It were 2 updates in the first run (new windows installer and new update-system), then 67 critical patches in the second run, then 6 critical patches in the third run.
Hm, i can't see your problem. Do the following:
1. Go to xrost.biz . Register (it's free). Buy one of their certificates (called icard) with your Visa.
2. Note down the serial-number of the icard and the PIN of the icard.
3. Go to allofmp3.com and log into your account (or create a new one).
4. Click on "balance". Click on "refill balance".
5. Click on "Refill with XROST-ICARD"
6. Enter number and PIN from 2
7. PROFIT!!!!!
The Protokoll is poorly documented?!
What have you been smoking? The RFCs are out there, with a full documentation of each and every single possible bit.
no, it would not.
Mozilla does not provide security-patches to old releases; they insist on really upgrading ( Firefox 1.05 has a security-problem -> upgrade to 1.0.7 [with tons of added features which introduce new bugs]).
Debian has its stable-branch, where _every_ piece of software stays as it is, plus security-fixes.
Debian needs the right to patch firefox to achieve their goals.
images don'fall under the GPL.
The GPL only talks about source-code (see GPL paragraph 1).
This basically is a dispute over GPL paragraph 2 a: if i apply my own pathes to Firefox, does 2 a allow me to still call it Firefox?
and broadens the fricking window of vulnarability.
Debian allready sends _ALL_ patches to upstream; most of the security-patches are taken from upstream.
I always try to respond;-)
That sort of thing still works in germany, yes. It may take some time to get the papers in order, but should not take longer than two months.
It is extremely unlikely that they succeed, yes. However, there is a chance.
They are bound by law to follow EVERY lead they have. This lead will end right at the servers.
Oh yeah, we stopped searching for that murder. Ok, we got his fingerprints, but we would have to find a suspect to try a match on him, and that is pretty annoying.
As long as we don't know that the prosecutors knew that it were tor-servers with no information whatsoever on them, it is just standard-procedure:
1.found childporn-forum
2.get the logfiles from the forum
3.get your hands on every machine mentioned in the logfiles to find additional evidence
It is important to note that the servers were siezed after a judge autorized the siezure. Once they notice that they cannot gain any info from the servers, they will be returned.
They were siezed as evidence. The prosecutors monitored a forum where childporn was traded and basically siezed every computer whoose IP was in the logs.
There is some controversity on this siezure, as there are rumors that the prosecutors knew that they won't find anything on a tor-node.
It is important to note that none of the tor-nodes-owners has been charged with anything; running tor on a server is NOT the reason these people were targetted.
These are pure lies by Microsoft to gain some PR-advantage against the European Union.
The EU has issued a statement that the release-date of Vista is 100% in the hands of Microsoft and that it does not intend to interfere(see http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/77945 for a german news-post about it). The EU had issued in january a questionaire to MS about the conformity of Vista to the several sentences MS got because of it's monopoly. MS answered LAST WEEK.
This is not different to the US-market: MS has to conform to certain rules because of several past lawsuits. MS knew this from the start. If it does not conform, it is 100% MS's fault.
Actually, it's much easier without the source code, although the results are probably a lot less accurate.
Care to elaborate on that one?
Can one make an analysis of the Produkt not using the Source Code? OSS: Yes. CSS: Yes.
Can one make an analysis of the Produkt using the Source Code? OSS: Yes. CSS: NO.
Ubuntu runs well and upgrades as gracefully as Debian.
Not really true. Upgrading from woody to sarge (which is a HUGE upgrade) resultet in no big problems for me on my desktop.
Upgrading from 5.10 to 6.06 resultet in:
-Wlan not working (freezing the whole system -> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/linux -source-2.6.15/+bug/35474 )
-Sound-system has some incredible lags (~2 seconds)
Funny thing is, there are three ways to fix the wlan; however, the fixes will not be included in 6.06. Perhaps i will be lucky with 6.10, but till then, Debian testing is my distro of choice.
I live in europe, you insensitive clod;-)
It depends on your outlook on life: if 200$ are so important for you that you accept working in a hostile environment, good for you.
