What he is describing does not sound like a super car. Yes it has advantages but it is not going to produce anything 'super', getting enough energy from a battery to propel a car down the quater mile in a 'super' time is not gonna happen. Getting enough power from a battery to do 'super' sustained high speed runs is not gonna happen. Thousands of years of human existance would suggest cars in general are overkill for daily life. Being quiet vs being loud and noisey is subjective, some people like noisey and loud. EV are not good at speed, perhaps your version of 'speed' and my version of 'speed' are different. You also failed to address any of what I put forward such as the widely available fuels, the fact that there are road driven sub 7 second cars and that all documented races by Tesla are poor... I don't consider any thing running double digits in quarter mile fast. Methanol is a naturally occuring substance that can be made from waste products so it is green as well. So like I said at the very start electric cars... yawn.
Tesla roadster runs ~12.7 quarter... don't mistake poor engineering and production of an axle as evidence of performance. Cheap as Subaru STI beats Tesla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDFmbZorx_g&feature=related
I think the Italians are pretty safe.
Nitromethane? There are a variety of fuels out there that can be bought in bulk for cars in the seven second bracket... VPImport, Methanol, add good squirt of NOS. How about we switch the argument to range then, how many LeMans cars are running for 24 hours on batteries? Plus the summary (you did read the summary right?) said "electric-powered supercars" how many Lambos, Ferraris, Bugatti do you see being driven to work? How many for grocery shopping? Tesla roadster runs 12.7 quarter... so Subaru WRX times... wow!
Street car running sub 7 seconds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwF-kr91uxUhttp://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/22/videos-worlds-fastest-street-car-drives-1-200-miles-whips-off/
Show me a car sporting these engines you talk of on a track and I'll take back my statement. Hell on a drag strip 400m and sub 7 seconds is all your fancy electric car has to do... no takers? No proof? Didn't think so. All those heavy batteries ruin power to weight.
And what is wrong with the Australian government representing the best interest of its people and not the interest of corp America? Why when Australia was negotiating the Malaysia solution for immigrants was the US putting pressure on Malaysia to tie any deal to plain packaging of cigarette to suit american tobacco interests? As an Australian I say bugger off to America trying to pervert my country and is purchasing interests for its own selfish / corporate reasons. What about America putting the pressure on New Zealand over Kim Dot Com - a raid that turned out illegal? Your rant completely fails to address my point, that it is entirely possible and probably that in many deals with China FUD is introduced by the US to suit its own interests, or Australia is pressured to create FUD to keep the US happy. What the f*ck are you talking about treasury bonds for? Or China investment? Or F15? It's bad enough our boys are being blown up in US wars (Still looking for the WMD, what was that even about? Oh yeah Oil) But to have the US and US coporate interests playing shenanigans for stock holders is a piss poor effort.
The way this works is:
1. Cisco lobby US gov.
2. US gov put pressure on Aus gov.
3. Aus gov create FUD about cisco rival.
4. Aus gov buy cisco.
5. Profit - cisco and US senators.
1. Create video that is insulting to muslims and islam.
2. Put this dudes name in the credits and his business address etc.
3. Profit?
Crowdsourcing take down. You're welcome.
"is probably going to be enough to make me switch to an inferior carrier once my current plan ends." --- ha! Telstra is an inferior carrier, you really should be supporting iiNet. They are looking after their users rights, something Telstra has never done.
Or 15 year olds that are sexting... seriously that is the state of play now. You can be put on a sex offenders list for taking photos of yourself. Under these circumstances please explain who the victim is, the person knowingly taking photos of themselves and distributing them? Or the recent issue in Australia of a well know artist that painted children naked but without their bits showing and all the crazies came out the woodwork completely glossing over the difference between art and porn or even nudity and porn. Or how about Japan and their comics? I bet if real doll (TM) brought out a 12 year old model all the same arguments would be made including "think of the victims" despite there being no victims. Crazies gonna craze!
All that is needed is malware that randomly flags sites. The amount of submissions would create so much noise the system would be unable to serve its purpose. Game over.
So what your saying is the customer failed to roll out changes to a test environment before releasing to production and got burned. For mission critical systems no less, sound like someone needs to be fired, maybe even a whole team. It wasn't your bug and so your entitled to bill for fixing it, so in answer to the slashdot question - yes bill them for bugs.
A lot of what your saying is BS. But lets focus on one specific.
This is reflected in the bell curves - women have less variation than men. This is why more boys are born than girls - more boys die because they tend to take chances growing up.
