the closed-circuit picture-snapping doesnt even matter. It's just a case of: for every razor picked off a shelf, one is also purchased. The CCsnapping is only important on the shelf-end. You are an idiot.
Then please, criticise my punctuation- an aspect completely unrelated to capitalization.
and why the fuck would I bother giving you two seperate insults? Guess what, geniusoid: it wasnt repetition, and you're a fucking moron. It was one, single insult, which had a comma in it. You must have been shit to be around in preschool- "Moo? What's with the repitition? Couldnt come up with another letter? Why not 'Mao'? Huh?" fucking idiot...
Ah, what you have is a confusion between "story" and "book" 90% of the book is nice builds about 10% of the story, the rest is a hasty explanation thrown in at the end. Read the 2nd [or 3rd.. not sure..] to last chapter in book 4, it's nothing but one long block of somebody talking under influence of truth-serum for fuck's sake -- it would be cliche if it wasnt so fucking stupid that nobody else has bothered with it.
this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful
well that part begining with "stick" was the entire point of the post.. do you not notice it? Did you not read the end of book three or four? and you're a twit, book three kicked the ass of two
Where's my fucking prize? Oh right, you're a fucking idiot and your subject was the stupidest thing I ever read, does that count as "getting it", or not?
You're on the fifth book and you haven't yet noticed that JKR is utterly suck about endings? [nice build] [enjoyable scene] [good build] [great build] [climax] [stick a huge 7-page block of one person talking to explain everything else because the book is already twice as long as the last book and hasnt yet bothered with those "nice build"s for 90% of the story]
if they didnt bother to divide the books by year, it could be better for multiple reasons. The end of year four and the beginning of year five are linked enough that they should be together, not this bullshit. Then book 5 could have gone on longer and wouldnt need to resort to these fucking "explanation chapters" Book 4 was definatly worse in that department, and book 5 was enjoyable when you ignore the end.
now.. go reasearch Tom Bearden, and read everything you can about him. Absolutely everything. Don't stop for a moment, and dont stop until you're done.
[This is lord bitman, it's giving me some error about moderations.. but I've had no mod points for several weeks, so no idea what it's talking about] I'm sorry, but if you somehow think that's acceptable, you just suck. Preserving formatting when it is needed is good, but preserving ALL formatting [including margins] when it is not needed, is bad. Now I'm not entirely against margins. I think that there are quite a few idiots who need to learn to use margins on web pages. But margins are the least important thing which needs to be preserved when viewing a page on a screen. Format preservation is also, in general, over-rated. There are some instances where you absoluely need the format to look like it did to the other guy- if it were "Acrobat Printer" it would make sense. But it's "Acrobat Reader", so I dont want format preservation any more than slightly higher than can be seen on the web. I dont have a small screen, as another suggested, I have a decent-sized screen, and my options are either small window with barely any text in it, or large window with the same amount of text in it and 4" of useless whitespace. It's a fucking computer monitor, god damnit. "Continuous" does nothing, I want a "Don't preserve so much formatting, you fucking nazi" button. What we need is a nice open standard which can preserve formatting when it's needed, and not preserve it any other time. [summary: if you still only see one page at a time even with continuous because there's so much margin, Adobe still sucks]
using rfid in warehouses to track bulk shipments can in no way be seen as a bad thing, got that? Figure it out: you're complaining about unique identification, and putting a sticker outside a box which is later opened and discarded before the end user even sees it on a shelf cannot possibly be seen as uniquely identifying you.
any word yet on a PDF viewer that isnt the poorest possible implimentation of a document viewer ever? "Let's take something that doesnt have pages, okay now, stay with me, and... pretend that it has pages, making the entire thing be a strain to read"
It's a fucking computer screen, yet I've never seen a viewer that doesnt handle each page as if it were being displayed on paper. Bullshit. Am I the only one who likes to be reading MORE THAN ONE PAGE AT A TIME? YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU CAN WITH A FUCKING BOOK OR PRINTOUT? Fucking nazi peice of shit.
