Slashdot Mirror


Internet Usage Boosts Post Office Revenue

setirw writes "Contrary to popular belief, the New York Times reports that Internet usage has actually boosted the USPS's revenue, instead of decreasing it. It is commonly believed that the rise of the Internet has negatively affected the Postal Service's revenue, since e-mail usage is rapidly superseding snail-mail usage. 'Six years ago, people were pointing at the Internet as the doom and gloom of the Postal Service,' said James Cochrane, manager of USPS package services. However, the widespread usage of e-commerce sites has boosted USPS revenue, since millions of packages are shipped from such sites daily."

140 comments

  1. Who cares? by baldass_newbie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As far as I can tell, with all of the junk mail that comes piling into my mailbox, the USPS ain't going anywhere anytime soon.
    Besides, they more powers and subsidies than any other delivery corporation out there.
    I highly doubt they were scared - considering the quality of service I receive in downtown Philly - job security is not an issue.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:Who cares? by Jack+Action · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I highly doubt they were scared - considering the quality of service I receive in downtown Philly - job security is not an issue.

      Unlike the quality of service one receives when dealing with ecommerce sites on the internet.

      If I had to chose between script-reading or even non-existent ecommerce help, or a surly postal clerk -- bring on the surly 45 year old with the beer gut.

    2. Re:Who cares? by bsy_at_play · · Score: 1

      the usps does not receive funds from congress, so they have "subsidies" only from the philatelists.

      --
      beware syntactic cavities
    3. Re:Who cares? by expressionist · · Score: 1

      Content (books, movies, etc) shipments through snail mail will decrease. Hardware will stabilize after the major Vista upgrade. Now they should target essentially-physical things. From the amount of spam I get, it seems viagra does very well. We all need some! That's their killer product: imagine the huge extra amount of porn that could be consumed. They could start an special express service: the quick viagra postmen. Or the pornoviagrapostmen, if they want a german ring to it. And they need a new suitable logo, of course. Think about it, USPS.

    4. Re:Who cares? by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      Some consider tax exemption as well (as other legal breaks/privileges) to be subsidies.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly: the USPS is an arm of government. Their bottom line revenue is not determined by the voluntary support of a free market, but the coercive power of government in a non-free market. The USPS is not a business which is subject to natural (voluntary) market forces -- political power grants them immunity from market forces. They simply don't have to compete as a real business does. When they fail, they are rewarded with more revenue, same as any other government program. Quite the opposite of what happens in a voluntary market.

      This is like claiming good times because highway traffic is up on toll roads. We were forced to fund the construction of those roads in the first place! Furthermore, there is only one choice!

      If you were forced to fund a startup retail store called Wal-Mart, would you find reason to celebrate when they open their 100th store?

      Revenue for the USPS is up? I don't see why anyone but the power elite would give a damn.

    6. Re:Who cares? by andrewman327 · · Score: 1
      The Postal Service only gets 20-30 cents on each piece of junk mail going into your inbox. Compare that to the $8.10 they get for every flat rate Priority Mail box a shipper sends. Without packages the Postal Service would have a really hard time


      I live in Bucks County and I have learned that most services in downtown Philly are bad (cheesesteaks excepted). I don't blame the USPS for that.


      Am I the only person who still writes real letters? I am only 20 years old but I think it makes things more personal. I e-mail an incredible amount but I still write my friends the old fashioned way.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
    7. Re:Who cares? by raehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As far as I can tell, with all of the junk mail that comes piling into my mailbox, the USPS ain't going anywhere anytime soon.

      That junk mail is what allows the post office to offer first class mail for $0.37 when UPS ground and FedEx ground are often $8 and up.

      Besides, they more powers and subsidies than any other delivery corporation out there.

      Powers maybe, subsidies no, USPS has it's own separate budget.

      I highly doubt they were scared - considering the quality of service I receive in downtown Philly - job security is not an issue.

      I have never received a more consistent level of excellent customer service than I have with USPS. But if everyone else in dontown philly has your attitude, there may just not be any employees with suitable customer service skills available to hire.

    8. Re:Who cares? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      Content (books, movies, etc) shipments through snail mail will decrease.

      Most likely.. but it won't be anytime soon if it is upto content producers it seems.

      Hardware will stabilize after the major Vista upgrade.

      Don't worry, there will be a new reason for hardware upgrades once most people can run Vista.

    9. Re:Who cares? by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      I write my friends the old-fashioned way, too. I use pine.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    10. Re:Who cares? by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      When they fail, they are rewarded with more revenue, same as any other government program.

      The USPS gets no funds from Congress and is on its own. It has even managed to turn a profit for most of the last decade. Please stop spreading nonsense.

    11. Re:Who cares? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Pine? Hmph! It's still the ol' chisel and granite for me! Kids these days-- driving their shiny cars without a callous on their feet!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:Who cares? by natedubbya · · Score: 1

      Besides, they more powers and subsidies than any other delivery corporation out there.

      Actually, that's a common misconception. The Postal Service is not subsidized in any way, shape or form. They are fully independent (in financial terms) and operational solely from stamps and postage rates. They do have given monopoly powers of first and third class mail, mainly what everyone considers your standard letters. But as far as your tax money and government spending goes, no money is given to the USPS to help them operate.

      The 39 cent stamp is also quite similar and even better than most other country's rates.

      I think people just like to "hate" the USPS because they think it's a governmental agency run by our tax money, and stamps are just another way to stick it to us. The reality is just the opposite.


    13. Re:Who cares? by friedo · · Score: 1

      A government enforced monopoly and exemption from all taxes is a form of subsidy. UPS and Fedex don't get to deliver first class mail, and they have to pay income taxes.

    14. Re:Who cares? by Chaset · · Score: 1

      Profit? I thought they were legally required to break even. Not less, not more. I suppose any excess can just be turned over to the next year's budget to reduce the need to increase postage.

      As for the "legal monopoly" comments, the post office was established in the Constitution, right? It was back when mailing letters was vital (and only) way to communicate across the nation. The founders thought it important enough to make sure such a vital service is not subject to the whims of private institutions. Yeah, things have changed, but at the time, they had a good reason.

      --
      -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
    15. Re:Who cares? by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      Q: Who cares?

      A: Anyone who wants to see more of the positive effects of the internet brought under a media spotlight instead of just hearing about online predators on myspace.
      A: Anyone who gets into arguments (discussions) with people who think the only thing the internet is good for is pirating music.
      A: Anyone who wants some extra evidence when trying to explain to some ignorant individual that the internet is not just an evil system of tubes.
      ...to name a few

    16. Re:Who cares? by natedubbya · · Score: 1

      I'd complain about this tax-free subsidy you mention, but 39 cents a stamp is lower than most other countries. Are you sure you're not just complaining for the sake of complaining?

      The 39 cents (USD) required by the USPS to deliver a letter in the U.S. compares favorably with other industrialized countries, such as those of the European Union, where the postage for an ordinary domestic first-class letter is nearly twice that much. from wikipedia

      Congress must aprove stamp increases, controlling any obscene profit taking that a private company would normally try.


