VW at 220m, ING at 150m, Diamler at 148m, Fiat, BASF, BMW, Nestle, Deutsche Bank, Vodaphone, Bosch, Barclays, Renault, Nokia, Bayer, Volvo, Philips, Ericsson, Christian Dior, Michelin, Accenture are all pretty big too.
Too busy to read all the replies to see if someone called out your FUD. Microsoft won't update your system to windows 10 on it's own.
Your reading of {some internet nerd}'s advice is incorrect. Unless you are on a metered connection, and a few extra GB of download is going to cause you so much grief that it's worth spending time on it, then you have nothing at all to do, and you won't have Windows 10 installed.
But if the original source machine has already picked which IPv6 source address to use then the firewall has to use the correct ISP
No it doesn't. The firewall should just throw away the source network prefix, and replace it with whatever the network prefix was assigned by the ISP it wants to use.
In this case, you are just going to use the network prefix like it was a private network prefix internally, and will get NATed as soon as it leaves the internal network. Hence the "N" in NAT. If your cheap NAT can't tell the difference between a packet coming in with your private network address and one already on your network, you should throw away that NAT and get a real one as there are probably a ton of (other) security issues in that POS.
It is also interesting to dive into those stats and you will notice a significant uptick of availability on weekends for north america. ISPs aren't the biggest offenders, nor is your home router, it is your company's routers and network that are the worst of the bunch here.
Not a time traveler from 1998, more like 2006-2007. Fire up Company of Heroes 1 on steam, and go and host a game. Yeah, NAT issues everywhere. People can't join. People will randomly drop. NAT still sucks for a lot of games, even AAA titles.
You've made numerous mistakes, using numerous fallacies:
1) You are being silly. Note that I put "OWNS" in quotes, because while the word does in fact meet some definitions of the word, I was using it as a shorthand without a very long description with the assumption that the average person should understand it's meaning (poisoning the well fallacy). We are talking about the legality of the situation, not the ethics, so I'll skip that (red herring fallacy, strawman fallacy). And the rest of your argument here is irrelevant (burden of proof fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, guilt by association fallacy).
2) The company's theory I am accepting is based on common law. The rest of your statements are irrelevant. You don't like it, oh well, that's not what the law says and sucks to be you.
3) Also typically irrelevant according to common employment law, except in the case that I originally mentioned that they had a prior existing relationship. The rest of your argument is irrelevant.
What I am describing is common employment law for people who are paid to do a job (Trade secrets). Client lists are considered trade secrets of the company, and it is quite common to have companies sue ex-employees for such behavior that you describe, and it is often spelled out in employment contracts as well (although this isn't necessary in most cases, it is done so ignorant employees don't claim they were unaware). Most of this isn't even up for debate, ask any lawyer who deals in such matters, even a bad one.
There are tens of thousands of them actually, from everything from the screws to the thermostats, to the wiring harnesses, brakes, tires, seats, radios, speakers, steering wheels. How many parts do you think GM/Ford actually MAKES vs just assembles?
Both the brokers and the employers claim the clients are THEIRS.
Pretty sure they both can claim it, but only the broker is correct. The employee has no right to claim it while employed to do such work -- unless the client was a client PRIOR to becoming an employee. If you are paid (hourly, salary, commission, or other) to find new clients, the company "owns" them, not the employee.
It may be SOP to do otherwise (or claim otherwise), but that doesn't mean it is legal either.
Sorry, the AC is correct. Many TCS systems will attempt to keep the tires from spinning, and without spinning, the tires don't rotate enough to keep the car moving forward, especially with rear wheel drive cars. I often have to disable the TCS system for my car for it to even be able to move forward in relatively deep snow. If going up a hill as he mentioned, the TCS system can and will make you lose enough momentum that you get stuck on the hill and the only way to move after that point is now in reverse (if you get stuck and don't start sliding backwards that is).
Probably. I hate that this keep happening. I just had to change all my passwords, and I'm having a hard time remembering it. I'm up to password10 now, and I keep forgetting it isn't password9 anymore.
So you've never bought a current generation phone, tablet, PC, or a linksys router? Each of those require a pin for different things. Phones and tablets to remove their SIM chips, PCs and linksys routers to reset their CMOS settings or any device with a CD/DVD/Bluray drive to open it in case it gets "stuck".
Does the US government have the right to sue an Irish company for information on Irish citizens held on servers located in Ireland?
Based on what I know of similar cases, the answer is yes. The typical response is nothing, but if one of the heads of MS-Ireland flies into the US, he can then be held in contempt.
More importantly, does the US Government have the right to sue a US company for that information?
Of course it does. Technically the US Government (or anyone) could so a US company (or anyone else) to give it the names and location of all extraterrestrial aliens it knows about, or all meetings they have had with Santa Claus. It's the judge who decides how to interpret the request, including throwing it out as being unlawful.