Birth rates are generally pretty close with less than a.1% variance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio
As for taking chances growing up meaning more boys die... citation please (i expect you have none as collecting data on this would be impossible). What about gender specific diseases such as breat cancer altering that ratio? What about the impact of certain mental illnesses being different between the sexes? Perhaps men have a higher rate of birth (again less than.1%) because they are more likely to be affected by X chromosome health issues and a higher birth rate is a built redundancy.
What biological expense of child birth? Women live longer than men. If women incur a 'biological expense' death rates certainly don't support your argument.
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1827162,00.html
Please provide data confirming that women are risk adverse more so than men. Your bell curve argument is hack science and you argument(s) over all are weak. Your 'business requires the ability to take risk and so men are better at it' is long bow to draw as well. Australians richest woman (and one of the richest people in the world) is a woman, same for the PM, same for an ex New Zealand PM and the list goes on.
"We could not participate in the government’s Women-Owned Small Business program unless there was another female competitor,” -- you can still compete for tenders though, you know as one innovative company against a group of other innovative companies. What is really the issue is you don't want to compete against others... just a small subset. What is really the problem here is that the 'protection racket' only kicks in when there are two or more companies eligible for protection. What ever happend to ROI, competition and most suitable candidate? All this says indirectly is "If you can't beat the boys don't worry dear, we'll make a special playgroud just for you and your girlfriends, no matter how less capable you are. So much for "women doin it for themselves"
How about fireworks. Are fireworks at a wedding acceptable to you? Because you can bet if they started launching fireworks they get nailed as well. It is socially acceptable to fire guns in celebration in MANY countries, hell ANZAC day in Australia they fire guns, cannons, artillery all kinds of shit, they do it in the US as well, have you ever attended a military parade or funeral. Oh... what you mean is they should not fire guns in celebration while there is an occupying force in their country. Nice one. I wonder how many of those guns are relics supplied by the US to help fight the soviets. You're a dick.
"Few koalas live outside Australia, but the U.S. government designated the animal as endangered in response to a petition filed by animal-protection groups. The Australian government, which bans hunting and commercial use of koalas, sees no scientific evidence that it is likely to become endangered anytime soon."
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/05/0510_020510_TVkoala.html
So basically the US who have no idea what is going on in Australia BOW DOWN TO SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS and list it as endangered. Meanwhile in Australia in certain areas Koalas are so prolific they are hurting their environment. As for the rain forrest MASSIVE amounts of Australian rainforest is protected. I can only guess what the BS in PBS stands for.
You're a dick. If you really want to get pissed about something try the Japanese hunting wales for 'Research Purposes'... or better yet fix your own country first.
I tend to agree. If the USA wasn't running wars with no clear finish line to support military industrial complex lobbyists and interest groups you would have trillions of dollars to spend on health, education, infrastructure etc. Seriously how do you guys do it? Even if you spent those trillions on subsidies to get manufacturing back into your country you would be better off than waging a single war (let alone at least three - drugs, iraq, afganistan), you'd have a stimulated economy and jobs. Instead your letting China buy your bonds so you can expose yourself to even higher debt levels... the very country that we continually get told is hacking you guys left right and center. The very country that has all the ex-USA jobs shipped overseas, while those with jobs piss into the wind to bail out gready wall street execs and coprorations with more rights than the people and cash to nullify the law. At the same time you ship your youth off to be killed and injured by people on the other side of the world who will continue to do so because of religious belief. It's not a war to them, it is a way of life, fighting them just fuels their hatred. In return you generate more agression towards your country which only then serves to provide an excuse for your civil and human rights to be taken away right in front of your faces and your children molested and radiated at airports. You guys truely deserve the title 'Planet America' because you are so far down the WTF hole the rest of the world is stunned and views you in some kind of alternate reality. I don't know if Ron Paul can fix this but you have to do something massive and out of the box or you guys are screwed. I'm not hating on Americans but seriously the rest of the world has a front row seat to a film called 'How to implode an empire'.
It is not happening in the US so why draw that comparison? Contrary to what the US believes US law doesn't apply everywhere. If it did the US couldn't create legal black holes such as Guantanamo when it suits their needs. Oh and how can one 'intrude' on a global, multi jurisdiction public network? And all proxies are masquerading on behalf of other peers. Fake information is illegal? Facebook and Google might want you to think so but.... in a word... No.
