Slashdot Mirror


Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Feature a Headphone Jack (sammobile.com)

Samsung's next flagship smartphone, which may be released sooner than later due to the Note 7 fiasco, may not feature a 3.5mm headphone jack. In fact, Samsung may be one of many manufacturers to make the jump from the 3.5mm headphone jack to USB-C for audio. The USB Implementers Forum published the Audio Device Class 3.0 specification that brings USB Audio over USB Type-C. What this means is that "mobile devices including smartphones, tablets and ultraportable laptops could ditch the headphone jack in the very near future without worrying about having to bake audio support into USB-C or a new, proprietary port," writes Chris Smith via BGR. SamMobile adds: "Removing the dedicated audio plug will also allow OEMs to create smartphones that are slimmer and have better water resistance capabilities."

446 comments

  1. Sigh not more of this bullshit by redmid17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I like being able to charge my phone AND listen to music. It's not a niche use. Millions of people do it every day. I don't want wireless headphones. At least nail down wireless charging before you jam every possible output/input through one port.

    1. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by ProzacPatient · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I like being able to charge my phone AND listen to music. It's not a niche use. Millions of people do it every day. I don't want wireless headphones. At least nail down wireless charging before you jam every possible output/input through one port.

      It is as if Samsung wants everyone to abandon them. All of my portable electronics are Samsung but because of non-sense like this along with non-removable batteries and a lack of SD card slots I'll probably be making the jump to LG next time I'm in the market for a new device, but for right now I'm sticking with a Note 4 because, in my opinion, it's the last decent phone in the Galaxy lineup.

    2. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. Hopefully they will ADD a USB port and not just leave us hanging. I would like to see an additional port on the opposite edge of my current charging port. Almost every USB implementation includes 2 available ports and they could utilize the existing boards without having to expand the size. I am also not really actively seeking a phone that is thinner overall, make it smaller to better fit in a pocket and flexible to better withstand the squashing effect.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    3. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I have an iPhone 5, not a Samsung. In any case I'm not sure how that posts makes me a fanboy. If you're not calling me one, then it's just a nonsensical response.

    4. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dunno.. i got a drill.. and.. i just follow that youtube video of how to drill a hole in your iphone7 to uncover the secret headphone jack.. im pretty comfortable drilling a hole in a samsung..

    5. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Did it mention anywhere that they were just removing the audio jack and not replacing it with anything, or are they adding an additional usb-c port that you can plug usb-c headphones into? While I'm not a fan of change for its own sake, at least the latter option doesn't carry all of the same accessibility concerns as the inability to use headphones while charging might.

    6. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people still have tape decks in their POS cars and use their phones instead of a $300 stereo upgrade.

    7. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Some people still have tape decks in their POS cars and use their phones instead of a $300 stereo upgrade.

      There's really no need to spend that much even. If you think that's the case, perhaps you just like blowing money and pretending that you're richer than you really are.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by MouseR · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not being tied to your phone by the short headphone cable could protect you from your exploding phone.

      Smart thinking.

    9. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Some people still have tape decks in their POS cars and use their phones instead of a $300 stereo upgrade.

      If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Listen to grandpa. Phones are thin enough.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    11. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people still have tape decks in their POS cars and use their phones instead of a $300 stereo upgrade.

      If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.

      Why? I spent right around $300 to replace a basic AM/FM radio with a unit that has Bluetooth, USB and iPod integration. I think that's worth it and not excessive, not to mention safer, as I don't have to fumble with a phone to select tracks.

      A 5-speed with good tunes is better than most anti-depressants.

    12. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I like being able to charge my phone AND listen to music. It's not a niche use. Millions of people do it every day. I don't want wireless headphones. At least nail down wireless charging before you jam every possible output/input through one port.

      It is as if Samsung wants everyone to abandon them. All of my portable electronics are Samsung but because of non-sense like this along with non-removable batteries and a lack of SD card slots I'll probably be making the jump to LG next time I'm in the market for a new device, but for right now I'm sticking with a Note 4 because, in my opinion, it's the last decent phone in the Galaxy lineup.

      Better hurry on that LG; because their next phone won't have a 3.5 mm Jack, either.

    13. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree. Hopefully they will ADD a USB port and not just leave us hanging. I would like to see an additional port on the opposite edge of my current charging port. Almost every USB implementation includes 2 available ports and they could utilize the existing boards without having to expand the size. I am also not really actively seeking a phone that is thinner overall, make it smaller to better fit in a pocket and flexible to better withstand the squashing effect.

      It's a PHONE. Want multipke ports? Get a hub.

    14. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      i dunno.. i got a drill.. and.. i just follow that youtube video of how to drill a hole in your iphone7 to uncover the secret headphone jack.. im pretty comfortable drilling a hole in a samsung..

      I say go for it!

    15. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That's nice. Use wireless charging.

    16. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not going to comment on the wisdom of removing the headphone jack, but it'd be trivially easy to add multiple USB ports, solving that problem and a few others too. It wouldn't even affect the thinness of the device.

      Can't see Samsung doing that though, at least, not unless Apple also does it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by thesupraman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, because watching a movie on a long flight while having your phone plugged in to keep it charged NEVER happens.
      Or are we ALL supposed to 'baaaa' when corps tell us to jump?

      Just another reason to pick up a Chinese phone for half the price, which delivers 90% of the functionality.

      but no, macs4all, I can see that your actual motivation is to defend the retarded choice YOUR religion has already forced on you.
      I suggest you get over it - some of the rest of the world prefers choice..

    18. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if you are one of the many people in this world who likes to listen to music and browse/text on their phones? Wireless charging is for when you don't want to do anything with your phone. Listening to music while doing something ELSE on your phone is not a niche use case either. Apple has doomed as all to dongle hell and now Samsung is going along for the ride too.

    19. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by rossdee · · Score: 1

      >I like being able to charge my phone AND listen to music.

      Its a Samsung, so you might not want to be too close to your phone when you charge it, you might get caught in the explosion.

      Anyway the good news is that the latest Kindle Fire has a microSD slot so you can use it as an >MP3 player, you aren't just stuck with streaming.

    20. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      but no, macs4all, I can see that your actual motivation is to defend the retarded choice YOUR religion has already forced on you.
      I suggest you get over it - some of the rest of the world prefers choice..

      Says the person who just called someone a childish insulting name for his choice of phone...

      The rest of the world prefers choice, unless of course it isn't the same choice you made, right?

    21. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a PHONE. Nobody wants to use a phone with a hub dangling from it.

    22. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Millions? Seriously? Anyway adapters with a double output power+headphone will flourish soon. Apple didn't do it because it's not aesthetically correct.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    23. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't buy that crap or there will be more of it.

    24. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by ElectricPrism · · Score: 1

      Since when did exploding become a feature of phones?

    25. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      In addition, I wish companies would stop with the "better water resistance" BS. My Kyocera Hydro VIBE, released in 2014, has a headphone jack (and user-replacable battery) and is certified waterproof to 1m for 30min. If Kyocera could do it 2 years ago, Samsung and Apple should be able to do now with these features - unless people want to go SCUBA diving with their phones.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    26. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by e432776 · · Score: 1

      I noticed where this use is very common: in airports, while people are waiting to charge their phones and board flights. I'm sure there are other instances also.

    27. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lose whatever percentage to inefficiency? Last figure I heard was 30% so if everyone starts wasting that amount of power, start building some more nuclear /coal plants

    28. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      I have tried both. Will go for antidepressants any day.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    29. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Until they make wireless charging (which is repackaged 100 year old technology called a transformer with the primary coil in the charging pad and the secondary coil inside the phone) gets as fast as a direct wired connection, AND they somehow can beam it into my phone so I don't have to keep it flat and still on the pad and I can hold it naturaly, I want my phone to have both a wired charger AND a standard 3.5mm headphone jack. No weird USB/proprietary headphone connectors, no being forced to use battery draining Bluetooth, no having to chose between charging or listening, otherwise NO SALE.

    30. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by stealth_finger · · Score: 2

      Because it went so well when they removed the sd card slot. No 3,5mm=No buy. No SD slot=No buy.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    31. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      but no, macs4all, I can see that your actual motivation is to defend the retarded choice YOUR religion has already forced on you. I suggest you get over it - some of the rest of the world prefers choice..

      Says the person who just called someone a childish insulting name for his choice of phone...

      The rest of the world prefers choice, unless of course it isn't the same choice you made, right?

      To be fair the only choice of phone he specified was one with a headphone jack. Fuck the iphone and now fuck the samsung. Anyone else who drops it, well fuck them too.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    32. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since when did exploding become a feature of phones?

      With S7, I believe.

    33. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I agree. Hopefully they will ADD a USB port and not just leave us hanging. I would like to see an additional port on the opposite edge of my current charging port. Almost every USB implementation includes 2 available ports and they could utilize the existing boards without having to expand the size. I am also not really actively seeking a phone that is thinner overall, make it smaller to better fit in a pocket and flexible to better withstand the squashing effect.

      To this I would add, make a nice metal detailing around the side with an aerial that can be "enhanced" by holding it a certain way, sell it in fancy shops with white decor and hipster attendants, and finally add IOS and call it "Iphone 4". Progress!

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    34. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it carries the concern of having yet another stupid dongle to use a device properly. More than one stupid dongle actially because I own a number of headsets for different purposes and I dont keep them all in the same place.

      Oh, and I own wireless ones too. I use them for conference calls because despite being pricey they abaolutely suck at playing music. I'd throw them out but they're hazardous waste because of the rechargeable batteries, yet another way bluetooth headphones are a total fail.

      Changing something for the better is one thing. Replacing something that works with something that sucks is change only the utterly ignorant can support.

    35. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

      I have a second vehicle that is a piece of crap SUV that I use during inclement weather or when I need to haul things around - it still has a tape deck in it. I use one of those crappy tape-to-phono adapters with a cheap bluetooth audio receiver USB stick thing to play music.

      Why? The speakers are garbage, the amplifier is garbage, so the audio stream can be garbage and nobody will notice. The convenience of not having to plug things in / unplug things whenever getting in and out of that piece of crap is more important to me than the fidelity of audio that is being delivered to shitty speakers through a garbage stock 1990s Toyota in-dash amplifier.

      Short version: even people with tape decks can use Bluetooth audio with a $15 investment.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    36. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is somewhat difficult on SSRI, but doable, especially when combined with Bupropion. Hookers are fine, but antidepressants are more helpful still.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    37. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Maritz · · Score: 1

      It will.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    38. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by houghi · · Score: 1

      There are two parties and I like neither. That is why I go with a third party. I now have a Huwaei. I am utterly not brand loyal and have owned Acer, Samsung, Nokia and some I do not even remeber anymore.
      Luckily I live in a country where locking devices is forbidden by law, so I can buy any phone I desire and use that. I also switch providers at will. I do not have a running contract so no iddues there either.

      However I understand why they are ding it. Because you are not really the customer. They do not sell to you. They sell to the phone companies and that is where they get the real money from. And if they are not against it, nothng will change.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    39. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by jabuzz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your on a flight, you have to have flight mode enabled. At that point wireless headphones are not an option.

      It is one of the major use cases that shows the stupidity of removing the headphone jack.

    40. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is as if Samsung wants everyone to abandon them.

      No, it is as if someone wants clicks for their website. Samsung make lots of things, there are other devices they might be interested in this tech for, or may even just be looking at it speculatively without any concrete plans what they will use it for.

      Non-removable batteries are a non-issue* for most people, and they have back-tracked on removing the SD-card slot.

      *First you need to buy spare batteries, then an external charger for them, then when your battery gets low you need to switch the phone off to change it. Of course the batteries will only be good for that one phone, if you have another phone you need different batteries for that, when you buy a new phone you need to buy a new set of batteries to go with it. This adds up to expense and hassle people don't want to bother with. If people need more power on the go, they can use a USB battery pack instead, this is perhaps bulkier, and needs to be attached to the phone for a while to transfer its power, but you don't need a separate charger for it, and it is useful for any device you can connect to a USB power supply, you don't need to change it when you change your phone. I used to think removable batteries were essential, but after a while I realised that for me they were more hassle than they were worth, all I care is that it isn't too difficult to replace them when they wear out (and for the S6 at least, it isn't that difficult to take off the back cover and change it, one of my non-technical work colleagues replaced a cracked back cover on his without any assistance, from there changing the battery is only a small extra step).

    41. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the Note 7. How did you miss the news?

    42. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm still pissed off over having to accept an S6 as a replacement for my stolen S5 and to endure the attendant loss of removable battery and SD card.

      Apparently no-one wants the S6 badly enough to pick my pocket for it, though, so lucky me, I guess.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    43. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Your on a flight, you have to have flight mode enabled. At that point wireless headphones are not an option."

      That's not correct. While "flight mode" on some phones may also turn off Bluetooth, there is no issue with using Bluetooth (or WiFi) on a plane. My phone disables cellular/BT/WiFi when I switch to airplane mode, but I can then turn Bluetooth back on.

      If your air carrier provides Wi-Fi service during flight, you may use those services. You can also continue to use short-range Bluetooth accessories, like wireless keyboards.

      Source: FAA

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    44. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Screw SSRIs, SSRAs is where the joy is!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    45. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Can only speak for myself but too much serotonin is not that much fun. The first few days on SSRI I had a slight hypomania, which was nice indeed, but then I almost completely stopped caring - why bother doing anything if everything seems okay? That's why I stay at 25mg sertraline - that's half of the lowest usual dosage. NDRI on the other hand - bupropion - is really pleasant. Too bad really that it causes seizures in higher dosages.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    46. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Samsung tends to lead Apple these days. In fact they started doing it years ago, at least back in the Galaxy S3 days with their "maybe next year" marketing campaign mocking the iPhone.

      My guess would be that if they do remove the headphone socket they would at least retain wireless charging to cover the charge-and-listen use case. But on their larger phones it really doesn't make sense because they already have a similar size port for the pen peripheral. Plus they have always been fairly strong on headphone sound quality, competing with LG.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the country. In some using any transmitter (in the most idiotic ones even a receiver) is illegal. Chances of getting caught are zero though.

    48. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 2

      It will.

      Maybe the next one; but certainly not the one after that. In fact, when the iPhone 8 comes out with ZERO intrusions through the case, except for a sealed speaker and microphone, and a requisite 50 m water-resistance rating (which the Apple Watch already has), soon all smartphones will be sealed, too.

    49. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Upgrading the stereo in a lot of cars is painful, the stock systems often integrate with various other features of the car and you'll lose this integration if you replace the system.
      A lot of older car audio systems, especially the higher end ones have very good sound quality but just lack modern playback sources. Connecting a phone, or other audio source to the stock system is generally the easiest, most effective and most future proof thing to do.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    50. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiotic Apple zealot. Even your God Steve Jobs would have told you it's more than just a phone. It's a portable, handheld computer.

    51. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      SSRIs and NDRIs don't do jack shit in my system. I could eat them like candy and there has been exactly zero effect. Apparently my body does not produce serotonin and norepinephrine in quantities where reducing the reuptake would have any sensible effect.

      But pump that stuff in and ... surprise!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    52. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. You see the problem with Apple zealots, aside from their gross stupidity, is that they only think in terms of Apple. Your cult only offers a few phone models whereas a large manufacturers like Samsung, LG, HTC, and many more have many different models to choose from at various price points and features. This summer I bought a Samsung On7 Pro that still has a removable battery. So, while LG and others might offer a few phones without a headphone jack, many other models will still provide one for many years to come.

    53. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Where are all the people grousing about not being able to use their phono-plugged headphones in a Lightning connector now? Is using a USB-C to phono adapter acceptable, but for some reason lightning-to-phono isn't?

      Oh, right. Not Apple, so everything is fine. My bad.

      Read the thread again, plenty of moaning about that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    54. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Holi · · Score: 1

      anti-depressants.. what a shitty name. I have yet to find one that has not had unintended side effects. at best I am stable but sad at worst I am a danger to myself. SSRI's and I do not mix.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    55. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Holi · · Score: 1

      My truck has a 1/8 input jack for my phone. In fact regardless of whether you use a tape deck adapter or you radio has an aux port you are still using a 1/8 headphone jack.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    56. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by pastafazou · · Score: 0

      Are the moderators smoking crack today?
      From the article: "Removing the dedicated audio plug will also allow OEMs to create smartphones that are slimmer and have better water resistance capabilities."
      And you reply with "it'd be trivially easy to add multiple USB ports, solving that problem and a few others too." How does switching a headphone jack for a USB save space and increase water resistance? Seriously? How? And finally, you end your comment with "Can't see Samsung doing that though, at least, not unless Apple also does it."
      Hello, welcome to 2016. Apple has already released a new phone with the headphone jack removed. Moderators, lay off the crack pipe while moderating please.

