Classical Music doesn't get rid of the riff-raff, it is a statement of saying that we do not want kids here, or we prefer that particular type of ambiance.
The kid who is going to cause trouble isn't going to be stopped or is dissuaded by the music
The kid that's going to cause trouble is there because the other kids are there. If the other kids don't like the music then they wouldn't be there, and the kid that would cause the trouble will fuck off to wherever they went instead and cause trouble there instead.
There are multiple 'good news' stories relating to the work Trump is doing. That you can't reference any of them horrifically demonstrates the partisan echo chamber you occupy.
Maybe you should seek a broader set of news sources that can offer you a more balanced view. You'll still hate Trump, but at least you'll be able to do it from an informed position.
Let alone a "lower". Sure, it speeds shit up, but really, designing and building an automatic firearm isn't hard. A programmable cnc machine just speeds up how quickly you can make them.
The only reason I haven't made one is that UK law isn't terribly amenable to firearm manufacture
Your response reeks of, "Your response destroys my argument so I'm going to change the terms to exclude everything you've said."
If I press a button and lots of bullets sequentially head towards the enemy I have an automatic weapon. I don't give a fuck how that automatic mechanism is implemented, I care that it works and that my target gets lead poisoning.
Shit, you'll be telling me next that the a10 doesn't have an automatic weapon attached. Sure as fuck don't see the pilot leaning down out of the cockpit to pull a trigger 2000 times a second.
I don't however view it as slavery. People get paid and expecting people to contribute to their society does not equate to enslaving them.
Given that military missions are primarily humanitarian in nature I'm also entirely comfortable that a standing army is not a corporate tool, and does not exist to invade other countries for economic gain.
I also recognise that economic security is something people expect their government to provide.
But hey, continue to spout shit about things you're proud to have never had to learn..
Drones can't search property, telepresence is fuck all use at a roadblock, food delivery that can be easily hacked, stolen, diverted or otherwise interrupted isn't food delivery at all and then you finally acknowledge that we need soldiers.
Surprise surprise. But.. what are your real reasons for not wanting conscription, given the ones you provided are utter bollocks?
Interesting that you describe that person as a gamer, rather than a failed business man, an owner of expensive sports cars, a mental illness sufferer or indeed any of the other identities that would apply.
Pushing an agenda much? Just that 80% of the population qualify as 'gamer', it's not a terribly useful distinction when determining why someone might, e.g., kill themselves.
Wait, hang on. Why are we discussing cake? Oh. Was that meant to be an insult?
Should have guessed you didn't know what you were talking about when you tried suggesting video games are all about shooting people up. It's not as though the tournament was entirely based around a computer game that doesn't have any guns in it.
Yeah. We'd all have laughed if the Twitch stream had shown a football bouncing off the chest of one of the competitors, cut to the crowd, some skinny shit from Baltimore holding another ball screaming, "Take that, you superior Madden player!"
As a Brit that still lives here I'm fucking proud that my country stood alone in the world against Nazi Germany and bankrupted an empire in order to meet its promises.
I'm also proud that we helped the members of that empire transition to self rule, and continue to support them to this day.
I look at the pussy liberal culture in the UK that was emerging even then and see how it has now driven the entire country into the ground
You appear to be blind. I hope someone keeps paying your health insurance premiums for you.
Are they also mostly sexually abused? Just that.. most rapists were.
It's almost as though people that step substantially away from the norm have complex issues for which they haven't received appropriate support or something.
Or maybe fewer people that think prayers are the answer. Stop relying on your made up invisible pink unicorn and start living in the real world.
You're as bad as the fuckwit councilman for the area.
âoeMy solution is we really need to talk about God. Iâ(TM)m asking the faith-based community to step up, Gaffney said.
What, the god that supports the murder of people for daring to be homosexual? The god that supports the murder of people for daring to worship a different god?
I'll take the 'more guns' option thanks, at least they're honest.
Then you can repeal the second amendment, as an untrained militia is going to be categorically worse than a trained one, and you're suggesting a trained one is worthless.
But tell me, how do drones search properties, man roadblocks, deliver food, build relationships? The average soldier spends around 0.003% of their military time in combat.
I'm fairly sure that adding more guns to that situation would only have raised the body count.
For one thing at least three gun carriers would've shot at each other and not the original assailant. Then there's the additional casualties when they missed. And given that one of the dead was probably killed with the first shot, and one was killed with the last, there's basically a maximum of one death that even could have been prevented.
No, probably for the best that there wasn't a firefight.
A few of us use IMDB as a personal record of the films we've seen by adding reviews, and use the IMDB score as an indicator of whether a film is 'watch while eating dinner' or 'turn down the lights and give it full attention'.
Rotten Tomatoes is some weird irrelevance that people in America curiously care about. Or maybe it's just American media.
Oh for fucks sake. Playing a computer game is not a fucking red fucking flag. Stop being a paranoid fucking idiot.
Playing a computer game does not disrespect the school. Playing a computer game does not make it harder for teachers to protect students.
