So because 'anyone in power' does it, it doesn't matter whether US goes with Bush or Kerry - it'll end up the same. Therefore you might as well go with Bush. Is that your reasoning ?
You obviously do not frequent the same parts of the Internet that I do. Loads of americans have a semi- if not full fledged religious attitude towards important issues like 'do people swear or not'. In fact in my experience, no other Western country seems so obsessed with it. Getting criticism for NOT swearing to the max. is quite ironic.
Now besides being annoyed that I don't spell out 'fuck' - do you (or any of the 'we' you seem to be a part of) have a comment on the SAT question ?
Sry - just catering for the predominant US. crowd in here. You're absolutely fucking right. (and here's the missing 'or' that I by habit left out of the first word)
I read PJs story on this, and I felt the same when she addressed the profanities. If anything, his far too colourful language betrays him. He who must use language to guise, rather than convey, his message, is not that well off in the first place.
I am far from a 'far right' Christian myself, as you have probably gathered. And one of the things that bothers me about some this worlds major religions, is the way that regulating others behaviour seems to be an integral part. Regulation is in order to a certain extent, like general law enforcement, so that we don't kill and steal too much from each other, but it can be and often is taken too far, very often in the name of a Deity.
I am sidetracking the issue here, I apologize.
Thank you for your dissection, I thoroughly enjoyed the dispassionate way you dismantle his 'stream-of-consciousness' nonsense. Logic is a wonderful tool against nonsense. You had me chuckling all the way, even though I know the core topic is hardly a laughing matter.
Before I have even read Enderle's rant or your dissection off it, I must admit that I am a bit dissappointed by this (from your page):
-- Minor typos and all profanity in the original have been corrected or removed --
As stated I haven't even seen yet what you have removed, but I ask myself "Why would you remove his misspellings, and even more important, his profanities?".
Please understand me when I say this - I am not attacking you, but to me that kind of editing suggests an I-am-better-than-thou attitude which is totally irrelevant to the issue in question.
It seems like mixing religion or morals into what basically is a scientific exercise, thus it TO ME constitutes an even greater violation than the words 'bullshit' et. al. could ever do (in fact using the phrasing 'bullshit' or even worse does not constitute any violation to me whatsoever, It's just color to words and it speaks amble of the speaker).
I try to imagine your reasons, but all I can come up with is some parental discretion motif. Either that or religious zealotry.
The teenagers who are likely to even glance at your (no doubt splendid) work, will probably master profanities to a much wider extent than what I can even imagine Enderle is using, and the spelling errors - well if they can't spell properly at that age, YOU will not be the one who robbed them of that ability.
BTW it also seems counterproductive to your intended goal, which I believe to be: Expose this man and his views for what you think he is: A pompous fool.
Now I'll have to read both your dissection AND the original, if I want to get a complete picture of the way this man talks, and I'll be thinking all the time that you messed with your source. I simply don't understand you did that.
Other than that - I look forward to reading your work, it's just this 'oh no, he said ****' and the constant *beeps* in US american television shows that annoys me. You guys give us Jerry Springer, but you won't let us her the screwed up cast say *BEEP*. The real insult to decency is in the show itself, not in what language they use. The same - I imagine is the case of Mr. Enderle's ravings.
**** Disclaimer: I blatantly assume you are an US American, because that's where censorship of bad words is most widespread in MY sphere of communications. I apologize if I am mistaken.
Also I am not a native english speaker - I probably commit a slew of misspellings and bad phrasings.
Lastly - the censorship of foul mouthed wordings is IMHO pure bovine manure, but I will not let that retract in my enjoyment of what seems to be a fine work of yours.
Where can I read about biometrics not being safe ?
That's very interesting, and I've never heard about it before. I mean surely the pattern in your eyes and your fingerprints are unique and does not change, no ?
Slashdot Mirror
So because 'anyone in power' does it, it doesn't matter whether US goes with Bush or Kerry - it'll end up the same. Therefore you might as well go with Bush. Is that your reasoning ?
Project for the New American CenturyYou obviously do not frequent the same parts of the Internet that I do. Loads of americans have a semi- if not full fledged religious attitude towards important issues like 'do people swear or not'. In fact in my experience, no other Western country seems so obsessed with it. Getting criticism for NOT swearing to the max. is quite ironic.
Now besides being annoyed that I don't spell out 'fuck' - do you (or any of the 'we' you seem to be a part of) have a comment on the SAT question ?
Sry - just catering for the predominant US. crowd in here. You're absolutely fucking right. (and here's the missing 'or' that I by habit left out of the first word)
Ehh... and the current fear mongers in US politics are... ???
Yikes - got all emotional and forgot how to think.
Think about this then: U.S. Parties and Economics
(Shouldn't the less/greater-than signs be converted to HTML entities rather than just deleted ?)
Well think about this then: U.S. Parties and Economics
Are SAT tests those multiple choice ones ?
