The subsidies they are getting are part of the renewable energy program. Are people fucking idiots here? 80% of the companies getting this funding are pulling scams but because it's for some idea people are ok with it. That's like getting raped but saying it's ok because someone felt good about it. Fucking stupidity!!!
When they get $39 million in renewable energy credits from the federal government, does it really matter what they are doing? They are in the renewable game for the money. I am not saying that the idea is bad, just most all players in it are in it for the quick cash. Navistar struggles to make a profit year after year and yet get a $39 million dollar grant. You think that's a good idea? Did you get $39 million to insulate your house?? Hey, but god forbid someone points out the scam of it all. Maybe we should all just go on how you "feel" about it all and not how it actually is?? Because that will really get things done...........
Granted the list was from 2013 and I remembered where I read it when Vestas was trading at 25 bucks a share. I am sure the record Amonix set is impressive, but they have a habit of doing things like this. I could do impressive things too if I was getting that kind of federal funding.
GM went bankrupt because they had $82 billion in assets and $172 billion in liabilities. When the banks when bankrupt, they couldn't get cash, sell assets or sell shares or bonds. Their cars were fine and lean manufacturing had been implemented YEARS before they went bankrupt. Work efficiency wasn't an issue as over half of it's employees are not US employees.
Yes! Banish the heretic deniers with a red "D" on their lapels so that all can see that they will not accept the relig...... I mean science that is climate change! Now lets pra....... I mean discuss they problem!
That's if you think every job is a "living wage" job. These jobs are not meant to support a family. They are either for younger people or supplemental income. They are not meant to be life long jobs. People said this would happen if the push for ridiculous wages for these jobs kept up. It is and now you are mad? And btw, how do you think this guy got "rich"? It's that scary words all the liberal douche bags hate so much HARD WORK!!
That's the stupidity of people now a days. To them they think history started 2 years ago and don't want to listen to the lessons learned from past shortcomings. They deserve to go bankrupt on shear stupidity alone.
More FUD. The data shown in the article shows only the ignition is controllable buy the TGU, the rest is disconnected. I guess you could fool the unit by saying something is fine when it's not, which could lead to costly repairs. Beyond that, more FUD
All those things would be easily cracked with a brute force on the password for those services and I am quite certain the FBI wouldn't be bothered with a warrant to go after them. Between that and what they already have it means they have plenty and would not gain much from getting in to the phone other than to strip the right of more peoples privacy.
I forgot about it being an employer supplied phone. Good point. Still the emails would be easily obtained and active sync would supply most all that is useful on the phone, unless they used a 3 party app, which then the maker of the app would have to be the one to supply that info. I have a hard time believing there would be any "smoking guns" outside what they have already obtained.
After ten failed tries an iPhone can, if turned on, which by default is not, erase all data on the phone. Have a hard time believing that terrorist that throw a hard drive in to a lake thinking it will destroy it would know this about the iPhone AND have it turned on. FBI is just using this as an excuse to get it's claws in something the easy way, and set president in forcing a private company to do it's bidding.
The cell provider gave them their info and Apple gave the FBI the last iCloud back-up for the device, so what more could they actually find on the phone that would be of such a great use? I mean, I have a hard time believing that a couple of people that think throwing a hard drive in to a lake destroys the data on it would have the info on their phone not back-up to iCloud or have used something that is only obtainable from the unlocked phone itself. Add to that the story of the phones pass code changing while in FBI possession, which would be easy to track, and that the reports were that they threw their phones in the lake too. So you can find a 18 year old downloading illegal movies, but you can't track who changed the phone's lock code?? Ahhh yeahhhh, all of it together seems like some overwhelming bullshit.
So I take it you do not understand math or tolerances? When you have a percentage that bad and a tolerance that is bigger then the claimed number it means that the whole method to reach the number is total shit. Your example pretty much proves what I said, that the margin of error has to be less then the difference for the number to be even close to accurate. In the case of the tolerance for the warmest year ever, for it to apply to the 100 meter dash example the margin of error they would claim would have to be.2 seconds to compare, considering there are 1000 milliseconds in a second. When the "margin for error" or what normal people would call the tolerance of error is as high as NASA said it is, even 2010 could end up being not even close to the warmest year ever. It's math, plain and simple. Throw in that satellite data has been ignored even though that has been claimed to be more accurate, makes a reasonable person think the claims are questionable at best, and most likely no where near accurate.
Slashdot Mirror
The subsidies they are getting are part of the renewable energy program. Are people fucking idiots here? 80% of the companies getting this funding are pulling scams but because it's for some idea people are ok with it. That's like getting raped but saying it's ok because someone felt good about it. Fucking stupidity!!!
When they get $39 million in renewable energy credits from the federal government, does it really matter what they are doing? They are in the renewable game for the money. I am not saying that the idea is bad, just most all players in it are in it for the quick cash. Navistar struggles to make a profit year after year and yet get a $39 million dollar grant. You think that's a good idea? Did you get $39 million to insulate your house?? Hey, but god forbid someone points out the scam of it all. Maybe we should all just go on how you "feel" about it all and not how it actually is?? Because that will really get things done...........
