That's not talk. It's a belief. And that statement appeared long before YOU, barbarians, started to treat people like shit, like it does not matter.
I do not care about bad Muslims, or what Muslims do wrong. I do not follow other Muslims, in contrary Muslims should follow Islam.
Nothing is Islam is decided by popular vote. So your
> ultimately established a state where non-Arabs were very much inferior
is completely irrelevant. Cleaning the house wolrdwide means cleaning Muslims lands out of Saudi scumbag royal family as well.
>My civilization has had its ups and downs
You don't have one. You have bunch of plutocrats that brainwashed your stupid brain into liberal demagogery, to destroy your family, your connections, your ideology, anything that would prevent you to be a nutbolt in their capitalistic machinery.
And that's all there is to it to your stupid "civilization" and your stupid "ideology".
>and so I'll stand by it.
You stand on nothing. Saying I am standing on this does not mean anything if this "this" is it by itself.
I have a system of beliefs. You have bunch of unrelated man made principles, that collide each other and bite your collective Western ass every single time you said liberalism and democracy in one single sentence.
The problem is not that your are atheist, the problem with you is you are BRAINLESS atheist. And that's the only thing insulting to me.
When I talk to you, you should put your hands on the schoold desk, and keep your spine straight.
Understood?
Now get lost. You obviously have more time on your hands than me, loser.
>So on these matters, the West can and should work together with China
I have zero interest in your theories of how West should cooperate in China in fighting my brothers. Part of Islam is a belief that eventually, the rule of Shariah will be establish all over the world under a single righteous Khalifah, so all your "successes" are temporary, and all our victories are permanent. A Mujahid wins in both outcomes of the battle: whether he dies fighting or he wins fighting.
So shove your theories up your fat ass.
> it won't be a fundamentalist Muslim country. Because religious fundamentalism is inherently incompatible with technical progress
You are a moron.
>barbarians
Barbarians are those who remove taboos from their lives, like Westerners. The human being is defined not but what he does, but rather what he does not di, never, at no circumstances. You have a illogic notion that removal of taboos, which what your stinking liberal freedoms are, is a sign of "progress", "civilization", that stopping enforcing those taboos in society somehow makes you more "civilized", that automatic mercy to killers is a sign of "humanism"
I am not talking here about calling each other names. I know myself and I know Islam, I know my hard core fundamentalist Shariah supporting, head-chopping loving friends: doctors, programmers, taxi drivers, businesmen. My friend is a heart surgeon, quite famous right in the center of the Empire of Evil. He fully supports Shariah Hudd.
So, please stop being juvenile and lie to yourself about barbarism.
1400 years ago the Prophet, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam said in his truly historic Last Sermon:
All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action.
Long after that your predecessors, Barbarians, invaded West Africa and sold the population of slaves to cowboys, your predecessors, in US, which until the end of 1960s were treated like shit in civilized country.
Long after that, your civilized brethren developed a concept of Nation-State.
Long after that you allowed a shitty small tribe of Jews with truly Barbarian cavemen ideology of nationalism dominate the politics of your "civilized" work.
So, please, with the sugar on the top, don't make laugh with your juvenile labels, dimwit.
It's exactly because of what you mentioned that Christian government is a fail.
Historically, Jesus Christ did not create a single government, his pupils did after they rather liberally interpreted his teachings to the extent that many people call Christians Paulians.
There are more Muslims percentage wise acknowledging that their governmetns do not follow Shariah, than Americans acknowledging that US government does not follow constitution.
All of those countries are ruled by deviants. Iran is ruled by Shiah polytheists. Saudi Arabia rulers only pretend the obey only Allah, the rest are just plain vanilla Western lackeys.
There are only two places that follow Sharia: al-Shabab controlled territory in Somalia and Taliban controlled territory in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Now who will complain about evil carriers in US after you will get a perspective of what they do in Ethiopia?:-)
Jokes aside, Islam (Ethiopia has 3 times more Muslims than in 100% Muslim Somalia) prohibits prying and spying on civilians, so any snooping, any PATRIOT act, any FISA laws would be impossible under Islamic government.