I choose a positive environment for my job; after all, i spend more than half of my waking hours there.
Slashdot Mirror
Well, they _ARE_ optional. I don't care about WMP 10 and .net-framework 2.
It were 2 updates in the first run (new windows installer and new update-system), then 67 critical patches in the second run, then 6 critical patches in the third run.
The second you laugh because of maddoxx, you know that you have become a man. Geek man, but man nonetheless.
You have same choice you have now with the GPLv2: Use my code, but abide to my rules, or don't use my code.
Try F.E.A.R. . It had me sleepless for some nights; without the usual "monster being teleported right behind you" cheap stuff.
Hm, i can't see your problem. Do the following: 1. Go to xrost.biz . Register (it's free). Buy one of their certificates (called icard) with your Visa. 2. Note down the serial-number of the icard and the PIN of the icard. 3. Go to allofmp3.com and log into your account (or create a new one). 4. Click on "balance". Click on "refill balance". 5. Click on "Refill with XROST-ICARD" 6. Enter number and PIN from 2 7. PROFIT!!!!!
Why is it dead? If you want to continue to use VISA, go to XROST, buy a XROST-giftcertificate, which you then redeem at allofmp3.com .
The Protokoll is poorly documented?! What have you been smoking? The RFCs are out there, with a full documentation of each and every single possible bit.
no, it would not. Mozilla does not provide security-patches to old releases; they insist on really upgrading ( Firefox 1.05 has a security-problem -> upgrade to 1.0.7 [with tons of added features which introduce new bugs]). Debian has its stable-branch, where _every_ piece of software stays as it is, plus security-fixes. Debian needs the right to patch firefox to achieve their goals.
images don'fall under the GPL. The GPL only talks about source-code (see GPL paragraph 1). This basically is a dispute over GPL paragraph 2 a: if i apply my own pathes to Firefox, does 2 a allow me to still call it Firefox?
and broadens the fricking window of vulnarability. Debian allready sends _ALL_ patches to upstream; most of the security-patches are taken from upstream.
it is moslem in most european countries.
I always try to respond ;-)
That sort of thing still works in germany, yes. It may take some time to get the papers in order, but should not take longer than two months.
I am so looking forward to this weekend: my fiancée and I will play Lego Star-Wars from episode 4 till 6.
It is extremely unlikely that they succeed, yes. However, there is a chance. They are bound by law to follow EVERY lead they have. This lead will end right at the servers.
Oh yeah, we stopped searching for that murder. Ok, we got his fingerprints, but we would have to find a suspect to try a match on him, and that is pretty annoying.
As long as we don't know that the prosecutors knew that it were tor-servers with no information whatsoever on them, it is just standard-procedure:
1.found childporn-forum
2.get the logfiles from the forum
3.get your hands on every machine mentioned in the logfiles to find additional evidence
It is important to note that the servers were siezed after a judge autorized the siezure. Once they notice that they cannot gain any info from the servers, they will be returned.
They were siezed as evidence. The prosecutors monitored a forum where childporn was traded and basically siezed every computer whoose IP was in the logs. There is some controversity on this siezure, as there are rumors that the prosecutors knew that they won't find anything on a tor-node. It is important to note that none of the tor-nodes-owners has been charged with anything; running tor on a server is NOT the reason these people were targetted.
These are pure lies by Microsoft to gain some PR-advantage against the European Union. The EU has issued a statement that the release-date of Vista is 100% in the hands of Microsoft and that it does not intend to interfere(see http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/77945 for a german news-post about it). The EU had issued in january a questionaire to MS about the conformity of Vista to the several sentences MS got because of it's monopoly. MS answered LAST WEEK. This is not different to the US-market: MS has to conform to certain rules because of several past lawsuits. MS knew this from the start. If it does not conform, it is 100% MS's fault.
Film at 11!
I live in europe, you insensitive clod ;-)
It depends on your outlook on life: if 200$ are so important for you that you accept working in a hostile environment, good for you.
I choose a positive environment for my job; after all, i spend more than half of my waking hours there.