As a matter of historical fact, there were very few slaves enslaved by "white races". The vast majority of African slaves that were brought by "white races" were purchased from Arabs and Africans that lived on the coast.
Of course you will never believe that as it does not suit your racist philosophy.
It works out at 16 years and eight months not two months as he suggested. Seems he cannot do arithmetic even when it would benefit his argument. Not that either are really true any way. They might just get lucky and hit it with the first entry.
But they are not going to run a sequential test anyway, there will be realms of studies done on how to optimise such searches (search for password) so they are most likely to succeed before half the entries have been tested.
Ah! You are beginning to understand the founders and many other countries experiences with government. Never, ever trust a government. Even if it is the one you voted for and want. Never, ever trust it. People who desire power have ever growing appetites that can never be satisfied. They are not "people like us". Remember you have "a republic, if you can keep it".
It is still slowing down the phone omnly when the load capacity is exceeded. That is really not very much of the time. I suspect that Apple's engineers thought it insignificant. Yes, they should have been more public but I think they (mistakenly) didn't see the need. A mistake they are fixing. If anyone went out and bought a new phone because they thought the phone was "wearing out" has a rather pathetic understanding of technology. [Aside: It is not that they don't wear out, they do, but it is slow.] I mean investigating it should come to the issue real quick.
What makes you think Apple phones have slowed down? Despite all the clamour, they have not been "slowed". The processor frequency is only lowered while there is insufficient current. I cannot see how this can translate to "Apple slowed my phone. It is a lie. I have a four year old iPhone 6 and it has not slowed at all. Because the battery is fine (86% original capacity). I'm not the only one in this situation. In fact, I personally don't know anyone with this problem.
This is created story by all the droids who are anxious to prove that their worship of google was the right thing. Now the evidence is in and they picked the insecure charlatans. They have to prove Apple is worse and they cannot do this with any truth. It is likely Apple will get hit bad in some places. Very unjustly.
You sir, are dishonest. I am an atheist and my moral code is strong and established by my choices. The reason I am an atheist is that you and your religious compatriots follow the moral codes of "gods" that do not have any morals themselves.
You naked a public statement that implies I am mentally incompetent, that I and others like me "are not capable of creating the necessary philosophical and mental framework that supports the existence of a populous and culture that embraces values of personal integrity and policies based on hard data and logic."
I think it's very clear from all the news coverage that Apple was very well aware that their phones would only last a year and made a choice between the processor and the battery.
And that is the issue. You are not honest. It is clear that that is counter to the truth. You are not honest or you are stupid beyond all belief. If that you claim were the truth then how can this 3+ year old iPhone 6 on its original battery that is sitting in front of me exist. You have no evidence for malfeasance and plenty to suggest otherwise.
Fool or liar. Pick one. Only choices you have left yourself.
Nope. Your first sentence tells exactly why the comparison is valid. You make all kind of assumptions and then use them as reasoned acts. They are not and you have no idea why Apple does what it does.
But still you make the claim "which is why" and assume it fact. Dubbing you Lennart seems bloody accurate. Same kind of bloody mined "I decide the facts" attitude.
The sum total of these choices is enough to establish likelihood of intent.
That is just pure self agrandising bullshit. You judge the choices and you decide the guilt. You are right the law does not work that way. You are not the judge. As a rule the law does not treat conspiracy theories well and that is all you have. A silly conspiracy theory that ignores all counter evidence. You have joined the 'get apple' religion and nothing will sway you from your faith.
PS. Would you like to re-evaluate that 'PS" after you have learnt something about scheduling about scheduling, normal CPU usage and a whole swathe of other things you clearly do not understand. Servers require high CPU usage to save dollar costs but for most multi, general use devices (see definition of a computer) that is far from the case. Always, always, always there is contention between process. There is an inevitable trade off. Your fast machines are the idle ones, the slowest ones are the ones with the highest CPU utilisation. Do you understand that using Von Neuman machines makes this inevitable? Increasing cores and threads can only partly address this.
Are you Lennart Poettering perchance? You display similar misunderstandings./p.
The first sentence states it would be better solution to... Better for whom? I am going to replace a (still functioning perfectly - 86%) battery next December for $29. At that time it will be about five years old. That sounds pretty damned good to me. Why would I expect a free re-placement on an over 2 year old, out of guarantee battery? Unless I am just a greedy fuck. Is this some sort of entitled millennial meme?