They might prohibit certain services altogether to prevent spread of lewdness, but they won't spy on you.
A man peeped through a hole in the door of Allah's Apostle's house , and at that time, Allah's Apostle had a Midri (an iron comb or bar) with which he was rubbing his head. So when Allah's Apostle saw him, he said (to him), "If I had been sure that you were looking at me (through the door), I would have poked your eye with this (sharp iron bar)." Allah's Apostle added, "The asking for permission to enter has been enjoined so that one may not look unlawfully (at what there is in the house without the permission of its people)."
I am not smoking anything, but I also do not know anything about corn production. My comment was on general policy in agricultural subsidies. So please share your corn ideas here without any fear of my comments.
Slashdot Mirror
>Talk is cheap.
That's not talk. It's a belief. And that statement appeared long before YOU, barbarians, started to treat people like shit, like it does not matter.
I do not care about bad Muslims, or what Muslims do wrong. I do not follow other Muslims, in contrary Muslims should follow Islam.
Nothing is Islam is decided by popular vote. So your
> ultimately established a state where non-Arabs were very much inferior
is completely irrelevant. Cleaning the house wolrdwide means cleaning Muslims lands out of Saudi scumbag royal family as well.
>My civilization has had its ups and downs
You don't have one. You have bunch of plutocrats that brainwashed your stupid brain into liberal demagogery, to destroy your family, your connections, your ideology, anything that would prevent you to be a nutbolt in their capitalistic machinery.
And that's all there is to it to your stupid "civilization" and your stupid "ideology".
>and so I'll stand by it.
You stand on nothing. Saying I am standing on this does not mean anything if this "this" is it by itself.
I have a system of beliefs. You have bunch of unrelated man made principles, that collide each other and bite your collective Western ass every single time you said liberalism and democracy in one single sentence.
The problem is not that your are atheist, the problem with you is you are BRAINLESS atheist. And that's the only thing insulting to me.
When I talk to you, you should put your hands on the schoold desk, and keep your spine straight.
Understood?
Now get lost. You obviously have more time on your hands than me, loser.
>So on these matters, the West can and should work together with China
I have zero interest in your theories of how West should cooperate in China in fighting my brothers. Part of Islam is a belief that eventually, the rule of Shariah will be establish all over the world under a single righteous Khalifah, so all your "successes" are temporary, and all our victories are permanent. A Mujahid wins in both outcomes of the battle: whether he dies fighting or he wins fighting.
So shove your theories up your fat ass.
> it won't be a fundamentalist Muslim country. Because religious fundamentalism is inherently incompatible with technical progress
You are a moron.
>barbarians
Barbarians are those who remove taboos from their lives, like Westerners. The human being is defined not but what he does, but rather what he does not di, never, at no circumstances. You have a illogic notion that removal of taboos, which what your stinking liberal freedoms are, is a sign of "progress", "civilization", that stopping enforcing those taboos in society somehow makes you more "civilized", that automatic mercy to killers is a sign of "humanism"
I am not talking here about calling each other names. I know myself and I know Islam, I know my hard core fundamentalist Shariah supporting, head-chopping loving friends: doctors, programmers, taxi drivers, businesmen. My friend is a heart surgeon, quite famous right in the center of the Empire of Evil. He fully supports Shariah Hudd.
So, please stop being juvenile and lie to yourself about barbarism.
1400 years ago the Prophet, sal Allahu 'alaihi wa sallam said in his truly historic Last Sermon:
All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action.
Long after that your predecessors, Barbarians, invaded West Africa and sold the population of slaves to cowboys, your predecessors, in US, which until the end of 1960s were treated like shit in civilized country.
Long after that, your civilized brethren developed a concept of Nation-State.
