is that DHS is asking them to allow the people to stay, but (typical/. fashion didnt RTFA) 1 how did DHS know that they were being attacked unless the companies told dhs, or dhs was already monitoring said companies to begin with.
we have this thing called the internet, im sure if you look REALLY REALLY hard you can find the specs, there is this site, called http://www.google.com/ , check it out
and they also give out a lot of services, free of cost to the community, its a one hand washes the other situation. not all of them mind you, we have abusers as we always will, but the majority of them do way more for my community than my government does and im not a religious person
the gov doesnt "give" money to the church, they simply dont collect a tax from them, Its quite a stretch to claim that not collecting a tax is somehow the gov giving them money
but if they dont make money, there is no subsidy, because a subsidy is not the government (or the taxpayer as obama would have us believe) giving money to the oil companies, It is simply allowing the oil companies to keep more of the money they made. Not in any way shape or form are the taxpayers and the government paying the oil companies.
no, it is not, Me getting to keep my own money that i earned is not being funded by the government. I really do not understand how people do not understand this.
example, if said company that is tax exempt doesnt make any money, the government is not going to give them money are they? no! so can we please stop saying that tax exemption are government funding, because it is simply being able to keep your own money and not give your money to the government. It is only funding if we are under the belief that we never own our own money, and we are only at the will of the government.
I disagree, I have an issue with the government having something small, say 1%-15% and thinking it can tell you what you are going to do. In so many parts of life, you need some form of government interaction or "funding", therefore, unless the government is the majority funder, I do not believe it should have anymore say. Prime example, the gov just told GM that it cannot pay its CEOs as much money next year as they did this year, 2 of them have already quit.
if this person is going to break into your house, your castle, you dont know what kind of person he is, I am going to assume hes not bringing me flowers. It is not his home, he is putting your life at risk, his life should be at risk as well
for now, There were talks a while ago of integrating IOS with OSX or something along those lines, you can see it start with the mac store, , perhaps, M$ actually beat apple to the punch on something? (something no one is really asking for anyway)
where did I make a distinction one way or the other on which side I believe is right? using the jammer or not using the jammer, I simply pointed out that 30 years ago, we didnt have cell phones. I do like how everybody ASSUMED that I would be for jamming the signal, but you would be wrong, That is just as big a dick thing to do
in the end, Using technology that involves sound for self reasons in a public, confined area is just a dick thing to do
Slashdot Mirror
is that DHS is asking them to allow the people to stay, but (typical /. fashion didnt RTFA) 1 how did DHS know that they were being attacked unless the companies told dhs, or dhs was already monitoring said companies to begin with.
we have this thing called the internet, im sure if you look REALLY REALLY hard you can find the specs, there is this site, called http://www.google.com/ , check it out
who moded this crap insightful?
and they also give out a lot of services, free of cost to the community, its a one hand washes the other situation. not all of them mind you, we have abusers as we always will, but the majority of them do way more for my community than my government does and im not a religious person
not troll, the point was zimmerman is hispanic....
or hispanic
do you donate to charity? if you do than you get to write that off on your taxes, that is a subsidy as well by your logic.
because when you believe that, you are no longer free, you are a slave to the state
the gov doesnt "give" money to the church, they simply dont collect a tax from them, Its quite a stretch to claim that not collecting a tax is somehow the gov giving them money
but if they dont make money, there is no subsidy, because a subsidy is not the government (or the taxpayer as obama would have us believe) giving money to the oil companies, It is simply allowing the oil companies to keep more of the money they made. Not in any way shape or form are the taxpayers and the government paying the oil companies.
no, it is not, Me getting to keep my own money that i earned is not being funded by the government. I really do not understand how people do not understand this.
example, if said company that is tax exempt doesnt make any money, the government is not going to give them money are they? no! so can we please stop saying that tax exemption are government funding, because it is simply being able to keep your own money and not give your money to the government. It is only funding if we are under the belief that we never own our own money, and we are only at the will of the government.
I disagree, I have an issue with the government having something small, say 1%-15% and thinking it can tell you what you are going to do. In so many parts of life, you need some form of government interaction or "funding", therefore, unless the government is the majority funder, I do not believe it should have anymore say. Prime example, the gov just told GM that it cannot pay its CEOs as much money next year as they did this year, 2 of them have already quit.
continues
if this person is going to break into your house, your castle, you dont know what kind of person he is, I am going to assume hes not bringing me flowers. It is not his home, he is putting your life at risk, his life should be at risk as well
I dont, you dont wanna pay the price dont break into my house
i dont know about you, but i consider someone breaking into my house trying to rob me a tyrant
yeah...that has nothing to do with why we are "poor" i tell you what id rather be "poor" in america than rich in about 95% of the rest of the world
look up the difference in states where carry permits are easy to get (or not needed) vs those where they are, that will give you a better idea
(heres a hint, if i am in a carry state, im less likely to get shot statistically)
pirating an entire encyclopedia back in 1994 was not easy, even finding information for many many americans was not easy back in 94
Try reading the studies and not the reporting of them. The smoke is the cause, not the cannabis. That is common sense. Bake or vape and that goes away
for now, There were talks a while ago of integrating IOS with OSX or something along those lines, you can see it start with the mac store, , perhaps, M$ actually beat apple to the punch on something? (something no one is really asking for anyway)
why would that be interesting other than the fact that cannabis is known to help slow the groth of many forms of cancer?
how many ounces in a full LoC?? I mean, thats a big building
for argument sake, Hasnt coke and pepsi been around for about 100 years?
also hasnt the avg life expenctancy gone up dramatically in the past 100 years?
Therefore, I conclude that coke and pepsi have been keeping people alive longer!, thank you, where is my grant check?
really? a windows user with an iPhone would have all their contacts synced with the iPhone?
where did I make a distinction one way or the other on which side I believe is right? using the jammer or not using the jammer, I simply pointed out that 30 years ago, we didnt have cell phones. I do like how everybody ASSUMED that I would be for jamming the signal, but you would be wrong, That is just as big a dick thing to do
in the end, Using technology that involves sound for self reasons in a public, confined area is just a dick thing to do