I wasn't looking for a ticky tack discussion. I was looking for substance to your claims. I'm satisfied that the one example you thought of was a big "meh" to me.
If you have a secret attending Neo-Nazi rallies and your friends and family find out you might well be disowned and disinherited.
Always with the "Nazi". What this translates to is: if you have political opinions that differ with mine, I'll call you a neo-Nazi and use that to justify my discrimination against you. By the way, communists killed far more than the Nazis ever did, but McCarthyism is looked upon as some black mark in history.
For example, he talked about how he generally interrupts other people because he can tell what they're going to say, what he has to say is more important, and he doesn't want to waste his time listening to them.
"Women have made an issue of the fact that men talk over women in meetings. In my experience, that's true. But for full context, I interrupt anyone who talks too long without adding enough value. If most of my victims turn out to be women, I am still assumed to be the problem in this situation, not the talkers. The alternative interpretation of the situation -- that women are more verbal than men -- is never discussed as a contributing factor to interruptions. Can you imagine a situation where -- on average -- the people who talk the most do NOT get interrupted the most? I don't know if the amount of talking each person does is related to the amount of interrupting they experience, or if there is a gender difference to it, but it seems like a reasonable hypothesis. My point is that men are assumed guilty in this country. We don't even explore their alibis. (And watch the reaction to even bringing up the topic.)"
There are plenty of humans who sit around for hours every day and do nothing. We call them prisoners.
I thought we called them NEETs. Prisoners spend 24/7 locked up, not 4 hours of "work" to receive benefits.
I'd rather see UBI become a catalyst for human creativity rather than a means to a dead-end with that workfarce concept of yours.
Ooh, is FOUR HOURS to have your basic needs met too much for people? Assuming 8 hours of sleep, that leaves TWELVE HOURS to be as "creative" as you want.
T's jokes were not about killing persons of a profession, it was about killing Hillary, an individual, egging on a cheering crowd (of nuts of your caliber).
And they were still incomparable to years worth of "hey guys, I like to fuck children!" "jokes". But you're a scumbag who insists it's all the same.
Why only consider ONE sin? He joked about shooting Hillary twice. Are murder jokes less sinful than pedo jokes? Fox Sin Math?
Why do I have to explain to you that children are the most vulnerable people in our society, and that abuse against them is particularly heinous? Why do you pretend that all sins are created equal?
Then I'll bring up Catholic Church and Boy Scouts of America.
Are the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts of America Republican? Oh, they aren't. Do republicans defend pedophilia within those institutions? Oh, they don't.
Your last sentence makes no sense.
I'm sorry you're too stupid to read beyond a 5th grade level. Here, let me break it down for you: It's not "PC" to be against fucking kids, phony "jokes" or otherwise.
If one pits the entirety of T's shameful statements against him, not just about his daughters, seems about EVEN to me. They both say very offensive crap.
Then why don't you do it? Nothing Trump did amounts to "joking", over and over again, about how he likes to rape kids. That's why you don't.
Dennis Hastert and his GOP Hush Buddies must be part of that.
Oh, speaking of Hastert. Guess who he was friends with? The Podestas. Guess what kind of art Tony Podesta likes to keep in his home?
I didn't say he wasn't a scumbag. You are putting words in my mouth.
I said you were a scumbag for equating being against the normalization of pedophilia and not buying the "just jokes!" when a man repeatedly "jokes" about how he likes to rape kids in Pedowood as "PC".
I personally find T's statements about his daughters similarly disturbing. Perhaps you judge it differently, so be it.
Why don't you don't write them down side-by-side for comparison, then?
Further, there's no evidence Disney knew about Gunn's worse tweets. You can fault Disney for not vetting well, but that's a different "sin". You don't appear to be thinking this through.
You aren't thinking it through. People like James Gunn don't occur in a vacuum. There's a culture in Pedowood.
So now PC is back? Looks like hypocrisy to me.
You're equating being against the normalization of pedophilia and not buying the "just jokes!" when a man repeatedly "jokes" about how he likes to rape kids in Pedowood as "PC"? Looks like you're a scumbag to me.
T has made similar statements and gestures regarding his own daughters.