    57. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Right, because having wireless earbuds explode is even better. NOT!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    58. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Seriously how?

      I replaced the stereo in my car a couple years back and put in one that you can connect a phone or USB stick to, gets the HD sub channels, and has all the standard features for like $120 (included the wiring harness). What I couldn't find was a radio that had USB, HD-Radio, and weather band. The adapter box so I could use the steering wheel controls was another $20 and was only 3 wires. So for about $140 and a couple hours of work outside on a nice sunny day I installed a new better stereo in my car. If you are spending more than $300 dollars on a car stereo you are likely being suckered, are in a high school dick measuring contest, or one of those people who thinks that everyone else likes to hear your shit music from your ghetto blaster.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    59. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      you don't get rid of a troll by feeding it

    60. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If you are spending more than $300 dollars on a car stereo you are likely being suckered

      That was my point, Bob. I think you misunderstood my comment.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    61. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      And Cat offers a rugged smart phone that is waterproof down to 2 or 5 meters (there is a switch that closes ports for deeper depths) for 1 hour and it has a headphone jack. It also has a removable battery and a microSD card slot. It also appears that Cat didn't go and do much molesting of android for their phone either.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    62. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Not really... you can get usb headphones easily... this is nowhere near as bad as Apple's switch to lightning because the form-factor is standard and ubiquitous instead of proprietary.

    63. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you are; some airlines are no wireless, some are none until 10,000ft. For me that is the most important time for noise cancelling and music-- relaxing into the flight despite the chaos often around you.

      I am a long time iPhone user, and honestly am not sure what I will do now; I should be good with my 6 for another 4-6 months before the battery becomes an issue (although i think I am due for a free upgrade on our business plan). I use Bose QC20's (with goofy battery pack). I would need to chain the goofy little dongle with the battery pack "snop", and the abberation would be even more awful to keep in a pocket while flying.

      But, do I really trust that Apple will stick with Thunderbolt for the future, rather than switching to USB-C. Not worth spending the money on headphones every cycle. I fly a lot and need good noise cancelling headphones...

    64. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough*collusion*cough*pricefixing*cough*

    65. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I did misunderstand it as I took it as meaning that one had simple tastes, but then it is early and that is my excuse and I'm sticking to it.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    66. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of you jacking off over Apple making a dildo.

    67. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      I love how you say that like it's a good thing. Dropping the headphone jack is a way to break compatibility with payment swipe devices like square. The aim is to force people to use apple pay. Not to mention being the last drm free port on the device.

      50m water resistance. Oh yes, we all want payment services and millions of device configurations that depend on the heaphone jack as a drm free input source so we can have this glorious feature nobody cares about. Samsung already has water resistance that is more than adequate.

      Also did anyone consider that nobody actually wants phones to be any slimmer? I don't know how they got so many suckers to buy phontablets that don't fit in their pockets but most people who have look at my moto x which went smaller and a perfect fit in the hand with envy.

      There is too thin (hand ergonomics), there is too light (aka fragile and lacking haptic feedback in handling), and there is too large (no longer fits forgetably in a front pocket/hand ergonomics).

    68. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      they all (S6 onwards)have Qi charging built in since the s6 i think. the S7 certainly does as i listen to music whilst charging on that.
      But I only do that when my bluetooth headset needs charging... there's no problem really.

    69. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I've found where I'm buying my next phone.

    70. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by mark-t · · Score: 1

      USB is a non-proprietary and ubiquitous standard... usb headphones are not that expensive and are readily available, requiring no licensing fees to a third party to utilize. The only expense comes with supporting the standard in the first place... but objections to it are fundamentally not significantly different than the early objections to using usb instead of rs232.

    71. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Better hurry on that LG; because their next phone won't have a 3.5 mm Jack, either.

      The story made my morning, and of course the phone jack will be going away on everything in the end. Its a failure prone device that has needed replaced for years. I've replaced dozens in items where you can get to them to replace. Bluetooth or for the smartphone audiophile anti-hipsters a wired headphone will suffice in the future.

      I don't usually call people hipsters, which is what I'm usually called, but this obsession with the 3.5 mm headphone jack some have is deliciously hipsterish. I can see clubs of people who gather in their gluten free, vegan pubs, drinking their Pabst Blue Ribbon - that's PBR to you unwashed folks, and rhapsodizing how their low oxygen copper wires and their beryllium copper jack connections are providing them with the superior listening experience through their vintage smartphones and Big Lots! headphones. And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    72. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It's a PHONE. Nobody wants to use a phone with a hub dangling from it.

      Which is somehow different than a plugged in headset dangling from it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    73. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by rgbscan · · Score: 1

      Square already went wireless..... https://squareup.com/contactless-chip-reader

    74. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to PopeRatzo, you're a simple person.

    75. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      so you can use it as an >MP3 player, you aren't just stuck with streaming

      Streaming is a no-go for many (99.5% of the people outside US or EU - I'm included...)

    76. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Where are all the people grousing about not being able to use their phono-plugged headphones in a Lightning connector now? Is using a USB-C to phono adapter acceptable, but for some reason lightning-to-phono isn't?

      Oh, right. Not Apple, so everything is fine. My bad.

      Read the thread again, plenty of moaning about that.

      He just thought they were having sexytime.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    77. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Since when did exploding become a feature of phones?

      That's a security feature on the S7. The real problem was that it kept getting accidentally activated.

      Something to do with the headphone jack shorting out....

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    78. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And lose whatever percentage to inefficiency? Last figure I heard was 30% so if everyone starts wasting that amount of power, start building some more nuclear /coal plants

      Should be marked insightful or informative. Since the phone itself has to have the secondary of an inductive transformer component in it, the inefficiencies are huge. You don't see anyone building real transformers that way because no one in their right mid would.

      What's more, the problem of a base to charge a phone on was solved a long time ago. It was called a charging dock.

      Wireless phone chargers create more problems than they solve.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    79. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      A doctor I knew once said: a drug without side effects doesn't have any effect and SSRIs aren't the only antidepressants available. They work for some people, but don't work for others.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    80. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people still have tape decks in their POS cars and use their phones instead of a $300 stereo upgrade.

      If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.

      Let me guess -- you're filled with all kinds of nuance and subtlety, so you're obviously not a "simple person".

      Let me also guess --

      You're a professor in an American university and have a beard.

      Gee, how the fuck did I know that...????

    81. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      THC.

    82. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by msauve · · Score: 1

      I can't recall being on a plane where they specifically targeted "wireless," and it's been a while since they said "turn them off." It's now "airplane mode." And, per the previous link - "Cell phones should be in airplane mode or with cellular service disabled â" i.e., no signal bars displayedâ"and cannot be used for voice communications based on FCC regulations that prohibit any airborne calls using cell phones."

      Airlines, in particular the pilots, can do what they want, but there's no general rule preventing the use of Bluetooth "during all phases of flight ... gate-to-gate..."

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    83. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      The irony of you jacking off over Apple making a dildo.

      How erudite.

    84. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised people still use Samsung after they started locking their bootloaders even in retail phones not purchased through a wireless carrier.

    85. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Samsung already has water resistance that is more than adequate.

      That's not what many Samsung owners say.

    86. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      If the device is going to have a USB port anyway, then adding an additional USB port (by the side, obviously, not on top) will affect neither space nor water resistance.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    87. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, a simple person would be someone that spends $300+ on a stereo for a vehicle that is worth $1500. Especially when it only gets driven a few times a month.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    88. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Better hurry on that LG; because their next phone won't have a 3.5 mm Jack, either.

      The story made my morning, and of course the phone jack will be going away on everything in the end. Its a failure prone device that has needed replaced for years. I've replaced dozens in items where you can get to them to replace. Bluetooth or for the smartphone audiophile anti-hipsters a wired headphone will suffice in the future.

      I don't usually call people hipsters, which is what I'm usually called, but this obsession with the 3.5 mm headphone jack some have is deliciously hipsterish. I can see clubs of people who gather in their gluten free, vegan pubs, drinking their Pabst Blue Ribbon - that's PBR to you unwashed folks, and rhapsodizing how their low oxygen copper wires and their beryllium copper jack connections are providing them with the superior listening experience through their vintage smartphones and Big Lots! headphones. And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      Every time Apple pushes the market forward, there is a great gnashing of teeth. Then everyone follows Apple. This is no different.

    89. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Aczlan · · Score: 1

      If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.

      Or you drive a Chevy/GMC and want the steering wheel controls to work (Look up a 2005 Suburban on Crutchfield, any adapter kit with steering wheel controls is over $100).

      Aaron Z

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
    90. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.

      If you look down on people who spend money on different kinds of entertainment than you do, your simplicity is proven beyond all possible doubt.

    91. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Last time I was on a plane, anything that broadcast a signal had to be off for the whole flight. The kids had cases for their tablets with Bluetooth keyboards.. couldn't use them for the whole flight.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    92. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod to +1000000

    93. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Yes and if I glue a 3.5mm adapter to the end of them they'll work with all the audio devices I have!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    94. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I like my S7 and it will be many years before I replace it so a new smart phone doesn't interest me. That being said when it comes time to replace it one of my buying choices will feature a 3.5mm jack. If its another Samsung then fine, if not then its been a good run.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    95. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Air China, Cathay Pacific, China Airlines, China Southern, China Eastern, Emirates, United, All Nippon Airlines, and many more ban the use of Bluetooth on their airlines. I guess if you never travel outside the US you're OK. But, considering that China, India, and SE Asia alone account for about half of all humanity - that's a mighty big market you're going to basically say "you can't use your phone for music" to.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    96. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is most of the people that I know that own the slim iphone 6 promptly stick it in a otter box or some other case.

      "Oh look how slim my phone is. Now lets stick it in this case the size of small brick."

      The above sounds funnier if you play it in your head in someone else voice. I suggest Robbin Williams, George Carlin, or Madalyn Albright.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    97. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by shaitand · · Score: 1

      None is more than adequate for 99% of users and water resistence on an electronic device should not be trusted regardless. In 10 years I've never needed water resistance. There is a reason they make a mint selling suckers protection plans to cover it.

    98. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Apple Accessory Interface spec explicitly prohibits "Y" cables. If you do a cable, it can have one and only one connector on each end, it can only have two ends, and certain combinations (such as Lightning and USB C) are prohibited (except, of course, for Apple - they can make cables they ban everyone else from making). Otherwise it must be a dongle, with a hard plastic case, must have a certain minimum size, and must have a certain minimum combination of connectors.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    99. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      Is someone actually working on this? If not, DIBS! Now to start a kickstarter campaign.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    100. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Better hurry on that LG; because their next phone won't have a 3.5 mm Jack, either.

      The story made my morning, and of course the phone jack will be going away on everything in the end. Its a failure prone device that has needed replaced for years. I've replaced dozens in items where you can get to them to replace. Bluetooth or for the smartphone audiophile anti-hipsters a wired headphone will suffice in the future.

      I don't usually call people hipsters, which is what I'm usually called, but this obsession with the 3.5 mm headphone jack some have is deliciously hipsterish. I can see clubs of people who gather in their gluten free, vegan pubs, drinking their Pabst Blue Ribbon - that's PBR to you unwashed folks, and rhapsodizing how their low oxygen copper wires and their beryllium copper jack connections are providing them with the superior listening experience through their vintage smartphones and Big Lots! headphones. And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      Every time Apple pushes the market forward, there is a great gnashing of teeth. Then everyone follows Apple. This is no different.

      But oh so much fun to listen/read the gnashing of teeth. Reminds me of the olde fartes bemoaning the death of incandescant light bulbs.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    101. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'd play it the same way.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    102. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      Is someone actually working on this? If not, DIBS! Now to start a kickstarter campaign.

      Way back when, there was a war between 8 track and cassette tapes. 8 track should have won, certainly cassettes were running a slow tape speed, and were designed for voice, not music. But the 8 track's achilles heal was that the tape had the weird playout of the tape from an angle in the center of the reel. So cassettes won. Then I remember the CD versus cassette tape wars. Fortunately, the cassettes lost that one quickly, since they pretty much sucked anyhow. Which the 3.5 mm jack will probably go the way of the cassette tape, once everyone settles down about it. And for the same reason.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    103. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      None is more than adequate for 99% of users and water resistence on an electronic device should not be trusted regardless. In 10 years I've never needed water resistance. There is a reason they make a mint selling suckers protection plans to cover it.

      I don't know what you saw, or how you derive your "99%" "statistic"; but it sure seemed like there were some fairly angry Sammy-owners in that forum...

      I never needed water-resistance either, until I chanced to dash about 20 feet to my car in a light rain, with my iPhone with top-mounted headphone jack in my top shirt-pocket. One. Frickin'. Raindrop. One!

    104. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you listened to them? I've been using my phone and electronics during take off and landing for years with no ill effects. Stop being a lemming and use the wireless on a plane. It won't break anything.

    105. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      I've flown 3 of those airlines and used my bluetooth headphones for the flight. I didn't have a single stewardess ask me to turn it off. Break the rules and learn to love being a bad ass!

    106. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was on a plane, you could make calls from your phone via the plane's microcell once out of US airspace. (Alitalia, last month).

    107. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Those tape adapters work better than the utter trash FM transmitters that you can barely heard and sound like crap. I installed an aftermarket stereo in my car because there's no way to get a 3.5mm input jack on the car without doing so. While I was at it I got with MP3 CD and USB so it became a moot point. If I had a tape deck in there instead of a CD player I would have just deployed the 1990s tech solution because it would have been easier than removing my whole dash.

    108. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung dropping replaceable batteries and SD card slots is why I went from a Galaxy S3 to and iPhone 6 Plus.

    109. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      One important aspect of being a parent is teaching them to respect rules, so yes we followed the rules.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    110. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised people still use Samsung after they started locking their bootloaders even in retail phones not purchased through a wireless carrier.

      Nobody cares, nerd.

    111. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, you're the one coming off as a hipster for wanting us to all end up paying more money for new devices and adapters for no improvement in experience. 3.5mm works fine, it's broadly compatible, it has no DRM, and it can't be rootkitted.

      But please, do go on about how everyone you disagree with drinks that famous hipster beer with the ribbon on it. I'm sure it will make having to buy batteries for headphones cheaper.

    112. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes it is different. Try keeping track of something big like a headset and compare it to keeping track of a hub the size of a pack of gum. I'm suggesting this since you apparently have not already done so, which is why you think there is no relevant difference.

    113. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm three pages of complaints. Not exactly a groudswell of anger.

      Whatchoo wanna bet that I can find similar forums for iphones.

    114. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CD's beat cassettes - eventually, after many years - because they were superior to cassettes in a number of concrete and obvious ways such as "no need to rewind", and "no snarled tape".

      This is not the case with USB-C vs 3.5mm.

    115. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by telchine · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the olde fartes bemoaning the death of incandescant light bulbs.

      I hated the death of incandecent light bulbs when the first started phasing them out. Compact flourecents just wern't as good. Now that we have LED bulbs, at affordable prices; I couldn't be happier.

      Same goes for the 3.5mm jack. I'm not interested in wireless earphones because they're a pain in the ass. They need charging (for the same reason I use a wired keyboard and mouse). USB Type-C is awesome but as others have pointed out, most devices only have one type-C port so you can't charge and listen at the same time; not without some complicated adapter anyway.

      When devices start coming with 2 or more USB ports, I'll be happy.

    116. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your on a flight, you have to have flight mode enabled.

      Says who? I've flown 6 times this year and on every flight I was told I need to turn off flight mode and turn on WiFi to access the entertainment system, make calls or browse the internet. My most recent flight even has replaced the redundant no-smoking sign with a no-mobile phone sign that the pilot can switch on and off.

    117. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in wireless earphones because they're a pain in the ass. They need charging (for the same reason I use a wired keyboard and mouse).

      I use a wireless mouse that can run wired while charging.

      My wireless headphones also come with an audio cable so that you can use them while the battery has no charge, or while you're on an aircraft and requested not to use transmitting devices.

      The world is not binary.

    118. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Right, because the folks making cheap chinese crap care what apple thinks.

      Whether it can work electrically is something completely different altogether.

    119. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Honestly, you're the one coming off as a hipster

      And you are most entertaining! Thank you.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    120. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Umm three pages of complaints. Not exactly a groudswell of anger.

      Whatchoo wanna bet that I can find similar forums for iphones.

      Except the ones for iPhones won't be threatening class-action suits based on fraudulent "Water-resistance" claims.

