Foxconn Factories' Future: Fewer Humans, More Robots
Manufacturing Future: Fewer Humans, More Robots
this, is pretty much what we have all known for quite a long time. as tech gets better, menial jobs become useless to humans because robots do it better.
i honestly dont pay much attention to user names 99% of the time. Makes it easier to be objective when i ignore the posters name until i go back to check on my posts later on. by then i usually forget about the trolls.
no, its really not. give the banks protection from the people who use their services. meaning dont hold the banks responsible for the actions of the acct holder. banks should be like common carriers
nice to see someone with this crappy copy and paste republican bashing finally use their real name instead of hiding behind AC. looking at your posting history. congrats. you are such a good little troll
yes, that is exactly what they are doing it. you can put lawyer speak up all you want but it doesnt change anything. people in the US are being stripped from doing legit business with other businesses on the basis of what exactly? that they dont like encryption?? that they dont like kim dotcom?? what legal reason would they have from getting in the middle and preventing legitimate business to take place???
when we all found out who was taking over the FCC, I was terrified. Former cable lobbyist, now in charge of the group intended to regulate the same people. But it really looks like wheeler may be the right man for the job
i havent used them in probably 6 years now. I was selling diecast cars and someones order got held up at the border (canadian) so it arrived late. he put in a complain with paypal who took my money and added fees. once the die cast car arrived and he submitted the note to get it fixed on my side they did, but they still wanted their fees. and they would not cancel them eventhough I had done nothing wrong
so today I still "owe" paypal about 10-15 bucks, that they will never get out of me. they are a horrible company
banks should not be free to decide who they can do business with. If a baker cant decide they dont want to do business with a couple they disagree with, a bank should not be able to do so either.
that the banks are not to big to fail, and should have been allowed to. There is no reason what so ever that any government should get involved in peoples personal financial decisions. while kim dotcom might not be the best person in the world, there is no reason for this continued harassment
Communism is the seizure of capital by labor, followed in theory by a dictatorship of the proletariat which serves to organizes labor and resources "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
But isnt that what obama is doing with HC?? when it comes to "wealth redistribution" the only difference is hes just taking from the rich and middle class and giving to the poor and non americans
Slashdot Mirror
i dont care about his reasons, i care about his actions.
libertarians are not the ones doing this, big government is tying the hands of business. See the bigger picture
no but what if the post office decides its going to "lose" all mail addressed to mega?
What about the average to below average 3.5 billion people? They supposed to just roll over and die?
well.... it sounds heartless, but the world is way over populated as it is. I dont know the answer but we do need to cull the heard so to speak
what proposals do you have that would not be stealing from others? because other than training in a new career, i dont see anything
Foxconn Factories' Future: Fewer Humans, More Robots
Manufacturing Future: Fewer Humans, More Robots
this, is pretty much what we have all known for quite a long time. as tech gets better, menial jobs become useless to humans because robots do it better.
Also water is wet. news at 11
i honestly dont pay much attention to user names 99% of the time. Makes it easier to be objective when i ignore the posters name until i go back to check on my posts later on. by then i usually forget about the trolls.
no, its really not. give the banks protection from the people who use their services. meaning dont hold the banks responsible for the actions of the acct holder. banks should be like common carriers
nice to see someone with this crappy copy and paste republican bashing finally use their real name instead of hiding behind AC. looking at your posting history. congrats. you are such a good little troll
yes, that is exactly what they are doing it. you can put lawyer speak up all you want but it doesnt change anything. people in the US are being stripped from doing legit business with other businesses on the basis of what exactly? that they dont like encryption?? that they dont like kim dotcom?? what legal reason would they have from getting in the middle and preventing legitimate business to take place???
when we all found out who was taking over the FCC, I was terrified. Former cable lobbyist, now in charge of the group intended to regulate the same people. But it really looks like wheeler may be the right man for the job
that tells you all you need to know about which party he is in.
if they dont say it, you can bet its a democrat
i havent used them in probably 6 years now. I was selling diecast cars and someones order got held up at the border (canadian) so it arrived late. he put in a complain with paypal who took my money and added fees. once the die cast car arrived and he submitted the note to get it fixed on my side they did, but they still wanted their fees. and they would not cancel them eventhough I had done nothing wrong
so today I still "owe" paypal about 10-15 bucks, that they will never get out of me. they are a horrible company
banks should not be free to decide who they can do business with. If a baker cant decide they dont want to do business with a couple they disagree with, a bank should not be able to do so either.
that the banks are not to big to fail, and should have been allowed to. There is no reason what so ever that any government should get involved in peoples personal financial decisions. while kim dotcom might not be the best person in the world, there is no reason for this continued harassment
sign me up!
simple. hillary
Communism is the seizure of capital by labor, followed in theory by a dictatorship of the proletariat which serves to organizes labor and resources "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
But isnt that what obama is doing with HC?? when it comes to "wealth redistribution" the only difference is hes just taking from the rich and middle class and giving to the poor and non americans
there is. you could have not voted for obama the 2nd time when you saw how horrible he was the first time
well, technically you are right. but also, congress needs to approve the war, obama cant simple declare war, congress does.
truth is trolling now???
because... .DEV!!!! come on man@@!@!!!
pretty sure the adult industry got that one already
no, this is not the beta you were hearing about. this isnt that bad. i actually like it so far.. the beta you heard about was HORRIBLE
you would be shocked to find out that there is a good chance that century link is actually comcast as far as 99% of things are concerned.