Moron, ya sure, slander companies, that's quite enlightened. Really, company bashing goes to show just how low the ignorant can go. Can't make money honestly, no problem, cheat your company and treat them force them into bankruptcy!*
. Someone commented that decades ago, we were told that in future (that's now) the work week would be shorter and living standards higher. Yes, we said that in the 60's and 70's. So why didn't that happen? If we had kept the 35% unionization rate we had back then, it would have.
being in a union doesnt make you care about the company you work for, it makes you care about the union you belong to. you dont care if you are a parasite on the company (in the case of the UAW anyway) as long as the union strong arms them into paying you more to do less.
by not allowing it to end, that is expanding it. It was suposed to end, but he kept it alive. even if the provisions are all identical, "expanding it" is still a proper term to use.
well that is not what you said. you specifically said as i quoted, "all of the domestic surveillance" which is clearly false as i have shown, and as you know.
Argue with the law if you want (although the law makes a lot more sense than geeks like to think), but don't argue from a position of ignorance.
the problem is you are correct. but it is fedex who is the one arguing from the position of ignorance. There is nothing wrong with a CNC machine, in fact, that is the argument everyone loves to bring up when pointing out that 3d printing is not going to change things because people could ALWAYS do it on their own.
well now everyone knows he has a product. and i doubt UPS will refuse his money. so it is a win win for them, while at the same time painting fedex in a bad light (regardless of this being their "right")
not all forms of censorship have to be government sponsored.
On that same note, not all private censorship is bad. For example if someone is having a comic convention. they may "censor" people trying to sell baseball cards
If i go to a football game at lembo field, im not selling jerseys for the carolina panthers. thats censorship however, but there is nothing wrong with it
the constitution has not been amended last time i checked. therefore anything tomorrow that is found unconstitutional, will have been unconstitutional from the start, if the program has started after the last constitutional convention.
only one can correct it at this point in time. they have not. therefore at this point in time, the blame lies with obama. in 3 years when we have a new president, if he doesnt end the spying, it will be his fault.
Under which administration did all of the domestic surveillance get started? Under W Bush, a Republican.
who modded this up? If you think domestic surveillance only started under bush you are a fool. Everyone knows that going back at LEAST as far as FDR it was going on . then you got hoover in the FBI for how many decades??? McCarthyism??? to think it started under bush is either ignorant or intentionally false
Slashdot Mirror
Moron, ya sure, slander companies, that's quite enlightened. Really, company bashing goes to show just how low the ignorant can go. Can't make money honestly, no problem, cheat your company and treat them force them into bankruptcy!*
FTFY
This is exactly what happened in detroit
. Someone commented that decades ago, we were told that in future (that's now) the work week would be shorter and living standards higher. Yes, we said that in the 60's and 70's. So why didn't that happen? If we had kept the 35% unionization rate we had back then, it would have.
OR is it because of the unions??
being in a union doesnt make you care about the company you work for, it makes you care about the union you belong to. you dont care if you are a parasite on the company (in the case of the UAW anyway) as long as the union strong arms them into paying you more to do less.
and he lived to be 83, thats not a short life. if i make it to 70 ill be happy lol
which is what I think made him a perfect voice actor/narrator. he didnt have range, but he had consistency.
I call the jug!
I actually am a fan of the ACLU even if i dont always agree with the cases they tend to pick up....
you, you get tenure ;)
you are right, they want to pay these particular bus drivers even more than I get paid!
or detroit
yeah, you pretty much proved my point... the ACLU does not care about the 2nd
by not allowing it to end, that is expanding it. It was suposed to end, but he kept it alive. even if the provisions are all identical, "expanding it" is still a proper term to use.
no, but focusing the blame on the people who cant do anything about it is a waste of time, and a political tool used to keep the fighting going.
extending provisions, expanding it. in the end we are still being abused by our president
or as hillary once said "what difference does it make!?!?!!!"
well that is not what you said. you specifically said as i quoted, "all of the domestic surveillance" which is clearly false as i have shown, and as you know.
not really the argument being made
fed ex is claiming that it might be illegal to do so (which is wrong), has nothing to do with political views.
In fact, if fedex came out and claimed it was their views, im sure cody would simply say ok, and use UPS without much of an issue
Argue with the law if you want (although the law makes a lot more sense than geeks like to think), but don't argue from a position of ignorance.
the problem is you are correct. but it is fedex who is the one arguing from the position of ignorance. There is nothing wrong with a CNC machine, in fact, that is the argument everyone loves to bring up when pointing out that 3d printing is not going to change things because people could ALWAYS do it on their own.
well now everyone knows he has a product. and i doubt UPS will refuse his money. so it is a win win for them, while at the same time painting fedex in a bad light (regardless of this being their "right")
if the product is leagal (as a CNC mill is) there is no legit reason for a shipping company not to take the package.
This is nothing but targeted discrimination. where is the ACLU???
not all forms of censorship have to be government sponsored.
On that same note, not all private censorship is bad. For example if someone is having a comic convention. they may "censor" people trying to sell baseball cards
If i go to a football game at lembo field, im not selling jerseys for the carolina panthers. thats censorship however, but there is nothing wrong with it
the constitution has not been amended last time i checked. therefore anything tomorrow that is found unconstitutional, will have been unconstitutional from the start, if the program has started after the last constitutional convention.
thanks for the information. let me guess, you work for one of the ABCs???
only one can correct it at this point in time. they have not. therefore at this point in time, the blame lies with obama. in 3 years when we have a new president, if he doesnt end the spying, it will be his fault.
and obama has a chance to axe the patriot act, and he did the opposite, he expanded it.
Under which administration did all of the domestic surveillance get started? Under W Bush, a Republican.
who modded this up? If you think domestic surveillance only started under bush you are a fool. Everyone knows that going back at LEAST as far as FDR it was going on . then you got hoover in the FBI for how many decades??? McCarthyism??? to think it started under bush is either ignorant or intentionally false