      Oh, and that Forum was in ADDITION to several ARTICLES regarding "failed water-resistance" tests. Here's one, for example. And here's another. And here's Samsung's obsufcated response.

      Want me to keep going (I can)?

    121. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it is different. Try keeping track of something big like a headset and compare it to keeping track of a hub the size of a pack of gum. I'm suggesting this since you apparently have not already done so, which is why you think there is no relevant difference.

      Here is a really weird life hack. Put the little dongle connecter on your wired headphone if you will die having anything else. Annnnnnnnddddddddd Get ready for it..... Leave it there! Who the hell knew that a device that could be plugged into something could be plugged into something?

      Then when you plug in the adapter, you - here is the tricky part.... Plug the dongle in.

      the freaking astonishing thing is you aren't likely to lose the dongle unless you lose the headset. But as you have eloquently pointed out, no one loses the headset, and problem solved! Considering the folks who have so much trouble with this plugging in thing concept, maybe I'll open a lifehacks webpage that shows how to do this. Then next week I'll have one on hoow to decide whether to use a fork or spoon.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    122. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      CD's beat cassettes - eventually, after many years - because they were superior to cassettes in a number of concrete and obvious ways such as "no need to rewind", and "no snarled tape".

      This is not the case with USB-C vs 3.5mm.

      Are you saying that a 3.5mm headphone jack is equal or superior to a USB-C jack? That's a remarkably bold and wrong statement.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    123. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I hated the death of incandecent light bulbs when the first started phasing them out. Compact flourecents just wern't as good. Now that we have LED bulbs, at affordable prices; I couldn't be happier.

      The CFL's were a stopgap, and no doubt. LED's are tremendous, especially since we can now put out a lot of light in fixtures that once used to be limited to 60 watt incandescant lights.

      Same goes for the 3.5mm jack. I'm not interested in wireless earphones because they're a pain in the ass. They need charging (for the same reason I use a wired keyboard and mouse). USB Type-C is awesome but as others have pointed out, most devices only have one type-C port so you can't charge and listen at the same time; not without some complicated adapter anyway.

      When devices start coming with 2 or more USB ports, I'll be happy.

      Agreed on the multiple USB ports.

      My headsets charge while I use them if I wish. My wireless mouse runs on AA's so charging isn't an issue Same with my wireless keyboard. I do have a wired Keyboard as well, which I use because Apple's wireless boards don't have a numbers keypad - teh jerks! and ths wired is the only one that does. So at certain parts of the year, I really need a keyboard with a numbers keypad. The standalone numericals just fly all over the place while I try to use them.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    124. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it because they are brave?

    125. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Umm three pages of complaints. Not exactly a groudswell of anger.

      Whatchoo wanna bet that I can find similar forums for iphones.

      And since you asked, here's a somewhat unscientific (but definitely "real-world") test of the iPhone 7's water-resistance. And here's an semi-scientific (but still quite "real-world") "Deep Water" Test between the S7 and the iPhone 7. Although both phones handily beat their respective IP ratings, wanna guess who won?

    126. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Cut 'em some slack - the phone would have featured a jack... but it was lost in the fire.

    127. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      And passing rumors that someone is making an 8-track adapter for their smartphones.

      Is someone actually working on this? If not, DIBS! Now to start a kickstarter campaign.

      8-track to cassette adapters exist.

      Cassette to 3.5mm adapters exist.

      Combine the two and you're done

    128. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      It's a troll article and a troll headline. Read it? It says USB analog audio will be a standard and will be easier to do. It does not say a thing about whether Samsung will leave out the 3.5mm jack. And given the hit Apple took to its sales and reputation, I guess Samsung will be keeping the 3.5mm jack for at least another generation if not longer.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    129. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      8 track should have won...

      8 lost because it was crap. Surely you haven't forgotten how the tapes stretched after not very many plays and the cartridges seized up so the machine ate the tape... good luck luck fishing it back out, and you won't be playing that tape again.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    130. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      8 track should have won...

      8 lost because it was crap. Surely you haven't forgotten how the tapes stretched after not very many plays and the cartridges seized up so the machine ate the tape... good luck luck fishing it back out, and you won't be playing that tape again.

      Did you read what I posted? The ay it was wound onto the spool causd all those problems.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    131. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah butt you enjoy taking cock up your ass. This is a manly discussion we're having here. Take your faggotry elsewhere.

    132. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I can't even drink PBR because it's not gluten-free. And I mean that unironically.

      Hipsters like yourself who have fallen for Apple's marketing hype already have your own punishment anyway, by virtue of wasted money and missing features.

    133. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, yeah, since I use headphones for different devices, I will then plug the dongle into my computer because they totally work that way! I might as well use glue! There is never a reason a headphone could ever possibly be separated from a dongle, not even a bit of physical force which would normally be no issue!

      Alternative plan: ignore Apple hype addicts such as yourself, buy phone with headphone jack, don't buy dongle, don't lose or misplace dongle that was never purchased, save money on batteries, dongles, replacement headphones, etc.

    134. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But hey, Apple hipster, I'll agree to switch over to your way of living and even advocate for it.

      All I need you to do is provide me with money for dongles, lost dongles, various adapters and hubs when they inevitably change standards again, batteries for bluetooth headsets, money for inconvenience of not having access when dongles inevitably go lost or batteries die or when devices no longer match with a unuversal port, money to replace headphones again when they change the standards again...

      Because that's what hipsters like me care about. Not posing for fashion, but whether something is convenient and cost effective. :)

    135. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never needed water-resistance either, until I chanced to dash about 20 feet to my car in a light rain, with my iPhone with top-mounted headphone jack in my top shirt-pocket. One. Frickin'. Raindrop. One!

      My £40 Alcatel, which certainly isn't rated any level of waterproof, I sometimes bring out in light rain. A couple of times when it's been very wet, it's soaked through my pocket to the phone. Sometimes I bring it into the bath with me - I certainly don't submerge it, but it's very humid in there and can get splashed. Ofc, if I can see it's got wet, I can pop out the battery asap and have it dry out with the back off. None of this surprises me: a few splashes of water on any half-decent case shouldn't get inside.

      So, I gotta ask - what is so fragile about old iPhones? Are they built in some weird tight-tolerance way that means they were unusually likely to get damaged with a drop of water? I read they had a humidity sensor (why?! do they distrust their customers that much?) that'd get triggered even in very humid climates - it just seems ridiculous.

    136. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      No it is also a multi media player and has positioned itself as such. I just don't want to have to carry a 3rd/4th piece of equipment with me to utilize the basic functions. The phone, headphones, a charger, and now a hub to just listen to music or watch video. I suppose I could get a dual headed USB dongle that would solve the problem of watching and charging at the same time.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    137. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Haha, yeah, since I use headphones for different devices, I will then plug the dongle into my computer because they totally work that way! I might as well use glue! There is never a reason a headphone could ever possibly be separated from a dongle, not even a bit of physical force which would normally be no issue!

      Alternative plan: ignore Apple hype addicts such as yourself, buy phone with headphone jack, don't buy dongle, don't lose or misplace dongle that was never purchased, save money on batteries, dongles, replacement headphones, etc.

      You can do whatever you want. Because some things are just too hard for ya. I love you guys, it's like talking to the old shits down at the legion who are still pissed they took lead out of gasoline. Keep it up!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    138. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      But hey, Apple hipster, I'll agree to switch over to your way of living and even advocate for it.

      All I need you to do is provide me with money for dongles, lost dongles, various adapters and hubs when they inevitably change standards again, batteries for bluetooth headsets, money for inconvenience of not having access when dongles inevitably go lost or batteries die or when devices no longer match with a unuversal port, money to replace headphones again when they change the standards again...

      Because that's what hipsters like me care about. Not posing for fashion, but whether something is convenient and cost effective. :)

      Sorry that you can't keep track of things, You probably lose your phone as well. I really don't give a shit about what you want to use, it's just fu to watch you AC's come back with a story of how hard it is, or how you can't do this or do that.

      So keep me posted, I'm lovin it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    139. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Phones are pretty thin, there is always room for improvement but I personally would value a cool clamshell option that allowed for as much screen space or more without increasing the oversize MORE than I would losing another mm in thickness of a very thin device to begin with.

      You too can be da' Pope.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      Papal fashion statement
      http://www.nbc.com/saturday-ni...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    140. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I never needed water-resistance either, until I chanced to dash about 20 feet to my car in a light rain, with my iPhone with top-mounted headphone jack in my top shirt-pocket. One. Frickin'. Raindrop. One!

      My £40 Alcatel, which certainly isn't rated any level of waterproof, I sometimes bring out in light rain. A couple of times when it's been very wet, it's soaked through my pocket to the phone. Sometimes I bring it into the bath with me - I certainly don't submerge it, but it's very humid in there and can get splashed. Ofc, if I can see it's got wet, I can pop out the battery asap and have it dry out with the back off. None of this surprises me: a few splashes of water on any half-decent case shouldn't get inside.

      So, I gotta ask - what is so fragile about old iPhones? Are they built in some weird tight-tolerance way that means they were unusually likely to get damaged with a drop of water? I read they had a humidity sensor (why?! do they distrust their customers that much?) that'd get triggered even in very humid climates - it just seems ridiculous.

      Being an embedded developer, but not an iOS developer, I might venture a guess that it had something to do with the "button-reading" feature for the headsets, that was built into some sort of hardware/software combination that ultimately hooked directly into the headphone jack. I think the little water-shorts in the wetted Jack ended up kind of simulating some rapidly-changing and likely "illegal" button-presses, and it sort of DDOSed the OS, of at least some parts of it that were involved in the overall UI code, thus making the phone seem "crazy". Of it could have just been a plain-old-fashioned event-queue overflow, as the OS fell behind as it chased all those simulated button-presses around.

      So it isn't a matter of being a "fragile" design, per se; but rather one that probably just hadn't been tested for that particular type of data-flood. Meh. Happens.

    141. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No it is also a multi media player and has positioned itself as such. I just don't want to have to carry a 3rd/4th piece of equipment with me to utilize the basic functions. The phone, headphones, a charger, and now a hub to just listen to music or watch video. I suppose I could get a dual headed USB dongle that would solve the problem of watching and charging at the same time.

      Other than 2 channel analog audio from a 3.5 mm Jack, to get off of the device itself, any of the other functions are going to require either wireless comm. (and something on the other end like a set-top-box to deal with it), or some sort of converter/adapter widget. So, by dragging in the "multi-media" phrase into it (rather than just sticking to analog audio), your argument actually becomes self-defeating.

    142. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if I sounded sarcastic. I really do believe phones are plenty thin. And I only called you grandpa in deference to your impressively low UID.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    143. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      http://www.macworld.com/articl...

      Sounds like you are looking for excuses for your hate Apple, not reasons why their products are bad.

    144. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      4 to 6 months? What the fuck did you do to the poor thing? It should be good for a few years, at least. Oh, and I suppose the option of replacing the battery is simply too hard to deal with?

    145. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't even old enough to talk about 8 track. Shut the fuck up, kid.

    146. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm saying that your analogy is poor, because USB-C does not have concrete, objective, immediately-obvious advantages over 3.5mm in the same way that CD's have over cassettes.

      Pretend I have a phone with both a USB-C port and a 3.5mm headphone jack. What's your argument that I should ignore the perfectly-functional 3.5 jack and exclusively use the USB-C instead?

    147. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by kimvette · · Score: 1

      FALSE!
      Only the cellular radio needs to be turned off now, and for no technical reason in relation to the aircraft itself, but because the cellular network is not designed to handle large volumes of high speed cell handovers.
      Bluetooth and wifi are perfectly acceptable and now allowed by every major airline.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    148. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Funny that wifi is offered by most airlines now. I wonder how we connect to it with "anything that broadcast a signal has to be off?" ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    149. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Apple beat them to it starting with the iPhone 4 and it continues up through the 7. Of course they blame third-party chargers, because the phone isn't responsible for cutting off current to the battery when it reaches full charge. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    150. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      My Samsung Wireless Charging works just fine. I don't see what the problem would be.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    151. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Cybele352 · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you talking about??? o_O

      Since the Galaxy 5 all the new Samsung phones have the wireless charging mode available. (More than 110 phones with that option listed on Samsung US website).
      At least you still have the possibility of plugging some ear buds in the phone.

      The one (and only) point I agree with you is about the SD card slot.

    152. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully agree.

    153. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      My iPhone 6... typically they can last me about 30 months of heavy use.

    154. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it does not "feature" a headphone jack, then it will not be "featuring" customers either. But I highly doubt Samsung is that stupid.

    155. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You aren't even old enough to talk about 8 track. Shut the fuck up, kid.

      Don't I wish? Sorry, I'm a lot closer to death than birth. Celebrate if you like.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    156. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's nice. but they need the space for a mini fire extinguisher.

    157. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that your time is worthless?

    158. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      No actually I didn't drag multi-media into the argument, cRapple did. By positioning itself as the camera, movie watching, music listening end all be all darling of 'all cool' people everywhere.
      All I want is to be able to do what I could on the 'inferior' previous version of the device without having to spend more and get other equipment to do what I used to do natively. That is talk on the phone and listen to music, while keeping my device charged fully. Also to watch a movie that I might have downloaded from iTunes previously...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    159. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm I can take, and I like a debate with an intelligent proponent. It is good to have your opinions challenged otherwise you grow old and cranky. One is bad enough but unstoppable, the other just sucks. Cheers mate :)

      PS You can hang out on my lawn anytime.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    160. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      No actually I didn't drag multi-media into the argument, cRapple did. By positioning itself as the camera, movie watching, music listening end all be all darling of 'all cool' people everywhere. All I want is to be able to do what I could on the 'inferior' previous version of the device without having to spend more and get other equipment to do what I used to do natively. That is talk on the phone and listen to music, while keeping my device charged fully. Also to watch a movie that I might have downloaded from iTunes previously...

      Yes, you brought other media forms into a discussion that was about an analog audio interface.

      And now you move the goalposts even FURTHER, by brining iTunes downloads into this, too!

      This communication can serve no further purpose. You do not talk, you jabber. Communication terminated.

    161. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      LOL, I see if the discussion evolves into something you don't agree with there can be no point in further communication. A very adult option. My point was and always has been that I couldn't continue to perform the same functions on the new and 'superior' iPhone7 but you just take your toys and stomp off to your room. Macs4all or you throw yourself on the floor and have a temper tantrum ?? Officially I didn't feel any meaningful communication between the 2 of us in the first place. You do not communicate you shout into a canyon and listen to the echo of your own voice, hearing that as valid communication and confirmation that you are indeed the only opinion that exists or matters.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    162. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong again! Please show me a new current model six inch screen smart phone with a slide out physical keyboard. The last model I had that was worth a shit was the Moto Droid 4 and that was like back in 2013. When enough units are sold to satisfy the statistician bean counters definition of "adequate sample size" they'll cut features from phones they deem not cost effective. It happens in all industries. Do you still piss and moan about no 5.25" floppy drives in current computers? I still piss and moan you can't get a fucking car with an actual ashtray and cigarette lighter. History proves you wrong, AC.

    163. Re:Sigh not more of this bullshit by macs4all · · Score: 1

      LOL, I see if the discussion evolves into something you don't agree with there can be no point in further communication.

      No, you didn't "evolve" anything; rather, you simply kept moving and expanding your list of "grievances" (and then blaming it on me), to the point that it was obvious that, if I addressed every single one of them, you would simply respond with "Yeah, but what about..." until we had exhausted every single thing you didn't like about Apple. Life's too short for that.

      So, if you want to characterize my refusal to play your little game as "taking my toys and stomping off to my room", then so be it. I have played that particular game far too many times on this forum, with players far better than you.

    164. Re: Sigh not more of this bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet still completely accurate.

  2. Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know Samsung only copies Apple.

    1. Re:Well duh by frnic · · Score: 4, Funny

      I bet that not long after Samsung does this Apple will release a iPhone without the 3.5 mm jack.

    2. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuh-uh! Apple will remove all ports on its phone and go wireless only! Because wires are ugly and it takes courage to make leaps!

    3. Re:Well duh by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Nuh-uh! Apple will remove all ports on its phone and go wireless only! Because wires are ugly and it takes courage to make leaps!

      Don't laugh. With the data rates they can get with their W1 chip and 802.11ac WiFi, all they need is wireless charging and they are there. And guess who has been advertising for wireless charging talent lately?

