Perhaps just dealing with INTEL is enough to ruin everything. Its too bad MAC has such problems navigating about & performing chores in first place. NEVER FORGET:"MAC IS CRAP".Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
OH,Those Tombs....ha,ha.Anyway, If you look closely at reported "ALABASTER" pots, filled with Meat, gift to take ith ones souls journey OR PERHAPS ORGANS FROM DEAD, you will notice that they are not marble at all, just simple red clay fired with white GLAZE. Also I read that this, like Churhes of today, Was storage area where prestadigitations could be effected,in this case. so living would not be "truly" buried with dead, only these prepared "volunteers", ready to go.Storehouse of BEARERS for King.http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/tut_g allery4_thumb.jpgSigned:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRSHEK M.D.
In spite of CUTTING EDGE technology, up till now ALL game boxs seems to fizzile from day of market entry.I'll believe it if holds audiance for year, yet so far odds are 0% console, 100% PC.
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Fantrsy article. First treat skin Sores directly on wound & by mouth with Antibiotics from Mexico(duty free).While taking B Balanced Complex, 250 mgm daily forces renewed nuro growth. Sunshine when over 90F to draw wounds to surface. Cleaniness. Distilled water. Acyliviour. AZT(zuduvirane).About 15 years of time to rest. Its much better to stay clean than try to "cure" disease on edge of fatal strength.aNTI BIOTICS REDUCE YOU, eXERCISE REBUILDS YOU, vITAMINES Sustain you. Sunshine accerates healing & excrusion process.
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Oh, yeah. That King TUT. Now I remember. TUT was injured all right, was stuck in knee cap, instead of being captured, TUT requested head smashed in, It took few days to negoiate return of body (fight into & retrieve), so infection had set into knee, as that wound was bit older than brain smash, way enemy left it when overpowered.Signed:HRM PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
If TUT is missing its' Pee-Pee it probably was regacide. Lucky TUT had mortal wound or TUT would still be alive today.
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Why "do" oldie active X (IE6 Coding)& open up problems. Oldies are oldies, get with it or view "gibberish".Its not like upgrade costs anything & is updated automatically for most.
http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Make 'em ALL "QUICK TABS" Now.
on
IE7 Leaked
·
· Score: 1
Unfortuneately lower speed can only last so long. Amd stuck with outside processor "HYPER TRANSPORT" that can't take much more than DDR 400, basic work in processor (before cache is even involved) can now reach much higher speeds than AMD works with.Higher speed pci express with 40 or 96 lanes leaves AMD confused & in dust bin. AMD has zram & other exciting pumps, besides going DDR-2, yet hyper transport bus won't do in its present speed, gAME cARDS ARE ABOUT TO GO ABOVE HYPER TRANSPORT SPEEDS.IT JUST WON'T WORK WITH THAT "CLOG".
http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Heres some pretty good science thanks to HOTFIX, I Listed what HOTFIX called SP3. They work & work very well.Media fixes seem most powerful, as well as large file sizes, stay away from catalog indexing or anything that slow computer down, just remove or restore, theres no trojan TOTAL WAR blitz kreig at all in there, JUST SEVERAL SLOGS MIXED INTO MESS.
http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
As Police Officer I have infiltrated Usenet & they are BAD. TERRIBLE more accurate. USENET migrated to GOOGLE as no one would pay $9.95 monthly for that CRAP. Make complaints, for good of our nation. To get feel of problem, enter Drugs into google search bar. 3/4 of links are inactive, yet some e.g. Alt.Drug Rec.Drug etc are ILLEGAL DRUG PARADISE. Thru USENETS' own local Storefront law schools, they will even deliver ILLEGAL NARCOTICS to your door front, just pay man & its' your. Talk about corrupt & insane, they got it all. "HOW" you ask, USENETb is "MANDAN" tribe of indians from Mandan/Bismark North Dakota, THEY got rights too, ya know. Thanks & complain, Heres list of proposed UPDATES THAT hOTFIX called: WINDOWS SP3; to work with. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
For those that missed joy of SP3 for WINDOWS XP cataloged by private source, I listed all updates that it contained. I had good luck with all except couple, so be prepared for "RESTORE" OR "ADD/DELETE" when you get LOGIE on updates.Any trouble will be slowdown from that last one specific update, not whole mess, which really helps computer puurrr.
http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Today 3d mark '05 was replaced. It had trouble all year keeping up with sli & dual core changes, while only testing shader model 2. Over year scores seemed to stagnate, yet each new release of 3D mark '05 simply pushed all previous scores lower. Now one card can expect up to 10,000 in 3d mark '05. In 3D mark '06 shader model 3 is tested, sli & dual core are better addressed, while game card & cpu are both evaluated, before only gpu was evaluated. Its' 576 mb download & available at all usual sources. Awaitng Published Results.