Oh, so he said stuff like this?
"RT @peteralton I like it when little boys touch me in my silly place. Shhh!"
""Eagle Snatches Kid" is what I call it when I get lucky."
"Huston Huddleston posted this video on my Facebook page with the note "I thought you'd appreciate this." My response: "Appreciate it?!! I just came all over my face!!""
(Huston Huddleston was convicted of child pornography charges.)
They didn't address illegal immigration in that video
Well, they did. They just never come out and say, "We're pro illegal immigration!" Instead, they sneer and simper about walls and "xenophobia".
nor balkanization
That's the point. They ignore the downsides of mass migration, foreign cultures, and lax enforcement of illegal immigration.
You are full of stuff. Fox and Rush take a few loonies and paint them as representatives.
Oh really? Then why did so many come out in support of James Gunn? Is it "just jokes"? Why does this excuse never fly if the joke has a hint of racism by somebody on the right? Also, James Gunn was not a comedian. And his "jokes" amounted to, "Hey guys, I like to fuck kids!" over and over again. Strange that Disney would give him a premium job after that. It's almost like pedo signaling is considered a virtue in Hollywood.
Why do we get articles by Vice singing the virtues of a convicted pedophile as a fighter of neo-Nazis in prison?
Why is creepy Joe Biden still in good standing within the Democrat party?
And we haven't forgotten the series of articles put out by Salon.
Do you believe your own bullshit? What would the media reaction have been if this was the reverse, where all these Google executives were having a big cry and cope session with the entire company after Clinton got elected?
This sort of thing happened at many companies, there are indeed employees concerned about their immigration status, if their green card was going to get revoked.
Trump campaigned against illegal immigration. It's a bunch of phony hysteria that Trump was going to round up every immigrant here legally. Then again, how many people are working here illegally? That's the real story.
Oh, and to say it isn't political, there's another story about Google that the gatekeepers at Slashdot hid. Google explicitly had a project to drive voting by Latino voters, as shown by email that was recently leaked. There's some mumbling excuses about being non-partisan, but there's damning quotes to the contrary when they find out their efforts didn't stop Trump from being elected.
T is a rude arrogant narcissist (among other things) to a degree that overwhelms his party affiliation. Why the hell should anyone expect people to be happy about such as a President?
I dunno, how about the 46% that voted for him? The Google video is just a reflection of the hyperpartisan politics that infects snooty and elite institutions like Google.
They think it's just fine that people are living in tents on the sidewalks in Los Angeles while advocating for illegal immigration. That America should be the dumping ground for the entire world.
They think it's fine that American schools are struggling with an influx of illegal immigrants that don't speak English and need special attention.
They think it's fine that American emergency rooms are flooded with illegal immigrants getting basic health care needs met.
They think it's fine that America is becoming balkanized along racial lines. That illegal immigrants here walk on the American flag, while waving the flags of their home countries. That they chant, "Make America Mexico Again."
The "progressive" left are the party of illegal immigration, transgender bathroom "rights", and the normalization of pedophilia.
But I give more weight to the offence felt by the descendants of slaves
Can you demonstrate that the "descendants of slaves" actually give a shit? Because usually it's some neon-haired busy-body that's offended on their behalf.
I never said it was secure. I said XP and the outdates browsers that run on it are trivially insecure with known exploits.
It's not my job to educate you
But it is your job to substantiate your claims. What is claimed without evidence can be dismissed. If it was easy to secure then we wouldn't need to pay a super "genius" like you for consultation. We'd just look up the recipe online and do it.
So, in his own state, with all the records at his disposal because he was in charge of running the elections, as Secretary of State, he came up with one case of voter fraud?
Kansas enacted a law to require proof of citizenship years ago, though it's been held up in courts. Earlier cases could not be charged due to statue of limitations. They also had no means to check federal immigration status -- they basically stumbled across these cases when they became naturalized citizens.
But even with the heads-up scrutiny, in a low-immigration state, he still got a conviction. Now imagine the kind of shenanigans that are going on in California, which is an official "sanctuary" state.
Now let's see you get to the "three million" that Trump claims cost him the popular vote.
