I have a common sense problem with it. Not a lot of people have problem with restricting access to pornography compared to number of people that will have a problem with restricting access to Islamic sites or Christian sites.
My view is that a right worth as much as how much people are going to fight for it.
I know people who sacrificing their life for Islam and do not know people sacrificing their life for pornography.
Bill demands service from ISP which could be chosen or rejected by users. Users will still have this wonderful opportunity to see humans degrade themselves on camera for money.
So, no, "UK Bill DOES NOT Demand Web Pornography Ban"
I agree everyone does it, but not everyone reaches that level of hypocrisy, where you stomp human rights in your own country, yet you are bombing another one for violating them
How about the whole attitude of the governments in developed countries "to prevent" crime?
It started with the recognition of the right of the shitty Middle Eastern state called "israel" to "preventive" strikes in the 70s, then the excuse to "prevent" something is used universally and pervasively through all spheres of government/private citizen interaction.
Stupid speed limits (55mph) on highways, stupid laws on school buses, stupid TSA, the hunt for any Muslim who dares to estalblish Shariah in his own land by hand.
If you, westerners, were worth a dime of your own beliefs you would fought tooth and nail to incorporate the following article in your man-made "constitutions":
- government cannot limit freedom of individuals under a pretext to prevent crime
There are plenty of scientists who are articulated and informed (even if he is informed, he did not yet let us get a chance to learn about it). The fact that they do not speak to general audience about their science, is because there is no need to do that. Nobody benefits from that. You need to do that in school, but it has very little sense to do it after 15.
Those scientists speak very articulately and in a very informed way among peers, that is people who need that.
So shut the heck up, you overmodded idiot.
He is just a sellout, who exchanged his education for a dubious profession of science popularizer.
Apparently, you have succeeded in bypassing censorship, because in none of two links mentioned in./ summary I have seen any indication on the religious identity of clashing groups.
The article (might be different one, cause I read it on reddit) mentions that methodology did not change since 2009, when the rate was 1 to 108 (or 180, i forgot).
The sequencing data produced is of inferior quality than 10 years ago. Somebody might be weeping with joy, but not the assemblers downstream in this data flow.
Ironically, previously quality did not matter much, when mapping genes was good enough. Nowadays when we are talking SNPs, reads are arguing with each other, MiSeq assemblies in disarray with Ion Torrent. Every sequence variation in alignment is screaming "I am Spartacus".
The problem of opened Pandora boxes is solved by opening hundred more of them. Which is good - slap NGS on your LinkedIn experience and you are set for at 150G.
You know what I do not like about it? It's that it seems oriented to convienience of the driver. If you ask me, drivers are already too comfortable with power-everything, so they start driving sloppily.
I would rather see those trains geared to high speed traffic with special lanes etc.
Right now it looks like those trains will be riding at the speed of the bus. We already having buses riding HOV lanes at the speed lower than everything else.
Slashdot Mirror
Show me the rules for writing in "BASIC-esque pseudocode"
>Have no problem with it?
I have a common sense problem with it. Not a lot of people have problem with restricting access to pornography compared to number of people that will have a problem with restricting access to Islamic sites or Christian sites.
My view is that a right worth as much as how much people are going to fight for it.
I know people who sacrificing their life for Islam and do not know people sacrificing their life for pornography.
Do YOU have a problem with that?
This "The Full Federal Court", what is it full of?
There is no BREAK in BASIC.
"It's one of the basic human instincts. "
You must be trolling
Bill demands service from ISP which could be chosen or rejected by users. Users will still have this wonderful opportunity to see humans degrade themselves on camera for money.
So, no, "UK Bill DOES NOT Demand Web Pornography Ban"
5000 artists? Anyone we know?
"Cable TV and the 5000 channels of shit "
compare to
"internet+netflix+hulu+amazon+whatever and 50000000 channels of shit"
5000 channels of shit is not a problem. Problem is 0 channels of non-shit.
And if you are cheap even for that, there is a "broadcasting" version of it: shady low quality streaming services.
I agree everyone does it, but not everyone reaches that level of hypocrisy, where you stomp human rights in your own country, yet you are bombing another one for violating them
How about the whole attitude of the governments in developed countries "to prevent" crime?
It started with the recognition of the right of the shitty Middle Eastern state called "israel" to "preventive" strikes in the 70s, then the excuse to "prevent" something is used universally and pervasively through all spheres of government/private citizen interaction.
Stupid speed limits (55mph) on highways, stupid laws on school buses, stupid TSA, the hunt for any Muslim who dares to estalblish Shariah in his own land by hand.
If you, westerners, were worth a dime of your own beliefs you would fought tooth and nail to incorporate the following article in your man-made "constitutions":
- government cannot limit freedom of individuals under a pretext to prevent crime
Actually from what I hear about Bill Nye is that his audience was primarily kids, which is fine by me.
I do not know Carl Sagan (I have heard of him, of course, but I do not know him).
Dawkins is a useless moron. He wrote Selfish Gene 40 years ago - dubious book of dubious quality and after that he did not do squat.
bq. An ignorant public is guaranteed to be hostile to funding pure research
That's why ignorant public should be kept at bay. Of course, it's not possible under "democracy".
> Not scientists.
There are plenty of scientists who are articulated and informed (even if he is informed, he did not yet let us get a chance to learn about it). The fact that they do not speak to general audience about their science, is because there is no need to do that. Nobody benefits from that. You need to do that in school, but it has very little sense to do it after 15.
Those scientists speak very articulately and in a very informed way among peers, that is people who need that.
So shut the heck up, you overmodded idiot.
He is just a sellout, who exchanged his education for a dubious profession of science popularizer.
And of course, some idiotic fanboy modded you down as "troll". I wish to meet that moron who modded you down face to face and polish his numbface.
deGrasse is an overblown mediocrity who ponders to scientifically ignorant but neverless enthusiastic audience.
I am tired of hearing about this guy. He is on reddit and on slashdot brought by legion of moronic fanboys.
All he says are generalities pondering to the crowd of scientific diletants and irrational atheists.
Apparently, you have succeeded in bypassing censorship, because in none of two links mentioned in ./ summary I have seen any indication on the religious identity of clashing groups.
Care to provide a link?
I love this phrase: "colonization of America"
>with "any" form of control
Here is your problem buddy. You pose absolute question, all or none. How about a grain of common sense?
That's the part that has been missing from Western democracy for ages, and you just noticed the attack on privacy?
Tiger Direct
New Egg
The article (might be different one, cause I read it on reddit) mentions that methodology did not change since 2009, when the rate was 1 to 108 (or 180, i forgot).
If you need GB/sec for downloading data, you are asking wrong questions. AWS can not only store but also compute.
BJI is producing so much data they are going back to shipping hard drives (flashback from 2000 for me)
The sequencing data produced is of inferior quality than 10 years ago. Somebody might be weeping with joy, but not the assemblers downstream in this data flow.
Ironically, previously quality did not matter much, when mapping genes was good enough. Nowadays when we are talking SNPs, reads are arguing with each other, MiSeq assemblies in disarray with Ion Torrent. Every sequence variation in alignment is screaming "I am Spartacus".
The problem of opened Pandora boxes is solved by opening hundred more of them. Which is good - slap NGS on your LinkedIn experience and you are set for at 150G.
You know what I do not like about it? It's that it seems oriented to convienience of the driver. If you ask me, drivers are already too comfortable with power-everything, so they start driving sloppily.
I would rather see those trains geared to high speed traffic with special lanes etc.
Right now it looks like those trains will be riding at the speed of the bus. We already having buses riding HOV lanes at the speed lower than everything else.
Thanks, hope somebody will mod you up