Slashdot Mirror
Or attacked the USA knowingly http://www.businessinsider.com/45-years-ago-this-week-israel-attacked-a-us-navy-ship-and-killed-dozens-of-sailors--survivors-want-to-know-why-2012-6
What he is describing does not sound like a super car. Yes it has advantages but it is not going to produce anything 'super', getting enough energy from a battery to propel a car down the quater mile in a 'super' time is not gonna happen. Getting enough power from a battery to do 'super' sustained high speed runs is not gonna happen. Thousands of years of human existance would suggest cars in general are overkill for daily life. Being quiet vs being loud and noisey is subjective, some people like noisey and loud. EV are not good at speed, perhaps your version of 'speed' and my version of 'speed' are different. You also failed to address any of what I put forward such as the widely available fuels, the fact that there are road driven sub 7 second cars and that all documented races by Tesla are poor... I don't consider any thing running double digits in quarter mile fast. Methanol is a naturally occuring substance that can be made from waste products so it is green as well. So like I said at the very start electric cars... yawn.
Tesla roadster runs ~12.7 quarter... don't mistake poor engineering and production of an axle as evidence of performance. Cheap as Subaru STI beats Tesla http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDFmbZorx_g&feature=related I think the Italians are pretty safe.
Nitromethane? There are a variety of fuels out there that can be bought in bulk for cars in the seven second bracket... VPImport, Methanol, add good squirt of NOS. How about we switch the argument to range then, how many LeMans cars are running for 24 hours on batteries? Plus the summary (you did read the summary right?) said "electric-powered supercars" how many Lambos, Ferraris, Bugatti do you see being driven to work? How many for grocery shopping? Tesla roadster runs 12.7 quarter... so Subaru WRX times... wow! Street car running sub 7 seconds: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lwF-kr91uxU http://www.autoblog.com/2010/09/22/videos-worlds-fastest-street-car-drives-1-200-miles-whips-off/
So can sex... but it will never be as good as the real thing. Some new BMW's do this and it is terrible.
Show me a car sporting these engines you talk of on a track and I'll take back my statement. Hell on a drag strip 400m and sub 7 seconds is all your fancy electric car has to do... no takers? No proof? Didn't think so. All those heavy batteries ruin power to weight.
Call me when electric cars are making the same power and torque as an 8/71 or 16/71 big block then I'll get excited. Electric super cars? Pfft.
And what is wrong with the Australian government representing the best interest of its people and not the interest of corp America? Why when Australia was negotiating the Malaysia solution for immigrants was the US putting pressure on Malaysia to tie any deal to plain packaging of cigarette to suit american tobacco interests? As an Australian I say bugger off to America trying to pervert my country and is purchasing interests for its own selfish / corporate reasons. What about America putting the pressure on New Zealand over Kim Dot Com - a raid that turned out illegal? Your rant completely fails to address my point, that it is entirely possible and probably that in many deals with China FUD is introduced by the US to suit its own interests, or Australia is pressured to create FUD to keep the US happy. What the f*ck are you talking about treasury bonds for? Or China investment? Or F15? It's bad enough our boys are being blown up in US wars (Still looking for the WMD, what was that even about? Oh yeah Oil) But to have the US and US coporate interests playing shenanigans for stock holders is a piss poor effort.
The way this works is: 1. Cisco lobby US gov. 2. US gov put pressure on Aus gov. 3. Aus gov create FUD about cisco rival. 4. Aus gov buy cisco. 5. Profit - cisco and US senators.
1. Create video that is insulting to muslims and islam. 2. Put this dudes name in the credits and his business address etc. 3. Profit? Crowdsourcing take down. You're welcome.
"is probably going to be enough to make me switch to an inferior carrier once my current plan ends." --- ha! Telstra is an inferior carrier, you really should be supporting iiNet. They are looking after their users rights, something Telstra has never done.
Or 15 year olds that are sexting... seriously that is the state of play now. You can be put on a sex offenders list for taking photos of yourself. Under these circumstances please explain who the victim is, the person knowingly taking photos of themselves and distributing them? Or the recent issue in Australia of a well know artist that painted children naked but without their bits showing and all the crazies came out the woodwork completely glossing over the difference between art and porn or even nudity and porn. Or how about Japan and their comics? I bet if real doll (TM) brought out a 12 year old model all the same arguments would be made including "think of the victims" despite there being no victims. Crazies gonna craze!
What about anabolic substances? No impairment, hell probably able to stack those boxes faster.
All that is needed is malware that randomly flags sites. The amount of submissions would create so much noise the system would be unable to serve its purpose. Game over.
So what your saying is the customer failed to roll out changes to a test environment before releasing to production and got burned. For mission critical systems no less, sound like someone needs to be fired, maybe even a whole team. It wasn't your bug and so your entitled to bill for fixing it, so in answer to the slashdot question - yes bill them for bugs.
Tell me what it is you do for a living?
Pshycologist
Yeah millions of Chinese stacked on top of each other would produce a lack of isolation.