    17. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only subsidies the Post Office receives is for the mail that is for the Blind and/or Handicapped. Everything else is paid for by postage.

  2. Bugmenot by 9x320 · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Bugmenot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. usps by xdxfp · · Score: 1, Funny

    not to mention all the anthrax...

    --
    HRESULT WinAPIGetSystemProcessThreadMetricsMenu...
    LibraryVolumeModuleHandlePtrEx(PHSPTMMLVM PHndl);
  4. So?.. by Klaidas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is obvious without any researches - if we buy stuff on the internet, they ship that stuff.
    What would be interesting is how much less *letters* are now being sent via snail mail

    1. Re:So?.. by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think this is obvious at all. In the last 5 years, I believe I have shipped maybe 2 things from online retailers to myself with USPS. Everything else (and I'm talking dozens of packages) went Fedex or UPS. How many sites even -offer- USPS as a shipping option?

      The only 'obvious' thing that would show an increase would be Netflix/Gamefly/etc. There's a LOT of shipping going on there.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:So?.. by sangreal66 · · Score: 4, Informative

      USPS Priority Mail is pretty common on eBay and smaller retailers

    3. Re:So?.. by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      If my memory serves me right, amazon.com "free" shipping is by USPS.
      With Prime (like 80 bucks a year) it's shipped ups 2nd day (or ground if you're close enough to the warehouse it came from). but seriously, how many people fork up 80 bucks a year for prime?

      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:So?.. by TRS80NT · · Score: 1

      I always choose USPS if it's an option. FedEx and UPS don't have access to my building's mailbox lobby and USPS does. So for anything smaller than a breadbox (whatever that is) it's more convenient to have the PO deliver it, rather than running around, coordinating delivery by the other guys.


      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
    5. Re:So?.. by rfunches · · Score: 1

      How many sites even -offer- USPS as a shipping option?


      The largest online retailer uses them for Super Saver and standard shipping. I also see a lot of QVC returns by USPS, and they ship to customers via UPS or USPS.

    6. Re:So?.. by weave · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, my wife is an ebay addict and she has stuff going out and coming in via Priority mail all the time.

    7. Re:So?.. by goodcow · · Score: 1

      Um... I do. Amazon's free shipping is slow. First of all, they hold the package for a few days rather than shipping it right away, and then it goes ground, either by USPS or UPS. For only $80 a year, I can place an order and it'll have entered the "shipping soon" phase within hours, and I'll have it in two days. Or overnight, for $4 per item. You really have no idea how this changes online shopping habits, especially coupled with not having a minimum order to seek now. (i.e. $25) I've always been a huge Amazon fan, and I've had Prime since the day it debuted, and I now buy practically everything from Amazon. Yesterday I ordered a pair of gloves for $4.49 with free shipping and no tax. It'll be here tomorrow. That's a very enjoyable thing to have.

    8. Re:So?.. by ThadMan · · Score: 1

      There is a ton of people that ship USPS. Priority mail in particular. Priority mail is usually cheaper than others for packages that are three pounds or less (plus they provide free boxes). Also, they are the only cost effective means for shipping internationally; and a very popular method to ship to the military abroad (No one else can ship to APO/FPOs). My business ships 90% of our orders through the postal service.

    9. Re:So?.. by Gospodin · · Score: 2, Informative

      My personal experience is just the opposite. I ship almost everything from Amazon using the free "slow boat to China" method, and I've gotten orders delivered the next day or the day after quite often. If it takes 4-5 days I'm surprised. It really helps that they have warehouses around the country.

      That said, it's interesting to hear your thumbs-up appraisal of Amazon Prime. I've considered the free trial just to see what it's like. So far I'm resisting it - I'm afraid it would lead to a lot of impulse buys.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    10. Re:So?.. by brian23 · · Score: 1

      FedEx uses USPS trucks and planes to ship items so you are still using USPS indirectly, whether you realize it or not. Notice that the Post Office doesn't have UPS boxes in front of them, it's because FedEx has a contract with USPS. UPS has sued to allow them to put boxes there, but so far the Post Office hasn't allowed them. I think there was an agreement recently, however, that will allow UPS to place boxes there. Also, I actually find it cheaper to ship USPS in most cases. Just as the article said, a lot of people don't ship large or heavy objects through USPS because of the restrictions, but all in all most packages are going through the USPS whether you realize it or not.

    11. Re:So?.. by pkulak · · Score: 1

      Amazon ships all their free shipping that way. And I have about 5 CDs a week shipped to me courtesy of Half.com on USPS.

    12. Re:So?.. by winnabago · · Score: 1
      UPS has sued to allow them to put boxes there, but so far the Post Office hasn't allowed them.
      I have seen many cases where UPS, FEDEX, DHL, etc. have drop boxes immediately adjacent to a post office on the easement or right of way (ex: sidewalk). If you obtain town/city approval, there isn't a thing that can be done.
      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    13. Re:So?.. by knarf · · Score: 1

      Almost every time I order something from the US to be delivered to Sweden or the Netherlands I have to battle the seller to send the goods through USPS instead of UPS. Given my experience with UPS - they managed to damage an oscilloscope beyond repair, the shipping box was almost round when it arrived - and their exorbitant prices I will not do any business with them anymore. USPS on the other hand has always worked flawlessly and the packages can get delivered to my doorstep here in rural Sweden (UPS makes me go and get them at their depot). So, no USPS automatically means no deal as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    14. Re:So?.. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is obvious at all. In the last 5 years, I believe I have shipped maybe 2 things from online retailers to myself with USPS. Everything else (and I'm talking dozens of packages) went Fedex or UPS. How many sites even -offer- USPS as a shipping option?


      It is if you want to be successful at shipping products internationally (either by eBay or as a store). UPS *SUCKS* for international shipping - sure it only costs the sender $10 or $20, but the buyer is then stiffed with a fee to cross the border (broker fees). And in practically all my experience, the broker fees have come out *MORE* than the taxes I would've paid. (Case in point, a seller only shipped UPS, and they stopped shipping to Canada after learning that buyers were being forced to pay $70 (off a $200 item) in fees. My experience was a $10 declared item (taxes owing: $1.40) wanting another $20 in fees. The best rates I had was paying $110 on a $300 item (including taxes, which were around $42)) This gets bad quickly for the seller as I can refuse the shipment, and chargeback the cost. Now the seller has to pay shipping *BOTH* ways (or shipping one way, plus the cost of the item as "abandoned"), plus chargeback costs. Though, most sellers will just simply refund the money. Technically, the item wasn't "delivered" so you can't force RMA or restock fees, or deduct shipping from the refund.

      FedEx is a bit better - fixed rate $25 plus taxes. But the post office has the best rates yet - $5 plus taxes, or $8 express shipping plus taxes. And that's if they even bother applying the tax - sometimes they wont just to save the paperwork, especially on items that may or may not be taxable in the first place (used goods, for example, may have some exemptions). So rather than bother with the paperwork and possible contesting of the fees (MORE paperwork), they let it go.

