Yeah, that might be related to the fact that the media are 100% in the tank for Hillary
And they've showed just how in the tank they are for Hillary by accurately quoting Donald Trump.
But when it comes to Hillary Clinton's shady "I'll be your Presidential whore if you give me cash" promises to Wall Street
Is that really what you think she said in those speeches? Have you actually read the excerpts?
These "bombshells" Assange is dropping are duds. Even the ones that are fabricated aren't really damning. His little fan dance from the balcony has permanently destroyed his credibility and Wikileaks turning into the Cyrillic-language organ of the Alt-Right has permanently damaged theirs. And Trump continues to fall like an overstuffed garbage bag from a tenement window.
They're not religious figures, some of us agree more with their logic than you.
Our failures have usually been failures to adhere to principle and earlier law
You can hardly blame anyone, since the Founding Fathers didn't adhere to their own "logic" and "principles".
This is why, if you're really going to have the consent of the governed, you've got to give those people a way to provide consent (ie: constitutional conventions). The world is very different today than in 1789.
Yes, because everyone know, you have to mow down thousands of acres of trees to build a platform and processing area that is smaller than one acre in size...
No, they don't have to. They just do that part for the fun of it.
Conceptually, our government was never designed to have so many government agents or taxes doing these activities on or against the citizens.
It also wasn't designed NOT to have big government and taxes.
This is what you get for turning the Founding Fathers into religious figures and the Constitution into religious text. We should have had at least half a dozen constitutional conventions since 1789.
"In fact, let's go back in history and find all the women who slaughtered millions of people. Find a woman leader of color, queen, empress, etc who committed mass murder. Please, go ahead. I'll wait here."
You must have missed Biljana Plavsic's war crimes trial.
Biljana Plavi is no more a war criminal than George Bush or Dwight Eisenhower. She fell on the sword and went to the Hague voluntarily so she would take the punishment instead of her country.
No, I wanted women who are murderous tyrants who killed tens of thousands to tens of millions. But you already know that and are just trying to turn this into a race war.
The best you can come up with is Queen Mary, who killed some 200-something four hundred and sixty-three years ago and is still compared unfavorably to "Bluff King Hal" who killed 72,000.
Dumb fuck. Four hundred and sixty three years ago, "Bloody Queen Mary" killed 284 heretics. Henry the VIII killed 72,000, but the nicknames are "Bloody" Queen Mary and "Bluff" King Hal.
That's what's known as "male privilege".
Hitler kills six million Jews, and there's still Nazi cosplay going on. Here, for example. Check these guys out at the Nevada Trump rally:
Wait...so Obama and the Dems havetheir panties in a bunch because Russia (supposedly) just did pretty much what Yahoo just did at the behest of the Obama and the Dems.
Are you really that stupid? Do you understand the qualitative difference between the American government operating on American soil and the Russian government operating on American soil? You believe there is a moral equivalence?
Let's put it this way: If a cop kills a guy in the US, there might well be a discussion about excessive force, over-policing, etc etc. But if a Russian agent kills a guy in the US, it becomes a very different discussion and much different by degree. Don't you agree?
Don't forget the ULTIMATE evil in the world: White HETEROSEXUAL men.
Well, since you brought it up, if you go down the list of the most murderous tyrants in just say, the past 200 years, it's pretty much 100% heterosexual white males.
For example, see how many women and people of color you find on this list:
In fact, let's go back in history and find all the women who slaughtered millions of people. Find a woman leader of color, queen, empress, etc who committed mass murder. Please, go ahead. I'll wait here. So at least there's a compelling argument for white heterosexual males being the ultimate evil in the world. I'm not saying I agree with the assessment, but you might want to think twice before sarcastically bringing the issue up.
So you're saying if the government offered the populace a small cash incentive to exercise, people would do it
No, they wouldn't. They'd continue to be lazy slobs for the most part, and the people who would do it don't need a "small cash incentive" because they're already doing it. If an improvement in your life and health and happiness isn't enough, a coupon's not going to make a difference.
People like this fat pig, for example, for whom life is just about living off the government teat and self-gratification: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o00Noel...
Slashdot Mirror
Ol, you've gotten into the single-malt again, haven't you? You better save a taste for me.
And they've showed just how in the tank they are for Hillary by accurately quoting Donald Trump.
Is that really what you think she said in those speeches? Have you actually read the excerpts?
