Slashdot Mirror


King Tut Killed by a Knee Infection?

adminsr writes to tell us the Discovery Channel is reporting that an Egyptian-led research team claims to have found compelling new evidence relating to the cause of death of King Tutankhamen From the article: "According to the Italian doctors, it was likely that King Tut suffered a violent blow, most likely by a sword. The blow would have lodged gold fragments from the decorations of the Pharaoh's armour or dress into the knee."

152 comments

  1. Obvious... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Never demonstrate how your subjects should bow down to you while holding a sword.

    1. Re:Obvious... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And never ever preceed it with a royal proclamation of "Hey! Watch this!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  2. So... by Darlantan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean that King Tut developed 'Gold Fever'?

    --
    Fill in your four or five-letter word of wisdom here _ _ _ _ _.
    1. Re:So... by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      No, but I'm sure all combat vets know it was a golden injury!

      --
      I am Spartacus
    2. Re:So... by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      Maybe all he needed was a shmoke and a pancake.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that would have done it, because, after all: What, can stop that itchin', ain't, around the kitchen.

  3. Easy Discovery by imoou · · Score: 3, Funny

    King Tut's left index finger is pointing at his wound.

  4. form vs. function by quintesson · · Score: 4, Funny

    This must have set the gold armour industry back centuries.

    1. Re:form vs. function by darkmeridian · · Score: 2

      Once a king went jousting wearing a gold visor. Well, gold's expensive, but not exactly hard--in fact, pure gold is very malleable. Long story short, king gets hit in gold visor, visor shatters, piece hits eye, king dies. Lesson: if you happen to be Medieval royalty, wear goldfoiled steel (or iron) armor.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:form vs. function by ultranova · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lesson: if you happen to be Medieval royalty, wear goldfoiled steel (or iron) armor.

      Better yet, wear perfectly ordinary steel armor. That way every enemy archer won't be able to aim at you from the other end of the battlefield. Wearing an armor that screams "target me !" just to appease your vanity is a really stupid thing to do.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:form vs. function by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      That's why they call it "Bling-bling" these days.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:form vs. function by bipolarpinguino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just do what leaders do today and not goto war at all and sit on your fat ass at home.

    5. Re:form vs. function by VagaStorm · · Score: 1

      I think the idea of beeing seen on the battle field is somwhere in the lines of: fight on, se the king still fights with us :p

    6. Re:form vs. function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was quite the opposite: once the leader was dead, the troops were meant to stop fighting.

      The king being very visible could confirm to his troops that he was still alive, and it provided good morale.

      Posted anon, because it's off topic.

    7. Re:form vs. function by jrockway · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Wearing an armor that screams "target me !" just to appease your vanity is a really stupid thing to do.

      Modern day parallel: iPod headphones.

      --
      My other car is first.
    8. Re:form vs. function by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      Better yet, wear perfectly ordinary steel armor. That way every enemy archer won't be able to aim at you from the other end of the battlefield. Wearing an armor that screams "target me !" just to appease your vanity is a really stupid thing to do.

      Acutally, the best thing to do would be to paint a target on your shield. Very hard for them to aim anywhere else, and that's what you want them to hit.

      --unapologetic old SCA'er

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    9. Re:form vs. function by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      King Tut was not "Medieval royalty" and lived long before steel was invented. A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    10. Re:form vs. function by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Ah, but in medieval times a leader was a good ransom target. Rather than bump you off at long distance with an arrow, often they'd like to get their hands on you alive and make themselves an instant fortune.

      They didn't just make this up for Medieval: Total War...

  5. Obligatory Bangels reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It must have been difficult to "Walk like an Egyptian" after that.

    Right, I'll get my coat.

    1. Re:Obligatory Bangels reference by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      Nice :). But wouldn't however he walked have been walking like an Egyptian, by definition?

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  6. Could it be.... by d474 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that King Tut was killed by the "Knights That Say 'Ni'!"?

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    1. Re:Could it be.... by d474 · · Score: 1

      Archaeologists have some audio evidence of this epic battle:
      The Ni File

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
    2. Re:Could it be.... by fredistheking · · Score: 1

      We are now no longer the Knights Who Say Ni.
      We are now the Knights Who Say Ecky- ecky- ecky- ecky- pikang- zoop- boing- goodem- zoo- owli- ziv.

    3. Re:Could it be.... by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...that King Tut was killed by the "Knights That Say 'Ni'!"?



      All that golden splendor, but killed for want of a shrubbery. Tragic, really.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    4. Re:Could it be.... by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      ...that King Tut was killed by the "Knights That Say 'Ni'!"?

      ...with a herring?

  7. Interesting by mabu · · Score: 3, Funny

    I find it very interesting that Italian doctors are speculating King Tut had a knee injury. Maybe he had a few outstanding debts from gambling on some camel races?

    1. Re:Interesting by Bob+McCown · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nice Pyramids. Wouldn't want anything to happen to them, now, would you?

  8. We're privileged by SigILL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's interesting about this is that in king Tut's days wounds like that generally were lethal. How privileged we are living in this modern age (and having access to anti-biotics)!

    --
    Error: password can't contain reverse spelling of ancient Chinese emperor
    1. Re:We're privileged by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

      What's interesting about this is that in king Tut's days wounds like that generally were lethal. How privileged we are living in this modern age (and having access to anti-biotics)!