      Plus someone has to explain to me how sites that have UPS/FedEx shipping can often cost way more than USPS. Especially on small items where the shipping can easily be $30 (plus whatever they charge when they deliver), while USPS can be under $10. And this is using bog-standard ground shipping (UPS/FedEx) or airmail (USPS - airmail is often cheaper and is much faster than economy ground). Overnight, and UPS/FedEx have no competition (but the prices are equally high).
    15. Re:So?.. by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      For books and CDs, USPS Media Mail rate (formerly known as book rate) is the cheapest way to go. I buy almost all of my books and music online, and I'm never in a big enough hurry to pay five or ten bucks extra just to get it a little faster. I also sell books wholesale from my web site, and media mail is by far the best deal.

    16. Re:So?.. by ThisOrThat · · Score: 1

      I've had a mix of both experiences with using the free shipping. Lately it seems items I have had shipped this way did take longer then I had been used to. I don't know if it was the items I ordered or the fact I was using the free shipping. Either way it's a pretty good value as most of the time I do order more then $25 or I find some odd or end to order to make it $25.

      The one thing don't like sometimes is items not be sold directly by Amazon.com and thus not eligible for free shipping! Oh well.

      - Justin

    17. Re:So?.. by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the type of site. I ship a lot of fairly low-value, small items. Probably 80% of my shipments are by first class mail, or airmail letter post for international shipments. A typical package with an electronic kit and a connector or two might cost $1.10 within the US, and maybe $2.80 to just about anywhere in the world.

      Not only is it vastly cheaper than UPS, FedEx, or DHL, but it's quite a bit faster compared to ground service. Three days is typical for coast-to-coast shipment. I can get a package to Australia in less time, and for less money, than I could get the same package to the east coast by UPS.

      Also, it goes almost anywhere. Ok, so the one package I sent to Antarctica went through some sort of forwarder, but I've shipped to about 40 countries so far, with a loss rate of well under 1%. I don't think I've ever had a domestic package permanently lost.

      As for shipping to myself, I use priority mail whenever it's an option, unless it's something heavy. Assuming the vendor charges honest shipping rates, of course.

    18. Re:So?.. by Dave114 · · Score: 1

      Brokerage fees are indeed a great nuisance. I've adopted a policy over the past few years of refusing to buy from any US-based merchants unless they'll ship via USPS. This applies even if their product is a little more expensive.

    19. Re:So?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not enough sights offer USPS shipping, if you'e Canadian. I regularly import from the U.S., and with USPS the shipment:
      a) arrives,
      b) doesn't have an arse-load of bogus custom broker fees attached, and
      c) has reasonable shipping fees.

      I wish I could say the same about the company that's suing under NAFTA because Canada Post's infrastructure gives it an unfair advantage in the courier business. If the lost packages and high fees aren't doing it for you, I guess the only answer is to sue.

    20. Re:So?.. by ottffssent · · Score: 1

      The USPS has, by far, the best package delivery service, in my opinion, for the small business or ebayer.

      Parcel Post is cheap; Priority Mail only slightly less so. Carrier pick-up is the best thing ever. Send at least one priority or express mail package, and your mail carrier will pick up whatever else you happen to have that needs shipping at the same time, for free. I live fairly close to the nearest post office, about 5 miles round trip, yet even with that proximity it's nearly always cheaper to upgrade to priority mail so they'll pickup for free than it is to drive to the post office. Add in the value of my time and it's a no-brainer.

      And when I do go to the post office, the people there are invariably (at least at the 3 post offices I frequent) well-informed. I have asked some rather difficult questions and the employees there know the answers to most of them off the top of their heads; the rest require some brief looking-up or asking a colleague. I have yet to stump them.

      Contrast this with UPS, which told me with a straight face that although they would cheerfully take my money for insurance, they would deny any claim for damage to a $200 computer packed in the manufacturer's original box and styrofoam. But for an extra $70, they'd do a worse job packing it for me but might not blame me for dropping it off a shelf.

      I don't have much experience with FedEx, but my impression is that they fall somewhere in the middle. The actual package delivery seems to be fairly competent (less damage than UPS, though to be fair I've only shipped lighter and therefore harder-to-damage packages with FedEx). Their service personnel can't hold a candle to the USPS though.

      I don't know what the relative volumes for ebay versus Amazon and the like are, but ebay's certainly no slouch in terms of package volume, and parcel post and priority mail are quite popular because they're so easy to use. Even first class mail is useful because so many small technology items come in under the weight limits, and it's even cheaper than the package services.

    21. Re:So?.. by gnuman99 · · Score: 1

      Same thing in Canada. You want stuff from US, it is "cheaper" shipping to get it UPS than USPS. But then they tack on their stupid "brockage free" and your costs are much, much bigger than USPS. So now I also never accept UPS (ie. OOPS). Regular mail service is 100 times better.

    22. Re:So?.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      If Prime applied to their used sales (amazon marketplace) and sales through their associates (i.e. "buy this piece electronics through J&R Music World") I would use it. The problem is that it basically is only good for stuff they actually stock themselves, which basically means books and movies (all their other "stores" have just token stocks). That might be useful if you buy an ASSLOAD of books and movies and shop for them exclusively on Amazon.

      IMHO, the real savings come from using half.com and amazon marketplace anyway. I've bought DVD's on those for $5 that retail new for $20.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    23. Re:So?.. by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Eric,
      Even if you bought an assload of books/movies, it's only worth 80 bucks/yr if each one is shipped independently. Otherwise, just have them box it into one box and you get free shipping and save 80 bucks/year (unless you are on the trial period for prime).

      I had a prime trail for 3 months. In the end, I decided it wasn't worth 80/year. Most of my orders from amazon are for stuff I don't need immedietly. And if I need something bad enough, I'd get it from the local store. Same day, not 2 days later (or next day for 5 extra dollars).

      I view prime as a gimmack to make you think "I must shop exclusively at amazon else I 'waste' my prime membership. Most of the time I get stuff from amazon within 2-3 days anyway. I'm sure the bean counters figured it doesn't cost them much more to ship things 2nd day, and it's all about perception to the customer.

      As for 3rd party merchants, one reason I don't shop with them/ebay is the high s/h charges. I'm sorry, but if I'm going to pay 5 bucks for shipping a 10 dollar (used) item, I'd rather get a new one from a real store today.

      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    24. Re:So?.. by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Too many.

      USPS sucks. So does UPS.

    25. Re:So?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the free trial of Prime a few months ago and wasn't too impressed. It was maybe a day faster than the free "slow" shipping, definitely not worth the $80/year for me.

      I'm with you on the regular free shpiping, though. Even though it says something ridiculous like up to 9-14 business days, my order almost always ships within 24 hours and arrives quickly. I don't use it for really time-critical stuff (last minute gifts) just in case it actually gets pushed out that one time, but otherwise it's awesome. Really, it's too good because they're undercutting their own business on Prime!

  5. Phishing will push it even further by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an extremely entertaining conversation with one UK bank at the moment.

