Which GS people committed which crimes for which they should be in prison? Please be specific.
Lloyd Blankfein, CEO. See the presentence investigative report on him and Goldman from 2010.
He traded against his clients, which is a crime. Then he lied to the FBI and Congress about doing so. That's conflict of interest, fraud and perjury.
Now it's up to you to explain why he should NOT have gone to jail for these crimes other than the fact that Goldman controls the Fed. Please be specific.
Half-Life 3 will never happen. It's not in Valve's commercial interest any more.
That's why I said "ink a deal". They need to sell the property to someone who will make the game. The game won't make them any money as long as it's unmade.
I have to fight the urge to hit that man, never mind trust him.
That is absolutely everyone's reaction to Ted Cruz. It's really uncanny.
All kidding aside, I'm not completely comfortable with having as a president who will have to deal with foreign leaders someone who everyone just wants to punch in the face on sight.
In some of those places I recommend Kevlar fashions if you work the second or third shifts. And leave the Nikes and jewelry at home.
Do you know a city in the world where there are not high-crime areas? And in Chicago, it's mainly at night. You can travel through any neighborhood on public trans and be pretty safe, if you know how to act.
On the Republican side, Trump scores a net negative of -33, with a favorable rating of 24% compared to 57% of voters who view him unfavorably. On the Democratic side, Clinton fares only slightly better with a net negative of -21, registering a 31% favorable rating and a 52% unfavorable rating, according to the poll.
God, you're a dumbshit. You're still trying to prove having a toddler in the backseat is more distracting than texting on a cell phone by citing an article that claims toddlers are more distracting than talking on a cell phone.
Here's the first paragraph from the article you cite:
In a first-of-its-kind study, Monash University researchers have found children are 12 times more distracting to a driver than talking on a mobile phone while at the wheel.
Knucklehead, the study you link to compares a toddler in the back seat to talking on a cell phone, not texting on a cell phone. See the headline on this story?
You can talk and keep your eyes on the road. You cannot text and keep your eyes on the road.
You should work on your understanding of this issue. Texting while driving is dangerous like drinking while driving. If you can't drive responsibly, you shouldn't be allowed to put other peoples' lives at risk. This is not too difficult to understand. Do you perchance happen to text while driving, and are getting all defensive?
I'm sick of you nanny-state SJWs who want to make the roads all "safe". Laws against texting while driving are censorship against my free speech. You're saying it's OK to be feminist while driving but not for me to text while driving. It's 1984 all over again.
I'm pretty sure you can find urban centers in the United States. There's absolutely no place inside the Chicago city limits that you can't get to on public transportation, and buildings are not deliberately spaced far apart.
Exactly. Opinions don't matter in this case. It's all about who can argue the point honestly and effectively.
Bill Nye does exactly that. He keeps it simple and elementary, so that even climate deniers can understand. So all they have left is the opposite of a GOP candidate saying, "I'm not a scientist". By saying "You're no scientist", they leave unspoken the punchline: You don't have to be a scientist to understand climate change, because scientists have already done the work on this for you.
Nope we'll just ignore it. We like/. just fine. It's a great platform to poke progressives on the political stuff that comes up far to frequently on a tech site.
This is what's known as the "I'm not mad, I'm actually laughing" defense. It never works, but don't tell them.
Slashdot Mirror
Now you're just being obtuse. I give you links to peer-reviewed studies and you come back and tell me you need to see the raw data.
Here's a list of 21 peer-reviewed papers on UBI.
http://www.basicincomecanada.o...
Here's a link to a journal that is nothing BUT peer-reviewed papers showing how UBI works.
http://www.degruyter.com/view/...
When you've finished those, come back to me and let's see if you're still asking to "see the numbers".
http://frac.org/initiatives/american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act/snapfood-stamps-provide-real-stimulus/
If you're walking down a busy street gazing down at your cell phone, I'd like to install my shoe up your ass.
Lloyd Blankfein, CEO. See the presentence investigative report on him and Goldman from 2010.
He traded against his clients, which is a crime. Then he lied to the FBI and Congress about doing so. That's conflict of interest, fraud and perjury.
Now it's up to you to explain why he should NOT have gone to jail for these crimes other than the fact that Goldman controls the Fed. Please be specific.
http://www.rollingstone.com/po...
http://www.reuters.com/article...
I could go for Portal 3 right about now.
That's why I said "ink a deal". They need to sell the property to someone who will make the game. The game won't make them any money as long as it's unmade.
That is absolutely everyone's reaction to Ted Cruz. It's really uncanny.
All kidding aside, I'm not completely comfortable with having as a president who will have to deal with foreign leaders someone who everyone just wants to punch in the face on sight.
I wish Valve would ink a fucking deal to make Half-Life 3. I don't need their movies.
How could you not trust an app from this man?
https://media.salon.com/2013/1...
It's really simple. Every $1 put in someone's pocket via redistribution from the top creates nearly $2 in economic growth.
Do you know a city in the world where there are not high-crime areas? And in Chicago, it's mainly at night. You can travel through any neighborhood on public trans and be pretty safe, if you know how to act.
You must be one a them SJWs.
Oh, and whoosh.
You might want to check your arithmetic.
God, you're a dumbshit. You're still trying to prove having a toddler in the backseat is more distracting than texting on a cell phone by citing an article that claims toddlers are more distracting than talking on a cell phone.
Here's the first paragraph from the article you cite:
Knucklehead, the study you link to compares a toddler in the back seat to talking on a cell phone, not texting on a cell phone. See the headline on this story?
You can talk and keep your eyes on the road. You cannot text and keep your eyes on the road.
I'm sick of you nanny-state SJWs who want to make the roads all "safe". Laws against texting while driving are censorship against my free speech. You're saying it's OK to be feminist while driving but not for me to text while driving. It's 1984 all over again.
I'm pretty sure you can find urban centers in the United States. There's absolutely no place inside the Chicago city limits that you can't get to on public transportation, and buildings are not deliberately spaced far apart.
Certainly, my anonymous and cowardly friend.
https://www.imf.org/external/p...
Exactly. Opinions don't matter in this case. It's all about who can argue the point honestly and effectively.
Bill Nye does exactly that. He keeps it simple and elementary, so that even climate deniers can understand. So all they have left is the opposite of a GOP candidate saying, "I'm not a scientist". By saying "You're no scientist", they leave unspoken the punchline: You don't have to be a scientist to understand climate change, because scientists have already done the work on this for you.
One...two...
Someone or something?
This is what's known as the "I'm not mad, I'm actually laughing" defense. It never works, but don't tell them.
You must be one a them "Ethno-Nationalists".
Buddy, I need to talk to you about maybe doing a little point-shaving in the next Super Bowl. There's money to be made.
I'll show you ageism, you little shits. If I have to get out of this chair, somebody's gonna cry.