Please leave the rest of the world alone. Thankyou.
This is reflected in the bell curves - women have less variation than men. This is why more boys are born than girls - more boys die because they tend to take chances growing up.
Birth rates are generally pretty close with less than a .1% variance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sex_ratio
As for taking chances growing up meaning more boys die... citation please (i expect you have none as collecting data on this would be impossible). What about gender specific diseases such as breat cancer altering that ratio? What about the impact of certain mental illnesses being different between the sexes? Perhaps men have a higher rate of birth (again less than .1%) because they are more likely to be affected by X chromosome health issues and a higher birth rate is a built redundancy.
What biological expense of child birth? Women live longer than men. If women incur a 'biological expense' death rates certainly don't support your argument. http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1827162,00.html
Please provide data confirming that women are risk adverse more so than men. Your bell curve argument is hack science and you argument(s) over all are weak. Your 'business requires the ability to take risk and so men are better at it' is long bow to draw as well. Australians richest woman (and one of the richest people in the world) is a woman, same for the PM, same for an ex New Zealand PM and the list goes on.
"We could not participate in the government’s Women-Owned Small Business program unless there was another female competitor,” -- you can still compete for tenders though, you know as one innovative company against a group of other innovative companies. What is really the issue is you don't want to compete against others... just a small subset. What is really the problem here is that the 'protection racket' only kicks in when there are two or more companies eligible for protection. What ever happend to ROI, competition and most suitable candidate? All this says indirectly is "If you can't beat the boys don't worry dear, we'll make a special playgroud just for you and your girlfriends, no matter how less capable you are. So much for "women doin it for themselves"
How about fireworks. Are fireworks at a wedding acceptable to you? Because you can bet if they started launching fireworks they get nailed as well. It is socially acceptable to fire guns in celebration in MANY countries, hell ANZAC day in Australia they fire guns, cannons, artillery all kinds of shit, they do it in the US as well, have you ever attended a military parade or funeral. Oh... what you mean is they should not fire guns in celebration while there is an occupying force in their country. Nice one. I wonder how many of those guns are relics supplied by the US to help fight the soviets. You're a dick.
"Few koalas live outside Australia, but the U.S. government designated the animal as endangered in response to a petition filed by animal-protection groups. The Australian government, which bans hunting and commercial use of koalas, sees no scientific evidence that it is likely to become endangered anytime soon." http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/05/0510_020510_TVkoala.html So basically the US who have no idea what is going on in Australia BOW DOWN TO SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS and list it as endangered. Meanwhile in Australia in certain areas Koalas are so prolific they are hurting their environment. As for the rain forrest MASSIVE amounts of Australian rainforest is protected. I can only guess what the BS in PBS stands for. You're a dick. If you really want to get pissed about something try the Japanese hunting wales for 'Research Purposes'... or better yet fix your own country first.
I tend to agree. If the USA wasn't running wars with no clear finish line to support military industrial complex lobbyists and interest groups you would have trillions of dollars to spend on health, education, infrastructure etc. Seriously how do you guys do it? Even if you spent those trillions on subsidies to get manufacturing back into your country you would be better off than waging a single war (let alone at least three - drugs, iraq, afganistan), you'd have a stimulated economy and jobs. Instead your letting China buy your bonds so you can expose yourself to even higher debt levels... the very country that we continually get told is hacking you guys left right and center. The very country that has all the ex-USA jobs shipped overseas, while those with jobs piss into the wind to bail out gready wall street execs and coprorations with more rights than the people and cash to nullify the law. At the same time you ship your youth off to be killed and injured by people on the other side of the world who will continue to do so because of religious belief. It's not a war to them, it is a way of life, fighting them just fuels their hatred. In return you generate more agression towards your country which only then serves to provide an excuse for your civil and human rights to be taken away right in front of your faces and your children molested and radiated at airports. You guys truely deserve the title 'Planet America' because you are so far down the WTF hole the rest of the world is stunned and views you in some kind of alternate reality. I don't know if Ron Paul can fix this but you have to do something massive and out of the box or you guys are screwed. I'm not hating on Americans but seriously the rest of the world has a front row seat to a film called 'How to implode an empire'.
It is not happening in the US so why draw that comparison? Contrary to what the US believes US law doesn't apply everywhere. If it did the US couldn't create legal black holes such as Guantanamo when it suits their needs. Oh and how can one 'intrude' on a global, multi jurisdiction public network? And all proxies are masquerading on behalf of other peers. Fake information is illegal? Facebook and Google might want you to think so but.... in a word... No.
Some would argue that American english is bad english.