    The clowns insist on using snail mail to reply to mails sent using their "secure" webmail. They have stated that they do not send emails to customers as a matter of policy and they are forced to stick to it even if this means filling Royal Mail coffers.

    As e-commerce grows there will be more and more cases like this until the end-users start to actively use encrypted/signed email and banks start to require this for communicating with them.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    1. Re:Phishing will push it even further by silvwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The company I have my 401k (retirement plan) with lets me send them "email" through a web form, then sends me a confirmation that my message went through via email. When they reply, I get an informational message via email telling me to login to the website to read the message.

    2. Re:Phishing will push it even further by AceJohnny · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could you elaborate a little further? Because with your short description, I can see the sense of the bank's position of preferring snail-mail to encrypted/signed email. Technically, encrypted/signed e-mail is a valid system, but so is snail-mail. Snail-mail has the advantage that it requires nothing extra to be installed from the consumer, who is already used to receiving smail from the bank. Furthermore, it'll cost more for a phisher (why do you think spam and phishing are so prevalent in e-mail and not in snail-mail? Because the costs to the sender are negligeable in e-mail)
      Sure, encryption (by which I mean encryption or signing, mostly through the OpenPGP standard) is accepted and common in techy and specialized circles. But then, I work in a large technology corporation, surrounded by engineers and where industrial secrets are important, and even here encyption use is marginal (maybe slowed by the administrative hassle of declaring your key, granted).
      I've long since dropped the idea of getting my parents or siblings to use encryption for sensitive communication. Sure, I've spooked them enough with the horror stories, but they just haven't caught on, despite me leveling the terrain.
      What's worse, if they *had* caught on to using the tools, I'm 100% certain that they won't pay attention to the signature of a forged e-mail from the bank. "Oh, the signature changed. Meh, they must've updated".
      Remember, don't mistake your values with those of the General Populace.

      Y'know, those who prefer security to liberty...

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    3. Re:Phishing will push it even further by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Banking is important. Imagine they're trying to send you an important message but your computer is broken or you've reached your ISP's monthly quota. This is why snail mail is important.

    4. Re:Phishing will push it even further by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Maybe your ISP cut you off because there were insufficent funds to pay last months bill... The bank sent you an email to notifiy you of the problem but...

  6. duh! by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Informative

    First class mail isn't where the money is, especially home delivery.

    If they could they would not even deliver on weekends. Hell they could save money by delivering fewer days. My Aunt and cousin are Postmasters. Home delivery is the big expense.

    If it wasn't for filler (all that junk mail) first class postage would be even higher. Its still the best deal for getting something to someone.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:duh! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      First class mail isn't where the money is, especially home delivery.

      Huh. I guess unfortunately for the USPS, I send a lot of small items by first class, in a DVD-sized box. I know people whine about the cost of mail whenever prices go up, but frankly, USPS is a bargain. As you say, the cost of getting to the home is a lot. Not only is UPS and FedEx more expensive, you have to pay them a certain fee if you want them to stop every day, whether or not packages change hands on any given day.

  7. Lots by lastberserker · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    What would be interesting is how much less *letters* are now being sent via snail mail

    I send my bills in letters, you insensitive clod!

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  8. Profit... by PinkyDead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..is about minimising your fixed costs while maximising your variable returns.

    Ok - IANAE (economist) and IANAPM (postman) - but this is probably a reasonable simplification.

    With the postal service, fixed costs are about delivering a single item, where as high variable returns come from large packages. With the decline of letters and such (due to e-mail etc), and the concurrent increase in parcels (due to online shopping) - how could they not make better returns.

    If a postal service is making losses and is in decline (as a number are in Europe), I would suggest that they should stop looking at environmental factors, start modernising their organizations and provide a service that complements the needs of their 21st century customer.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
    1. Re:Profit... by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      Err... fixed costs are, well, fixed. That means you owe them regardless of how much business you do. Or even if you open for business in a time period or not.

      Being able to turn more profits on packages doesn't terribly surprise me, though. When I have a game shipped from FacelessCorporateVGRetailer.com, they pack it in a box. I'm sure the box with the game generates less revenue than an equivilent volume of letters. But the box is also less dense. It also only has to be sorted once (per facility?), whereas the volume of letters would have dozens or hundreds of sort operations.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    2. Re:Profit... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      ..is about minimising your fixed costs while maximising your variable returns.

      Ok - IANAE (economist) and IANAPM (postman) - but this is probably a reasonable simplification.

      With the postal service, fixed costs are about delivering a single item, where as high variable returns come from large packages. With the decline of letters and such (due to e-mail etc), and the concurrent increase in parcels (due to online shopping) - how could they not make better returns.

      If a postal service is making losses and is in decline (as a number are in Europe), I would suggest that they should stop looking at environmental factors, start modernising their organizations and provide a service that complements the needs of their 21st century customer.


      Well, a bit too much simplification. Profit is about minimizing total costs while maximizing revenue.

      Fixed vs variable comes in when you decide wether to continue an operatoin or shut it down - i.e if continuing to operate loses less money than shuting down (i.e. my revenue covers my variable costs and some of my fixed) it makes more snese operate assuming you see profits at some point in the future. This is why airlines keep operating even when they are losing money - they lose less than if they stopped flying do to the high fixed costs of the airplanes. OTOH, if your variable costs are high and fixed are low, you cease operating when business is bad and start back when it is good - such as seasonal service operations like say an ice cream stand.

      The marginal cost of delivering one more letter from the post office to the house is small - so any increase in volume is generally good. The advantage the post office has is they run a fixed, predictable route - so they can deliver the odd package to your house for less than other services who need to make a special trip that they can't reliably plan for in advance (which is why home dleivery is more expensive); the USPS is driving by your door already whether or not they stop. If you aren't home and teh package requires a second delivery to get a signature they are going to be back tomorrow anywhy so the marginal cost of taht second stop is small. They can still reduce costs by cutting Saturday delivery since they have no real servcie guarantee so stopping a run saves gas / vehicle wear and tear and payroll (assuming they don't have to pay the carrier the same salary) while not reducing revenue (they still get the letter to deliver two days later) raising their profitability.

      While improving servcie would be nice, they really don't have to since no one can compete with them for the day to day delivery of non-speed sensitive materials.

      Of course, now I have over simplified...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    3. Re:Profit... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I don't think your correct about the margin being that much higher on packages. Where the money really is, is with pre-sorted, barcoded, mass mailings.

      The discount that's given on presorted mail is substantial, but the cost savings to the USPS of all that presorting is even more than the discount; thus they make more money on it. When you do a mass mailing, in order to get the best rate you basically have to presort the mail all the way down (in some cases) to the ZIP+4 or even down below that to the carrier/route level. All the postal service has to do at that point is take the whole sack or bundle and transport it to the end post office, and actually deliver it (which they're doing anyway). All the time-consuming sorting is done. That's their milk and honey.

