Then quite honestly, I'd say you have better things to be doing with the remainder of your life than bitching about why you can't use Nintendo's newest controller....
This is clearly off-topic, however I brush my teeth 4 times a year, maybe less.
My dentist tells me all my teeth will fall out when I get older, and she's probably right, but it's surprisingly easy to stop once you're out of the habit...one less trip to make before going to bed and before leaving the house in the morning.
And for the record I never had any cavities while I was brushing my teeth regularly, and I haven't gotten any since I stopped (5+ years now).
I realize this and I don't have a problem with it (well, mostly cuz I couldn't care less about Halo), I'd just be surprised if they market Halo 3 for the 360 before or during marketting Halo 2 for Vista.
With the news that Halo 2 is going to be the flagship game for vista I would be surprised to see Halo 3 before Vista is released. And the way things are looking, that will be significantly after the PS3 is released.
I can't imagine Microsoft wanting to remind PC gamers just how OLD Halo 2 is...it needs to appear to be 'sexy' and 'new' for the Vista release, not 2+ years old with a sequel already out...
Call me paranoid, but this sounds like a small part of Microsoft's overall strategy to move from single-purchase to subscription based software. Give it a couple decades, but I'm sure that ideally they want consumers to be paying a monthly fee for Office, Windows, etc.
This just sounds like another cog in that giant machine...
My thoughts exactly. Halo 2 was released for xbox in what, november 2004? Assuming Vista isn't released until the end of this year (and that's being generous) Halo 2 will be at LEAST 2 years old, if not older. I've played it on my friend's Xbox, and it's hardly unique. Seems like a weak product to act as a 'flagship.'
Then quite honestly, I'd say you have better things to be doing with the remainder of your life than bitching about why you can't use Nintendo's newest controller....
This is clearly off-topic, however I brush my teeth 4 times a year, maybe less.
My dentist tells me all my teeth will fall out when I get older, and she's probably right, but it's surprisingly easy to stop once you're out of the habit...one less trip to make before going to bed and before leaving the house in the morning.
And for the record I never had any cavities while I was brushing my teeth regularly, and I haven't gotten any since I stopped (5+ years now).
Hmmmm....you make good points.
I realize this and I don't have a problem with it (well, mostly cuz I couldn't care less about Halo), I'd just be surprised if they market Halo 3 for the 360 before or during marketting Halo 2 for Vista.
HALO 3 anybody?
With the news that Halo 2 is going to be the flagship game for vista I would be surprised to see Halo 3 before Vista is released. And the way things are looking, that will be significantly after the PS3 is released.
I can't imagine Microsoft wanting to remind PC gamers just how OLD Halo 2 is...it needs to appear to be 'sexy' and 'new' for the Vista release, not 2+ years old with a sequel already out...
Turn and face Canada...
Depending on how far south he is from, it may already be a lost cause...
Call me paranoid, but this sounds like a small part of Microsoft's overall strategy to move from single-purchase to subscription based software. Give it a couple decades, but I'm sure that ideally they want consumers to be paying a monthly fee for Office, Windows, etc. This just sounds like another cog in that giant machine...
My thoughts exactly. Halo 2 was released for xbox in what, november 2004? Assuming Vista isn't released until the end of this year (and that's being generous) Halo 2 will be at LEAST 2 years old, if not older. I've played it on my friend's Xbox, and it's hardly unique. Seems like a weak product to act as a 'flagship.'