Still - I guess he means it's still fucking happening, as it has for decades Too bad - Discriminating against men is bad. Where the fuck did he ask for women to be penalised more?? Basis - the fact that men are rarely the custodial parent is penalisation in itself, let alone the financial penalties, the difficulty enforcing visitation, the brainwashing vindictive vicious women do to their kids
You think that the fact that this supposed loophole is only questionably legal and not blindingly obviously legal and encouraged doesn't automatically mean the US legal system is fucked?
Thanks for pointing out Canada but you have serious issues to sort out a little nearer to home first.
Sure, try the UK. All road spending (including dirt track maintenance, urban roads and highways) is more than paid for by charges to users of motor vehicles. http://www.racfoundation.org/d...
Less mistaken and more irrelevant. Roads are paid for that way in modern Europe and other parts of the world too.
Try challenging existing working toll road systems (including the toll roads in the US for fucks sake) instead of trying to make pointless comparisons to medieval Europe.
Looks pretty fucking clear cut to me, and I've spent all of three minutes on the Internet.
Face it, this isn't a "fake scandal", this is either a malicious attempt to avoid oversight or a comical case of incompetence. I don't even care which, I'm just pointing out that you're full of shit.
Are you claiming that Clinton didn't have her own email server? That it wasn't hacked, thus exposing state secrets? That she didn't give copies of her official emails from her private email server to her lawyer?
Which of those facts is still under dispute, because at least two of them are clear violations of US law, and the other dependent only on an interpretation of criminal negligence.
If you're not a retard, you're doing no more harm than a doctor prescribing the same exact drug.
You've skipped the part where the doctor would determine first that antibiotics are the appropriate response.
Of course, I'm skipping the part where some doctors are retards handing out antibiotics like candy where it wont add any benefit except a small placebo effect and a large contribution to the doctor's profits.
A fine way to breed drug resistant bacteria, it's so lovely that you're sharing this excellent way of reducing global life expectancy and promoting a return to the medical outcomes so familiar at the start of the last century.
The motor insurance industry doesn't differentiate on why young men are a higher risk than any other group, but I think it's reasonable to suggest it isn't just correlation.
Although on this occasion, calling ignorant users assholes because they merely lack the understanding, experience or potentially wit to work effectively with computers does demonstrate a lack of empathy, the addition of which would indeed be a tremendous boon in a service based role.
So I wouldn't call this victim blaming, I'd suggest it's a fair and reasonable piece of constructive feedback. Some of those users may indeed be arseholes but that doesn't mean others get off the hook for it.
even a simple wedding photographer will charge $2k for a half day work and you don't even get a license to reprint
Half day? Shit. Last wedding I did, I was photographing from 9am to 11.30pm, post-processing took a sizeable chunk of the next day and I passed them the processed JPGs, the original JPGs, the original RAW files and a license that read, "It's your wedding, do what you like with the photos."
Maybe I should go into competition, clearly some wankers out there ripping off wedding parties.
Umm. I _want_ my compiler writers to cheat. Ok, I may not get the full benefits if I don't know all the cheats, but I'll trigger enough of them to make the system faster.
A compiler that knows how do make code execute faster? Sounds fucking ideal to me.
If this guy is innocent then he can work with them to show he is innocent. Let the Project see the evidence.
Ok, so lets lock you up. I'll draw up a list of crimes you may or may not have done and we'll keep you in prison until you've worked with the Innocent Project to prove your innocence on all of them.
Shouldn't take too long, I'll keep the list down to a couple of thousand different offences.
That said, if YOU were accused of having child porn I tend to think you would do everything in your power to show that wasn't the case. If you don't want child porn, think murder, rape or embezzlement.
That has nothing to do with whether I'm innocent though, and certainly nothing to do with whether it's appropriate to imprison me with no evidence.
Not in the UK. Here the police merely have to believe that a file is encrypted to demand the ability to access it.
If it's an unencrypted binary file format, random noise on the hard disk or evidence of a nuclear terror plot targeting the pope is completely irrelevant. Under the law you could be imprisoned for failing to decrypt your Linux swap file.
