I interpreted the original post as claiming Russia will slap a new facade on OSS and claim they "made it" without giving OSS credit. It may not be a dig against Russian programmers, but against Russian politicians who lie, or perhaps politicians in general, who, as we all well know in the USA, often take credit for what's not theirs and blame others for what is theirs. It's not just a Russian thing.
can't we at least agree to outlaw imperial measurements for anything to do with space?
Screw your commie system, God save the Queen!
10 is a dumb base anyhow, not divisible by 3 or 4. The first tetrapods who crawled onto land had mathematically defective digits. They should have been BBQ'd and placed between bread instead.
To simulate the human body as best they could, they made an artificial human kidney model out of clear silicone gel and loaded it up with real human kidney stones...
Don't be surprised when actual patients pass spherical cows.
It's possible this Jesus person did go around preaching and claiming miracles, but others magnified and decorated the stories using existing legends. Thus, being a "composite" tale does not automatically de-existify Jesus (for lack of a better word).
I've had a kidney stone, and I'll tell you the LAST thing I wanted to do during all that pain was hop on a roller coaster. I didn't want to move, period, even after bigass pain meds.
It was the most painful thing I ever felt. I invented several new vowels and cuss-words, some Klingon, and repented to every deity I could think of. (Its effects vary per person and per stone, though.)
Back in the old days they did all kinds of kludgey things to save bytes and/or processing time. These days we usually view such tricks as maintenance, dependency, and security risks because the hardware is cheap enough.
(Except we use web browsers to try to act like desktop GUI's, so I guess wacky kludges never die, just morph.)
The problem with the browser is that HTML browsers were not originally designed to act like and/or mirror desktop-style GUI's. However, that's exactly what the industry has been trying to do for the past 2 decades, and badly. Even the big vendors F up their UI's.
If a browser were designed UP FRONT to be GUI-oriented, then browsers wouldn't need to download giant GUI JS libraries to try to mirror real GUI's. It's almost like every app downloading an OS to run. Dumb! Illogical! Bad humans!
One of my common suggestions is to make the (GUI) browser be a "dumb" vector plotter: plot shapes and input boxes based on simple linear coordinates. The flow and relative placement control would be done on the server side. This would greatly simplify the client and related standards.
That way you have only ONE layout/flow engine instead of 50-ish you have to test for on the client (Mac, Windows, iPhone, Android, times each version X, version Y, etc. etc.) Fonts would be a little trickier, but I've kicked around various solutions for those that would take a while to describe here.
I'm tired of UI's breaking and overlapping wrong in different ways on different browsers/devices. I'd rather have the 90's DLL Hell back instead of this insidious Render Hell.
Lets do it logically this time. First, we have to admit we fucked up really bad and turned UI's into rocket science. Actually, rocket science is easier: it follows physics, while the HTML stack follows Chaos Theory. It's great job security until you count your grey hairs and Tums.
The problem with anything in JS + DOM is that version n + x of the browser comes out and the app stops working right.
We try to force a browser to act like a desktop GUI, and it often backfires because it was not designed to be a full desktop-like GUI, and our stack of kludges eventually bytes us in the ass.
People, we are doing network UI's wrong. Time for a new standard. JS+Dom keeps sucking rotting eggs over and over in different combinations of suckativity.
That's not true, as other replies demonstrate, but even if it were true, it's not evidence of super-natural backing.
Evidence of existence of him as a person is not the same as evidence of him having super-natural powers or connections.
I personally don't doubt that the scriptures are based on an actual person or persons (to various degrees), but the supernatural angle requires stronger evidence. "Bob said he saw the guy cure lepers" is not strong evidence. For one, we should give Bob a sobriety test first.
Yes, if you leave lead in the systems, then people will evolve lead-resistance, like Kevin Costner evolved gills in Water World. Commies and socialist interfere with the evolution of our Great Toxic-Resistant Race!
Bring on the sludge, us Ayn Rand Cowboys ain't afraid! We'll happily ride off into the brown sunset.
I force my kids to watch Mutant Ninja Turtles to show how they COULD be if the damned commies stop cleaning shit up.
but we'll manage it our way, not your UN ultra-leftist way.
Which is? If Republicans would focus on solutions instead of denial, then maybe they could offer balance and smart alternatives. If you come to sabotage the birthday party, then don't complain about the flavor of the cake.
Slashdot Mirror
I interpreted the original post as claiming Russia will slap a new facade on OSS and claim they "made it" without giving OSS credit. It may not be a dig against Russian programmers, but against Russian politicians who lie, or perhaps politicians in general, who, as we all well know in the USA, often take credit for what's not theirs and blame others for what is theirs. It's not just a Russian thing.
Now all the usual forms and databases are going to have to be reworked. And they may not stop at 3 parents, so design it for many parents.
Next the baby will be able to be its own parent, creating recursion. You go to print out a family tree, and get a Stack Overflow error.
Can you show that almost every person of that region and time has left a record that is still available?