Long after that you allowed a shitty small tribe of Jews with truly Barbarian cavemen ideology of nationalism dominate the politics of your "civilized" work.
So, please, with the sugar on the top, don't make laugh with your juvenile labels, dimwit.
>and because they do crazy things
cool story bro
>And I pay my taxes to ensure that the Free World has enough B-52s to keep it that way.
There was a time when US ans West weren't superpowers and there will be a time when they won't. In 5-10 years China's GDP will exceed US's.
So that's foundation of your religion of human rights, B-52?
What happens if someone had more B-52s and more importantly, larger balls, to challenge you? What will happen to your belief in your rights?
>my rights
"Your rights" are defined by a group of people. Another group of people disagree with your definition of your rights.
It's exactly because of what you mentioned that Christian government is a fail.
Historically, Jesus Christ did not create a single government, his pupils did after they rather liberally interpreted his teachings to the extent that many people call Christians Paulians.
>Didn't Taliban ban TVs at some point, and physically destroyed them wherever found?
That what I said actually: they might ban it, but they won't snoop
>Ethiopia is a majority Christian (Oriental Orthodox) country
It seems like only you know that. And that is why:
>Why would it want or need an Islamic government?
>If it ever gets one, it would be by conquest and subjugation by neighboring Muslim powers.
and Muslim population in Ethiopia. In shaa'a Allah, one day
Now go and find an article on Moron.
>it's inherently incompatible with a secular government
So you are implying that the government should be secular.
>but practical matters of government almost always leave religion in second place
Yes.
>Do you really think Muslim politicians are better than Christian politicians?
No, but Muslim religion is better than Christian. At least Islam has a coherent system of government rules built in.
There are more Muslims percentage wise acknowledging that their governmetns do not follow Shariah, than Americans acknowledging that US government does not follow constitution.
>It also says that killing an innocent person is a horrible sin
Wrong quote:
5:32
Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul
- it is as if he had slain mankind entirely.
All of those countries are ruled by deviants. Iran is ruled by Shiah polytheists. Saudi Arabia rulers only pretend the obey only Allah, the rest are just plain vanilla Western lackeys.
There are only two places that follow Sharia: al-Shabab controlled territory in Somalia and Taliban controlled territory in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Sincere Muslims follow Allah's laws not their own desires and materialistic interests. Truescotsman me all you want.
It does not matter who manufactured a hammer that made a whole, it's the one who is peeking through it that gets his eye gauged.
Now who will complain about evil carriers in US after you will get a perspective of what they do in Ethiopia? :-)
Jokes aside, Islam (Ethiopia has 3 times more Muslims than in 100% Muslim Somalia) prohibits prying and spying on civilians, so any snooping, any PATRIOT act, any FISA laws would be impossible under Islamic government.
They might prohibit certain services altogether to prevent spread of lewdness, but they won't spy on you.
Forgot to mention:
>blocking hosts file.
Updating it seems like full time job and I already have one. That's what ADP with lists is for.
>Why are you tolerating ad's on your phone?
It's already touchy/feely. Example: Contacts randomly does not save new contacts, added custom phones are not visible and usable.
Jailbreaking/rooting it cannot make it more stable.
Is there any evidence that your agricultural business needs to be at least of size X to receive government subsidies?
punishment
The only place I see ads is my mobile phone
The problem is that humans are now as far from nature as living tissue on the metal endoskeleton.
>Wrong again
When I was wrong the first time? Please remind
> Farm subsidies are intended to stabilize the food supply by giving farmers a less variable return on investment
Do they benefit the same way foreign farmers? No? Congratulation, you just explain in more details how local farmers are more supported.
Your argument is interesting and yet another reason of subsidies besides mine, and it is less universal, less important.
I am not smoking anything, but I also do not know anything about corn production. My comment was on general policy in agricultural subsidies. So please share your corn ideas here without any fear of my comments.