    4. Re:Well duh by thesupraman · · Score: 0

      So, what you are saying is that if they pick up a feature that has been available on other phones for, let me thing,
      a good solid ten years. *innovation*.

      btw, if the 650kbps of BLE4.2 low power is not enough to stream your music to an active device (hint: one that can decode a compressed stream)
      then I suggest something is wrong, although you could always then use the 2.1mbps of the normal mode (not ultra low power), which, in case you
      are not counting, is more than enough for uncompressed CD quality..

      Of course most BT headphone makers have been lazy and stuck to old high compatibility modes, but hey - thats because there are very VERY few
      high quality headphones that use a digital RF link.

      W1 is good marketing, Apples usual 'different is better because our users are not technical enough to work it out' market approach.

    5. Re:Well duh by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Apple have curved edge screens? A phone model that comes with a stylus embedded?

      Oh wait they do have curved screens but not the edge and not intentionally... just once you put them in your pocket for a bit.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    6. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "With the data rates they can get with their W1 chip"

      You've fallen for some marketing BS there I'm afraid. Their W1 chip is just bluetooth with custom pairing on top (like other manufacturers have done with NFC for years). They get no better data rate than any other bluetooth 4.2 chipsets on the market.

    7. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then remove all buttons...

      which means no more screw(s) or other ways to open it...

      so no way of replacing the battery without destroying the phone.

    8. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I bet that not long after Samsung does this Apple will release a iPhone without the 3.5 mm jack."

      Well this kinda sums up a few "firsts" that Apple often get credited with.

      Samsung waited for the USB-C standard to be ratified so that they could use a future standard. Apple saw the direction the standard was going (as a founding member), and quickly integrated similar features into their proprietary standard. Unsurprisingly it takes less time for Apple to integrate the tech into the single vendor proprietary solution, and is first to market. However it's not an idea that originated with Apple, just the way the technology was heading.

    9. Re: Well duh by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I bet they will work up the courage to remove the screen, like they did years back with the Ipod Nano, and all apps including games will be interfaced entirely with voice! Finaly, the blind can play Angry Birds! Or if they really want to be brave, remove all of the components and just sell a fancy lump of metal and plastic, and include hallucinigenic drugs so they will have a bunch of iDiots thinking they are talking into a real phone!

    10. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two features that are either gimmicks, or of marginal usefulness.

      The mass market doesn't care. Evidence: analysts upgrading sell-through estimates of iPhone to 100M units.

    11. Re:Well duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I can totally see this (non sarcastically)!
      Take away a tried and true reliable format and replace with wireless. Market the fuck out of your super expensive (but you have to pay if you want the highest audio quality - beats) headphones till the reliability issues of low capacity (beats) and bad batches of batteries (beats) or the internal wiring quality issues (bose qc25, 35 & beats) just overcomes the hype and you re-market the old standard (knowing apple, with a new proprietary twist) as a new feature with increased reliability and backward compatibility with older devices. LOL

    12. Re:Well duh by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      The one other advantage that they (probably) have is that they'll have the AAC codec built into the headphones, so they don't have to re-encode using one of the other standards. I know that this is a specification feature of bluetooth, but I doubt many companies natively use AAC.

    13. Re:Well duh by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Analysts also thought pokemon go was going to make Nintendo a ton of cash until Nintendo pointed out it wasn't... most analysts figures are just made up guesses where you can list the steps of how you made the guess.

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    14. Re:Well duh by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I love my stylus. I use it to take notes and make quick sketches/drawings for work all the time. Extremely handy - I don't have to carry a laptop, or a tablet, or a paper notebook - just my Note 5.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  3. We don't need slimmer phones by caseih · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Phones are already so thin as to be barely usable with average hands. Why do they keep thinking they need to be thinner? Please help me understand.

    1. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      I fully agree! Now, not just super thin, but often with sharp edges - I guess that it keeps the smartphone case-makers in business.

    2. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      For tiny Trump hotdog fingers.

    3. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by ninthbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right? Thicken the phone back up with some more battery and leave my headphones alone. I don't give a flying fuck about water proof/resistance. Shit, doesn't a phone going in a pool help their sales?

    4. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't need a slimmer phone. Samsung and Apple do.

      They are purposefully kneecapping their hardware so that they can continue to "improve" the hardware in subsequent revisions, giving people a reason to upgrade (if they built a phone that people actually wanted to the quality you'd expect from a premium device, everyone would have the same phone for 5-10 years and that's bad for business). It's guaranteed Apple will release the 7S (or iPhone 8) and tout the new and improved battery life like it's some sort of miracle.

      Likewise, slim devices are subject to more mechanical stress than a fat phone. This too is great for hardware manufactures because it means the phone will more reliably fail once the warranty is expired. Good luck keeping an iPhone 7 around for 5 years (or longer).

      It's not about you. It's about planned and forced obsolescence, and nothing else.

    5. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would personally love a phone with a slightly thicker handset that uses the extra thickness to double my battery life. I'm thinking for an extra 2mm I could probably get 30% to 40% more battery life. Now that would be a feature. And don't mess with my headphone jack, I own $400 closed back headphones and when you lose the jack, I will NOT consider your product.

    6. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by msauve · · Score: 2

      "Why do they keep thinking they need to be thinner?"

      They don't (necessarily think that). It's a bullshit marketing excuse for removing a 25 cent part, then selling you something to replace it to make another $5 in profit. Same with the water resistant BS - it's no harder to make a waterproof 3.5 jack than it is to make a waterproof USB one. The concept is identical.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how the latest waterproof phones still have moisture strips on the battery... like it's my fault that the air is humid and so the warranty doesnt apply.

    8. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by macs4all · · Score: 1

      "Why do they keep thinking they need to be thinner?" They don't (necessarily think that). It's a bullshit marketing excuse for removing a 25 cent part, then selling you something to replace it to make another $5 in profit. Same with the water resistant BS - it's no harder to make a waterproof 3.5 jack than it is to make a waterproof USB one. The concept is identical.

      You're wrong on both counts. Gasketed connectors are both bulky and failure-prone. Period.

    9. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I never thought I'd say this, but after being reminded for the ten thousandth time by some puerile, unoriginal moron online that Trump has small hands, I've decided I'm going to vote for Hillary instead. You've really convinced me. #ImWithHer

    10. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by msauve · · Score: 1

      I await the iPhone 8, with no external connections.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    11. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It's actually much simpler to waterproof the standard 3.5 mm mini jack, or even the newfangled "TRRS" jack.

    12. Re: We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU we know you love buying new iphones so you can put the old one inside of your ass

    13. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Why do they keep thinking they need to be thinner? Please help me understand."

      Less material + more fragile tech gadget = more profits, you're under the dangerous illusion corporations exist to do anything other then make profit, they don't exist to benefit the environment, or improve your society, they exist only to make money if that means the world is becoming a garbage dump that's not their concern. Like you kids in america never fucking learn a god damn thing about how real world capitalism operates, its such a damn near religion down there you're blind to the truth. Just because and organisation is making money and producing stuff for you does not mean net positive things are happening for the global commons of the planet or the population.

    14. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is just hilarious when hipsters try to boast how thin their new phones are. And on next day they hide them into some ugly and thick cover since the phones do not last keeping them in a pocket.

    15. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      such a mature response, typical of iphone worshippers

    16. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know the old saying "It's better to be thought the fool than prove it." Well, you're proof.

    17. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      It's a bullshit marketing excuse for removing a 25 cent part, then selling you something to replace it to make another $5 in profit. Same with the water resistant BS - it's no harder to make a waterproof 3.5 jack than it is to make a waterproof USB one.

      yes, this is it exactly, you nailed it...don't heed anyone telling you otherwise

      this is *exactly* what is happening

      and no, we don't need slimmer phones, no one is clamoring for it

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    18. Re: We don't need slimmer phones by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      I love my "ugly" fat Samsung Light thank you very much. I am very reluctant to upgrade it because 1) It is hard to find a decent phone with the same screen size which is small, because the larger now standard size is a pain in the ass for me to carry in my pocket. Despite the age of the phone, the hardware is quite good, and still works as well at running apps as my brand new tablet 2) I have it rooted and actualy use it as a pocket computer and I even have compilers installed on it so I use it to program (as a hobby), and have unfettered access to the underlying unix enviroment Android is built on 3) The battery is removeable/replaceable 4) It is quite sturdy and has been through some very rough handling (no drops, but still has taken quite a bit of punishment). Unfortunately, a single hairline crack developed in the glass last night, but it was because I accidently bumped up hard against something where my phone was in my pocket. The LCD and digitizer is fine, and looking dead on at the screen when it is on, I can't even see the crack, but I am still a bit freaked about it. Sorry, but I think I will be hanging on to my phone until scotch tape and chewing gum can no longer hold it together.

    19. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wrong on both counts. Gasketed connectors are both bulky and failure-prone. Period.

      Interesting use of the word "wrong", since you clearly disagree with his statement that making a water-proof USB connector is just as hard as a water-proof audio jack.

    20. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      My Droid Turbo is 11.2mm thick and I added a velcro strip to the back making it even thicker. (The velcro allows me to attach it to vertical surfaces instead of taking up space on my desk.)

      It's thin enough even with the velcro.

      I'm not going to upgrade it anytime soon (despite no Marshmallow) but neither Apple or Samsung are looking very likely as replacements. Motorola is probably out too since they seem to think I'm fine with Android 5.1 on this one. (Or that I'll buy a new one? Ha!)

      My new kitten might convince me to get wireless headphones though.

    21. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Fandroids never lash out with non-sequitur and classless insults.

    22. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Malc · · Score: 1

      What are talking about? Phones are massive these days. The current iPhones range from 113 to 192g. My last non-smart phone weighed about 80g, and was also tiny in comparison - more than 30% smaller because components weren't as light.

      The thiness of the current phones also allows to have a larger flat surface to work with, so actually thinness isn't the thing you should be complaining about. My tiny phone I had before had far less area dedicated to the keypad, and I don't really miss having to type every multiple times to write a text.

      I do miss though the days when you could get a decent phone that you barely noticed was in your pockets.

    23. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Maritz · · Score: 1

      What a dark world you must live in. Much like your mother's basement, I'd imagine...

      Did I see you have a go at someone elsewhere in this thread for peurile insults? lol.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    24. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's not about you. It's about planned and forced obsolescence, and nothing else.

      These phones have been breaking over and over again and manufacturers have been going out of their way to invest in more durable better glass, less bendyness etc. Phones are super fragile as they are and being sold in contracts with "free" (that's free as in not free at all) upgrades doesn't mean they have an issue with obsolescence. The upgrade cycle for most people already has a 2 year maximum on it, and quite a lot break before then anyway.

    25. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Or you could, you know, grow the fuck up, instead of making such a big show out of pretending not to be butthurt. Just a thought.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    26. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You didn't just inhale, you drank the bong water afterwards, too, didn't you?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    27. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For some reason I read that as #ImWithHiter

      Freudian?

    28. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A lot of people do care about water resistance, because apparently water damage is the number one cause of smart phone death. Particularly people dropping the phone in the toilet (from the back pocket I guess) or spilling drinks on it.

      LG look to be getting the message. The V20 has a removable back, SD card socket, good size removable battery and mostly stock OS. Hopefully they will offer a replacement back with wireless charging, as LG often do. Unfortunately it's not waterproof though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on both counts. Gasketed connectors are both bulky and failure-prone. Period.

      Interesting use of the word "wrong", since you clearly disagree with his statement that making a water-proof USB connector is just as hard as a water-proof audio jack.

      Perhaps I was being too hasty, posting from work.

      But, as you no doubt know, what I meant was that a 3.5 mm gasketed (o-ring-equipped) connector is more bulky than a non-gasketed 3.5 mm connector, and they have a history of failing over time. PLUS, 3.5 mm connectors are much harder to waterproof than leaf-contact-type connectors, like Lightning or USB, where the backside of the leaf-contacts can simply be sealed with epoxy or other plastic.

    30. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You didn't just inhale, you drank the bong water afterwards, too, didn't you?

      Really? Someone posts a multi-paragraph, paranoia-inspired rant, which I countered with a simple observation regarding their negative world-view, and a slightly-snarky single-sentence comment concerning their possible domicile, and I'M the bad guy?!?

    31. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, ho, ho, ho, hoooooo! Look at this! You're always crying like a little bitch about people making "ad hominem" attacks against you. Yet here you are, trolling like the asshole you truly are. Bookmarked!

    32. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on both counts. Gasketed connectors are both bulky and failure-prone. Period.

      Interesting use of the word "wrong", since you clearly disagree with his statement that making a water-proof USB connector is just as hard as a water-proof audio jack.

      Perhaps I was being too hasty, posting from work. But, as you no doubt know, what I meant was that a 3.5 mm gasketed (o-ring-equipped) connector is more bulky than a non-gasketed 3.5 mm connector, and they have a history of failing over time. PLUS, 3.5 mm connectors are much harder to waterproof than leaf-contact-type connectors, like Lightning or USB, where the backside of the leaf-contacts can simply be sealed with epoxy or other plastic.

      But why do they all of a sudden have to be waterproof? Who decided that was a must have feature? Are apple following sony?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    33. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even a screen. Just a machined aluminium block.

    34. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pool phones don't help sales because people prone to pool phone don't buy an expense phone immediately, which can actually break the sales cycle. The peace of mind that you can get your phone wet is worth far more than the few additional sales they might get from drowned phones.

      I mean it makes no sense to engineer an inferior product hoping it will break more often and expecting people to pay the premium price. People will pay for quality products that last longer than cheaper products.

      While YOU don't care about water, I do and most people do for many reasons: sweat, rain, accidents (water glass spills, drunk person spills beer, dropped in toilet, drop in puddle, any other scenario that involves liquid), going to a pool without worrying about finding the perfect place to stash the phone so it doesn't get wet and won't be stolen.

      I don't want to swim with it, I just want it protected from water in the hundreds of situations I encounter every year where there is a chance of water destroying the phone. People take their phone everywhere. If the risk is 10% a year, which is probably fair for most people, that is worth $120 on a $600 phone that you keep for two years.

    35. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this analysis. Everyone talks about the slimness and cases and acts as if Apple released a thicker phone people would suddenly stop putting a case on it. People are going to put a case on the phone because they want to protect their investment and they want to express their personality.

      If they just made the phone thicker, then majority adding the case would not be happy with the resulting thickness. Thinner phones also means lighter phones, when combines with a case, and means less drop damage. Less drop damage means happier customers. Customers who upgrade by choice are much more likely to pick the same product than those who upgrade because the product failed.

      A lot of the phones that are breaking because they are "too thin" are being used by idiots who think they can sit on a tablet sized phone all day in a back pocket, with no case, and expect it to hold up. You may claim that people should be able to do this but I can't think of any other product short of a piece of raw steel that could hold up to this. Basic logic and experience in this world would indicate that you can't sit you 200 pound ass on something all day and expect it to not break over time. Making it thicker might help if all the additions to thickness are in the frame but if the additions are in battery then its not going to help.

    36. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why you're not modded to 5 Insightful, but you've definitely hit the nail on the head here.

    37. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on both counts. Gasketed connectors are both bulky and failure-prone. Period.

      Interesting use of the word "wrong", since you clearly disagree with his statement that making a water-proof USB connector is just as hard as a water-proof audio jack.

      Perhaps I was being too hasty, posting from work. But, as you no doubt know, what I meant was that a 3.5 mm gasketed (o-ring-equipped) connector is more bulky than a non-gasketed 3.5 mm connector, and they have a history of failing over time. PLUS, 3.5 mm connectors are much harder to waterproof than leaf-contact-type connectors, like Lightning or USB, where the backside of the leaf-contacts can simply be sealed with epoxy or other plastic.

      But why do they all of a sudden have to be waterproof? Who decided that was a must have feature? Are apple following sony?

      No, they're following the "What features would I want on my phone?" research.

      A phone is a mobile device. Mobile devices called Smartphines are expensive. mobile devices called Smartphones are absolutely essential to some people. Mobile devices have a hard life. Many mobile devices meet a permanent and premature demise through accidental immersion in water. Therefore, having reasonable water-resistance in a Smartphone Mobile device is undeniably a desirable feature to many people. Seriously, how can you even ask this question?

    38. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Right, I get that phones get wet and that kills them. That's a no brainer but that doesn't mean every phone needs waterproofing at the expense of other features, many more phones have cracked screens or die from impact drops yet they continue the thinness quest. How many phones have you lost to water damage? For me it's none because I realise my phone is a sensitive electronic device and I take care of it around water sources. Many a laptop have also died from water damage, why aren't they all of a sudden being waterproofed? You act as if there weren't waterproof phones before that people could get if that was an important feature for them, now that apple are doing it it's all of a sudden almost the most vital part.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    39. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Right, I get that phones get wet and that kills them. That's a no brainer but that doesn't mean every phone needs waterproofing at the expense of other features, many more phones have cracked screens or die from impact drops yet they continue the thinness quest. How many phones have you lost to water damage? For me it's none because I realise my phone is a sensitive electronic device and I take care of it around water sources. Many a laptop have also died from water damage, why aren't they all of a sudden being waterproofed? You act as if there weren't waterproof phones before that people could get if that was an important feature for them, now that apple are doing it it's all of a sudden almost the most vital part.