      Packages are a pain because they're tough to automate, particularly when you let people just hand-write the address on. (And don't do what UPS does, which is require a machine-printed, barcoded address label, or charge $5 for reading a hand-written one.) With envelopes at least you can run them through mechanical systems to read the front of the mailpiece and try to determine the address (and failing that, send the image to a human being for interpretation), large packages and irregularly sized mailpieces take a lot of manual labor to get through the system, and require much more expensive sorting equipment (meaning that you have to have more centralized "hubs" for sorting). Not to mention that heavy packages are much more sensitive to variable costs (particularly fuel) while you can pack enough letters onto a truck to make them more dependent on fixed costs. When you have a rate structure that's difficult to change (i.e. you can't just tack on a "Fuel Surcharge" like UPS does), package delivery gets even riskier as a major line of business.

      I think you're correct in that the USPS needs to look hard at what's being delivered today, and what's going to move to electronic "delivery" in the future and what's going to remain physical. But right now, they're basically in the letter-delivery business, with a sideline into packages that's probably a lot less profitable. (Or only made profitable because they're already moving large volumes of stuff around, so they can afford to take the packages along for the ride.) The USPS would have to fundamentally alter a lot of its operations if it was to become a package carrier similar to UPS or DHL.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  9. The Royal Mail knows this by Don_dumb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That is why they are just about to change the postal charges for packages to include the size of the object as well as the weight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5231576.stm Previously they only charged based on weight.

    --
    If this were really happening, what would you think?
  10. i can see it now by polar+red · · Score: 0

    Postal services around the world buying loads and loads of mailservers just for driving internet usage ... I'll go check my spam-filter now.

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  11. How many are A-O-Hell CD shipments? by jkrise · · Score: 0

    That's the big question... I guess Viagra and Service Packs would be fairly equal in terms of shipments, and together, they should account for 90% of the non-AOL-CD shipments.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  12. Sounds like a similar story to the UK... by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The story on the old rumour mill over here was that Amazon was almost single handedly responsible for saving the royal mail in the UK due to the massive increase in revenue it brought with postage of larger packages.

    Personally, I don't beleive Amazon would've single handedly saved it, but no doubt it contributed alongside all the other online retailers. I think it'll only get better for postal services and couriers too, it's the high street that should be (Well, "is" rather than "should be" in most cases) worrying as people shift from a culture of high street shopping to having everything delivered by mail.

  13. eBay saved USPS! by thealsir · · Score: 0

    thank eBay :P

    and I always love how people thought that email would mean the demise of the post office; you can't attach furniture to an email message.

    --
    Do not downmod posts "overrated" simply because you disagree with them.
  14. Gee... duh! by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, even before the advent of emails, who wrote a letter unless he ABSOLUTELY had to? Instead, people called or, if it had to be written, they faxed it. Simply because of the speed difference.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Gee... duh! by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      I mean, even before the advent of emails, who wrote a letter unless he ABSOLUTELY had to? Instead, people called or, if it had to be written, they faxed it. Simply because of the speed difference.


      Heh, I wonder if people thought about the telephone system making the postal service obsolete when they first started coming into use a hundred years ago. But I suppose the world was too large for technology to have an immediate impact then. :-P

  15. Re:Or Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many people on eBay use UPS. Netflix has 5 million subscribers and only uses USPS.

  16. To quote a famous man... by MWelchUK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "When one door closes another door opens; but we so often look so long and so regretfully upon the closed door, that we do not see the ones which open for us."
    - Alexander Graham Bell

    It seems the post office are one of the few places that have found another open door rather than litigating to have the closed door forced open.

    1. Re:To quote a famous man... by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      They didn't really find another open door. They're still moving stuff from point A to point B by way of points C-F.

      The door didn't really close. Just the crap they drag through is different. Or rather, the distribution of small, flat crap is down and bulky crap with pesky, ignored instructions* is up.

      * (This end up, Fragile)

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
    2. Re:To quote a famous man... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It's the same door, it's just different people walking through it.

      Your analogy would be closer if the music industry had litigated to keep people using cassettes, rather than moving to CDs.

    3. Re:To quote a famous man... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 0
      It seems the post office are one of the few places that have found another open door rather than litigating to have the closed door forced open.

      Or, litigating to have another door closed, forcing the public to open the first door.
      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    4. Re:To quote a famous man... by sanyasi · · Score: 1

      The RIAA isnt legislating to force open the original door, but rather, litigate the other door shut.

  17. Postcrossing by avij · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is probably rather insignificant in the grand scheme of things, but projects like Postcrossing wouldn't exist if people weren't able to send post cards via snail mail, so at least in this case Internet has increased snailmail usage. Check out that site if you're interested in sending postcards to random people all over the world. It's rather weird, but I'm told it's an interesting hobby.

    --

    Follow your Euro bills at EBT
  18. So postage stamp prices will be coming back down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right?

  19. USPS Ranked Most Trusted by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting to note that a survey was done recently of the most trusted Government branches/offices/operations and the USPS was ranked #1. This is in direct contrast to the Executive Branch of government.

    http://www.directmag.com/news/usps-022306/index.ht ml

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:USPS Ranked Most Trusted by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 1

      Here in the US there are only three branches of governmetn the Post Office fals into the Executive Branch.

    2. Re:USPS Ranked Most Trusted by ottffssent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People trust people (groups, companies, whatever) that they like. It's hard not to like the USPS. The post office is fast, cheap, courteous, and otherwise well run. Its website is well managed and contains more than enough information to efficiently use their services. The biggest downside I can find is that it's so popular that the lines are frequently long at the branch offices. This is what carrier pickup is for.

    3. Re:USPS Ranked Most Trusted by blank+axolotl · · Score: 1

      John Potter for President!

      (US Postmaster General)

  20. Sig Reply by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
    * Winners compare their achievments to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others. * ARMONK, NY - Aug. 8,

    So if you set unambitious goals and meet them, you're a winner. If you are the best ___________ shop on the planet and fail to meet really ambitious goals, then you're a loser. This sounds like especially unenlightened management-speak.

    By this metric, GW Bush is a winner and may be our best President ever. He has accomplished a great many of his goals. And those historians who compare him to the other Presidents and say that he may be our worst President ever...losers. Sorry, no sale.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    1. Re:Sig Reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      History doesn't know yet, and your opinion is far too insignificant at this stage to have any impact.

    2. Re:Sig Reply by servognome · · Score: 1
      By this metric, GW Bush is a winner and may be our best President ever. He has accomplished a great many of his goals. And those historians who compare him to the other Presidents and say that he may be our worst President ever...losers. Sorry, no sale.

      Let's compare what he has done to some of the great presidents:
      1. Gotten us into an unpopular war - Lincoln
      2. Violated the rights of American citizens - Lincoln, FDR
      3. Racked up a huge national debt - FDR
      4. Pursued an expansionist policy - Jefferson

      I'm not saying Bush is a great president (personally I strongly disagree with his policies), but you can't judge the historical significance of people and events during their time.
      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  21. UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm convinced the only thing keeping the British Post Office running is eBay.

  22. Not only packages... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1, Funny

    don't forget invoices, letters from lawyers etc.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    1. Re:Not only packages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this... funny? He made a good point. It should be insightful, if anything. Funny?