Going on inane fucking witchhunts about computer games makes it harder to protect students, by wasting everybody's time and teaching kids that they're not respected and shouldn't expect justice from the system.
Finally, while on school property, a student is expected to adhere to a more rigorous standard of behavior suitable to that of the workplace
The places I work, people play computer games on the work computers. The companies provide gaming equipment in break rooms. People play games on their phones and their tablets when they're on a break.
Seems to me playing computer games is behaviour suitable in the workplace. Seems to me it's behaviour suitable at school too. Shit, I played computer games at school. Held the school's Chuckie Egg record; probably still do.
It would not be appropriate to go around an office building playing an augmented reality shooter
Bullshit.
Hell, my former boss in Texas used to have a rifle in his office. Multiple colleagues had firearms in their cars. And you're worried about a fucking computer game?
It violates the boundary of respect for a policy of no guns on school property.
He took how many guns on to school property? Count them for me. Shit, double it.
Nope, still not seeing any.
The virtual aspect of the weapons should not allow them to be exempt from school guidelines or policy.
The hysterical fear of a mobile telephone would destroy any respect for such a policy. There were no weapons and that means no exemption is required.
This "virtually" violates the school policy and code of conduct. The Zombies are immaterial.
The weapons are immaterial as well. I can virtually murder you, rape your daughter, shit on your family dog and drop you an email containing a photograph of me laughing as I do it. I still haven't violated school fucking policy.
If non-existant weapons are treated with such fear and distress the kids are totally fucked if they ever encounter real ones.
Schools have a legal no-tolerance zone 1000 feet around them for various things, this is found to be Constitutional. From that, posting a video of violating that boundary is considered evidence of a potential crime.
No tolerance to what? Playing computer games? Having a fucking brain?
Slashdot Mirror
Classical Music doesn't get rid of the riff-raff, it is a statement of saying that we do not want kids here, or we prefer that particular type of ambiance.
The kid who is going to cause trouble isn't going to be stopped or is dissuaded by the music
The kid that's going to cause trouble is there because the other kids are there. If the other kids don't like the music then they wouldn't be there, and the kid that would cause the trouble will fuck off to wherever they went instead and cause trouble there instead.
Thus the riff-raff have been deterred.
Well done on kind of proving his point.
There are multiple 'good news' stories relating to the work Trump is doing. That you can't reference any of them horrifically demonstrates the partisan echo chamber you occupy.
Maybe you should seek a broader set of news sources that can offer you a more balanced view. You'll still hate Trump, but at least you'll be able to do it from an informed position.
Let alone a "lower". Sure, it speeds shit up, but really, designing and building an automatic firearm isn't hard. A programmable cnc machine just speeds up how quickly you can make them.
The only reason I haven't made one is that UK law isn't terribly amenable to firearm manufacture
Your response reeks of, "Your response destroys my argument so I'm going to change the terms to exclude everything you've said."
If I press a button and lots of bullets sequentially head towards the enemy I have an automatic weapon. I don't give a fuck how that automatic mechanism is implemented, I care that it works and that my target gets lead poisoning.
Shit, you'll be telling me next that the a10 doesn't have an automatic weapon attached. Sure as fuck don't see the pilot leaning down out of the cockpit to pull a trigger 2000 times a second.
Well now, who said I support conscription?
I don't however view it as slavery. People get paid and expecting people to contribute to their society does not equate to enslaving them.
Given that military missions are primarily humanitarian in nature I'm also entirely comfortable that a standing army is not a corporate tool, and does not exist to invade other countries for economic gain.
I also recognise that economic security is something people expect their government to provide.
But hey, continue to spout shit about things you're proud to have never had to learn..
You appear to have no military experience at all.
Drones can't search property, telepresence is fuck all use at a roadblock, food delivery that can be easily hacked, stolen, diverted or otherwise interrupted isn't food delivery at all and then you finally acknowledge that we need soldiers.
Surprise surprise. But.. what are your real reasons for not wanting conscription, given the ones you provided are utter bollocks?
Hmm. No.
Interesting that you describe that person as a gamer, rather than a failed business man, an owner of expensive sports cars, a mental illness sufferer or indeed any of the other identities that would apply.
Pushing an agenda much? Just that 80% of the population qualify as 'gamer', it's not a terribly useful distinction when determining why someone might, e.g., kill themselves.
Cupcakes are tasty. I like fairy cakes myself.
Wait, hang on. Why are we discussing cake? Oh. Was that meant to be an insult?
Should have guessed you didn't know what you were talking about when you tried suggesting video games are all about shooting people up. It's not as though the tournament was entirely based around a computer game that doesn't have any guns in it.
Yeah. We'd all have laughed if the Twitch stream had shown a football bouncing off the chest of one of the competitors, cut to the crowd, some skinny shit from Baltimore holding another ball screaming, "Take that, you superior Madden player!"
Not every mass shooting is done by someone that owns guns.
Stop trying to demonise a whole class of people because of the actions of a few fuckwits that don't all even belong in that class.
Nobody commits a mass shooting with a baseball bat, or automobile, or any fucking other thing besides a gun.