Maybe I should wait until I'm not so tired, but at the moment, I'm bored, so here goes: There is a mixture between truth, lies, insight, and just being an ass. The purpose of this mixture is to show that there are no
absolutes in anything- this thread, for example, you assumed to be either all serious from a fool, or all trolling. What you havent
realized is that something can hold contradictory absolutes, that it can be, for example, completely in favor of one view with no
contradictions, while also being in complete favor of another view the same way (depending on what you are thinking of when you read
it) This thread has been both an attempt to enlighten you, and an attempt to entertain. These can co-exist easily, despite cancelling
eachother out. It's no secret that I'm not the best at communicating ideas, a look at my web page would have shown that well enough. I
try, I'm just not good at it yet. That's why I dont expect you to understand this post, and it's why I didnt expect you to be able to
understand other things, for the most part. So I use what I have- I try to, instead of comminicating an idea, just get someone else to think about another way of looking at
something, and since a certain way seems obvious to me, I figure that it can't be too long that, were someone actually trying to think
of a new way to look at something, they may stumble accross it. (The 'FUCKING IDIOT' lines were mostly for entertainment, though I do
still hold that opinion of you)
Now, I do insist that I was never trying to rile you up. It's precisely because you think that I am that this is so effective. When
you saw my other posts, did you look at the replies? I assume you did. You may, but may not have noticed that my first message tends
to take a different tone from my next messages. The first messages are usually just 'test messages', trying to get a reply, any reply
at all, just to see if the person is listening. (I don't want to type out a lengthy explanation of things and have no one read it).
The trouble with this thread is that once you replied, there was not much more that I could communicate to you. (of course, two
usernames posting didnt help the matter, I had to send out two more test messages in order to determine that you were more or less the
same person).
Now, I'm having doubts that you'll actually read this, and many that you'll believe that first word of it (more awake now), so I'll stop here and see what you have to say in a reply. Since I just went and explained it already, I dont know if I'll respond. You were just too stupid to have any fun with. I was trying to string you along but you never showed a sign that you'd gotten the first clue.
1st) NO FUCKING SHIT, YOU MORON. The PROBLEM is that you still havent got a clue what I'm trying at. 2nd) You foolishly think that enlightenment is an absolute. There are no absolutes. In the subject of this particular thread, I have a more enlightened view than you. That's as far as it goes in either direction. 3rd) Why the FUCK do you think you're so fucking important that everything I tell you is supposed to 'bother' you? This isnt about BOTHERING you, you fuckwit. If you're important enough that bothering you would be an accomplishment, I am not aware of it, so bothering you is not the intent here. YOU FUCKING IDIOT. 4th)Please reject them somewhere other than only in your head. That is, explain your rejections, much as you are doing now for this particular post. 5th)I have no idea where this one even came from. True enough that I was at first attempting to get you to see your faults for yourself, giving as few hints as possible so that you came to it more or less on your own, but I think the point where I gave up on that is pretty clear, and since then the conversation has seemed quite unbalanced on the opposite end. 6th)I dont think that I have, anywhere throughout this post, implied that I am not black. 7th) If only you knew the real purpose of this thread, you would see them. Yes, I did say those things to make you second-guess yourself, but take a first guess at this what: You haven't yet made that second guess. I dont expect you to get it in only two tries, but it would be a start. So far, I've only seen one guess, and you're way off (though right on target for the obvious and incorrect answer)
The point is not something for me to show, but for you to find, you fucking idiot.
You are a fucking idiot, and have no idea about the path to enlightenment, and nothing but incorrect ideas about this thread. You 'wink' about my supposed entertainment, thinking that this INCREDIBLE INSIGHT is supposed to show how mentally adept you are. What it shows, however, is that you are completely ignorant and unwilling to even TRY to accept an enlightened view. YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Know this, understand this, AND READ MY FUCKING EXPLANATIONS ALREADY. If you want to insult me, READ WHAT I WRITE. I Know that there is plenty of fodder there, BUT YOU HAVENT TOUCHED ANY OF IT. I place it there so that I know if the insults I get are from FUCKING IDIOTS or from people who actually bother to maybe take five seconds of time out of their day and READ what they are replying to, instead of typing based on false assumptions made before the conversation began. Don't just reply, RESPOND.
Slashdot Mirror
the closed-circuit picture-snapping doesnt even matter. It's just a case of: for every razor picked off a shelf, one is also purchased. The CCsnapping is only important on the shelf-end. You are an idiot.
You dont understand the terminator movies- it blows your head off because you will eventually set the high score.
Then please, criticise my punctuation- an aspect completely unrelated to capitalization.
and why the fuck would I bother giving you two seperate insults? Guess what, geniusoid: it wasnt repetition, and you're a fucking moron. It was one, single insult, which had a comma in it.