I don't care if Trump was cost the popular vote or not, as it has no legal standing on the election. What I do care about is a concentrated effort to stymie enforcement of our immigration laws and voter integrity. Many local and state elections have been won on razor-thin margins.
If you read your link, you will notice that Kris Kobach, who is anything but a neutral observer, offers ZERO EVIDENCE that these things happened, but assures us that they did.
You mean like the conviction he got? From the link:
"Victor Garcia Bebek pleaded guilty to voter fraud in April for voting three times between 2012 and 2014.
Bebek became a naturalized citizen in early 2017, and it was then that election officials discovered he had previously voted."
And this is in Kansas, and only found because he registered to vote after becoming naturalized and he was already registered. Imagine if they seriously looked for cases of illegal immigrants voting in California. Of course, they would never do that, as it's a "sanctuary" state.
"Another 34 were identified by the Sedgwick County Election Office when staff attended naturalization ceremonies to register new citizens and discovered some were already registered."
"In 2015, one Kansas county began offering voter registration at naturalization ceremonies, as Hans A. von Spakovsky and I reported in January at Fox News. Election officials soon discovered about a dozen new Americans who were already registered -- and who had voted as non-citizens in multiple elections."
Slashdot Mirror
You tacitly admitted defeat when you mentioned Nazis, you goofball.
I wasn't looking for a ticky tack discussion. I was looking for substance to your claims. I'm satisfied that the one example you thought of was a big "meh" to me.
If you have a secret attending Neo-Nazi rallies and your friends and family find out you might well be disowned and disinherited.
Always with the "Nazi". What this translates to is: if you have political opinions that differ with mine, I'll call you a neo-Nazi and use that to justify my discrimination against you. By the way, communists killed far more than the Nazis ever did, but McCarthyism is looked upon as some black mark in history.
For example, he talked about how he generally interrupts other people because he can tell what they're going to say, what he has to say is more important, and he doesn't want to waste his time listening to them.
Presumably you're talking about this then?
"Women have made an issue of the fact that men talk over women in meetings. In my experience, that's true. But for full context, I interrupt anyone who talks too long without adding enough value. If most of my victims turn out to be women, I am still assumed to be the problem in this situation, not the talkers. The alternative interpretation of the situation -- that women are more verbal than men -- is never discussed as a contributing factor to interruptions. Can you imagine a situation where -- on average -- the people who talk the most do NOT get interrupted the most? I don't know if the amount of talking each person does is related to the amount of interrupting they experience, or if there is a gender difference to it, but it seems like a reasonable hypothesis. My point is that men are assumed guilty in this country. We don't even explore their alibis. (And watch the reaction to even bringing up the topic.)"
You misrepresented him.
I used to read his blog but I stopped when it became apparent that he is a really unpleasant person.
What was really unpleasant about him? Could you cite some examples?
There are plenty of humans who sit around for hours every day and do nothing. We call them prisoners.
I thought we called them NEETs. Prisoners spend 24/7 locked up, not 4 hours of "work" to receive benefits.
I'd rather see UBI become a catalyst for human creativity rather than a means to a dead-end with that workfarce concept of yours.
Ooh, is FOUR HOURS to have your basic needs met too much for people? Assuming 8 hours of sleep, that leaves TWELVE HOURS to be as "creative" as you want.
Show me on the Dilbert doll where he touched you...
I agree with you. UBI is a disaster waiting to happen. I believe in workfare, even if it involves sitting in a "work" room for 4 hours a day.
T's jokes were not about killing persons of a profession, it was about killing Hillary, an individual, egging on a cheering crowd (of nuts of your caliber).
And they were still incomparable to years worth of "hey guys, I like to fuck children!" "jokes". But you're a scumbag who insists it's all the same.
So you are claiming murder is a less serious crime than pedophilia? Where's your scoring chart?
Why do I have to explain to you how repulsively heinous to you child molestation is? We have jokes about killing lawyers going back to Shakespeare.
I know why I have to explain. Because you're a scumbag.
Why only consider ONE sin? He joked about shooting Hillary twice. Are murder jokes less sinful than pedo jokes? Fox Sin Math?
Why do I have to explain to you that children are the most vulnerable people in our society, and that abuse against them is particularly heinous? Why do you pretend that all sins are created equal?
