Here's a fucking suggestion: Don't use credit to pay bills.
Fuck, which cunts use their credit card to pay bills? Trust me, it's not a fraudulent charge taking 45 days to resolve that's fucking over your credit rating.
Yet again, you fail miserably to understand the fucking point.
I've put it simply, and you go "never ever happened". Well yes, the police did fucking publish a statement that means saying 'hi' to a girl in Nottingham qualifies as a hate crime.
No, they've never put out an equivalent statement regarding female comments towards men. Their statement explicitly mentioned the behaviour of men towards women, and only that.
So you'd best be reporting me to the Nottingham police because you're a cunt and I'm saying that no hatred at all only because you just aren't work the fucking energy.
Given that Nottingham police have removed the notice that had the evidence, you can either trust me or be a cunt.
I've highlighted where the Guardian article used their wording on 'unwanted verbal approach'. So basically yes, according to the exact fucking words posted on the police fucking website saying 'hi' to a woman when she doesn't want you to is now reportable as a hate crime.
So they're not irrelevant links, you do lack reading comprehension and I don't have to prove shit to you, I'm merely being generous in my attempts to educate you. Clearly you have no desire to learn.
I'm interested in this. I'd actually love to have a full RED digital video set up, I'm just short of the £120k it would cost to get all the bits I want.
That's not because they're over-priced, it's because they're bloody excellent. Although I'd probably have to add another £20k in training to use it all effectively..
Note 'unwanted verbal advances'. That was in the notice published on the Nottingham police website, which sadly they've since hidden from view: http://www.nottinghamshire.pol...
Of course, I've never harassed a woman in Nottingham, although I've been harassed by a man and assaulted by a woman. The police don't give a flying fuck about that though, no, it's just fucking misogyny is a hate crime and spending money on training police officers to be androphobic.
Enough references for you? If not, do your own fucking google searches.
You miss my point: It's fucking impossible to know what 'behave appropriately' means. The rules are oblique, impenetrable and constantly fucking changing.
So fuck you and your normative behavioural focus. Society doesn't have any fucking consistency, people are therefore going to get it wrong, and you can just fucking deal with it.
In short: Stop judging people for failing to obey your arbitrary changeable unpublished inconsistent rules.
In Nottingham, England, a man saying 'hi' to a woman can be reported for committing a hate crime. Unfortunately failing to say 'hi' to a woman can also be reported as a hate crime.
That's the fucking police telling people that. Just how much more fucking 'happened' do you want it?
. If you can't restrain yourself from behaving inappropriately in a given situation when it comes to respecting another person's bodily autonomy or commenting inappropriately on their appearance, the problem is YOU
Woman: Oh, I like your shoes. Woman 2: oh, thank you! Me: Oh, I like your shoes. Woman 2: Fuck off, creep!
So who's the sexist shit in this scenario? The problem isn't me, the problem is oblique sexist societal rules that make no fucking sense whatsoever and if you expect me to comply then the issue is with you and those fucked up rules and not me.
Woman assaulted -> by a man Child assaulted -> by a man Man assaulted -> by a man. That's 99% of cases.
Bullshit. That's nowhere near 99% of the cases, or even 99% of the reported cases.
Women are every bit as violent as men - e.g. rate of incidence of domestic violence is highest when both partners are female, and lowest when both partners are male.
I have heard of some women marrying themselves, but it isn't a real thing, just a sort of strange self affirmation. I wonder what the honeymoon would be like though.
I suspect a sex robot is involved. The sort that fits into a handbag.
There would be very little point in marrying say, a realdoll
Tax breaks. If you can get reduced tax because you're heterosexual then it's gender preference discrimination not to offer the same option to people that want to fuck robots.
If it looks underage it's illegal. So don't photograph your 25yo girlfriend in a schoolgirl uniform because that could get dodgy.
It also makes sales of these dolls a challenge even without any new laws: a photograph of a non-adult humanoid sex doll already transgresses child pornography laws in the UK, so any buyers have either already broken the law or they're buying sight unseen. Or in person, I guess.
Hell no. They should own at least two. One for personal use, one for professional use.
