It would still get scrambled by changing the packet timing.
The delay would have to be to be statistically significant yet short enough that people wouldn't realize it's there. And anyhow it could be easily tested by connecting the keyboard to an extra keyboard port card. Just have a robot hit two keyboards at a time at equal rates.
Bool. This has nothing to do with that religion you call competition. I don't give a crap about what your average American Idle wanker wants. The net will not be decided by mob rule. Money doesn't make the net work. Design and communication do. How many P2P traders of documentation (like Rebuilding America's Defenses) give a crap about money? Tell me which "competitive" ISP is offering access to that document? Whose stock is going up because of it?
Your confusing the truck (P2P) with the cargo (PNAC's freudian slip). Net neutrality is entirely about the cargo not the truck. You can talk all you want about being the company that provides better P2P service. I agree no regulation. But when you talk about creating a pipe only for certain cargo then you are RESTRICTING the CHOICES people have.
I want access to information. Information is not a service. Transport, presentation, interfaces, and organization are services.
I agree with not regulating how information is offered. I do not agree with opening the door to restricting access by way of flooding the market with crap and hoarding technological resources from others who might want to use them differently.
Taking away net neutrality is regulation. Think about it. Company X says only this and that content may go on that pipe. That's REGULATION. THAT IS ANTI COMPETITION.
Besides the Internet is not made of pipes. It can use any stretch of wire it finds no specific path has to made. I get my emails just fine, maybe they should stop outsourcing tech support at the Senator's office.
Do we really want the equivalent of entire highways only for trucks while the rest of us crawl on the highways? What is it about neo-feudalism that people find so appealing.
Training an operator for a drone also costs much less than training a pilot.
It's really sad that most people can't express why it freaks them out.
It's psychological harrassment and stage props for the war on terror just like the whole phony "should we torture" debate keeps people distracted from the fact that the military teaches its soldiers that torture does not work.
The guys they picked up in Toronto were torured, hence the gag order, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were the ones who delivered the ammonium nitrate in the first place and finally it turns out one of the "perps" was a military officer. The whole thing is a fake terror plot just like the one in London where they raided two homes (the neighbor's first where they beat up the husband in full view of the wife then the reported home where they shot the guy and then blamed the brother for shooting him). And why did they raid the homes? Because of some unreliable source said there was a vest that sprayed poison inside.
A poison vest? IS THE PENGUIN GOING TO FILE A PATENT VIOLATION SUIT SOON? AND WILL THE JOKER BE HIS ATTORNEY? AND WHERE THE HELL IS BATMAN?
Go to answers.com and look up the WTC center bombing of 1993 check out the bit about FBI involvement and the mp3 where Agent Anticev admits to hiring Emad Salem to build the bomb.
Slashdot Mirror
Most Lead Engineers would stop there and assume the duty was fulfilled. He went beyond the call and made it public.
Ok so where do we store enough bits to do this system justice?
well it's about time we have the cell phones already.
It would still get scrambled by changing the packet timing. The delay would have to be to be statistically significant yet short enough that people wouldn't realize it's there. And anyhow it could be easily tested by connecting the keyboard to an extra keyboard port card. Just have a robot hit two keyboards at a time at equal rates.
The only highbrowing going on is the constant pissing contest over CPUs and GPUs.
From Fort Detrick
great soda machine more secure than diebold as if casino machines weren't enough
Bool. This has nothing to do with that religion you call competition. I don't give a crap about what your average American Idle wanker wants. The net will not be decided by mob rule. Money doesn't make the net work. Design and communication do. How many P2P traders of documentation (like Rebuilding America's Defenses) give a crap about money? Tell me which "competitive" ISP is offering access to that document? Whose stock is going up because of it?
Your confusing the truck (P2P) with the cargo (PNAC's freudian slip). Net neutrality is entirely about the cargo not the truck. You can talk all you want about being the company that provides better P2P service. I agree no regulation. But when you talk about creating a pipe only for certain cargo then you are RESTRICTING the CHOICES people have.
I want access to information. Information is not a service. Transport, presentation,
interfaces, and organization are services.
I agree with not regulating how information is offered. I do not agree with opening the door to restricting access by way of flooding the market with crap and hoarding technological resources from others who might want to use them differently.
Taking away net neutrality is regulation. Think about it. Company X says only this and that content may go on that pipe. That's REGULATION. THAT IS ANTI COMPETITION.
Besides the Internet is not made of pipes. It can use any stretch of wire it finds no specific path has to made. I get my emails just fine, maybe they should stop outsourcing tech support at the Senator's office.
Do we really want the equivalent of entire highways only for trucks while the rest of us crawl on the highways? What is it about neo-feudalism that people find so appealing.
Training an operator for a drone also costs much less than training a pilot.
It's really sad that most people can't express why it freaks them out.
It's psychological harrassment and stage props for the war on terror just like the whole phony "should we torture" debate keeps people distracted from the fact that the military teaches its soldiers that torture does not work.
The guys they picked up in Toronto were torured, hence the gag order, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police were the ones who delivered the ammonium nitrate in the first place and finally it turns out one of the "perps" was a military officer. The whole thing is a fake terror plot just like the one in London where they raided two homes (the neighbor's first where they beat up the husband in full view of the wife then the reported home where they shot the guy and then blamed the brother for shooting him). And why did they raid the homes?
Because of some unreliable source said there was a vest that sprayed poison inside.
A poison vest? IS THE PENGUIN GOING TO FILE A PATENT VIOLATION SUIT SOON? AND WILL THE JOKER BE HIS ATTORNEY? AND WHERE THE HELL IS BATMAN?
Go to answers.com and look up the WTC center bombing of 1993 check out the bit about FBI involvement and the mp3 where Agent Anticev admits to hiring Emad Salem to build the bomb.
http://www.myspace.com/alex_infowarrior http://www.infowars.com/articles/science/myspace_t rojan_horse_of_internet_censorship.htm