      Yeah, I think that every time I'm in a sword fight! ;)

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    2. Re:We're privileged by yogikoudou · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed we are.
      More information about this:
      I saw a documentary a few weeks ago on the death of Tutankhamun, and they were coming to this conclusion as well. The first hypothesis were that he had been killed, as a piece of bone was missing at the back of his skull; blood was also present around this hole. It turned out that it might have been made during embalming.
      They were also speculating on the many fractures the mummy presented. They were annoyed by the really bad general state of the body, mainly because the first people to discover it cut it into pieces to move it easily (it was stuck by dried body and embalming fluids in the golden coffin). This didn't help them in thei search for lethal wounds, until they found this piece of bone near the knee.
      The king broke his leg near the knee, and died about a week later (they know it by looking at the amount of cartilage that started to grow on the broken bone).
      Their conclusion was that this wound wouldn't have been lethal in our days, thanks to antibiotics.
      It was a really interesting documentary, and quite a fascinating search (determining the cause of death 3300 years after it happened).

    3. Re:We're privileged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ancient Egyptians treated their wounds with a substance almost as effective as modern day antibiotics - honey. Actually, with many bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics, there is renewed interest in using honey medically. No word yet on whether gold armor will be coming back into vogue anytime soon.

      http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/alternative/03 /08/honey.healing.wmd/

    4. Re:We're privileged by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      What's interesting about this is that in king Tut's days wounds like that generally were lethal. How privileged we are living in this modern age (and having access to anti-biotics)!

      Yeah, I think that every time I'm in a sword fight! ;)

      Actually, you should think about that every time you're not in a swordfight.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    5. Re:We're privileged by valintin · · Score: 1

      You should think about it everytime you see a limbless veteran.

    6. Re:We're privileged by restlesscheese · · Score: 1

      I'll have you know that I happen to get into swordfights every Tuesday and Wednesday!

      Mind you, a fencing foil isn't very dangerous, but still...

      --
      I am Whovian. Hear me *vworp!*
    7. Re:We're privileged by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. And we've blown it. Bacteria are developing resistance, and some researchers believe community-based MSRA could be widespread in our lifetimes.

  9. I think.. by seabre · · Score: 5, Funny

    death due to pimp accessories is pretty bad ass.

  10. Worlds first Bling death by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    the blow would have lodged gold fragments from the decorations of the Pharaoh's armour or dress into the knee."

    And the writing was litterally on the wall.

    Kids dont do bling.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  11. How many ways can the guy die? by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't we get a better source for these things than the discovery channel? I rarely watch TV and yet I have STILL seen three documentaries explaining how King Tut died, all in different ways. Died from an infection due to gold dust? I guess it is possible, but it seems fairly far fetched to me. Is there a reason that they didn't publish their findings in a regular journal like Nature or Science or whatever journal Egyptologists use? The whole thing seems rather like fools gold to me.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The whole thing seems rather like fools gold to me.

      Yeah, kind of like a pyramid scheme.

    2. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by stonecypher · · Score: 4, Informative

      No no, the gold dust didn't cause the infection. Gold is a noble metal, and is non-toxic. It's just that we found little gold bits embedded in his knee that look like pieces of armor, and that means he got stabbed or slashed, and back in those days, that pretty much always meant infection anyway. With that context, what is known about how he died makes much more sense, and so now a knee infection - the gold is just evidence of the wound - is the most likely cause of death.

      Is there a reason that they didn't publish their findings in a regular journal like Nature or Science or whatever journal Egyptologists use?

      Er, they did. Slashdot just doesn't cover those. Thing is, we *do* cover physics journals, and the method they used to detect the gold in the first place is of interest to physicists. This also got into medical journals and traveller's journals (national geographic being the only traveller's journal most people recognize.)

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Feh. Another crackpot theory.

      I don't know that much about physiology or medicine, but based on what I know about King Tut I'd say that what killed him was shoveling his guts into clay pots, wrapping him in bandages, and burying his ass in the middle of the desert.

      Based on observation of current-day politicians I cannot say for certain whether sucking his brains out through his nose was a contributing factor.

      Bemopolis

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    4. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by damsa · · Score: 1

      The source isn't Discovery Channel. The actual source is the Alto Adige daily newspaper. Its not even the discovery channel, it is the Discovery news that has translated the article for your enjoyment and pleasure.

    5. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also think I saw something on the discovery channel about Tut having some sort of spine deformity (scoliosis?) and they cited that as the reason for all his canes.
      Also, the article says nothing about when he would have been hit with a sword. That is, was there a war going on at the time? Does anyone even know what was happening during his lifetime?

    6. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Died from an infection due to gold dust?

      I feel a fourth Discovery Channel documentary coming on: King Tut - Human, or Cyberman?

    7. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by rayhigh · · Score: 0

      It was the gold dust - King Tut was a Cyberman! Quick, into the TARDIS, Sarah and Harry...

    8. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      I can't help thinking that Tut's death was the JFK assassination of his day. "It was the Mafia with a stone club to the back of his head! No, the Cubans with a sword to the knee! No, the CIA gave him the plague! I've got a witness who saw an archer on the grassy knoll!"

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Buran · · Score: 1

      No, it was Col. Mustard in the foyer with the candlestick.

    10. Re:How many ways can the guy die? by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1
      Can't we get a better source for these things than the discovery channel?

      Actually, it was National Geographic. I saw it, and it was pretty compelling. Of course, with no antibiotics and little knowledge how to deal with infections, a large knee injury will usually kill people in the course of a few days. Completely sensible. A swordfight training accident sounds like a plausible cause.