You must have been shit to be around in preschool- "Moo? What's with the repitition? Couldnt come up with another letter? Why not 'Mao'? Huh?"
fucking idiot...
how the fuck is that in any way relevant? You're a fucking moron, you fucking moron.
Ah, what you have is a confusion between "story" and "book"
90% of the book is nice builds about 10% of the story, the rest is a hasty explanation thrown in at the end. Read the 2nd [or 3rd.. not sure..] to last chapter in book 4, it's nothing but one long block of somebody talking under influence of truth-serum for fuck's sake -- it would be cliche if it wasnt so fucking stupid that nobody else has bothered with it.
I SAID it was INSIGHTFUL
OMFGYOUARESOSMARTLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLIT SLIKEYOUCANREADORSOMETHINGYOUFUCKINGMORONDIE
this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful, this post is insightful
because "an" is used for ease of flow in speech when the word after it begins with a vowel, that's why.
And B-Wing and E-Wing don't look like B and E! And the Death-Star looks like a moon!
well that part begining with "stick" was the entire point of the post.. do you not notice it? Did you not read the end of book three or four?
and you're a twit, book three kicked the ass of two
Where's my fucking prize?
Oh right, you're a fucking idiot and your subject was the stupidest thing I ever read, does that count as "getting it", or not?
You're on the fifth book and you haven't yet noticed that JKR is utterly suck about endings?
[nice build] [enjoyable scene] [good build] [great build] [climax] [stick a huge 7-page block of one person talking to explain everything else because the book is already twice as long as the last book and hasnt yet bothered with those "nice build"s for 90% of the story]
if they didnt bother to divide the books by year, it could be better for multiple reasons. The end of year four and the beginning of year five are linked enough that they should be together, not this bullshit. Then book 5 could have gone on longer and wouldnt need to resort to these fucking "explanation chapters"
Book 4 was definatly worse in that department, and book 5 was enjoyable when you ignore the end.
his theories on EM feilds are the least interesting thing about him. His being completely nuts, that's the fun part.
now.. go reasearch Tom Bearden, and read everything you can about him. Absolutely everything. Don't stop for a moment, and dont stop until you're done.
it was, what, a day that passed between posts?
I have never met a goldfish that could type. Unless you've been watching "memento" a lot
> Dude, can ya watchin your posts
"My programming is insufficient to allow me to perform that task."
can do for watch fack jew bongy YOU FUCKER?
woops, several hours later, just pasted that from a .txt... obviously I managed to do it while logged-in, so ignore that top line
[This is lord bitman, it's giving me some error about moderations.. but I've had no mod points for several weeks, so no idea what it's talking about]
I'm sorry, but if you somehow think that's acceptable, you just suck. Preserving formatting when it is needed is good, but preserving ALL formatting [including margins] when it is not needed, is bad. Now I'm not entirely against margins. I think that there are quite a few idiots who need to learn to use margins on web pages. But margins are the least important thing which needs to be preserved when viewing a page on a screen. Format preservation is also, in general, over-rated. There are some instances where you absoluely need the format to look like it did to the other guy- if it were "Acrobat Printer" it would make sense. But it's "Acrobat Reader", so I dont want format preservation any more than slightly higher than can be seen on the web.
I dont have a small screen, as another suggested, I have a decent-sized screen, and my options are either small window with barely any text in it, or large window with the same amount of text in it and 4" of useless whitespace.
It's a fucking computer monitor, god damnit. "Continuous" does nothing, I want a "Don't preserve so much formatting, you fucking nazi" button. What we need is a nice open standard which can preserve formatting when it's needed, and not preserve it any other time.
[summary: if you still only see one page at a time even with continuous because there's so much margin, Adobe still sucks]
using rfid in warehouses to track bulk shipments can in no way be seen as a bad thing, got that? Figure it out:
you're complaining about unique identification, and putting a sticker outside a box which is later opened and discarded before the end user even sees it on a shelf cannot possibly be seen as uniquely identifying you.
any word yet on a PDF viewer that isnt the poorest possible implimentation of a document viewer ever?
"Let's take something that doesnt have pages, okay now, stay with me, and... pretend that it has pages, making the entire thing be a strain to read"
It's a fucking computer screen, yet I've never seen a viewer that doesnt handle each page as if it were being displayed on paper. Bullshit. Am I the only one who likes to be reading MORE THAN ONE PAGE AT A TIME? YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU CAN WITH A FUCKING BOOK OR PRINTOUT?
