People pay for access to the internet, much in the way they pay for cable. If you do not want anything obscene in your household, dont pay for it to enter your domain.
i think this is an argument in response to the news a couple of weeks ago about google and internet companies complaing and threatining litigation against big Telcos over the use of access pipes to homes for verizon TV services (a bandwidth hog) and not leaving enough bandwidth for other data traffic(i.e. internet). So my point is, nothing is going to happen, its just a little bickering amongst bed fellows(neither would be as profitable without the other)
stated that the local incumbant(in this case Verizon) is obligated to sell its network resources (bandwidth and local access) to any competing company at wholesale. My only issue with the use ( or misuse) of bandwidth would not necesarlly be for lack of available bandwidth to consumers, but the possibility of hindering local competition.
I remember reading that the next gen nintendo system will have access to their old NES games for download from a nintendo service. Would it be a far strecth for PS1 games to be available for download to the PS3? with the advent of fiber to the curve and higher capacity HDs, i think this would be a great differentiator between te 360 and the PS3.
....Blue-Ray Killer
Im particularly concerned about the possible mutation of the cell to survive and thrive in human organisms...prognosis negative
I went to high school with a couple of people that went on to become police officers...lets just say they werent brightest bunch
kinda like this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_snatchers
buy dell
why would crippling the quality help DRM?
People pay for access to the internet, much in the way they pay for cable. If you do not want anything obscene in your household, dont pay for it to enter your domain.
i think this is an argument in response to the news a couple of weeks ago about google and internet companies complaing and threatining litigation against big Telcos over the use of access pipes to homes for verizon TV services (a bandwidth hog) and not leaving enough bandwidth for other data traffic(i.e. internet). So my point is, nothing is going to happen, its just a little bickering amongst bed fellows(neither would be as profitable without the other)
stated that the local incumbant(in this case Verizon) is obligated to sell its network resources (bandwidth and local access) to any competing company at wholesale. My only issue with the use ( or misuse) of bandwidth would not necesarlly be for lack of available bandwidth to consumers, but the possibility of hindering local competition.
I remember reading that the next gen nintendo system will have access to their old NES games for download from a nintendo service. Would it be a far strecth for PS1 games to be available for download to the PS3? with the advent of fiber to the curve and higher capacity HDs, i think this would be a great differentiator between te 360 and the PS3.