Slashdot Mirror


User: ganjadude

ganjadude's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,568
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,568

  1. Re:Who wants a driverless tesla roadster? on Tesla's Elon Musk Talks With Google About Self-Driving Cars · · Score: 1

    no you didnt, I got the joke, I was just playing it back on your name as well ;)

  2. Re:Who wants a driverless tesla roadster? on Tesla's Elon Musk Talks With Google About Self-Driving Cars · · Score: 1

    Right, because my screen name is ganjadude it must mean that im high 24/7 and drive stoned all the time. You must wear nothing but suade right jony??

  3. Re:brand new tech on Google Glass Hands-On: Brimming With Potential, Dangerous While Driving · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yes, because a wearable computer in 1980 could access pretty much any information in the world damn near instantaneously.

    stop being a fool, oh.. AC.. makes sense now

  4. brand new tech on Google Glass Hands-On: Brimming With Potential, Dangerous While Driving · · Score: 2

    This is brand new tech, everyone who has it still has a beta version of the end product if my memory serves me right. of course its not perfect yet. but the concept is amazing (negating the creepy factor) and im sure after a generation or 2 all the kinks i keep reading about will be ironed out. Most of the kinks seem to me people simply using the devices in ways that google may not have anticipated, or people want them to do more then they can.

    its still too early to tell, but it does look promising

  5. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    I didnt say it was good, only that it is better from the state level then from the federal level. one persons tyranny is another persons nanny state.

  6. Re:Who wants a driverless tesla roadster? on Tesla's Elon Musk Talks With Google About Self-Driving Cars · · Score: 1

    judging a book by its cover? Ill have you know ive been driving for 10 years and have a totally clean record. then again why am I wasting my time on a coward anyway

  7. Re:Major problem here on Tesla's Elon Musk Talks With Google About Self-Driving Cars · · Score: 1

    WOOOSH

  8. Re:Who wants a driverless tesla roadster? on Tesla's Elon Musk Talks With Google About Self-Driving Cars · · Score: 1

    maybe to you, there are a lot of us out here who actually enjoy getting behind the wheel and driving. I cant stand riding in a car but I LOVE driving it.

  9. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    Ill ceed the first point, It was a bit confusing with the back and forth. but the "arbitrary line" is not so arbitrary when it would take me little to no effort and money to move from say NY to NJ if I dont like what is happening in NJ, it would be much harder to find another country, that I dont know anyone in, dont know the laws of the land and dont want to deal with the immigration process.

    moving from one state to another can take a month or 2

    moving from the US to a different country (not including the time it would take to research all the other countries) would take years.

  10. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    im not going to start an armed revolution because of a paint restriction einstein. Sure I could leave the country, but thats not the point, Obviously I am talkinb about inter country travel

  11. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1
  12. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    you just made my point for me

    if the federal government makes the laws - you cant go anywhere else

    if the state makes the laws, you can go somewhere else.

    if you enjoy being told what you can do in your own property then thats good for you, But If I want to paint my house red or have a specialty mailbox i dont think I should have to ask my "neighbors" (some HOAs are entire communities not just a street with a few people on it, you may never even know your "neighbors" who come up with the rules)

  13. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    and they will charge you(the business) for it, who will then charge me, the consumer for it. it is not a good plan by any means

  14. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    so in other words, the cost of products not only go up due to the taxes, but due to the tax preparers that will be needed to do this. In essence a double tax if you will. So that 1$ item now becomes a 5$ item

  15. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    to be fair, jesus MAY have been a real person

  16. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    Is "tyranny" (to use the hyperbolic rhetoric used by some) any better if it's instituted at a state vs federal level? Local vs state?

    YES! See It is easy for me to move from one state to another if I do not like the way the government is running (for example I am leaving New York for better things)

    When it is done at the federal level, there is no where else to go.

  17. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    no but on a micro scale, Home Owner Associations (HOAs) are a form of socilism, and anyone who has ever had the displeasure of living in a HOA knows how horrible they can be.

    hey frank, we dont like the color of your house, if you dont paint it white like the rest of us you will be fined until you do

    this is a scenario I have had to deal with personally, there are many more horror stories you can find on the web.

  18. Re:Old news... on Box With Hidden Camera Travels Through the Mail · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you do know not everyone reads every site on the web right?

  19. maybe, maybe not on Are Contests the Best Way To Find Programmers? · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe that this is a good way to bring in young talent, people in college or kids who dont have a formal education but are self taught and need a shot.

    I dont expect this to be a good method for bringing in top level experienced workers however.

  20. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 3, Informative

    there is a large difference between filling out a tax form for every location that has its own tax. and typing in a zipcode on a package. I have seen numbers from anywhere between 1500 and 3000 different tax locations. As such thats 1500-3000 different tax forms needed to be filled out by the business

    this is an unreasonable cost to any business.

  21. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Right because your single experience is representive of the best thing for everyone

  22. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 1

    most of us have no issue paying taxes for the basics. its the convoluted mess that the federal government has become that we take issue with. If it is not written in the constitution , the FEDERAL government should refer to the states and let them decide how to do XX. Ironically this is probably the only time the commerce clause is being used as intended, albeit it is an over reaching unattainable nightmare for any small company with an online presence.

  23. Re:Thank me later. on It's 2013, and Windows Activation Is Still Frustrating · · Score: 1

    obviously he was talking about chromeOS

  24. Re:bollocks on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 2

    A lot of local businesses have expanded to the internet these days though. for example in my area honey and wood work and syrup are big, usually sold in small store front by a single person. They do around 80% of their sales online these days. This is exactly the person who is going to be hurt by this law. how is this 1 person suposed to handle tax law in over 2000 different locations?

  25. Re:Republicans control the house on US Senate Passes Internet Tax Bill 69 To 27 · · Score: 2

    congress has the purse strings

    note the large increase in spending took place once the democrats took control of congress. It has nothing to do with the bush tax cuts.