Slashdot Mirror


User: c6gunner

c6gunner's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8,911
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8,911

  1. Re:$130mil? Wowzers~ on US Funding Five Game-Changing Energy Projects · · Score: 0

    I agree - you don't need a new car, so the US obviously doesn't need a military. Please disband it. We promise to protect your borders for you.

        - Sincerely, Canada

  2. Re:Good, but there is always an issue on US Funding Five Game-Changing Energy Projects · · Score: 1

    Why be informed when you can blindly follow what your preacher/McCarthy told you in the morning about the evil Russian empire and its love for unicorn blood.

    Funny :) As a centirist, atheist, Canadian citizen originally born into a communist nation, I can honestly say that the willful pig-headed ignorance of the Tea Party is only eclipsed by individuals such as yourself.

  3. Re:$130mil? Wowzers~ on US Funding Five Game-Changing Energy Projects · · Score: 1

    If we can spend over $600 billion per year on the military, surely we have a couple of billion per year to develop the energy sources we're going to need this century.

    Yeah, and if you can afford to spend $20,000 a year on rent, utilities, and food, you can afford to give me $5,000 so I can do ... stuff.

  4. Re:Good, but there is always an issue on US Funding Five Game-Changing Energy Projects · · Score: 1

    Amen! Preach it brother! Down with Palin; vote for Stalin!

  5. Re:You free speech defenders on Japanese Government Will Censor Fukushima "Illegal Information" · · Score: 1

    Thanks for demonstrating the ease with which a fool can be separated from his money.

  6. Re:You free speech defenders on Japanese Government Will Censor Fukushima "Illegal Information" · · Score: 3, Funny

    Personally, I wouldn't be waiting for the government to tell me to move far, far away from a nuclear disaster site.

    Personally, I welcome the opportunity to buy you house for 1/4th the pre-disaster market value.

    It's a win-win situation!

  7. Re:Wowza on Mars Orbiter Finds Buried Dry Ice Lake · · Score: 1, Funny

    See, this is why the human race is doomed

    No, this is why the human race is FUCKING AWESOME!!!!

  8. Re:Who cares, I'm enlisting NOW! on USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator · · Score: 1

    I forgive you.

    Here, have a quarter.

  9. Re:Who cares, I'm enlisting NOW! on USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator · · Score: 0

    You are simply adorable, trying to insult me by implying that I am unemployed.

    I did no such thing - I'm simply asking you to go do your "work" on a different car.

  10. Re:Ugh the F-35... on USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator · · Score: 1

    Last I heard it was going to be more expensive than the F-22.

    A source would be nice. Even the most pessimistic estimates I've seen still put it at less than half the price of the F-22.

  11. Re:Who cares, I'm enlisting NOW! on USAF Gets F-35 Flight Simulator · · Score: 2, Funny

    I totally do not work for Lockheed Martin and have no interest in promoting their excellent products...

    Obviously. Now put away that squeegee - I already told you my windshield is fine.

  12. Re:Just say on Michigan Police Could Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops · · Score: 1

    Sprechen Sie English?

  13. Re:Physics on Instant Quantum Communication Is Near · · Score: 2

    It wasn't my cat, but Schrödinger might be a bit miffed since he preferred it both alive and dead at the same time.

    That's just something he came up with so he wouldn't have to explain death to his kids.

    "Daddy, what's wrong with Mr. Whiskers?"
    "Well, see, if we put him in this box ..."

  14. Re:HU? on Instant Quantum Communication Is Near · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the kind of comment that gets you slapped with a trout.

  15. Re:Just say on Michigan Police Could Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops · · Score: 1

    The phrase implies the existence of a time when things were better. You don't go around saying "what a sad time we live in, when only 90% of us can have broadband access". It would be retarded. So no, assuming that he meant what he wrote is not "non sequitur at best" - it's common fucking sense. Whereas being a silly pedant is useless, at best.

  16. Re:Just say on Michigan Police Could Search Cell Phones During Traffic Stops · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's some sad times we live in that such a concern would ever cross the minds of a regular citizen who is not a career criminal.

    Right; because innocent people never got hung back in the good ol' days.

    What planet are you living on, anyway?

  17. Re:The Planet Will Be Fine on Skynet Becomes Aware, Launches Nuclear Attack · · Score: 1

    The 6 billion or so half-evolved pink monkeys currently infesting it might not fare so well, but the planet will recover once they die off. We. I mean... "we"... die off. Yeah.

    Meh. It wouldn't be the end of our species either. Even if we lose 5 billion to thirst and starvation, the remaining 1 billion will be just fine. No, momma nature can't kill us off at this point - if we go, it will either be death-from-the-skies, or thermonuclear warfare.

  18. Re:River Tam on Skynet Becomes Aware, Launches Nuclear Attack · · Score: 1

    Robot Chicken had it right. If someone like that showed up to protect me, fighting Terminators would most definitely not be her primary job.

    Yeah, an awkward sociopath hovering halfway between completely emotionless and typical-emo, with a face the looks like it caught fire and was put out with rusty chains. I could think of lots of other uses for her. Scarecrow. Halloween decoration. Chase-those-damn-kids-off-my-yard tool ...

  19. Re:Deja Vu on Skynet Becomes Aware, Launches Nuclear Attack · · Score: 1

    ... but didn't think there would be this social need for a low uid until later ...

    Seems like a silly trend. Honestly, I've never understood why anyone would want to advertise being senile ....

  20. Re:This is not the logic you are looking for on Is Sugar Toxic? · · Score: 1

    +1 Completely-missing-the-point award. Double nice.

  21. Re:Just ask the Romans on Is Sugar Toxic? · · Score: 1

    *facepalm*

    Hey, people used to decorate plates with uranium, so all your plates are probably bad. Better toss 'em out.

  22. Re:Yes, it's toxic... on Is Sugar Toxic? · · Score: 1

    I think he may have been joking. But I'm not certain enough to give you the ol' "WHOOSH".

  23. Re:Scientific American throws in the towel on What Happened To the Climate Refugees? · · Score: 1

    I resent the presumption that asking for alternative points of view puts you on the lunatic fringe.

    Yeah, all lunatics say that.

  24. Re:Seriously... on Judge Rules That Police Can Bar High I.Q. Scores · · Score: 1

    No. If you take a test and score too low, you get rejected, so we've already established that you're allowed to discriminate by IQ / intelligence. If you're saying that it's discriminatory to disqualify people who score too high, then you can't justify disqualifying people who score too low, either.

  25. Re:"manned moon landing" on China Aims To Build World's Largest Rocket · · Score: 1

    The Earth nutters just bitch and complain about nothing.