Maybe that's the difference between a President who can't string three words together in a sentence and one who is a University of Chicago professor.
But just look at the second TARP release. Republicans who voted for the measure the first time voted against it because they didn't want Obama to get the right to waste it like Bush did. The issues didn't change. But the votes did. As for Republicans dealing with Democratic congresses Regan and Tip O' Neil played poker in the White House. They were political adversaries but good friends. Can you imagine Newt Gingrich doing that with Bill Clinton?
If Obama doesn't deliver his supporters will eat him alive. (Metaphorically). Bush on the other hand was supported not because of what he did but because he was one of his supporters. Obama could still clusterfuck up like JFK did with Vietnam, but it's not likely.
You use a medical anatomy textbook. Look, they don't need to know how to perform butakke or what the fur fetish is in that much detail. Or you draw a diagram. "This is the clitoris. Use the tongue and lips until she reaches orgasm, then..."
So when a factory owner forces his workers to work 14 hour days he can say "to stop them from doing so would compromise their freedom". We have a welfare state because starving to death because you got a broken arm and no savings is far worse then paying higher taxes. The welfare state is like the little guard on a circular saw: yeah it's annoying, and you might be able to get more done without it, but one day you will thank it for saving you.
R has vector operations. Every operator works componentwise on a vector, and does the right thing with scalars. This makes vector heavy code easier and clearer to write.
The real situation is that people like you crawl out of the woodwork to defend corrupt, selfish, and short-sighted criminal leadership in the name of stability. There is no excuse for silencing the citizens, no excuse for sitting on a throne of bayonets. When a man is killed by the police at a protest, the man who shot him is a murderer. The state would protect him by locking him up, rather then the man who is sent to kill him. When the starving shout for food, the freezing for warmth, the forgotten for someone to care, remember that the whispers of revolution will follow any silence.
Russia is a bit smarter then a frog. And if you can find a nuclear sub that doesn't want to be found without sending enough ships that it's obvious you win. By the way the US was much touchier then the USSR during the Cold War. If the USSR had blockaded SE Asia, or overflown US airspace, there would have been war. The Korean War almost expanded into China with nukes. But if you want to eliminate the risk of nuclear war three things need to happen:
You need to have a credible collective security mechanism
Nations should be able to trust that compliance with treaties will protect them from war.
Expand the benefits of the current international order so fewer people want to destabilize it.
Currently none of this is happening. Our invasion of Iraq made it clear that compliance won't save you. Right now intelligent people argue in the NY Times that Indians should not drive cars, because of the CO2 emissions. They probably drive. And what does the Football War say about collective security?
Are you crazy? If Russia cannot nuke us, why won't we nuke them first? They will have to launch before the shield becomes active if it is a perfect shield. A SSBM would knock out so much and this system is useless against it. If NK gets a nuclear submarine its back to MAD. In the meantime we have completely destroyed the nonproliferation structure, arms limitations, and developed dangerous nukes. The world is a much scarier place because someone couldn't think about long term consequences.
Every nation does that. The French government in particular is known for industrial espionage to benefit French companies. Does that mean we have a cold war with France?
Or the ex-Nazi's who bombed Piazza Fortana in 1968. Or the American public who supported a gang of thugs who attempted to topple a democratically elected government in Nicaragua. If this is sophistication, pray for the sake of the world that we have more naivety.
And 1 billion people still shit in the water they drink. What does it say about the richest country on Earth when people sleep under bridges? What does it say about us as people when we are so willing to turn our backs on the less fortunate? The measure of a nation is not in how it treats the powerful and the wealthy, but the poor and unfortunate. And by that measure we have failed.
There is a workaround: Make your own compiler. It can be as slow as you want, but the important thing is it cannot be targeted by a nefarious compiler. Now compile gcc with it. Then use your new gcc to compile gcc. This newest gcc should be the same as the starting gcc. If not it was tampered with. You can even use an untrusted compiler if it has a different hack in it. For CPU's you can trust that no one in Intel understands the thing well enough to do that, or use a simple CPU like a MIPS or a SPARC. Take a SPARC chip and dissect it under the microscope and compare to the mask patterns Sun released. And DRAM is easy to analyze: It should have a bunch of similar cells and a small addressing part. Ethernet is a bit trickier, so I recommend using a parallel port and tunneling IP over it. Then be sure to work only in a Faraday cage, letting only optical signals through the mesh.
Trading off security? The fact of the matter is that security holes are problems whether your competitors and the mafia can exploit them or just your competitors.
So when we say that government needs to protect us from those who would enslave us, asking everyone to contribute is going to lead to slavery?
Maybe that's the difference between a President who can't string three words together in a sentence and one who is a University of Chicago professor.