$50 every three years? Shit, wish I could get it that cheap. $100 for three years for one of mine, $50ish each for another two, and another $120/year for some other bugger to host them all.
Sure, some people can't afford that. Most people can, and while you may be happy with a gmail account I don't trust Google to keep providing those forever.
Oh, yeah, also, marriage is such a huge commitment compared having children.
Maybe they didn't share your fucked up belief in this archaic ritual called marriage.
Could be they couldn't afford to get married. Couldn't afford birth control either. Clearly couldn't fucking think properly and plan ahead, so why are you surprised by this?
If 22 million people decide that once they're no longer going to be fined for failing to insure themselves they'll take on the risk of being uninsured, I'm pretty fucking short on empathy if they subsequently find themselves lacking necessary health care.
But no, I wont kill myself. Nice show of empathy there from you.
First of all this fine is only ~1% of the EU budget so it's peanuts
Over 1.6% of the budget, but also higher than the average net contribution of all but four member states - one of whom is leaving in a couple of years, leaving the EU with a 15% shortfall in its cashflows.
A couple of fines this size each year will help plug that hole nicely.
No, you'd need to pay extra. They slice down the length of the penis and invert it to create the cavity as this allows nerve endings to provide sensations when penetrated. A really small penis would need supplementing to assure adequate depth.
Slashdot Mirror
Here's a fucking suggestion: Don't use credit to pay bills.
Fuck, which cunts use their credit card to pay bills? Trust me, it's not a fraudulent charge taking 45 days to resolve that's fucking over your credit rating.
Yet again, you fail miserably to understand the fucking point.
I've put it simply, and you go "never ever happened". Well yes, the police did fucking publish a statement that means saying 'hi' to a girl in Nottingham qualifies as a hate crime.
No, they've never put out an equivalent statement regarding female comments towards men. Their statement explicitly mentioned the behaviour of men towards women, and only that.
So you'd best be reporting me to the Nottingham police because you're a cunt and I'm saying that no hatred at all only because you just aren't work the fucking energy.
If I choose not to socially engage with a woman in Nottingham she can report that to the police as social exclusion and a hate crime.
I may be full of it, but trust me, nowhere near as fucking full of it as the local police.
Given that Nottingham police have removed the notice that had the evidence, you can either trust me or be a cunt.
I've highlighted where the Guardian article used their wording on 'unwanted verbal approach'. So basically yes, according to the exact fucking words posted on the police fucking website saying 'hi' to a woman when she doesn't want you to is now reportable as a hate crime.
So they're not irrelevant links, you do lack reading comprehension and I don't have to prove shit to you, I'm merely being generous in my attempts to educate you. Clearly you have no desire to learn.
I'm interested in this. I'd actually love to have a full RED digital video set up, I'm just short of the £120k it would cost to get all the bits I want.
That's not because they're over-priced, it's because they're bloody excellent. Although I'd probably have to add another £20k in training to use it all effectively..
Oh for fucks sake. Learn how to use fucking Google.
Lets start with a female friendly publication of alleged repute:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-e...
But lets go straight to a feminist national newspaper:
https://www.theguardian.com/li...
Note 'unwanted verbal advances'. That was in the notice published on the Nottingham police website, which sadly they've since hidden from view:
http://www.nottinghamshire.pol...
Of course, I've never harassed a woman in Nottingham, although I've been harassed by a man and assaulted by a woman. The police don't give a flying fuck about that though, no, it's just fucking misogyny is a hate crime and spending money on training police officers to be androphobic.
Enough references for you? If not, do your own fucking google searches.
You miss my point: It's fucking impossible to know what 'behave appropriately' means. The rules are oblique, impenetrable and constantly fucking changing.
So fuck you and your normative behavioural focus. Society doesn't have any fucking consistency, people are therefore going to get it wrong, and you can just fucking deal with it.
In short: Stop judging people for failing to obey your arbitrary changeable unpublished inconsistent rules.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blog...
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
I refuse to work for a manager that can't use Google, keep your fat fucking job.
I was interpreting it as being sarcastic.
Guess it qualifies as a troll either way..
In Nottingham, England, a man saying 'hi' to a woman can be reported for committing a hate crime.