Then I'll bring up Catholic Church and Boy Scouts of America.
Are the Catholic Church and the Boy Scouts of America Republican? Oh, they aren't. Do republicans defend pedophilia within those institutions? Oh, they don't.
Your last sentence makes no sense.
I'm sorry you're too stupid to read beyond a 5th grade level. Here, let me break it down for you: It's not "PC" to be against fucking kids, phony "jokes" or otherwise.
If one pits the entirety of T's shameful statements against him, not just about his daughters, seems about EVEN to me. They both say very offensive crap.
Then why don't you do it? Nothing Trump did amounts to "joking", over and over again, about how he likes to rape kids. That's why you don't.
Dennis Hastert and his GOP Hush Buddies must be part of that.
Oh, speaking of Hastert. Guess who he was friends with? The Podestas. Guess what kind of art Tony Podesta likes to keep in his home?
I didn't say he wasn't a scumbag. You are putting words in my mouth.
I said you were a scumbag for equating being against the normalization of pedophilia and not buying the "just jokes!" when a man repeatedly "jokes" about how he likes to rape kids in Pedowood as "PC".
I personally find T's statements about his daughters similarly disturbing. Perhaps you judge it differently, so be it.
Why don't you don't write them down side-by-side for comparison, then?
Further, there's no evidence Disney knew about Gunn's worse tweets. You can fault Disney for not vetting well, but that's a different "sin". You don't appear to be thinking this through.
You aren't thinking it through. People like James Gunn don't occur in a vacuum. There's a culture in Pedowood.
So now PC is back? Looks like hypocrisy to me.
You're equating being against the normalization of pedophilia and not buying the "just jokes!" when a man repeatedly "jokes" about how he likes to rape kids in Pedowood as "PC"? Looks like you're a scumbag to me.
T has made similar statements and gestures regarding his own daughters.
Oh, so he said stuff like this?
"RT @peteralton I like it when little boys touch me in my silly place. Shhh!"
""Eagle Snatches Kid" is what I call it when I get lucky."
"Huston Huddleston posted this video on my Facebook page with the note "I thought you'd appreciate this." My response: "Appreciate it?!! I just came all over my face!!""
(Huston Huddleston was convicted of child pornography charges.)
I caught you. Cure your bias and shape up.
Yeah, sure you did, buddy. Look in the mirror.
They didn't address illegal immigration in that video
Well, they did. They just never come out and say, "We're pro illegal immigration!" Instead, they sneer and simper about walls and "xenophobia".
nor balkanization
That's the point. They ignore the downsides of mass migration, foreign cultures, and lax enforcement of illegal immigration.
You are full of stuff. Fox and Rush take a few loonies and paint them as representatives.
Oh really? Then why did so many come out in support of James Gunn? Is it "just jokes"? Why does this excuse never fly if the joke has a hint of racism by somebody on the right? Also, James Gunn was not a comedian. And his "jokes" amounted to, "Hey guys, I like to fuck kids!" over and over again. Strange that Disney would give him a premium job after that. It's almost like pedo signaling is considered a virtue in Hollywood.
Why do we get articles by Vice singing the virtues of a convicted pedophile as a fighter of neo-Nazis in prison?
Why is creepy Joe Biden still in good standing within the Democrat party?
And we haven't forgotten the series of articles put out by Salon.
And this really wasn't that political.
Do you believe your own bullshit? What would the media reaction have been if this was the reverse, where all these Google executives were having a big cry and cope session with the entire company after Clinton got elected?
This sort of thing happened at many companies, there are indeed employees concerned about their immigration status, if their green card was going to get revoked.
Trump campaigned against illegal immigration. It's a bunch of phony hysteria that Trump was going to round up every immigrant here legally. Then again, how many people are working here illegally? That's the real story.
Oh, and to say it isn't political, there's another story about Google that the gatekeepers at Slashdot hid. Google explicitly had a project to drive voting by Latino voters, as shown by email that was recently leaked. There's some mumbling excuses about being non-partisan, but there's damning quotes to the contrary when they find out their efforts didn't stop Trump from being elected.