  23. Of course... by E++99 · · Score: 1

    Of course if the USPS didn't have a government-sponsered letter monopoly to use to gouge the letter-sending public, they couldn't ship packages below cost to undercut UPS and FedEx, and then no one would use those bums for anything.

    1. Re:Of course... by idobi · · Score: 1

      The USPS is a self-sustaining company, which in 2005 recieved $37 million from the federal government - which paid for sending congressional mail.

    2. Re:Of course... by necro81 · · Score: 1

      Part of that exclusivity is that the postal service, by congressional mandate, must break even year to yaer. It is not allowed to accumulate profit, or run a deficit. Naturally, they can't do this precisely, but they come pretty close.

    3. Re:Of course... by wv5k · · Score: 1

      And ALL of you miss the main point for that congressionally-mandated monopoly. It's NOT to protect the USPS, and discourage competition. It's only purpose is to protect the postage rates, and reliability of delivery of Joe-The-Goat-Farmer that lives out 42 miles from the nearest Post Office, which might be one of THREE buildings in the nearest town. Don't laugh, there's multiple places like this in Texas, Idaho, Wyoming, etc. And you can bet-your-ass they vote in EVERY election. If there wasn't a government monoply in place, you think you could get a a one ounce letter delivered to Auntie Jo by UPS or FedEx in a location like this for less than $20? Or do you think Uncle Mike could pay his bills via outgoing mail for a couple of dollars a month? Nooo, it'd probably be cheaper to spend $40 in gas to drive round-trip and hand deliver them...

    4. Re:Of course... by E++99 · · Score: 1
      It's only purpose is to protect the postage rates, and reliability of delivery of Joe-The-Goat-Farmer that lives out 42 miles from the nearest Post Office... If there wasn't a government monoply in place, you think you could get a a one ounce letter delivered to Auntie Jo by UPS or FedEx in a location like this for less than $20? Or do you think Uncle Mike could pay his bills via outgoing mail for a couple of dollars a month?
      I seriously doubt that even the USPS is obscene enough to drive 84 miles round trip to see of Joe-The-Goat-Farmer has a letter in his mailbox today. If they are, so much the worse. In point of fact, the previous zip code I lived in had no mail delivery service at all! Everyone had to pick up and drop off their mail at the post office. Beyond that, the woman who's house we rented an apartment in was confined to a wheelchair, and could never leave the house. If she didn't have family and friends in the area to take care of her, the only LEGAL way she would have to pay her bills would be to pack them in freakin BOXES and call UPS for a home pick-up! If competition were allowed, then companies would find creative ways to provide economical services to people like that, and to Joe-The-Goat-Farmer, so he DOESN'T have to make a monthly trip in to town to pay his bills -- like a fixed-fee monthly mail pickup, or whatnot.
    5. Re:Of course... by E++99 · · Score: 1
      The USPS is a self-sustaining company, which in 2005 recieved $37 million from the federal government - which paid for sending congressional mail.
      No, sorry, regardless of what your balance sheet says, you don't get to call yourself a self-sustaining company when you have a government-mandated monopoly. That's the force of law that is sustaining you, not your business practices.
    6. Re:Of course... by wv5k · · Score: 1

      Ummm, well, speaking from 30 years of experience in delivering the mail, I've never heard of an address that had NO delivery service. I live (and deliver mail) in a small town here in Texas. The station here has 13 city routes, and 27 rural routes. At least four of the rural routes here drive in excess of 170 miles a day. Admittedly, many of these deliveries are to boxes ganged up on a paved Farm Road (FM), and the people have to walk or drive down to the boxes. So it's not perfect, but I absolutely assure you we lose money servicing these folks. Private industry will NOT lose money, they will simply raise the rates enough to cover their costs, or not deliver there at all. This type of situation is the main reason for the postal monopoly......

  24. Email Tax? by TheRhino · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean they'll be repealing the email tax I've been hearing about?

  25. The figures can lie. by Drewsonian · · Score: 1

    They make more revenue, but they've also raised the price of postage several times in the past 5 years.

    Maybe this is the real story:
    Less mail, higher charges = more money for USPS

    1. Re:The figures can lie. by raehl · · Score: 1

      They make more revenue, but they've also raised the price of postage several times in the past 5 years.

      1) But not much out of line with inflation.
      2) If you don't like it, use their competitors.
      3) Apply some common sense. 1st class mail delivery is really not profitable. It's more of a government mandated service USPS is required to provide that they really don't make money on. Delivering packages using an existing shipping network, however, is very profitable - the USPS makes a much, much higher margin on priority mail and express mail deliveries than it does first class mail.

      Losing volume on items that wern't profitable for you in the first place in exchange for increased volume in items that are profitable for you will obviously lead to more profit.

    2. Re:The figures can lie. by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Of course, you should also take in account the price hike of fuel in the last five years...

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    3. Re:The figures can lie. by Drewsonian · · Score: 1

      Both true. Didn't think of those angles.

  26. EBay by jackbird · · Score: 1

    Yesterday I got a postcard from the US Postal Service advertising free "how to sell stuff on EBay" seminars to be held at the local post office.

  27. Silly by Primis · · Score: 1

    If this were the case, why has postage gone up so much in just the past 10 years?

    Oh they're hurting all right. Maybe if they developed betetr QoS themselves, they wouldn't be in this bind.

    1. Re:Silly by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Inflation + fuel prices + Congress telling them they must put billions into escrow...

  28. And, yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the government wants to tax the hell out of e-Commerce. Way to cut off your nose to spite you face, assholes.

  29. the Post Office is profitable in every category by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last 2 cent raise from 37 to 39 was not for USPS revenue, it was a general tax that went into the general fund for Congress to spend. There's another raise to 43 cents scheduled June 2007, again as a general tax increase.

    This is the first time this has been done, ever. It was fiscal conservative (!) George Shrub who did this. He's spending money like a drunken social worker, and it's OK with his war-monger worshippers.

    Junk, that is Standard, Mail is immensely profitable. With processing by Mailers+4 (hint:money making opportunity for a sharp programmer), it goes on a pallet, is machine sorted, and isn't touched again by a human until it's popped into your box. That's about 15 cents gross profit per piece.

    USPS delivers more in one day than FedEx and UPS and all others do in a whole year. By rights, First Class should be about 30 cents.

  30. Spam/junkmail by bano · · Score: 1

    I think with the advent of spam, The junk mailers realize they have to send out more of their filth to keep their market share of ripping off old people, and annoying the rest of the general population. This probably makes up and more for the loss of general letters and bills comming thru the mail system. I wish unsolicited mail(both regular and electronic) was illegal much like faxspam.
    While I'm ranting on junk mail, I would also like to bitch about the douche that throws the free papers in my yard twice a week, and the people that send me phonebooks every 3 months. Phonebooks should be strictly opt-in, I think a majority of people have found better ways to find the information that is normally gotten from the 10lbs of advertising ladend crap they so graciously dump on my doorstep every 90ish days.