The only phone to have this problem? Erm... Would you like to go see bout all the battery fault Samsung have had (repeatedly) There is even a new one now. Brand new Samsungs that simply won't recharge. Have you ever heard of confirmation bias?
And wankery can flood the forum to (in fact that is more common).
The fraud is clear: Apple let customers wlith old iphone versions believe their own phone was faulty, which increased iphone sales. Every customer who upgraded his/her iphone could claim compensation. Apple's excuses won't wash: lying to users about the cause will make them liable; and the slowdown was entirely the result of avoidable design choices - choices not disclosed to users.
No fraud has been demostqrsted. Fraud requires intent, in order to prove fraud your must be able to demonstrate mens rea. I don't think you can so good luck.
The rest of your post is just garbage. You cannot demonstrate the lie that you claim exits and there is no slowdown unless the battery will cause a crash. The lowdown ends the microsecond the stress stops. The alternative would be to let the phone crash. That has dangerous implications. It was the right choice.
If any of the class actions succeed it will not be on technical issues. They put in a good fix. A lot of people who do not understand it are squawking about it (and lots of people are going "Free Money!") so Apple responded with a change and are changing (not fixing) the software so there is no cause for any complaint. Being that Apple has responded to user input in a quick and timely fashion there is not much scope for accusation of misbehaviour. Like people, corporations are not necessarily expected to be right all the time but they must be responsive when and if they are wrong. Just like you.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm in Australia, never been to America but I second d that comment
If you call the lousy medical outcomes in your country "flourishing" you have to be young.
There are no gods. And if they were they would owe explanations as to why they are such terrible beings.
As a matter of historical fact, there were very few slaves enslaved by "white races". The vast majority of African slaves that were brought by "white races" were purchased from Arabs and Africans that lived on the coast.
Of course you will never believe that as it does not suit your racist philosophy.
Yes, you still demonstrate trust in that statement.
It works out at 16 years and eight months not two months as he suggested. Seems he cannot do arithmetic even when it would benefit his argument. Not that either are really true any way. They might just get lucky and hit it with the first entry.
But they are not going to run a sequential test anyway, there will be realms of studies done on how to optimise such searches (search for password) so they are most likely to succeed before half the entries have been tested.
Ah! You are beginning to understand the founders and many other countries experiences with government. Never, ever trust a government. Even if it is the one you voted for and want. Never, ever trust it. People who desire power have ever growing appetites that can never be satisfied. They are not "people like us". Remember you have "a republic, if you can keep it".
Finch
There you go....
Has it? Read again with eyes and mind open
No, they just buy their own politicians. They do not need to vote when they own both candidates.
It is still slowing down the phone omnly when the load capacity is exceeded. That is really not very much of the time. I suspect that Apple's engineers thought it insignificant. Yes, they should have been more public but I think they (mistakenly) didn't see the need. A mistake they are fixing. If anyone went out and bought a new phone because they thought the phone was "wearing out" has a rather pathetic understanding of technology. [Aside: It is not that they don't wear out, they do, but it is slow.] I mean investigating it should come to the issue real quick.
What makes you think Apple phones have slowed down? Despite all the clamour, they have not been "slowed". The processor frequency is only lowered while there is insufficient current. I cannot see how this can translate to "Apple slowed my phone. It is a lie. I have a four year old iPhone 6 and it has not slowed at all. Because the battery is fine (86% original capacity). I'm not the only one in this situation. In fact, I personally don't know anyone with this problem.
This is created story by all the droids who are anxious to prove that their worship of google was the right thing. Now the evidence is in and they picked the insecure charlatans. They have to prove Apple is worse and they cannot do this with any truth. It is likely Apple will get hit bad in some places. Very unjustly.
Christ is supposed to have said he was the son of god. Given that, any christian who believes in christ believes in god. I don't.
Yes.
You sir, are dishonest. I am an atheist and my moral code is strong and established by my choices. The reason I am an atheist is that you and your religious compatriots follow the moral codes of "gods" that do not have any morals themselves.