T is a rude arrogant narcissist (among other things) to a degree that overwhelms his party affiliation. Why the hell should anyone expect people to be happy about such as a President?
I dunno, how about the 46% that voted for him? The Google video is just a reflection of the hyperpartisan politics that infects snooty and elite institutions like Google.
They think it's just fine that people are living in tents on the sidewalks in Los Angeles while advocating for illegal immigration. That America should be the dumping ground for the entire world.
They think it's fine that American schools are struggling with an influx of illegal immigrants that don't speak English and need special attention.
They think it's fine that American emergency rooms are flooded with illegal immigrants getting basic health care needs met.
They think it's fine that America is becoming balkanized along racial lines. That illegal immigrants here walk on the American flag, while waving the flags of their home countries. That they chant, "Make America Mexico Again."
The "progressive" left are the party of illegal immigration, transgender bathroom "rights", and the normalization of pedophilia.
But I give more weight to the offence felt by the descendants of slaves
Can you demonstrate that the "descendants of slaves" actually give a shit? Because usually it's some neon-haired busy-body that's offended on their behalf.
Says the child who thinks Windows 10 is secure.
I never said it was secure. I said XP and the outdates browsers that run on it are trivially insecure with known exploits.
It's not my job to educate you
But it is your job to substantiate your claims. What is claimed without evidence can be dismissed. If it was easy to secure then we wouldn't need to pay a super "genius" like you for consultation. We'd just look up the recipe online and do it.
Better known exploits than unknown ones like on your "agile", trial-and-error, end-user beta test pile of shit.
You're legit retarded.
Yep, it's easy. You're just a noob who doesn't know how to use a computer.
Then describe your secure setup. Making claims without evidence is meaningless.
So, in his own state, with all the records at his disposal because he was in charge of running the elections, as Secretary of State, he came up with one case of voter fraud?
Kansas enacted a law to require proof of citizenship years ago, though it's been held up in courts. Earlier cases could not be charged due to statue of limitations. They also had no means to check federal immigration status -- they basically stumbled across these cases when they became naturalized citizens.
But even with the heads-up scrutiny, in a low-immigration state, he still got a conviction. Now imagine the kind of shenanigans that are going on in California, which is an official "sanctuary" state.
Now let's see you get to the "three million" that Trump claims cost him the popular vote.
I don't care if Trump was cost the popular vote or not, as it has no legal standing on the election. What I do care about is a concentrated effort to stymie enforcement of our immigration laws and voter integrity. Many local and state elections have been won on razor-thin margins.
I would hate to see the state of your computer if you think that updates are some magic bullet that keeps shit secure.
I guarantee you it's better off than a system running with known exploits.
It's also pretty easy to secure any system, regardless of how old it may be.
No it isn't.
If you read your link, you will notice that Kris Kobach, who is anything but a neutral observer, offers ZERO EVIDENCE that these things happened, but assures us that they did.
You mean like the conviction he got? From the link:
"Victor Garcia Bebek pleaded guilty to voter fraud in April for voting three times between 2012 and 2014.
Bebek became a naturalized citizen in early 2017, and it was then that election officials discovered he had previously voted."
And this is in Kansas, and only found because he registered to vote after becoming naturalized and he was already registered. Imagine if they seriously looked for cases of illegal immigrants voting in California. Of course, they would never do that, as it's a "sanctuary" state.
I already did, elsewhere in this thread.
Then link to it.
You'll notice that he doesn't offer any citation or evidence for this anecdote. Just that it happened.
https://www.kansas.com/news/po...
"Another 34 were identified by the Sedgwick County Election Office when staff attended naturalization ceremonies to register new citizens and discovered some were already registered."
That National Review op-ed you linked to has been debunked many times over.
Good, then it should be easy for you to reference such a debunking for the part I quoted.
It points to the fact that there are registered voters who either a) don't vote, b) have died, or c) have moved.
Oh, I see. You refuse to read. Here it is again:
"In 2015, one Kansas county began offering voter registration at naturalization ceremonies, as Hans A. von Spakovsky and I reported in January at Fox News. Election officials soon discovered about a dozen new Americans who were already registered -- and who had voted as non-citizens in multiple elections."