Slashdot Mirror


User: TheReverand

TheReverand's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
380
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 380

  1. Re:No Way on AOL Protects Kids From Liberals · · Score: 1

    The $1,000 cap is for a candidate I think. You can give as much as you want to the DNC its the same as buying lobbyists. I may be wrong though.

  2. Re:Voodoo5 is *NOT* Hercules compatible! on 3dfx Voodoo5 vs NVIDIA GeForce Preview · · Score: 1

    You know this is the funniest shit all night moderate it up.

  3. Re:You know who should be suing on Apple Possibly Pursuing Another iMac-look Clone · · Score: 1
    I am seeking compatability with things like plain text display. Got any ideas?

    Yes upgrade your computer to something that was built in the 90's and get some software along with it so you can read formatted text.

    Asshole.

  4. Re:Telephone anyone? on ABCNews:Potential Recommended MS Break-Up · · Score: 2
    "Hey Mike, what are we gonna write about today?

    "Gee George, there's no riots in Miami today, and Elian is hidden from us."

    "I got it Mike, let's play speculation!"

    "Yeah ok......I got one, Elian spotted at local McDonald's sexually harassing female employees."

    "How about, New evidence points that the trenchcoat Mafia was worshipping Satan while listening to Brittany Spears before shooting up Columbine."

    "No how about an MS breakup speculation...here we go, People familiar with the case have said........

  5. Re:Nasty bit of transitivity there. on Japan Makes Linking Illegal Material Illegal · · Score: 1
    The pellet with the poison's in the vestle with the pestle, the flagon with the dragon has the brew that is true...........

    Sorry all this circle talk is driving me loopy.

  6. Smart != Computer Guru on AOLization of America · · Score: 2

    that the average person isn't as smart as the average /. reader Do you read the posts on slashdot? The average Slash reader is a regurgitating moron who doesn't have an original thought in his/her head. There are many brilliant people here (I am not one of them) but they are far overshadowed by the trolls/zealots (which as far as I am concerned are about equal). Just because people may have had other things to accomplish in their lives before someone decided that we all had to be online to count for anything does not mean that they are not intelligent people. I mean come on everyone was a newbie at some point, NOONE is born with some innate ability to code perl. It's time you people got off your collective high-horses and realized the REAL problem with AOL, that being the fact that they will be supplying content to some 35 million people by the end of this year. *sigh*/rant off _marc

  7. Re:The REDHAT-owns-you red herring on Caldera CEO Says Linux Is Proprietary · · Score: 1
    My point was not RedHat in particular. But why they started has nothing to do with who they are now. They are currently a business with responsibilities to their stockholders. You can be damn sure that they care about making money and building the communities trust. Otherwise they would NOT have IPO'ed in the first place.

    -Marc

  8. Re:doubtful.. on Caldera CEO Says Linux Is Proprietary · · Score: 1
    If RedHat did try to close everything up, nevermind the fact that they can't actually do this because they didn't write all, or even most of the code,

    In this hypothetical situation, who is going to stop them?

    create a new, OPEN, distro that offers all the same features as RedHat's distro, but has the added advantage of being open,

    Sorry but I have yet to meet a manager that gives a damn about OPEN. There is a reason that MS is still selling products. Obviously not because they are better, and not because there are no alternatives, but because they are there at all. Everyone knows that MS will be around for a while and even if DOJ broke them up, there would still be a company there to support them.

    If such a hypothetical situation did occur, a new Distro would be right where the small distro's are now, fighting for there 3% against the RedHat 80%. (And let me note again that I am not accusing or implying anything about RedHat I am just using them as an example, you could exchange RedHat for any other Distro in any of these posts)

    Marc

  9. Re:proh-pry-et-airy on Caldera CEO Says Linux Is Proprietary · · Score: 1

    Take out RedHat and insert [Any Major Linux Distro] and you could have the same thing. Especially with stocks falling investors will get very upset about non-positive earnings. One or more of the Distro's may try just that approach.

  10. Re:proh-pry-et-airy on Caldera CEO Says Linux Is Proprietary · · Score: 1
    You're right the code they had already released. However if RedHat was a heavy player competing on a Sun/Apple/MS level, people would gladly pay for the "upgrades" etc....AND since the GPL has not been tested in court it would be unlikely to have any effect on RedHat. And since there were no other Linux companies to compete, who are you going to get any Linux Distro from? Actually you don't matter, where is Fortune 500 Company 2005 going to get all of their Software from? Not from Joe Hacker but from Big respected Proven RedHat. (I am not saying that RedHat is acting like this just using them as an example) Now you have an MS of the Linux world. But maybe it won't be Linux anymore, maybe it will be *gasp* RedHatOS. Suddenly RedHat has a hold on the market and Linux goes back to being a hacker's toy. Then it will be time for Revux `;^).

    -Marc

  11. Re:proh-pry-et-airy on Caldera CEO Says Linux Is Proprietary · · Score: 1
    "Hmmm under this definition, Linux is NOT proprietary. It's not private, not exclusively owned, not owned by a private individual or corporation under a trademark or patent..."

    From Redhat.com

    Red Hat, the Red Hat "Shadow Man" logo, RPM, Maximum RPM, the RPM logo, Linux Library, PowerTools, Linux Undercover, RHmember, RHmember More, Rough Cuts, Rawhide and all Red Hat-based trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Red Hat, Inc. in the United States and other countries.