      The head injury/sneak attack theory was debunked - that damage happened long after death.

      --
      I'm in a Unix state of mind.
  12. How about the 130 walking sticks??? by technoextreme · · Score: 0
    Indeed, about 130 walking sticks found among King Tut's fabulous treasure would support the theory he may have had trouble with walking during the last days of his life.

    Errrr... You think???? Why did anyone in their right minds find this unusual?? I can only think of the one reason and that there was 130 of everything in the tomb. Also, how hard is it to find an arrorhead in a body??
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:How about the 130 walking sticks??? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who said anything about unusual? For that matter, who said anything about an arrowhead? Tutankhamen was believed to have died from a blow to the head which led to partial paralysis, hence the walking sticks, but now we found scraps of gold in the knee which look like decorations from armor, suggesting he healed over a wound from presumably a sword which gave way to infection which killed him.

      How that got modded informative is beyond me.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    2. Re:How about the 130 walking sticks??? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Nat'l Geographic story on the CT scans debunks the head injury. IIRC, the Nat'l Geo TV special described the knee injury as bad enough that it ripped a knee cap off. There was some question about whether the knee injury was caused near time of death or was a result of Carter's butchery at time of discovery. Carter's team did a lot of damage to Tut, but the Nat'l Geo team found the presence of structures that demonstrated that the knee was trying to heal. From the size of the structures, which have a known rate of change, the team estimated that he died 3 days after the blow.

    3. Re:How about the 130 walking sticks??? by wiresquire · · Score: 4, Funny

      "...but the Nat'l Geo team found the presence of structures that demonstrated that the knee was trying to heal."

      Perhaps the mummy was regenerating ?!!???!!!

      AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH! Run !! Must get away!

      --

      So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  13. Armor? by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Armor that covered the knee? This was 1500 BC not AD.

    Also, I thought Egyptians were advanced enough to have dealt with infections from wounds. Poison? Maybe an accidental and embarrasing wound that he wouldn't let someone attend?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Armor? by dlasley · · Score: 1
      No matter how advanced they were, nothing indicates they had any more understanding of antibiotics than other cultures of similar cultural and scientific precedence:
      From Wikipedia
      Many ancient cultures, including the ancient Greeks and ancient Chinese, already used moulds and other plants to treat infection. This worked because some moulds produce antibiotic substances. However, they couldn't distinguish or distill the active component in the moulds.
      We've only had them as a class of drug for the past ~80 years, thanks to Alexander Fleming, Howard Florey and Ernst Boris Chain, and it wasn't even widely used until World War II.

      Now, poison is an intriguing idea and an interesting point of research. Was poisoning prevalent in the days of Tutankhamen, and who would dare use it against a King, knowing such an action, if discovered, could lead to drastic retribution? My curiosity is piqued, and thus my productivity is about to decline rapidly as I start bringing up history sites in other tabs ...

      &laz;
      --
      when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
    2. Re:Armor? by stonecypher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Armor that covered the knee? This was 1500 BC not AD.

      Actually, it was 1322. By the New Kingdom, Egypt had complex armor making capabilities. They were in fact distributing chariot armies all over the Senet area on a standardized-width rut road system, something typically attributed to Rome. Egypt had some fairly complex metallurgy practices, and even had rudimentary pit steel-making capabilities, though there were no surface iron deposits nearby for them to really use in the way that the Assyrians did.

      The reason you don't see armor on depictions of Egyptian warfare isn't a technological one in the sense that they didn't know how to make armor, but rather that the climate generally didn't allow for it - Egypt is fucking hot, and people would cook. Tutankhamen and other pharoahs wore armor as a ceremonial and last ditch protective thing (fat lot of good it did him,) and could get away with it because they were being moved in covered, shaded transportation vessels. Even then, several pharoahs are never depicted wearing armor - Seti I and Setnahke being good examples, shown wearing only normal clothes and the lapis crown.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:Armor? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my memory serves me wrong, but I thought that the Egyptians only acquired the ability to work iron after the 18th dynasty. Wasn't the lack of iron technology a major reason for the difficulty the Egyptians had in fighting the Hittites under the Ramessides, in the 19th dynasty?

    4. Re:Armor? by dlasley · · Score: 1

      Amendment time: medical practicioners of Ancient Egypt did have an understanding of the fact that bacteria do not grow well in honey, so it's possible the King would have received timely treatment of a tasty type (ahh, alliteration). It is hard to tell from the resources I read if that understanding or the effectiveness was as extensive as that surrounding moulds (PP).

      No luck yet on the poison angle - looks like it was most commonly administered by drink, and often by members of the religious sects. Gee, whoulda thunk ...

      &laz;

      --
      when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
    5. Re:Armor? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Armor doesn't have to be iron or steel. Leather, or just padded material have also been used. Wood has also been used in armor, as well as a number of other natural materials.
      People didn't wait for the late middle ages (which is where you would have found the classical plated steel armor one usually associates with the term) to seek protection from physical harm.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:Armor? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your memory does serve you wrong. They had pit steel at the time. The bulk of armor in the day was bronze, due largely to availability. And no, it was lack of iron, not lack of iron technology. Doesn't matter if you know how to work it if you don't have much to speak of.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    7. Re:Armor? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I was referring specifically to OP's mention of iron-based technology. I know that the Egyptians had bronze at the time.

