you've never driven both a Tesla and a stingray. Telsa has a 50/50 weight distribution, and the stingray has a 49.5/50.5 (most still consider that 50/50) and has a lower center of gravity than the Tesla. The Telsa does 60-0 in 102 feet. The stingray in 97 feet. Tesla on lateral acceleration is 0.90g, while the stingray is 1.20g and that is a HUGE difference. The Tesla still handles like a sedan -- almost any current sporty car will do better than 0.90g.
Which is obviously why you got the Tesla. I went the other route, and don't regret it -- but Tesla was one on a short list when I got the stingray. However, I like tracking my car more than I like not paying for gas and the stingray handles better, brakes better, and looks better than the Tesla. But the Tesla uses no gas, and can seat 4/5 people, but I have another car for when I need to seat more than 2.
Teslas are nice cars, but they don't handle better, not by a long shot. Some of that is because of the battery packs, which leads to any tesla (P85D+) that can actually out accelerate my car (in a straight line and only up to ~110MPH at which point I out accelerate it, and pass it at ~140MPH) weighing more than 50% more than my car (corvette stingray). Unfortunately, tesla can't defy physics, and that means teslas have pretty poor handling. However, it is incredibly impressive for what it is -- a high tech 4 seater EV sedan.
Because it has been shown over and over that people with iPhones actually spend money, while those with androids don't. Sure, you only get 16-18% of the smartphone market (but that also includes Macs and the majority of tablet market), but those 16-18% iPhone users outspend the android users 20 to 1 (2000% more per user). So, overall if it's an iPhone exclusive, you make 250% more than if it was an android exclusive. You asked why, they are only following the money, which is what any good business man would do.
I grew up in the mid west, where winter temperatures frequently spend weeks in the below zero range - battery efficiency simply doesn't work well enough there... so cross off 1/3 of the country..
WHOA? I live in the mid west currently, and teslas are all over the place. They work just fine in the winter (albeit with slightly less range), but what's going from 320 mile range to 250 mile range when you are only drive ~40 miles?