It rarely changes this fast without some world-wide event like a meteor or super-volcano, and it's still changing: The ride ain't over.
To who? To humans displaced or bankrupted by weather changes? Yes, it matters. To dead species, Yes, I'm sure they are not happy about extinction.
On the up side, it's a good time to invest in Canadian, Alaskan, Greenland, and Siberian real-estate.
Screw your commie system, God save the Queen!
10 is a dumb base anyhow, not divisible by 3 or 4. The first tetrapods who crawled onto land had mathematically defective digits. They should have been BBQ'd and placed between bread instead.
Don't be surprised when actual patients pass spherical cows.
I guess so. What did I miss there exactly?
It's possible this Jesus person did go around preaching and claiming miracles, but others magnified and decorated the stories using existing legends. Thus, being a "composite" tale does not automatically de-existify Jesus (for lack of a better word).
I've had a kidney stone, and I'll tell you the LAST thing I wanted to do during all that pain was hop on a roller coaster. I didn't want to move, period, even after bigass pain meds.
It was the most painful thing I ever felt. I invented several new vowels and cuss-words, some Klingon, and repented to every deity I could think of. (Its effects vary per person and per stone, though.)
You got this from Flintstones, 3-Stooges, and/or Onion.com
That makes my shoulder cramp up.
WTF has been superseded by HolyShit++
Back in the old days they did all kinds of kludgey things to save bytes and/or processing time. These days we usually view such tricks as maintenance, dependency, and security risks because the hardware is cheap enough.
(Except we use web browsers to try to act like desktop GUI's, so I guess wacky kludges never die, just morph.)
Slick, it can now execute billions of bugs per second!
The problem with the browser is that HTML browsers were not originally designed to act like and/or mirror desktop-style GUI's. However, that's exactly what the industry has been trying to do for the past 2 decades, and badly. Even the big vendors F up their UI's.
If a browser were designed UP FRONT to be GUI-oriented, then browsers wouldn't need to download giant GUI JS libraries to try to mirror real GUI's. It's almost like every app downloading an OS to run. Dumb! Illogical! Bad humans!
One of my common suggestions is to make the (GUI) browser be a "dumb" vector plotter: plot shapes and input boxes based on simple linear coordinates. The flow and relative placement control would be done on the server side. This would greatly simplify the client and related standards.
That way you have only ONE layout/flow engine instead of 50-ish you have to test for on the client (Mac, Windows, iPhone, Android, times each version X, version Y, etc. etc.) Fonts would be a little trickier, but I've kicked around various solutions for those that would take a while to describe here.
I'm tired of UI's breaking and overlapping wrong in different ways on different browsers/devices. I'd rather have the 90's DLL Hell back instead of this insidious Render Hell.
Lets do it logically this time. First, we have to admit we fucked up really bad and turned UI's into rocket science. Actually, rocket science is easier: it follows physics, while the HTML stack follows Chaos Theory. It's great job security until you count your grey hairs and Tums.
Yes, but Arecibo has access to Colombian coffee, so it's 3x more efficient. Works that way for coders.
Didn't that Lego* thingumabob detect gravity waves during its testing phase? Ya never know.
* And don't tell me to google the correct spailing on a fruggin monday
bad education is turning our cops into blathering idiots.
The problem with anything in JS + DOM is that version n + x of the browser comes out and the app stops working right.
We try to force a browser to act like a desktop GUI, and it often backfires because it was not designed to be a full desktop-like GUI, and our stack of kludges eventually bytes us in the ass.
People, we are doing network UI's wrong. Time for a new standard. JS+Dom keeps sucking rotting eggs over and over in different combinations of suckativity.
"Three pixels oughtta be enough for any baby!"
- Toddler Gates
That will just fracture the (top level) client-side programming languages and not really solve the problem.
I personally think the main problem is fat clients and too many versions/variations of them. It's Testers Hell, comparable to DLL Hell.
That's not true, as other replies demonstrate, but even if it were true, it's not evidence of super-natural backing.
Evidence of existence of him as a person is not the same as evidence of him having super-natural powers or connections.
I personally don't doubt that the scriptures are based on an actual person or persons (to various degrees), but the supernatural angle requires stronger evidence. "Bob said he saw the guy cure lepers" is not strong evidence. For one, we should give Bob a sobriety test first.
Yes, if you leave lead in the systems, then people will evolve lead-resistance, like Kevin Costner evolved gills in Water World. Commies and socialist interfere with the evolution of our Great Toxic-Resistant Race!
Bring on the sludge, us Ayn Rand Cowboys ain't afraid! We'll happily ride off into the brown sunset.
I force my kids to watch Mutant Ninja Turtles to show how they COULD be if the damned commies stop cleaning shit up.
Which is? If Republicans would focus on solutions instead of denial, then maybe they could offer balance and smart alternatives. If you come to sabotage the birthday party, then don't complain about the flavor of the cake.
It's COBOL!