    8. Re:Armor? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Ah, interesting. My memory was half-wrong, right about the lack of iron swords etc., but wrong about the reason being technology as opposed to raw material. It must have been rather disconcerting to have your bronze sword broken by your opponent's iron sword.

    9. Re:Armor? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      Armor that covered the knee? This was 1500 BC not AD.
      Actually, it was 1322. By the New Kingdom, Egypt had complex armor making capabilities. They were in fact distributing chariot armies all over the Senet area on a standardized-width rut road system, something typically attributed to Rome. Egypt had some fairly complex metallurgy practices, and even had rudimentary pit steel-making capabilities, though there were no surface iron deposits nearby for them to really use in the way that the Assyrians did. The reason you don't see armor on depictions of Egyptian warfare isn't a technological one in the sense that they didn't know how to make armor, but rather that the climate generally didn't allow for it - Egypt is fucking hot, and people would cook. Tutankhamen and other pharoahs wore armor as a ceremonial and last ditch protective thing (fat lot of good it did him,) and could get away with it because they were being moved in covered, shaded transportation vessels. Even then, several pharoahs are never depicted wearing armor - Seti I and Setnahke being good examples, shown wearing only normal clothes and the lapis crown.
      You sound like you know what your talking about, What the hell are you doing on /.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    10. Re:Armor? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      If you're in a melee fighting for your life and your only weapon breaks I'm not sure you'd find it "disconcerting". I know my emotions would be at a fairly more basic level. Like crapping my pants (or my tunic I guess). ;)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:Armor? by SirBruce · · Score: 1
      Your memory does serve you wrong. They had pit steel at the time. The bulk of armor in the day was bronze, due largely to availability. And no, it was lack of iron, not lack of iron technology. Doesn't matter if you know how to work it if you don't have much to speak of.

      Actually, lack of iron wasn't really important, either. Contrary to popular belief, cold-worked tin bronze is actually SUPERIOR to wrought iron in both hardness and holding an edge. Only when iron making developed carburization, essentially steel, did iron become superior, and that happened after King Tut's death.

      Another theory is that it was actually a lack of ready supplies of tin (perhaps due to the collapse of the Minoan civilization) to make bronze that prompted the switch to iron, despite its inferiorities.

      Bruce

  14. what else can one say.. by b100dian · · Score: 1

    ..than 'break a leg'?

    --
    gtkaml.org
  15. The only thing we don't know... by squoozer · · Score: 1

    Is what he had to breakfast on the third full moon after the winter solstice. How many thousand years has this guy been dead? That's some pretty good detective work.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  16. I am not surprised by seguso · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It am not surprised it was Italian doctors. Thanks to the pressure of Vatican, almost any kind of medical research is now forbidden in Italy, including pre-implant diagnosis. Diagnosing the mummy must have been the only thing left allowed.

    1. Re:I am not surprised by xao+gypsie · · Score: 1

      you sir, are an idiot.....

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  17. I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have gold driven into a wound in the knee?
    Tell me about the nature of this gold. Was it from gold armour? Was the armour pure gold? How thick was it? If the armour was pure thick gold, it isn't likely that it was driven into the knee.
    How about gold leaf on leather armour? The gold goes on the outside making it unlikely to be driven into the knee.
    Another explanation is that the ancients revered gold and thought that it had curative properties. I think it just as likely that the gold was intended as medication.
    I didn't see a reference to a peer reviewed article in tfa. (Maybe I missed it.) My theory is just as good as theirs until someone proves me wrong. I mistrust scientists who publish in the popular press before they publish in peer reviewed journals.

  18. 19? by daivdg · · Score: 4, Informative
    ...1333 B.C., at the age of nine, and reigned until his death in 1325 B.C., aged 19...

    Wouldn't he have been 17 or 18?

    1. Re:19? by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like an editor typo. Wikipedia says his reign began in 1334 BC not 1333 BC.

      --
      Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    2. Re:19? by megrims · · Score: 1

      Because Wikipedia is the most reputable source you can think of?

  19. Nuts by Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny

    First scientists announce they think the Ice Man, Oetzi was infertile. How could they know that? And now they are saying King Tut was killed by a knee infection. Had they not lived two thousand years apart on different continents. They could have hypothesized that King Tut kneed Oetzi in the nuts so hard it sterilized him. Oetzi in an attempt to fend off the blow was holding either an arrowhead or flint knife at just the wrong angle so that it cut King Tut's knee and cut off his testicles at the same time. But solving historical mysteries aren't that easy.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Nuts by lanc · · Score: 1
      ...scientists...
      what sciencists? whoa, important fact, worth to research. Interesting sure. Now, how many millions did that research cost, Safranek?

      --
      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
  20. Why he didn't get it taken care of. by pharwell · · Score: 1

    He probably kept saying, "It's only a flesh wound!"

    --
    I quote others only in order the better to express myself. -- Michel de Montaigne
    1. Re:Why he didn't get it taken care of. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      No. He did the eye-glow and voice thing, and said "Bring me another Tau'ri host body. This one is scratched!"

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Why he didn't get it taken care of. by roseblood · · Score: 1

      He really should have used the sarcaughaphus back on the mothership(okay, you try spelling it)

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  21. That should teach him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Struck on the knee, eh? That should teach King Tut to never go up against Tonya Harding in an ice skating competition!

