Please see the legal definition of secured. You secure financing when you have a deal done. There is NO securing a deal before it is complete. If he does not have funds committed in the amount of $72 billion, he's committed fraud. You can try to justify it all you want, but it definitely appears that Musk stepped in it, legally.
And from the other/. story (where he's talking with the Saudis to help fund the idea), his funding was not secured. It's not available, the source to supply it has not agreed yet.
I would wager that information was already available prior to the tweet. It has likely already been provided to the SEC along with a box of chocolates.
Then the SEC already had the information and would not be investigating his claim.
Do you think he is that stupid?
When his vindictive, knee-jerk response side comes out? Yes. Witness calling a rescue diver a pedophile, and blowing off investors' questions with flippant remarks. He's a loose cannon, and this is probably a case of firing before the breech was closed.
If Musk cannot prove in a timely manner (typically 5 to 10 days) that the price AND the offer to take private was valid, he just committed securities fraud. By manipulating the stock price. Regardless of him selling or buying shares.
Who would that superpower be? China? Russia? Neither can field the mobile assets of the US - and both have massive, fixed infrastructures and population centers that would be prime "MAD" targets for a space-based system. Space-based kinetic weapons pretty much eliminate the need for strategic nuclear weapons. A few tons of nickel or tungsten sprinkled from orbit will do orders of magnitude more damage than a B52 strike...
Actual statistics are radically different, and actually prove that "mesothelioma deaths decreased among persons aged 35–44, 45–54, and 55–64 years". It's really a concern for a tiny sub-population over the age of 75 who tended to work with raw asbestos insulation before its dangers were well known.
So what you're saying is, that financial information on Facebook has been validated and vetted by Facebook as accurate? That anything I read on Facebook is a solid financial recommendation and will make me rich
Thank you, Mark Zuckerberg! I don't need my broker anymore, I have Facebook!
Not as young as you think, being close to 3 score years. Think of the Iraq war (either of them) - eliminate 90% of the flown sorties with high ground. Owning space allows you to hold off superpowers (those with massive infrastructure and cities) for "cheap" and then concentrate your conventional forces on guerrilla warfare like has happened since 1776... Some of us just think bigger than the last war, and realize there are threats out there more than just terrorists...
So then, it makes sense in that you can hold off the "superpower" potential enemies with the high ground, and better equip your conventional forces for unconventional warfare. Much like there is a role for the batteleship and the LCS, owning space allows you to deny access to large swaths of land - or the threat of massive annihilation of valuable assets like cities and infrastructure - for relatively low cost. Big pieces of tungsten or nickel dropped from on high are all you need.
SG&A increases linearly because Tesla owns the sales channel. There's a reason other companies like Ford, GM, BMW have an SG&A less than 10% of revenues, despite the heavy advertising - they don't own the sales channel. Sales channel costs are "offloaded" from the company. In Tesla, it's structurally bound to revenue. Sales expenses necessarily increase linearly with revenues. But that's OK - you go on with your thoughts! Come back to me when Q3 data is released and - once again - SG&A is around 19-20% of revenues AND Tesla - once again - loses money.
High ground always wins. Space is the ultimate high ground - control that, and you can relax your worries about holding oceans, mountains, fields, etc.
Germany was quite peaceful in 1939, thanks to its strong military and authoritarian government.
You mean other than demands of land from neighbors, and invasions of Czechoslovakia, Austria, Lithuania - and of course the 1936 militarization of the Rhineland? That peace?
Release SW is typically set a few months before shipments - and that was before Pie was ready. Give it a month or two, your carrier will most likely have an update for the SW coming as soon as it's ready.
Because China would be the Orient. Eastern Asia would be Bangladesh and Burma. Please see the British for the proper definition of Asian and Oriental...
Slashdot Mirror
Please see the legal definition of secured. You secure financing when you have a deal done. There is NO securing a deal before it is complete. If he does not have funds committed in the amount of $72 billion, he's committed fraud. You can try to justify it all you want, but it definitely appears that Musk stepped in it, legally.
And from the other /. story (where he's talking with the Saudis to help fund the idea), his funding was not secured. It's not available, the source to supply it has not agreed yet.
In a legal, SEC "I can release the information" standard, yes secured funding has a very specific meaning. Meaning - you have it.
