for once i agree with a handout, leaded gas is blamed for the uptick in crime before unleaded gas came around. i dont know enough about the subject but if true the last thing we want is a town full of angry poor people
curious to those who decided this was worth voting down, is it because the dealer asked him not to? because thats just silly. im talking about what he SHOULD have done regardless of what anyone else says.
fair enough points i thought you were trying to use the other numbers anti gun people love to use.
as far as posting "firearm related death" i think the more important number is where it lines up with total number of death. , IMO 3 out of 100K (without knowing if its an innocent victim or 2 gangbangers no less) is a number I and many americans are comfortable with. And by that I dont mean we celebrate the number, but that the number is still on the decline while gun ownership has done nothing but go up.
Does it really matter if someone kills you with a gun or a knife? in the end you are still dead
in other words, the agreement has no legs to stand on, and never would, so it was as i said, nothing but an excuse for rich people to go on vacation on the taxpayers dime
calling someone a shill doesnt do anything but make you look like the dumb one IMO. if what he said was SO out of park, it should be easy to show it instead of resorting to ad hom.
some citations are better than none, and if thats true, debate the info, not the source. calling someone a liar, without any context whatsoever is utterly useless
lets change fire to having a bbq and the smoke from the grill floats over. Say the neighbor doesnt partake in meat products, are you saying your neighbor has a right to complain and stop me from grilling? im not sure i follow here
Slashdot Mirror
is anything???
for once i agree with a handout, leaded gas is blamed for the uptick in crime before unleaded gas came around. i dont know enough about the subject but if true the last thing we want is a town full of angry poor people
curious to those who decided this was worth voting down, is it because the dealer asked him not to? because thats just silly. im talking about what he SHOULD have done regardless of what anyone else says.
this is slashdot... do you have to ask?
if you sell something as is, how can you complain about what the person does with it afterwards?
guy should have taken the stuff off the truck before selling it if he didnt want someone else driving a truck with his logos on it
having said that, how did they end up there???
fair enough points i thought you were trying to use the other numbers anti gun people love to use.
as far as posting "firearm related death" i think the more important number is where it lines up with total number of death. , IMO 3 out of 100K (without knowing if its an innocent victim or 2 gangbangers no less) is a number I and many americans are comfortable with. And by that I dont mean we celebrate the number, but that the number is still on the decline while gun ownership has done nothing but go up.
Does it really matter if someone kills you with a gun or a knife? in the end you are still dead
true, im just pointing out that this entire thing was a complete waste of time and tax payer money.
or the location its being downloaded from
it is pretty funny out of context, but within context this is one more example of over regulations pushing business overseas
i pay for 100 down, i generally see 120 down in the NYC burbs on ethernet
its still nature whether or no we contribute to the outcome or not
in other words, the agreement has no legs to stand on, and never would, so it was as i said, nothing but an excuse for rich people to go on vacation on the taxpayers dime
im a responsible muslim, i didnt blow up anyone...
see how that works???
there are laws in place for that.
problem with that argument is in the US they count suicides, in the UK they do not.
2/3rds of the homicides are suicides (give or take) therefore the numbers are much much closer than your statistic shows.
because.... muh feelz?
if they are that bad, they should be easy to tear down. not as easy as calling out a strawman or an ad hom, but easy none the less
i didnt say it was a good argument lol
calling someone a shill doesnt do anything but make you look like the dumb one IMO. if what he said was SO out of park, it should be easy to show it instead of resorting to ad hom.
some citations are better than none, and if thats true, debate the info, not the source. calling someone a liar, without any context whatsoever is utterly useless
You mean we are going to ban ALL of symantecs root certs because of a few bad apples??? ;)
lets change fire to having a bbq and the smoke from the grill floats over. Say the neighbor doesnt partake in meat products, are you saying your neighbor has a right to complain and stop me from grilling? im not sure i follow here
id say boston bombing was the biggest since 9/11
true but where is the line drawn?
If i am having a fire on my property and some smoke goes over to your yard, is it now no longer "private"??
would you care to debate the argument he made??? or simply call him names
with all your citations it is clear that you are correct... oh wait