but the scales are already over balanced on the male side hence they are trying to bring both sides into balance. Its just the whining misogynists who don't get it.
"You don't celebrate and publicize a fact that is normal. In fact, that's treating it as special.
If you want to see fragile, go look in the mirror."
You are a classic example of why it happens
distributed power storage will be the best way. if all buildings had their own battery and they have EVs, those batteries could be accessible by the main or micro-grids in times of need. Lots of buildings will also have solar so they'll charge their own storage. Centralisation is too much of the old "put all the eggs in the one basket" idea. No real need for much centralised storage.
You'll find the detractors here do not have that capability of separating the 2 things. Virtually every negative prediction they've made about the cars and their production has failed so they try desperately try elsewhere to distract you from their failures.
In the grand scheme of things, we've only been on the planet for a short time relative to the age of the earth (unless you are young earth creationist). Just wait until it gets too hot/cold for anything to grow..
"USA doesn't matter, we don't need to do anything because it won't matter what we do" - that is the mantra of the defeatist and the "i don't care" brigade
on a person by person basis, china roasts most countries by using less. Its a bit embarrassing (or should be) when advanced nations are so profligate with resources and produces more CO2 per person than China.
Currently but the USA is the biggest per capita. China is actually investing heavily in renewables and leading in the field so their output will start to decline at some point. So you can help by not buying cheap chinese goods and not being so individually wasteful with resources and bring down the per capita usage levels.
Tesla gets mentioned because its news and refutes the crap the naysayers put out there. Once Telsa is mainstream, you'll not hear that much. Who cares about Ford, GM, BMW, Mercedes, Nissan, Volvo etc, they should be getting right as they are old tech and been around a long time, the news would be about them when they fail to get the 5 rating
problem is that when people post ignorant crap about something like tesla/systemd etc, you will get people posting to correct the ignorant crap - its just your problem that you see them all as cheerleaders - some people just like to put corrections and facts out there.
Most of those companies are in partnerships/alliances to stave off money problems by sharing platforms and include buying bankrupted manufacturers like Citroen e.g. Mazda-Ford, Nissan-Renault, Peugot-citreon-opel, Fiat-Chrysler-Maserati - it'll be hard to find a large manufacturer operating on its own these days
Your problem is that you have that stupidly unrealistic expectation that a company should be profitable overnight, that might happen for a small company but it won't for a company that needs massive investment in equipment, people and time to get running.
Tesla is doing the same thing, investing in factories and equipment to create more and faster production as its a numbers game for car manufacturers. be patient.
Auto accidents are just that ACCIDENTS - someone carrying a gun is intent on using it at some point, that is not an accident (unless they shoot their kid/partner or foot by accident which happens)
Slashdot Mirror
The Model S leads the luxury segment in sales https://cleantechnica.com/2018...
aawwww.. your misogyny betrays you
but the scales are already over balanced on the male side hence they are trying to bring both sides into balance. Its just the whining misogynists who don't get it.
"You don't celebrate and publicize a fact that is normal. In fact, that's treating it as special. If you want to see fragile, go look in the mirror." You are a classic example of why it happens
Because of the misogynists still out there even in the 21st Century, as evidenced by Trump
distributed power storage will be the best way. if all buildings had their own battery and they have EVs, those batteries could be accessible by the main or micro-grids in times of need. Lots of buildings will also have solar so they'll charge their own storage. Centralisation is too much of the old "put all the eggs in the one basket" idea. No real need for much centralised storage.
f*cking stupid analogy. comparing a new company with a new paradigm to a world wide decades old company using old tech.
oh dear... still peddling that nonsense argument. I bet they lost millions on the first few cars using that argument.
the flat earth society and other conspiracy theories are in other parts of the WWW... you seem suited to spending more time there
with your level of trolling nonsense, its not surprising you post as an AC.
You'll find the detractors here do not have that capability of separating the 2 things. Virtually every negative prediction they've made about the cars and their production has failed so they try desperately try elsewhere to distract you from their failures.
In the grand scheme of things, we've only been on the planet for a short time relative to the age of the earth (unless you are young earth creationist). Just wait until it gets too hot/cold for anything to grow..
"USA doesn't matter, we don't need to do anything because it won't matter what we do" - that is the mantra of the defeatist and the "i don't care" brigade
on a person by person basis, china roasts most countries by using less. Its a bit embarrassing (or should be) when advanced nations are so profligate with resources and produces more CO2 per person than China.
Currently but the USA is the biggest per capita. China is actually investing heavily in renewables and leading in the field so their output will start to decline at some point. So you can help by not buying cheap chinese goods and not being so individually wasteful with resources and bring down the per capita usage levels.
so a hole in the road is not a hole but a depletion of tarmac?
Tesla gets mentioned because its news and refutes the crap the naysayers put out there. Once Telsa is mainstream, you'll not hear that much. Who cares about Ford, GM, BMW, Mercedes, Nissan, Volvo etc, they should be getting right as they are old tech and been around a long time, the news would be about them when they fail to get the 5 rating
problem is that when people post ignorant crap about something like tesla/systemd etc, you will get people posting to correct the ignorant crap - its just your problem that you see them all as cheerleaders - some people just like to put corrections and facts out there.
Most of those companies are in partnerships/alliances to stave off money problems by sharing platforms and include buying bankrupted manufacturers like Citroen e.g. Mazda-Ford, Nissan-Renault, Peugot-citreon-opel, Fiat-Chrysler-Maserati - it'll be hard to find a large manufacturer operating on its own these days
Your problem is that you have that stupidly unrealistic expectation that a company should be profitable overnight, that might happen for a small company but it won't for a company that needs massive investment in equipment, people and time to get running.
Tesla is doing the same thing, investing in factories and equipment to create more and faster production as its a numbers game for car manufacturers. be patient.
Funny most other countries operate in complete gun free zones and have no regular, if any, mass shootings
so i should be free to kill anyone just because i feel like it? or do you limit killing by making it illegal and ruining your freedom?
Auto accidents are just that ACCIDENTS - someone carrying a gun is intent on using it at some point, that is not an accident (unless they shoot their kid/partner or foot by accident which happens)
so your solution would be for everyone to be armed and carrying in case a criminal has a gun? Great progress in civilising society.