That said, there is precedent for such request, such as criminals hiding stolen monies in overseas banks being forced to produce the "keys" or accounts it is stored in. In this case, most people would/could see that is a reasonable request, as hiding money in a foreign bank shouldn't all of a sudden make it untouchable. In the US "data" is owned by the collector of such data in most cases, and from the point of view, if Microsoft owns the data, then according to US law, it could be compelled to produce foreign assets. Then there are all sorts of complicated issues involved like who owns the data, is it MS-US or MS-Ireland. Is MS-Ireland a wholly owned subsidiary of MS-US? Since MS-US is in the US, it could be compelled to request any (US) lawful thing of MS-Ireland. Can MS-Ireland then be legally obligated to produce the data even though illegal in Ireland? MS-US makes the request of MS-Ireland. MS-Ireland complies and produces such data. Ireland then slaps a $500k fine per person affected on MS-Ireland. MS-Ireland then forward the bill to MS-US, which then forwards the bill to the US Government which must then pay it as they are liable for any reasonable and foreseeable costs incurred in complying with such a request. Ireland then sends $100k to each affected individual ($400k per individual to cover their overhead).
There are a good number of government employees who make in salary much more than they would if they weren't in the government sector, but add to that, the benefits packages that many/most government employees get (health, dental, sick leave, vacation, holidays, 401k, pension, and early retirement) and then all of a sudden you have MOST government employees making way more than they would elsewhere.
Google it. We have 3D printed cars, 3D printed buildings, and of course tons of tiny stuff. Smaller stuff you'll be able to print yourself, more exotic or larger stuff you'll have to go to the local 3D print shop.
I forgot PLEX has the ability to have a central media server (or servers) and all clients can watch anything from any server, and sharing with friends and family (for those graduation and birthday movies of course).
What do you like more about kodi? I'm curious what they've added recently. Granted, I think the UI on the PC client is better than PLEX, however, PLEX has multiple user support (each with their own watched, queue lists), mobile support (with sync), and has a client for just about everything (some better than others). iOS client is good. Android client is ok. Xbox one client is likely the worst of the "official" clients. There is even an unofficial plug in for kodi.
Slashdot Mirror
VW at 220m, ING at 150m, Diamler at 148m, Fiat, BASF, BMW, Nestle, Deutsche Bank, Vodaphone, Bosch, Barclays, Renault, Nokia, Bayer, Volvo, Philips, Ericsson, Christian Dior, Michelin, Accenture are all pretty big too.
Click the ip6 adoption tab, then you can play with the timeline at the bottom to zoom in.
Too busy to read all the replies to see if someone called out your FUD. Microsoft won't update your system to windows 10 on it's own.
Your reading of {some internet nerd}'s advice is incorrect. Unless you are on a metered connection, and a few extra GB of download is going to cause you so much grief that it's worth spending time on it, then you have nothing at all to do, and you won't have Windows 10 installed.
Really, is reading comprehension so hard?
But if the original source machine has already picked which IPv6 source address to use then the firewall has to use the correct ISP
No it doesn't. The firewall should just throw away the source network prefix, and replace it with whatever the network prefix was assigned by the ISP it wants to use.
In this case, you are just going to use the network prefix like it was a private network prefix internally, and will get NATed as soon as it leaves the internal network. Hence the "N" in NAT. If your cheap NAT can't tell the difference between a packet coming in with your private network address and one already on your network, you should throw away that NAT and get a real one as there are probably a ton of (other) security issues in that POS.
It is also interesting to dive into those stats and you will notice a significant uptick of availability on weekends for north america. ISPs aren't the biggest offenders, nor is your home router, it is your company's routers and network that are the worst of the bunch here.
I recommend 128-bits so that we don't need to revisit this again in 2 years.
No, 10 would be a negative number if it's a signed 2-bit number, but he was incorrect, it isn't -1, it's -2.
IPV6.1 will have all the bugs worked out.
Not a time traveler from 1998, more like 2006-2007. Fire up Company of Heroes 1 on steam, and go and host a game. Yeah, NAT issues everywhere. People can't join. People will randomly drop. NAT still sucks for a lot of games, even AAA titles.
You've made numerous mistakes, using numerous fallacies:
1) You are being silly. Note that I put "OWNS" in quotes, because while the word does in fact meet some definitions of the word, I was using it as a shorthand without a very long description with the assumption that the average person should understand it's meaning (poisoning the well fallacy). We are talking about the legality of the situation, not the ethics, so I'll skip that (red herring fallacy, strawman fallacy). And the rest of your argument here is irrelevant (burden of proof fallacy, hasty generalization fallacy, guilt by association fallacy).
2) The company's theory I am accepting is based on common law. The rest of your statements are irrelevant. You don't like it, oh well, that's not what the law says and sucks to be you.
3) Also typically irrelevant according to common employment law, except in the case that I originally mentioned that they had a prior existing relationship. The rest of your argument is irrelevant.