  31. Re:So postage stamp prices will be coming back dow by Zippy_wonderslug · · Score: 1

    Sure, postage will come back down right after oil drops to about $30/barrel, healthcare costs follow suit, everyone decides that we want to live on a commune and share wages.

    Problem is, everyone wants to make more money, have health insurance, and all the other ammenities of modern life. So in order to keep those postal employees, the USPS, BPO, Australian Post, and all the others have to raise their rates to offset the costs.

    At least with this latest rate increase that the USPS is announcing, they are offering ways to reduce the postage. If you are a mailer that routinely sends flat mail (not folded in any way) you will pay a higher rate per ounce than if you send a half fold or a tri fold. This is because of the sorting equipment that is used, flats have a number of different sizes that they can be so the sorting equipment has to operate much more slowly than a 6x9 envelope that will only be a certain thickness and a general area where the addresses will be.

  32. Revenue has Increased by lys1123 · · Score: 1

    *Slaps Forehead*

    So THAT'S why they keep having to raise the price of a stamp. Uh, wait...

  33. USPS needs to become more shipper-friendly. by argent · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's bunches of online vendors I do business with who I have to use paypal with (if they support it) because they will only ship to my billing address and won't ship to a PO box, and I have my mail sent to a PO box because I've had too much trouble with material sent to my street address going missing.

    I don't know what the underlying reasons that they only use Fedex or UPS are, I just now they're pretty damn pervasive, and I wish the USPS would make them unnecessary.

  34. USPS is also doing a great job... by csoto · · Score: 1

    particularly at using those very same information systems to both improve their services and availability. Have you been to a post office with an automated postal center? They're amazingly easy to use and convenient! A number of commercial sites that would have used UPS or Fedex in the past have used USPS, and I notice no decline in service. In fact, our postal carriers are among the most friendly people that visit our house. They're always helpful.

    I think USPS has only USPS to thank for its improved outlook.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    1. Re:USPS is also doing a great job... by goodcow · · Score: 1

      Funny, the post office literally two doors down from me (in Manhattan) always has horrendous lines which I've called four times now to complain about, and an Automated Postal Center which is broken half the time I go in there.

      To compound things, the APC won't let you send packages via Media Mail anymore, apparently because people were using it to scam the USPS sending non-media items at highly redcued prices, so I have to wait in that horrible line just so a postal employee can stamp it Media Mail without even verifying the box's contents anyway.

    2. Re:USPS is also doing a great job... by andrewman327 · · Score: 1

      The enhanced technology doesn't stop at the APC. See that barcode on all of yoru incoming mail? It is designed to speed up the service by reducing the amount of human handling that occurs. Technology has revolutionized the Postal Service.

      --
      Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  35. Why eBay users all use USPS Priority Mail by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    As mentioned, eBay sellers often use priority email.

    Why? Because the integration between eBay, PayPal, and the USPS is so seemless. With just a few clicks through a few screens a bidder has paid you, and you are printing out a pre-paid shipping label that you stick on a free box the USPS delivered to your door and that you can drop off in special priority mail drop containers that do not require standing in line.

    You can also pre-print other forms of shipping but Priority is generally a little faster (though there is no gaurantee) which means everyone is happier.

    I would say the masterstroke of gettting eBay shippers to primarily use USPS and on top of that use one of the more expensive shipping options means huge profit increases for the USPS. Now instead of sending letters which must generate very little profit they ship more packages with a better margin.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  36. Not to mention proper internet integration by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The postal centers are awesome, but what is even more awesome is that you can access all of those features online as well and just pre-print your postage before you even leave the house - no need to stand in line then. Not to mention the awesome integration with PayPal and eBay.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not to mention proper internet integration by csoto · · Score: 1

      Yes, right. I wasn't merely suggesting the APCs were the only good innovation. Rather, they've become a tight ship such that commercial businesses can depend on them for their livelihoods. Information systems (bar codes, JIT transactions, etc.) are at the heart of this resurgence.

      --
      There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  37. In a word, eBay by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    The internet opened up everyone's junk closet to the world, and we all pay the post office to shift it. They may be losing regular letter postage to email, but parcel mail must be more profitable.

  38. Besides.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its really hard to go postal using E-mail....

  39. .... at protecting people's privacy concerns by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    The survey was specificly about privacy concerns, not quality of service or anything else.

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  40. amen to that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I have to say that I deal with the post office a LOT and I've never had any trouble with their customer service. In ten+ years of buying and selling through the mail, I've had one lost package, and one damaged package, compared to 3 or 4 lost Fed Ex packages, and literally every UPS package has tears, dents, gouges, and severe corner damage--thankfully the things I get sent via UPS aren't fragile (i.e. boxes and bubble mailers).

  41. That's because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the other door isn't a door at all, it's people sneaking in through the lavatory window and making off with the product.

  42. amazon by paughsw · · Score: 1

    amazon has made usps rich

  43. Monopoly grant is a big subsidy by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well the monopoly they have over mail delivery is a pretty big non-cash subsidy, in my book.

    I'm not saying that the USPS isn't pretty good at what it does, and I use them all the time, but let's be honest: they have a market that's protected from competition by law. No private corporation is allowed to carry letters for anything less than (IIRC) twice the USPS rate or $3, whichever is lower.

    That they're self-supporting is good, but they'd really better be considering that nobody is allowed to touch their business area.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  44. Wrong: USPS uses FedEx aircraft! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Er, no.

    You've got that backwards. The USPS doesn't own any planes, and they have a relatively small fleet of trucks for the volume of stuff that they deliver. It's the Postal Service that uses a lot of other people's trucks and planes, not the other way around.

    In particular, a lot of US Mail is shipped on FedEx aircraft. It used to be that a lot of mail was hauled on passenger airplanes (and the passenger airlines used to compete for these contracts, which is a story in itself) but they no longer allow packages on passenger flights for safety/security reasons, so they now put most air mail onto other freight aircraft. FedEx has one of the largest fleets of air-freight craft in the world, so it's natural that they actually do a lot of the transportation.

    See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Postal_ Service#Airline_and_rail_division. All of the air and rail transportation of US Mail is handled under contract, and a fair bit of the over-the-road trucking is as well. It's not cost effective for the USPS to maintain their own fleet of aircraft, when they can just have private companies compete to provide that service to them as contractors.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Wrong: USPS uses FedEx aircraft! by hypnagogue · · Score: 1
      It's not cost effective for the USPS to maintain their own fleet of aircraft, when they can just have private companies compete to provide that service to them as contractors.
      Actually it is cost effective, which is why FedEx does it. I think you may be confusing cost issues with Congressional decree.

      It works like this:
      1) Corporation lobbies Congress.
      2) Congress passes law forbidding "unfair government competition" to corporation.
      3) Government agency contracts corporation.
      4) Profit!
      5) Campaign contributions!
      --
      Liberty you never use is liberty you lose.
  45. So if they're making more profit from parcels... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    why can't they stop stuffing everyone's mailboxes with tons of advertising that no-one reads.

  46. Now all we need is the teleporters.. by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    USPS can make a bomb on shipping peoples teleporters around, then complain about how they're going to go out of buisness..