Fucking nazi peice of shit.
Maybe I should wait until I'm not so tired, but at the moment, I'm bored, so here goes:
There is a mixture between truth, lies, insight, and just being an ass. The purpose of this mixture is to show that there are no
absolutes in anything- this thread, for example, you assumed to be either all serious from a fool, or all trolling. What you havent
realized is that something can hold contradictory absolutes, that it can be, for example, completely in favor of one view with no
contradictions, while also being in complete favor of another view the same way (depending on what you are thinking of when you read
it)
This thread has been both an attempt to enlighten you, and an attempt to entertain. These can co-exist easily, despite cancelling
eachother out. It's no secret that I'm not the best at communicating ideas, a look at my web page would have shown that well enough. I
try, I'm just not good at it yet. That's why I dont expect you to understand this post, and it's why I didnt expect you to be able to
understand other things, for the most part.
So I use what I have- I try to, instead of comminicating an idea, just get someone else to think about another way of looking at
something, and since a certain way seems obvious to me, I figure that it can't be too long that, were someone actually trying to think
of a new way to look at something, they may stumble accross it. (The 'FUCKING IDIOT' lines were mostly for entertainment, though I do
still hold that opinion of you)
Now, I do insist that I was never trying to rile you up. It's precisely because you think that I am that this is so effective. When
you saw my other posts, did you look at the replies? I assume you did. You may, but may not have noticed that my first message tends
to take a different tone from my next messages. The first messages are usually just 'test messages', trying to get a reply, any reply
at all, just to see if the person is listening. (I don't want to type out a lengthy explanation of things and have no one read it).
The trouble with this thread is that once you replied, there was not much more that I could communicate to you. (of course, two
usernames posting didnt help the matter, I had to send out two more test messages in order to determine that you were more or less the
same person).
Now, I'm having doubts that you'll actually read this, and many that you'll believe that first word of it (more awake now), so I'll stop here and see what you have to say in a reply. Since I just went and explained it already, I dont know if I'll respond. You were just too stupid to have any fun with. I was trying to string you along but you never showed a sign that you'd gotten the first clue.
1st) NO FUCKING SHIT, YOU MORON. The PROBLEM is that you still havent got a clue what I'm trying at.
2nd) You foolishly think that enlightenment is an absolute. There are no absolutes. In the subject of this particular thread, I have a more enlightened view than you. That's as far as it goes in either direction.
3rd) Why the FUCK do you think you're so fucking important that everything I tell you is supposed to 'bother' you? This isnt about BOTHERING you, you fuckwit. If you're important enough that bothering you would be an accomplishment, I am not aware of it, so bothering you is not the intent here. YOU FUCKING IDIOT.
4th)Please reject them somewhere other than only in your head. That is, explain your rejections, much as you are doing now for this particular post.
5th)I have no idea where this one even came from. True enough that I was at first attempting to get you to see your faults for yourself, giving as few hints as possible so that you came to it more or less on your own, but I think the point where I gave up on that is pretty clear, and since then the conversation has seemed quite unbalanced on the opposite end.
6th)I dont think that I have, anywhere throughout this post, implied that I am not black.
7th) If only you knew the real purpose of this thread, you would see them. Yes, I did say those things to make you second-guess yourself, but take a first guess at this what: You haven't yet made that second guess. I dont expect you to get it in only two tries, but it would be a start. So far, I've only seen one guess, and you're way off (though right on target for the obvious and incorrect answer)
The point is not something for me to show, but for you to find, you fucking idiot.
You are a fucking idiot, and have no idea about the path to enlightenment, and nothing but incorrect ideas about this thread. You 'wink' about my supposed entertainment, thinking that this INCREDIBLE INSIGHT is supposed to show how mentally adept you are. What it shows, however, is that you are completely ignorant and unwilling to even TRY to accept an enlightened view. YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Know this, understand this, AND READ MY FUCKING EXPLANATIONS ALREADY. If you want to insult me, READ WHAT I WRITE. I Know that there is plenty of fodder there, BUT YOU HAVENT TOUCHED ANY OF IT. I place it there so that I know if the insults I get are from FUCKING IDIOTS or from people who actually bother to maybe take five seconds of time out of their day and READ what they are replying to, instead of typing based on false assumptions made before the conversation began.
Don't just reply, RESPOND.