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
I thought those cores are serial, if not, its' not as great. It didn't look THAT great at C.E.S '6, which was merely "Mock Up", as it turned out.
Yet, if you increase core speed, as in todays top game cards to 700 mhz/sec & increase memory speed to 1.6 ghz/sec & run dual gpu on dual OR LATEST INTERGRATED(All 4 coordinate into one display output) QUAD card system, numbers probably could, even today, beat "cell".
That costs at least: $4,000.oo.
Also AMD/INTEL is solid 4 core mfg. by 2008, not 32 core. 32 core barely is better than 8 core, only 25% faster, so don't hold your breath there.
Within 3 years solutions to beat "cell" are certain. yet PUBLIC wants 1080p. 1080p needs 150 mb/sec output deveice. Thats 150,000,000 times 7,200 seconds in 2 hours & your in "HOLOGRAPHIC DISC" territory only. Optical Disc layering is just too soft for that much.
"Cell" should be able to hit Extended Eefination now, however, 12 mb/sec, Maybe more,looks like "Cell" will come in on top of performance pack or flop.Yet, its' going to be 5 or even 10 years before output is up to quality demanded by Public right now.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D..
Oppsie- Theres no such thing as 6 bit identifier bit in home desktop consumer computing (in general), they all come in units of 4 bit bitwidth ends units. I seldom think about this & I knew theres' some "trick" I was missing while I typed above post & there is. I.B.M. is using 8 bit bitwidth in opening statement, while only 4 bit bitwidth in closing statment. This is simple, as I stated iA32 uses only 4 bit bitwidth ends, so EMT64 nor iA64 can use 4 bit opening statement or your computer processor would turn itself into iA32 mode or at least be confused & start hacking bit strings up, it needs to know that software is compatable with processor internal archetecture, so bits going thru Intel have 3 4bit bitwidth statements in opening statement or it just won't fly, while AMD needs only 2 4 bit bitwidth in opening statement & same amount as opening is true for closing of each. While IBM uses same 2 4bit bitwidth opening statement as AMD, IBM knows that 1 4bit bitwidth is enough to close statement as thats all iA32 has. Once statement of closing goes thru comparrisson unit, string activeity stops until new opening statement arrives. It takes someone smarter than INTEL or AMD to figure that out? No, they all collude to do software in their own archetectured processor that meets reputation of each company. INTEL has faster clock rate and/or multiplier so althought bit string is smaller, more bits strings go thru per second than AMD. Intel uses extreme redundancy (parrallism)to hack thru almost any problem, so error due to high speed are just gone over again until correct output is realized. Amd crafts movement thru processor better, so that wider bitwidth allows same amount of bit processing per second to occur, yet at slower coreXmulitplier rate.That may be where AMD is weak, as gamecards at top end go twice as fast with 50% more transistors. More tranistors means more power software can express, yet at slower final rate per clock cycle. Can AMD "leap" to higher frequencies while doing more computing per string & increase tranistor count to tomorrows desktop demands, which simply means move workstation processing to desktop? Well, opteron is workstation processor & it has great reviews, yet if you look at actual clock speed, it is often quite low(due to large cache that means lots more tranistors to control multi tasking aspect of workstation)), so other factors, such as 65 nm (lets think how about "quntum" size tranistor gates,just for extremeness. Faster memory with on board controller may keep AMD on top for quite sometime. Until IBM gets "cell" processor into supercomputer market, then IBM may kick some real booty again in #1 position in consumer market.