But just look at the second TARP release. Republicans who voted for the measure the first time voted against it because they didn't want Obama to get the right to waste it like Bush did. The issues didn't change. But the votes did. As for Republicans dealing with Democratic congresses Regan and Tip O' Neil played poker in the White House. They were political adversaries but good friends. Can you imagine Newt Gingrich doing that with Bill Clinton?
If Obama doesn't deliver his supporters will eat him alive. (Metaphorically). Bush on the other hand was supported not because of what he did but because he was one of his supporters. Obama could still clusterfuck up like JFK did with Vietnam, but it's not likely.
The Lancet survey.
You use a medical anatomy textbook. Look, they don't need to know how to perform butakke or what the fur fetish is in that much detail. Or you draw a diagram. "This is the clitoris. Use the tongue and lips until she reaches orgasm, then ..."
So when a factory owner forces his workers to work 14 hour days he can say "to stop them from doing so would compromise their freedom". We have a welfare state because starving to death because you got a broken arm and no savings is far worse then paying higher taxes. The welfare state is like the little guard on a circular saw: yeah it's annoying, and you might be able to get more done without it, but one day you will thank it for saving you.
R has vector operations. Every operator works componentwise on a vector, and does the right thing with scalars. This makes vector heavy code easier and clearer to write.
The real situation is that people like you crawl out of the woodwork to defend corrupt, selfish, and short-sighted criminal leadership in the name of stability. There is no excuse for silencing the citizens, no excuse for sitting on a throne of bayonets. When a man is killed by the police at a protest, the man who shot him is a murderer. The state would protect him by locking him up, rather then the man who is sent to kill him. When the starving shout for food, the freezing for warmth, the forgotten for someone to care, remember that the whispers of revolution will follow any silence.
How does presenting the liver help?
Currently none of this is happening. Our invasion of Iraq made it clear that compliance won't save you. Right now intelligent people argue in the NY Times that Indians should not drive cars, because of the CO2 emissions. They probably drive. And what does the Football War say about collective security?
He should learn Algo 68. Then he should implement a compiler for it. That will teach him how to program.
Win32 is the windows API. Making perl for .NET will be fun. Thankfully Parrot will rope other people into doing most of it.
Are you crazy? If Russia cannot nuke us, why won't we nuke them first? They will have to launch before the shield becomes active if it is a perfect shield. A SSBM would knock out so much and this system is useless against it. If NK gets a nuclear submarine its back to MAD. In the meantime we have completely destroyed the nonproliferation structure, arms limitations, and developed dangerous nukes. The world is a much scarier place because someone couldn't think about long term consequences.
Actually that would apply to Schroedinger's equation in the case of the helium atom or anything with more then two particles interacting.
Haven't you read Infinite Jest?
Every nation does that. The French government in particular is known for industrial espionage to benefit French companies. Does that mean we have a cold war with France?
Or the ex-Nazi's who bombed Piazza Fortana in 1968. Or the American public who supported a gang of thugs who attempted to topple a democratically elected government in Nicaragua. If this is sophistication, pray for the sake of the world that we have more naivety.
Since Bernstein sued crypto can be exported without restriction.
Yes it is. But it was not tried before, except at the French Universities, the Paris Commune, and in Barcelona before the May Days.
You are completely wrong. Read what Marx himself said before you sprout off about "getting nothing". Isn't being your own boss worth something?
And 1 billion people still shit in the water they drink. What does it say about the richest country on Earth when people sleep under bridges? What does it say about us as people when we are so willing to turn our backs on the less fortunate? The measure of a nation is not in how it treats the powerful and the wealthy, but the poor and unfortunate. And by that measure we have failed.
There is a workaround: Make your own compiler. It can be as slow as you want, but the important thing is it cannot be targeted by a nefarious compiler. Now compile gcc with it. Then use your new gcc to compile gcc. This newest gcc should be the same as the starting gcc. If not it was tampered with. You can even use an untrusted compiler if it has a different hack in it. For CPU's you can trust that no one in Intel understands the thing well enough to do that, or use a simple CPU like a MIPS or a SPARC. Take a SPARC chip and dissect it under the microscope and compare to the mask patterns Sun released. And DRAM is easy to analyze: It should have a bunch of similar cells and a small addressing part. Ethernet is a bit trickier, so I recommend using a parallel port and tunneling IP over it. Then be sure to work only in a Faraday cage, letting only optical signals through the mesh.
You can write it and not sign it but don't expect anyone to read it.
Trading off security? The fact of the matter is that security holes are problems whether your competitors and the mafia can exploit them or just your competitors.
The point of teaching math is for use in doing math, not physics.