If so - I don't give a fsck for the result, which btw. adequately sums up my feelings for Bush
> Turning it umop apisdn causes the same problem,
Easy for you to say !
If there's a Burger King around, I'd NEVER eat a McAnything. If there ISN'T a Burger King around, I'd still never eat a McAnything
So in order to not look scared, you suggest that they kept their lying, war-mongering Gvt. in place ?
Hmmm... that's an interesting POV, I am sure Bush et al. subsribes to that as well...
They didn't cave. They threw out a Gvt. that lied to them. The new Gvt. was against the war from the outset.
Here's a link for a load of Bush quotes - it's hilarious !
Check out dbDesigner4.
They stopped development, apparently the guys doing it got jobs with MySQL.
Somebody should pick it up, it's very good. Really makes it a breeze to design your DB.
Link seems to be down right now....
If you search for 'wet sexy girl' the top his is a xnxx.com page - they're a good tgp in regards to quantity and quality, google IS power :)
A further proof of the fact that google is very good: try searching for 'miserable failure'
Well mebbe that's an old joke - I only saw it today and I am still laughing
That's good - I think u are the only one who got that point (I didn't).
:)
Mod this guy up
Linuxinsider or Laura dIdiot to start referencing this
I read PJs story on this, and I felt the same when she addressed the profanities. If anything, his far too colourful language betrays him. He who must use language to guise, rather than convey, his message, is not that well off in the first place.
I am far from a 'far right' Christian myself, as you have probably gathered. And one of the things that bothers me about some this worlds major religions, is the way that regulating others behaviour seems to be an integral part. Regulation is in order to a certain extent, like general law enforcement, so that we don't kill and steal too much from each other, but it can be and often is taken too far, very often in the name of a Deity.
I am sidetracking the issue here, I apologize.
Thank you for your dissection, I thoroughly enjoyed the dispassionate way you dismantle his 'stream-of-consciousness' nonsense. Logic is a wonderful tool against nonsense. You had me chuckling all the way, even though I know the core topic is hardly a laughing matter.
Splendid job !
Eh ? Didn't think that thin clients had 'all that computing power' ?
Before I have even read Enderle's rant or your dissection off it, I must admit that I am a bit dissappointed by this (from your page):
--
Minor typos and all profanity in the original have been corrected or removed
--
As stated I haven't even seen yet what you have removed, but I ask myself "Why would you remove his misspellings, and even more important, his profanities?".
Please understand me when I say this - I am not attacking you, but to me that kind of editing suggests an I-am-better-than-thou attitude which is totally irrelevant to the issue in question.
It seems like mixing religion or morals into what basically is a scientific exercise, thus it TO ME constitutes an even greater violation than the words 'bullshit' et. al. could ever do (in fact using the phrasing 'bullshit' or even worse does not constitute any violation to me whatsoever, It's just color to words and it speaks amble of the speaker).
I try to imagine your reasons, but all I can come up with is some parental discretion motif. Either that or religious zealotry.
The teenagers who are likely to even glance at your (no doubt splendid) work, will probably master profanities to a much wider extent than what I can even imagine Enderle is using, and the spelling errors - well if they can't spell properly at that age, YOU will not be the one who robbed them of that ability.
BTW it also seems counterproductive to your intended goal, which I believe to be: Expose this man and his views for what you think he is: A pompous fool.
Now I'll have to read both your dissection AND the original, if I want to get a complete picture of the way this man talks, and I'll be thinking all the time that you messed with your source. I simply don't understand you did that.
Other than that - I look forward to reading your work, it's just this 'oh no, he said ****' and the constant *beeps* in US american television shows that annoys me. You guys give us Jerry Springer, but you won't let us her the screwed up cast say *BEEP*. The real insult to decency is in the show itself, not in what language they use. The same - I imagine is the case of Mr. Enderle's ravings.
****
Disclaimer: I blatantly assume you are an US American, because that's where censorship of bad words is most widespread in MY sphere of communications. I apologize if I am mistaken.
Also I am not a native english speaker - I probably commit a slew of misspellings and bad phrasings.
Lastly - the censorship of foul mouthed wordings is IMHO pure bovine manure, but I will not let that retract in my enjoyment of what seems to be a fine work of yours.
Regards
Off reading...
> No, they are dead, it is just gas escaping their lungs.
/lungs/
Doesn't smell like it's escaping from their
A deeper implication could be that many believe SCOs scam to be initiated and funded by Microsoft
That's a 'best practise' tip - not a standard, other than that I am now off to shoot myself for failure to comply :-)
Click here
Read here
This CMS already uses it, I bet others do as well
Yeah - but he forgets you get a license to run Linux as well, you don't get that with either RedHat or Microsoft !!
Where can I read about biometrics not being safe ?
That's very interesting, and I've never heard about it before. I mean surely the pattern in your eyes and your fingerprints are unique and does not change, no ?