Ah SO SORRY ABOUT THAT 6 BIT basicly "ALBATROSSE" QUIP IN PREVIOUS POST (although who really knows),I BELIEVE THERE CAN BE NO SUCH THING IN iA32/iA64 nor EMT64, maybe in "albatrose" processsors like 586 that needs special encoding & that normally arn't even used except in most secure areas. Yet can do unusual decoding to move into & out of 486 to display for those terminals or internet online stuff that "banks" & other highly secured computers may have output use as some type of specialty identifier within "secured" level of archetecture,so its own software would be prevelant or only one, other common software or processor/translator outputs have to go to another processor or controller(or core?)that uses ethier 4 or 6 bit seperately within same enviorment of multi bit bitwidth multiples with each end same or unique.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Its' important concept to remember in "desktop" processor choices'. If you go 64 bit, iA64 or EMT64 are not same. Amd uses iA64 i stands for Intel, as it works as well as iA32 SO ITS BOTH 32 BIT & 64 BIT COMPATIBLE. However, iA64 is 48 bitwidth, while EMT64 is only 40 bitwidth & IS Intels "emulated" 64 bit processor ("EMULATED" simply means its not as much as iA64, yet runs same software as iA64 can. So AMD does more per clock with wider bitwidth, yet IBM, not to be outdone by just "anyone", is going to desktop standard that is even larger in bitwidth, it is rumoured to be 52? bitwidth. Why not 64 bitwidth, well, lots o' stuff has to be engineered first, one step at time, filling in how those bitwidths are used. By stepping up slowly most efficent useage of each bit is ensured (as well as being able to run 32 bit or 64 bit software with iA64), also "identifier" bits on both ends of each bit string take up remander of available space,units of 4 bitwidth are common end(s) identifier length, yet its too much in "unknown" zone to state exactly what IBM will do,just simple math says Intel 12bit bitwidth ends, AMD 8 bit biteidth bit ends, IBM 6 bit or 4 bit bitwidth ends.32 bit computing (iA32) uses 4 bit bitwidth ends.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D..
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps just dealing with INTEL is enough to ruin everything. Its too bad MAC has such problems navigating about & performing chores in first place. NEVER FORGET:"MAC IS CRAP".Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
OH,Those Tombs....ha,ha.Anyway, If you look closely at reported "ALABASTER" pots, filled with Meat, gift to take ith ones souls journey OR PERHAPS ORGANS FROM DEAD, you will notice that they are not marble at all, just simple red clay fired with white GLAZE. Also I read that this, like Churhes of today, Was storage area where prestadigitations could be effected,in this case. so living would not be "truly" buried with dead, only these prepared "volunteers", ready to go.Storehouse of BEARERS for King.http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/tut_g allery4_thumb.jpgSigned:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRSHEK M.D.
In spite of CUTTING EDGE technology, up till now ALL game boxs seems to fizzile from day of market entry.I'll believe it if holds audiance for year, yet so far odds are 0% console, 100% PC. Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Fantrsy article. First treat skin Sores directly on wound & by mouth with Antibiotics from Mexico(duty free).While taking B Balanced Complex, 250 mgm daily forces renewed nuro growth. Sunshine when over 90F to draw wounds to surface. Cleaniness. Distilled water. Acyliviour. AZT(zuduvirane).About 15 years of time to rest. Its much better to stay clean than try to "cure" disease on edge of fatal strength.aNTI BIOTICS REDUCE YOU, eXERCISE REBUILDS YOU, vITAMINES Sustain you. Sunshine accerates healing & excrusion process. Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Oh, yeah. That King TUT. Now I remember. TUT was injured all right, was stuck in knee cap, instead of being captured, TUT requested head smashed in, It took few days to negoiate return of body (fight into & retrieve), so infection had set into knee, as that wound was bit older than brain smash, way enemy left it when overpowered.Signed:HRM PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Oh BTW, TUT was real oinker, TUT was queer. (or BI- something)? Why does that seem so long ago? Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