      I had my iPhone 4s ALMOST die from a single well-aimed raindrop that entered through, curiously-enough, the top-mounted 3.5 mm Jack. I immediately shook it out as best as possible; but the phone was all sorts of crazy. I used my car heater to blow warm air into the Jack, and after about 30 terrifying minutes and a reboot, it seemed to recover. Close call. Too close. And if I'd been a Normal, I probably wouldn't have known to act as quickly and correctly as I did, and perhaps that would have been that.

      You say that not every phone needs to be waterproof; but I disagree. And when it happens to you, you'll understand.

    40. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The waterproofing itself is all so well and so good as a feature, more of an insurance thing, that's fair enough but there's no reason it has to cost the jack is my main point. Before this phone I have now I had an xperia z, waterproof and has a jack, the current samsung is waterproof and has a jack. If you'd have been on one of the iphones with a jack on the bottom you would have been perfectly fine without even the need of waterproofing.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    41. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by noodler · · Score: 1

      That sounds much more like an underdevelopd technology than any real engineering challenge.
      I mean, do you seriously want us to believe that putting a box around something is terribly difficult?
      How thick does such a gasket really need to be? 0.5mm? Wow, that would really bulk up that connector. Not.

    42. Re:We don't need slimmer phones by caseih · · Score: 1

      I agree about size bloat!

      But for me, yes thinness is an issue. Larger phones might make up for it in some way but I find it difficult to grasp the thin phones by their edges in a secure way, especially if I'm in a risky place like somewhere high or over water. And I used to like holding my phone with my shoulder while I switch something in my hands. I'd be it could be a challenge for even 20 year olds.

      But no fear, with my new Apple bluetooth earbuds I can have a hands free experience now. Wake me up when we all put a insignia on our chests and just use that. Except that you can't text on it very well. How did Star Trek get that so wrong!?

  4. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they do, I wont be buying it.

  5. They removed it for "safety" reasons. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They decided to FULLY enclose the exploding batteries now. Maybe that will fix it. Yep.

  6. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rash of paper cut injuries are striking owners of headphone jackless Samsung phones. Wear gloves!

    1. Re: In other news.... by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

      Cool, now it doubles as a lethal razor sharp throwing star! I always wanted to be a ninja!

  7. Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by DaveM753 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that this is an example of corporations quite clearly forcing consumers into something they don't want. They only way to stop them is to NOT buy these devices.

    I have 2 older iPods, a smartphone, a surround sound a/v receiver, CD players, MP3 players, ancient transistor radios, etc., and NONE of them work with USB headphones. All of them work with standard audio jacks. I'm not investing in new headphones, dongles, cables, etc.

    1. Re: Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not their target market.

    2. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by macs4all · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that this is an example of corporations quite clearly forcing consumers into something they don't want. They only way to stop them is to NOT buy these devices.

      I have 2 older iPods, a smartphone, a surround sound a/v receiver, CD players, MP3 players, ancient transistor radios, etc., and NONE of them work with USB headphones. All of them work with standard audio jacks. I'm not investing in new headphones, dongles, cables, etc.

      Not even when they come for free (just like those 1/4" to 1/8" headphone adapters that have been shipping with many headphones for about the last 20 years?)?

    3. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      No. Samsung simply copy-paste Apple.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re: Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck their target market. I'm tired of them screwing up everything.

    5. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      And then everyone else copy-pastes Samsung. It's infuriating. What's the point of competition when there's no real choice?

    6. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some time ago I saw advertising for a device that stressed it had no SD card slot, like that was some sort of feature. The message was 'this device is also hip'...

    7. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      I've owned two Apple phones and a Samsung, and I've never used the headphone jack on any of them. So from my perspective, I was forced into having a feature that I never asked for.

    8. Re:Are consumers REALLY asking for this? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      They only way to stop them is to NOT buy these devices.

      I see this backfiring at Samsung. Apple users have no choice. They can either buy Apple or abandon the platform. Android users have plenty of choice and I think users may vote with their wallet on something like this.

  8. We don't want this.... by jef41305739 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dear Samsung. Please stop with the thin war and start the "real 24 hour battery" war. Phones have been plenty thin for years.... thicken them back up and put a fatter battery in there. What have people dealt with more than anything? A freaking dead battery. I want a phone that will run like a raped ape on a flight from Dallas to Sydney on a single charge and still be above 35% battery. We want our head phone jacks.. I charge my phone and use my headphones at the same time about every night. My wired headphones have lasted for +8 years now. Are there any 8 year old wireless headphones still rocking it or have they had battery issues? Which then brings up an environmental arrangement... this ramps up the number of old batteries that will get dumped in landfills over time. We all see the removal of the headphone jack for what it really is... a way to force people to purchase something they didn't need in the first place... a dick move like that is something like Apple would do. Just how waterproof are you wanting a phone to be? Are you hoping to corner the "action camera" market? Regards. Jef

    1. Re:We don't want this.... by SuseLover · · Score: 1
      Exactly why I bought an iPhone 5s instead of the 6s. The 6 just felt too flimsey and the 5's dual cpu's are plenty of horsepower.

      And I love the performance of my wired JVC noise cancelling headphones, you won't find a better value for the performance of these at ~$120.

    2. Re:We don't want this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So buy a Sony phone, they were going down this path, but no-one was buying them.

    3. Re:We don't want this.... by 4im · · Score: 2

      Why only 24h? Back in the ol' days, our "feature phones" (think Nokia N95) easily held out several days, if not an entire week. Simpler phones remained usable for a couple of weeks, on a single charge.

      Having to charge every other day, when you have multiple such devices (think phone, tablet, fitness band/watch, etc.) that you have to do it for a whole batch of stuff, every night! No thanks! I can't even stand cordless keyboard/mouse as they'll crap out at the worst possible times...

    4. Re:We don't want this.... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      We passed the "real 24 hour battery" mark at least a year ago. Marshmallow introduced Doze and my OnePlus One went from a solid day to three days on a charge, or a week of standby. Nugat takes it even further. My battery is 3200mAh IIRC.

      I recently did a bit of video watching and many hours of audio book listening over Bluetooth on a 12 hour flight, landed with over 60% remaining.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:We don't want this.... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Introducing...the Samsung Leaf!!! So thin, you can roll it up and smoke it!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:We don't want this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post--perfect summary of my feelings as well. Except I prefer the iOS to Android, and it's exactly these points that may push me from Apple to an Android phone next purchase.

    7. Re:We don't want this.... by GrumpyNope · · Score: 1

      So buy a 3.5mm to USB C adapter that will cost you maybe $5. No one is forcing you or anyone else to buy bluetooth headphones.

    8. Re:We don't want this.... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Still not as good as ol' Longbottom Leaf... :)

    9. Re:We don't want this.... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      So hot, it lights itself! :)

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    10. Re:We don't want this.... by nwaack · · Score: 1

      So buy a 3.5mm to USB C adapter that will cost you maybe $5. No one is forcing you or anyone else to buy bluetooth headphones.

      False. I will not spend money to have an extra chunk of plastic hanging off my phone just so that I can make sound come out of it. What I will be doing is spending money on a phone with a damn headphone jack.

    11. Re: We don't want this.... by GrumpyNope · · Score: 1

      Hell you might not even have to buy one it might come with the device.

  9. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

    1. Re:In other news... by youngone · · Score: 1

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

    2. Re:In other news... by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

    3. Re:In other news... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

      That is not how capitalism works. If the demand is there, there will be jacked cellphones for a long time.

    4. Re:In other news... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      You're just here to sneer, I take it. Motherfucker.

      Don't die in a fire. The toxic fumes might kill a family of skunks.

    5. Re:In other news... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

      Well, I guess that means no more new expensive phones for me. If they don't do what I want it's back to dumb phones. Actually I'd be half suprised if apple didn't turn around sue because they have a patent on single port design or someshit. Don't forget there's no samsung reality distortion field. Them trying to do what apple does won't work as well because they won't be defended to the hilt regardless of what they do, It might sell a few but watch them put the jack back in next model. It's the sd card slot all over again.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    6. Re:In other news... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's true. That's why it's still very easy to buy a high-end phone with user-replaceable batteries.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:In other news... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

      I know you really want all manufacturers to make the stupid, selfish decision that your masters made, but reality isn't going to conform to your desires on this occasion. Sorry bud.

      I will keep on buying phones with 3.5mm jacks for the foreseeable future, want to fucking bet?

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    8. Re:In other news... by macs4all · · Score: 2

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

      I know you really want all manufacturers to make the stupid, selfish decision that your masters made, but reality isn't going to conform to your desires on this occasion. Sorry bud.

      I will keep on buying phones with 3.5mm jacks for the foreseeable future, want to fucking bet?

      Yep. Because it has been proven tine and again that, where Apple leads, the others follow. Period. That's not fanboy-ism; that's History Repeating.

    9. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, it's still very easy to find a high-end phone with a user replaceable battery and microSD slot. My LG G5 has both (and of course a headphone jack).

    10. Re:In other news... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Samsung might, but there are and still will be plenty of phones sold specifically because they're not apple offering the exact things as selling points that apple remove.

      I'm curious though exactly where apple have led that everyone followed? They didn't have the first of anything really, at best what they've done is taken some existing things, made them all swishy and brought popularity. OK the iPod may have changed the market for the better (not iTunes though) but I don't see anyone really copying apple in anything more than superficial ways, even MS' apparent quest for an apple like surge is only skin deep. The only place they seem to be truly leading is as an online shop, everything else they make just serves to funnel customers to that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    11. Re:In other news... by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      This is why I stick with Galaxy 3 with cyanogemod :P

    12. Re:In other news... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that means no more new expensive phones for me. If they don't do what I want it's back to dumb phones.

      The most ironic statement I've heard yet.

      Remember to turn off the light on yer way out the door.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:In other news... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yep. Because it has been proven tine and again that, where Apple leads, the others follow. Period. That's not fanboy-ism; that's History Repeating.

      Because it only makes sense. That little headphone jack that is apparently the single most important device ever developed in the universe, the device that at least one guy here says he'll go to a dumb phone if he can't have one - well, the headphone jack is a stinking piece of shit that has been around waaay past it's useful lifetime. I've had so many devices rendered useless because of a failure of that part, and have replaced dozens of them over the years.

      But please jack lovers, give us some more of your special case stories where having a 3.5 mm phone jack saved the universe. Then we promise to get off your lawns.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:In other news... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Yep. Because it has been proven tine and again that, where Apple leads, the others follow. Period. That's not fanboy-ism; that's History Repeating.

      Because it only makes sense. That little headphone jack that is apparently the single most important device ever developed in the universe, the device that at least one guy here says he'll go to a dumb phone if he can't have one - well, the headphone jack is a stinking piece of shit that has been around waaay past it's useful lifetime. I've had so many devices rendered useless because of a failure of that part, and have replaced dozens of them over the years.

      But please jack lovers, give us some more of your special case stories where having a 3.5 mm phone jack saved the universe. Then we promise to get off your lawns.

      What I loved were the people that argued that Apple should just switch to. 2.5 mm Jack. Not only does this not solve the "adapter" "problem"; but if there is anything more intermittent than a 3.5 mm Jack, it's a 2.5 mm Jack! So, spectacular idea!!!

    15. Re:In other news... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that means no more new expensive phones for me. If they don't do what I want it's back to dumb phones.

      The most ironic statement I've heard yet.

      Remember to turn off the light on yer way out the door.

      How is that ironic? If something doesn't have a feature I want I won't get it? I want a phone that can double as an mp3 playing, using my headphones I already have and like without having to replace them with more expensive, inconvenient ones. But yeah, sure, I'll turn the light off, all you guys seem happy enough bumbling around in the dark anyway.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    16. Re:In other news... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that means no more new expensive phones for me. If they don't do what I want it's back to dumb phones.

      The most ironic statement I've heard yet.

      Remember to turn off the light on yer way out the door.

      How is that ironic? If something doesn't have a feature I want I won't get it? I want a phone that can double as an mp3 playing, using my headphones I already have and like without having to replace them with more expensive, inconvenient ones. But yeah, sure, I'll turn the light off, all you guys seem happy enough bumbling around in the dark anyway.

      You are going to give up damn near everything because of a phone jack. If that isn't ironic, that your not understanding that is ironic as well.

      But I'm here to help. There are some phones I've seen on TV that are aimed at Senior Citizens, real simple, and the most important part is they have that headphone jack that appears to be the most important feature. I think they play MP3's. But even if they don't, they have a headphone jack.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:In other news... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yep. Because it has been proven tine and again that, where Apple leads, the others follow. Period. That's not fanboy-ism; that's History Repeating.

      Because it only makes sense. That little headphone jack that is apparently the single most important device ever developed in the universe, the device that at least one guy here says he'll go to a dumb phone if he can't have one - well, the headphone jack is a stinking piece of shit that has been around waaay past it's useful lifetime. I've had so many devices rendered useless because of a failure of that part, and have replaced dozens of them over the years.

      But please jack lovers, give us some more of your special case stories where having a 3.5 mm phone jack saved the universe. Then we promise to get off your lawns.

      What I loved were the people that argued that Apple should just switch to. 2.5 mm Jack. Not only does this not solve the "adapter" "problem"; but if there is anything more intermittent than a 3.5 mm Jack, it's a 2.5 mm Jack! So, spectacular idea!!!

      Gotta remember though, these are people who wouldn't buy an iPhone anyhow. So their outrage in all matters is a little off.

      Just like their apocrypha stories.

      But it will be all good when Samsung and the others have eliminated theirs.

      After all, what is a plug in headset but a huge dongle?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re:In other news... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Yup, it's true. That's why it's still very easy to buy a high-end phone with user-replaceable batteries.

      Indeed. There are dozens to choose from. Here is a list. Here are many more.

    19. Re: In other news... by thundercattt · · Score: 1

      I refuse to by Samsung phones anyway. Had 3 in the past and they never last longer then 14 months. S2 (3 mobo replacements) Rugby 2 (mobo died at mth 14, got cheap refurbished from additional warranty) and S3 crapped out. Moved to the Nexus line, no issues. Nexus 5 still going strong. Samsung has become that cheap BestBuy brand That's always on sale like HP. Where you swear they use used parts on it.

    20. Re:In other news... by green1 · · Score: 1

      I had already decided that, this just reinforces it.

      I have been loyal to the Note line of phones for a long time (since they were basically the only choice for a large screen phone). But first they got rid of the replaceable battery and sd card, and made the back out of the sliperiest material they could find, then they made it impossible to hold without performing unintended touch operations with the ridiculous "edge" screen, and now they're getting rid of the headphone jack. and I gather they're also now locking their bootloaders down.

      I like the stylus on the note line of phones, but it's not enough to make me put up with all the other disadvantages. Not sure yet what my next phone will be, but it's highly unlikely to be a Samsung with all the downgrades they've made to their devices recently.

    21. Re:In other news... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's what I want from my phone. 1)Phone and text. 2)internet browser 3)Music player and headphone jack. Until now all those things were basically a given on any phone. Yeah I probably wouldnt get a straight up old school dumb phone, but a lowend smart phone. If literally every phone drops the jack I'll just have to go back to carrying a seperate music player. But that ain't going to happen.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    22. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung's Next Flagship Smartphone May Not Be Purchased by Me

      I won't buy one either, and I have only ever had Samsung phones. I'm not worried though, there are lots of Android phone model available, and one of them will suit me just fine.

      And every stinkin' one that you'll want to buy will be jackless by the next model rev.

      Well, I guess that means no more new expensive phones for me. If they don't do what I want it's back to dumb phones.

      Nobody cares. Seriously, your views are so statistically negligible that you don’t even represent a rounding error.

    23. Re: In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine's about 1.5 years old and I can replace the battery, so...

    24. Re: In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't they say that about SD cards? But I heard Samsung U-turned on that...

      Quit trying to make it a fait accompli just to support Apple's dumb money-wasting decision.

    25. Re:In other news... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Okay, here's what I want from my phone. 1)Phone and text. 2)internet browser 3)Music player and headphone jack. Until now all those things were basically a given on any phone. Yeah I probably wouldnt get a straight up old school dumb phone, but a lowend smart phone. If literally every phone drops the jack I'll just have to go back to carrying a seperate music player. But that ain't going to happen.

