I find it hard to make the claim that a co author stole work that he did and or payed for (or currently is paying for) Perhaps it was in bad taste, but the fact is this is rand pauls suit, and the lawyers are working for him. Therefore I can excuse this
or to but it in the words of the darling of the democratic party "What difference does it make!"
All costs spent are detailed. you can see for yourself.
one issue I do have is the fact that michelle and the kids and the president tend to take different planes, at a cost of millions to the tax payer when they go away. I wont argue whether or not they should be going away as much as they do but traveling on different modes of transportation costs us millions in extra every year
You seem to forget that the libertarians started the tea party movement, it was co opted by those republicans. But seriously, the media likes to spout out the racism card as you just did, dont fall into that trap. yes there are members of the tea party that are racist, but there are people in EVERY group who are racist. Unlike other groups if a clearly racist person is at a tea party event, they are removed quicky.
disclosure, I am not a tea party member, but I do documentaries and have done documentaries in NYC for both tea party rallies and occupy wallstreet. I saw WAY more racists / anarchists at occupy then I did at tea party
anti abortion - on a personal level, not on a policy level, which is the right way to be. He doesnt want to ban abortions, he doesnt want me and you to have to pay for them but he doesnt want them outlawed
Anti progressive tax.... and? hes anti tax period of course he is anti progressive tax. We want equality across the board, And that means everyone should pay into the system equally. We currently have a system where the top 10% pay some 80% of the taxes, regardless of what you hear in the media the rich are paying for us all.
Anti feminist... Feminists are just man haters, we should be against hate groups of all kinds be it the black panthers or the KKK or yes feminists. at least radical feminists
Anti environment? Citations please. Because as far as I can tell he is not
Not answering how old the earth is? well duh its clearly a stupid question that should never be asked in the first place in this day and age. The only reason it is asked is to get talking points.
ignoring the best interests of the people? Again citations needed. The fact of the matter is he is one of a small handful of people who actually believes in the constitution, and he is one of the few people fighting the government for the people, as this lawsuit shows
Canadian, well that explains why you dont understand, as you are spoonfed misinformation by the media
do you want the wishy washy feel good answer? or the truth??
People are stupid. thats all there is too it, Look at the last 5 elections or so for proof of that. the senate was intended to be voted on by the smart people in the house, not by the dumb people all over the country who can tell you who won american idol but cant tell you who the secretary of the state is. When we elect people based on promises of what they will give me, we are all doomed. With all that in mind, yes taking the senate back from the people actually would be in our best interest. One of the few times that I actually am for taking rights from americans
That would be entertaining but look at the potential implications
Someone who doesnt like lets say, america is in lets say, a tower in some city, lets say NYC. And they point a laser at a plane, which in turn shoots a hellfire missile at the empire stat building.
its sad when the news sources (Fox news MSNBC) cant be trusted because they are so full of shit that we in america have to rely on outside sources for reliable news
well I believe in evolution but not AGW. or correction, I dont disagree that AGW *may* be happening, I simply believe if it is, its not the doom and gloom that the supporters make it otu to be.
to me, the AGW crowd is the same as the people who believe that the rapture is coming, just their rapture is sea rising.
say you are a high schooler, you post some nudes, or send them to your boyfriend girlfriend.
Now lets pretend its 30 years later and you want to run for office, well guess what the other party, or people who want to run against you in your own part will have access to that information to use against you.
as the summary says... its not just republicans doing this.
having said that, I see nothing wrong with what is being done. If someone is too stupid to read who they are giving money to, then its better spent on the other party, regardless of who it is anyway
why would you start this thread with "the GOP war on science marches on" when it is the GOP who is trying to bring transparency to science? In fact I believe this bill would in fact be used to stop ID from going further. I wonder if they didnt think that through
ok,and we have laws on the books that say assault is illegal. If someone were to harass you for (insert fear here) they would be held accountable.
the net side benefit to society (not the victim though) is eventually all these violent bigots would be removed from society by their own law breaking ways
picking nits. While not all democrats are liberals this is true, there are way more than 2 + 50 but I get what you are putting down The libertarians were also warning from the begining. Its as if the far left and far right get things right, for different reasons and the "middle" who all want "compromise" cant get jack shit right
Slashdot Mirror
lets be real, Spying on americans has been going on far longer than since 9/11. In fact FDR why spying on americans.
Rand didnt get into congress until 2011. But please, Id love to know how he voted for something in 2006, That would be an amazing feat....
Idiot
I find it hard to make the claim that a co author stole work that he did and or payed for (or currently is paying for) Perhaps it was in bad taste, but the fact is this is rand pauls suit, and the lawyers are working for him. Therefore I can excuse this
or to but it in the words of the darling of the democratic party "What difference does it make!"