If TUT is missing its' Pee-Pee it probably was regacide. Lucky TUT had mortal wound or TUT would still be alive today. Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Why "do" oldie active X (IE6 Coding)& open up problems. Oldies are oldies, get with it or view "gibberish".Its not like upgrade costs anything & is updated automatically for most. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
"QUICK TABS" are another IE 7 feature, with tabs opening up inside other displayed tabs. YIPPIE! SP3 & VISTA BETA: http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Unfortuneately lower speed can only last so long. Amd stuck with outside processor "HYPER TRANSPORT" that can't take much more than DDR 400, basic work in processor (before cache is even involved) can now reach much higher speeds than AMD works with.Higher speed pci express with 40 or 96 lanes leaves AMD confused & in dust bin. AMD has zram & other exciting pumps, besides going DDR-2, yet hyper transport bus won't do in its present speed, gAME cARDS ARE ABOUT TO GO ABOVE HYPER TRANSPORT SPEEDS.IT JUST WON'T WORK WITH THAT "CLOG". http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Just after I wrote all that down & made my second website in 7 years, oops, out comes original, I just downloaded it, so remember use Romanian mirror for fastest service. http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/OS-Enhancement s/Windows-XP-Service-Pack-3-Preview.shtml
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Heres some pretty good science thanks to HOTFIX, I Listed what HOTFIX called SP3. They work & work very well.Media fixes seem most powerful, as well as large file sizes, stay away from catalog indexing or anything that slow computer down, just remove or restore, theres no trojan TOTAL WAR blitz kreig at all in there, JUST SEVERAL SLOGS MIXED INTO MESS. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
As Police Officer I have infiltrated Usenet & they are BAD. TERRIBLE more accurate. USENET migrated to GOOGLE as no one would pay $9.95 monthly for that CRAP. Make complaints, for good of our nation. To get feel of problem, enter Drugs into google search bar. 3/4 of links are inactive, yet some e.g. Alt.Drug Rec.Drug etc are ILLEGAL DRUG PARADISE. Thru USENETS' own local Storefront law schools, they will even deliver ILLEGAL NARCOTICS to your door front, just pay man & its' your. Talk about corrupt & insane, they got it all. "HOW" you ask, USENETb is "MANDAN" tribe of indians from Mandan/Bismark North Dakota, THEY got rights too, ya know. Thanks & complain, Heres list of proposed UPDATES THAT hOTFIX called: WINDOWS SP3; to work with. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
For those that missed joy of SP3 for WINDOWS XP cataloged by private source, I listed all updates that it contained. I had good luck with all except couple, so be prepared for "RESTORE" OR "ADD/DELETE" when you get LOGIE on updates.Any trouble will be slowdown from that last one specific update, not whole mess, which really helps computer puurrr. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Today 3d mark '05 was replaced. It had trouble all year keeping up with sli & dual core changes, while only testing shader model 2. Over year scores seemed to stagnate, yet each new release of 3D mark '05 simply pushed all previous scores lower. Now one card can expect up to 10,000 in 3d mark '05. In 3D mark '06 shader model 3 is tested, sli & dual core are better addressed, while game card & cpu are both evaluated, before only gpu was evaluated. Its' 576 mb download & available at all usual sources. Awaitng Published Results. Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
I thought those cores are serial, if not, its' not as great. It didn't look THAT great at C.E.S '6, which was merely "Mock Up", as it turned out. Yet, if you increase core speed, as in todays top game cards to 700 mhz/sec & increase memory speed to 1.6 ghz/sec & run dual gpu on dual OR LATEST INTERGRATED(All 4 coordinate into one display output) QUAD card system, numbers probably could, even today, beat "cell". That costs at least: $4,000.oo. Also AMD/INTEL is solid 4 core mfg. by 2008, not 32 core. 32 core barely is better than 8 core, only 25% faster, so don't hold your breath there. Within 3 years solutions to beat "cell" are certain. yet PUBLIC wants 1080p. 1080p needs 150 mb/sec output deveice. Thats 150,000,000 times 7,200 seconds in 2 hours & your in "HOLOGRAPHIC DISC" territory only. Optical Disc layering is just too soft for that much. "Cell" should be able to hit Extended Eefination now, however, 12 mb/sec, Maybe more,looks like "Cell" will come in on top of performance pack or flop.Yet, its' going to be 5 or even 10 years before output is up to quality demanded by Public right now.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D..