I'm not defending this. I wrote to my MP decrying the stupidity of the law when it was being proposed, but he's a fuckwit and the fascist Home Secretary was quite blase about being able to lock up innocent people with no evidence. Such is the sad state of the UK these days.
the end result of this is the same, a pervert sits behind bars
Fuck you and your evidence free condemnation of someone.
If he's committed a crime, prove it, provide the evidence, and a court will convict him and apply appropriate measures in response.
In the meantime an innocent person - pervert or otherwise - is in prison. Since you're also a pervert*, perhaps we should ask for you to be locked up indefinitely too?
*based on the simple refrain: I'm kinky, you're a pervert
Banning diesel cars is a farcical thing to do in a two year timescale. 5-10 years at best.
If my local city council ban diesel cars then I'll have to buy a different car to commute to work. I'll make sure it's a 20 year old petrol burner with horrific fuel economy and no catalytic converter. Maybe make one cylinder misfire too.
It's the cheapest way for me to acquire a second car. Far less wasteful and polluting to let me use the one I've already bought, but that wouldn't meet the demands of the fucking nazi council.
Just make the fence three foot wide and 18 feet tall using large blocks of granite. Remember to include a nice entrance way that has an arch under some holes in the floor of the room above.
Now the moat looks even cooler _and_ the neighbours wont be swimming in it.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh, go fuck yourself you idiotic cock.
"Quote me examples, except the ones that prove me wrong."
No. You're a cock. An idiotic one.
Still - I guess he means it's still fucking happening, as it has for decades
Too bad - Discriminating against men is bad. Where the fuck did he ask for women to be penalised more??
Basis - the fact that men are rarely the custodial parent is penalisation in itself, let alone the financial penalties, the difficulty enforcing visitation, the brainwashing vindictive vicious women do to their kids
Anything else?
You think that the fact that this supposed loophole is only questionably legal and not blindingly obviously legal and encouraged doesn't automatically mean the US legal system is fucked?
Thanks for pointing out Canada but you have serious issues to sort out a little nearer to home first.
I configure my own, I pay someone that does this multiple times a day to build it.
I know I can, but I can also do my own hoovering, weed my own garden and cut my own hair. That doesn't mean I have to.
Surely if you're renting a car to drive fast you'll get one that can actually go fast?
Shit, my second hand diesel will do 156mph and it's the electronic limiter stopping it going faster. And the tyres.
If I was paying $350 a day I'd want something that goes a fuck of a lot faster than 156.
I drive somewhere, it uses fuel, I pay tax on that fuel. It's a usage based fee.
I don't recall stating anywhere that I like it.
Fuck that. If you're quoting something, quote it properly.
Sure, try the UK. All road spending (including dirt track maintenance, urban roads and highways) is more than paid for by charges to users of motor vehicles.
http://www.racfoundation.org/d...
Over to you.
What the fuck does 'had to' have to do with it?
Shit, the kids these days..
If I'm not mistaken
Less mistaken and more irrelevant. Roads are paid for that way in modern Europe and other parts of the world too.
Try challenging existing working toll road systems (including the toll roads in the US for fucks sake) instead of trying to make pointless comparisons to medieval Europe.
Oh no, I challenge your bullshit and suddenly I'm frothing over some politician in another country? You're a complete cock.
You're also clearly fucking delusional. Check paragraph (f):
https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...
Looks pretty fucking clear cut to me, and I've spent all of three minutes on the Internet.
Face it, this isn't a "fake scandal", this is either a malicious attempt to avoid oversight or a comical case of incompetence. I don't even care which, I'm just pointing out that you're full of shit.
Let's see his taxes (ha! he won't release those without putting a lie to his $10B claim).
You have to declare assets on a US tax return? Odd.
Are you claiming that Clinton didn't have her own email server?
That it wasn't hacked, thus exposing state secrets?
That she didn't give copies of her official emails from her private email server to her lawyer?
Which of those facts is still under dispute, because at least two of them are clear violations of US law, and the other dependent only on an interpretation of criminal negligence.
If you're not a retard, you're doing no more harm than a doctor prescribing the same exact drug.
You've skipped the part where the doctor would determine first that antibiotics are the appropriate response.
Of course, I'm skipping the part where some doctors are retards handing out antibiotics like candy where it wont add any benefit except a small placebo effect and a large contribution to the doctor's profits.