All costs spent are detailed. you can see for yourself.
one issue I do have is the fact that michelle and the kids and the president tend to take different planes, at a cost of millions to the tax payer when they go away. I wont argue whether or not they should be going away as much as they do but traveling on different modes of transportation costs us millions in extra every year
You seem to forget that the libertarians started the tea party movement, it was co opted by those republicans. But seriously, the media likes to spout out the racism card as you just did, dont fall into that trap. yes there are members of the tea party that are racist, but there are people in EVERY group who are racist. Unlike other groups if a clearly racist person is at a tea party event, they are removed quicky.
disclosure, I am not a tea party member, but I do documentaries and have done documentaries in NYC for both tea party rallies and occupy wallstreet. I saw WAY more racists / anarchists at occupy then I did at tea party
lets go over your "facts"
anti abortion - on a personal level, not on a policy level, which is the right way to be. He doesnt want to ban abortions, he doesnt want me and you to have to pay for them but he doesnt want them outlawed
Anti progressive tax.... and? hes anti tax period of course he is anti progressive tax. We want equality across the board, And that means everyone should pay into the system equally. We currently have a system where the top 10% pay some 80% of the taxes, regardless of what you hear in the media the rich are paying for us all.
Anti feminist... Feminists are just man haters, we should be against hate groups of all kinds be it the black panthers or the KKK or yes feminists. at least radical feminists
Anti environment? Citations please. Because as far as I can tell he is not
Not answering how old the earth is? well duh its clearly a stupid question that should never be asked in the first place in this day and age. The only reason it is asked is to get talking points.
ignoring the best interests of the people? Again citations needed. The fact of the matter is he is one of a small handful of people who actually believes in the constitution, and he is one of the few people fighting the government for the people, as this lawsuit shows
Canadian, well that explains why you dont understand, as you are spoonfed misinformation by the media
do you want the wishy washy feel good answer? or the truth??
People are stupid. thats all there is too it, Look at the last 5 elections or so for proof of that. the senate was intended to be voted on by the smart people in the house, not by the dumb people all over the country who can tell you who won american idol but cant tell you who the secretary of the state is. When we elect people based on promises of what they will give me, we are all doomed. With all that in mind, yes taking the senate back from the people actually would be in our best interest. One of the few times that I actually am for taking rights from americans
After re reading i do see that your subset was reversed from the way I initially read it.Thank you for clarification
That would be entertaining but look at the potential implications
Someone who doesnt like lets say, america is in lets say, a tower in some city, lets say NYC. And they point a laser at a plane, which in turn shoots a hellfire missile at the empire stat building.
Too many potential issues with such a plan
its sad when the news sources (Fox news MSNBC) cant be trusted because they are so full of shit that we in america have to rely on outside sources for reliable news
well I believe in evolution but not AGW. or correction, I dont disagree that AGW *may* be happening, I simply believe if it is, its not the doom and gloom that the supporters make it otu to be.
to me, the AGW crowd is the same as the people who believe that the rapture is coming, just their rapture is sea rising.
With chrome around their concern is that google wont stick around forever
say you are a high schooler, you post some nudes, or send them to your boyfriend girlfriend.
Now lets pretend its 30 years later and you want to run for office, well guess what the other party, or people who want to run against you in your own part will have access to that information to use against you.
He broke the law. He even admits it. This makes him a criminal.
says the person who thinks booth is a patriot?
a safe bet would be the same number of congressmen... all of them
fuck it, lets stream it live!
funny thing is they have been telling the republicans for 5 years now that they are evil and unwilling to work with the other side.
....1 page... easily readable bill
now a common sense approach, and the democrats and leftists are all up in arms over the
as the summary says... its not just republicans doing this.
having said that, I see nothing wrong with what is being done. If someone is too stupid to read who they are giving money to, then its better spent on the other party, regardless of who it is anyway
why would you start this thread with "the GOP war on science marches on" when it is the GOP who is trying to bring transparency to science? In fact I believe this bill would in fact be used to stop ID from going further. I wonder if they didnt think that through
This is a bill coming from the GOP??? and its pro transparent science?? Color me skeptical, but this looks like a good idea to me
ok ,and we have laws on the books that say assault is illegal. If someone were to harass you for (insert fear here) they would be held accountable.
the net side benefit to society (not the victim though) is eventually all these violent bigots would be removed from society by their own law breaking ways
I feel the same way about democrats, they are just a little less stupid than the avg bleeding heart liberals
. fucking scared ass nerds
says the ac...
yeah but the drug offence is not on a public registry, and you dont have to tell all your neighbors you smoked a joint
picking nits. While not all democrats are liberals this is true, there are way more than 2 + 50 but I get what you are putting down The libertarians were also warning from the begining. Its as if the far left and far right get things right, for different reasons and the "middle" who all want "compromise" cant get jack shit right