You're right about the generation thing. However the amount of misconception about what evolution is in replies to this story (as evidenced by your post) is astounding.
Of course the network representing the structure of the universe is astronomically huge – in fact it can be infinite. But even if it is finite, researchers’ best guess is that it is no smaller than 10250 atoms of space and time.
The internet has not only made the world a smaller place, but the entire universe.
I did some analysis (too advanced and secret for me to disclose) and came up with this. Needless to say it's almost an exact match for his photo in the article. No wonder he's not disclosing his 0-day.
I am honoured that I have been moderated as a troll, but this isn't really a troll. Troll comments are much more subtle. I guess nearly everyone has forgotten what an internet troll really is, so it's no surprise really.
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
Before some idiot monkey savant comes along and says that would require infinite time, just remember that the researchers implanted stuff into the monkeys, thus reducing the time required. Additionally, the researchers demonstrators demonstrated their expectationally high performance when it comes to implanting stuff into the monkeys. They did it for years before their willies fell off. Dedication. That's what's missing from most of the youth of today: dedication. I commend these researchers. Not only did they keep repeating the impregnation procedure, but they did it for years!
Shit. I am logged in. Ok, which monkey has the cookie? C'mon. Own up... I will free willie if you do. Willie for cookie. Please?
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
Before some idiot monkey savant comes along and says that would require infinite time, just remember that the researchers implanted stuff into the monkeys, thus reducing the time required. Additionally, the researchers demonstrators demonstrated their expectationally high performance when it comes to implanting stuff into the monkeys. They did it for years before their willies fell off. Dedication. That's what's missing from most of the youth of today: dedication. I commend these researchers. Not only did they keep repeating the impregnation procedure, but they did it for years!
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
Status: Current Release: For general public Copyright: (C) 2012, McDaffy Duck incorporated, All Rights Reserved (R) Approved by: Timothy
Introduction
Today McDaffy -- a leading anti-virus/malware/knowledge vendor -- made a startling discovery. Researchers at McDaffy for months have been toiling over and reverse engineering code from myriad sources (although the source was not available.) McDaffy is disclosing this information in the interests of honest disclosure. Severe security flaws are found on Personal Computers and PCs.
Background and Terminology
Beginning in early 1986 McDaffy researchers began exploring the possibility of running arbitrary code on arbitrary hardware where not only was the "root password" was known but the hardware was directly available and accessible. After 26 years of careful research a talented intern hit upon the jackpot. Through a cunning combination of access to hardware, an open operating system, and 15 M&Ms he was able to inject carefully crafted code into the colonel.
Colonel: The heart of a computer CPU: Cologne Prince(poofter) Unit
Once the intern had impregnated the colonel with the tainted DNA (code) he had unimaginable access to the system. The colonel directs all orders of the computer. Orders of the user, I mean. Or something. Anyway this injection of sperm allowed the intern unimaginable power. He had zero day access!
Zero day access: The time it takes to impregnate a colonel; in this case zero days
Results
The code was injected from the host (the intern) into the target. Target is a technical term for the colonel. This took 0-days (hence the term). The intern then inserted his CD into the Drive (CD = Crusty Doodle; Drive = Penis... err, or Vagina). Upon injection the Vagina immediately seized up, causing a terminal crash. Quickly removing the CD and inserting his USB (Unsatisfactory Satisfying Boobies, I see Boobies) into the vegena the intern immediately had rooted the thingy. And he was happy.
I'm confused, is this different from non-competes? I thought non-competes where standard practice in a lot of area's of business. Sorry for my ignorance
I've done some more careful analysis and this is truly incredible. If you add the height of each Giza pyramid, convert the image to greyscale with each pixel having a value of 0-0xffff, add those values to the original image, mask with 0xffff, rotate by the circumference of the Great Pyramid, project the 2d greyscale image to 3D with an eye distance of -1 you get this. No joke.