Oh, and I hope you get too tired clicking on all those links
Soooo you are too lazy to google it? Here, here, and here.
Granted the list was from 2013 and I remembered where I read it when Vestas was trading at 25 bucks a share. I am sure the record Amonix set is impressive, but they have a habit of doing things like this. I could do impressive things too if I was getting that kind of federal funding.
GM went bankrupt because they had $82 billion in assets and $172 billion in liabilities. When the banks when bankrupt, they couldn't get cash, sell assets or sell shares or bonds. Their cars were fine and lean manufacturing had been implemented YEARS before they went bankrupt. Work efficiency wasn't an issue as over half of it's employees are not US employees.
Yes because those are the only renewable energy companies to take tax dollars and fail or are failing.
Signed
Evergreen Solar ($25 million)
SpectraWatt ($500,000)
Solyndra ($535 million)
Beacon Power ($43 million)
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)
A123 Systems ($279 million)
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Schneider Electric ($86 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)
Range Fuels ($80 million)
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)
So two dollars then?
Sooooo why isn't the same thing happening in the Arctic then?
Yes! Banish the heretic deniers with a red "D" on their lapels so that all can see that they will not accept the relig...... I mean science that is climate change! Now lets pra....... I mean discuss they problem!
Sounds like the start of negotiations. Counter offer with a dollar.
Ah yeahhhh not much of a fan of history huh?
That's if you think every job is a "living wage" job. These jobs are not meant to support a family. They are either for younger people or supplemental income. They are not meant to be life long jobs. People said this would happen if the push for ridiculous wages for these jobs kept up. It is and now you are mad? And btw, how do you think this guy got "rich"? It's that scary words all the liberal douche bags hate so much HARD WORK!!
Oh my gosh, we feel so bad for them....
Signed,
No one in Detroit.
That's the stupidity of people now a days. To them they think history started 2 years ago and don't want to listen to the lessons learned from past shortcomings. They deserve to go bankrupt on shear stupidity alone.
More FUD. The data shown in the article shows only the ignition is controllable buy the TGU, the rest is disconnected. I guess you could fool the unit by saying something is fine when it's not, which could lead to costly repairs. Beyond that, more FUD
Wait, what does this mean for climate change and net neutrality? OH LOOK! A SQUIRREL!
I think Hilliary prefers triangles......
What did they ask due to buggy code? Must use Cortana........
All those things would be easily cracked with a brute force on the password for those services and I am quite certain the FBI wouldn't be bothered with a warrant to go after them. Between that and what they already have it means they have plenty and would not gain much from getting in to the phone other than to strip the right of more peoples privacy.
Phone call would be obtainable from the cell provider. No need to get in the phone for that.
I forgot about it being an employer supplied phone. Good point. Still the emails would be easily obtained and active sync would supply most all that is useful on the phone, unless they used a 3 party app, which then the maker of the app would have to be the one to supply that info. I have a hard time believing there would be any "smoking guns" outside what they have already obtained.
After ten failed tries an iPhone can, if turned on, which by default is not, erase all data on the phone. Have a hard time believing that terrorist that throw a hard drive in to a lake thinking it will destroy it would know this about the iPhone AND have it turned on. FBI is just using this as an excuse to get it's claws in something the easy way, and set president in forcing a private company to do it's bidding.
The cell provider gave them their info and Apple gave the FBI the last iCloud back-up for the device, so what more could they actually find on the phone that would be of such a great use? I mean, I have a hard time believing that a couple of people that think throwing a hard drive in to a lake destroys the data on it would have the info on their phone not back-up to iCloud or have used something that is only obtainable from the unlocked phone itself. Add to that the story of the phones pass code changing while in FBI possession, which would be easy to track, and that the reports were that they threw their phones in the lake too. So you can find a 18 year old downloading illegal movies, but you can't track who changed the phone's lock code?? Ahhh yeahhhh, all of it together seems like some overwhelming bullshit.
I am pretty certain Mcafee is working some amnesty angle here.
So I take it you do not understand math or tolerances? When you have a percentage that bad and a tolerance that is bigger then the claimed number it means that the whole method to reach the number is total shit. Your example pretty much proves what I said, that the margin of error has to be less then the difference for the number to be even close to accurate. In the case of the tolerance for the warmest year ever, for it to apply to the 100 meter dash example the margin of error they would claim would have to be .2 seconds to compare, considering there are 1000 milliseconds in a second. When the "margin for error" or what normal people would call the tolerance of error is as high as NASA said it is, even 2010 could end up being not even close to the warmest year ever. It's math, plain and simple. Throw in that satellite data has been ignored even though that has been claimed to be more accurate, makes a reasonable person think the claims are questionable at best, and most likely no where near accurate.