A fine way to breed drug resistant bacteria, it's so lovely that you're sharing this excellent way of reducing global life expectancy and promoting a return to the medical outcomes so familiar at the start of the last century.
Who here hasn't gotten a blowjob while driving?
Most of the female Slashdot readers, for a start.
I also don't know anyone who crashed getting one.
The motor insurance industry doesn't differentiate on why young men are a higher risk than any other group, but I think it's reasonable to suggest it isn't just correlation.
Although on this occasion, calling ignorant users assholes because they merely lack the understanding, experience or potentially wit to work effectively with computers does demonstrate a lack of empathy, the addition of which would indeed be a tremendous boon in a service based role.
So I wouldn't call this victim blaming, I'd suggest it's a fair and reasonable piece of constructive feedback. Some of those users may indeed be arseholes but that doesn't mean others get off the hook for it.
Sometimes the highlight-click-search-google option is just too easy for sanity (or to avoid inadvertent cause for being arrested).
On this occasion, "... pump(1); chess(1); douglas adams(1); robosexuality(1); wife(1); suppository(1); submissive(1); fossil fuel(1); straight sex(1); masturbation(1); doll(1); date(1)."
Now there's a complicated set of tags on a web page's content.
even a simple wedding photographer will charge $2k for a half day work and you don't even get a license to reprint
Half day? Shit. Last wedding I did, I was photographing from 9am to 11.30pm, post-processing took a sizeable chunk of the next day and I passed them the processed JPGs, the original JPGs, the original RAW files and a license that read, "It's your wedding, do what you like with the photos."
Maybe I should go into competition, clearly some wankers out there ripping off wedding parties.
Umm. I _want_ my compiler writers to cheat. Ok, I may not get the full benefits if I don't know all the cheats, but I'll trigger enough of them to make the system faster.
A compiler that knows how do make code execute faster? Sounds fucking ideal to me.
If this guy is innocent then he can work with them to show he is innocent. Let the Project see the evidence.
Ok, so lets lock you up. I'll draw up a list of crimes you may or may not have done and we'll keep you in prison until you've worked with the Innocent Project to prove your innocence on all of them.
Shouldn't take too long, I'll keep the list down to a couple of thousand different offences.
That said, if YOU were accused of having child porn I tend to think you would do everything in your power to show that wasn't the case. If you don't want child porn, think murder, rape or embezzlement.
That has nothing to do with whether I'm innocent though, and certainly nothing to do with whether it's appropriate to imprison me with no evidence.
Not in the UK. Here the police merely have to believe that a file is encrypted to demand the ability to access it.
If it's an unencrypted binary file format, random noise on the hard disk or evidence of a nuclear terror plot targeting the pope is completely irrelevant. Under the law you could be imprisoned for failing to decrypt your Linux swap file.
I'm not defending this. I wrote to my MP decrying the stupidity of the law when it was being proposed, but he's a fuckwit and the fascist Home Secretary was quite blase about being able to lock up innocent people with no evidence. Such is the sad state of the UK these days.
the end result of this is the same, a pervert sits behind bars
Fuck you and your evidence free condemnation of someone.
If he's committed a crime, prove it, provide the evidence, and a court will convict him and apply appropriate measures in response.
In the meantime an innocent person - pervert or otherwise - is in prison. Since you're also a pervert*, perhaps we should ask for you to be locked up indefinitely too?
*based on the simple refrain: I'm kinky, you're a pervert
Banning diesel cars is a farcical thing to do in a two year timescale. 5-10 years at best.
If my local city council ban diesel cars then I'll have to buy a different car to commute to work. I'll make sure it's a 20 year old petrol burner with horrific fuel economy and no catalytic converter. Maybe make one cylinder misfire too.
It's the cheapest way for me to acquire a second car. Far less wasteful and polluting to let me use the one I've already bought, but that wouldn't meet the demands of the fucking nazi council.
Just make the fence three foot wide and 18 feet tall using large blocks of granite. Remember to include a nice entrance way that has an arch under some holes in the floor of the room above.
Now the moat looks even cooler _and_ the neighbours wont be swimming in it.