What I am describing is common employment law for people who are paid to do a job (Trade secrets). Client lists are considered trade secrets of the company, and it is quite common to have companies sue ex-employees for such behavior that you describe, and it is often spelled out in employment contracts as well (although this isn't necessary in most cases, it is done so ignorant employees don't claim they were unaware). Most of this isn't even up for debate, ask any lawyer who deals in such matters, even a bad one.
There are no car foundries or car part vendors
There are tens of thousands of them actually, from everything from the screws to the thermostats, to the wiring harnesses, brakes, tires, seats, radios, speakers, steering wheels. How many parts do you think GM/Ford actually MAKES vs just assembles?
Both the brokers and the employers claim the clients are THEIRS.
Pretty sure they both can claim it, but only the broker is correct. The employee has no right to claim it while employed to do such work -- unless the client was a client PRIOR to becoming an employee. If you are paid (hourly, salary, commission, or other) to find new clients, the company "owns" them, not the employee.
It may be SOP to do otherwise (or claim otherwise), but that doesn't mean it is legal either.
LMGTFY:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I realize as an American you think the goal is for the cops to put everyone *else* in jail, but that in fact is not the case.
FTFY
Sorry, the AC is correct. Many TCS systems will attempt to keep the tires from spinning, and without spinning, the tires don't rotate enough to keep the car moving forward, especially with rear wheel drive cars. I often have to disable the TCS system for my car for it to even be able to move forward in relatively deep snow. If going up a hill as he mentioned, the TCS system can and will make you lose enough momentum that you get stuck on the hill and the only way to move after that point is now in reverse (if you get stuck and don't start sliding backwards that is).
Probably. I hate that this keep happening. I just had to change all my passwords, and I'm having a hard time remembering it. I'm up to password10 now, and I keep forgetting it isn't password9 anymore.
All results must be an average, and if less than 10 rows are used, then return nothing.
So you've never bought a current generation phone, tablet, PC, or a linksys router? Each of those require a pin for different things. Phones and tablets to remove their SIM chips, PCs and linksys routers to reset their CMOS settings or any device with a CD/DVD/Bluray drive to open it in case it gets "stuck".
Corporations didn't make double-irish legal, the congressmen and representatives you voted for did.
IANAL, but:
Does the US government have the right to sue an Irish company for information on Irish citizens held on servers located in Ireland?
Based on what I know of similar cases, the answer is yes. The typical response is nothing, but if one of the heads of MS-Ireland flies into the US, he can then be held in contempt.
More importantly, does the US Government have the right to sue a US company for that information?
Of course it does. Technically the US Government (or anyone) could so a US company (or anyone else) to give it the names and location of all extraterrestrial aliens it knows about, or all meetings they have had with Santa Claus. It's the judge who decides how to interpret the request, including throwing it out as being unlawful.
That said, there is precedent for such request, such as criminals hiding stolen monies in overseas banks being forced to produce the "keys" or accounts it is stored in. In this case, most people would/could see that is a reasonable request, as hiding money in a foreign bank shouldn't all of a sudden make it untouchable. In the US "data" is owned by the collector of such data in most cases, and from the point of view, if Microsoft owns the data, then according to US law, it could be compelled to produce foreign assets. Then there are all sorts of complicated issues involved like who owns the data, is it MS-US or MS-Ireland. Is MS-Ireland a wholly owned subsidiary of MS-US? Since MS-US is in the US, it could be compelled to request any (US) lawful thing of MS-Ireland. Can MS-Ireland then be legally obligated to produce the data even though illegal in Ireland? MS-US makes the request of MS-Ireland. MS-Ireland complies and produces such data. Ireland then slaps a $500k fine per person affected on MS-Ireland. MS-Ireland then forward the bill to MS-US, which then forwards the bill to the US Government which must then pay it as they are liable for any reasonable and foreseeable costs incurred in complying with such a request. Ireland then sends $100k to each affected individual ($400k per individual to cover their overhead).
There are a good number of government employees who make in salary much more than they would if they weren't in the government sector, but add to that, the benefits packages that many/most government employees get (health, dental, sick leave, vacation, holidays, 401k, pension, and early retirement) and then all of a sudden you have MOST government employees making way more than they would elsewhere.
Hmmm... Never heard of Visual Studio?
Google it. We have 3D printed cars, 3D printed buildings, and of course tons of tiny stuff. Smaller stuff you'll be able to print yourself, more exotic or larger stuff you'll have to go to the local 3D print shop.
I forgot PLEX has the ability to have a central media server (or servers) and all clients can watch anything from any server, and sharing with friends and family (for those graduation and birthday movies of course).
What do you like more about kodi? I'm curious what they've added recently. Granted, I think the UI on the PC client is better than PLEX, however, PLEX has multiple user support (each with their own watched, queue lists), mobile support (with sync), and has a client for just about everything (some better than others). iOS client is good. Android client is ok. Xbox one client is likely the worst of the "official" clients. There is even an unofficial plug in for kodi.