      Tell me, what would you do with a wired headphone that uses some other wire? The defense of the lowly and dmage prone 3.5 mm jack and teh seemingly inability of any other method of connection being acceptable to y'all makes me wonder. It really is a poor connecting method for the incredible outpouring of hatred towards anything else. It is the 14.4 k modem speed version of a connector to make a professional comparison.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    26. Re:In other news... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      No, just no. Listen, you buy whatever you want and I'll do the same and lets just leave it at that.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    27. Re:In other news... by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't actually say anything about Samsung removing the 3.5mm jack, only that usb analog audio with be standard and easier to do.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    28. Re:In other news... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Funny, I still can get laptops with optical drives, and desktops with floppy drives and parallel ports. Where have others actually followed Apple?

      You are missing that there are hundreds of Android manufacturers. You are asserting that none of them will have a headphone port. That is moronic in the extreme. You are dictating that it isn't needed, just like SD cards, which many phones still have.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    29. Re:In other news... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      Funny, I still can get laptops with optical drives, and desktops with floppy drives and parallel ports. Where have others actually followed Apple?

      You are missing that there are hundreds of Android manufacturers. You are asserting that none of them will have a headphone port. That is moronic in the extreme. You are dictating that it isn't needed, just like SD cards, which many phones still have.

      The only way to get a desktop with a floppy drive is to build it yourself. Same with a parallel port. And a laptop with a parallel port? Not!

      Laptops with optical drives are likely still available; but the options are getting very much less year after year.

      Same thing with phones with analog headphone jacks. You will likely be able to find A phone or three with a 3.5 mm Jack for the next few years; but if Apple and Samsung both ditch that port, all the flagship models for all OEMs, regardless of platform, will soon follow suit. So after that, if you feel you MUST have that Jack, you'll more than likely be relegated to an old model, or some sketchy off-brand phone. None of the "good" phones will have it. If you call that "choice", then ok...

    30. Re:In other news... by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Sure you can.

      http://accessories.dell.com/sn...
      http://accessories.dell.com/sn...
      http://accessories.dell.com/sn...

      See, the key thing you are missing is that flagship =/= all phones. There will always be ways to get what you want. You are comparing all phones that a manufacturer makes to 2 or 3 of their phones. Samsung makes much more than the S7 and Note 7.

      http://www.samsung.com/us/mobi...

      Why would they suddenly reduce their selection to kill off a port that is very popular? You seem to be equating the Apple way with every other company, when it is rather obtuse to do so. No, Apple doesn't lead the industry, they are routinely 1-2 years behind the rest of the industry. Removing the analog port is a money grab and nothing else. You can keep denying it all you like, but it doesn't change the facts around it.

      Did you even bother to read TFA? This is all Wild Ass Speculation (tm), not actual fact, or even an announcement. You are taking rumor as fact, nothing says that Samsung will sell 0 phones in 5 years with a headphone port, and in fact that would be absurd to expect to happen.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    31. Re:In other news... by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I didn't say you couldn't buy a card or docking station with those ports; but that isn't the same and you know it.

  10. Thanks apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for nothing

    1. Re:Thanks apple. by macs4all · · Score: 1

      for nothing

      Oh so now it's Apple's fault?

      Right on schedule!

    2. Re:Thanks apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's Apple's fault. If they wouldn't have removed the phono jack, then Samsung wouldn't have been compelled to copy!

    3. Re:Thanks apple. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Apple are in fact the outfit that started this particular race to the bottom, so Yes, we do in fact blame Apple.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  11. Asus by phorm · · Score: 2

    I have an S5. Good phone. Removable battery. Wateproof/resistant. SD card. Headphone jack.
    My wife has an Asus Zenfone2. Also good with all up the above except the waterproofing. Also cheaper.

    Samsung kills the headphone jack, guess which brand *my* next phone will be.

    1. Re:Asus by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Apple? /ducks

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:Asus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty happy with my Huawei, $400 for a phone with 8cores, 32 GB storage, 4GB RAM and a commitment to update it for the next 2 yrs. USB-C and HeadPhone jack included.

  12. No choice by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Samsung has no choice here. As the only real competitor to Apple, they can't be left with 40 year old analog technology while the rest of the industry is tripping over themselves to make audio hardware that supports the Lightning connector, which Apple exclusively controls all the licensing for. If Samsung does not remove the analog audio jack, then there will not be a large enough market for a micro-USB digital audio competitor to Apple's Lightning. The only way to get manufacturers to produce enough USB audio devices is to create a large market (and thus a low enough price point to compete with Lightning audio devices), only Samsung moves enough Android handsets to do that, and it has to be done by removing the analog audio jack. Apple has already caught Samsung flat-footed here, and there is going to be a significant delay until companies start producing micro-USB audio hardware. The Lightening audio market will be flourishing (if it isn't already) before Samsung even gets the devices to market.

    Android devices will also face an issue with compatibility. Micro-USB does not by default support powering peripherals. That is what USB On-The-Go (OTG) is for. What this means is that micro-USB headphones will not work on all Android devices, because not all devices support OTG. Especially older ones and the cheap tablet market. That fragmentation will result in a negative impression of Android for some people (these new micro-USB headphones work with my wife's Android phone, but not my tablet - how come?).

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or they could just keep the analog headphone jack that everyone on earth wants them to keep except for Apple fanatics.

    2. Re:No choice by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      What stops them from supporting both a headphone jack and adding USB-C headphone support? NOTHING...

      I disagree with the assertion that Samsung NEEDS to push USB-C devices. I.m pretty sure that there are plenty of other uses beyond cell phones... The business environment is much larger than Samsung and a lot of Corps have gone to VoIP which require headsets.

    3. Re:No choice by mark-t · · Score: 1

      40 years? Even if you were talking only about the 3.5mm jack specifically, try over 60. It was commonly used to connect an earpiece to transistor radios since the early 1950's, and the 1/4" phono jack, the same one that is still in use today, predated that by an additional 70 or 80 years, so you're talking about a tech that is well over a century old here.

    4. Re:No choice by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      From a technical standpoint, what is stopping manufacturers from creating Micro-USB or USB-C headphones now? Nothing. So why aren't there many to choose from? There is no incentive because there is no market. That's what I'm talking about, is Samsung creating a market for those devices. Unless the market is forced, it will not exist, and Samsung phones will not have a vibrant market of digital audio peripherals for their customers, yet Apple will. It's an arms race that Apple is winning, and that Samsung must play if they want to stay in the game.

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    5. Re:No choice by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've never figured out that "40 year old analog technology" angle. My Mark-1 ears are also 40 year old analogy technology, so I think they match up just fine.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    6. Re:No choice by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'm not following why Samsung can't be left with the only technology that is optimum for what it needs to do.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    7. Re:No choice by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Your ears are only 40 years old? What sort of nerd are ya? :) You should be able to pick up some genuine Spock ears from the ST-TOS online.

    8. Re:No choice by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can say personally I would never buy USB or lightning headphones. Why? Because I have 20 devices around my house that work with 3.5mm jacks. So until I can find a USB headphone that comes with 20 USB to 3.5mm converters, plus some extra for me to lose, they'll need to wait 15 years or more for me to replace all the devices I have already.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:No choice by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Samsung DOES have a choice. WTF are you babbling about? Samsung can do whatever they want, but can still leave the 3.5 mm jack in place.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    10. Re:No choice by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that Apple has introduced the VHS deck, and Samsung should hustle right now to come out with a BetaMax? That's how it translates to me. Except it's a VHS deck that doesn't record video, or do anything at all useful.

      But Samsung should hustle to become the second best alternative?

    11. Re:No choice by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to "force" a market that has been possible for years but consumers clearly have no interest in? How would this benefit Samsung?

      Who cares if Apple forces an MFI-only digital audio ecosystem, when the existing audio ecosystem is a thousand times bigger? If it eventually turns out that digital headphones are awesome then vendors will inevitably sell them for USB as well (which is a far larger market). Phone manufacturers could happily bundle them too, with no other changes and no need to alienate the 99% of consumers with existing analogue equipment.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    12. Re:No choice by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot to think that Samsung has no choice but to fuck over consumers.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    13. Re:No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monkey see, monkey do. No choice indeed.

    14. Re: No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a notion to ponder: the headphone jack doesn't know how old its design is. Neither do the headphones. Why does the age of the original tech matter when there is absolutely nothing wrong with it?

      Let me define that term: nothing wrong with it means that any replacement tech being considered or implemented has serious disadvantages relative to both the older tech and to the functionality intended.

      In English: digital headphones do not sound better and have all kinds of problems like taking up the port you use for charging and also of course requiring a stupid dongle to work with anything else. Wireless headphones sound worse, are ejvironmentally polluting, and require charging of their own.

      The best one can possibly hope for with this is to have headphones that MIGHT approach the quality of the 3.5mm ones one day, coupled with massive disadvantages. Given that wireless headphones already exist for those who want them, this change is absolute crap for users.

    15. Re:No choice by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Well, for one thing, the audio standard for USB-C was just ratified. It's right there in TFS!

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    16. Re:No choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      they can't be left with 40 year old analog technology

      As opposed to all those digital headphones that feature such wonderful innovations such as ... a different connector and a higher price?

    17. Re:No choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If Samsung does not remove the analog audio jack, then there will not be a large enough market for a micro-USB digital audio competitor to Apple's Lightning. The only way to get manufacturers to produce enough USB audio devices is to create a large market (and thus a low enough price point to compete with Lightning audio devices), only Samsung moves enough Android handsets to do that, and it has to be done by removing the analog audio jack.

      Good. USB audio should die. Let Apple fanbois have their expensive hardware. Most of the world is perfectly happy with headphones the way they are and if there's a complaint about the connection it's the connection in the first place. Having a 3.5mm jack doesn't stop the ability to support wireless.

      If they remove the 3.5mm jack than my long relationship with Samsung phones will have come to an end. Apple users are locked in. Samsung users are not and there are many Android alternatives.

    18. Re:No choice by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Forks and knives represent millenia-old technology, yet we don't perceive a need to "improve" upon them.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    19. Re:No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of those Insightful mods came from macs4all & sockpuppets?

    20. Re:No choice by dwillden · · Score: 1

      In that poor example Betamax was better (and came first) but VHS marketed better so it won out.

      In this case the humble but very effective audio jack was here first, it's universally installed and it's better. Apple thinks they can out market it ala VHS, but unlike Betamax and VHS which both hit the market fairly close together, the audio jack is ubiquitous not fighting to establish a market, and unlike apple introducing the 3.5 inch floppy versus the 5.25 inch floppy (a far better analogue than VHS/Betamax), the new tech is not actually better than the universally used current tech.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    21. Re:No choice by DethLok · · Score: 1

      Seriously? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Just drink your 3 daily meals, no forks, knives or plates. Eatin' irons done be replaced, boy, I say, boy! DethLok

    22. Re:No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying that if Samsung *don't* remove a key feature it'll be bad for their business??

    23. Re:No choice by pastafazou · · Score: 1

      Finally a comment that's actually deserving of being moderated +5 Insightful! You're absolutely correct, if Samsung doesn't push accessory manufacturers to support USB-C as the main connection for devices, the accessory market will fragment, with some supporting the old 3.5" connection, some supporting the older USB connectors, and some supporting the new USB-C.

    24. Re: No choice by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Here's a notion to ponder: the headphone jack doesn't know how old its design is. Neither do the headphones. Why does the age of the original tech matter when there is absolutely nothing wrong with it?

      Absolutely nothing. I wasn't suggesting that the tech is bad because it is old... only pointing out that it's considerably older than just 40 years, and that contary to the above poster's apparent opinion, the tech did *NOT* start with Sony's Walkman... Heck, it wasn't even the walkman that first made the 3.5 mm jack popular (although I think that it *was* still Sony's transistor radios).

      digital headphones do not sound better and have all kinds of problems like taking up the port you use for charging and also of course requiring a stupid dongle to work with anything else

      USB-C headphones today could easily match the fidelity of even the finest 3.5mm jack headphones, and are possibly even capable of even better quality sound, at least on paper. Whether that actually comes to pass remains to be seen. While replacing old tech for replacement's sake isn't necessarily a good thing, replacing old tech with something that can do it one better, even if only in theory, is not... because traditionally that theory can, and eventually does become practice. It wasn't that long that computers gave up the centronics parallel port, even though it was being replaced with a port that was fundamentally serial in design: usb... a tech that at the time was only 1.5Mb/s for reliable communication compared to the parallel port's already extremely reliable 2.5 Mb/s. USB did also support a high speed mode of 12Mb/s, but initially most manufactures did not use that speed because of reliability concerns.

      If they eliminated the ability to charge and listen with headphones at the same time, however... I'm totally on the same page as you on that matter. Clearly, they need to have the charging and data port separate from the headphone port so that you *CAN* listen to it while charging the device. There are accessibility concerns in this regard that Apple has completely ignored, and other manufacturers need to call them out on that instead of simply mimicking what they have done.

      And USB-C is itself a standard and ubiquitous form factor, so there are no proprietary licensing fees associated with using it. USB headphones are inexpensive and readily available (and are likely to become increasingly so as manufacturers migrate to using that form factor), so the core difficulties that come with using Lightning do not apply.

      In the interim, you can use a dongle to connect standard 3.5mm headphones to your computer.... but that's not fundamentally any different than using a dongle to connect a ps/2 mouse to a usb -only latop computer.

    25. Re:No choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DAC has to go somewhere. Should it go in the device or in every single pair of headphones made?

    26. Re:No choice by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Moving the audio port from a headphone jack to USB or Lightning connector doesn't improve the sound. All it does is move the DAC (digital to analog converter) from the phone to an external dongle (headphone jack adapter), or to your headphones (wireless). The digital signal still needs to be converted to analog at some point before you can hear it.

    27. Re:No choice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Samsung creating a market for those devices

      Indeed we could create a headphone for the few Samsung phones, and then a different headphones for the iPhone users, or we could just put a 3.5mm jack on it and be compatible with billions of existing devices around the world.

      At best you may see adaptors or the occasional marketing stunt, but don't think this is going to be a change for the market.

    28. Re:No choice by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

      You've made some errors in your assessment. No one is going to use micro-USB, it will be USB-C. I'm not sure if power both ways is part of this standard but it doesn't matter because the signal coming out is the same analog levels as a TRS plug, just on the pins of the USB-C instead.

      --
      horror vacui
    29. Re:No choice by GonzoPhysicist · · Score: 1

      It's the same analog signal coming out the usb plug, no need for another DAC which the phone would still have to have anyway for it's speaker

      --
      horror vacui
  13. Idiots by campuscodi · · Score: 1

    These vendors are idiots. Utter idiots. I'd rather buy a spyware infected smartphone rather than Bluetooth headphones. I have enough radiation around my head anyway.

    1. Re:Idiots by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      You worry about the radiation from Bluetooth? And you call the vendors idiots?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically people don't use their phone for hours on end. They might listen to music for hours though. What's the impact of power vs exposure time? I'm not sure we know yet.

  14. 2 things I look for when I buy a phone by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    SDC slot. Normal use, I've got different music on different cards. Every few months I'll decide I'm tired of Megadeth and want some Mozart. Vacation, fill up the card with pictures/videos, put another in. Back at the hotel both get emptied to the laptop and cleared.

    Headphone jack. I can use that jack to plug my phone into my stereo. I can use that jack for a 20 year old pair of headphones that still sound pretty damned good. Or I can use that jack for earbuds when I'm trying to exercise my skinny ghost white legs outside of mom's basement.

    Other than that, price is most important. Everything else falls into the "half inch screen vs 2 hrs battery" confluddle.

    Seriously, the point to an SDC card is the company will advertise 32G storage. They won't advertise it's 3 gig OS, and 16 gig shovelware you can't delete unless you root your phone.

    As to the music, when I'm thinking/designing a project I like mellow music, or prog like Genesis and Amplifier. When I'm coding, Megadeth and company are the way to go. Debugging depends on how well the schedule is going. It's not a conscious decision, it's what I feel like listening to at the time.

  15. enjoy your exploding shitphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'll be buying a real phone. fuck you samsung and apple.

  16. Cut to the chase: phone without speakers or mic by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, what kind of rube would put a phone up to their ear to talk on? Amiright? Wireless headset'll cover the niche case of using your phone to make phone calls.

    1. Re:Cut to the chase: phone without speakers or mic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can make them even smaller and seriously extend battery life if you do away with the display!