    1. Re:That should teach him! by LordLucless · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, ice-skating is popular in Egypt I hear.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:That should teach him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make erroneous assumptions about the absence of winter sports in desert countries:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/44916 50.stm

    3. Re:That should teach him! by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Cool, find me a link about the BC equivelant, and I'll concede your point :P

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    4. Re:That should teach him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. That does it. Why is it that everybody gets to post a King Tut joke, but when I, the AC, post a joke, it gets fact-checked! I call BS on that.

      Save the fact-checking mod action for the posts where people are actually claiming something to be true! Slashdot could use more of that.

  22. Hmm... by DnasTheGreat · · Score: 1

    But isn't gold germicidal?

    1. Re:Hmm... by thaWhat · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say germicidal, but I'm pretty sure that it's biologically neutral. Given that it has been used for dental fillings, I would say that the chances are that it isn't poisonous...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a thumb.
    2. Re:Hmm... by belg4mit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Silver is. Gold is largely inert; this is the reason it's used for
      teeth, electrical contacts, etc. Of course it's possible the body
      could still simply recognize it as being foreign and try to fight
      it but it'd just make a lot of puss I think. Undoubtedly something
      else could've entered at the same time.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:Hmm... by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably not, you might be thinking of cis-platin, the anti-cancer drug, which contains platinum (of all things) but it bears as much resemblence to platinum as aspirin does to charcoal.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  23. A bit suprising to me... by coastin · · Score: 1

    due to the ancient Egyptians use of honey as an antibiotic. It is some great forensic work, none the less. I didn't think the head injury was the cause of death, but just looked like an effect of the embalming process. You have to wonder if his mummy had been around to kiss the boo boo and make it better, would he have lived a full life?

    --
    I lost my sig...
    1. Re:A bit suprising to me... by abscissa · · Score: 1

      Honey is not really an antibiotic, it is a preservative, and that is the way the Egyptians used it.

      Due to the extraodinarily high sugar content, no bacteria can grow in honey, and it is, at least in theory, possible to preserve things in honey indefinately. (Obviously air exposure is limited as well.) People have even been mumified in honey.

    2. Re:A bit suprising to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter if it's the queen bee's finest honey or neomycin, 'cuz if you're applying it topically there's no chance of it fending off any serious infection. now if those coptic paramedics had thought of mainlining that honey into tut...

  24. Question by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    I've seen on the same channel a show on Imhotep (they did it to feed off of the publicity of the Mummy movies). They mentioned on the showed that he discovered the use of honey as an antiseptic. So if that's true then the Egyptians had antiseptics, what is the likelihood of Tut dying from an infection like that? Maybe the ancient medicine wasn't powerful enough for a wound like that. If the researchers can see that the gold fragment were decorations of birds, then it must have been noticable. Why did the Egyptian doctors not remove it?

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  25. Re:Obligatory SNL reference by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I thought he was born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia? (Buried with donkey, funky Tut!)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  26. Funky Tut by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Must've sustained the injury during his move from Arizona to Babylonia

  27. Missing history by lifeisgreat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't help but feel disappointed that for every new discovery surrounding Tut, his accomplishments and wealth were insignificant compared to the majority of Egyptian rulers. We'll barely know a fraction of what we could if their tombs were similarly intact.

    Just think of all the history that is gone forever - the Alexandrian library containing most of the world's knowledge up to that point, the slaughter of the Druids, who thanks to not having a system of writing took their people's knowledge rites and history with them to the grave, the Indus civilization which 5,300 years ago developed cities that were more sophisticated than many that Pakistan's and India's people currently live in, where the hell the Basque people came from and why their culture is so distinct from the rest of Europe, the origins of the Sphynx, and heck a lot more. All gone forever.

    1. Re:Missing history by drewxhawaii · · Score: 5, Funny

      this is the single most depressing thing i've read on /.

    2. Re:Missing history by drewxhawaii · · Score: 1
      i did a little research and found this:

      We find in Caesar's Gallic Wars the first and fullest account of the Druids.

      All instruction was communicated orally, but for ordinary purposes, Caesar reports, the Gauls had a written language in which they used the Greek characters.

      No druidic documents have survived. "The principal point of their doctrine", says Caesar, "is that the soul does not die and that after death it passes from one body into another".
    3. Re:Missing history by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      knowledge survives.

      the druids in ireland weren't massacred. when christianity arrived they evolved and while their religious function dwindled their legal standing increased. irish brehon laws survived until around the 16th century in parts of ireland if memory serves me. some of their laws were quite enlightened.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brehon_Laws

      example of knowledge surviving: when newgrange http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newgrange was rediscovered in the 17th century the locals told of the legendary solar temple and were dismissed by the scienists of the day. the locals were right

      the knowledge is out there we just have to sift out the good from the bad.

    4. Re:Missing history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And coming from someone named lifeisgreat just makes it that much more troubling...

    5. Re:Missing history by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 1

      [i]the Alexandrian library containing most of the world's knowledge up to that point,[/i]

      Considering the practices of the day's pedagogues, this probably resulted in the largest loss of pederast erotica to date.

      [i]the slaughter of the Druids, who thanks to not having a system of writing took their people's knowledge rites and history with them to the grave,[/i]

      Iron Age hippies--no loss. They were such an easy beat-down, that the Roman army was done in time to watch Lavrencivs VVelk that evening.

