you know, I always hear about this "grave injustice", and I will gladly say that blacks are unfailry jailed in relation to others, usually for drug crimes. But I really am getting sick and tired of that excuse. The jews were slaves for millenia, you never hear them asking for handouts, the Japs who were put in internment camps durring WW2, the native americans, who I think we would all agree were screwed worse than any other group, NEVER hear them make the arguments or complaints that they are being treated unfairly due to the things that happened in the past, Yet for some reason, SOME people cant get over things that happened to other people, who have the same skin color, and may or may not even be in any relation with the said person complaining.
plain and simple, everything should be based on the best person, make or female, back or white for the job, NO preferential treatment for or against anyone should be a factor in obtaining a job. If 30 men take a test, and 28 of them are one color 2 a different color, a company is hiring 5 people, if one of those 2 people of different colors are not in the top 5, they dont get the job, simple as that. If we want things to be "fair" we need to BE fair, not be preferential to anyone for any reason.
and our bottom 50% pay no taxes, which i guess you could say screws us in the 50%-90% range, but plain and simple the largest redistribution of wealth does not go (meaning no money was taken from you or I and given to "the rich") the rich, but it goes to pet projects. The military, one of the few things the constitution protects the procreation of funds for, SS and medicare, something it does not.
wost part about that is the people who would have been "selected out" in years past are far more likely to be the ones keeping their inferior genes going, while the top of the line genes are less likely to procreate.
I was all with you until you made the claim that we redistribute weath to the richest. You can badmouth them all you want, I prefer to hope to be one of them, and I know damn well if the top 10% pay 70% of the tax burdon (true) than the distribution of weath is not going in their favor
Ill say it again a "tax break" is NOT giving money to the rich, its simply taking less money from them
so? you would prefer to have the doctor who is there to save your life there for the sole purpose of making a quota? or do you want the best doctor possible for the job? Personally I would not want to have to worry about the fact that the person of XX is working there while a better doctor was not given the job just because of some quota.
At least be honest with yourself acting as if OWS is completely perfect and has done no wrong. on group set up free, donation driven, volunteer rape tents due to the women who were in fact being raped as well, and the other had permits and remained non violent, well except for those damn signs, words on paper are SOO much more hurtful than actual, you know, punches to the face as I witnessed numerous times in NYC during the OWS destruction.
you dont have to like the tea party, or what it stands for to see that the side you agree with may not be the greatest group you want representing you.
I was not very clear, I was actually talking about IE coming preloaded on windows causing MS marketshare to be artificially high. My apologies, its early
dont know why im bothering with an anon, but the difference is you can run windows 7, and 8, and things like ubuntu on PCs from 2001 or so. The active lifetime of a machine, if taken care of has gone up 10 fold
interesting argument, and I am all for allowing the 3rd party the right to do as it pleases, however the point remains, party A gives me a loan, I pay party B in full for (insert item / service here) party A should not be able to bypass me and go to party B for any reason, party A has no relationship with party B in practice. If a friend lends me money to buy a car, he cant go too the dealership and demand they hold the title until I pay him back
by that logic if I am using the same bank that you are using, I should be able to put a lein on your house if you owe the bank I affiliate with any money.
The issues with your argument is that you canw alk back one step further and see that all these things are requirements by the government student aid? many government loans there so your not really correct there food, government requires schools to provide food to XX standards, you need XX permits to operate at a school, blame the regulation there
houseing, what? most student housing around any campus I have been around minus the dorms (which are owned by the schools 90% of the time) are private owned by and rented out, you dont like it, you buy one of the houses by a college and rent it yourself.
homework assignments....ok now I know you are just making shit up. Please explain to me what having to do homework has to do with corporations? MOST homework at a school (a good one) is set up by your professor and his/her helpers, not "a corporation"
bookstores... well, yeah what else did you expect? corps are best suited to be in business of selling goods, you dont like it buy a bunch of books and talk a school into letting you open shop you really need to think things a few steps further down the road.
The point is the college is owed no money, it has been paid, it therefore has no reason whatsoever to hold up the release of transcripts. If the school was giving you the loans, it would be a different story and they could do as they please, but when the facts are
you got a 3rd party loan
you paid the college for your classes
the college has no vested interest in holding your transcripts.
This is the kind of thing that happens when you allow the government to get in the middle. I am just glad that I didnt make the mistake of getting into the mess of student loans. There really is no excuse for what is going on here
Slashdot Mirror
"Murrkins, FTFY
Fuck yeah!
you know, I always hear about this "grave injustice", and I will gladly say that blacks are unfailry jailed in relation to others, usually for drug crimes. But I really am getting sick and tired of that excuse. The jews were slaves for millenia, you never hear them asking for handouts, the Japs who were put in internment camps durring WW2, the native americans, who I think we would all agree were screwed worse than any other group, NEVER hear them make the arguments or complaints that they are being treated unfairly due to the things that happened in the past, Yet for some reason, SOME people cant get over things that happened to other people, who have the same skin color, and may or may not even be in any relation with the said person complaining.
plain and simple, everything should be based on the best person, make or female, back or white for the job, NO preferential treatment for or against anyone should be a factor in obtaining a job. If 30 men take a test, and 28 of them are one color 2 a different color, a company is hiring 5 people, if one of those 2 people of different colors are not in the top 5, they dont get the job, simple as that. If we want things to be "fair" we need to BE fair, not be preferential to anyone for any reason.
