why does it matter that he did it in 1995? anybody else would have been successful? that was the one year that losing is somehow worse than any other year?
Because '94-'95 were years when commercial real estate was booming.
Losing money on real estate in 1995 would be like losing money selling cocaine in Miami in 1980.
Wait, so you're telling us that a big league con woman instead of the small-time con man?
Yes. Social and military history teach that when it comes to leaders, self-serving competence beats self-serving bumbling every single time.
Wouldn't it make more sense to reject BOTH of the con artists?
It's all about harm reduction. The "lesser of two evils" is a perfectly legitimate way to vote, and has been thus for as long as humans have voted.
And when it comes right down to it, even among four candidates, I will always side with the one that unequivocally believes that vaccination is a good thing.
do you think it is worth mentioning the servers have a folder on them called "pay to play" or a spreadsheet tracking banks that got TARP money's large donations to top Dems? Or a file called "Wall Street money by committee" or a file tracking donors to Hilary's campaign?
You're very close to the truth, but you're ignoring the obvious. You honestly believe that a guilty party is going to put evidence into a folder called "pay to play"? Or, "Wall Street money by committee"?
I'm surprised there's not a folder called, "Evidence against Killary". You've been had. Again.
Before anyone says these are fake, people have been dialing the numbers in these leaks and verifying that the contact info is legit.
The contact info of major corporations and donors is public information.
I invite people reading this to go take a look at the actual documents that Guccifer2 has released. I'll bet you'll see what's wrong with them right away. Go ahead, look at them now. I'll wait.
This Guccifer2 leak is what Assange was supposed to release at 3am, but then Assange noticed the same thing: the docs are a hoax. That's why there was no October surprise this morning.
Slashdot Mirror
Because '94-'95 were years when commercial real estate was booming.
Losing money on real estate in 1995 would be like losing money selling cocaine in Miami in 1980.
That is a list of casinos that never opened.
And if you were to actually look at the list, you wouldn't find a single casino that went bankrupt in 1994-95.
This is why you should always look at the pages you cite so you don't look foolish.
Look, I agree that Martin Shkreli is an execrable worm, but I think putting a bounty on him is a little extreme.
But just for the record, how much would this bounty be? Asking for a friend.
Tomorrow:
A Slashdot Q & A with Brock Turner.
You are adorable when you're so mad.
Yes. Social and military history teach that when it comes to leaders, self-serving competence beats self-serving bumbling every single time.
It's all about harm reduction. The "lesser of two evils" is a perfectly legitimate way to vote, and has been thus for as long as humans have voted.
And when it comes right down to it, even among four candidates, I will always side with the one that unequivocally believes that vaccination is a good thing.
*blushes*
As an idiot, I would like to sign up for all this money you speak of that's being given out for the giant garbage patch.
If I get some of this money, do I get upgraded to "genius" status or do I maintain my idiocy?
Because it's really a tiny garbage patch. A complete loser garbage patch. A weak garbage patch.
When I'm president, we'll have a garbage patch that'll make your head spin. A big, classy garbage patch that Americans can finally be proud of.
I volunteer to do peer review.
I've always admired people with three first names. My family was poor so I only got the one.
Oh hell no. Hillary lied about all that stuff. But she's still lightyears better than the small-time con man.
And if you've been following the news, you know that Guccifer2's "leak" has been debunked.
I'm sorry if I sounded sarcastic. I really do believe phones are plenty thin. And I only called you grandpa in deference to your impressively low UID.
You didn't look, did you?
"Streaming dongle" sounds like the side effect of a drug you see advertised on MeTV.
You're very close to the truth, but you're ignoring the obvious. You honestly believe that a guilty party is going to put evidence into a folder called "pay to play"? Or, "Wall Street money by committee"?
I'm surprised there's not a folder called, "Evidence against Killary". You've been had. Again.
The contact info of major corporations and donors is public information.
I invite people reading this to go take a look at the actual documents that Guccifer2 has released. I'll bet you'll see what's wrong with them right away. Go ahead, look at them now. I'll wait.
This Guccifer2 leak is what Assange was supposed to release at 3am, but then Assange noticed the same thing: the docs are a hoax. That's why there was no October surprise this morning.
Yes, and increased the number of rear-end accidents by 22% which is what this entire argument is about.
I can help with that:
http://bigthink.com/ideafeed/s...
And here are links to the actual studies (11 of which are peer-reviewed).
https://www.motorists.org/issu...
I'd play it the same way.
That was my point, Bob. I think you misunderstood my comment.
I can't think of a more perfect person than Martin Shkreli to buy 4chan. It's ideal, really.
Listen to grandpa. Phones are thin enough.
If you spent $300 on a "stereo upgrade" in your car, then you're probably a little simple.
I'm not sure the debate preparation is working.