    SPARC is a registered trademark of SPARC International, Inc. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based on an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc.

    Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.

    All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

    Maybe this is what he was talking about? What if RedHat became THE Linux Distro that everyone used? Couldn't they at some point say damn the GPL our stuff is our stuff? (a stretch I know but this is probably what is feared).

    -Marc

  12. Re:More than just the source on BeOS Boo-Boo: Violating The GPL -- Updated · · Score: 1
    Statement retracted.

    thanks for informing without flaming

    -Marc

  13. Re:If it is unintentional.... on BeOS Boo-Boo: Violating The GPL -- Updated · · Score: 1
    That's the most ridiculous comparison I have ever seen. GPL violation != MSEULA violation in ANY way. How did you get the MS source? You can't legally unless you sign an NDA of some kind so you would be violating a completely different set of rules. Also since you do not "sell" GPL'd code, damages will be very hard to prove, as opposed to closed source which could be construed as damaging to the authoring company (e.g. Norton V. MCaffee) Just couldn't get through a story without mentioning MS could you?

    Moderate the above back down as flamebait.

  14. Re:If it is unintentional.... on BeOS Boo-Boo: Violating The GPL -- Updated · · Score: 3
    "they have already promised to fix the problem"

    Then what example needs to be made? All you seem to have done is whip slashdot into a frenzy that I'm sure will cause more than a few hate mails to arrive in someones inbox at BE. This company would need to be made an example of if they refused to do anything about their violations. Instead you have treated them like children, going and shouting to the rest of the class, "Hey guys hey guys Johnny isn't playing fair!!". This story should NOT have come out the way it did.

    -Marc

    Flame all you want....I'll Post more

  15. Re:Before you even start on BeOS Boo-Boo: Violating The GPL -- Updated · · Score: 1
    Did you ask them for the source?

    Did they say no?

    What rule have they broken then?

    I haven't seen any proof that they have actually violated the *GPL yet..(If there is any let me know and I will gladly retract the previous statements...)

    -Marc

  16. Re:hmm... on Star Wars EP1 On DVD Confirmed By Lucas · · Score: 1
    Because the firm was racist.

    What does John Grisham have to do with this?

    -Marc

  17. Re:A marketing Genius! on Star Wars EP1 On DVD Confirmed By Lucas · · Score: 1
    Heh My girlfriend bought the Tae-bo DVD.

    "Honey it was a great deal all 3 plus a bonus movie for $50!!!!"

  18. Re:Who's this "you"? on SecurityFocus Responds To ESR Column On OSS Security · · Score: 1
    Installing the latest bugfix is simply a different terminology for what Micros~1 callsd "upgrading," and it doesn't (usually) cost a damn thing.

    MS's hotfixes and service packs are also free.

    YOUR ignorance also borders on FUD.

  19. Re:Liability shift? on SecurityFocus Responds To ESR Column On OSS Security · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, in most small to medium size businesses, noone takes the rap. Instead a consulting firm is brought in to solve the problems. (Lucky for us this usually involves firing people and bringing in our own that we can trust) I find it amazing who is getting hired nowadays to administer mission-critical servers. I would say 60% of the people I meet on sites aren't qualified to administer the fries at McDonald's, let alone a linux or NT box. So unfortunately you ARE going to have a lot of people Waiting for RedHat.

  20. Re:Liability shift? on SecurityFocus Responds To ESR Column On OSS Security · · Score: 1
    But if the average user has become more "user than coder", I think you are gonna see more users waiting for a bug fix from RedHat or whoever. Now true maybe these people shouldn't be administering Linux, but tell that to some supervisor after his machine has been cracked because his or her Linux admin couldn't "*fix it themselves*".

  21. Re:The other benefit of OSS on SecurityFocus Responds To ESR Column On OSS Security · · Score: 2

    Why has this been moderated up so high? This person is stating a blatant falsehood, as the bug s/he is referring to had a workaround the same day. Microsoft releases hot-fixes all the time if you pay attention to lists like ntbugtraq. Moderators stop encouraging flame wars.

  22. Re:Cancer vs. AIDS research on NASA + NCI = Nano-Explorers For Humans · · Score: 1
    (I dimly recall that they might be called 'rotoviruses')

    The correct term is retrovirus.

    -marc

  23. Re:inner space? on NASA + NCI = Nano-Explorers For Humans · · Score: 1
    Martin Short was in Inner Space.

  24. Re:Cancer vs. AIDS research on NASA + NCI = Nano-Explorers For Humans · · Score: 2

    Obviously you have never heard of Liver, skin or the other types of cancer that exist. One of the worst being Leukemia which strikes randomly. Or how about esophagle(sp) cancer that my friend is dying of? Yeah he really lived it up not smoking or drinking his whole life.

  25. Computer Companies and Charities on How Socially Responsible Are Computer Companies? · · Score: 2
    Here Is an interesting article from Salon about large companies donatin to charity. Included are HP, IBM and MS. It's dated but relevant.

    Here is a little more recent set of numbers for MS, HP, IBM, Oracle, Apple and some others.

    It even talks about Bill's personal charity foundation.

    -Marc