      [i]the Indus civilization which 5,300 years ago developed cities that were more sophisticated than many that Pakistan's and India's people currently live in,[/i]

      More sophisticated than modern Pakistan and India? Once you get everybody to start driving on the same side of the road, you're there.

      [i]where the hell the Basque people came from and why their culture is so distinct from the rest of Europe,[/i]

      And the origin of their centuries-old recipies for C4.

      [i]the origins of the Sphynx[/i]

      Three simple words: Ancient Egyptian FurCon.

  28. A View to a Bling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you see the Tut exhibit in LA? That bling headdress must weigh pounds and with all those edges could definitely be used to beat some unsuspecting Hebrew pyramid-building slave into a bloody pulp.

    1. Re:A View to a Bling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Pharaoh most likely had servants to beat his slaves for him.

  29. Too Much of a Good Thing by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    So Tut went out from a gold overdose? Looks like his whole funerary display is a 3D hieroglyphic epitaph of just that demise.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Too Much of a Good Thing by MrSquishy · · Score: 1

      Indeed, he may have Over Golded

  30. Killed by gold? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Since when is gold toxic?

    Or are they saying King Tut was a Cyberman?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Killed by gold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the heavy metals are poisonous, if enough gets into your system. The main difference between gold and say lead is that lead is easy to disolve in acid, so lead water pipes are.'t a good idea (slightly acid water flowing through can disolve small quantities that can build up in the body of people that drink from that source.

  31. Not without TV and the Internet, etc. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Time moves much more quickly now.

    Without a PSP or Gamecube to wile away the hours, it probably felt like a lifetime!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  32. Nothing to see here. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
    the Discovery Channel is reporting that an Egyptian-led research team claims to have found compelling new evidence relating to the cause of death of King Tutankhamen
    The Discovery Channel has been reporting on new theories of Tutankhamen's death every six months of so for years... Next to sharks it's their biggest infatuation.
  33. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...First we had Achilles heels, and now Tut knees. What's next, Moses' burning bush?

  34. Not that minor by vlad_petric · · Score: 2, Informative
    His rule marked the transition from the "heretic" Atenism (worshiping of the Sun god as the only true god) of his father back to the old ways of the Egyptian religion. For example, his name was originally Tutankhaten (Living Image of Aten) but he changed it to Tutankhammun (Living Image of Ammun), to show that he abandoned the religion of his father [thanks wiki]. Those were really troubled times, so it's quite interesting to know why exactly he died.

    There's many things we don't know, starting with the origin of hommo sapiens. I personally consider historical non-determinism to make the subject much more interesting.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Not that minor by kbahey · · Score: 1
      Atenism (worshiping of the Sun god as the only true god) of his father


      Exactly who Tut's father was is uncertain. It is unlikely that Akhnaten (the Heretic pharoah) was his father.
  35. I'm a tad skeptical about this article by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

    The article claims that, "After Akhenaten's death, a mysterious ruler named Smenkhkare appeared briefly and exited with hardly a trace." However, everything I've ever read on the subject says that Smenkhare was Tutankhamun's older brother, and was co-ruler briefly during their father's reign, but died young. I've never heard of a claim that Smenkhare ruled on his own at any time. I'm not saying that this discredits the report, but that it makes me wonder just how accurate the rest of the historical parts are.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  36. BACTINE by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Had his "mummy" put bactine on it quickly, maybe he wouldn't of had an infection! Ok....you can shoot me now for the reference to "mummy"

  37. No and Yes by Debiant · · Score: 1

    That I wondered also.

    I mean it's true that medicine at average wasn't really advanced.
    But let's however look what was the best level one could get. The level pharaosh and kings had.

    Egyptians mummified their dead, and propably had knowledge of many illnesses. After all they did build pyramids and had allkinds of knowledge of astronomy, so it's not far fetched to think they could known the problems Tutankhamon had with his knee. Certainly he couldn't have been first Eqyptian to be harmed by sword and suffering from a severe knee injury?

    Reading books of history(I do it a lot), kings and rulers of past times did many times have good experts on medicine and seemed to know things many things we know now. Things that never ended to common use in their era. The diffrence between common folk and their rulers in that respect was far bigger than it is today I think.

    Did Tutankhamon refuse to be treated?

    --
    Nobody knows the trouble I've seen, nobody knows has the trouble seen me, even I sometimes wonder why I write these line
    1. Re:No and Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Tutankhamon refuse to be treated?

      i doubt it.

      it's more likely his "loyal servants" didn't want his treatment to work.

  38. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    King Tut ran an early version of linux on his computer.

  39. Answer by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    Getting an infection in a joint like the knee is a Bad Thing, even in today's antibiotic infested world. The nasty little bacteria that were hanging around on the sword suddenly got stuck in a rich, tasty nutrient soup (blood and bone) and started to multiply like gangbusters. Unless the Egyptians knew to open the wound up and clean it out thorougly, the topical "antiseptics" that they had would be of little use. Just like putting an antibiotic cream on a deep wound.

    If Mr. Tut had wandered into a modern ER after some serious sword play he would have had the wound irrigated thoroughly, perhaps in the operating room where it could be opened up and inspected. He then would have been given IV antibiotics. And a large bill.

    So it's not too surprising that a little bit of honey or whatever didn't work out too well for him.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Answer by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Honey has no magical antiseptic powers, either; the key anti-bacterial ingredient is sugar (some bacteria die in an all-sugar environment). Straight sugar works better, and unlike honey, is unlikely to harbour contaminants. Clostridium is sometimes found in honey, and isn't exactly a great thing to get inside a wound.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  40. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most likely, he ran Windows on his kneetop, which became a cause for massive viral, worm, and trojan infections.