When funding is secured, it is effectively "in-hand"; it is irrevocable, committed, and available instantly. If Musk doesn't have that...
I would wager that information was already available prior to the tweet. It has likely already been provided to the SEC along with a box of chocolates.
Then the SEC already had the information and would not be investigating his claim.
Do you think he is that stupid?
When his vindictive, knee-jerk response side comes out? Yes. Witness calling a rescue diver a pedophile, and blowing off investors' questions with flippant remarks. He's a loose cannon, and this is probably a case of firing before the breech was closed.
He confirmed that funding was secured. Meaning - already in-hand. If not, then that is securities fraud.
If Musk cannot prove in a timely manner (typically 5 to 10 days) that the price AND the offer to take private was valid, he just committed securities fraud. By manipulating the stock price. Regardless of him selling or buying shares.
Peace and harmony - Springtime for Hitler and Germany!
Who would that superpower be? China? Russia? Neither can field the mobile assets of the US - and both have massive, fixed infrastructures and population centers that would be prime "MAD" targets for a space-based system. Space-based kinetic weapons pretty much eliminate the need for strategic nuclear weapons. A few tons of nickel or tungsten sprinkled from orbit will do orders of magnitude more damage than a B52 strike...
Actual statistics are radically different, and actually prove that "mesothelioma deaths decreased among persons aged 35–44, 45–54, and 55–64 years". It's really a concern for a tiny sub-population over the age of 75 who tended to work with raw asbestos insulation before its dangers were well known.
So what you're saying is, that financial information on Facebook has been validated and vetted by Facebook as accurate? That anything I read on Facebook is a solid financial recommendation and will make me rich
Thank you, Mark Zuckerberg! I don't need my broker anymore, I have Facebook!
Sphere? What a load of tripe! Everyone KNOWS that maps are accurate, and they are FLAT, Mr. smarty-pants! Damn round-earthers...
Not as young as you think, being close to 3 score years. Think of the Iraq war (either of them) - eliminate 90% of the flown sorties with high ground. Owning space allows you to hold off superpowers (those with massive infrastructure and cities) for "cheap" and then concentrate your conventional forces on guerrilla warfare like has happened since 1776... Some of us just think bigger than the last war, and realize there are threats out there more than just terrorists...
So then, it makes sense in that you can hold off the "superpower" potential enemies with the high ground, and better equip your conventional forces for unconventional warfare. Much like there is a role for the batteleship and the LCS, owning space allows you to deny access to large swaths of land - or the threat of massive annihilation of valuable assets like cities and infrastructure - for relatively low cost. Big pieces of tungsten or nickel dropped from on high are all you need.
SG&A increases linearly because Tesla owns the sales channel. There's a reason other companies like Ford, GM, BMW have an SG&A less than 10% of revenues, despite the heavy advertising - they don't own the sales channel. Sales channel costs are "offloaded" from the company. In Tesla, it's structurally bound to revenue. Sales expenses necessarily increase linearly with revenues. But that's OK - you go on with your thoughts! Come back to me when Q3 data is released and - once again - SG&A is around 19-20% of revenues AND Tesla - once again - loses money.
High ground always wins. Space is the ultimate high ground - control that, and you can relax your worries about holding oceans, mountains, fields, etc.
Germany was quite peaceful in 1939, thanks to its strong military and authoritarian government.
You mean other than demands of land from neighbors, and invasions of Czechoslovakia, Austria, Lithuania - and of course the 1936 militarization of the Rhineland? That peace?
They have so far.
Other than blowing up satellites with space weapons, you mean...
Here are some phones and devices that LineageOS - and you don't have to load any Google apps.
My Verizon Note 5 still gets updates, and my current Note 8 is updated rather frequently. It's not just Samsung, it's also your carrier...
Release SW is typically set a few months before shipments - and that was before Pie was ready. Give it a month or two, your carrier will most likely have an update for the SW coming as soon as it's ready.
I live at the magnetic North Pole you insensitive clod!
Because China would be the Orient. Eastern Asia would be Bangladesh and Burma. Please see the British for the proper definition of Asian and Oriental...
That could be a death sentence...
Straight-out question: did the US CO2 output drop and the EU CO2 output increase in 2017? Yes or no?