You naked a public statement that implies I am mentally incompetent, that I and others like me "are not capable of creating the necessary philosophical and mental framework that supports the existence of a populous and culture that embraces values of personal integrity and policies based on hard data and logic."
You fail your own moral standards.
The bible is logical? I do not think so.
I think it's very clear from all the news coverage that Apple was very well aware that their phones would only last a year and made a choice between the processor and the battery.
And that is the issue. You are not honest. It is clear that that is counter to the truth. You are not honest or you are stupid beyond all belief. If that you claim were the truth then how can this 3+ year old iPhone 6 on its original battery that is sitting in front of me exist. You have no evidence for malfeasance and plenty to suggest otherwise.
Fool or liar. Pick one. Only choices you have left yourself.
Because I believe in innocent until proven guilty I am a hypocrite? Ha, ha, ha....
Poor little fascistii
Nope. Your first sentence tells exactly why the comparison is valid. You make all kind of assumptions and then use them as reasoned acts. They are not and you have no idea why Apple does what it does.
But still you make the claim "which is why" and assume it fact. Dubbing you Lennart seems bloody accurate. Same kind of bloody mined "I decide the facts" attitude.
The sum total of these choices is enough to establish likelihood of intent.
That is just pure self agrandising bullshit. You judge the choices and you decide the guilt. You are right the law does not work that way. You are not the judge. As a rule the law does not treat conspiracy theories well and that is all you have. A silly conspiracy theory that ignores all counter evidence. You have joined the 'get apple' religion and nothing will sway you from your faith.
PS. Would you like to re-evaluate that 'PS" after you have learnt something about scheduling about scheduling, normal CPU usage and a whole swathe of other things you clearly do not understand. Servers require high CPU usage to save dollar costs but for most multi, general use devices (see definition of a computer) that is far from the case. Always, always, always there is contention between process. There is an inevitable trade off. Your fast machines are the idle ones, the slowest ones are the ones with the highest CPU utilisation. Do you understand that using Von Neuman machines makes this inevitable? Increasing cores and threads can only partly address this.
Are you Lennart Poettering perchance? You display similar misunderstandings./p.
Err.... No, OS X is a BSD.
The first sentence states it would be better solution to... Better for whom? I am going to replace a (still functioning perfectly - 86%) battery next December for $29. At that time it will be about five years old. That sounds pretty damned good to me. Why would I expect a free re-placement on an over 2 year old, out of guarantee battery? Unless I am just a greedy fuck. Is this some sort of entitled millennial meme?
The only phone to have this problem? Erm... Would you like to go see bout all the battery fault Samsung have had (repeatedly) There is even a new one now. Brand new Samsungs that simply won't recharge. Have you ever heard of confirmation bias?
And wankery can flood the forum to (in fact that is more common).
The fraud is clear: Apple let customers wlith old iphone versions believe their own phone was faulty, which increased iphone sales. Every customer who upgraded his/her iphone could claim compensation. Apple's excuses won't wash: lying to users about the cause will make them liable; and the slowdown was entirely the result of avoidable design choices - choices not disclosed to users.
No fraud has been demostqrsted. Fraud requires intent, in order to prove fraud your must be able to demonstrate mens rea. I don't think you can so good luck.
The rest of your post is just garbage. You cannot demonstrate the lie that you claim exits and there is no slowdown unless the battery will cause a crash. The lowdown ends the microsecond the stress stops. The alternative would be to let the phone crash. That has dangerous implications. It was the right choice.
If any of the class actions succeed it will not be on technical issues. They put in a good fix. A lot of people who do not understand it are squawking about it (and lots of people are going "Free Money!") so Apple responded with a change and are changing (not fixing) the software so there is no cause for any complaint. Being that Apple has responded to user input in a quick and timely fashion there is not much scope for accusation of misbehaviour. Like people, corporations are not necessarily expected to be right all the time but they must be responsive when and if they are wrong. Just like you.
Lsof revision 4.89 lists on its standard output file information about files opened by processes for the following UNIX dialects:
Apple Darwin 9 and Mac OS X 10.[567]
FreeBSD 8.[234], 9.0, 10.0 and 11.0 for AMD64-based systems
Linux 2.1.72 and above for x86-based systems
Solaris 9, 10 and 11
Where the hell do you think Microsoft got the idea from? Their staff?
At which?