Oppsie- Theres no such thing as 6 bit identifier bit in home desktop consumer computing (in general), they all come in units of 4 bit bitwidth ends units. I seldom think about this & I knew theres' some "trick" I was missing while I typed above post & there is. I.B.M. is using 8 bit bitwidth in opening statement, while only 4 bit bitwidth in closing statment. This is simple, as I stated iA32 uses only 4 bit bitwidth ends, so EMT64 nor iA64 can use 4 bit opening statement or your computer processor would turn itself into iA32 mode or at least be confused & start hacking bit strings up, it needs to know that software is compatable with processor internal archetecture, so bits going thru Intel have 3 4bit bitwidth statements in opening statement or it just won't fly, while AMD needs only 2 4 bit bitwidth in opening statement & same amount as opening is true for closing of each. While IBM uses same 2 4bit bitwidth opening statement as AMD, IBM knows that 1 4bit bitwidth is enough to close statement as thats all iA32 has. Once statement of closing goes thru comparrisson unit, string activeity stops until new opening statement arrives. It takes someone smarter than INTEL or AMD to figure that out? No, they all collude to do software in their own archetectured processor that meets reputation of each company. INTEL has faster clock rate and/or multiplier so althought bit string is smaller, more bits strings go thru per second than AMD. Intel uses extreme redundancy (parrallism)to hack thru almost any problem, so error due to high speed are just gone over again until correct output is realized. Amd crafts movement thru processor better, so that wider bitwidth allows same amount of bit processing per second to occur, yet at slower coreXmulitplier rate.That may be where AMD is weak, as gamecards at top end go twice as fast with 50% more transistors. More tranistors means more power software can express, yet at slower final rate per clock cycle. Can AMD "leap" to higher frequencies while doing more computing per string & increase tranistor count to tomorrows desktop demands, which simply means move workstation processing to desktop? Well, opteron is workstation processor & it has great reviews, yet if you look at actual clock speed, it is often quite low(due to large cache that means lots more tranistors to control multi tasking aspect of workstation)), so other factors, such as 65 nm (lets think how about "quntum" size tranistor gates,just for extremeness. Faster memory with on board controller may keep AMD on top for quite sometime. Until IBM gets "cell" processor into supercomputer market, then IBM may kick some real booty again in #1 position in consumer market. Ah SO SORRY ABOUT THAT 6 BIT basicly "ALBATROSSE" QUIP IN PREVIOUS POST (although who really knows),I BELIEVE THERE CAN BE NO SUCH THING IN iA32/iA64 nor EMT64, maybe in "albatrose" processsors like 586 that needs special encoding & that normally arn't even used except in most secure areas. Yet can do unusual decoding to move into & out of 486 to display for those terminals or internet online stuff that "banks" & other highly secured computers may have output use as some type of specialty identifier within "secured" level of archetecture,so its own software would be prevelant or only one, other common software or processor/translator outputs have to go to another processor or controller(or core?)that uses ethier 4 or 6 bit seperately within same enviorment of multi bit bitwidth multiples with each end same or unique.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
Its' important concept to remember in "desktop" processor choices'. If you go 64 bit, iA64 or EMT64 are not same. Amd uses iA64 i stands for Intel, as it works as well as iA32 SO ITS BOTH 32 BIT & 64 BIT COMPATIBLE. However, iA64 is 48 bitwidth, while EMT64 is only 40 bitwidth & IS Intels "emulated" 64 bit processor ("EMULATED" simply means its not as much as iA64, yet runs same software as iA64 can. So AMD does more per clock with wider bitwidth, yet IBM, not to be outdone by just "anyone", is going to desktop standard that is even larger in bitwidth, it is rumoured to be 52? bitwidth. Why not 64 bitwidth, well, lots o' stuff has to be engineered first, one step at time, filling in how those bitwidths are used. By stepping up slowly most efficent useage of each bit is ensured (as well as being able to run 32 bit or 64 bit software with iA64), also "identifier" bits on both ends of each bit string take up remander of available space,units of 4 bitwidth are common end(s) identifier length, yet its too much in "unknown" zone to state exactly what IBM will do,just simple math says Intel 12bit bitwidth ends, AMD 8 bit biteidth bit ends, IBM 6 bit or 4 bit bitwidth ends.32 bit computing (iA32) uses 4 bit bitwidth ends.Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D..