Unfortunately failing to say 'hi' to a woman can also be reported as a hate crime.
That's the fucking police telling people that. Just how much more fucking 'happened' do you want it?
. If you can't restrain yourself from behaving inappropriately in a given situation when it comes to respecting another person's bodily autonomy or commenting inappropriately on their appearance, the problem is YOU
Woman: Oh, I like your shoes. Woman 2: oh, thank you!
Me: Oh, I like your shoes. Woman 2: Fuck off, creep!
So who's the sexist shit in this scenario? The problem isn't me, the problem is oblique sexist societal rules that make no fucking sense whatsoever and if you expect me to comply then the issue is with you and those fucked up rules and not me.
You're shitting me?
I've been accused of sexism for holding a door open for someone. You can't fucking imagine the response had I hated myself enough to ask her out.
Woman assaulted -> by a man Child assaulted -> by a man Man assaulted -> by a man. That's 99% of cases.
Bullshit. That's nowhere near 99% of the cases, or even 99% of the reported cases.
Women are every bit as violent as men - e.g. rate of incidence of domestic violence is highest when both partners are female, and lowest when both partners are male.
I have heard of some women marrying themselves, but it isn't a real thing, just a sort of strange self affirmation. I wonder what the honeymoon would be like though.
I suspect a sex robot is involved. The sort that fits into a handbag.
I used to dance with a lady that was around 140cm tall, and her friend that was a good 20cm shorter.
Both were late 20s, early 30s. The taller of the two was downright gorgeous too. But she fell for a guy that did WWII re-enactments so I moved on.
Legal to have sex with them? Oh yes. So no, a robot that looks like them should not be inherently illegal.
There would be very little point in marrying say, a realdoll
Tax breaks. If you can get reduced tax because you're heterosexual then it's gender preference discrimination not to offer the same option to people that want to fuck robots.
Who should asexual people marry?
The same way that it does with pictorial content.
If it looks underage it's illegal. So don't photograph your 25yo girlfriend in a schoolgirl uniform because that could get dodgy.
It also makes sales of these dolls a challenge even without any new laws: a photograph of a non-adult humanoid sex doll already transgresses child pornography laws in the UK, so any buyers have either already broken the law or they're buying sight unseen. Or in person, I guess.
Hell no. They should own at least two. One for personal use, one for professional use.
$50 every three years? Shit, wish I could get it that cheap. $100 for three years for one of mine, $50ish each for another two, and another $120/year for some other bugger to host them all.
Sure, some people can't afford that. Most people can, and while you may be happy with a gmail account I don't trust Google to keep providing those forever.
I support everybody's right to make a long term commitment to their partner of choice.
I don't support giving tax breaks or other benefits based on whether they've done that.
Where the fuck does gender or sexual preference come into it?
Oh, yeah, also, marriage is such a huge commitment compared having children .
Maybe they didn't share your fucked up belief in this archaic ritual called marriage.
Could be they couldn't afford to get married. Couldn't afford birth control either. Clearly couldn't fucking think properly and plan ahead, so why are you surprised by this?
If 22 million people decide that once they're no longer going to be fined for failing to insure themselves they'll take on the risk of being uninsured, I'm pretty fucking short on empathy if they subsequently find themselves lacking necessary health care.
But no, I wont kill myself. Nice show of empathy there from you.
For all your cynical IT news needs : https://www.theregister.co.uk/...
First of all this fine is only ~1% of the EU budget so it's peanuts
Over 1.6% of the budget, but also higher than the average net contribution of all but four member states - one of whom is leaving in a couple of years, leaving the EU with a 15% shortfall in its cashflows.
A couple of fines this size each year will help plug that hole nicely.
No, you'd need to pay extra. They slice down the length of the penis and invert it to create the cavity as this allows nerve endings to provide sensations when penetrated. A really small penis would need supplementing to assure adequate depth.
I'm not dismissing it as anything. I'm just highlighting that you're just fine and dandy with homicide but horrified by some fucking flirting.
I don't give a shit how inappropriate it was, I'm still going to class it as rather less of an imposition than killing someone.