The answer is yes, because the mother in question is dead.
and our bottom 50% pay no taxes, which i guess you could say screws us in the 50%-90% range, but plain and simple the largest redistribution of wealth does not go (meaning no money was taken from you or I and given to "the rich") the rich, but it goes to pet projects. The military, one of the few things the constitution protects the procreation of funds for, SS and medicare, something it does not.
wost part about that is the people who would have been "selected out" in years past are far more likely to be the ones keeping their inferior genes going, while the top of the line genes are less likely to procreate.
I was all with you until you made the claim that we redistribute weath to the richest. You can badmouth them all you want, I prefer to hope to be one of them, and I know damn well if the top 10% pay 70% of the tax burdon (true) than the distribution of weath is not going in their favor
Ill say it again a "tax break" is NOT giving money to the rich, its simply taking less money from them
whos the asshole that moded this troll???? playing into the tread != to troll
did you miss the "almost guarenteed" part? to me that is not = to ALWAYS
so? you would prefer to have the doctor who is there to save your life there for the sole purpose of making a quota? or do you want the best doctor possible for the job? Personally I would not want to have to worry about the fact that the person of XX is working there while a better doctor was not given the job just because of some quota.
IIRC, the companies did try and sue to the VCR makers to remove the FF button, and the record button
pfft, overrated
pics or it didnt happen...
250 hours free? I remember 10 hours free on a floppy disk!
obligatory off my lawn and so on and so forth
so in other words, anon cowards internet is more important than every other internet user.
At least be honest with yourself acting as if OWS is completely perfect and has done no wrong.
on group set up free, donation driven, volunteer rape tents due to the women who were in fact being raped as well, and the other had permits and remained non violent, well except for those damn signs, words on paper are SOO much more hurtful than actual, you know, punches to the face as I witnessed numerous times in NYC during the OWS destruction.
you dont have to like the tea party, or what it stands for to see that the side you agree with may not be the greatest group you want representing you.
I was not very clear, I was actually talking about IE coming preloaded on windows causing MS marketshare to be artificially high. My apologies, its early
is not at all artificially inflating the numbers.
or what about MS specific webapps such as their CRM system? I mean I could see if opera were the company that was making the complaint.
Hate to invoke godwin, but do you think the blonde hair blued eye germans in the 30s thought they were living in a police state?
I prefer
TSA: bringing more terror to flight than actual terrorists!
dont know why im bothering with an anon, but the difference is you can run windows 7, and 8, and things like ubuntu on PCs from 2001 or so. The active lifetime of a machine, if taken care of has gone up 10 fold
interesting argument, and I am all for allowing the 3rd party the right to do as it pleases, however the point remains, party A gives me a loan, I pay party B in full for (insert item / service here) party A should not be able to bypass me and go to party B for any reason, party A has no relationship with party B in practice. If a friend lends me money to buy a car, he cant go too the dealership and demand they hold the title until I pay him back
by that logic if I am using the same bank that you are using, I should be able to put a lein on your house if you owe the bank I affiliate with any money.
The issues with your argument is that you canw alk back one step further and see that all these things are requirements by the government
student aid? many government loans there so your not really correct there
food, government requires schools to provide food to XX standards, you need XX permits to operate at a school, blame the regulation there
houseing, what? most student housing around any campus I have been around minus the dorms (which are owned by the schools 90% of the time) are private owned by and rented out, you dont like it, you buy one of the houses by a college and rent it yourself.
homework assignments....ok now I know you are just making shit up. Please explain to me what having to do homework has to do with corporations? MOST homework at a school (a good one) is set up by your professor and his/her helpers, not "a corporation"
bookstores... well, yeah what else did you expect? corps are best suited to be in business of selling goods, you dont like it buy a bunch of books and talk a school into letting you open shop
you really need to think things a few steps further down the road.
The point is the college is owed no money, it has been paid, it therefore has no reason whatsoever to hold up the release of transcripts. If the school was giving you the loans, it would be a different story and they could do as they please, but when the facts are
you got a 3rd party loan
you paid the college for your classes
the college has no vested interest in holding your transcripts.
This is the kind of thing that happens when you allow the government to get in the middle. I am just glad that I didnt make the mistake of getting into the mess of student loans. There really is no excuse for what is going on here