  47. Hm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what happened to the $0.32 stamp?

    1. Re:Hm? by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      They're in the same place as $.50/per gallon gas (the price when I started driving), gas wars, a gallon of milk for less than a dollar and penny candy, the US $2.00/hr minimum wage and doctor house calls. They only exist "remember when" chain e-mails.

      The USPS didn't make more money because the cost of anything went down. They just got more efficient.

  48. Not a fair comparison by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    I don't know of anyone in the pre-email world who used fax machines for personal correspondence.

    I never wrote a whole lot of letters just because I didn't live that much of my life before email was available, but my parents certainly had whole files of paper letters and would write all the time. Probably still not as often as they send personal emails, so I'd say the amount of communication that people do today via email is greater than what they ever did via mail, but I think you're exaggerating the lengths to which people went to avoid writing letters.

    It's not that much harder to write a letter than it is to send an email, when you're used to it. People had inboxes and outboxes and typing desks and stationery; people were set up to write letters and manage paper documents. Executives and lawyers had professional secretaries who managed correspondence and took dictation. Firing off a letter to someone in a paper-based office wasn't that involved or hard -- everyone was used to it.

    Actually, I would bet that it probably takes less time to turn on a typewriter, insert a sheet of stationery, and start typing a letter, than it does to power up a computer, connect to the Internet via dialup, start an email program, and start writing an email. For the un-technically inclined, it's also a lot less intimidating. It's only recently, with the ubiquitity of always-on computers and Internet connections, that we've clearly achieved greater ease-of-use than the paper-based systems we perfected for decades did (and even then there's room for argument).

    When people think about writing letters today, they think of how much of a pain it would be now, where most of the home and office infrastructure for managing paper has disappeared. People don't have desks with lots of empty space for reading and responding to mail, or file drawers for personal correspondence, or Rolodexes for managing postal addresses. Without that infrastructure, letter-writing is a PITA. Most people today, if they want to write a letter, have to either type it using a computer (making it just as involved as an email), or hand-write it (PITA), find an envelope, find stamps, find a mailbox, etc.

    But that's not really fair. Writing an email would be a pain in the ass too, if you didn't have ready access to a computer, email program, and Internet connection. The way we write paper letters now would be like writing an email by Telnetting into a SMTP server -- we don't use any of the tools or infrastructure that was designed to facilitate that mode of communication.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  49. Thoughts on the USPS by 3gm · · Score: 1

    Obviously, not everyone has the same experience with the USPS. Mine has been very good.

    I ship a fair number of packages. I have a FedEx account and have found that most of my packages are cheapest to send via FedEx Home. I also have a USPS account. I ship USPS when I'm shipping media mail or when the package is lightweight. FedEx rates are generally better for heavier packages (4 pounds up). That's especially true if the ship-to address is a business, if it's not in the boondocks, and if the package needs insurance. One insight into why FedEx might be cheaper is that per wikipedia: "FedEx Express contractually flies a large number of packages for United States Postal Service totaling one billion dollars worth of packages per year, making it one of FedEx's biggest customers".

    USPS has modernized and continues to do so. I recently used the web to have my mail held while I was out of town; worked like a champ. Their other online services are quite good; I just wish I could print more classes of postage/mailing labels online w/o having to use another (expensive) service provider (e.g. stamps.com).

    Rates are up, but they're still much less than rates elsewhere in the world, especially considering the geographic distances involved. Service seems to me to be better too.

    The USPS is head and shoulders above what the old Post Office was years ago. I just hope they continue to improve and innovate.

  50. USPS Facts. by kahrytan · · Score: 1

    United States Postal Service is a self-supporting agency. Their entire goal is to make a profit and not receive one dime from Federal government. They ARE a BUSINESS and they run like a BUSINESS. It is why postage goes up and they modernize. They are in reorganization mode now to increase profits. I just hope they see a need to change package tracking. It sucks.

    Also, Postmaster General is also called CEO of USPS. Read USPS website. You can also read their financials and business plans.

    The reason why USPS has a monopoly on letter delivery is because of the laws. Only two people is allowed access to your mailbox, you and USPS. Those neat little boxes are protected by federal law.

    As for the increase in profits for USPS, I bet it is mostly due to eBay.

    --
    \
  51. Time is money... by badc0ffee · · Score: 1

    The more of your time they waste, the more money they make. Went to the Post office to mail a package. Four out of eight stations open, customer at each, BUT no line! Woo-Hoo, I'm next! Not.
    Customer leaves so does the post-person, another, another, now one window with one customer and 20 people behind me. After waiting 10 minutes, they finally opened a station and the line started moving again.

    Very suckessful business model:
    1-Have a service that requires a queue of customers
    2-Make sure the queue is at the threshold of pain for customer/acceptable loss
    3-Ferengi Magic happens
    4-Profit$

    --
    1011 1010 1101 1100 0000 1111 1111 1110 1110
  52. Blessing in disguise by devic3 · · Score: 1

    The USPS wastes over a billion a year on returned mail.
    Direct marketing and corporate postal customers get postage breaks because them make the mail piece
    machinable. 1st class mail is often handwritten and requires eyes.

    It seems obvious that the USPS would want to score corporate and package delivery business and lose the letters to Santa.

  53. USPS is... by idfubar · · Score: 0

    ...the only government branch "in-the-black".

    --

    Rishi Chopra
    www.rishichopra.org
  54. USPS will be fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    until someone invents a teleporter.

  55. Hawaii and Alaska by wwi · · Score: 1

    Some folks HAVE to use the USPS. Particularly for those of us in Hawai'i (and Alaska), UPS/FEDEX/DHL are insanely expensive. And yes, when an on-line seller won't use the USPS, we just don't do business with them. I can rant for hours about how good Amazon (gasp!) is with USPS shipping, and how bad their "partners" are because most refuse to use USPS.

  56. Totally agree with the idea but... by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

    ...can't ignore this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_United_Sta tes_Postal_Service_rates

    Stamps went up to 0.29 in Feb '91, and up to 0.39 in Jan '06. A 33% increase in 15 years. And that's just the first class rate. So, there's more to this story. Like, the USPS is greedy.

    --
    why? forty-two.
    1. Re:Totally agree with the idea but... by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1
      Stamps went up to 0.29 in Feb '91, and up to 0.39 in Jan '06. A 33% increase in 15 years.

      However, according to the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank, prices rose by 43% between 1991 and 2005, and 49% between 1991 and 2006.

      So, there's more to this story. Like, the USPS is greedy.

      Like, you've been pwn3d.
  57. teleporter by trupoet · · Score: 0

    Yah I've had discussions with my wife and dad about that kind of thing....to do it the star trek way would be too complicated and dangerous....dematerialize matter and be able to re-materialize a person exactly as they were before? Reminds me of "The Fly"...just doesn't seem very possible anytime soon anyway.

    Although bending space/time seems like more of an option....but thats even more out of our grasp....doesn't seem as dangerous but then again, there are other factors to think about besides molecules.

    Anyways I'm just a noob with such topics but enjoy discussing them outside of the Sci-fi world.