Nobody commits a mass vehicle ramming attack with a gun. By your logic all automobile owners should be demonised for trying to run over pedestrians.
As a Brit that still lives here I'm fucking proud that my country stood alone in the world against Nazi Germany and bankrupted an empire in order to meet its promises.
I'm also proud that we helped the members of that empire transition to self rule, and continue to support them to this day.
I look at the pussy liberal culture in the UK that was emerging even then and see how it has now driven the entire country into the ground
You appear to be blind. I hope someone keeps paying your health insurance premiums for you.
Are they also mostly sexually abused? Just that.. most rapists were.
It's almost as though people that step substantially away from the norm have complex issues for which they haven't received appropriate support or something.
Or maybe fewer people that think prayers are the answer. Stop relying on your made up invisible pink unicorn and start living in the real world.
You're as bad as the fuckwit councilman for the area.
âoeMy solution is we really need to talk about God. Iâ(TM)m asking the faith-based community to step up, Gaffney said.
What, the god that supports the murder of people for daring to be homosexual? The god that supports the murder of people for daring to worship a different god?
I'll take the 'more guns' option thanks, at least they're honest.
There seems to be a problem with your knowledge of geography. Unless Baltimore is now in Florida and nobody told me?
Do you think there will be fewer robberies or murders? How well does it work out for countries like Great Britain?
Well, we have less crime than the US. But we did before we implemented the current restrictions on firearms, so it's not really a useful comparison.
Then you can repeal the second amendment, as an untrained militia is going to be categorically worse than a trained one, and you're suggesting a trained one is worthless.
But tell me, how do drones search properties, man roadblocks, deliver food, build relationships? The average soldier spends around 0.003% of their military time in combat.
I'm fairly sure that adding more guns to that situation would only have raised the body count.
For one thing at least three gun carriers would've shot at each other and not the original assailant. Then there's the additional casualties when they missed. And given that one of the dead was probably killed with the first shot, and one was killed with the last, there's basically a maximum of one death that even could have been prevented.
No, probably for the best that there wasn't a firefight.
Yeah, it's never been relevant to anybody I know.
A few of us use IMDB as a personal record of the films we've seen by adding reviews, and use the IMDB score as an indicator of whether a film is 'watch while eating dinner' or 'turn down the lights and give it full attention'.
Rotten Tomatoes is some weird irrelevance that people in America curiously care about. Or maybe it's just American media.
Oh for fucks sake. Playing a computer game is not a fucking red fucking flag. Stop being a paranoid fucking idiot.
Playing a computer game does not disrespect the school. Playing a computer game does not make it harder for teachers to protect students.
Going on inane fucking witchhunts about computer games makes it harder to protect students, by wasting everybody's time and teaching kids that they're not respected and shouldn't expect justice from the system.
Finally, while on school property, a student is expected to adhere to a more rigorous standard of behavior suitable to that of the workplace
The places I work, people play computer games on the work computers. The companies provide gaming equipment in break rooms. People play games on their phones and their tablets when they're on a break.
Seems to me playing computer games is behaviour suitable in the workplace. Seems to me it's behaviour suitable at school too. Shit, I played computer games at school. Held the school's Chuckie Egg record; probably still do.
It would not be appropriate to go around an office building playing an augmented reality shooter
Bullshit.
Hell, my former boss in Texas used to have a rifle in his office. Multiple colleagues had firearms in their cars. And you're worried about a fucking computer game?
Grow the fuck up.
Lets not alienate people that seek escapist entertainment for reasons that may include societal rejection.
Lets certainly not ruin their future and give them a genuine grievance against 'normal' people.
Certain things should be held with respect and dignity.
So why are you seeking to remove this kid's dignity by refusing to respect his choice of entertainment?
It violates the boundary of respect for a policy of no guns on school property.
He took how many guns on to school property? Count them for me. Shit, double it.
Nope, still not seeing any.
The virtual aspect of the weapons should not allow them to be exempt from school guidelines or policy.
The hysterical fear of a mobile telephone would destroy any respect for such a policy. There were no weapons and that means no exemption is required.
This "virtually" violates the school policy and code of conduct. The Zombies are immaterial.
The weapons are immaterial as well. I can virtually murder you, rape your daughter, shit on your family dog and drop you an email containing a photograph of me laughing as I do it. I still haven't violated school fucking policy.
If non-existant weapons are treated with such fear and distress the kids are totally fucked if they ever encounter real ones.
The article suggests some business owners do not want that advertising expense.
My point is that there is a real cost, contrary to the claims by the person to whom I replied.
Schools have a legal no-tolerance zone 1000 feet around them for various things, this is found to be Constitutional. From that, posting a video of violating that boundary is considered evidence of a potential crime.
No tolerance to what? Playing computer games? Having a fucking brain?
His video violates what fucking boundary exactly?
Ten points on every bet, win or lose.
Who the fuck pays a bookie to take a bet?
You place the bet, if you win you get your money back. You sure as fuck don't pay for the privilege of risking your money.
Which fucked up bookies do you frequent?