Now that I look at it more I can find even further flaws in your theory that that are not footprints. If you zoom in, magnify and apply 24 Laplace transforms (not enough room here to write them out completely), rotate 5 degrees, shift each pixel using a polar function, rotate -5 degrees, zoom, sharpen, smooth, stretch horizontally 314 pixels, rotate 1.618 degrees, add the height Mt Everest and subtract 15 before finally passing it through a modified Bresenham circle algorithm you can clearly see the thread. The threads are clearly from a shoe... not your so called "little trenches".
Why not have physical buttons displayed down the left (or right, or top, or wherever makes sense) that correspond to the location of the screen next to them?
Not sure if serious or meant to be sarcastic, or...? You're not allowed to use ?: and you're not allowed to use else? How do you specify an "else" if you cannot use the else keyword nor the ?: operator? The other styles you suggest are pretty crazy as well, but not as crazy as not using else in any way shape or form. Why should a function not be over 40 lines long? That's like saying a paragraph must never exceed three sentences. I can think of plenty of examples where a function would appropriately be over 40 lines long.
Slashdot Mirror
You're right about the generation thing. However the amount of misconception about what evolution is in replies to this story (as evidenced by your post) is astounding.
From the article:
Of course the network representing the structure of the universe is astronomically huge – in fact it can be infinite. But even if it is finite, researchers’ best guess is that it is no smaller than 10250 atoms of space and time.
The internet has not only made the world a smaller place, but the entire universe.
If he gives this lecture and somebody watching figures out how it works, then that somebody else could claim the bounty.
I just wish I was going to the conference. The lecture is sure to be fun.
I did some analysis (too advanced and secret for me to disclose) and came up with this. Needless to say it's almost an exact match for his photo in the article. No wonder he's not disclosing his 0-day.
Who modded this offtopic? It's not offtopic because it was the security researcher posting.
Although I can play it with the c64 emulator.
I am honoured that I have been moderated as a troll, but this isn't really a troll. Troll comments are much more subtle. I guess nearly everyone has forgotten what an internet troll really is, so it's no surprise really.
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
Before some idiot monkey savant comes along and says that would require infinite time, just remember that the researchers implanted stuff into the monkeys, thus reducing the time required. Additionally, the researchers demonstrators demonstrated their expectationally high performance when it comes to implanting stuff into the monkeys. They did it for years before their willies fell off. Dedication. That's what's missing from most of the youth of today: dedication. I commend these researchers. Not only did they keep repeating the impregnation procedure, but they did it for years!
Shit. I am logged in. Ok, which monkey has the cookie? C'mon. Own up... I will free willie if you do. Willie for cookie. Please?
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
Before some idiot monkey savant comes along and says that would require infinite time, just remember that the researchers implanted stuff into the monkeys, thus reducing the time required. Additionally, the researchers demonstrators demonstrated their expectationally high performance when it comes to implanting stuff into the monkeys. They did it for years before their willies fell off. Dedication. That's what's missing from most of the youth of today: dedication. I commend these researchers. Not only did they keep repeating the impregnation procedure, but they did it for years!
Using this algorithm, we demonstrate repeatable high performance for years after implantation in two monkeys, thereby increasing the clinical viability of neural prostheses
Two monkeys! Read that again. Slowly. Sound it out. T W O. Tee Double You Oh. Ok, that doesn't make sense. Just read it as two monkeys. Or, is that two monkey. But in case you missed it 2 monkeys have been implanted and this increases the viability. Such a sample size is incredible, really. This is shattering. Just think what a million monkeys could do! Probably write some arbitrary text... such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Just the thought is humbling.
bite? nibble? I see what you did there.
MEDIA RELEASE
Status: Current
Release: For general public
Copyright: (C) 2012, McDaffy Duck incorporated, All Rights Reserved (R)
Approved by: Timothy
Introduction
Today McDaffy -- a leading anti-virus/malware/knowledge vendor -- made a startling discovery. Researchers at McDaffy for months have been toiling over and reverse engineering code from myriad sources (although the source was not available.) McDaffy is disclosing this information in the interests of honest disclosure. Severe security flaws are found on Personal Computers and PCs.
