an attempted mass shooting tok place this weekend in texas, (ignored by the media) a citizen stopped the crazy with 1 bullet from his legally carried gun.
of all those points you made, the NYT and 90% of the media dont "report the news" these days. They report sob stories and push agendas. They dont tell the facts only. They tell SOME facts to back up the narative they want to push.
Prime example. EVERY news outlet today is reporting about how there have been 62 mass shootings in the past 32 years. Which is true. What they are NOT reporting is that of those, 61 happened in gun free zones. A very important fact when trying to make policy.
and at one point in time the NYT was just some guy printing words on paper hoping someone would read them. What makes the NYT so superior that they can use their first amendment right but wikileaks cannot?
well If facebook is doing this, Than it leads me to believe that faceboook is responsible for ALL content on their site. If facebook is responsible for the content, and not the users who made the post, than when someone posts kiddy porn, Than the people who run facebook should be charged.
1 - the movie was incorrectly attributed to the pre planned attacks that resulted in the deaths of more than a few americans.
2 - If anybody actually thought that the eqyptian government was going to be all good now because of the uprising clearly has not been paying attention. Id love to visit but not until there is another revolution there.
I was thinking the same. Whatnext, if he posts that he has a headache he gets investigated for stock manipulation?? you know because people MIGHT think that he is REALLY sick??
Can someone explain why the SEC would even care about something as simple as bragging??
so they are making componants in other countries... and putting them together in america...
I am sorry but to me, that is even worse than making it in china. Because to me that is playing on stupid people. "oh it was built in america, apple must really care" eventhough it was built elsewhere, and only assembled here.
This is very true. When I was in Germany I went to the dachau camp. It was a very somber experience. There was plenty explaining exactly what happened on the grounds. It was preserved and rebuilt in some ways, but it was never "endorsed"
As long as this memorial is done in a way that explains the things that happened, and why they were done, without claiming that "the japz are teh badz" than I think it is a good thing
Exactly. Why cant the site owners sue the sender of the takedown for loss of revenues and mis-use of the law? IANAL but there should be some thing that they can do top stop this.
Most of it is an addon currently. This is more about bringing the tech into the browser standards if i can read through this badly written summary anyway
Slashdot Mirror
outlawing marijuana REALLY stopped all of us americans from smoking it......
62 mass shootings in 30 years
61 took place in gunfree zones
an attempted mass shooting tok place this weekend in texas, (ignored by the media) a citizen stopped the crazy with 1 bullet from his legally carried gun.
yeah...guns are the problem...
of all those points you made, the NYT and 90% of the media dont "report the news" these days. They report sob stories and push agendas. They dont tell the facts only. They tell SOME facts to back up the narative they want to push.
Prime example. EVERY news outlet today is reporting about how there have been 62 mass shootings in the past 32 years. Which is true. What they are NOT reporting is that of those, 61 happened in gun free zones. A very important fact when trying to make policy.
and at one point in time the NYT was just some guy printing words on paper hoping someone would read them. What makes the NYT so superior that they can use their first amendment right but wikileaks cannot?
bullshit. When I was in germany a few years ago I had 100 euros and my visa card. There was not one place I could not use it at
well If facebook is doing this, Than it leads me to believe that faceboook is responsible for ALL content on their site. If facebook is responsible for the content, and not the users who made the post, than when someone posts kiddy porn, Than the people who run facebook should be charged.
1 - the movie was incorrectly attributed to the pre planned attacks that resulted in the deaths of more than a few americans.
2 - If anybody actually thought that the eqyptian government was going to be all good now because of the uprising clearly has not been paying attention. Id love to visit but not until there is another revolution there.
and some of us were busy watching scrambled porn , in black and white. every now and again you would think you saw a boob. Those were the days
I am very aware of the situation at hand.
/. reader you would think that you would know a joke when you see one by now
as a
Does this mean I can get the EU patent on rounded corners?
joking but seriously I hope that they have some kind of common sense approach over there.
I was refering to the mod, not you with that, my apologies but yes, I am in the hudson valley and it is a great place to live
no, i was genuinely serious. I dont know how the rules work, but if you can only make public by specific channels, I find issue with that.
so...how does one make something public without releasing it??
Is the facebook profile set to "friends only" (doubt it with 200K views of the post) therefore wouldnt making the post BE making it public?
all im saying is how is releasing something on facebook any different than releasing it in any other medium in this day and age?
I was thinking the same. Whatnext, if he posts that he has a headache he gets investigated for stock manipulation?? you know because people MIGHT think that he is REALLY sick??
Can someone explain why the SEC would even care about something as simple as bragging??
so they are making componants in other countries... and putting them together in america...
I am sorry but to me, that is even worse than making it in china. Because to me that is playing on stupid people. "oh it was built in america, apple must really care" eventhough it was built elsewhere, and only assembled here.
no nomads?
This is very true. When I was in Germany I went to the dachau camp. It was a very somber experience. There was plenty explaining exactly what happened on the grounds. It was preserved and rebuilt in some ways, but it was never "endorsed"
As long as this memorial is done in a way that explains the things that happened, and why they were done, without claiming that "the japz are teh badz" than I think it is a good thing
so?? that changes nothing. If they dont like it, they can make their own "internet" if not, than play by our rules
flamebait? hardly.... Just telling how it is by me
what mode doesnot matter but by either train (10 min drive to the train station) or car (an hour on the thruway)
where i live in NY 1500 a month gets you aa 3K SQ ft house and 5 acres of land, and its only an hour commute from NYC
fuck san fran is what im saying
what exactly do you mean by rifraff.......
It what it should be, is it what it is though? no...sadly no...
Exactly. Why cant the site owners sue the sender of the takedown for loss of revenues and mis-use of the law? IANAL but there should be some thing that they can do top stop this.
Most of it is an addon currently. This is more about bringing the tech into the browser standards if i can read through this badly written summary anyway
it only takes 1 though. options are a great thing arent they??