  17. Toldja So by macs4all · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A few weeks ago, when all the Apple Haters were excoriating Apple for removing the 3.5 mm Jack in the iPhone 7, I predicted right here that this would happen within a year after the iPhone 7 came out.

    Guess Samsung is still all about copying Apple ( yet again) after all...

    Now watch as all the Fandroids rush to post that the iPhone wasn't first to eliminate the 3.5 mm Jack, which I also pointed out while those same people tripped over each other to say that the iPhone was completely ignoring their users, engaging in vendor lock-in and money grabbing (when Apple supplied a free adapter with the phone!) etc...

    1. Re:Toldja So by Gussington · · Score: 2

      A few weeks ago, when all the Apple Haters were excoriating Apple for removing the 3.5 mm Jack in the iPhone 7, I predicted right here that this would happen within a year after the iPhone 7 came out.

      You predicted that someone on the internet would speculate that maybe Samsung might do something similar possibly but is only guessing?
      Awesome skills bro...

    2. Re:Toldja So by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Agreed.. Like sensational stories on Slashdot are hard to predict.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    3. Re:Toldja So by narcc · · Score: 1

      There is exactly zero evidence that Samsung is even considering removing the 3.5mm jack. None. It's 100% pure, unadulterated, speculation from one of BGR's worst "reporters".

      You might want to wait to brag about the accuracy of your prognostications until, you know, they actually come true.

    4. Re:Toldja So by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as a 'Fandroid'

      There are Applephone zealots.

      And there are The Rest Of Us.

      It's that simple.

      Now, if you belong to a Scientologist-like cult, it might not seem so.

    5. Re:Toldja So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too desperate man! We get that you like Apple but, you know, most of us don't care. I know that by not loving Apple I'm automatically a 'Fandroid'. I get that you think only Apple innovate and everyone else follows, that you are chums with The Woz and no doubt shared a sprout and tofu salad with Jobbsy. But honestly, you're just coming across as needy and desperate.

      To most of us you just come across like a fundamentalist protestant trying to tell a room full of atheists why its better than catholicism.

    6. Re:Toldja So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still haven't figured out the adapter, have you? First, you have to understand how Apple operates, which apparently you don't. Unlike other companies that try to achieve a balance between making a profit and satisfying customers, Apple is obsessed with raping the wallets of their devoted followers by any and all means possible. But, like any cult group, they know there's a limit to how much abuse their sheep will tolerate. The adapter is inconvenient, apt to get lost, and guaranteed to break, but temporarily pacifies their user base while the Apple propaganda (we did this for your benefit) has time to take root. You can be sure that replacement adapters won't come cheap so that's profit for Apple. The inconvenience of the adapter will lead some people to purchase lighting headphones or Apple comparable wireless earbuds. Again, that's more profit for Apple. In the dictionary listing for "Evil Genius", you can be sure Apple will get a mention.

    7. Re:Toldja So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now watch as all the Fandroids rush to post that the iPhone wasn't first to eliminate the 3.5 mm Jack..

      My first "smart" phone was an HTC Touch running Windows Mobile 6.1 without a headphone jack.. nope, those dicks required me to use some bastardized USB headphone system to listen to music. It was truly the worst.

    8. Re:Toldja So by macs4all · · Score: 1

      You can be sure that replacement adapters won't come cheap so that's profit for Apple.

      Apple is selling replacement adapters for $9. STFU.

  18. slavish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slavish

  19. Samsung only 22% of smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're out of touch. Chinese phone makers are the majority now, Samsung is the biggest of the Android bunch at 22%, but it cannot dictate the market. Likewise Apple at 11% cannot either.

    If consumers WANTED this feature, they've had Bluetooth for years and still want the 3.5mm jack, so it needs to stay.

    I've had a few BT headphones over the years, my current headphone is a Bose Quiet Comfort 25, WIRED headphone. I really don't want to go back to Bluetooth, I didn't find it had any advantages and it was just another thing to keep charged, and that needed to be sync'd whenever the devices changed. Nuisance for no benefit.

    1. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by Snotnose · · Score: 1

      Bought a car stereo a little over 2 years ago, the stereo system could either connect to bluetooth, or use a USB device. Connected my phone to bluetooth, it didn't sound right. Couldn't put my finger on it, but it sounded thin. Put the same music on a USB device, it sounds just fine.

      Dunno what it is, but from where I stand bluetooth audio (or maybe Alpine stereo) needs some learnen.

    2. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by drgould · · Score: 1

      Bought a car stereo a little over 2 years ago, the stereo system could either connect to bluetooth, or use a USB device. Connected my phone to bluetooth, it didn't sound right. Couldn't put my finger on it, but it sounded thin. Put the same music on a USB device, it sounds just fine.

      I've read, but cannot confirm, that the problem is that compressed music on your cell phone is decompressed and then recompressed and decompressed again over Bluetooth.

      The problem is that the compression algorithms are designed to emphasize and de-emphasize different music characteristics. So it's kind-of like squeezing your music through two incompatible audio filters, it just squeezes all the goodness from your music.

      In fact, I don't know but I'm willing to bet the Bluetooth compression is optimized for speech, which would be crap for music.

    3. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious question, are Samsungs made in China?

    4. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Last time I rented a car, it had one of those that could do bluetooth or analogue. I spent a while battling with it to make it work over bluetooth, because I (probably like many people here) refused to admit defeat over something like that.

      Then after an hour battling rather peculiar behaviour with the play/pause/skip buttons, I gave up and plugged in the analogue cable instead.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re: Samsung only 22% of smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you have to charge the QC25 anyway?

    6. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      it's the codec being used over Bluetooth. If it's using the standard crap that's been available for like 10 years, it's bitcrushed over-compressed crap. Newer stuff uses different codecs that are far more efficient, but even the marketingspeak only claims "near CD-quality".

      Bluetooth audio is shit if you are looking for fidelity. If you're just looking for a waveform to come out of speakers, it's adequate.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:Samsung only 22% of smartphones by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      It's likely that the codec is old as fuck. It is meant for music somewhat, but it is old crap (made with the constraints of the medium and low power battery powered CPUs of the late 90s) and you would need your receiver hardware to have a newer Bluetooth version, plus a patented codec.

      MP3 will become unpatented in April 2017 (!) for an exemple. Let's wait for AptX codec to become patent free, then for a car audio system with AptX be designed, for the car to be manufactured three or five years later with that old audio system, and for the car to be one year old when you rent it. Then you'll have good Bluetooth sound when you rent a car in 2033, if Bluetooth still is a thing.

  20. Upgrades... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung decides to add 1/4" headphone jack instead, courts audiophiles...

  21. Fuck Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I won't buy it. I have no intention of carrying around an extra dongle just so I can listen to normal headphones, and then an additional dongle should I want to charge and listen at the same time. Samsung may be the market leader in Android smart phones but they are far from the only option. If this is true, then the S6 will be my last Samsung phone. Vote with your wallet people, its the only thing they will listen to.

  22. Another Galaxy Failure? by HannethCom · · Score: 1

    I would think they would be reluctant to do something stupid like getting rid of the headphone jack.
    Especially after the Galaxy S6 colossal failure with not having the microSD slot and no removable battery.
    Then with the S7 Note still having the locked in battery so they have to change it, and is looking like they have to do a second recall.
    This path with the S8 looks like intentional suicide.

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:Another Galaxy Failure? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Maybe Samsung really DOES want to just slavishly copy what Apple does.

      Maybe both companies will 'innovate' their way down the sewer drain.

      I'm a Dreamer. But I'm not the only one.

      (and I like the cheap midrange Samsung phone I am using presently)

  23. LinuxCON Oct 4 - Oct 6 2016 by khz6955 · · Score: 0

    'There's simply no other event in Europe where developers, sys admins, architects and all levels of technical talent gather together under one roof for education, collaboration and problem-solving to further the Linux platform.' link

    1. Re:LinuxCON Oct 4 - Oct 6 2016 by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Submit a story, then, and don't spam unrelated ones.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:LinuxCON Oct 4 - Oct 6 2016 by khz6955 · · Score: 1

      But yet this s*** gets a whole article Ubuntu 16.04 Available in Latest Insider Update To Windows 10

  24. Whelp... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    That's one less thing to explode then I guess. :P

    Stale jokes aside, that's one less brand for me to choose from then.

  25. Mindless Droves of Chargers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know which will come sooner, the ability for humans to live without sleeping, or "smart" phones which no longer need to charge all the fucking time.

  26. How courageous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How courageous!

  27. 2 usb-c ports by djgalning · · Score: 1

    If samsung does this, i hope they are concidering dual ports, one on the top and one on the bottom. Charging should always happen on the bottom, wires over the top can be annoying exp while talking on the phone. headset/headphones should always be on the top, it just makes things easier. If samsung chooses to go the route with top and bottom usb-c's i dont see any problem in it (converters can be made etc)

  28. How utterly predictable from Samsung. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I used to defend these guys for 'copying' the iPhone back in the day (to an extent) since that's just how smart phones 'work best'

    That being said, these dozy bastards continue to basically copy Apple every god damned turn. They neuter phones (removing SD cards) they neuter phones (non removable battery) they make obstinate Apple like decisions (cuved only display on the Note 7, UGH) I think one of the only good things they do is wireless charging and the continued support of a _physical_ fucking home button (remove that and we are DONE Samsung)

    I like my headphone port, you wanna be smart? Make it 2.5mm like Blackberry tried, let's take another shot at it, see if Nokia, HTC, LG follow suit - let's switch all 3.5mm jacks to 2.5mm over the next decade? But this no headphone thing is bunk.

    1. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I hear over and over again that capitalism is supposed to give the consumer what they want because the consumer is king. It seems to me the consumer gets treated more like livestock than royalty.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by Andreas+Mayer · · Score: 1

      I like my headphone port, you wanna be smart? Make it 2.5mm like Blackberry tried, let's take another shot at it, see if Nokia, HTC, LG follow suit - let's switch all 3.5mm jacks to 2.5mm over the next decade? But this no headphone thing is bunk.

      How is an incompatible analog port better than an incompatible digital port?

      At least the digital port can be used for other things. And to use your old headphones you'd need an adapter either way.

      The analog adapter would be cheaper. But that's all I can come up with.

    3. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      No need for a DAC in every set of headphones.
      They get their space savings they want.
      Adapter is cheap and already exists.
      Potentially a universal standard.

    4. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by Silicon-Surfer · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I hear over and over again that capitalism is supposed to give the consumer what they want because the consumer is king.

      Not any more, the big corporations "fixed" that...

    5. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, that was the free market.

      The big difference between capitalism and the free market is that the free market requires the state keeping it free by breaking up monopolies (e.g. Microsoft) and oligopolies (e.g. Samsung and Apple). Capitalism, on the other hand, loves monopolies and oligopolies.

    6. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Changing the connector is still changing the connector. Now, instead of saving a bit of space inside the phone (spurious justification at best), you are saving no space and still using a dongle of some variety so you can plug in your 3.5mm cable.

      Leave the god damn thing alone, or do something that is actually better. For the record, neither what Apple has done, nor Samsung possibly, is better.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    7. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      Consumers are king, but you can't please everyone. Check out the BuzzFeed article where they interviewed the VP of engineering and another VP at Apple about the decision.

      According to them: "among the features people most care about in a high-end smartphone ... is the camera."

      Removal of the headphone jack apparently let them add some extra image stabilization and camera features along with a 14% larger battery. They apparently believe that they ARE catering to the consumers. Revenue from dongles and special Apple headphones will probably offset losses from people who won't buy the phone because of the missing headphone jack.

      The market will decide.

    8. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      So you're saying it's all just a huge coincidence that these moves they make to please the customer just require us to buy more stuff that is more expensive and only lasts a few years?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    9. Re:How utterly predictable from Samsung. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      >According to them: "among the features people most care about in a high-end smartphone ... is the camera."

      My next phone, that's pretty much what it's going to come down to. I rarely use my headphone jack, don't really care about SD cards and removable batteries and don't really care too much about screen resolution. But I do use the camera quite a lot.

  29. nght by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    I just want to use a standard headphone and charge at the same time, that's all I ask. I use my phone for music all night and I want my alarm to work in the morning.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    1. Re:nght by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      ..without having a stupid extra dongle to buy and lose.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    2. Re:nght by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      ..without having a stupid extra dongle to buy and lose.

      Glue dongle into port. Problem solved.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:nght by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I'd rather glue a USB to 3.5mm dongle to the end of usb headphones. Wow, now my headphones are compatible with 99% of all devices!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  30. My Next Flagship Smartphone by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

    May Not Feature a Samsung Logo.

  31. Attention Samsung and Apple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, fuckers. Why don't you guys just mill a block of solid aluminum into a skinny rounded rectangle, stamp your company's name on that, call it a smartphone, then shove it up your asses? SIDEWAYS!

    I'd rather buy a Bell fucking rotary telephone than one of your goddamned useless Bluetooth-only pieces of shit.

    Fuck you.

  32. Damn it Samsung, be your own company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung, you had something good. Unfortunately, your love affair of apple is clouding your judgment. Just think about how much money you could have made/saved by having an external battery on the note 7. People want choices. We want a head phone jack. We want an infrared port. We want SD card slots, we want extended batteries, we want multiple sim slots. Damn it. Be better than the proprietary apple. Your openness is an advantage. Its friggin hard to hold slim phones, and NO one but media writers care how thin the damn phone is. Make the phone rootable, hell, make it so easy that non techies can do it. Give freedom and control with your hardware. You will win. Apple can not compete with that. Be a leader.

  33. Then my next phone won't be a Samsung by ElectricPrism · · Score: 1

    Then my next phone won't be a Samsung. Sure my Sol Republic Track Air's are Bluetooth but I would never wear them while exercising. So now that Apple and Samsung are out of the game, who is next in Line to accept my cash in about a year.

  34. Just Don't Buy It by BrendaEM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's all you have to do, and these stupid lame assholes will get fired, and their replacements will know enough not to take away useful features.

    If you buy one, you are part of the problem.
    If you don't buy one, you are part of the solution.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
    1. Re:Just Don't Buy It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to say this. If you want a new iOS device and you want it to have a headphone jack, you're out of luck. But if you want a new Android device with a 3.5mm there's plenty of choice. I see no reason to be an Apple or Samsung fanboy if you feel that company is screwing you over by taking away your choices.

    2. Re:Just Don't Buy It by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      That's all you have to do, and these stupid lame assholes will get fired, and their replacements will know enough not to take away useful features.

      If you buy one, you are part of the problem.
      If you don't buy one, you are part of the solution.

      Yes your one missed theoretical sale will definitely be noticed and acted on. We've seen this before, manufacturers follow each other around like sheep - there's not nearly the amount of variety in the Android lineup that you would expect given the freedom of the platform. (where's my phone with a keyboard? where's my phone with a decent battery? Where's my compact phone with a small screen?)

      Absolutely don't buy one. But make a noise too, otherwise you can easily expect other good phones to be hobbled by this "feature", and you won't get a choice in the matter. The market does not fix all ills by itself.

    3. Re:Just Don't Buy It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this doesn't work. Let me illustrate:

      Samsung: No more headphone jack. /. Geek: Bye.
      10,000,000 other consumers: Shut up and take our money!
      Samsung: Ah good, this is what they wanted. Let's look at removing the battery next....

      No, I don't have a solution. But saying "I refuse to buy!" doesn't change anything because you can't control what millions of other consumers will buy.

    4. Re:Just Don't Buy It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have missed the backlash from the removal of the SD card slot on their previous phone. Seems to me like consumers followed OP's advice... it wasn't "one missed theoretical sale", it was a large enough number to be noticed and cause them to reverse course.

    5. Re:Just Don't Buy It by nazrhyn · · Score: 1

      Don't be pedantic. "You", in this case, is clearly plural.

    6. Re:Just Don't Buy It by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      Don't be pedantic. "You", in this case, is clearly plural.

      And such instructions are pointless because no person can act for the plurality.

      Yes you shouldn't buy such a product, but the original post suggests this is all you need to do. Speaking out, making sure the company is aware of *why* people are unhappy is also part of the solution. If you don't do that they will imagine all sorts of other reasons why they aren't selling.

  35. How Can People Be So Stupid? by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    People will but any turd marketing people put before them.

    Why not just sell people a sheet of aluminum?
    It's so thin. What a clean design....

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  36. IT'S A DATA PORT by globaljustin · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not *just* a "headphone jack"

    Here's what we're removing: a universally compatible **data port** that is also a backwards compatible audio only port that will connect to devices over 100 years old in some cases.