Background and Terminology
Beginning in early 1986 McDaffy researchers began exploring the possibility of running arbitrary code on arbitrary hardware where not only was the "root password" was known but the hardware was directly available and accessible. After 26 years of careful research a talented intern hit upon the jackpot. Through a cunning combination of access to hardware, an open operating system, and 15 M&Ms he was able to inject carefully crafted code into the colonel.
Colonel: The heart of a computer
CPU: Cologne Prince(poofter) Unit
Once the intern had impregnated the colonel with the tainted DNA (code) he had unimaginable access to the system. The colonel directs all orders of the computer. Orders of the user, I mean. Or something. Anyway this injection of sperm allowed the intern unimaginable power. He had zero day access!
Zero day access: The time it takes to impregnate a colonel; in this case zero days
Results
The code was injected from the host (the intern) into the target. Target is a technical term for the colonel. This took 0-days (hence the term). The intern then inserted his CD into the Drive (CD = Crusty Doodle; Drive = Penis... err, or Vagina). Upon injection the Vagina immediately seized up, causing a terminal crash. Quickly removing the CD and inserting his USB (Unsatisfactory Satisfying Boobies, I see Boobies) into the vegena the intern immediately had rooted the thingy. And he was happy.
Isn't this supposed to be dead easy?
It's not news. Clueless journalist and an even more clueless Timothy for accepting this as a story. But, hey, what else should we expect?
I'm confused, is this different from non-competes? I thought non-competes where standard practice in a lot of area's of business. Sorry for my ignorance
And non-competes are generally illegal as well.
Hold the fort!
I've done some more careful analysis and this is truly incredible. If you add the height of each Giza pyramid, convert the image to greyscale with each pixel having a value of 0-0xffff, add those values to the original image, mask with 0xffff, rotate by the circumference of the Great Pyramid, project the 2d greyscale image to 3D with an eye distance of -1 you get this. No joke.
Now that I look at it more I can find even further flaws in your theory that that are not footprints. If you zoom in, magnify and apply 24 Laplace transforms (not enough room here to write them out completely), rotate 5 degrees, shift each pixel using a polar function, rotate -5 degrees, zoom, sharpen, smooth, stretch horizontally 314 pixels, rotate 1.618 degrees, add the height Mt Everest and subtract 15 before finally passing it through a modified Bresenham circle algorithm you can clearly see the thread. The threads are clearly from a shoe... not your so called "little trenches".
Those are the little trenches where it was scooping soil samples.
Hand in your conspiracy theorist badge. Now. They can be nothing but footprints. Little trenches from scooping soil samples... hilarious.
Why not have physical buttons displayed down the left (or right, or top, or wherever makes sense) that correspond to the location of the screen next to them?
Actually, that should be "all your data is belong to us".
Since when does having a mustache enough for one to be considered "bearded". As a bearded man myself I'm offended. lol
I noticed that as well and the only reasonable conclusion is that the rest of his beard is invisible.
Looks more like pressed tin
Hmm. You might be right. Perhaps he added that as a comfort feature so that he could remove his tinfoil hat when indoors.
I love the carpet on his ceiling. Not sure how easy it is to vacuum though. Also, have I seen that guy in a movie somewhere?
Kinda beautiful as well.
Not sure if serious or meant to be sarcastic, or...? You're not allowed to use ?: and you're not allowed to use else? How do you specify an "else" if you cannot use the else keyword nor the ?: operator? The other styles you suggest are pretty crazy as well, but not as crazy as not using else in any way shape or form. Why should a function not be over 40 lines long? That's like saying a paragraph must never exceed three sentences. I can think of plenty of examples where a function would appropriately be over 40 lines long.
Where the hell is Span?
It is country named by scientist. In fact, scientist was the same as culprit.