    They're still trying to figure what the Trojans were doing there, and it is speculated that they were simply lost.

  41. Another way to look at it ... by willtsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Well, perhaps he was just too rich to eat mouldy bread. Perhaps a peasent stone-mason would have survived the same wound.

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    1. Re:Another way to look at it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mouldy bread? So he gets ergot poisoning and dies insane? Have you heard the theory that the biblical plague that killed off the eldest son of the Egyptians, whilst sparing the Jews, was in fact poisoning from contaminated wheat? Eldest son of an Egyptian family was the one who traditionally opened up the granaries and had the first bread. The Jewish community were not in the same place, and also had a strict religious phobia against mouldy things. End result - Egyptian population ravaged, Jewish population (who promptly assume their god must have done it) untouched. Most of the restrictions against things in the old testament actually make very good sense for bronze age middle easterners...

  42. ScuttleMonkey should have gone with cheaper cable. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    At least in my area on the Basic of the basic cable were you don't get Discovery channel there is national geographic channel which told about this many months ago. I guess Discovery channel just didn't have the time explaining the link between Quantum Physics and Psychics.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  43. Throckmorton's Sign? by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 3, Funny

    "King Tut's left index finger is pointing at his wound."

    Is that sort of like "Throckmorton's Sign"?

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  44. CSI- Egypt by Dabido · · Score: 1

    This week on CSI Egypt, Grishom and the team discover a dead King at a Cairo Museum. At first they believed he was killed by a blow to the back of the head, but further investigation lead them to believe it was a sword to the knee cap.
    Who could have knee capped this young King and will Grishom catch the culprit?

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  45. A bit of background by kbahey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, Tut was a minor figure in Egyptian history, despite his modern fame.

    This fame is due largely to the discovery of his tomb in the early 20th century by Howard Carter. What was unique is that it was about the only tomb of a pharoah to be found intact, i.e. unplundered.

    Tut's era was the New Kingdom last 4 centuries of the second millenium BC), one of three "peaks" in Egypt's ancient history. This same era saw more famous kings such as Ahmose (uniter of Egypt, expelling the foreign Hyksos), Hatshepsut (the female pharoah, who sent ships in the Red Sea and beyond, recording the discoveries on her temple), Thutmosis (the ancient Napoleon, who conquered as far as Mesopotamia, hunting elephants on the Euphrates), Amenhotep (great builder and diplomat), Akhnaten (the Heretic monotheist pharoah), Thutmosis IV (dream stele by the sphinx), Ramses II (2nd longest reign in Egyptian history), Merenptah (his son), and Seti.

    This was the golden age of Egypt, more than a millenium after the pyramids were build. Egypt expanded as never before.

    This was followed by an age of decline when the priests took over, and could not keep the invaders out (Libyans, Nubians, ...etc.).

    During this age, the priests plundered the tombs of previous pharoahs, "confiscating" the tomb wealth to use for current pharoahs and priests. Most of the mummies of royals from the New Kingdom were re-wrapped, and moved to central "caches". Those caches were discovered in the Kings Valley (KV) near Luxor, and the pharoahs identified, unwrapped, and moved to museums. All the treasures in the tombs was long gone (circa 1000 BC).

    This is why a relatively insignificant pharoah like Tut shot to fame. It seems that the priests lost track of where his tomb was, but some robbers have managed to cause minor damage to the external chamber in antiquity. Then Howard Carter came along and discovered the real treasure, and the rest is history.

    One could imagine how the likes of Ramses or Amenhotep were buried ...

    Read more here:

    - New Kingdom on wikipedia

    (Oh, yes, I am Egyptian, that is why ...)

  46. this isnt Medical Times... by goga_russian · · Score: 0

    leave the poor archeology geeks alone. let them dig. they like it.. no need to interrupt their servers. into the pile he goes....

    --
    Dont Judge The situation by the Misfortunate. Goga.
  47. Head injury debunked?? by jccorea · · Score: 1

    However bad the knee injury seems to be on the CT scans seen on the Discovery Channel article, by itself is not a likely cause of death, and an infectious arthritis of the knee is not by itself a guarantee of 100% mortality, even if it has a 100% certainty of leaving a disabling lesion of the knee. The presumed course of events would be a wound of some kind that introduces a foreign body into the joint space, with a corresponding infectious arthritis, and secondary bacterial spread by invasion of the bloodstream. That is very logical, except for the fact that even untreated wounds do not run this course of events in 3 days, average duration of illness would be in the vicinity of 7-10 days in the absence of antibiotic treatment.
    To add to this, the skull X-rays in the same article show an extensive fracture of the (left) occipital bone, which suggest a serious blunt head trauma, more than enough to be the cause of death, as well as a small loose bone fragment that appears to come from the base of the skull (that is consistent with the documented practice of extracting the brain through an opening in the base of the skull via the nose).
    Would be interesting to see the head CT scans....

  48. Re:Obligatory SNL reference by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    Awesome. How I got through the 80s without having seen that, I don't know, but thanks!

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  49. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by thomasxstewart · · Score: 1

    If TUT is missing its' Pee-Pee it probably was regacide. Lucky TUT had mortal wound or TUT would still be alive today. Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.