These "bombshells" Assange is dropping are duds. Even the ones that are fabricated aren't really damning. His little fan dance from the balcony has permanently destroyed his credibility and Wikileaks turning into the Cyrillic-language organ of the Alt-Right has permanently damaged theirs. And Trump continues to fall like an overstuffed garbage bag from a tenement window.
Yes, Trump is crushing that pussy, all right.
http://projects.fivethirtyeigh...
You can hardly blame anyone, since the Founding Fathers didn't adhere to their own "logic" and "principles".
This is why, if you're really going to have the consent of the governed, you've got to give those people a way to provide consent (ie: constitutional conventions). The world is very different today than in 1789.
Yeah, I keep my ascii porn on 3.5" floppy disks too.
No, they don't have to. They just do that part for the fun of it.
That could work, except you'd have to convince the energy industry not to kill the motherfucking plant so it can drill and frack.
https://www.scientificamerican...
Bye Felicia.
It also wasn't designed NOT to have big government and taxes.
This is what you get for turning the Founding Fathers into religious figures and the Constitution into religious text. We should have had at least half a dozen constitutional conventions since 1789.
Not "suggesting" anything. Just stating that mass murderers are all men.
Here is what I said:
Maybe you can do better than your compatriots.
YOU'LL EAT THOSE WORDS YOU MONSTER.;
Biljana Plavi is no more a war criminal than George Bush or Dwight Eisenhower. She fell on the sword and went to the Hague voluntarily so she would take the punishment instead of her country.
She's a national hero in Belgrade.
Come on. You can do better than Biljana Plavi.
No, I wanted women who are murderous tyrants who killed tens of thousands to tens of millions. But you already know that and are just trying to turn this into a race war.
The best you can come up with is Queen Mary, who killed some 200-something four hundred and sixty-three years ago and is still compared unfavorably to "Bluff King Hal" who killed 72,000.
Genocide is just part of male privilege, I guess.
Those guys were pikers compared to Hitler and Stalin. And were all heterosexual men.
Dumb fuck. Four hundred and sixty three years ago, "Bloody Queen Mary" killed 284 heretics. Henry the VIII killed 72,000, but the nicknames are "Bloody" Queen Mary and "Bluff" King Hal.
That's what's known as "male privilege".
Hitler kills six million Jews, and there's still Nazi cosplay going on. Here, for example. Check these guys out at the Nevada Trump rally:
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/1...
Are you really that stupid? Do you understand the qualitative difference between the American government operating on American soil and the Russian government operating on American soil? You believe there is a moral equivalence?
Let's put it this way: If a cop kills a guy in the US, there might well be a discussion about excessive force, over-policing, etc etc. But if a Russian agent kills a guy in the US, it becomes a very different discussion and much different by degree. Don't you agree?
Well, since you brought it up, if you go down the list of the most murderous tyrants in just say, the past 200 years, it's pretty much 100% heterosexual white males.
For example, see how many women and people of color you find on this list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Now count all the women and people of color on this list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
In fact, let's go back in history and find all the women who slaughtered millions of people. Find a woman leader of color, queen, empress, etc who committed mass murder. Please, go ahead. I'll wait here. So at least there's a compelling argument for white heterosexual males being the ultimate evil in the world. I'm not saying I agree with the assessment, but you might want to think twice before sarcastically bringing the issue up.
When I'm president, the Russians won't hack us any more. They won't have to.
Thank you, Shirley, but I'm a little shocked. Next I suppose you'll tell me that the second verse of Stairway to Heaven is also not in the Bible.
Either that, or the whole thing was made up.
That's my favorite Bible verse.
They are subsidized by the Fed, who loan them money at 0% and by the government, which allows them to turn around and lend that free money at >20%.
And, they're subsidized by having capital requirements of less than 5%, so they can take the same dollar and loan it out 20 times.
The card companies are only proxies for their member institutions, remember.
Because they are a federally subsidized and insured bank with monopolistic allowances.
If you want to be able to borrow money at 0% and lend it at 20%, then fuck you, do as you are told.
No, they wouldn't. They'd continue to be lazy slobs for the most part, and the people who would do it don't need a "small cash incentive" because they're already doing it. If an improvement in your life and health and happiness isn't enough, a coupon's not going to make a difference.
People like this fat pig, for example, for whom life is just about living off the government teat and self-gratification: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o00Noel...