    It works really well and allows device manufacturers like Square to make one smartphone add-on that works with all smartphones.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:IT'S A DATA PORT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought those things just ran the audio at a frequency they could capture for power, then pass data over bluetooth. Not really the same here

    2. Re:IT'S A DATA PORT by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Somehow you can live completely cashless in many parts of Europe without the help of Square. Personally I'm not going to be inserting my card and typing my pin into someone's phone.

      But then I also wear a condom while having sex with strangers so I'm a bit boring like that.

    3. Re:IT'S A DATA PORT by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      Glad you agree about how foolish Apple's decision was, thanks.

      In regards to Square, it's one example of a greater point about usability of a data port/audio port and how foolish it was to remove it.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
  37. it is a data port that also does audio by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    40 year old analog technology

    wrong!

    it is a *data port* that is *also* a ridiculously backwards compatible audio port

    look at Square credit card readers and dozens of other examples...one port, one devices, which works on all smartphones (and tablets!)

    Apple did this because that's how they pump up their profits...they remove data ports, say "innovation!" and reap millions on dongles...it's awful but it's not completely unprecidented (Microsoft is worse but that's no comfort)...

    Samsung is worse than Apple...they *copied* an anti-user design choice purely because another company did it

    Apple designers are stupid for thinking this is a good idea, and Samsung is stupider for copying it mindlessly.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:it is a data port that also does audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple did this because that's how they pump up their profits...they remove data ports, say "innovation!" and reap millions on dongle

      Could you explain in more detail to me how to make millions of dollars off of a dongle included with each phone for free?

      I desperately need to know for a business idea I have.

  38. What is it with bad ideas spreading like a plague? by BlytheBowman · · Score: 1

    Usb-C headphones... kind of like the bad old days where I had to buy a special USB earphone (which broke pretty quick) to listen to MP3s on my Motorola RAZR flip phone (nice phone back in the previous decade though my Sprint version was plagued with shitty carrier-taylored software)

  39. as a customer by dimko · · Score: 1

    I am happy with phone size(phoblet, LG G3) What I want - better battery life. I don't actually mind if phone gets slightly thicker for battery life. I DON'T want phone that doesn't have 3.5 jack. In this economy I don't have MONEY for new 170$ headphones. I am happy with my relatively not shitty quality wired headphones from Senheiser. Got warranty for 3 years from them.(yep, paid for extra warranty, but in period of a year already changed it once) Thank you Samsung, but no, thank you.

  40. Change for nothing by lapm · · Score: 1

    USB-C is still proprietary port. Just because some specs are available docent mean its open implementation. This is change for no reason. Users have been wanting better batteries for phones for years now. Trend seems to be thinner and thinner phones that also means severe compromises on physical integrity of phone. Personally i would keep old and trusty connector, add couple mm to thickness of phone and use that space to add bigger battery for phone. Modern usage patterns really dont benefit to small batteries...

  41. Stop Trying to be Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really wish Samsung would stop trying to be apple.
    It seems that the last few steps they have taken in this direction have ended badly.
    Would they have had this problem with batteries if the battery had been removable?? Well maybe, but it would have been so much cheaper for them to fix if the battery was removable.

    I made the switch from Samsung to LG last year because Samsung are just too much like apple.
    Although in my case this may have been a mistake as my LG G4 has been for repair 6 times. I think I was just unlucky. My Wife has had no problems with her LG G4.

    Wireless audio for me just doesn't work. It's ok in the car but in free air, my body just get's in the way and I get dropout.
    The only way I can make it work is to use an armband phone holder, but I really don't want to have my phone on display for all to see and steal.

    Samsung, if you want my custom put back the removable battery and the microSD port and keep having a headphone port.

  42. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by lesincompetent · · Score: 2

    Corporations needed another way to overcharge customers and push DRM to please media moguls, ostensibly.
    Headphones are the easiest target.

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and push DRM to please media moguls

      Oh stop it with the DRM already. It has nothing to do with it because it can have nothing to do with it. You can't close this analogue hole.

    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my HDMI hole.

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my HDMI hole.

      HDMI still has an analogue hole. The problem is you need to level shift and record 2.0736 million signals. Whereas with audio you only need to record 2, and you don't even need to level shift them.

      Closing the analogue hole in audio is delusional at best. But if you find someone who actually believes that's the reason for it let me know, I have a whole lot of perpetual motion machines to sell them.

    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupidCauseTheSubjectIsTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, an excellent way to close the analog hole whilst milking the cash cow for yet more unneeded accessories to decode the audio data back to their analog counterparts.

      At least this pushes the DAC outside of the device; thus creating an opportunity for Monster to market something here to the rich and gullible.

  43. How is the headphone jack a barrier to slimness? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    That's 3.5mm plus at most 0.5mm each side for the case. The Vivo X5 max is 4.75mm and that manages to squeeze a headphone jack in (I'll admit this is pretty impressive). Samsungs aren't even close yet. The A8 is 5.9mm. Fair way to go yet.

  44. apple and the jackass RIAA at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stick it up your analogue holes you assholes.

  45. No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No worries. I'll just add 3.5mm audio jack to the things to look for the next time I'm buying. Right under SD-card slot.

  46. Give me TWO usb ports by Parafilmus · · Score: 1

    I'm fine with digital audio output. But I need the ability to charge and listen simultaneously, and don't want to carry a hub around.

    Give me two USB ports, and you've got yourself a sale.

  47. Yeah, Samsung are a bit Me-Too by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Where Apple leads they follow, its a bit tragic really. You'd think a company as large as Samsung could come up with original ideas that DONT affect functionality. Yes they had edge, but thats just a gimmick rather than something genuinely useful.

    Lets see how much the next Samsung Wireless Headphones cost. Which incidentaly will probably be incompatible with every other phone.

  48. I'll just be happy by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I'll just be happy if it doesn't catch alight

  49. Never used it anyway. by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    I've had an iPhone 3Gs, an iPhone 4, and currently a Samsung Galaxy S4 Active. I have never used the headphone port on any of them. Good riddance!

  50. The market will decide. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Long live LG !!

    ( Better phones anyways )

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  51. Dont't like Samsung anyway. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Samsung had replacable batteries until recently. That ditches their one single selling point in my book.

    Other than that, their case design is bad and looks cheap on top of that and their UI is bad.

    Motorola, HTC, OnePlus and Huawei beat Samsung anytime in my book.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  52. No vendor lockin by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Apple can get away with this shit because they have the courage to kick users repeatedly in the nuts knowing full well they are protected by vendor lock-in with investments in the Apple ecosystem and the complete lack of any alternatives.

    Samsung isn't the only Android vendor. The only thing they have of interest is their hardware. If the hardware doesn't suit the users the users will move. This is exactly what happened with Galaxy S6, the model which many skipped due to lack of an SD card, also something which they have aggressively backpedaled on with all their current offerings having an SD card again.

  53. TFA us a true thing. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    The battery will have blown the headphone jack a million miles away.
    See? No headphone jack.
    Told you so.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  54. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsungs next phone will also come laden with even more crapware that is impossible to remove, and explode with 21% greater frequency. They must be actively looking for new ways to make their phones less attractive now.

  55. i want candybars to make a comeback. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nokia 5800xm is the perfect pocket size touchscreen phone. small, but a little thicker.

    and physical buttons so you can hold it without pressing back or home.

    really i just want a phone that size, with android and octacore and fullhd.

  56. Note to Samsung. DON'T remove the 3.5mm jack. by Angeret · · Score: 1

    Unless you're planning to release cheap Bluetooth earbuds (that don't make you look like an idiot) with a battery life that lasts for all day use - just ... don't. Wired headphones might get tangled up sometimes but they're convenient and don't require regular recharging, or replacing when the non-replaceable battery fails.

    As to making them slimmer and more water resistant? Bullshit! With the snail-slow advance of battery technology, if phones get much slimmer they'll barely have room for a battery that lasts more than a few hours and they'll just be far easier to damage. Sockets can be used that prevent water ingress. Hell, they won't even need pressure gaskets for them - just use some of that glue that seems to appear in all the most unwanted places.

    Here's an idea... produce a micro hub that allows a person to use USB headphones and something else simultaneously (charger, storage, whatever) and leave that as an option for a few years. If enough people have stopped using the headphone socket to make the change worthwhile, *then* consider removing the socket.

    Another... stop making the phones thinner until you have batteries that won't go bang and a normal usage life of at least a whole day before needing a recharge. I say this as a Note 7 owner who thinks his phone is quite thin enough already and if it was any thinner would be impossible to hold *and* use due to the screen edges being constantly held in at least 3 places.

    And while I'm on a roll here - you could easily have a removable battery in a phone with a high IP rating - a pressure gasket and a rigid slot cover with captive screws or a pin release would take care of that (like the SIM/SD slot only larger).

  57. No Choice in Modern Smartphones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern smartphones are just an homogenisation these days. There isn't really any variety, everyone's phones look the same.
    Single screen, touch only interface.

    Bring back different models, sliders, clamshell, physical keyboards.
    Seriously all the rival manufacturers may as well just form one conglomerate and split the profits.

  58. Let's hear their explanation. by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    I'm from the "I'm not buying one of these phones without the headphone jack" camp, but after reading an interview with some Apple engineers, I understood why they made their decision. Interesting read. They had determined that the overwhelming use of the i-Phone involved people taking selfies and other photos. Removing the headphone jack freed up space for some image stabilization hardware and other camera-related functions and allowed for a slight increase in battery size. Sounds like they know their customers and apparently, people like me, who use that headphone jack almost every day, are in the minority.
    Hopefully Samsung has good design reasons and isn't just following Apple.

  59. Anyone Read TFA? by tsqr · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    "That said, this is still speculation based on what’s currently happening in the mobile world, and Samsung has yet to say anything about its next-gen mobile devices."

  60. Lol more bad journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nowhere had Samsung said they're even considering removing the jack.

    All of their phones since the S5 have had water resistance and a headphone jack.

    It's trivially easy for Samsung to make, and only i fanbois keep making these posts.

  61. Standards come and go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VGA ports? Let's keep those around FOREVER.
    8-pin serial ports? Great idea.
    Qwerty keyboards are just the bestest.
    Giant USB? PS/2? PCICMA slots? PCI slots?
    These are all Du Jour standards, accepted because it was cost-effective to do so. If it becomes cost effective to get rid of the audio port then so be it.
    Stands come AND standards go.

    Get over it.

    1. Re: Standards come and go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were 9-pin, you fucking hipster millennial. And "PCICMA"? Seriously? Pronounce that, I dare you. "pah-kick-mah". Make sure there are others near you when you do it, though, so that they CAN.

      Then do us all a favour and fuck off.

  62. Not as bad as Apple by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    I am all for the 3.5mm jack, and think they should keep it on their phone.
    However at least USB-C is a standard. USB-C audio could replace the headphone jack on all manufacturers, so it's really not as bad as having only a non-standard (lightning) port.

  63. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good to see Samsung coming to their senses, the future is wireless The technology to send audio and power earpods wirelessly exists, but the transition will not happem untilwe get rid of this old standard.

  64. This will help you... by pastafazou · · Score: 1
  65. You want to fuck Apple over at their own game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put that headphone jack back on the top of the device where it belongs. That way you have the perfectly clean bottom with just a USB port, and a FUCKING HEADPHONE JACK AS GOD INTENDED!

  66. Wireless charging means no jack needed to charge. by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Samsung phones have wireless charging. You don't need a jack to charge them.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  67. ROFLMAO by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    Whoa? Did it just get a whole lot quieter all of a sudden? Suddenly a whole lot of vociferous Apple-haters suddenly have feet in their mouths.

    Not that I actually care, or anything. My purchasing decisions are based on the best compromise between what I need, what I want, and what's actually available.

    But I can't help feel a bit of schadenfreude when reality dumps a bucket of ice water over zealots who raise the whole Apple vs Android thing to religious levels.

  68. collusion like airlines? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I remember when one airline got this idea of charging for check-in baggage, then immediately all airlines did the same.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  69. How courageous of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, to release a phone without a headphone jack, that is saying... Well nothing, really.

    1. Re:How courageous of them. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it - looks like courage is contagious

  70. Oh c'mon! Really?!?!? by kimgkimg · · Score: 1

    Seriously Samsung, be different by being the same for a change! First they took away the removable battery, and then they brought it back, and then they took away the microSD card slot, and then brought it back. It's just like Microsoft, every 2nd product release is the good one.

  71. Samsung by Nukenbar · · Score: 1

    It takes courage to remove and industry standard port just to replace it with a proprietary one.

  72. Did anyone actually read the article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article says nothing about Samsung removing the headphone jack from future phones, all it does it talk about the new standard of sending audio over USB-C. It actually says at the end that Samsung has never said anything about it removing headphone jacks. This just looks like click-bait reporting by making the title something that will get people worked up over nothing. All this says is that audio over USB-C is a thing, not exactly breaking news.

  73. I don't want rechargable headphones by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 2

    for the same reasons I don't use wireless mice or keyboards.

    If the battery is replaceable, then you have to keep batteries on hand for when they die. ( which is constantly and at the worst possible moment )

    If not replaceable, you get to keep buying new mice and keyboards every few years when the batteries ultimately give out.

    In your phone, the battery is likely going to be the first component that dies taking the whole device with it. Being non-user replaceable, this forces you to upgrade to the next phone. It's nothing more than planned obsolesence. Same thing for the wireless, battery powered headphones you'll be using soon.

    I have to replace my headphones soon not because the battery died, but because I've worn out the ear cushions.

    Considering I've used them for at least a DECADE, I'm pretty sure I've got my moneys worth from them.

    Then again, I may just try to replace the ear cushions myself and keep on using them until they truly die.

    New hotness is not always better.

  74. It sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Motorola has those mods and none of them have an audio jack or an extra usb. Pathetic.

  75. For the love of all that is holy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the love of all that is holy, Samsung, please don't do this. I'm already being forced to jump off the Apple ship. Support for audio over USB-C is great, but it's not yet and may never be an acceptable replacement for the headphone jack.

  76. Changed my view by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    With Bluetooth headsets so cheap now, I no longer see the headphone jack as really necessary. You can get a decent headset for as little as 20 bucks from a store like Big Lots.

  77. Whatever you do don't buy a Samsung phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only their software updates brick your phone, after you agree to pay for having it fixed because a fix you had done to the slightly cracked screen meant your phone's warranty was suddenly invalid; after spending *four* hours on calls they arrange to send UPS to pick the pone up to inspect and fix, only to then send it back to you unfixed, without a letter, email or call, no explanation whatsoever. Just like that. As I am typing this I am already 31 minutes on hold, trying to speak to their support. Samsung are shit, avoid them at all costs.

  78. aux port by Holi · · Score: 1

    In both my car and on my boat my radios have an aux port and neither have bluetooth. This would ensure that I won't buy a Samsung phone. I just wish LG's were a little better.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  79. Re:Wireless charging means no jack needed to charg by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Hurrah I just need to carry a dock around with me. Did you get that from Apples marketing department?

  80. Pure speculation, only news is audio over USB-C by Torodung · · Score: 1

    That said, this is still speculation based on what’s currently happening in the mobile world, and Samsung has yet to say anything about its next-gen mobile devices.

    This article is pure speculation. The only "news" is the audio over USB-C standard.

    How did this get out of the firehose? It looks more like a Usenet article than a news article.

  81. NO Worries. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped at S4 Active, i want removeable batteries.

  82. Stop making phones slim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want a slimmer phone.
    I put a case on my phone to make it more bulky, it literally doubles the width of my phone and serves no other purpose.
    Screw being thin, give me a battery that lasts longer than 24 hours.

  83. Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No surprise here. This merely demonstrates what most of us know—that Samsung copies even Apple's stupid moves.

    Mobile device makers are being foolish going to one-port devices. If they've got gripes about the current headphone point, they need to create a open-to-all replacement that removes any problems it has. No one with any sense wants a mobile device that can't be charged at the same time it's used for music, podcasts or a private phone coversation. That's like owning a car that has to be parked to listen to the radio.

    And need I go into the problems of BT headset?. They've been around for roughly an decade and their market penetration can't be more that 20%. Users dislike them for a host of reasons.

  84. Bluetooth Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not buying an iPhone 7 nor the next Samsung flagship but if I did it wouldn't matter. Just another of the many reasons to love my wireless Bluetooth Beats.

  85. As long as it has a 39 inch whip antenna by vandamme · · Score: 1

    .... for the built-in FM radio, I won't need wired headphones.

    Oh wait, they need batteries? Forget it.

  86. Innovating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they'll put a flamethrower instead of the headphone jack.

  87. Fumes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will the smoke get out?