    --
    WINDOWS XP Service Pack -X- 396 mb. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
  50. Re:Obligatory SNL reference by cuteintern · · Score: 1
    It was actually from the late 70s, during the early years of the show. http://snltranscripts.jt.org/77/77r.phtml/

    Great skit, though.

  51. Re:Obligatory SNL reference by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

    Well, that explains how then--I should have checked the date!

    --
    I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
  52. Tutankhamun vs Tut ? by TheRealDamion · · Score: 1

    I thought there was a famous King Tut and a famous child leader with loads of gold found around his burial chamber called Tutankhamun? Not the same person.

  53. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by novus+ordo · · Score: 1

    Too bad he tried to fix it by kicking it.

    --
    "You're everywhere. You're omnivorous."
  54. Did you read the article by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    Who said anything about unusual? For that matter, who said anything about an arrowhead? Tutankhamen was believed to have died from a blow to the head which led to partial paralysis, hence the walking sticks, but now we found scraps of gold in the knee which look like decorations from armor, suggesting he healed over a wound from presumably a sword which gave way to infection which killed him.
    Come on be honest. I know you didn't. If you can't find the refrence to the arrow well your can't read. http://www.spokesmanreview.com/tools/story_pf.asp? ID=58062 This article actually mentions the walking sticks as being unusually high but then again they were a sign of Egyptian nobility.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  55. Re:Obligatory SNL reference by macdaddy357 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He even had a condo made of stone-a! Here's more about that...

    You know, one of the greatest art exhibits ever to tour the United
    States is the treasures of Tutankamen or King Tut!
    (King Tut) (King Tut)

    Now when he was a young man,
    He'd never thought he'd see,
    (King Tut)
    People stand in line,
    To see the boy king.
    (King Tut)
    How'd you get so funky?
    (Funky Tut)
    They said you do the monkey.
    (Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia, King Tut)
    (King Tut)
    Now if I'd known,
    They'd line up just to see him,
    (King Tut)
    I'd've taken all my money,
    And bought me a museum.
    (King Tut)
    Buried with a donkey,
    (Funky Tut) He's my favorite honkey.
    (Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia, King Tut)
    Dancing by the Nile,
    (Disco dancing)
    The ladies love his style.
    (Fox Tut)
    Rockin' for a mile,
    (Rockin' Tut)
    He ate a crocodile.
    He gave his life for tourism.
    (King Tut)
    (Tut, tut. Tut, tut . . .)
    Golden idols!
    He's an Egyptian!
    They're selling you.
    (King Tut)
    Now when I die,
    Now don't think I'm a nut.
    (King Tut)
    Don't want no fancy funeral,
    Just one like old King Tut.
    (King Tut)
    He could'a won a Grammy,
    (King Tut)
    Buried in his 'jamies.
    (Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia, he was born in Arizona)
    He's got a condo made of stone-a. . .
    (King Tut)

    --
    How ya like dat?
  56. No. Hands crossed pointing at W & S on compas by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    No. The hands were crossed over his chest. Clearly he was pointing at the W and the S on the compass dial... so obviously, Waylon Smithers did it. On the other hand, the way that the Egyptians orient a sarcophagus would mean that, from the Tut's point of view, the "W" would've appeared as an "M", so then it must've been Maggie Simpson ;)

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  57. gold finger by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Ok, maybe not gold fever, but had 007 been involved, maybe he would have developed Goldfinger?

  58. re: obvious by piaqt · · Score: 1

    ...making Tut the first Darwin Award winner.

    --
    --piaqt
  59. The most qualified doctors. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    Note that the doctors saying it was a wound to the knee were Italian. Ba-da-bing!

    I mean, who else would be experts in the field of knee trauma? :D

    (I'm Italian, btw, and proud of it)

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  60. Obviously you forget that there was no "year zero" by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Therefore everything took one year longer in the BC. Two events that were a day apart at the time now appear to be one year and one day apart. For example, babies used to gestate for 21 months.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  61. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by thomasxstewart · · Score: 1

    Oh BTW, TUT was real oinker, TUT was queer. (or BI- something)? Why does that seem so long ago? Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.

    --
    WINDOWS XP Service Pack -X- 396 mb. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
  62. Re:what has king tut got to do with slashdot? by thomasxstewart · · Score: 1

    Oh, yeah. That King TUT. Now I remember. TUT was injured all right, was stuck in knee cap, instead of being captured, TUT requested head smashed in, It took few days to negoiate return of body (fight into & retrieve), so infection had set into knee, as that wound was bit older than brain smash, way enemy left it when overpowered.Signed:HRM PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.

    --
    WINDOWS XP Service Pack -X- 396 mb. http://www.geocities.com/tsvondrashekmd/WASHINGTON .html
  63. Oh Tanya Where Art Thou? by blastard · · Score: 1

    And where was Tanya Harding during all of this?

  64. One question by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 1

    What's a Nubian?

    --
    I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    1. Re:One question by kbahey · · Score: 1

      Nubian means from Nubia. Nubia is the land historically between Egypt, which was considered to end at the first cataract on the Nile (waterfall making the river not navigable south of it), and the North part of what is now Sudan.

      The kingdom of Napata eventually took over Egypt, and their kings became pharoahs. Their center was at Meroe, where there are pyramids today. The most famous "black pharoah" was Taharqa.

      Read more here http://touregypt.net/historicalessays/nubia.htm, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nubia, and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-fifth_dynasty_ of_Egypt.

      Outside of the Star Wars mythos of course ...